Proving the geometric series $sum_i=0^n r^i = frac1-r^n+11-r$ by induction for $ngeq 1$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2












Let $P(n)$ be the statement
$$
P(n) : sumlimits^n_i=0r^i = dfrac1-r^1+n1-rtext for all n in mathbbNtext.
$$
I am stuck at the base case:
$$P(1):1 + r = dfrac1-r^21-rtext.$$



I am stuck as to how I can show $P(1)$ is true.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 3




    Hint: $a^2-b^2=(a+b)(a-b)$
    – user105475
    Aug 14 '14 at 1:42










  • Base Case is P(0) not P(1)
    – user137481
    Aug 14 '14 at 1:42










  • @user137481 Natural Numbers start at 1 ... so should the base case not be P(1)
    – Guest
    Aug 14 '14 at 1:43






  • 1




    That depends on your teacher. In some courses, Natural Numbers start at 0
    – user137481
    Aug 14 '14 at 1:47






  • 1




    Note that the problem really should have specified that $rne 1$. As to the base case, it depends on the exact statement of the problem. If we are asked to prove the result is true for every natural number $n$, then the base case is $n=1$. If we are asked to prove the result holds for every non-negative integer, then the base case is $n=0$.
    – André Nicolas
    Aug 14 '14 at 1:48














up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2












Let $P(n)$ be the statement
$$
P(n) : sumlimits^n_i=0r^i = dfrac1-r^1+n1-rtext for all n in mathbbNtext.
$$
I am stuck at the base case:
$$P(1):1 + r = dfrac1-r^21-rtext.$$



I am stuck as to how I can show $P(1)$ is true.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 3




    Hint: $a^2-b^2=(a+b)(a-b)$
    – user105475
    Aug 14 '14 at 1:42










  • Base Case is P(0) not P(1)
    – user137481
    Aug 14 '14 at 1:42










  • @user137481 Natural Numbers start at 1 ... so should the base case not be P(1)
    – Guest
    Aug 14 '14 at 1:43






  • 1




    That depends on your teacher. In some courses, Natural Numbers start at 0
    – user137481
    Aug 14 '14 at 1:47






  • 1




    Note that the problem really should have specified that $rne 1$. As to the base case, it depends on the exact statement of the problem. If we are asked to prove the result is true for every natural number $n$, then the base case is $n=1$. If we are asked to prove the result holds for every non-negative integer, then the base case is $n=0$.
    – André Nicolas
    Aug 14 '14 at 1:48












up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2






2





Let $P(n)$ be the statement
$$
P(n) : sumlimits^n_i=0r^i = dfrac1-r^1+n1-rtext for all n in mathbbNtext.
$$
I am stuck at the base case:
$$P(1):1 + r = dfrac1-r^21-rtext.$$



I am stuck as to how I can show $P(1)$ is true.










share|cite|improve this question















Let $P(n)$ be the statement
$$
P(n) : sumlimits^n_i=0r^i = dfrac1-r^1+n1-rtext for all n in mathbbNtext.
$$
I am stuck at the base case:
$$P(1):1 + r = dfrac1-r^21-rtext.$$



I am stuck as to how I can show $P(1)$ is true.







proof-writing induction






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 23 '15 at 16:36









Daniel W. Farlow

17.3k114187




17.3k114187










asked Aug 14 '14 at 1:40









Guest

17311




17311







  • 3




    Hint: $a^2-b^2=(a+b)(a-b)$
    – user105475
    Aug 14 '14 at 1:42










  • Base Case is P(0) not P(1)
    – user137481
    Aug 14 '14 at 1:42










  • @user137481 Natural Numbers start at 1 ... so should the base case not be P(1)
    – Guest
    Aug 14 '14 at 1:43






  • 1




    That depends on your teacher. In some courses, Natural Numbers start at 0
    – user137481
    Aug 14 '14 at 1:47






