Fundamental group of a quotient of a cylinder

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Let $X$ be a connected topological space which admits a universal covering. Let $Y$ be the topological space obtained as following:we have an homeomorphism $f : X to X$ , we take $X times left[0,1right]$ and we identify $(x,0)$ with $(f(x),1)$.



I should prove that $pi_1(Y)$ is a semidirect product of $pi_1(X)$ and $mathbbZ$.



I think I found a solution but the fact that does not convince me is that I did not use the universal covering hypothesis.



Let $$pi: X times mathbbR to Y$$ $$(x,t) to (f^-left lfloortright rfloor(x),t ) .$$ This map is a covering map.



One can check that the automorphism group is $mathbbZ$ and acts transitively on the fiber of this covering; actually, one can explicitly describe this group as the maps $$alpha_n(x,t)=(f^n(x),t+n)$$ with $n$ an integer.



So, because of standard theory facts about normal covering one has $$fracpi_1(Y)pi_1(X) cong mathbbZ .$$



Now, a reasoning of group theory should end the demonstration.



Where is the mistake and where should I have used that hypothesis?










share|cite|improve this question





















  • Please provide a proof that the map you wrote is a covering map.
    – Steve D
    Sep 2 at 13:11










  • It is not clear to me even why $pi$ is continuous.
    – Pedro Tamaroff♦
    Sep 2 at 14:59














up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Let $X$ be a connected topological space which admits a universal covering. Let $Y$ be the topological space obtained as following:we have an homeomorphism $f : X to X$ , we take $X times left[0,1right]$ and we identify $(x,0)$ with $(f(x),1)$.



I should prove that $pi_1(Y)$ is a semidirect product of $pi_1(X)$ and $mathbbZ$.



I think I found a solution but the fact that does not convince me is that I did not use the universal covering hypothesis.



Let $$pi: X times mathbbR to Y$$ $$(x,t) to (f^-left lfloortright rfloor(x),t ) .$$ This map is a covering map.



One can check that the automorphism group is $mathbbZ$ and acts transitively on the fiber of this covering; actually, one can explicitly describe this group as the maps $$alpha_n(x,t)=(f^n(x),t+n)$$ with $n$ an integer.



So, because of standard theory facts about normal covering one has $$fracpi_1(Y)pi_1(X) cong mathbbZ .$$



Now, a reasoning of group theory should end the demonstration.



Where is the mistake and where should I have used that hypothesis?










share|cite|improve this question





















  • Please provide a proof that the map you wrote is a covering map.
    – Steve D
    Sep 2 at 13:11










  • It is not clear to me even why $pi$ is continuous.
    – Pedro Tamaroff♦
    Sep 2 at 14:59












up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





Let $X$ be a connected topological space which admits a universal covering. Let $Y$ be the topological space obtained as following:we have an homeomorphism $f : X to X$ , we take $X times left[0,1right]$ and we identify $(x,0)$ with $(f(x),1)$.



I should prove that $pi_1(Y)$ is a semidirect product of $pi_1(X)$ and $mathbbZ$.



I think I found a solution but the fact that does not convince me is that I did not use the universal covering hypothesis.



Let $$pi: X times mathbbR to Y$$ $$(x,t) to (f^-left lfloortright rfloor(x),t ) .$$ This map is a covering map.



One can check that the automorphism group is $mathbbZ$ and acts transitively on the fiber of this covering; actually, one can explicitly describe this group as the maps $$alpha_n(x,t)=(f^n(x),t+n)$$ with $n$ an integer.



So, because of standard theory facts about normal covering one has $$fracpi_1(Y)pi_1(X) cong mathbbZ .$$



Now, a reasoning of group theory should end the demonstration.



Where is the mistake and where should I have used that hypothesis?










share|cite|improve this question













Let $X$ be a connected topological space which admits a universal covering. Let $Y$ be the topological space obtained as following:we have an homeomorphism $f : X to X$ , we take $X times left[0,1right]$ and we identify $(x,0)$ with $(f(x),1)$.



I should prove that $pi_1(Y)$ is a semidirect product of $pi_1(X)$ and $mathbbZ$.



I think I found a solution but the fact that does not convince me is that I did not use the universal covering hypothesis.



