Finding hidden horizontal asymptote
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Given the following function:
$$f(x)= frac3x-1 sqrt3x^2-2x+1$$
I want to find the horizontal asymptotes of it, I let the functionâÂÂs values go up to infinity and down go negative infinity in order to examine its behavior for growth and diminishing.
For calculating it neatly IâÂÂve multiplied both the numerator and the denominator by $frac1x$.
Then squared it and took a root of it at the denominator in order to get it under the original square root. After doing that and examine what would happen I found one horizontal asymptote at $y= sqrt3$ , but according to the answers thereâÂÂs another one in negative square root of three, what am I missing here?
calculus limits functions asymptotics graphing-functions
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Given the following function:
$$f(x)= frac3x-1 sqrt3x^2-2x+1$$
I want to find the horizontal asymptotes of it, I let the functionâÂÂs values go up to infinity and down go negative infinity in order to examine its behavior for growth and diminishing.
For calculating it neatly IâÂÂve multiplied both the numerator and the denominator by $frac1x$.
Then squared it and took a root of it at the denominator in order to get it under the original square root. After doing that and examine what would happen I found one horizontal asymptote at $y= sqrt3$ , but according to the answers thereâÂÂs another one in negative square root of three, what am I missing here?
calculus limits functions asymptotics graphing-functions
It's great that you showed your work, but would you mind showing the exact steps?
â Toby Mak
Sep 2 at 11:38
@TobyMak itâÂÂll be a pain in the arse writing it all through phone Latex :( the thing is that the numerator strived to 3 and the denominator to square root of three in both attempts to strive
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 11:40
YouâÂÂre asking others to spend their time helping you. ItâÂÂs only fair that you spend more of your own time, too.
â amd
Sep 2 at 20:45
@amd well thatâÂÂs really a nonsensical thing to say.. ItâÂÂs not that I didnâÂÂt try to convey my way of thinking at all. Not only that I did try, people understood my attempts completely by what I gave so that they granted me assistance based on it. Not only that this comment is nonsensical itâÂÂs rather futile because it isnâÂÂt helpful at all
â Ozk
Sep 3 at 4:12
Not at all. Just responding to your whining about having to do a bit of extra typing to help out someone whoâÂÂs willing to help you.
â amd
Sep 3 at 4:34
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Given the following function:
$$f(x)= frac3x-1 sqrt3x^2-2x+1$$
I want to find the horizontal asymptotes of it, I let the functionâÂÂs values go up to infinity and down go negative infinity in order to examine its behavior for growth and diminishing.
For calculating it neatly IâÂÂve multiplied both the numerator and the denominator by $frac1x$.
Then squared it and took a root of it at the denominator in order to get it under the original square root. After doing that and examine what would happen I found one horizontal asymptote at $y= sqrt3$ , but according to the answers thereâÂÂs another one in negative square root of three, what am I missing here?
calculus limits functions asymptotics graphing-functions
Given the following function:
$$f(x)= frac3x-1 sqrt3x^2-2x+1$$
I want to find the horizontal asymptotes of it, I let the functionâÂÂs values go up to infinity and down go negative infinity in order to examine its behavior for growth and diminishing.
For calculating it neatly IâÂÂve multiplied both the numerator and the denominator by $frac1x$.
Then squared it and took a root of it at the denominator in order to get it under the original square root. After doing that and examine what would happen I found one horizontal asymptote at $y= sqrt3$ , but according to the answers thereâÂÂs another one in negative square root of three, what am I missing here?
calculus limits functions asymptotics graphing-functions
calculus limits functions asymptotics graphing-functions
edited Sep 2 at 11:41
asked Sep 2 at 11:33
Ozk
1126
1126
It's great that you showed your work, but would you mind showing the exact steps?
â Toby Mak
Sep 2 at 11:38
@TobyMak itâÂÂll be a pain in the arse writing it all through phone Latex :( the thing is that the numerator strived to 3 and the denominator to square root of three in both attempts to strive
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 11:40
YouâÂÂre asking others to spend their time helping you. ItâÂÂs only fair that you spend more of your own time, too.
