How to prove a probability measure is relatively compactï¼Â
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
$mu_alpha$ is a series of probability measure corresponding to random variables $X_alpha$. If $exists r>0,M>0,s.t.forall alpha,mathbb E|X_alpha|^r<M,$ then $mu_alpha$ is relatively compact.
I know that if $X_alpha$ is defined in a complete separable space, then I just need to prove $mu_alpha$ is tight based on 'prohorov theorem' and it will be easier .
But generally, how can I get this statement?
Thanks for your help.
probability sequences-and-series measure-theory
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
$mu_alpha$ is a series of probability measure corresponding to random variables $X_alpha$. If $exists r>0,M>0,s.t.forall alpha,mathbb E|X_alpha|^r<M,$ then $mu_alpha$ is relatively compact.
I know that if $X_alpha$ is defined in a complete separable space, then I just need to prove $mu_alpha$ is tight based on 'prohorov theorem' and it will be easier .
But generally, how can I get this statement?
Thanks for your help.
probability sequences-and-series measure-theory
1
I really don't think you're going to get any general answer. I mean, write down that expected value and see if you can bound it... or... try other things...
â Jack M
Sep 2 at 9:19
@ Jack M I mean if $X_alpha$ is defined in a general metric space, how can I prove this statement
â HQR
Sep 2 at 9:31
You are asking, why does a uniform moment bound imply tightness?
â kimchi lover
Sep 2 at 12:00
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
$mu_alpha$ is a series of probability measure corresponding to random variables $X_alpha$. If $exists r>0,M>0,s.t.forall alpha,mathbb E|X_alpha|^r<M,$ then $mu_alpha$ is relatively compact.
I know that if $X_alpha$ is defined in a complete separable space, then I just need to prove $mu_alpha$ is tight based on 'prohorov theorem' and it will be easier .
But generally, how can I get this statement?
Thanks for your help.
probability sequences-and-series measure-theory
$mu_alpha$ is a series of probability measure corresponding to random variables $X_alpha$. If $exists r>0,M>0,s.t.forall alpha,mathbb E|X_alpha|^r<M,$ then $mu_alpha$ is relatively compact.
I know that if $X_alpha$ is defined in a complete separable space, then I just need to prove $mu_alpha$ is tight based on 'prohorov theorem' and it will be easier .
But generally, how can I get this statement?
Thanks for your help.
probability sequences-and-series measure-theory
probability sequences-and-series measure-theory
edited Sep 2 at 9:33
asked Sep 2 at 9:02
HQR
329113
329113
1
I really don't think you're going to get any general answer. I mean, write down that expected value and see if you can bound it... or... try other things...
â Jack M
Sep 2 at 9:19
@ Jack M I mean if $X_alpha$ is defined in a general metric space, how can I prove this statement
â HQR
Sep 2 at 9:31
You are asking, why does a uniform moment bound imply tightness?
â kimchi lover
Sep 2 at 12:00
add a comment |Â
1
I really don't think you're going to get any general answer. I mean, write down that expected value and see if you can bound it... or... try other things...
â Jack M
Sep 2 at 9:19
@ Jack M I mean if $X_alpha$ is defined in a general metric space, how can I prove this statement
â HQR
Sep 2 at 9:31
You are asking, why does a uniform moment bound imply tightness?
â kimchi lover
Sep 2 at 12:00
1
1
I really don't think you're going to get any general answer. I mean, write down that expected value and see if you can bound it... or... try other things...
â Jack M
Sep 2 at 9:19
I really don't think you're going to get any general answer. I mean, write down that expected value and see if you can bound it... or... try other things...
â Jack M
Sep 2 at 9:19
@ Jack M I mean if $X_alpha$ is defined in a general metric space, how can I prove this statement
â HQR
Sep 2 at 9:31
@ Jack M I mean if $X_alpha$ is defined in a general metric space, how can I prove this statement
â HQR
Sep 2 at 9:31
You are asking, why does a uniform moment bound imply tightness?
â kimchi lover
Sep 2 at 12:00
You are asking, why does a uniform moment bound imply tightness?