Let $$pi: X times mathbbR to Y$$ $$(x,t) to (f^-left lfloortright rfloor(x),t ) .$$ This map is a covering map.



One can check that the automorphism group is $mathbbZ$ and acts transitively on the fiber of this covering; actually, one can explicitly describe this group as the maps $$alpha_n(x,t)=(f^n(x),t+n)$$ with $n$ an integer.



So, because of standard theory facts about normal covering one has $$fracpi_1(Y)pi_1(X) cong mathbbZ .$$



Now, a reasoning of group theory should end the demonstration.



Where is the mistake and where should I have used that hypothesis?







general-topology algebraic-topology fundamental-groups semidirect-product






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Sep 2 at 11:24









Tommaso Scognamiglio

358211




358211











  • Please provide a proof that the map you wrote is a covering map.
    – Steve D
    Sep 2 at 13:11










  • It is not clear to me even why $pi$ is continuous.
    – Pedro Tamaroff♦
    Sep 2 at 14:59
















  • Please provide a proof that the map you wrote is a covering map.
    – Steve D
    Sep 2 at 13:11










  • It is not clear to me even why $pi$ is continuous.
    – Pedro Tamaroff♦
    Sep 2 at 14:59















Please provide a proof that the map you wrote is a covering map.
– Steve D
Sep 2 at 13:11




Please provide a proof that the map you wrote is a covering map.
– Steve D
Sep 2 at 13:11












It is not clear to me even why $pi$ is continuous.
– Pedro Tamaroff♦
Sep 2 at 14:59




It is not clear to me even why $pi$ is continuous.
– Pedro Tamaroff♦
Sep 2 at 14:59










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













Note that the homeomorphism $f$ gives an isomorphism $f_*=pi_1(f) : pi_1(X) longrightarrow pi_1(X)$, so that $mathbb Z$ acts on $pi_1(X)$ via $nmapsto f_*^n$. In this way you obtain a group $G = pi_1(X) rtimes mathbb Z$. Now recall that if $pi : tildeXto X$ is the universal cover of $X$, there is an isomorphism between the group of deck transformations of $pi$ and $pi_1(X)$. I will produce from this universal cover of $X$ a cover of $Y = IX/((x,0) = (f(x),1))$.



Since $f$ is a homeomorphism, it lifts to a homeomorphism $tilde f$ of $tildeX$ such that $pi f =tildef pi$. You can now consider the disjoint union $tilde Y$ of the spaces $tilde X[i] times [0,1]$ with $iinmathbb Z$ where $(tilde x_i,0)$ identifies with $(tilde f(tilde x_i+1),1)$. There is a (well defined) map $rho : tilde Yto Y$ that sends $[tilde x_i,t]$ to $[pitilde x_i,t]$ and this is the universal cover of $Y$.



It suffices then to show that the group $D(rho)$ of deck transformations of $rho$ is a semidirect product of $D(pi)$ and $mathbb Z$. The definition of $rho$ shows that at least the group $D(rho)$ contains a copy of $D(pi)$, where you can make any deck transformation of $pi$ act on the first coordinate; you also have a copy of $mathbb Z$ acting by shifting through $tilde f$. Perhaps you can take it from here and conclude.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • There are some details missing, notably showing your universal cover is simply connected. A possibly easier approach is to build your covering space out of $X$ instead; this space is homotopy equivalent to $X$, and then getting the fundamental group structure (and even the semidirect action) is easier.
    – Steve D
    Sep 2 at 16:07










  • @SteveD I would be glad to have this answer improved or have a better answer posted. I am no serious algebraic topologist, so this is the best I could come up with. :)
    – Pedro Tamaroff♦
    Sep 2 at 16:09










  • No your approach is perfect! I was simply mentioning that the group structure falls out a bit better if you don't pass to the universal cover first. Showing the space is simply connected is not completely trivial, but I think that's fine to leave to the reader :). If I have time later, I'll post an answer as well.
    – Steve D
    Sep 2 at 16:12

















up vote
1
down vote













Your idea is sound, but the map you wrote down is not a covering map (at least it's not obviously one to me).



The space you're talking about is the mapping torus, and we can cover it with something called the mapping telescope.