â amd
Sep 2 at 20:45
@amd well thatâÂÂs really a nonsensical thing to say.. ItâÂÂs not that I didnâÂÂt try to convey my way of thinking at all. Not only that I did try, people understood my attempts completely by what I gave so that they granted me assistance based on it. Not only that this comment is nonsensical itâÂÂs rather futile because it isnâÂÂt helpful at all
â Ozk
Sep 3 at 4:12
Not at all. Just responding to your whining about having to do a bit of extra typing to help out someone whoâÂÂs willing to help you.
â amd
Sep 3 at 4:34
 |Â
show 1 more comment
It's great that you showed your work, but would you mind showing the exact steps?
â Toby Mak
Sep 2 at 11:38
@TobyMak itâÂÂll be a pain in the arse writing it all through phone Latex :( the thing is that the numerator strived to 3 and the denominator to square root of three in both attempts to strive
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 11:40
YouâÂÂre asking others to spend their time helping you. ItâÂÂs only fair that you spend more of your own time, too.
â amd
Sep 2 at 20:45
@amd well thatâÂÂs really a nonsensical thing to say.. ItâÂÂs not that I didnâÂÂt try to convey my way of thinking at all. Not only that I did try, people understood my attempts completely by what I gave so that they granted me assistance based on it. Not only that this comment is nonsensical itâÂÂs rather futile because it isnâÂÂt helpful at all
â Ozk
Sep 3 at 4:12
Not at all. Just responding to your whining about having to do a bit of extra typing to help out someone whoâÂÂs willing to help you.
â amd
Sep 3 at 4:34
It's great that you showed your work, but would you mind showing the exact steps?
â Toby Mak
Sep 2 at 11:38
It's great that you showed your work, but would you mind showing the exact steps?
â Toby Mak
Sep 2 at 11:38
@TobyMak itâÂÂll be a pain in the arse writing it all through phone Latex :( the thing is that the numerator strived to 3 and the denominator to square root of three in both attempts to strive
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 11:40
@TobyMak itâÂÂll be a pain in the arse writing it all through phone Latex :( the thing is that the numerator strived to 3 and the denominator to square root of three in both attempts to strive
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 11:40
YouâÂÂre asking others to spend their time helping you. ItâÂÂs only fair that you spend more of your own time, too.
â amd
Sep 2 at 20:45
YouâÂÂre asking others to spend their time helping you. ItâÂÂs only fair that you spend more of your own time, too.
â amd
Sep 2 at 20:45
@amd well thatâÂÂs really a nonsensical thing to say.. ItâÂÂs not that I didnâÂÂt try to convey my way of thinking at all. Not only that I did try, people understood my attempts completely by what I gave so that they granted me assistance based on it. Not only that this comment is nonsensical itâÂÂs rather futile because it isnâÂÂt helpful at all
â Ozk
Sep 3 at 4:12
@amd well thatâÂÂs really a nonsensical thing to say.. ItâÂÂs not that I didnâÂÂt try to convey my way of thinking at all. Not only that I did try, people understood my attempts completely by what I gave so that they granted me assistance based on it. Not only that this comment is nonsensical itâÂÂs rather futile because it isnâÂÂt helpful at all
â Ozk
Sep 3 at 4:12
Not at all. Just responding to your whining about having to do a bit of extra typing to help out someone whoâÂÂs willing to help you.
â amd
Sep 3 at 4:34
Not at all. Just responding to your whining about having to do a bit of extra typing to help out someone whoâÂÂs willing to help you.
â amd
Sep 3 at 4:34
 |Â
show 1 more comment
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The shortest way is with equivalents:
$3x^2-2x+1sim_pminfty3x^2$, $;3x-1sim_pminfty3x$, so
$$ frac3x-1sqrt3x^2-2x+1sim_pminftyfrac3xsqrt3x^2=sqrt3,frac x=sqrt3,operatornamesgnx. $$
WhatâÂÂs that super super complicated but efficient method?
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 11:46
It's not complicated. It uses the basics of asymptotic calculus (big O, little o, equivalents functions, &c.)
