basic question on definition of function

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












on wikipedia it says that a function is a relation or process that associates each x of X an element y of Y. I can understand how a function is a relation defined by some equation but can't really understand the interpretation as a process.



Is it necessary to understand this and if so could someone make this clearer for me, thanks










share|cite|improve this question





















  • In France there is two related definitions, functions and applications: your definition corresponds to application because the domain of the function is ALL the set X while, for example the real function $f(x)=dfrac 1x$ is not defined in $x=0$. In other words, many times you are concerned with an expression for which you have to define the domain of it while for your function the domain is given.
    – Piquito
    Sep 2 at 10:56















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












on wikipedia it says that a function is a relation or process that associates each x of X an element y of Y. I can understand how a function is a relation defined by some equation but can't really understand the interpretation as a process.



Is it necessary to understand this and if so could someone make this clearer for me, thanks










share|cite|improve this question





















  • In France there is two related definitions, functions and applications: your definition corresponds to application because the domain of the function is ALL the set X while, for example the real function $f(x)=dfrac 1x$ is not defined in $x=0$. In other words, many times you are concerned with an expression for which you have to define the domain of it while for your function the domain is given.
    – Piquito
    Sep 2 at 10:56













up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











on wikipedia it says that a function is a relation or process that associates each x of X an element y of Y. I can understand how a function is a relation defined by some equation but can't really understand the interpretation as a process.



Is it necessary to understand this and if so could someone make this clearer for me, thanks










share|cite|improve this question













on wikipedia it says that a function is a relation or process that associates each x of X an element y of Y. I can understand how a function is a relation defined by some equation but can't really understand the interpretation as a process.



Is it necessary to understand this and if so could someone make this clearer for me, thanks







soft-question






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Sep 2 at 10:38









James Anthony

776




776











  • In France there is two related definitions, functions and applications: your definition corresponds to application because the domain of the function is ALL the set X while, for example the real function $f(x)=dfrac 1x$ is not defined in $x=0$. In other words, many times you are concerned with an expression for which you have to define the domain of it while for your function the domain is given.
    – Piquito
    Sep 2 at 10:56

















  • In France there is two related definitions, functions and applications: your definition corresponds to application because the domain of the function is ALL the set X while, for example the real function $f(x)=dfrac 1x$ is not defined in $x=0$. In other words, many times you are concerned with an expression for which you have to define the domain of it while for your function the domain is given.
    – Piquito
    Sep 2 at 10:56
















In France there is two related definitions, functions and applications: your definition corresponds to application because the domain of the function is ALL the set X while, for example the real function $f(x)=dfrac 1x$ is not defined in $x=0$. In other words, many times you are concerned with an expression for which you have to define the domain of it while for your function the domain is given.
– Piquito
Sep 2 at 10:56





In France there is two related definitions, functions and applications: your definition corresponds to application because the domain of the function is ALL the set X while, for example the real function $f(x)=dfrac 1x$ is not defined in $x=0$. In other words, many times you are concerned with an expression for which you have to define the domain of it while for your function the domain is given.
– Piquito
Sep 2 at 10:56











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










More precisely by definition given $2$ sets $X$ and $Y$ a function $f:Xto Y$ is a "law" which associates to any value $xin X$ one and only one value $yin Y$.



Note that we don't need that $f$ is defined by an explicit formula or expression the definiton indeed works in a more general context.



For example we can consider the function $f$ which associates to any person the mother.



Or in a more mathematical context, we can consider the function $f:mathbbNtomathbbN$ which associates to any natural number $n$ the corresponding $n^th$ prime number.



Refer also to the related



  • What exactly is a function?


  • Why is $sin : mathbbR to [-5,5] $ different from $sin : mathbbR to mathbbR$?






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • thanks, if a function is a law then would that not imply that say f(x)=x+1 is the function?
    – James Anthony
    Sep 2 at 10:50










  • @JamesAnthony We always need to specify the in which sets we are considering the law, so $f:mathbbRto mathbbR$ such that $f(x)=x+1$ is a function.
    – gimusi
    Sep 2 at 10:52










  • So is function not a product of the law
    – James Anthony
    Sep 2 at 10:53






  • 1




    @JamesAnthony I've added some link where the topic is discussed in great detail.
    – gimusi
    Sep 2 at 10:54










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2902581%2fbasic-question-on-definition-of-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










More precisely by definition given $2$ sets $X$ and $Y$ a function $f:Xto Y$ is a "law" which associates to any value $xin X$ one and only one value $yin Y$.



Note that we don't need that $f$ is defined by an explicit formula or expression the definiton indeed works in a more general context.



For example we can consider the function $f$ which associates to any person the mother.



Or in a more mathematical context, we can consider the function $f:mathbbNtomathbbN$ which associates to any natural number $n$ the corresponding $n^th$ prime number.



Refer also to the related



  • What exactly is a function?


  • Why is $sin : mathbbR to [-5,5] $ different from $sin : mathbbR to mathbbR$?






