Let $f:Bbb R toBbb R^3$ be a differentiable map with $Vert f(x)Vert=1$ for any $x inBbb R$. Prove that $f'(x)cdot f(x)=0.$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












Informally I think what I am trying to prove is that at any point on the shell of the sphere of radius 1 centered at (0,0,0) in R3 has a derivative normal to that point's vector.



This is what I have so far:



$sqrt f_1(x)^2+f_2(x)^2+f_3(x)^2=1 iff f_1(x)^2+f_2(x)^2+f_3(x)^2=1$



This is the step that confuses me; am I allowed to just state this?



$Rightarrow fracddx(f_1(x)^2+f_2(x)^2+f_3(x)^2)=0 iff fracddxf_1(x)^2+fracddxf_2(x)^2+fracddxf_3(x)^2=0$.



This step is also one I am not sure if I'm allowed to do



$iff 2(f_1(x)fracdf_1dx(x)+f_2(x)fracdf_2dx(x)+f_3(x)fracdf_3dx(x))=0 iff f_1(x)fracdf_1dx(x)+f_2(x)fracdf_2dx(x)+f_3(x)fracdf_3dx(x)=0=f(x)cdotfracdfdx(x)Box$










share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Informally I think what I am trying to prove is that at any point on the shell of the sphere of radius 1 centered at (0,0,0) in R3 has a derivative normal to that point's vector.



    This is what I have so far:



    $sqrt f_1(x)^2+f_2(x)^2+f_3(x)^2=1 iff f_1(x)^2+f_2(x)^2+f_3(x)^2=1$



    This is the step that confuses me; am I allowed to just state this?



    $Rightarrow fracddx(f_1(x)^2+f_2(x)^2+f_3(x)^2)=0 iff fracddxf_1(x)^2+fracddxf_2(x)^2+fracddxf_3(x)^2=0$.



    This step is also one I am not sure if I'm allowed to do



    $iff 2(f_1(x)fracdf_1dx(x)+f_2(x)fracdf_2dx(x)+f_3(x)fracdf_3dx(x))=0 iff f_1(x)fracdf_1dx(x)+f_2(x)fracdf_2dx(x)+f_3(x)fracdf_3dx(x)=0=f(x)cdotfracdfdx(x)Box$










    share|cite|improve this question

























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Informally I think what I am trying to prove is that at any point on the shell of the sphere of radius 1 centered at (0,0,0) in R3 has a derivative normal to that point's vector.



      This is what I have so far:



      $sqrt f_1(x)^2+f_2(x)^2+f_3(x)^2=1 iff f_1(x)^2+f_2(x)^2+f_3(x)^2=1$



      This is the step that confuses me; am I allowed to just state this?



      $Rightarrow fracddx(f_1(x)^2+f_2(x)^2+f_3(x)^2)=0 iff fracddxf_1(x)^2+fracddxf_2(x)^2+fracddxf_3(x)^2=0$.



      This step is also one I am not sure if I'm allowed to do



      $iff 2(f_1(x)fracdf_1dx(x)+f_2(x)fracdf_2dx(x)+f_3(x)fracdf_3dx(x))=0 iff f_1(x)fracdf_1dx(x)+f_2(x)fracdf_2dx(x)+f_3(x)fracdf_3dx(x)=0=f(x)cdotfracdfdx(x)Box$










      share|cite|improve this question















      Informally I think what I am trying to prove is that at any point on the shell of the sphere of radius 1 centered at (0,0,0) in R3 has a derivative normal to that point's vector.



      This is what I have so far:



      $sqrt f_1(x)^2+f_2(x)^2+f_3(x)^2=1 iff f_1(x)^2+f_2(x)^2+f_3(x)^2=1$



      This is the step that confuses me; am I allowed to just state this?



      $Rightarrow fracddx(f_1(x)^2+f_2(x)^2+f_3(x)^2)=0 iff fracddxf_1(x)^2+fracddxf_2(x)^2+fracddxf_3(x)^2=0$.



      This step is also one I am not sure if I'm allowed to do



      $iff 2(f_1(x)fracdf_1dx(x)+f_2(x)fracdf_2dx(x)+f_3(x)fracdf_3dx(x))=0 iff f_1(x)fracdf_1dx(x)+f_2(x)fracdf_2dx(x)+f_3(x)fracdf_3dx(x)=0=f(x)cdotfracdfdx(x)Box$







      real-analysis vectors epsilon-delta orthogonality






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Sep 2 at 6:04

























      asked Sep 2 at 5:38









      Big_Tubbz

      213




      213




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          Just take the equality $f_1(x)^2+f_2(x)^2+f_3(x)^2=1$ and differentiate both sides with respect to $x$. What do you get?



