Support of Beta Random Variable Times Constant and then Floored

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $Xsim Beta(alpha, beta)$ and let $ninmathbbZ^+$. Define the new random variable
$$Y=lfloor nXrfloor$$
What is the support of $Y$? Is it $0,1,...,n-1$ or is it $0,1,...,n$?
I'm sort of confused by this question, because I have seen the Beta distribution being defined in two ways; with support $(0, 1)$ as well as with support $[0,1]$. But even if its support is $[0,1]$, technically $P(X=1)=0$. So is it always true that $Y$ has support $0,1,...,n-1$?
probability probability-theory probability-distributions random-variables
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $Xsim Beta(alpha, beta)$ and let $ninmathbbZ^+$. Define the new random variable
$$Y=lfloor nXrfloor$$
What is the support of $Y$? Is it $0,1,...,n-1$ or is it $0,1,...,n$?
I'm sort of confused by this question, because I have seen the Beta distribution being defined in two ways; with support $(0, 1)$ as well as with support $[0,1]$. But even if its support is $[0,1]$, technically $P(X=1)=0$. So is it always true that $Y$ has support $0,1,...,n-1$?
probability probability-theory probability-distributions random-variables
2
"So it it always true that " - Yes.
â zhoraster
Sep 2 at 6:48
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $Xsim Beta(alpha, beta)$ and let $ninmathbbZ^+$. Define the new random variable
$$Y=lfloor nXrfloor$$
What is the support of $Y$? Is it $0,1,...,n-1$ or is it $0,1,...,n$?
I'm sort of confused by this question, because I have seen the Beta distribution being defined in two ways; with support $(0, 1)$ as well as with support $[0,1]$. But even if its support is $[0,1]$, technically $P(X=1)=0$. So is it always true that $Y$ has support $0,1,...,n-1$?
probability probability-theory probability-distributions random-variables
Let $Xsim Beta(alpha, beta)$ and let $ninmathbbZ^+$. Define the new random variable
$$Y=lfloor nXrfloor$$
What is the support of $Y$? Is it $0,1,...,n-1$ or is it $0,1,...,n$?
I'm sort of confused by this question, because I have seen the Beta distribution being defined in two ways; with support $(0, 1)$ as well as with support $[0,1]$. But even if its support is $[0,1]$, technically $P(X=1)=0$. So is it always true that $Y$ has support $0,1,...,n-1$?
probability probability-theory probability-distributions random-variables
probability probability-theory probability-distributions random-variables
edited Sep 2 at 21:20
asked Sep 2 at 6:07
jippyjoe4
4247
4247
2
"So it it always true that " - Yes.
â zhoraster
Sep 2 at 6:48
add a comment |Â
2
"So it it always true that " - Yes.
â zhoraster
Sep 2 at 6:48
2
2
"So it it always true that " - Yes.
â zhoraster
Sep 2 at 6:48
"So it it always true that " - Yes.
â zhoraster
Sep 2 at 6:48
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2902393%2fsupport-of-beta-random-variable-times-constant-and-then-floored%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
2
"So it it always true that " - Yes.
â zhoraster
Sep 2 at 6:48