Constructing a smooth bump function on a manifold

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












In "Loring W. Tu, An introduction to manifolds" the following question exists: Let $q$ be a point of an $n$-dimensional manifold $M$ and $U$ any neighborhood of $q$. Construct a smooth bump function at $q$ supported in $U$. I answered that question but I want to make sure. Here is my answer:



Let $q$ be arbitrary of $M$ that is contained in a neighborhood $Usubset M$. Then, there exists a coordinate chart $(V,phi)$ in the maximal atlas of $M$ such that $qin V subset U$. In particular, there exists a smooth bump function $rho:mathbbR^n to mathbbR$ at $phi(q)$ supported in $phi(V)$ that is identically $1$ in a neighborhood $B_r(phi(q)) subset phi(V)$, say, of $phi(q)$. Define a map $f:Mto mathbbR$ by
$$
f(p) =
begincases
rhobigl(phi(p) bigr), &text$pin V$, \
0, &text$pnotin V$.
endcases
$$
Being the composite of two smooth function, $f$ is smooth on $V$ and hence on the whole manifold $M$. If $pin phi^-1bigl( B_r(phi(q)) bigr)$, then $phi(p) in B_rbigl( phi(q) bigr)$ and therefore, by the construction of $rho$, $rhobigl( phi(p) bigr)=1$. That is, $f equiv 1$ on the neighborhood $phi^-1bigl( B_r(phi(q)) bigr)$ of $q$. Clearly, by the definition of $f$, $supp, f subset V subset U$. Hence, $f$ is a smooth bump function at $q$ supported in $U$.



Can anyone please revise my proof ?. I appreciate your help.
Thanks in advance.



Note: A smooth bump function $f:Mto mathbbR$ at a point $qin M$ supported in $Usubset M$ is a non-negative smooth function such that $fequiv 1$ on a neighborhood $V_q subset U$ of $q$ and that $supp, f subset U$.










share|cite|improve this question























  • Is $phi^-1(B_r(phi(q)))$ relatively compact?
    – Michael Lee
    Jul 6 '17 at 5:53










  • What is meant by the term "relatively compact" ? @MichaelLee
    – Hussein Eid
    Jul 6 '17 at 5:55










  • "Relatively compact" = "precompact" = "has compact closure"
    – Michael Lee
    Jul 6 '17 at 5:56






  • 1




    Smoothness on $V$ and smoothness on $V^c$ are together not equivalent to smoothness on $M$. You also need smoothness at the boundary.
    – Michael Lee
    Jul 6 '17 at 6:53







  • 1




    Also, here's a graph of $f$: imgur.com/a/tAfsN. I promise you, it's continuous.
    – Michael Lee
    Jul 6 '17 at 7:18















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












In "Loring W. Tu, An introduction to manifolds" the following question exists: Let $q$ be a point of an $n$-dimensional manifold $M$ and $U$ any neighborhood of $q$. Construct a smooth bump function at $q$ supported in $U$. I answered that question but I want to make sure. Here is my answer:



Let $q$ be arbitrary of $M$ that is contained in a neighborhood $Usubset M$. Then, there exists a coordinate chart $(V,phi)$ in the maximal atlas of $M$ such that $qin V subset U$. In particular, there exists a smooth bump function $rho:mathbbR^n to mathbbR$ at $phi(q)$ supported in $phi(V)$ that is identically $1$ in a neighborhood $B_r(phi(q)) subset phi(V)$, say, of $phi(q)$. Define a map $f:Mto mathbbR$ by
$$
f(p) =
begincases
rhobigl(phi(p) bigr), &text$pin V$, \
0, &text$pnotin V$.
endcases
$$
Being the composite of two smooth function, $f$ is smooth on $V$ and hence on the whole manifold $M$. If $pin phi^-1bigl( B_r(phi(q)) bigr)$, then $phi(p) in B_rbigl( phi(q) bigr)$ and therefore, by the construction of $rho$, $rhobigl( phi(p) bigr)=1$. That is, $f equiv 1$ on the neighborhood $phi^-1bigl( B_r(phi(q)) bigr)$ of $q$. Clearly, by the definition of $f$, $supp, f subset V subset U$. Hence, $f$ is a smooth bump function at $q$ supported in $U$.