  • 1




    Note that the problem really should have specified that $rne 1$. As to the base case, it depends on the exact statement of the problem. If we are asked to prove the result is true for every natural number $n$, then the base case is $n=1$. If we are asked to prove the result holds for every non-negative integer, then the base case is $n=0$.
    – André Nicolas
    Aug 14 '14 at 1:48












  • 3




    Hint: $a^2-b^2=(a+b)(a-b)$
    – user105475
    Aug 14 '14 at 1:42










  • Base Case is P(0) not P(1)
    – user137481
    Aug 14 '14 at 1:42










  • @user137481 Natural Numbers start at 1 ... so should the base case not be P(1)
    – Guest
    Aug 14 '14 at 1:43






  • 1




    That depends on your teacher. In some courses, Natural Numbers start at 0
    – user137481
    Aug 14 '14 at 1:47






  • 1




    Note that the problem really should have specified that $rne 1$. As to the base case, it depends on the exact statement of the problem. If we are asked to prove the result is true for every natural number $n$, then the base case is $n=1$. If we are asked to prove the result holds for every non-negative integer, then the base case is $n=0$.
    – André Nicolas
    Aug 14 '14 at 1:48







3




3




Hint: $a^2-b^2=(a+b)(a-b)$
– user105475
Aug 14 '14 at 1:42




Hint: $a^2-b^2=(a+b)(a-b)$
– user105475
Aug 14 '14 at 1:42












Base Case is P(0) not P(1)
– user137481
Aug 14 '14 at 1:42




Base Case is P(0) not P(1)
– user137481
Aug 14 '14 at 1:42












@user137481 Natural Numbers start at 1 ... so should the base case not be P(1)
– Guest
Aug 14 '14 at 1:43




@user137481 Natural Numbers start at 1 ... so should the base case not be P(1)
– Guest
Aug 14 '14 at 1:43




1




1




That depends on your teacher. In some courses, Natural Numbers start at 0
– user137481
Aug 14 '14 at 1:47




That depends on your teacher. In some courses, Natural Numbers start at 0
– user137481
Aug 14 '14 at 1:47




1




1




Note that the problem really should have specified that $rne 1$. As to the base case, it depends on the exact statement of the problem. If we are asked to prove the result is true for every natural number $n$, then the base case is $n=1$. If we are asked to prove the result holds for every non-negative integer, then the base case is $n=0$.
– André Nicolas
Aug 14 '14 at 1:48




Note that the problem really should have specified that $rne 1$. As to the base case, it depends on the exact statement of the problem. If we are asked to prove the result is true for every natural number $n$, then the base case is $n=1$. If we are asked to prove the result holds for every non-negative integer, then the base case is $n=0$.
– André Nicolas
Aug 14 '14 at 1:48










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













Note: First note that you are really summing the geometric series ($a,rinmathbbR, aneq 0, rneq 1$)
$$
a+ar+ar^2+cdots+ar^n=afracr^n+1-1r-1=afrac1-r^n+11-r
$$
with $a=1$. Let's tidy up the question wording just a little bit and then prove your claim.



Claim: Let $a$ and $r$ be real numbers with $aneq 0$ and $rneq 1$. Prove that for each integer $ngeq 1$ that
$$
a+ar+ar^2+cdots+ar^n=afracr^n+1-1r-1.
$$
Proof. Fix $rinmathbbR, rneq 1$, and let $S(n)$ denote the following statement for $ngeq 1$:
$$
S(n) : 1+r+r^2+cdots+r^n=fracr^n+1-1r-1.
$$
In order to solve this problem, it is sufficient for us to prove that $S(n)$ holds for each $ngeq 1$; that is, it suffices to consider only $a=1$. For $r=0$, we can see that $S(n)$ becomes $1=1$. Thus, assume that $rneq 0$ without loss of generality.