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • thanks, if a function is a law then would that not imply that say f(x)=x+1 is the function?
    – James Anthony
    Sep 2 at 10:50










  • @JamesAnthony We always need to specify the in which sets we are considering the law, so $f:mathbbRto mathbbR$ such that $f(x)=x+1$ is a function.
    – gimusi
    Sep 2 at 10:52










  • So is function not a product of the law
    – James Anthony
    Sep 2 at 10:53






  • 1




    @JamesAnthony I've added some link where the topic is discussed in great detail.
    – gimusi
    Sep 2 at 10:54














up vote
2
down vote



accepted










More precisely by definition given $2$ sets $X$ and $Y$ a function $f:Xto Y$ is a "law" which associates to any value $xin X$ one and only one value $yin Y$.



Note that we don't need that $f$ is defined by an explicit formula or expression the definiton indeed works in a more general context.



For example we can consider the function $f$ which associates to any person the mother.



Or in a more mathematical context, we can consider the function $f:mathbbNtomathbbN$ which associates to any natural number $n$ the corresponding $n^th$ prime number.



Refer also to the related



  • What exactly is a function?


  • Why is $sin : mathbbR to [-5,5] $ different from $sin : mathbbR to mathbbR$?






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • thanks, if a function is a law then would that not imply that say f(x)=x+1 is the function?
    – James Anthony
    Sep 2 at 10:50










  • @JamesAnthony We always need to specify the in which sets we are considering the law, so $f:mathbbRto mathbbR$ such that $f(x)=x+1$ is a function.
    – gimusi
    Sep 2 at 10:52










  • So is function not a product of the law
    – James Anthony
    Sep 2 at 10:53






  • 1




    @JamesAnthony I've added some link where the topic is discussed in great detail.
    – gimusi
    Sep 2 at 10:54












up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






More precisely by definition given $2$ sets $X$ and $Y$ a function $f:Xto Y$ is a "law" which associates to any value $xin X$ one and only one value $yin Y$.



Note that we don't need that $f$ is defined by an explicit formula or expression the definiton indeed works in a more general context.



For example we can consider the function $f$ which associates to any person the mother.



Or in a more mathematical context, we can consider the function $f:mathbbNtomathbbN$ which associates to any natural number $n$ the corresponding $n^th$ prime number.



Refer also to the related



  • What exactly is a function?


  • Why is $sin : mathbbR to [-5,5] $ different from $sin : mathbbR to mathbbR$?






share|cite|improve this answer














More precisely by definition given $2$ sets $X$ and $Y$ a function $f:Xto Y$ is a "law" which associates to any value $xin X$ one and only one value $yin Y$.



Note that we don't need that $f$ is defined by an explicit formula or expression the definiton indeed works in a more general context.



For example we can consider the function $f$ which associates to any person the mother.



Or in a more mathematical context, we can consider the function $f:mathbbNtomathbbN$ which associates to any natural number $n$ the corresponding $n^th$ prime number.



Refer also to the related



  • What exactly is a function?


  • Why is $sin : mathbbR to [-5,5] $ different from $sin : mathbbR to mathbbR$?







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Sep 2 at 10:53

























answered Sep 2 at 10:42









gimusi

72.2k73888




72.2k73888











  • thanks, if a function is a law then would that not imply that say f(x)=x+1 is the function?
    – James Anthony
    Sep 2 at 10:50










  • @JamesAnthony We always need to specify the in which sets we are considering the law, so $f:mathbbRto mathbbR$ such that $f(x)=x+1$ is a function.
    – gimusi
    Sep 2 at 10:52










  • So is function not a product of the law
    – James Anthony
    Sep 2 at 10:53






  • 1




    @JamesAnthony I've added some link where the topic is discussed in great detail.
    – gimusi
    Sep 2 at 10:54
















  • thanks, if a function is a law then would that not imply that say f(x)=x+1 is the function?
    – James Anthony
    Sep 2 at 10:50










  • @JamesAnthony We always need to specify the in which sets we are considering the law, so $f:mathbbRto mathbbR$ such that $f(x)=x+1$ is a function.
    – gimusi
    Sep 2 at 10:52










  • So is function not a product of the law
    – James Anthony
    Sep 2 at 10:53






  • 1




    @JamesAnthony I've added some link where the topic is discussed in great detail.
    – gimusi
    Sep 2 at 10:54















thanks, if a function is a law then would that not imply that say f(x)=x+1 is the function?
– James Anthony
Sep 2 at 10:50




thanks, if a function is a law then would that not imply that say f(x)=x+1 is the function?
– James Anthony
Sep 2 at 10:50












@JamesAnthony We always need to specify the in which sets we are considering the law, so $f:mathbbRto mathbbR$ such that $f(x)=x+1$ is a function.
– gimusi
Sep 2 at 10:52




@JamesAnthony We always need to specify the in which sets we are considering the law, so $f:mathbbRto mathbbR$ such that $f(x)=x+1$ is a function.
– gimusi
Sep 2 at 10:52












So is function not a product of the law
– James Anthony
Sep 2 at 10:53




So is function not a product of the law
– James Anthony
Sep 2 at 10:53




1




1




@JamesAnthony I've added some link where the topic is discussed in great detail.
– gimusi
Sep 2 at 10:54




@JamesAnthony I've added some link where the topic is discussed in great detail.
– gimusi
Sep 2 at 10:54

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2902581%2fbasic-question-on-definition-of-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

Solve: $(3xy-2ay^2)dx+(x^2-2axy)dy=0$