Let $Y_mathbbZ=sqcup (Xtimes[n,n+1])$, and let $widehatY$ be the quotient space of $Y_mathbbZ$ identifying $(x,n+1)$ and $(f(x),n+1)$, where the former is a right endpoint, and the latter a left endpoint. We can further write $widehatY_m$ as the image of $le m$ in $widehatY$.



Now $widehatY$ is a covering space of your $Y$, with covering map $rho([x,n])=[x,npmod1]$. The sheets of this covering look like
$$ rho^-1([x,t])=[f^m(x),t+m]mid minmathbbZ$$



Now the deck transformations act on $widehatY$ via $p_m([x,n])=[f^m(x),n+m]$. Since this action is transitive on fibers, $rho_*pi_1(widehatY)$ is a normal subgroup of $pi_1(Y)$, and we also have $pi_1(Y)/rho_*pi_1(widehatY)congmathbbZ$, with $mathbbZ$ corresponding to those deck transformations. Since $mathbbZ$ is a free group, we actually have a split extension
$$ pi_1(Y)congpi_1(widehatY)rtimesmathbbZ$$



Finally, we have $pi_1(widehatY)congpi_1(X)$. That follows by describing an explicit homotopy equivalence between $X$ and $widehatY_m$ [for any $m$], and then reasoning via compactness that any map $alpha:S^1rightarrowwidehatY$ ends up in some $widehatY_m$. Note that we can actually describe the semidirect action as well, since we have the deck transformations above that generate the $mathbbZ$ factor. Namely, for $[alpha]inpi_1(X)$ and $minmathbbZ$, the action is given by
$$ [alpha]^(m)=[f^m(alpha)]$$






share|cite|improve this answer



























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Someone suggested to me the following alternative approach. Pick a basepoint $astin X$ and consider the covering map $g : Yto S^1$ that sends $[x,t]$ to $exp(2 pi i t)$. This induces a map $g_*:pi_1(Y) to pi_1(S^1) = mathbb Z$. By picking a loop from the $ast$ to $f(ast)$, you can construct a splitting for $g_*$. This means that $pi_1(Y)$ is the semidirect product of $mathbb Z$ with the kernel of $g_*$, so it suffices to show that $ker g_*$ is $pi_1(X)$. The fibre of $g$ at the basepoint of $S^1$ is equal to the space obtained by glueing $X$ to $X$ along $f$, and since $f$ is an homeomorphism, this is just $X$. Since $pi_2(S^1)=0$, you obtain from the LES of a fibration what you wanted, a (split) exact sequence



    $$0to pi_1(X) to pi_1(Y)to mathbb Zto 0.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer




















      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2902621%2ffundamental-group-of-a-quotient-of-a-cylinder%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Note that the homeomorphism $f$ gives an isomorphism $f_*=pi_1(f) : pi_1(X) longrightarrow pi_1(X)$, so that $mathbb Z$ acts on $pi_1(X)$ via $nmapsto f_*^n$. In this way you obtain a group $G = pi_1(X) rtimes mathbb Z$. Now recall that if $pi : tildeXto X$ is the universal cover of $X$, there is an isomorphism between the group of deck transformations of $pi$ and $pi_1(X)$. I will produce from this universal cover of $X$ a cover of $Y = IX/((x,0) = (f(x),1))$.



      Since $f$ is a homeomorphism, it lifts to a homeomorphism $tilde f$ of $tildeX$ such that $pi f =tildef pi$. You can now consider the disjoint union $tilde Y$ of the spaces $tilde X[i] times [0,1]$ with $iinmathbb Z$ where $(tilde x_i,0)$ identifies with $(tilde f(tilde x_i+1),1)$. There is a (well defined) map $rho : tilde Yto Y$ that sends $[tilde x_i,t]$ to $[pitilde x_i,t]$ and this is the universal cover of $Y$.