Base step ($n=1$): The statement $S(1)$ says that $1+r=fracr^2-1r-1$, which is true since $r^2-1=(r+1)(r-1)$ and $rneq 1$. [Also observe that you could begin the induction at $n=0$ because $S(0)$ simply says $1=fracr-1r-1$.]



Inductive step ($S(k)to S(k+1)$): Fix some $kgeq 1$ and suppose that $S(k)$ is true; that is, assume that
$$
S(k) : 1+r+r^2+cdots+r^k=fracr^k+1-1r-1
$$
is true. We must show that $S(k+1)$ follows where
$$
S(k+1) : 1+r+r^2+cdots+r^k+r^k+1=fracr^k+2-1r-1.
$$
Starting with the left-hand side of $S(k+1)$,
beginalign
textLHS &= colorred1+r+r^2+cdots+r^k+r^k+1tagby definition\[1em]
&= colorredfracr^k+1-1r-1+r^k+1tagby $S(k)$\[1em]
&= fracr^k+1-1r-1+fracr^k+1(r-1)r-1tagcommon denom.\[1em]
&= fracr^k+1-1+r^k+1(r-1)r-1tagcombine like terms\[1em]
&= fracr^k+1-1+r^k+2-r^k+1r-1tagexpand\[1em]
&= fracr^k+2-1r-1,tagsimplify
endalign
we see that the right-hand side of $S(k+1)$ follows. Thus, $S(k)to S(k+1)$, completing the inductive step.



By mathematical induction, for all $ngeq 1, S(n)$ holds true. $blacksquare$




Last note: There are many identities that use this main result. For example, a question was posed not long at all ago to prove that $sum_i=0^n 2^i=2^n+1-1$. One can easily set $r=2$ in what we just proved to see that this result is true.






share|cite|improve this answer





























    up vote
    -1
    down vote













    $$1+r=frac1-r^21-r$$should lead you to check if $$(1+r)(1-r)=1-r^2.$$
    I don't need to tell you more.






    share|cite|improve this answer




















    • Why this downvote ?
      – Yves Daoust
      Mar 23 '15 at 9:11










    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f896832%2fproving-the-geometric-series-sum-i-0n-ri-frac1-rn11-r-by-induc%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Note: First note that you are really summing the geometric series ($a,rinmathbbR, aneq 0, rneq 1$)
    $$
    a+ar+ar^2+cdots+ar^n=afracr^n+1-1r-1=afrac1-r^n+11-r
    $$
    with $a=1$. Let's tidy up the question wording just a little bit and then prove your claim.



    Claim: Let $a$ and $r$ be real numbers with $aneq 0$ and $rneq 1$. Prove that for each integer $ngeq 1$ that
    $$
    a+ar+ar^2+cdots+ar^n=afracr^n+1-1r-1.
    $$
    Proof. Fix $rinmathbbR, rneq 1$, and let $S(n)$ denote the following statement for $ngeq 1$:
    $$
    S(n) : 1+r+r^2+cdots+r^n=fracr^n+1-1r-1.
    $$
    In order to solve this problem, it is sufficient for us to prove that $S(n)$ holds for each $ngeq 1$; that is, it suffices to consider only $a=1$. For $r=0$, we can see that $S(n)$ becomes $1=1$. Thus, assume that $rneq 0$ without loss of generality.



    Base step ($n=1$): The statement $S(1)$ says that $1+r=fracr^2-1r-1$, which is true since $r^2-1=(r+1)(r-1)$ and $rneq 1$. [Also observe that you could begin the induction at $n=0$ because $S(0)$ simply says $1=fracr-1r-1$.]