          The two steps you are confused about are linearity of differentiation: $fracddx(f(x)+g(x))=fracddx f(x)+fracddx g(x)$ and $fracddx(af(x))=afracddxf(x)$ for functions $f$ and $g$ and a real number $a$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            The fact $lVert f(x)rVert=1$ implies $$lVert f(x)rVert^2=langle f(x),f(x)rangle=1$$
            Now take the derivative of both sides with respect to $x$ to get
            $$2langle f(x),f'(x)rangle=0$$
            The meaning of that is, that the position vector is perpendicular to the velocity vector.



            Edit:
            The second part is easy to obtain
            $$fracddxlangle f(x),f(x)rangle=langle f'(x),f(x)rangle+langle f(x),f'(x)rangle=2langle f'(x),f(x)rangle=2langle f(x),f'(x)rangle$$
            by product rule and symmetry.






            share|cite|improve this answer





























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Since



              $(f_1(x))^2 + (f_2(x))^2 + (f_3(x))^2 =1, tag 1$



              differentiating we have



              $2f_1(x) f_1'(x) + 2f_2(x) f_2'(x) +2f_3(x) f_3'(x) = 0; tag 2$



              we divide by $2$ and obtain



              $f(x) cdot f'(x) = f_1(x) f_1'(x) + f_2(x) f_2'(x) +f_3(x) f_3'(x) = 0.
              tag 3$



              Your demonstration agrees with mine, hence it must be correct! 😉






              share|cite|improve this answer




















                Your Answer




                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                );
                );
                , "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function()
                var channelOptions =
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                ;
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                createEditor();
                );

                else
                createEditor();

                );

                function createEditor()
                StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: false,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                );



                );













                 

                draft saved


                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function ()
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2902376%2flet-f-bbb-r-to-bbb-r3-be-a-differentiable-map-with-vert-fx-vert-1-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                );

                Post as a guest






























                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes








                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes








                up vote
                2
                down vote













                Just take the equality $f_1(x)^2+f_2(x)^2+f_3(x)^2=1$ and differentiate both sides with respect to $x$. What do you get?



                The two steps you are confused about are linearity of differentiation: $fracddx(f(x)+g(x))=fracddx f(x)+fracddx g(x)$ and $fracddx(af(x))=afracddxf(x)$ for functions $f$ and $g$ and a real number $a$.






                share|cite|improve this answer


























                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote













                  Just take the equality $f_1(x)^2+f_2(x)^2+f_3(x)^2=1$ and differentiate both sides with respect to $x$. What do you get?



                  The two steps you are confused about are linearity of differentiation: $fracddx(f(x)+g(x))=fracddx f(x)+fracddx g(x)$ and $fracddx(af(x))=afracddxf(x)$ for functions $f$ and $g$ and a real number $a$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer
























                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote









                    Just take the equality $f_1(x)^2+f_2(x)^2+f_3(x)^2=1$ and differentiate both sides with respect to $x$. What do you get?



                    The two steps you are confused about are linearity of differentiation: $fracddx(f(x)+g(x))=fracddx f(x)+fracddx g(x)$ and $fracddx(af(x))=afracddxf(x)$ for functions $f$ and $g$ and a real number $a$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    Just take the equality $f_1(x)^2+f_2(x)^2+f_3(x)^2=1$ and differentiate both sides with respect to $x$. What do you get?



                    The two steps you are confused about are linearity of differentiation: $fracddx(f(x)+g(x))=fracddx f(x)+fracddx g(x)$ and $fracddx(af(x))=afracddxf(x)$ for functions $f$ and $g$ and a real number $a$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Sep 2 at 6:07

























                    answered Sep 2 at 5:46









                    Kusma

                    3,355218




                    3,355218




















                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        The fact $lVert f(x)rVert=1$ implies $$lVert f(x)rVert^2=langle f(x),f(x)rangle=1$$
                        Now take the derivative of both sides with respect to $x$ to get
                        $$2langle f(x),f'(x)rangle=0$$
                        The meaning of that is, that the position vector is perpendicular to the velocity vector.



                        Edit:
                        The second part is easy to obtain
                        $$fracddxlangle f(x),f(x)rangle=langle f'(x),f(x)rangle+langle f(x),f'(x)rangle=2langle f'(x),f(x)rangle=2langle f(x),f'(x)rangle$$
                        by product rule and symmetry.






                        share|cite|improve this answer


























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          The fact $lVert f(x)rVert=1$ implies $$lVert f(x)rVert^2=langle f(x),f(x)rangle=1$$
                          Now take the derivative of both sides with respect to $x$ to get
                          $$2langle f(x),f'(x)rangle=0$$
                          The meaning of that is, that the position vector is perpendicular to the velocity vector.



