Proof related to number of conjugates of an element of a group

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Theorem



Let G be a finite group and let a be an element of G . Then,$ |cl(a)|=|G:C(a)|.$



Attempt



Consider the function$T$ that sends the coset $xC(a)$ to the conjugate $xax^-1$.



$xC(a)=yC(a)$ which implies $y^
-1x in C(a)$
which inturn implies $y^-1xa=ay^-1x$.Rearranging we get $xax^-1=yay^-1$. So T is well defined.
By reversing the argument ,we can see T is one-one. Clearly T is onto.



Doubt



Is my proof correct?



How to prove T preserves operation? Or does it preserves operation. (It is not required for the proof)










share|cite|improve this question





















  • Why do you need $T$ to preserve an operation? All you need is that it's a bijection in order to conclude that the cardinalities of the two sets are equal.
    – Bungo
    Sep 2 at 6:02










  • My bad. I have edited the question.
    – blue boy
    Sep 2 at 6:03






  • 3




    Your proof is fine as written. Note that in general, $cl(a)$ and $G / C(a)$ aren't even groups, so it wouldn't make a lot of sense to ask whether $T$ preserves the group operation.
    – Bungo
    Sep 2 at 6:05










  • If $C(a)$ is replaced by center $Z(G)$ then the operation will be preserved right?
    – blue boy
    Sep 2 at 6:25











  • $T:gZ(G) to phi_g $where$ phi_g= gxg^-1$
    – blue boy
    Sep 2 at 7:03














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Theorem



Let G be a finite group and let a be an element of G . Then,$ |cl(a)|=|G:C(a)|.$



Attempt



Consider the function$T$ that sends the coset $xC(a)$ to the conjugate $xax^-1$.



$xC(a)=yC(a)$ which implies $y^
-1x in C(a)$
which inturn implies $y^-1xa=ay^-1x$.Rearranging we get $xax^-1=yay^-1$. So T is well defined.
By reversing the argument ,we can see T is one-one. Clearly T is onto.



Doubt



Is my proof correct?



How to prove T preserves operation? Or does it preserves operation. (It is not required for the proof)










share|cite|improve this question





















  • Why do you need $T$ to preserve an operation? All you need is that it's a bijection in order to conclude that the cardinalities of the two sets are equal.
    – Bungo
    Sep 2 at 6:02










  • My bad. I have edited the question.
    – blue boy
    Sep 2 at 6:03






  • 3




    Your proof is fine as written. Note that in general, $cl(a)$ and $G / C(a)$ aren't even groups, so it wouldn't make a lot of sense to ask whether $T$ preserves the group operation.
    – Bungo
    Sep 2 at 6:05










  • If $C(a)$ is replaced by center $Z(G)$ then the operation will be preserved right?
    – blue boy
    Sep 2 at 6:25











  • $T:gZ(G) to phi_g $where$ phi_g= gxg^-1$
    – blue boy
    Sep 2 at 7:03












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Theorem



Let G be a finite group and let a be an element of G . Then,$ |cl(a)|=|G:C(a)|.$



Attempt



Consider the function$T$ that sends the coset $xC(a)$ to the conjugate $xax^-1$.



$xC(a)=yC(a)$ which implies $y^
-1x in C(a)$
which inturn implies $y^-1xa=ay^-1x$.Rearranging we get $xax^-1=yay^-1$. So T is well defined.
By reversing the argument ,we can see T is one-one. Clearly T is onto.



Doubt



Is my proof correct?



How to prove T preserves operation? Or does it preserves operation. (It is not required for the proof)










share|cite|improve this question













Theorem



Let G be a finite group and let a be an element of G . Then,$ |cl(a)|=|G:C(a)|.$



Attempt



Consider the function$T$ that sends the coset $xC(a)$ to the conjugate $xax^-1$.



$xC(a)=yC(a)$ which implies $y^
-1x in C(a)$
which inturn implies $y^-1xa=ay^-1x$.Rearranging we get $xax^-1=yay^-1$. So T is well defined.
By reversing the argument ,we can see T is one-one. Clearly T is onto.



Doubt



Is my proof correct?



How to prove T preserves operation? Or does it preserves operation. (It is not required for the proof)







abstract-algebra group-theory proof-verification






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Sep 2 at 5:58









blue boy

1,117513




1,117513











  • Why do you need $T$ to preserve an operation? All you need is that it's a bijection in order to conclude that the cardinalities of the two sets are equal.
    – Bungo
    Sep 2 at 6:02










  • My bad. I have edited the question.
    – blue boy
    Sep 2 at 6:03






  • 3




    Your proof is fine as written. Note that in general, $cl(a)$ and $G / C(a)$ aren't even groups, so it wouldn't make a lot of sense to ask whether $T$ preserves the group operation.
    – Bungo
    Sep 2 at 6:05










  • If $C(a)$ is replaced by center $Z(G)$ then the operation will be preserved right?
    – blue boy
    Sep 2 at 6:25











  • $T:gZ(G) to phi_g $where$ phi_g= gxg^-1$
    – blue boy
    Sep 2 at 7:03
















  • Why do you need $T$ to preserve an operation? All you need is that it's a bijection in order to conclude that the cardinalities of the two sets are equal.
    – Bungo
    Sep 2 at 6:02










  • My bad. I have edited the question.
    – blue boy
    Sep 2 at 6:03






  • 3




    Your proof is fine as written. Note that in general, $cl(a)$ and $G / C(a)$ aren't even groups, so it wouldn't make a lot of sense to ask whether $T$ preserves the group operation.
    – Bungo
    Sep 2 at 6:05










  • If $C(a)$ is replaced by center $Z(G)$ then the operation will be preserved right?
    – blue boy
    Sep 2 at 6:25











  • $T:gZ(G) to phi_g $where$ phi_g= gxg^-1$
    – blue boy
    Sep 2 at 7:03















Why do you need $T$ to preserve an operation? All you need is that it's a bijection in order to conclude that the cardinalities of the two sets are equal.
– Bungo
Sep 2 at 6:02




Why do you need $T$ to preserve an operation? All you need is that it's a bijection in order to conclude that the cardinalities of the two sets are equal.
– Bungo
Sep 2 at 6:02












My bad. I have edited the question.
– blue boy
Sep 2 at 6:03




My bad. I have edited the question.
– blue boy
Sep 2 at 6:03




3




3




Your proof is fine as written. Note that in general, $cl(a)$ and $G / C(a)$ aren't even groups, so it wouldn't make a lot of sense to ask whether $T$ preserves the group operation.
– Bungo
Sep 2 at 6:05




Your proof is fine as written. Note that in general, $cl(a)$ and $G / C(a)$ aren't even groups, so it wouldn't make a lot of sense to ask whether $T$ preserves the group operation.
– Bungo
Sep 2 at 6:05












If $C(a)$ is replaced by center $Z(G)$ then the operation will be preserved right?
– blue boy
Sep 2 at 6:25





If $C(a)$ is replaced by center $Z(G)$ then the operation will be preserved right?
– blue boy
Sep 2 at 6:25













$T:gZ(G) to phi_g $where$ phi_g= gxg^-1$
– blue boy
Sep 2 at 7:03




$T:gZ(G) to phi_g $where$ phi_g= gxg^-1$
– blue boy
Sep 2 at 7:03















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2902387%2fproof-related-to-number-of-conjugates-of-an-element-of-a-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2902387%2fproof-related-to-number-of-conjugates-of-an-element-of-a-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

1st Magritte Awards