    Inductive step ($S(k)to S(k+1)$): Fix some $kgeq 1$ and suppose that $S(k)$ is true; that is, assume that
    $$
    S(k) : 1+r+r^2+cdots+r^k=fracr^k+1-1r-1
    $$
    is true. We must show that $S(k+1)$ follows where
    $$
    S(k+1) : 1+r+r^2+cdots+r^k+r^k+1=fracr^k+2-1r-1.
    $$
    Starting with the left-hand side of $S(k+1)$,
    beginalign
    textLHS &= colorred1+r+r^2+cdots+r^k+r^k+1tagby definition\[1em]
    &= colorredfracr^k+1-1r-1+r^k+1tagby $S(k)$\[1em]
    &= fracr^k+1-1r-1+fracr^k+1(r-1)r-1tagcommon denom.\[1em]
    &= fracr^k+1-1+r^k+1(r-1)r-1tagcombine like terms\[1em]
    &= fracr^k+1-1+r^k+2-r^k+1r-1tagexpand\[1em]
    &= fracr^k+2-1r-1,tagsimplify
    endalign
    we see that the right-hand side of $S(k+1)$ follows. Thus, $S(k)to S(k+1)$, completing the inductive step.



    By mathematical induction, for all $ngeq 1, S(n)$ holds true. $blacksquare$




    Last note: There are many identities that use this main result. For example, a question was posed not long at all ago to prove that $sum_i=0^n 2^i=2^n+1-1$. One can easily set $r=2$ in what we just proved to see that this result is true.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Note: First note that you are really summing the geometric series ($a,rinmathbbR, aneq 0, rneq 1$)
      $$
      a+ar+ar^2+cdots+ar^n=afracr^n+1-1r-1=afrac1-r^n+11-r
      $$
      with $a=1$. Let's tidy up the question wording just a little bit and then prove your claim.



      Claim: Let $a$ and $r$ be real numbers with $aneq 0$ and $rneq 1$. Prove that for each integer $ngeq 1$ that
      $$
      a+ar+ar^2+cdots+ar^n=afracr^n+1-1r-1.
      $$
      Proof. Fix $rinmathbbR, rneq 1$, and let $S(n)$ denote the following statement for $ngeq 1$:
      $$
      S(n) : 1+r+r^2+cdots+r^n=fracr^n+1-1r-1.
      $$
      In order to solve this problem, it is sufficient for us to prove that $S(n)$ holds for each $ngeq 1$; that is, it suffices to consider only $a=1$. For $r=0$, we can see that $S(n)$ becomes $1=1$. Thus, assume that $rneq 0$ without loss of generality.



      Base step ($n=1$): The statement $S(1)$ says that $1+r=fracr^2-1r-1$, which is true since $r^2-1=(r+1)(r-1)$ and $rneq 1$. [Also observe that you could begin the induction at $n=0$ because $S(0)$ simply says $1=fracr-1r-1$.]



      Inductive step ($S(k)to S(k+1)$): Fix some $kgeq 1$ and suppose that $S(k)$ is true; that is, assume that
      $$
      S(k) : 1+r+r^2+cdots+r^k=fracr^k+1-1r-1
      $$
      is true. We must show that $S(k+1)$ follows where
      $$
      S(k+1) : 1+r+r^2+cdots+r^k+r^k+1=fracr^k+2-1r-1.
      $$
      Starting with the left-hand side of $S(k+1)$,
      beginalign
      textLHS &= colorred1+r+r^2+cdots+r^k+r^k+1tagby definition\[1em]
      &= colorredfracr^k+1-1r-1+r^k+1tagby $S(k)$\[1em]
      &= fracr^k+1-1r-1+fracr^k+1(r-1)r-1tagcommon denom.\[1em]
      &= fracr^k+1-1+r^k+1(r-1)r-1tagcombine like terms\[1em]
      &= fracr^k+1-1+r^k+2-r^k+1r-1tagexpand\[1em]
      &= fracr^k+2-1r-1,tagsimplify
      endalign
      we see that the right-hand side of $S(k+1)$ follows. Thus, $S(k)to S(k+1)$, completing the inductive step.



