Can two projective surfaces intersect in points only?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $S_1,S_2subset mathbb P^n$ be two algebraic surfaces (we may assume that $n=3$). Is it possible that $S_1cap S_2=x_1,dots,x_N$ a finite set of points?
I can imagine the surfaces two be disjoint, if they are parallel; to intersect along a curve, which should be the general situation; and to intersect along a surface, which occurs if $S_1=S_2$. Thus it seems like everything else is possible and that's why I am curious whether a point intersection could also be possible.
geometry algebraic-geometry surfaces intersection-theory
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $S_1,S_2subset mathbb P^n$ be two algebraic surfaces (we may assume that $n=3$). Is it possible that $S_1cap S_2=x_1,dots,x_N$ a finite set of points?
I can imagine the surfaces two be disjoint, if they are parallel; to intersect along a curve, which should be the general situation; and to intersect along a surface, which occurs if $S_1=S_2$. Thus it seems like everything else is possible and that's why I am curious whether a point intersection could also be possible.
geometry algebraic-geometry surfaces intersection-theory
Do you means "surfaces" (subvarieties of dimension two) or "hypersurfaces" (subvarieties defined by a single equation). Two hypersurfaces in $Bbb P^n$ meet in a set of dimension at least $n-2$.
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Sep 7 at 9:29
I mean surfaces, i.e. two-dimensional subvarieties.
â James
Sep 7 at 11:49
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $S_1,S_2subset mathbb P^n$ be two algebraic surfaces (we may assume that $n=3$). Is it possible that $S_1cap S_2=x_1,dots,x_N$ a finite set of points?
I can imagine the surfaces two be disjoint, if they are parallel; to intersect along a curve, which should be the general situation; and to intersect along a surface, which occurs if $S_1=S_2$. Thus it seems like everything else is possible and that's why I am curious whether a point intersection could also be possible.
geometry algebraic-geometry surfaces intersection-theory
Let $S_1,S_2subset mathbb P^n$ be two algebraic surfaces (we may assume that $n=3$). Is it possible that $S_1cap S_2=x_1,dots,x_N$ a finite set of points?
I can imagine the surfaces two be disjoint, if they are parallel; to intersect along a curve, which should be the general situation; and to intersect along a surface, which occurs if $S_1=S_2$. Thus it seems like everything else is possible and that's why I am curious whether a point intersection could also be possible.
geometry algebraic-geometry surfaces intersection-theory
geometry algebraic-geometry surfaces intersection-theory
asked Sep 7 at 7:53
James
29613
29613
Do you means "surfaces" (subvarieties of dimension two) or "hypersurfaces" (subvarieties defined by a single equation). Two hypersurfaces in $Bbb P^n$ meet in a set of dimension at least $n-2$.
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Sep 7 at 9:29
I mean surfaces, i.e. two-dimensional subvarieties.
â James
Sep 7 at 11:49
add a comment |Â
Do you means "surfaces" (subvarieties of dimension two) or "hypersurfaces" (subvarieties defined by a single equation). Two hypersurfaces in $Bbb P^n$ meet in a set of dimension at least $n-2$.
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Sep 7 at 9:29
I mean surfaces, i.e. two-dimensional subvarieties.
â James
Sep 7 at 11:49
Do you means "surfaces" (subvarieties of dimension two) or "hypersurfaces" (subvarieties defined by a single equation). Two hypersurfaces in $Bbb P^n$ meet in a set of dimension at least $n-2$.
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Sep 7 at 9:29
Do you means "surfaces" (subvarieties of dimension two) or "hypersurfaces" (subvarieties defined by a single equation). Two hypersurfaces in $Bbb P^n$ meet in a set of dimension at least $n-2$.
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Sep 7 at 9:29
I mean surfaces, i.e. two-dimensional subvarieties.
â James
Sep 7 at 11:49
I mean surfaces, i.e. two-dimensional subvarieties.
â James
Sep 7 at 11:49
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
I am assuming the base field is algebraically closed.
You say rather casually in the question "we may assume that $n=3$", but the answer depends crucially on whether $n=3$ or not.
If $n=3$ then any two surfaces intersect in a set of dimension at least 1 (they cannot be disjoint, and there is no such thing as "parallel" in projective space). A reference is Hartshorne Theorem I.7.2.