â Bernard
Sep 2 at 11:48
But it doesnâÂÂt really make it any simpler because I have to evaluate the lim of x over absolute value of x in both cases
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 17:51
@Ozk: This quotient is the sign function, as I wrote it. It is constant, equal to $1$ on $mathbf R_+$, to $-1$ on $mathbf R_-$. I don't think this limit is so hardâ¦
â Bernard
Sep 2 at 18:32
Looked up for its graph, thatâÂÂs very simple indeed.
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 19:40
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
3
down vote
When we take $;xto -infty;$, we must change sign, otherwise that thing can not go into a square root (or any even root), thus: for $;x<<0;$, we have
$$frac-frac1x-frac1xcdotfrac3x-1sqrt3x^2-2x+1=frac-3+frac1xsqrt3-frac2x+frac1x^2xrightarrow[xto-infty]frac-3sqrt3=-sqrt3$$
Remember, $;sqrtx^2=|x|;$ , and thus: if $;x<0;$ , then $;sqrtx^2=-x;$ ...
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Your method works great when $x to infty$.
When $xto -infty$, you have to be a bit more careful. For $xto -infty$, we have eventually $x < 0$, so that $x = -|x| = -sqrtx^2$, giving rise to the other horizontal asymptote.
By that you mean that when x is approaching negative infinity then 1 over x approaching zero from the negative side? By the way didnâÂÂt really understand that transformation with the absolute value
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 11:43
@Ozk I just wanted to point out that, for negative $x$, you don't have $x = sqrtx^2$, but rather $x = -sqrtx^2$. Take for example $x = -1$. Then $sqrtx^2 = sqrt(-1)^2 = sqrt1 = 1$, so we need the minus sign in front.
â Sobi
Sep 2 at 11:44
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Note that the bottom is always positive but the top changes sign as your $x$ goes over $x=1/3$
Thus on the positive side you get a posives limit and on the negative side you get a negative limit.
YouâÂÂre right, but I donâÂÂt fully understand it, X approaches positive and negative infinity, why does its behavior around one third matters?
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 19:44
Other than that, the sign kinda cuts off when I divide by x
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 19:46
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The shortest way is with equivalents:
$3x^2-2x+1sim_pminfty3x^2$, $;3x-1sim_pminfty3x$, so
$$ frac3x-1sqrt3x^2-2x+1sim_pminftyfrac3xsqrt3x^2=sqrt3,frac x=sqrt3,operatornamesgnx. $$
WhatâÂÂs that super super complicated but efficient method?
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 11:46
It's not complicated. It uses the basics of asymptotic calculus (big O, little o, equivalents functions, &c.)
â Bernard
Sep 2 at 11:48
But it doesnâÂÂt really make it any simpler because I have to evaluate the lim of x over absolute value of x in both cases
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 17:51
@Ozk: This quotient is the sign function, as I wrote it. It is constant, equal to $1$ on $mathbf R_+$, to $-1$ on $mathbf R_-$. I don't think this limit is so hardâ¦
â Bernard
Sep 2 at 18:32
Looked up for its graph, thatâÂÂs very simple indeed.
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 19:40
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The shortest way is with equivalents:
$3x^2-2x+1sim_pminfty3x^2$, $;3x-1sim_pminfty3x$, so
$$ frac3x-1sqrt3x^2-2x+1sim_pminftyfrac3xsqrt3x^2=sqrt3,frac x=sqrt3,operatornamesgnx. $$
WhatâÂÂs that super super complicated but efficient method?
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 11:46
It's not complicated. It uses the basics of asymptotic calculus (big O, little o, equivalents functions, &c.)
â Bernard
Sep 2 at 11:48
But it doesnâÂÂt really make it any simpler because I have to evaluate the lim of x over absolute value of x in both cases
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 17:51
@Ozk: This quotient is the sign function, as I wrote it. It is constant, equal to $1$ on $mathbf R_+$, to $-1$ on $mathbf R_-$. I don't think this limit is so hardâ¦
â Bernard
Sep 2 at 18:32
Looked up for its graph, thatâÂÂs very simple indeed.
