Verify of sub-additivity conditions

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Picture below is from Lions, Pierre-Louis, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations. The locally compact case. I, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire 1, 109-145 (1984). ZBL0541.49009.



The author want to verify the sub-additivity conditions. But I fail to understand it.



First, about the second red line, why distance between the supports of $u_varepsilon,v_varepsilon^n$ go to $+infty$ means the two expression go to zero?



Second, about the third red line, I think there should be a typing error, I think it should be
$$
I_lambdale I_alpha+ I^infty_lambda-alpha+ 2varepsilon
$$
But, I still can't get it. How should I understand it?



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




enter image description here



enter image description here



enter image description here



enter image description here











share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Picture below is from Lions, Pierre-Louis, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations. The locally compact case. I, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire 1, 109-145 (1984). ZBL0541.49009.



    The author want to verify the sub-additivity conditions. But I fail to understand it.



    First, about the second red line, why distance between the supports of $u_varepsilon,v_varepsilon^n$ go to $+infty$ means the two expression go to zero?



    Second, about the third red line, I think there should be a typing error, I think it should be
    $$
    I_lambdale I_alpha+ I^infty_lambda-alpha+ 2varepsilon
    $$
    But, I still can't get it. How should I understand it?



    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




    enter image description here



    enter image description here



    enter image description here



    enter image description here











    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Picture below is from Lions, Pierre-Louis, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations. The locally compact case. I, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire 1, 109-145 (1984). ZBL0541.49009.



      The author want to verify the sub-additivity conditions. But I fail to understand it.



      First, about the second red line, why distance between the supports of $u_varepsilon,v_varepsilon^n$ go to $+infty$ means the two expression go to zero?



      Second, about the third red line, I think there should be a typing error, I think it should be
      $$
      I_lambdale I_alpha+ I^infty_lambda-alpha+ 2varepsilon
      $$
      But, I still can't get it. How should I understand it?



      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




      enter image description here



      enter image description here



      enter image description here



      enter image description here











      share|cite|improve this question













      Picture below is from Lions, Pierre-Louis, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations. The locally compact case. I, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire 1, 109-145 (1984). ZBL0541.49009.



      The author want to verify the sub-additivity conditions. But I fail to understand it.



      First, about the second red line, why distance between the supports of $u_varepsilon,v_varepsilon^n$ go to $+infty$ means the two expression go to zero?



      Second, about the third red line, I think there should be a typing error, I think it should be
      $$
      I_lambdale I_alpha+ I^infty_lambda-alpha+ 2varepsilon
      $$
      But, I still can't get it. How should I understand it?



      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




      enter image description here



      enter image description here



      enter image description here



      enter image description here








      pde






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Sep 7 at 1:42









      lanse7pty

      1,7861723




      1,7861723

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2908184%2fverify-of-sub-additivity-conditions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2908184%2fverify-of-sub-additivity-conditions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          1st Magritte Awards