      It suffices then to show that the group $D(rho)$ of deck transformations of $rho$ is a semidirect product of $D(pi)$ and $mathbb Z$. The definition of $rho$ shows that at least the group $D(rho)$ contains a copy of $D(pi)$, where you can make any deck transformation of $pi$ act on the first coordinate; you also have a copy of $mathbb Z$ acting by shifting through $tilde f$. Perhaps you can take it from here and conclude.






      share|cite|improve this answer




















      • There are some details missing, notably showing your universal cover is simply connected. A possibly easier approach is to build your covering space out of $X$ instead; this space is homotopy equivalent to $X$, and then getting the fundamental group structure (and even the semidirect action) is easier.
        – Steve D
        Sep 2 at 16:07










      • @SteveD I would be glad to have this answer improved or have a better answer posted. I am no serious algebraic topologist, so this is the best I could come up with. :)
        – Pedro Tamaroff♦
        Sep 2 at 16:09










      • No your approach is perfect! I was simply mentioning that the group structure falls out a bit better if you don't pass to the universal cover first. Showing the space is simply connected is not completely trivial, but I think that's fine to leave to the reader :). If I have time later, I'll post an answer as well.
        – Steve D
        Sep 2 at 16:12














      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Note that the homeomorphism $f$ gives an isomorphism $f_*=pi_1(f) : pi_1(X) longrightarrow pi_1(X)$, so that $mathbb Z$ acts on $pi_1(X)$ via $nmapsto f_*^n$. In this way you obtain a group $G = pi_1(X) rtimes mathbb Z$. Now recall that if $pi : tildeXto X$ is the universal cover of $X$, there is an isomorphism between the group of deck transformations of $pi$ and $pi_1(X)$. I will produce from this universal cover of $X$ a cover of $Y = IX/((x,0) = (f(x),1))$.



      Since $f$ is a homeomorphism, it lifts to a homeomorphism $tilde f$ of $tildeX$ such that $pi f =tildef pi$. You can now consider the disjoint union $tilde Y$ of the spaces $tilde X[i] times [0,1]$ with $iinmathbb Z$ where $(tilde x_i,0)$ identifies with $(tilde f(tilde x_i+1),1)$. There is a (well defined) map $rho : tilde Yto Y$ that sends $[tilde x_i,t]$ to $[pitilde x_i,t]$ and this is the universal cover of $Y$.



      It suffices then to show that the group $D(rho)$ of deck transformations of $rho$ is a semidirect product of $D(pi)$ and $mathbb Z$. The definition of $rho$ shows that at least the group $D(rho)$ contains a copy of $D(pi)$, where you can make any deck transformation of $pi$ act on the first coordinate; you also have a copy of $mathbb Z$ acting by shifting through $tilde f$. Perhaps you can take it from here and conclude.






      share|cite|improve this answer




















      • There are some details missing, notably showing your universal cover is simply connected. A possibly easier approach is to build your covering space out of $X$ instead; this space is homotopy equivalent to $X$, and then getting the fundamental group structure (and even the semidirect action) is easier.
        – Steve D
        Sep 2 at 16:07










      • @SteveD I would be glad to have this answer improved or have a better answer posted. I am no serious algebraic topologist, so this is the best I could come up with. :)
        – Pedro Tamaroff♦
        Sep 2 at 16:09










      • No your approach is perfect! I was simply mentioning that the group structure falls out a bit better if you don't pass to the universal cover first. Showing the space is simply connected is not completely trivial, but I think that's fine to leave to the reader :). If I have time later, I'll post an answer as well.
        – Steve D
        Sep 2 at 16:12












      up vote
      1
      down vote










      up vote
      1
      down vote









      Note that the homeomorphism $f$ gives an isomorphism $f_*=pi_1(f) : pi_1(X) longrightarrow pi_1(X)$, so that $mathbb Z$ acts on $pi_1(X)$ via $nmapsto f_*^n$. In this way you obtain a group $G = pi_1(X) rtimes mathbb Z$. Now recall that if $pi : tildeXto X$ is the universal cover of $X$, there is an isomorphism between the group of deck transformations of $pi$ and $pi_1(X)$. I will produce from this universal cover of $X$ a cover of $Y = IX/((x,0) = (f(x),1))$.



      Since $f$ is a homeomorphism, it lifts to a homeomorphism $tilde f$ of $tildeX$ such that $pi f =tildef pi$. You can now consider the disjoint union $tilde Y$ of the spaces $tilde X[i] times [0,1]$ with $iinmathbb Z$ where $(tilde x_i,0)$ identifies with $(tilde f(tilde x_i+1),1)$. There is a (well defined) map $rho : tilde Yto Y$ that sends $[tilde x_i,t]$ to $[pitilde x_i,t]$ and this is the universal cover of $Y$.