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 19:40
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The shortest way is with equivalents:
$3x^2-2x+1sim_pminfty3x^2$, $;3x-1sim_pminfty3x$, so
$$ frac3x-1sqrt3x^2-2x+1sim_pminftyfrac3xsqrt3x^2=sqrt3,frac x=sqrt3,operatornamesgnx. $$
The shortest way is with equivalents:
$3x^2-2x+1sim_pminfty3x^2$, $;3x-1sim_pminfty3x$, so
$$ frac3x-1sqrt3x^2-2x+1sim_pminftyfrac3xsqrt3x^2=sqrt3,frac x=sqrt3,operatornamesgnx. $$
answered Sep 2 at 11:45
Bernard
112k635104
112k635104
WhatâÂÂs that super super complicated but efficient method?
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 11:46
It's not complicated. It uses the basics of asymptotic calculus (big O, little o, equivalents functions, &c.)
â Bernard
Sep 2 at 11:48
But it doesnâÂÂt really make it any simpler because I have to evaluate the lim of x over absolute value of x in both cases
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 17:51
@Ozk: This quotient is the sign function, as I wrote it. It is constant, equal to $1$ on $mathbf R_+$, to $-1$ on $mathbf R_-$. I don't think this limit is so hardâ¦
â Bernard
Sep 2 at 18:32
Looked up for its graph, thatâÂÂs very simple indeed.
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 19:40
 |Â
show 1 more comment
WhatâÂÂs that super super complicated but efficient method?
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 11:46
It's not complicated. It uses the basics of asymptotic calculus (big O, little o, equivalents functions, &c.)
â Bernard
Sep 2 at 11:48
But it doesnâÂÂt really make it any simpler because I have to evaluate the lim of x over absolute value of x in both cases
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 17:51
@Ozk: This quotient is the sign function, as I wrote it. It is constant, equal to $1$ on $mathbf R_+$, to $-1$ on $mathbf R_-$. I don't think this limit is so hardâ¦
â Bernard
Sep 2 at 18:32
Looked up for its graph, thatâÂÂs very simple indeed.
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 19:40
WhatâÂÂs that super super complicated but efficient method?
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 11:46
WhatâÂÂs that super super complicated but efficient method?
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 11:46
It's not complicated. It uses the basics of asymptotic calculus (big O, little o, equivalents functions, &c.)
â Bernard
Sep 2 at 11:48
It's not complicated. It uses the basics of asymptotic calculus (big O, little o, equivalents functions, &c.)
â Bernard
Sep 2 at 11:48
But it doesnâÂÂt really make it any simpler because I have to evaluate the lim of x over absolute value of x in both cases
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 17:51
But it doesnâÂÂt really make it any simpler because I have to evaluate the lim of x over absolute value of x in both cases
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 17:51
@Ozk: This quotient is the sign function, as I wrote it. It is constant, equal to $1$ on $mathbf R_+$, to $-1$ on $mathbf R_-$. I don't think this limit is so hardâ¦
â Bernard
Sep 2 at 18:32
@Ozk: This quotient is the sign function, as I wrote it. It is constant, equal to $1$ on $mathbf R_+$, to $-1$ on $mathbf R_-$. I don't think this limit is so hardâ¦
â Bernard
Sep 2 at 18:32
Looked up for its graph, thatâÂÂs very simple indeed.
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 19:40
Looked up for its graph, thatâÂÂs very simple indeed.
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 19:40
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
3
down vote
When we take $;xto -infty;$, we must change sign, otherwise that thing can not go into a square root (or any even root), thus: for $;x<<0;$, we have
$$frac-frac1x-frac1xcdotfrac3x-1sqrt3x^2-2x+1=frac-3+frac1xsqrt3-frac2x+frac1x^2xrightarrow[xto-infty]frac-3sqrt3=-sqrt3$$
Remember, $;sqrtx^2=|x|;$ , and thus: if $;x<0;$ , then $;sqrtx^2=-x;$ ...
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
When we take $;xto -infty;$, we must change sign, otherwise that thing can not go into a square root (or any even root), thus: for $;x<<0;$, we have
$$frac-frac1x-frac1xcdotfrac3x-1sqrt3x^2-2x+1=frac-3+frac1xsqrt3-frac2x+frac1x^2xrightarrow[xto-infty]frac-3sqrt3=-sqrt3$$
Remember, $;sqrtx^2=|x|;$ , and thus: if $;x<0;$ , then $;sqrtx^2=-x;$ ...