      By mathematical induction, for all $ngeq 1, S(n)$ holds true. $blacksquare$




      Last note: There are many identities that use this main result. For example, a question was posed not long at all ago to prove that $sum_i=0^n 2^i=2^n+1-1$. One can easily set $r=2$ in what we just proved to see that this result is true.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        Note: First note that you are really summing the geometric series ($a,rinmathbbR, aneq 0, rneq 1$)
        $$
        a+ar+ar^2+cdots+ar^n=afracr^n+1-1r-1=afrac1-r^n+11-r
        $$
        with $a=1$. Let's tidy up the question wording just a little bit and then prove your claim.



        Claim: Let $a$ and $r$ be real numbers with $aneq 0$ and $rneq 1$. Prove that for each integer $ngeq 1$ that
        $$
        a+ar+ar^2+cdots+ar^n=afracr^n+1-1r-1.
        $$
        Proof. Fix $rinmathbbR, rneq 1$, and let $S(n)$ denote the following statement for $ngeq 1$:
        $$
        S(n) : 1+r+r^2+cdots+r^n=fracr^n+1-1r-1.
        $$
        In order to solve this problem, it is sufficient for us to prove that $S(n)$ holds for each $ngeq 1$; that is, it suffices to consider only $a=1$. For $r=0$, we can see that $S(n)$ becomes $1=1$. Thus, assume that $rneq 0$ without loss of generality.



        Base step ($n=1$): The statement $S(1)$ says that $1+r=fracr^2-1r-1$, which is true since $r^2-1=(r+1)(r-1)$ and $rneq 1$. [Also observe that you could begin the induction at $n=0$ because $S(0)$ simply says $1=fracr-1r-1$.]



        Inductive step ($S(k)to S(k+1)$): Fix some $kgeq 1$ and suppose that $S(k)$ is true; that is, assume that
        $$
        S(k) : 1+r+r^2+cdots+r^k=fracr^k+1-1r-1
        $$
        is true. We must show that $S(k+1)$ follows where
        $$
        S(k+1) : 1+r+r^2+cdots+r^k+r^k+1=fracr^k+2-1r-1.
        $$
        Starting with the left-hand side of $S(k+1)$,
        beginalign
        textLHS &= colorred1+r+r^2+cdots+r^k+r^k+1tagby definition\[1em]
        &= colorredfracr^k+1-1r-1+r^k+1tagby $S(k)$\[1em]
        &= fracr^k+1-1r-1+fracr^k+1(r-1)r-1tagcommon denom.\[1em]
        &= fracr^k+1-1+r^k+1(r-1)r-1tagcombine like terms\[1em]
        &= fracr^k+1-1+r^k+2-r^k+1r-1tagexpand\[1em]
        &= fracr^k+2-1r-1,tagsimplify
        endalign
        we see that the right-hand side of $S(k+1)$ follows. Thus, $S(k)to S(k+1)$, completing the inductive step.



        By mathematical induction, for all $ngeq 1, S(n)$ holds true. $blacksquare$




        Last note: There are many identities that use this main result. For example, a question was posed not long at all ago to prove that $sum_i=0^n 2^i=2^n+1-1$. One can easily set $r=2$ in what we just proved to see that this result is true.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Note: First note that you are really summing the geometric series ($a,rinmathbbR, aneq 0, rneq 1$)
        $$
        a+ar+ar^2+cdots+ar^n=afracr^n+1-1r-1=afrac1-r^n+11-r
        $$
        with $a=1$. Let's tidy up the question wording just a little bit and then prove your claim.



        Claim: Let $a$ and $r$ be real numbers with $aneq 0$ and $rneq 1$. Prove that for each integer $ngeq 1$ that
        $$
        a+ar+ar^2+cdots+ar^n=afracr^n+1-1r-1.
        $$
        Proof. Fix $rinmathbbR, rneq 1$, and let $S(n)$ denote the following statement for $ngeq 1$:
        $$
        S(n) : 1+r+r^2+cdots+r^n=fracr^n+1-1r-1.
        $$
        In order to solve this problem, it is sufficient for us to prove that $S(n)$ holds for each $ngeq 1$; that is, it suffices to consider only $a=1$. For $r=0$, we can see that $S(n)$ becomes $1=1$. Thus, assume that $rneq 0$ without loss of generality.