      It suffices then to show that the group $D(rho)$ of deck transformations of $rho$ is a semidirect product of $D(pi)$ and $mathbb Z$. The definition of $rho$ shows that at least the group $D(rho)$ contains a copy of $D(pi)$, where you can make any deck transformation of $pi$ act on the first coordinate; you also have a copy of $mathbb Z$ acting by shifting through $tilde f$. Perhaps you can take it from here and conclude.






      share|cite|improve this answer












      Note that the homeomorphism $f$ gives an isomorphism $f_*=pi_1(f) : pi_1(X) longrightarrow pi_1(X)$, so that $mathbb Z$ acts on $pi_1(X)$ via $nmapsto f_*^n$. In this way you obtain a group $G = pi_1(X) rtimes mathbb Z$. Now recall that if $pi : tildeXto X$ is the universal cover of $X$, there is an isomorphism between the group of deck transformations of $pi$ and $pi_1(X)$. I will produce from this universal cover of $X$ a cover of $Y = IX/((x,0) = (f(x),1))$.



      Since $f$ is a homeomorphism, it lifts to a homeomorphism $tilde f$ of $tildeX$ such that $pi f =tildef pi$. You can now consider the disjoint union $tilde Y$ of the spaces $tilde X[i] times [0,1]$ with $iinmathbb Z$ where $(tilde x_i,0)$ identifies with $(tilde f(tilde x_i+1),1)$. There is a (well defined) map $rho : tilde Yto Y$ that sends $[tilde x_i,t]$ to $[pitilde x_i,t]$ and this is the universal cover of $Y$.



      It suffices then to show that the group $D(rho)$ of deck transformations of $rho$ is a semidirect product of $D(pi)$ and $mathbb Z$. The definition of $rho$ shows that at least the group $D(rho)$ contains a copy of $D(pi)$, where you can make any deck transformation of $pi$ act on the first coordinate; you also have a copy of $mathbb Z$ acting by shifting through $tilde f$. Perhaps you can take it from here and conclude.







      share|cite|improve this answer












      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer










      answered Sep 2 at 15:30









      Pedro Tamaroff♦

      94.4k10144293




      94.4k10144293











      • There are some details missing, notably showing your universal cover is simply connected. A possibly easier approach is to build your covering space out of $X$ instead; this space is homotopy equivalent to $X$, and then getting the fundamental group structure (and even the semidirect action) is easier.
        – Steve D
        Sep 2 at 16:07










      • @SteveD I would be glad to have this answer improved or have a better answer posted. I am no serious algebraic topologist, so this is the best I could come up with. :)
        – Pedro Tamaroff♦
        Sep 2 at 16:09










      • No your approach is perfect! I was simply mentioning that the group structure falls out a bit better if you don't pass to the universal cover first. Showing the space is simply connected is not completely trivial, but I think that's fine to leave to the reader :). If I have time later, I'll post an answer as well.
        – Steve D
        Sep 2 at 16:12
















      • There are some details missing, notably showing your universal cover is simply connected. A possibly easier approach is to build your covering space out of $X$ instead; this space is homotopy equivalent to $X$, and then getting the fundamental group structure (and even the semidirect action) is easier.
        – Steve D
        Sep 2 at 16:07










      • @SteveD I would be glad to have this answer improved or have a better answer posted. I am no serious algebraic topologist, so this is the best I could come up with. :)
        – Pedro Tamaroff♦
        Sep 2 at 16:09










      • No your approach is perfect! I was simply mentioning that the group structure falls out a bit better if you don't pass to the universal cover first. Showing the space is simply connected is not completely trivial, but I think that's fine to leave to the reader :). If I have time later, I'll post an answer as well.
        – Steve D
        Sep 2 at 16:12















      There are some details missing, notably showing your universal cover is simply connected. A possibly easier approach is to build your covering space out of $X$ instead; this space is homotopy equivalent to $X$, and then getting the fundamental group structure (and even the semidirect action) is easier.
      – Steve D
      Sep 2 at 16:07




      There are some details missing, notably showing your universal cover is simply connected. A possibly easier approach is to build your covering space out of $X$ instead; this space is homotopy equivalent to $X$, and then getting the fundamental group structure (and even the semidirect action) is easier.
      – Steve D
      Sep 2 at 16:07