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
When we take $;xto -infty;$, we must change sign, otherwise that thing can not go into a square root (or any even root), thus: for $;x<<0;$, we have
$$frac-frac1x-frac1xcdotfrac3x-1sqrt3x^2-2x+1=frac-3+frac1xsqrt3-frac2x+frac1x^2xrightarrow[xto-infty]frac-3sqrt3=-sqrt3$$
Remember, $;sqrtx^2=|x|;$ , and thus: if $;x<0;$ , then $;sqrtx^2=-x;$ ...
When we take $;xto -infty;$, we must change sign, otherwise that thing can not go into a square root (or any even root), thus: for $;x<<0;$, we have
$$frac-frac1x-frac1xcdotfrac3x-1sqrt3x^2-2x+1=frac-3+frac1xsqrt3-frac2x+frac1x^2xrightarrow[xto-infty]frac-3sqrt3=-sqrt3$$
Remember, $;sqrtx^2=|x|;$ , and thus: if $;x<0;$ , then $;sqrtx^2=-x;$ ...
answered Sep 2 at 11:43
DonAntonio
173k1486220
173k1486220
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Your method works great when $x to infty$.
When $xto -infty$, you have to be a bit more careful. For $xto -infty$, we have eventually $x < 0$, so that $x = -|x| = -sqrtx^2$, giving rise to the other horizontal asymptote.
By that you mean that when x is approaching negative infinity then 1 over x approaching zero from the negative side? By the way didnâÂÂt really understand that transformation with the absolute value
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 11:43
@Ozk I just wanted to point out that, for negative $x$, you don't have $x = sqrtx^2$, but rather $x = -sqrtx^2$. Take for example $x = -1$. Then $sqrtx^2 = sqrt(-1)^2 = sqrt1 = 1$, so we need the minus sign in front.
â Sobi
Sep 2 at 11:44
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Your method works great when $x to infty$.
When $xto -infty$, you have to be a bit more careful. For $xto -infty$, we have eventually $x < 0$, so that $x = -|x| = -sqrtx^2$, giving rise to the other horizontal asymptote.
By that you mean that when x is approaching negative infinity then 1 over x approaching zero from the negative side? By the way didnâÂÂt really understand that transformation with the absolute value
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 11:43
@Ozk I just wanted to point out that, for negative $x$, you don't have $x = sqrtx^2$, but rather $x = -sqrtx^2$. Take for example $x = -1$. Then $sqrtx^2 = sqrt(-1)^2 = sqrt1 = 1$, so we need the minus sign in front.
â Sobi
Sep 2 at 11:44
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Your method works great when $x to infty$.
When $xto -infty$, you have to be a bit more careful. For $xto -infty$, we have eventually $x < 0$, so that $x = -|x| = -sqrtx^2$, giving rise to the other horizontal asymptote.
Your method works great when $x to infty$.
When $xto -infty$, you have to be a bit more careful. For $xto -infty$, we have eventually $x < 0$, so that $x = -|x| = -sqrtx^2$, giving rise to the other horizontal asymptote.
answered Sep 2 at 11:41
Sobi
2,845417
2,845417
By that you mean that when x is approaching negative infinity then 1 over x approaching zero from the negative side? By the way didnâÂÂt really understand that transformation with the absolute value
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 11:43
@Ozk I just wanted to point out that, for negative $x$, you don't have $x = sqrtx^2$, but rather $x = -sqrtx^2$. Take for example $x = -1$. Then $sqrtx^2 = sqrt(-1)^2 = sqrt1 = 1$, so we need the minus sign in front.
â Sobi
Sep 2 at 11:44
add a comment |Â
By that you mean that when x is approaching negative infinity then 1 over x approaching zero from the negative side? By the way didnâÂÂt really understand that transformation with the absolute value
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 11:43
@Ozk I just wanted to point out that, for negative $x$, you don't have $x = sqrtx^2$, but rather $x = -sqrtx^2$. Take for example $x = -1$. Then $sqrtx^2 = sqrt(-1)^2 = sqrt1 = 1$, so we need the minus sign in front.
