Exponential Growth Problem. Is this solution correct?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I would just like to confirm that I'm doing this correctly. If not, any help would be appreciated. Thanks!



The problem:



A painting sold for $$274$ in $1977$ and was sold again in $1987$ for $$470$. Assume that the growth in the value $V$ of the collector’s item was exponential.



Find the value $k$ of the exponential growth rate. Assume $V_0 = 274$.



My attempt at solving it:



$470=274e^10k$



$k = 0.054$ (rounded to the nearest thousandth)










share|cite|improve this question























  • The answer is correct.
    – André Nicolas
    Mar 7 '14 at 21:56










  • Correct, but you might want to write the exponent as $10k$.
    – marty cohen
    Jul 24 '17 at 22:07














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I would just like to confirm that I'm doing this correctly. If not, any help would be appreciated. Thanks!



The problem:



A painting sold for $$274$ in $1977$ and was sold again in $1987$ for $$470$. Assume that the growth in the value $V$ of the collector’s item was exponential.



Find the value $k$ of the exponential growth rate. Assume $V_0 = 274$.



My attempt at solving it:



$470=274e^10k$



$k = 0.054$ (rounded to the nearest thousandth)










share|cite|improve this question























  • The answer is correct.
    – André Nicolas
    Mar 7 '14 at 21:56










  • Correct, but you might want to write the exponent as $10k$.
    – marty cohen
    Jul 24 '17 at 22:07












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I would just like to confirm that I'm doing this correctly. If not, any help would be appreciated. Thanks!



The problem:



A painting sold for $$274$ in $1977$ and was sold again in $1987$ for $$470$. Assume that the growth in the value $V$ of the collector’s item was exponential.



Find the value $k$ of the exponential growth rate. Assume $V_0 = 274$.



My attempt at solving it:



$470=274e^10k$



$k = 0.054$ (rounded to the nearest thousandth)










share|cite|improve this question















I would just like to confirm that I'm doing this correctly. If not, any help would be appreciated. Thanks!



The problem:



A painting sold for $$274$ in $1977$ and was sold again in $1987$ for $$470$. Assume that the growth in the value $V$ of the collector’s item was exponential.



Find the value $k$ of the exponential growth rate. Assume $V_0 = 274$.



My attempt at solving it:



$470=274e^10k$



$k = 0.054$ (rounded to the nearest thousandth)







algebra-precalculus proof-verification exponential-function






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 4 at 10:43









TheSimpliFire

10.8k62054




10.8k62054










asked Mar 7 '14 at 21:53









Learner

3494921




3494921











  • The answer is correct.
    – André Nicolas
    Mar 7 '14 at 21:56










  • Correct, but you might want to write the exponent as $10k$.
    – marty cohen
    Jul 24 '17 at 22:07
















  • The answer is correct.
    – André Nicolas
    Mar 7 '14 at 21:56










  • Correct, but you might want to write the exponent as $10k$.
    – marty cohen
    Jul 24 '17 at 22:07















The answer is correct.
– André Nicolas
Mar 7 '14 at 21:56




The answer is correct.
– André Nicolas
Mar 7 '14 at 21:56












Correct, but you might want to write the exponent as $10k$.
– marty cohen
Jul 24 '17 at 22:07




Correct, but you might want to write the exponent as $10k$.
– marty cohen
Jul 24 '17 at 22:07










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













Your answer is correct. The exact value would be



$$k = frac110lnleft(frac470274right)$$



which approximates to: $k approx 0.054$ as you said. Well done.






share|cite|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f703541%2fexponential-growth-problem-is-this-solution-correct%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Your answer is correct. The exact value would be



    $$k = frac110lnleft(frac470274right)$$



    which approximates to: $k approx 0.054$ as you said. Well done.






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Your answer is correct. The exact value would be



      $$k = frac110lnleft(frac470274right)$$



      which approximates to: $k approx 0.054$ as you said. Well done.






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        Your answer is correct. The exact value would be



        $$k = frac110lnleft(frac470274right)$$



        which approximates to: $k approx 0.054$ as you said. Well done.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Your answer is correct. The exact value would be



        $$k = frac110lnleft(frac470274right)$$



        which approximates to: $k approx 0.054$ as you said. Well done.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 14 '14 at 9:42









        naslundx

        7,86052739




        7,86052739



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f703541%2fexponential-growth-problem-is-this-solution-correct%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            Carbon dioxide

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?