                          Edit:
                          The second part is easy to obtain
                          $$fracddxlangle f(x),f(x)rangle=langle f'(x),f(x)rangle+langle f(x),f'(x)rangle=2langle f'(x),f(x)rangle=2langle f(x),f'(x)rangle$$
                          by product rule and symmetry.






                          share|cite|improve this answer
























                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote









                            The fact $lVert f(x)rVert=1$ implies $$lVert f(x)rVert^2=langle f(x),f(x)rangle=1$$
                            Now take the derivative of both sides with respect to $x$ to get
                            $$2langle f(x),f'(x)rangle=0$$
                            The meaning of that is, that the position vector is perpendicular to the velocity vector.



                            Edit:
                            The second part is easy to obtain
                            $$fracddxlangle f(x),f(x)rangle=langle f'(x),f(x)rangle+langle f(x),f'(x)rangle=2langle f'(x),f(x)rangle=2langle f(x),f'(x)rangle$$
                            by product rule and symmetry.






                            share|cite|improve this answer














                            The fact $lVert f(x)rVert=1$ implies $$lVert f(x)rVert^2=langle f(x),f(x)rangle=1$$
                            Now take the derivative of both sides with respect to $x$ to get
                            $$2langle f(x),f'(x)rangle=0$$
                            The meaning of that is, that the position vector is perpendicular to the velocity vector.



                            Edit:
                            The second part is easy to obtain
                            $$fracddxlangle f(x),f(x)rangle=langle f'(x),f(x)rangle+langle f(x),f'(x)rangle=2langle f'(x),f(x)rangle=2langle f(x),f'(x)rangle$$
                            by product rule and symmetry.







                            share|cite|improve this answer














                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            edited Sep 3 at 15:37

























                            answered Sep 2 at 8:39









                            Fakemistake

                            1,568714




                            1,568714




















                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote













                                Since



                                $(f_1(x))^2 + (f_2(x))^2 + (f_3(x))^2 =1, tag 1$



                                differentiating we have



                                $2f_1(x) f_1'(x) + 2f_2(x) f_2'(x) +2f_3(x) f_3'(x) = 0; tag 2$



                                we divide by $2$ and obtain



                                $f(x) cdot f'(x) = f_1(x) f_1'(x) + f_2(x) f_2'(x) +f_3(x) f_3'(x) = 0.
                                tag 3$



                                Your demonstration agrees with mine, hence it must be correct! 😉






                                share|cite|improve this answer
























                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote













                                  Since



                                  $(f_1(x))^2 + (f_2(x))^2 + (f_3(x))^2 =1, tag 1$



                                  differentiating we have



                                  $2f_1(x) f_1'(x) + 2f_2(x) f_2'(x) +2f_3(x) f_3'(x) = 0; tag 2$



                                  we divide by $2$ and obtain



                                  $f(x) cdot f'(x) = f_1(x) f_1'(x) + f_2(x) f_2'(x) +f_3(x) f_3'(x) = 0.
                                  tag 3$



                                  Your demonstration agrees with mine, hence it must be correct! 😉






                                  share|cite|improve this answer






















                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote










                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote









                                    Since



                                    $(f_1(x))^2 + (f_2(x))^2 + (f_3(x))^2 =1, tag 1$



                                    differentiating we have



                                    $2f_1(x) f_1'(x) + 2f_2(x) f_2'(x) +2f_3(x) f_3'(x) = 0; tag 2$



                                    we divide by $2$ and obtain



                                    $f(x) cdot f'(x) = f_1(x) f_1'(x) + f_2(x) f_2'(x) +f_3(x) f_3'(x) = 0.
                                    tag 3$



                                    Your demonstration agrees with mine, hence it must be correct! 😉






                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    Since



                                    $(f_1(x))^2 + (f_2(x))^2 + (f_3(x))^2 =1, tag 1$



                                    differentiating we have



                                    $2f_1(x) f_1'(x) + 2f_2(x) f_2'(x) +2f_3(x) f_3'(x) = 0; tag 2$



                                    we divide by $2$ and obtain



                                    $f(x) cdot f'(x) = f_1(x) f_1'(x) + f_2(x) f_2'(x) +f_3(x) f_3'(x) = 0.
                                    tag 3$



                                    Your demonstration agrees with mine, hence it must be correct! 😉







                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    answered Sep 2 at 6:03









                                    Robert Lewis

                                    38.5k22357




                                    38.5k22357



























                                         

                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded















































                                         


                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function ()
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2902376%2flet-f-bbb-r-to-bbb-r3-be-a-differentiable-map-with-vert-fx-vert-1-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                        );

                                        Post as a guest













































































                                        這個網誌中的熱門文章

                                        tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

                                        How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                                        1st Magritte Awards