If $n>3$ then certainly it is possible for two surfaces in $mathbf P^n$ to intersect in a finite set of points --- for example, try coordinate planes in $mathbf P^4$. Indeed, by the Theorem already mentioned, any two surfaces in $mathbf P^4$ must have nonempty intersection, and in general the intersection will be a finite set.
If $n>4$ then any dimension up to 2 is possible for the intersection of two surfaces, but there are statements analogous to the above for intersections of higher-dimensional algebraic subsets.
OK, I didn't know its depending so much on the dimension and was just assuming that we could assume $n=3$. Actually, I was thinking way to much of a plane in $mathbb P^n$ as a three-dimensional object in $mathbb C^n+1$. The reference you mentioned is actually very helpful! By intersection of coordinate planes you mean for example $S_1=x_0=x_1=0, S_2=x_2=x_3=0subsetmathbb P^4$ which intersect in the point $(0:0:0:0:1)$, correct?
â James
Sep 7 at 11:46
@James: yes, that's right.
â Asal Beag Dubh
Sep 7 at 12:02
Thank you very much! :)
â James
Sep 7 at 12:12
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
I am assuming the base field is algebraically closed.
You say rather casually in the question "we may assume that $n=3$", but the answer depends crucially on whether $n=3$ or not.
If $n=3$ then any two surfaces intersect in a set of dimension at least 1 (they cannot be disjoint, and there is no such thing as "parallel" in projective space). A reference is Hartshorne Theorem I.7.2.
If $n>3$ then certainly it is possible for two surfaces in $mathbf P^n$ to intersect in a finite set of points --- for example, try coordinate planes in $mathbf P^4$. Indeed, by the Theorem already mentioned, any two surfaces in $mathbf P^4$ must have nonempty intersection, and in general the intersection will be a finite set.
If $n>4$ then any dimension up to 2 is possible for the intersection of two surfaces, but there are statements analogous to the above for intersections of higher-dimensional algebraic subsets.
OK, I didn't know its depending so much on the dimension and was just assuming that we could assume $n=3$. Actually, I was thinking way to much of a plane in $mathbb P^n$ as a three-dimensional object in $mathbb C^n+1$. The reference you mentioned is actually very helpful! By intersection of coordinate planes you mean for example $S_1=x_0=x_1=0, S_2=x_2=x_3=0subsetmathbb P^4$ which intersect in the point $(0:0:0:0:1)$, correct?
â James
Sep 7 at 11:46
@James: yes, that's right.
â Asal Beag Dubh
Sep 7 at 12:02
Thank you very much! :)
â James
Sep 7 at 12:12
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
I am assuming the base field is algebraically closed.
You say rather casually in the question "we may assume that $n=3$", but the answer depends crucially on whether $n=3$ or not.
If $n=3$ then any two surfaces intersect in a set of dimension at least 1 (they cannot be disjoint, and there is no such thing as "parallel" in projective space). A reference is Hartshorne Theorem I.7.2.
If $n>3$ then certainly it is possible for two surfaces in $mathbf P^n$ to intersect in a finite set of points --- for example, try coordinate planes in $mathbf P^4$. Indeed, by the Theorem already mentioned, any two surfaces in $mathbf P^4$ must have nonempty intersection, and in general the intersection will be a finite set.
If $n>4$ then any dimension up to 2 is possible for the intersection of two surfaces, but there are statements analogous to the above for intersections of higher-dimensional algebraic subsets.
OK, I didn't know its depending so much on the dimension and was just assuming that we could assume $n=3$. Actually, I was thinking way to much of a plane in $mathbb P^n$ as a three-dimensional object in $mathbb C^n+1$. The reference you mentioned is actually very helpful! By intersection of coordinate planes you mean for example $S_1=x_0=x_1=0, S_2=x_2=x_3=0subsetmathbb P^4$ which intersect in the point $(0:0:0:0:1)$, correct?
â James
Sep 7 at 11:46
@James: yes, that's right.
â Asal Beag Dubh
Sep 7 at 12:02
Thank you very much! :)
â James
Sep 7 at 12:12
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
I am assuming the base field is algebraically closed.
You say rather casually in the question "we may assume that $n=3$", but the answer depends crucially on whether $n=3$ or not.
If $n=3$ then any two surfaces intersect in a set of dimension at least 1 (they cannot be disjoint, and there is no such thing as "parallel" in projective space). A reference is Hartshorne Theorem I.7.2.