      @SteveD I would be glad to have this answer improved or have a better answer posted. I am no serious algebraic topologist, so this is the best I could come up with. :)
      – Pedro Tamaroff♦
      Sep 2 at 16:09




      @SteveD I would be glad to have this answer improved or have a better answer posted. I am no serious algebraic topologist, so this is the best I could come up with. :)
      – Pedro Tamaroff♦
      Sep 2 at 16:09












      No your approach is perfect! I was simply mentioning that the group structure falls out a bit better if you don't pass to the universal cover first. Showing the space is simply connected is not completely trivial, but I think that's fine to leave to the reader :). If I have time later, I'll post an answer as well.
      – Steve D
      Sep 2 at 16:12




      No your approach is perfect! I was simply mentioning that the group structure falls out a bit better if you don't pass to the universal cover first. Showing the space is simply connected is not completely trivial, but I think that's fine to leave to the reader :). If I have time later, I'll post an answer as well.
      – Steve D
      Sep 2 at 16:12










      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Your idea is sound, but the map you wrote down is not a covering map (at least it's not obviously one to me).



      The space you're talking about is the mapping torus, and we can cover it with something called the mapping telescope.



      Let $Y_mathbbZ=sqcup (Xtimes[n,n+1])$, and let $widehatY$ be the quotient space of $Y_mathbbZ$ identifying $(x,n+1)$ and $(f(x),n+1)$, where the former is a right endpoint, and the latter a left endpoint. We can further write $widehatY_m$ as the image of $le m$ in $widehatY$.



      Now $widehatY$ is a covering space of your $Y$, with covering map $rho([x,n])=[x,npmod1]$. The sheets of this covering look like
      $$ rho^-1([x,t])=[f^m(x),t+m]mid minmathbbZ$$



      Now the deck transformations act on $widehatY$ via $p_m([x,n])=[f^m(x),n+m]$. Since this action is transitive on fibers, $rho_*pi_1(widehatY)$ is a normal subgroup of $pi_1(Y)$, and we also have $pi_1(Y)/rho_*pi_1(widehatY)congmathbbZ$, with $mathbbZ$ corresponding to those deck transformations. Since $mathbbZ$ is a free group, we actually have a split extension
      $$ pi_1(Y)congpi_1(widehatY)rtimesmathbbZ$$



      Finally, we have $pi_1(widehatY)congpi_1(X)$. That follows by describing an explicit homotopy equivalence between $X$ and $widehatY_m$ [for any $m$], and then reasoning via compactness that any map $alpha:S^1rightarrowwidehatY$ ends up in some $widehatY_m$. Note that we can actually describe the semidirect action as well, since we have the deck transformations above that generate the $mathbbZ$ factor. Namely, for $[alpha]inpi_1(X)$ and $minmathbbZ$, the action is given by
      $$ [alpha]^(m)=[f^m(alpha)]$$






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        up vote
        1
        down vote













        Your idea is sound, but the map you wrote down is not a covering map (at least it's not obviously one to me).



        The space you're talking about is the mapping torus, and we can cover it with something called the mapping telescope.



        Let $Y_mathbbZ=sqcup (Xtimes[n,n+1])$, and let $widehatY$ be the quotient space of $Y_mathbbZ$ identifying $(x,n+1)$ and $(f(x),n+1)$, where the former is a right endpoint, and the latter a left endpoint. We can further write $widehatY_m$ as the image of $le m$ in $widehatY$.



        Now $widehatY$ is a covering space of your $Y$, with covering map $rho([x,n])=[x,npmod1]$. The sheets of this covering look like
        $$ rho^-1([x,t])=[f^m(x),t+m]mid minmathbbZ$$



        Now the deck transformations act on $widehatY$ via $p_m([x,n])=[f^m(x),n+m]$. Since this action is transitive on fibers, $rho_*pi_1(widehatY)$ is a normal subgroup of $pi_1(Y)$, and we also have $pi_1(Y)/rho_*pi_1(widehatY)congmathbbZ$, with $mathbbZ$ corresponding to those deck transformations. Since $mathbbZ$ is a free group, we actually have a split extension
        $$ pi_1(Y)congpi_1(widehatY)rtimesmathbbZ$$