Can anyone please revise my proof ?. I appreciate your help.
Thanks in advance.



Note: A smooth bump function $f:Mto mathbbR$ at a point $qin M$ supported in $Usubset M$ is a non-negative smooth function such that $fequiv 1$ on a neighborhood $V_q subset U$ of $q$ and that $supp, f subset U$.










share|cite|improve this question























  • Is $phi^-1(B_r(phi(q)))$ relatively compact?
    – Michael Lee
    Jul 6 '17 at 5:53










  • What is meant by the term "relatively compact" ? @MichaelLee
    – Hussein Eid
    Jul 6 '17 at 5:55










  • "Relatively compact" = "precompact" = "has compact closure"
    – Michael Lee
    Jul 6 '17 at 5:56






  • 1




    Smoothness on $V$ and smoothness on $V^c$ are together not equivalent to smoothness on $M$. You also need smoothness at the boundary.
    – Michael Lee
    Jul 6 '17 at 6:53







  • 1




    Also, here's a graph of $f$: imgur.com/a/tAfsN. I promise you, it's continuous.
    – Michael Lee
    Jul 6 '17 at 7:18













up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





In "Loring W. Tu, An introduction to manifolds" the following question exists: Let $q$ be a point of an $n$-dimensional manifold $M$ and $U$ any neighborhood of $q$. Construct a smooth bump function at $q$ supported in $U$. I answered that question but I want to make sure. Here is my answer:



Let $q$ be arbitrary of $M$ that is contained in a neighborhood $Usubset M$. Then, there exists a coordinate chart $(V,phi)$ in the maximal atlas of $M$ such that $qin V subset U$. In particular, there exists a smooth bump function $rho:mathbbR^n to mathbbR$ at $phi(q)$ supported in $phi(V)$ that is identically $1$ in a neighborhood $B_r(phi(q)) subset phi(V)$, say, of $phi(q)$. Define a map $f:Mto mathbbR$ by
$$
f(p) =
begincases
rhobigl(phi(p) bigr), &text$pin V$, \
0, &text$pnotin V$.
endcases
$$
Being the composite of two smooth function, $f$ is smooth on $V$ and hence on the whole manifold $M$. If $pin phi^-1bigl( B_r(phi(q)) bigr)$, then $phi(p) in B_rbigl( phi(q) bigr)$ and therefore, by the construction of $rho$, $rhobigl( phi(p) bigr)=1$. That is, $f equiv 1$ on the neighborhood $phi^-1bigl( B_r(phi(q)) bigr)$ of $q$. Clearly, by the definition of $f$, $supp, f subset V subset U$. Hence, $f$ is a smooth bump function at $q$ supported in $U$.



Can anyone please revise my proof ?. I appreciate your help.
Thanks in advance.



Note: A smooth bump function $f:Mto mathbbR$ at a point $qin M$ supported in $Usubset M$ is a non-negative smooth function such that $fequiv 1$ on a neighborhood $V_q subset U$ of $q$ and that $supp, f subset U$.










share|cite|improve this question















In "Loring W. Tu, An introduction to manifolds" the following question exists: Let $q$ be a point of an $n$-dimensional manifold $M$ and $U$ any neighborhood of $q$. Construct a smooth bump function at $q$ supported in $U$. I answered that question but I want to make sure. Here is my answer:



Let $q$ be arbitrary of $M$ that is contained in a neighborhood $Usubset M$. Then, there exists a coordinate chart $(V,phi)$ in the maximal atlas of $M$ such that $qin V subset U$. In particular, there exists a smooth bump function $rho:mathbbR^n to mathbbR$ at $phi(q)$ supported in $phi(V)$ that is identically $1$ in a neighborhood $B_r(phi(q)) subset phi(V)$, say, of $phi(q)$. Define a map $f:Mto mathbbR$ by
$$
f(p) =
begincases
rhobigl(phi(p) bigr), &text$pin V$, \
0, &text$pnotin V$.
endcases
$$
Being the composite of two smooth function, $f$ is smooth on $V$ and hence on the whole manifold $M$. If $pin phi^-1bigl( B_r(phi(q)) bigr)$, then $phi(p) in B_rbigl( phi(q) bigr)$ and therefore, by the construction of $rho$, $rhobigl( phi(p) bigr)=1$. That is, $f equiv 1$ on the neighborhood $phi^-1bigl( B_r(phi(q)) bigr)$ of $q$. Clearly, by the definition of $f$, $supp, f subset V subset U$. Hence, $f$ is a smooth bump function at $q$ supported in $U$.



Can anyone please revise my proof ?. I appreciate your help.
Thanks in advance.



Note: A smooth bump function $f:Mto mathbbR$ at a point $qin M$ supported in $Usubset M$ is a non-negative smooth function such that $fequiv 1$ on a neighborhood $V_q subset U$ of $q$ and that $supp, f subset U$.







differential-geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 6 '17 at 6:12

























asked Jul 6 '17 at 5:43









Hussein Eid

24216




24216











  • Is $phi^-1(B_r(phi(q)))$ relatively compact?
    – Michael Lee
    Jul 6 '17 at 5:53










  • What is meant by the term "relatively compact" ? @MichaelLee
    – Hussein Eid
    Jul 6 '17 at 5:55










  • "Relatively compact" = "precompact" = "has compact closure"
    – Michael Lee
    Jul 6 '17 at 5:56






  • 1




    Smoothness on $V$ and smoothness on $V^c$ are together not equivalent to smoothness on $M$. You also need smoothness at the boundary.
    – Michael Lee
    Jul 6 '17 at 6:53







  • 1




    Also, here's a graph of $f$: imgur.com/a/tAfsN. I promise you, it's continuous.
    – Michael Lee
    Jul 6 '17 at 7:18

















  • Is $phi^-1(B_r(phi(q)))$ relatively compact?
    – Michael Lee
    Jul 6 '17 at 5:53










  • What is meant by the term "relatively compact" ? @MichaelLee
    – Hussein Eid
    Jul 6 '17 at 5:55










  • "Relatively compact" = "precompact" = "has compact closure"
    – Michael Lee
    Jul 6 '17 at 5:56






  • 1




    Smoothness on $V$ and smoothness on $V^c$ are together not equivalent to smoothness on $M$. You also need smoothness at the boundary.
    – Michael Lee
    Jul 6 '17 at 6:53







  • 1




    Also, here's a graph of $f$: imgur.com/a/tAfsN. I promise you, it's continuous.
    – Michael Lee
    Jul 6 '17 at 7:18
















Is $phi^-1(B_r(phi(q)))$ relatively compact?
– Michael Lee
Jul 6 '17 at 5:53




Is $phi^-1(B_r(phi(q)))$ relatively compact?
– Michael Lee
Jul 6 '17 at 5:53












What is meant by the term "relatively compact" ? @MichaelLee
– Hussein Eid
Jul 6 '17 at 5:55




What is meant by the term "relatively compact" ? @MichaelLee
– Hussein Eid
Jul 6 '17 at 5:55












"Relatively compact" = "precompact" = "has compact closure"
– Michael Lee
Jul 6 '17 at 5:56




"Relatively compact" = "precompact" = "has compact closure"
– Michael Lee
Jul 6 '17 at 5:56




1




1




Smoothness on $V$ and smoothness on $V^c$ are together not equivalent to smoothness on $M$. You also need smoothness at the boundary.
– Michael Lee
Jul 6 '17 at 6:53





Smoothness on $V$ and smoothness on $V^c$ are together not equivalent to smoothness on $M$. You also need smoothness at the boundary.
– Michael Lee
Jul 6 '17 at 6:53





1




1




Also, here's a graph of $f$: imgur.com/a/tAfsN. I promise you, it's continuous.
– Michael Lee
Jul 6 '17 at 7:18





Also, here's a graph of $f$: imgur.com/a/tAfsN. I promise you, it's continuous.
– Michael Lee
Jul 6 '17 at 7:18











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













As pointed out in the comments, the map $f$ that you constructed may not be $C^infty$. But you are almost there.