If $n>3$ then certainly it is possible for two surfaces in $mathbf P^n$ to intersect in a finite set of points --- for example, try coordinate planes in $mathbf P^4$. Indeed, by the Theorem already mentioned, any two surfaces in $mathbf P^4$ must have nonempty intersection, and in general the intersection will be a finite set.
If $n>4$ then any dimension up to 2 is possible for the intersection of two surfaces, but there are statements analogous to the above for intersections of higher-dimensional algebraic subsets.
I am assuming the base field is algebraically closed.
You say rather casually in the question "we may assume that $n=3$", but the answer depends crucially on whether $n=3$ or not.
If $n=3$ then any two surfaces intersect in a set of dimension at least 1 (they cannot be disjoint, and there is no such thing as "parallel" in projective space). A reference is Hartshorne Theorem I.7.2.
If $n>3$ then certainly it is possible for two surfaces in $mathbf P^n$ to intersect in a finite set of points --- for example, try coordinate planes in $mathbf P^4$. Indeed, by the Theorem already mentioned, any two surfaces in $mathbf P^4$ must have nonempty intersection, and in general the intersection will be a finite set.
If $n>4$ then any dimension up to 2 is possible for the intersection of two surfaces, but there are statements analogous to the above for intersections of higher-dimensional algebraic subsets.
edited Sep 7 at 9:21
answered Sep 7 at 9:10
Asal Beag Dubh
37814
37814
OK, I didn't know its depending so much on the dimension and was just assuming that we could assume $n=3$. Actually, I was thinking way to much of a plane in $mathbb P^n$ as a three-dimensional object in $mathbb C^n+1$. The reference you mentioned is actually very helpful! By intersection of coordinate planes you mean for example $S_1=x_0=x_1=0, S_2=x_2=x_3=0subsetmathbb P^4$ which intersect in the point $(0:0:0:0:1)$, correct?
â James
Sep 7 at 11:46
@James: yes, that's right.
â Asal Beag Dubh
Sep 7 at 12:02
Thank you very much! :)
â James
Sep 7 at 12:12
add a comment |Â
OK, I didn't know its depending so much on the dimension and was just assuming that we could assume $n=3$. Actually, I was thinking way to much of a plane in $mathbb P^n$ as a three-dimensional object in $mathbb C^n+1$. The reference you mentioned is actually very helpful! By intersection of coordinate planes you mean for example $S_1=x_0=x_1=0, S_2=x_2=x_3=0subsetmathbb P^4$ which intersect in the point $(0:0:0:0:1)$, correct?
â James
Sep 7 at 11:46
@James: yes, that's right.
â Asal Beag Dubh
Sep 7 at 12:02
Thank you very much! :)
â James
Sep 7 at 12:12
OK, I didn't know its depending so much on the dimension and was just assuming that we could assume $n=3$. Actually, I was thinking way to much of a plane in $mathbb P^n$ as a three-dimensional object in $mathbb C^n+1$. The reference you mentioned is actually very helpful! By intersection of coordinate planes you mean for example $S_1=x_0=x_1=0, S_2=x_2=x_3=0subsetmathbb P^4$ which intersect in the point $(0:0:0:0:1)$, correct?
â James
Sep 7 at 11:46
OK, I didn't know its depending so much on the dimension and was just assuming that we could assume $n=3$. Actually, I was thinking way to much of a plane in $mathbb P^n$ as a three-dimensional object in $mathbb C^n+1$. The reference you mentioned is actually very helpful! By intersection of coordinate planes you mean for example $S_1=x_0=x_1=0, S_2=x_2=x_3=0subsetmathbb P^4$ which intersect in the point $(0:0:0:0:1)$, correct?
â James
Sep 7 at 11:46
@James: yes, that's right.
â Asal Beag Dubh
Sep 7 at 12:02
@James: yes, that's right.
â Asal Beag Dubh
Sep 7 at 12:02
Thank you very much! :)
â James
Sep 7 at 12:12
Thank you very much! :)
â James
Sep 7 at 12:12
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2908373%2fcan-two-projective-surfaces-intersect-in-points-only%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Do you means "surfaces" (subvarieties of dimension two) or "hypersurfaces" (subvarieties defined by a single equation). Two hypersurfaces in $Bbb P^n$ meet in a set of dimension at least $n-2$.
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Sep 7 at 9:29
I mean surfaces, i.e. two-dimensional subvarieties.
â James
Sep 7 at 11:49