â kimchi lover
Sep 2 at 12:00
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
If I understand the question correctly $mu_alpha$ is a family of Borel probability measures on $mathbb R$ with $sup _alpha int |x|^r, dmu (x) <infty$ and you want to show that $mu_alpha$ is tight. The domain of $X_alpha$'s does not come i not the picture at all. (You are probably saying that the basic probability space is a complete separable metric space with some given Borel probability measure but this has no realtion to the tightness question). Since $mu_alpha x: leq frac 1 A^r sup _alpha int |x|^r, dmu_alpha (x)$ we see that $mu_alpha$ is tight. PS: if the random variables take values in a metric space then $E|X_alpha|^r$ does not even make sense, so I am assuming that $X_alpha$'s are real valued.
Thanks very much.Maybe you are right.
â HQR
Sep 3 at 1:17
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
If I understand the question correctly $mu_alpha$ is a family of Borel probability measures on $mathbb R$ with $sup _alpha int |x|^r, dmu (x) <infty$ and you want to show that $mu_alpha$ is tight. The domain of $X_alpha$'s does not come i not the picture at all. (You are probably saying that the basic probability space is a complete separable metric space with some given Borel probability measure but this has no realtion to the tightness question). Since $mu_alpha x: leq frac 1 A^r sup _alpha int |x|^r, dmu_alpha (x)$ we see that $mu_alpha$ is tight. PS: if the random variables take values in a metric space then $E|X_alpha|^r$ does not even make sense, so I am assuming that $X_alpha$'s are real valued.
Thanks very much.Maybe you are right.
â HQR
Sep 3 at 1:17
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
If I understand the question correctly $mu_alpha$ is a family of Borel probability measures on $mathbb R$ with $sup _alpha int |x|^r, dmu (x) <infty$ and you want to show that $mu_alpha$ is tight. The domain of $X_alpha$'s does not come i not the picture at all. (You are probably saying that the basic probability space is a complete separable metric space with some given Borel probability measure but this has no realtion to the tightness question). Since $mu_alpha x: leq frac 1 A^r sup _alpha int |x|^r, dmu_alpha (x)$ we see that $mu_alpha$ is tight. PS: if the random variables take values in a metric space then $E|X_alpha|^r$ does not even make sense, so I am assuming that $X_alpha$'s are real valued.
Thanks very much.Maybe you are right.
â HQR
Sep 3 at 1:17
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
If I understand the question correctly $mu_alpha$ is a family of Borel probability measures on $mathbb R$ with $sup _alpha int |x|^r, dmu (x) <infty$ and you want to show that $mu_alpha$ is tight. The domain of $X_alpha$'s does not come i not the picture at all. (You are probably saying that the basic probability space is a complete separable metric space with some given Borel probability measure but this has no realtion to the tightness question). Since $mu_alpha x: leq frac 1 A^r sup _alpha int |x|^r, dmu_alpha (x)$ we see that $mu_alpha$ is tight. PS: if the random variables take values in a metric space then $E|X_alpha|^r$ does not even make sense, so I am assuming that $X_alpha$'s are real valued.
If I understand the question correctly $mu_alpha$ is a family of Borel probability measures on $mathbb R$ with $sup _alpha int |x|^r, dmu (x) <infty$ and you want to show that $mu_alpha$ is tight. The domain of $X_alpha$'s does not come i not the picture at all. (You are probably saying that the basic probability space is a complete separable metric space with some given Borel probability measure but this has no realtion to the tightness question). Since $mu_alpha x: leq frac 1 A^r sup _alpha int |x|^r, dmu_alpha (x)$ we see that $mu_alpha$ is tight. PS: if the random variables take values in a metric space then $E|X_alpha|^r$ does not even make sense, so I am assuming that $X_alpha$'s are real valued.
answered Sep 2 at 12:25
Kavi Rama Murthy
25.8k31435
25.8k31435
Thanks very much.Maybe you are right.
â HQR
Sep 3 at 1:17
add a comment |Â
Thanks very much.Maybe you are right.
â HQR
Sep 3 at 1:17
Thanks very much.Maybe you are right.
â HQR
Sep 3 at 1:17
Thanks very much.Maybe you are right.
â HQR
Sep 3 at 1:17
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2902513%2fhow-to-prove-a-probability-measure-is-relatively-compact%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
I really don't think you're going to get any general answer. I mean, write down that expected value and see if you can bound it... or... try other things...
â Jack M
Sep 2 at 9:19
@ Jack M I mean if $X_alpha$ is defined in a general metric space, how can I prove this statement
â HQR
Sep 2 at 9:31
You are asking, why does a uniform moment bound imply tightness?
â kimchi lover
Sep 2 at 12:00