Notice that in Tu's book the bump function $phi:mathbbR^nrightarrow mathbb R$ could be chosen so that its support $mathrmsuppphi$ is a compact subspace of $mathbbR^n$. Then $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$, being the image of a compact subspace under the continuous map $phi^-1:phi(V)rightarrow V$, is a compact subspace of $V$. Hence $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$ is a compact subspace of $M$. But $M$ is Hausdorff, so this means that $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$ is closed in $M$. Therefore, we have that $$mathrmsuppf=mathrmcl_M((rhocircphi)^-1(mathbbR^times))=mathrmcl_M(phi^-1(rho^-1(mathbbR^times))subsetmathrmcl_M(phi^-1(mathrmsupprho))=phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)subset V.$$
From this follows that $f$ is smooth: If $pnotin V$, choose a chart about $p$ disjoint from $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$. (This is possible because $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$ is closed in $M$.) Then this chart is also disjoint from $mathrmsuppf$, so on this chart $f$ is identically $0$. Hence $f$ is $C^infty$
at $p$. This proves that $f$ is $C^infty$ at every point not in $V$. By construction, $f$ is also $C^infty$ at every point in $V$. Hence $f$ is $C^infty$.



Finally you check that $f$ satisfies all the properties required as a bump function at $q$ supported in $U$. This should not be difficult.






share|cite|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2348031%2fconstructing-a-smooth-bump-function-on-a-manifold%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    As pointed out in the comments, the map $f$ that you constructed may not be $C^infty$. But you are almost there.



    Notice that in Tu's book the bump function $phi:mathbbR^nrightarrow mathbb R$ could be chosen so that its support $mathrmsuppphi$ is a compact subspace of $mathbbR^n$. Then $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$, being the image of a compact subspace under the continuous map $phi^-1:phi(V)rightarrow V$, is a compact subspace of $V$. Hence $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$ is a compact subspace of $M$. But $M$ is Hausdorff, so this means that $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$ is closed in $M$. Therefore, we have that $$mathrmsuppf=mathrmcl_M((rhocircphi)^-1(mathbbR^times))=mathrmcl_M(phi^-1(rho^-1(mathbbR^times))subsetmathrmcl_M(phi^-1(mathrmsupprho))=phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)subset V.$$
    From this follows that $f$ is smooth: If $pnotin V$, choose a chart about $p$ disjoint from $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$. (This is possible because $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$ is closed in $M$.) Then this chart is also disjoint from $mathrmsuppf$, so on this chart $f$ is identically $0$. Hence $f$ is $C^infty$
    at $p$. This proves that $f$ is $C^infty$ at every point not in $V$. By construction, $f$ is also $C^infty$ at every point in $V$. Hence $f$ is $C^infty$.



    Finally you check that $f$ satisfies all the properties required as a bump function at $q$ supported in $U$. This should not be difficult.






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      As pointed out in the comments, the map $f$ that you constructed may not be $C^infty$. But you are almost there.