â Sobi
Sep 2 at 11:44
By that you mean that when x is approaching negative infinity then 1 over x approaching zero from the negative side? By the way didnâÂÂt really understand that transformation with the absolute value
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 11:43
By that you mean that when x is approaching negative infinity then 1 over x approaching zero from the negative side? By the way didnâÂÂt really understand that transformation with the absolute value
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 11:43
@Ozk I just wanted to point out that, for negative $x$, you don't have $x = sqrtx^2$, but rather $x = -sqrtx^2$. Take for example $x = -1$. Then $sqrtx^2 = sqrt(-1)^2 = sqrt1 = 1$, so we need the minus sign in front.
â Sobi
Sep 2 at 11:44
@Ozk I just wanted to point out that, for negative $x$, you don't have $x = sqrtx^2$, but rather $x = -sqrtx^2$. Take for example $x = -1$. Then $sqrtx^2 = sqrt(-1)^2 = sqrt1 = 1$, so we need the minus sign in front.
â Sobi
Sep 2 at 11:44
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Note that the bottom is always positive but the top changes sign as your $x$ goes over $x=1/3$
Thus on the positive side you get a posives limit and on the negative side you get a negative limit.
YouâÂÂre right, but I donâÂÂt fully understand it, X approaches positive and negative infinity, why does its behavior around one third matters?
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 19:44
Other than that, the sign kinda cuts off when I divide by x
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 19:46
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Note that the bottom is always positive but the top changes sign as your $x$ goes over $x=1/3$
Thus on the positive side you get a posives limit and on the negative side you get a negative limit.
YouâÂÂre right, but I donâÂÂt fully understand it, X approaches positive and negative infinity, why does its behavior around one third matters?
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 19:44
Other than that, the sign kinda cuts off when I divide by x
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 19:46
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Note that the bottom is always positive but the top changes sign as your $x$ goes over $x=1/3$
Thus on the positive side you get a posives limit and on the negative side you get a negative limit.
Note that the bottom is always positive but the top changes sign as your $x$ goes over $x=1/3$
Thus on the positive side you get a posives limit and on the negative side you get a negative limit.
answered Sep 2 at 11:53
Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
31.3k41853
31.3k41853
YouâÂÂre right, but I donâÂÂt fully understand it, X approaches positive and negative infinity, why does its behavior around one third matters?
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 19:44
Other than that, the sign kinda cuts off when I divide by x
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 19:46
add a comment |Â
YouâÂÂre right, but I donâÂÂt fully understand it, X approaches positive and negative infinity, why does its behavior around one third matters?
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 19:44
Other than that, the sign kinda cuts off when I divide by x
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 19:46
YouâÂÂre right, but I donâÂÂt fully understand it, X approaches positive and negative infinity, why does its behavior around one third matters?
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 19:44
YouâÂÂre right, but I donâÂÂt fully understand it, X approaches positive and negative infinity, why does its behavior around one third matters?
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 19:44
Other than that, the sign kinda cuts off when I divide by x
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 19:46
Other than that, the sign kinda cuts off when I divide by x
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 19:46
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2902624%2ffinding-hidden-horizontal-asymptote%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
It's great that you showed your work, but would you mind showing the exact steps?
â Toby Mak
Sep 2 at 11:38
@TobyMak itâÂÂll be a pain in the arse writing it all through phone Latex :( the thing is that the numerator strived to 3 and the denominator to square root of three in both attempts to strive
â Ozk
Sep 2 at 11:40
YouâÂÂre asking others to spend their time helping you. ItâÂÂs only fair that you spend more of your own time, too.
â amd
Sep 2 at 20:45
@amd well thatâÂÂs really a nonsensical thing to say.. ItâÂÂs not that I didnâÂÂt try to convey my way of thinking at all. Not only that I did try, people understood my attempts completely by what I gave so that they granted me assistance based on it. Not only that this comment is nonsensical itâÂÂs rather futile because it isnâÂÂt helpful at all
â Ozk
Sep 3 at 4:12
Not at all. Just responding to your whining about having to do a bit of extra typing to help out someone whoâÂÂs willing to help you.
â amd
Sep 3 at 4:34