        Finally, we have $pi_1(widehatY)congpi_1(X)$. That follows by describing an explicit homotopy equivalence between $X$ and $widehatY_m$ [for any $m$], and then reasoning via compactness that any map $alpha:S^1rightarrowwidehatY$ ends up in some $widehatY_m$. Note that we can actually describe the semidirect action as well, since we have the deck transformations above that generate the $mathbbZ$ factor. Namely, for $[alpha]inpi_1(X)$ and $minmathbbZ$, the action is given by
        $$ [alpha]^(m)=[f^m(alpha)]$$






        share|cite|improve this answer






















          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          Your idea is sound, but the map you wrote down is not a covering map (at least it's not obviously one to me).



          The space you're talking about is the mapping torus, and we can cover it with something called the mapping telescope.



          Let $Y_mathbbZ=sqcup (Xtimes[n,n+1])$, and let $widehatY$ be the quotient space of $Y_mathbbZ$ identifying $(x,n+1)$ and $(f(x),n+1)$, where the former is a right endpoint, and the latter a left endpoint. We can further write $widehatY_m$ as the image of $le m$ in $widehatY$.



          Now $widehatY$ is a covering space of your $Y$, with covering map $rho([x,n])=[x,npmod1]$. The sheets of this covering look like
          $$ rho^-1([x,t])=[f^m(x),t+m]mid minmathbbZ$$



          Now the deck transformations act on $widehatY$ via $p_m([x,n])=[f^m(x),n+m]$. Since this action is transitive on fibers, $rho_*pi_1(widehatY)$ is a normal subgroup of $pi_1(Y)$, and we also have $pi_1(Y)/rho_*pi_1(widehatY)congmathbbZ$, with $mathbbZ$ corresponding to those deck transformations. Since $mathbbZ$ is a free group, we actually have a split extension
          $$ pi_1(Y)congpi_1(widehatY)rtimesmathbbZ$$



          Finally, we have $pi_1(widehatY)congpi_1(X)$. That follows by describing an explicit homotopy equivalence between $X$ and $widehatY_m$ [for any $m$], and then reasoning via compactness that any map $alpha:S^1rightarrowwidehatY$ ends up in some $widehatY_m$. Note that we can actually describe the semidirect action as well, since we have the deck transformations above that generate the $mathbbZ$ factor. Namely, for $[alpha]inpi_1(X)$ and $minmathbbZ$, the action is given by
          $$ [alpha]^(m)=[f^m(alpha)]$$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Your idea is sound, but the map you wrote down is not a covering map (at least it's not obviously one to me).



          The space you're talking about is the mapping torus, and we can cover it with something called the mapping telescope.



          Let $Y_mathbbZ=sqcup (Xtimes[n,n+1])$, and let $widehatY$ be the quotient space of $Y_mathbbZ$ identifying $(x,n+1)$ and $(f(x),n+1)$, where the former is a right endpoint, and the latter a left endpoint. We can further write $widehatY_m$ as the image of $le m$ in $widehatY$.



          Now $widehatY$ is a covering space of your $Y$, with covering map $rho([x,n])=[x,npmod1]$. The sheets of this covering look like
          $$ rho^-1([x,t])=[f^m(x),t+m]mid minmathbbZ$$



          Now the deck transformations act on $widehatY$ via $p_m([x,n])=[f^m(x),n+m]$. Since this action is transitive on fibers, $rho_*pi_1(widehatY)$ is a normal subgroup of $pi_1(Y)$, and we also have $pi_1(Y)/rho_*pi_1(widehatY)congmathbbZ$, with $mathbbZ$ corresponding to those deck transformations. Since $mathbbZ$ is a free group, we actually have a split extension
          $$ pi_1(Y)congpi_1(widehatY)rtimesmathbbZ$$



          Finally, we have $pi_1(widehatY)congpi_1(X)$. That follows by describing an explicit homotopy equivalence between $X$ and $widehatY_m$ [for any $m$], and then reasoning via compactness that any map $alpha:S^1rightarrowwidehatY$ ends up in some $widehatY_m$. Note that we can actually describe the semidirect action as well, since we have the deck transformations above that generate the $mathbbZ$ factor. Namely, for $[alpha]inpi_1(X)$ and $minmathbbZ$, the action is given by
          $$ [alpha]^(m)=[f^m(alpha)]$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Sep 2 at 17:23