      Notice that in Tu's book the bump function $phi:mathbbR^nrightarrow mathbb R$ could be chosen so that its support $mathrmsuppphi$ is a compact subspace of $mathbbR^n$. Then $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$, being the image of a compact subspace under the continuous map $phi^-1:phi(V)rightarrow V$, is a compact subspace of $V$. Hence $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$ is a compact subspace of $M$. But $M$ is Hausdorff, so this means that $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$ is closed in $M$. Therefore, we have that $$mathrmsuppf=mathrmcl_M((rhocircphi)^-1(mathbbR^times))=mathrmcl_M(phi^-1(rho^-1(mathbbR^times))subsetmathrmcl_M(phi^-1(mathrmsupprho))=phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)subset V.$$
      From this follows that $f$ is smooth: If $pnotin V$, choose a chart about $p$ disjoint from $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$. (This is possible because $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$ is closed in $M$.) Then this chart is also disjoint from $mathrmsuppf$, so on this chart $f$ is identically $0$. Hence $f$ is $C^infty$
      at $p$. This proves that $f$ is $C^infty$ at every point not in $V$. By construction, $f$ is also $C^infty$ at every point in $V$. Hence $f$ is $C^infty$.



      Finally you check that $f$ satisfies all the properties required as a bump function at $q$ supported in $U$. This should not be difficult.






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        As pointed out in the comments, the map $f$ that you constructed may not be $C^infty$. But you are almost there.



        Notice that in Tu's book the bump function $phi:mathbbR^nrightarrow mathbb R$ could be chosen so that its support $mathrmsuppphi$ is a compact subspace of $mathbbR^n$. Then $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$, being the image of a compact subspace under the continuous map $phi^-1:phi(V)rightarrow V$, is a compact subspace of $V$. Hence $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$ is a compact subspace of $M$. But $M$ is Hausdorff, so this means that $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$ is closed in $M$. Therefore, we have that $$mathrmsuppf=mathrmcl_M((rhocircphi)^-1(mathbbR^times))=mathrmcl_M(phi^-1(rho^-1(mathbbR^times))subsetmathrmcl_M(phi^-1(mathrmsupprho))=phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)subset V.$$
        From this follows that $f$ is smooth: If $pnotin V$, choose a chart about $p$ disjoint from $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$. (This is possible because $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$ is closed in $M$.) Then this chart is also disjoint from $mathrmsuppf$, so on this chart $f$ is identically $0$. Hence $f$ is $C^infty$
        at $p$. This proves that $f$ is $C^infty$ at every point not in $V$. By construction, $f$ is also $C^infty$ at every point in $V$. Hence $f$ is $C^infty$.



        Finally you check that $f$ satisfies all the properties required as a bump function at $q$ supported in $U$. This should not be difficult.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        As pointed out in the comments, the map $f$ that you constructed may not be $C^infty$. But you are almost there.



        Notice that in Tu's book the bump function $phi:mathbbR^nrightarrow mathbb R$ could be chosen so that its support $mathrmsuppphi$ is a compact subspace of $mathbbR^n$. Then $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$, being the image of a compact subspace under the continuous map $phi^-1:phi(V)rightarrow V$, is a compact subspace of $V$. Hence $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$ is a compact subspace of $M$. But $M$ is Hausdorff, so this means that $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$ is closed in $M$. Therefore, we have that $$mathrmsuppf=mathrmcl_M((rhocircphi)^-1(mathbbR^times))=mathrmcl_M(phi^-1(rho^-1(mathbbR^times))subsetmathrmcl_M(phi^-1(mathrmsupprho))=phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)subset V.$$
        From this follows that $f$ is smooth: If $pnotin V$, choose a chart about $p$ disjoint from $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$. (This is possible because $phi^-1(mathrmsupprho)$ is closed in $M$.) Then this chart is also disjoint from $mathrmsuppf$, so on this chart $f$ is identically $0$. Hence $f$ is $C^infty$
        at $p$. This proves that $f$ is $C^infty$ at every point not in $V$. By construction, $f$ is also $C^infty$ at every point in $V$. Hence $f$ is $C^infty$.



        Finally you check that $f$ satisfies all the properties required as a bump function at $q$ supported in $U$. This should not be difficult.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Sep 7 at 7:46









        user

        185




        185



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2348031%2fconstructing-a-smooth-bump-function-on-a-manifold%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            Carbon dioxide

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?