How to prove a probability measure is relatively compact?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












$mu_alpha$ is a series of probability measure corresponding to random variables $X_alpha$. If $exists r>0,M>0,s.t.forall alpha,mathbb E|X_alpha|^r<M,$ then $mu_alpha$ is relatively compact.



I know that if $X_alpha$ is defined in a complete separable space, then I just need to prove $mu_alpha$ is tight based on 'prohorov theorem' and it will be easier .



But generally, how can I get this statement?



Thanks for your help.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    I really don't think you're going to get any general answer. I mean, write down that expected value and see if you can bound it... or... try other things...
    – Jack M
    Sep 2 at 9:19











  • @ Jack M I mean if $X_alpha$ is defined in a general metric space, how can I prove this statement
    – HQR
    Sep 2 at 9:31










  • You are asking, why does a uniform moment bound imply tightness?
    – kimchi lover
    Sep 2 at 12:00














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












$mu_alpha$ is a series of probability measure corresponding to random variables $X_alpha$. If $exists r>0,M>0,s.t.forall alpha,mathbb E|X_alpha|^r<M,$ then $mu_alpha$ is relatively compact.



I know that if $X_alpha$ is defined in a complete separable space, then I just need to prove $mu_alpha$ is tight based on 'prohorov theorem' and it will be easier .



But generally, how can I get this statement?



Thanks for your help.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    I really don't think you're going to get any general answer. I mean, write down that expected value and see if you can bound it... or... try other things...
    – Jack M
    Sep 2 at 9:19











  • @ Jack M I mean if $X_alpha$ is defined in a general metric space, how can I prove this statement
    – HQR
    Sep 2 at 9:31










  • You are asking, why does a uniform moment bound imply tightness?
    – kimchi lover
    Sep 2 at 12:00












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











$mu_alpha$ is a series of probability measure corresponding to random variables $X_alpha$. If $exists r>0,M>0,s.t.forall alpha,mathbb E|X_alpha|^r<M,$ then $mu_alpha$ is relatively compact.



I know that if $X_alpha$ is defined in a complete separable space, then I just need to prove $mu_alpha$ is tight based on 'prohorov theorem' and it will be easier .



But generally, how can I get this statement?



Thanks for your help.










share|cite|improve this question















$mu_alpha$ is a series of probability measure corresponding to random variables $X_alpha$. If $exists r>0,M>0,s.t.forall alpha,mathbb E|X_alpha|^r<M,$ then $mu_alpha$ is relatively compact.



I know that if $X_alpha$ is defined in a complete separable space, then I just need to prove $mu_alpha$ is tight based on 'prohorov theorem' and it will be easier .



But generally, how can I get this statement?



Thanks for your help.







probability sequences-and-series measure-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Sep 2 at 9:33

























asked Sep 2 at 9:02









HQR

329113




329113







  • 1




    I really don't think you're going to get any general answer. I mean, write down that expected value and see if you can bound it... or... try other things...
    – Jack M
    Sep 2 at 9:19











  • @ Jack M I mean if $X_alpha$ is defined in a general metric space, how can I prove this statement
    – HQR
    Sep 2 at 9:31










  • You are asking, why does a uniform moment bound imply tightness?
    – kimchi lover
    Sep 2 at 12:00












  • 1




    I really don't think you're going to get any general answer. I mean, write down that expected value and see if you can bound it... or... try other things...
    – Jack M
    Sep 2 at 9:19











  • @ Jack M I mean if $X_alpha$ is defined in a general metric space, how can I prove this statement
    – HQR
    Sep 2 at 9:31










  • You are asking, why does a uniform moment bound imply tightness?
    – kimchi lover
    Sep 2 at 12:00







1




1




I really don't think you're going to get any general answer. I mean, write down that expected value and see if you can bound it... or... try other things...
– Jack M
Sep 2 at 9:19





I really don't think you're going to get any general answer. I mean, write down that expected value and see if you can bound it... or... try other things...
– Jack M
Sep 2 at 9:19













@ Jack M I mean if $X_alpha$ is defined in a general metric space, how can I prove this statement
– HQR
Sep 2 at 9:31




@ Jack M I mean if $X_alpha$ is defined in a general metric space, how can I prove this statement
– HQR
Sep 2 at 9:31












You are asking, why does a uniform moment bound imply tightness?
– kimchi lover
Sep 2 at 12:00




You are asking, why does a uniform moment bound imply tightness?
– kimchi lover
Sep 2 at 12:00