          Steve D

          2,7302622




          2,7302622




















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Someone suggested to me the following alternative approach. Pick a basepoint $astin X$ and consider the covering map $g : Yto S^1$ that sends $[x,t]$ to $exp(2 pi i t)$. This induces a map $g_*:pi_1(Y) to pi_1(S^1) = mathbb Z$. By picking a loop from the $ast$ to $f(ast)$, you can construct a splitting for $g_*$. This means that $pi_1(Y)$ is the semidirect product of $mathbb Z$ with the kernel of $g_*$, so it suffices to show that $ker g_*$ is $pi_1(X)$. The fibre of $g$ at the basepoint of $S^1$ is equal to the space obtained by glueing $X$ to $X$ along $f$, and since $f$ is an homeomorphism, this is just $X$. Since $pi_2(S^1)=0$, you obtain from the LES of a fibration what you wanted, a (split) exact sequence



              $$0to pi_1(X) to pi_1(Y)to mathbb Zto 0.$$






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                Someone suggested to me the following alternative approach. Pick a basepoint $astin X$ and consider the covering map $g : Yto S^1$ that sends $[x,t]$ to $exp(2 pi i t)$. This induces a map $g_*:pi_1(Y) to pi_1(S^1) = mathbb Z$. By picking a loop from the $ast$ to $f(ast)$, you can construct a splitting for $g_*$. This means that $pi_1(Y)$ is the semidirect product of $mathbb Z$ with the kernel of $g_*$, so it suffices to show that $ker g_*$ is $pi_1(X)$. The fibre of $g$ at the basepoint of $S^1$ is equal to the space obtained by glueing $X$ to $X$ along $f$, and since $f$ is an homeomorphism, this is just $X$. Since $pi_2(S^1)=0$, you obtain from the LES of a fibration what you wanted, a (split) exact sequence



                $$0to pi_1(X) to pi_1(Y)to mathbb Zto 0.$$






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  Someone suggested to me the following alternative approach. Pick a basepoint $astin X$ and consider the covering map $g : Yto S^1$ that sends $[x,t]$ to $exp(2 pi i t)$. This induces a map $g_*:pi_1(Y) to pi_1(S^1) = mathbb Z$. By picking a loop from the $ast$ to $f(ast)$, you can construct a splitting for $g_*$. This means that $pi_1(Y)$ is the semidirect product of $mathbb Z$ with the kernel of $g_*$, so it suffices to show that $ker g_*$ is $pi_1(X)$. The fibre of $g$ at the basepoint of $S^1$ is equal to the space obtained by glueing $X$ to $X$ along $f$, and since $f$ is an homeomorphism, this is just $X$. Since $pi_2(S^1)=0$, you obtain from the LES of a fibration what you wanted, a (split) exact sequence



                  $$0to pi_1(X) to pi_1(Y)to mathbb Zto 0.$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  Someone suggested to me the following alternative approach. Pick a basepoint $astin X$ and consider the covering map $g : Yto S^1$ that sends $[x,t]$ to $exp(2 pi i t)$. This induces a map $g_*:pi_1(Y) to pi_1(S^1) = mathbb Z$. By picking a loop from the $ast$ to $f(ast)$, you can construct a splitting for $g_*$. This means that $pi_1(Y)$ is the semidirect product of $mathbb Z$ with the kernel of $g_*$, so it suffices to show that $ker g_*$ is $pi_1(X)$. The fibre of $g$ at the basepoint of $S^1$ is equal to the space obtained by glueing $X$ to $X$ along $f$, and since $f$ is an homeomorphism, this is just $X$. Since $pi_2(S^1)=0$, you obtain from the LES of a fibration what you wanted, a (split) exact sequence



                  $$0to pi_1(X) to pi_1(Y)to mathbb Zto 0.$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Sep 2 at 17:55









                  Pedro Tamaroff♦

                  94.4k10144293




                  94.4k10144293



























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2902621%2ffundamental-group-of-a-quotient-of-a-cylinder%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      這個網誌中的熱門文章

                      Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

                      Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

                      Solve: $(3xy-2ay^2)dx+(x^2-2axy)dy=0$