        Base step ($n=1$): The statement $S(1)$ says that $1+r=fracr^2-1r-1$, which is true since $r^2-1=(r+1)(r-1)$ and $rneq 1$. [Also observe that you could begin the induction at $n=0$ because $S(0)$ simply says $1=fracr-1r-1$.]



        Inductive step ($S(k)to S(k+1)$): Fix some $kgeq 1$ and suppose that $S(k)$ is true; that is, assume that
        $$
        S(k) : 1+r+r^2+cdots+r^k=fracr^k+1-1r-1
        $$
        is true. We must show that $S(k+1)$ follows where
        $$
        S(k+1) : 1+r+r^2+cdots+r^k+r^k+1=fracr^k+2-1r-1.
        $$
        Starting with the left-hand side of $S(k+1)$,
        beginalign
        textLHS &= colorred1+r+r^2+cdots+r^k+r^k+1tagby definition\[1em]
        &= colorredfracr^k+1-1r-1+r^k+1tagby $S(k)$\[1em]
        &= fracr^k+1-1r-1+fracr^k+1(r-1)r-1tagcommon denom.\[1em]
        &= fracr^k+1-1+r^k+1(r-1)r-1tagcombine like terms\[1em]
        &= fracr^k+1-1+r^k+2-r^k+1r-1tagexpand\[1em]
        &= fracr^k+2-1r-1,tagsimplify
        endalign
        we see that the right-hand side of $S(k+1)$ follows. Thus, $S(k)to S(k+1)$, completing the inductive step.



        By mathematical induction, for all $ngeq 1, S(n)$ holds true. $blacksquare$




        Last note: There are many identities that use this main result. For example, a question was posed not long at all ago to prove that $sum_i=0^n 2^i=2^n+1-1$. One can easily set $r=2$ in what we just proved to see that this result is true.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:19









        Community♦

        1




        1










        answered Mar 23 '15 at 9:01









        Daniel W. Farlow

        17.3k114187




        17.3k114187




















            up vote
            -1
            down vote













            $$1+r=frac1-r^21-r$$should lead you to check if $$(1+r)(1-r)=1-r^2.$$
            I don't need to tell you more.






            share|cite|improve this answer




















            • Why this downvote ?
              – Yves Daoust
              Mar 23 '15 at 9:11














            up vote
            -1
            down vote













            $$1+r=frac1-r^21-r$$should lead you to check if $$(1+r)(1-r)=1-r^2.$$
            I don't need to tell you more.






            share|cite|improve this answer




















            • Why this downvote ?
              – Yves Daoust
              Mar 23 '15 at 9:11












            up vote
            -1
            down vote










            up vote
            -1
            down vote









            $$1+r=frac1-r^21-r$$should lead you to check if $$(1+r)(1-r)=1-r^2.$$
            I don't need to tell you more.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            $$1+r=frac1-r^21-r$$should lead you to check if $$(1+r)(1-r)=1-r^2.$$
            I don't need to tell you more.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Mar 23 '15 at 9:10









            Yves Daoust

            114k666209




            114k666209











            • Why this downvote ?
              – Yves Daoust
              Mar 23 '15 at 9:11
















            • Why this downvote ?
              – Yves Daoust
              Mar 23 '15 at 9:11















            Why this downvote ?
            – Yves Daoust
            Mar 23 '15 at 9:11




            Why this downvote ?
            – Yves Daoust
            Mar 23 '15 at 9:11

















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f896832%2fproving-the-geometric-series-sum-i-0n-ri-frac1-rn11-r-by-induc%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

            Solve: $(3xy-2ay^2)dx+(x^2-2axy)dy=0$