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










If I understand the question correctly $mu_alpha$ is a family of Borel probability measures on $mathbb R$ with $sup _alpha int |x|^r, dmu (x) <infty$ and you want to show that $mu_alpha$ is tight. The domain of $X_alpha$'s does not come i not the picture at all. (You are probably saying that the basic probability space is a complete separable metric space with some given Borel probability measure but this has no realtion to the tightness question). Since $mu_alpha x: leq frac 1 A^r sup _alpha int |x|^r, dmu_alpha (x)$ we see that $mu_alpha$ is tight. PS: if the random variables take values in a metric space then $E|X_alpha|^r$ does not even make sense, so I am assuming that $X_alpha$'s are real valued.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Thanks very much.Maybe you are right.
    – HQR
    Sep 3 at 1:17










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2902513%2fhow-to-prove-a-probability-measure-is-relatively-compact%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










If I understand the question correctly $mu_alpha$ is a family of Borel probability measures on $mathbb R$ with $sup _alpha int |x|^r, dmu (x) <infty$ and you want to show that $mu_alpha$ is tight. The domain of $X_alpha$'s does not come i not the picture at all. (You are probably saying that the basic probability space is a complete separable metric space with some given Borel probability measure but this has no realtion to the tightness question). Since $mu_alpha x: leq frac 1 A^r sup _alpha int |x|^r, dmu_alpha (x)$ we see that $mu_alpha$ is tight. PS: if the random variables take values in a metric space then $E|X_alpha|^r$ does not even make sense, so I am assuming that $X_alpha$'s are real valued.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Thanks very much.Maybe you are right.
    – HQR
    Sep 3 at 1:17














up vote
2
down vote



accepted










If I understand the question correctly $mu_alpha$ is a family of Borel probability measures on $mathbb R$ with $sup _alpha int |x|^r, dmu (x) <infty$ and you want to show that $mu_alpha$ is tight. The domain of $X_alpha$'s does not come i not the picture at all. (You are probably saying that the basic probability space is a complete separable metric space with some given Borel probability measure but this has no realtion to the tightness question). Since $mu_alpha x: leq frac 1 A^r sup _alpha int |x|^r, dmu_alpha (x)$ we see that $mu_alpha$ is tight. PS: if the random variables take values in a metric space then $E|X_alpha|^r$ does not even make sense, so I am assuming that $X_alpha$'s are real valued.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Thanks very much.Maybe you are right.
    – HQR
    Sep 3 at 1:17












up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






If I understand the question correctly $mu_alpha$ is a family of Borel probability measures on $mathbb R$ with $sup _alpha int |x|^r, dmu (x) <infty$ and you want to show that $mu_alpha$ is tight. The domain of $X_alpha$'s does not come i not the picture at all. (You are probably saying that the basic probability space is a complete separable metric space with some given Borel probability measure but this has no realtion to the tightness question). Since $mu_alpha x: leq frac 1 A^r sup _alpha int |x|^r, dmu_alpha (x)$ we see that $mu_alpha$ is tight. PS: if the random variables take values in a metric space then $E|X_alpha|^r$ does not even make sense, so I am assuming that $X_alpha$'s are real valued.






share|cite|improve this answer












If I understand the question correctly $mu_alpha$ is a family of Borel probability measures on $mathbb R$ with $sup _alpha int |x|^r, dmu (x) <infty$ and you want to show that $mu_alpha$ is tight. The domain of $X_alpha$'s does not come i not the picture at all. (You are probably saying that the basic probability space is a complete separable metric space with some given Borel probability measure but this has no realtion to the tightness question). Since $mu_alpha x: leq frac 1 A^r sup _alpha int |x|^r, dmu_alpha (x)$ we see that $mu_alpha$ is tight. PS: if the random variables take values in a metric space then $E|X_alpha|^r$ does not even make sense, so I am assuming that $X_alpha$'s are real valued.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Sep 2 at 12:25









Kavi Rama Murthy

25.8k31435




25.8k31435











  • Thanks very much.Maybe you are right.
    – HQR
    Sep 3 at 1:17
















  • Thanks very much.Maybe you are right.
    – HQR
    Sep 3 at 1:17















Thanks very much.Maybe you are right.
– HQR
Sep 3 at 1:17




Thanks very much.Maybe you are right.
– HQR
Sep 3 at 1:17

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2902513%2fhow-to-prove-a-probability-measure-is-relatively-compact%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Carbon dioxide

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?