Proof check: the product of compact sets is compact

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I want to prove that if $E$ and $F$ are compact sets, then $Etimes F$ is compact. Here's my proof:




Let $G_alpha$ be an open cover of $E times F$. For each $(a,b) in E times F$, we can choose some $alpha$ such that $(a,b) in G_alpha$. Since $G_alpha$ is open, the point $(a,b)$ is contained in some open box $U_(a,b) times V_(a,b) subset G_alpha$, where $U_(a,b) subset E$ and $V_(a,b) subset F$.



Suppose we fix $a$ and vary $b$. Then for every point $(a,b)$ we find that the point is contained in an open box in the product $E times F$, and that box is then itself the product of a subset of $E$ with a subset of $F$. Proceeding in this manner, we observe that the collection of sets $V_(a,b)_bin F$ is an open cover of $F$. Since by assumption $F$ is compact, we can find a finite cover $V_(a,b_j(a))$ of $F$ that consists of finitely many open sets containing points $(a,b_j(a))$.



Now let $U_a = bigcap_j U_(a,b_j(a))$. Since $U_a$ is the intersection of finitely many open sets, it is itself open. Since $E$ is compact, there are finitely many $a_i$ such that $U_a_i$ forms an open cover of $E$. Then it follows that the collection of sets $U_a_itimes V_(a_i,b_j (a_i))$ (for all $i$ and $j$) is a finite subcover of $E times F$, hence $E times F$ is compact.




Since I am not so good at topology yet, I am not entirely sure that this is correct. If is is correct, then there is something I can do to simplify it? If it is wrong, how could I fix it?










share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    I want to prove that if $E$ and $F$ are compact sets, then $Etimes F$ is compact. Here's my proof:




    Let $G_alpha$ be an open cover of $E times F$. For each $(a,b) in E times F$, we can choose some $alpha$ such that $(a,b) in G_alpha$. Since $G_alpha$ is open, the point $(a,b)$ is contained in some open box $U_(a,b) times V_(a,b) subset G_alpha$, where $U_(a,b) subset E$ and $V_(a,b) subset F$.



    Suppose we fix $a$ and vary $b$. Then for every point $(a,b)$ we find that the point is contained in an open box in the product $E times F$, and that box is then itself the product of a subset of $E$ with a subset of $F$. Proceeding in this manner, we observe that the collection of sets $V_(a,b)_bin F$ is an open cover of $F$. Since by assumption $F$ is compact, we can find a finite cover $V_(a,b_j(a))$ of $F$ that consists of finitely many open sets containing points $(a,b_j(a))$.



    Now let $U_a = bigcap_j U_(a,b_j(a))$. Since $U_a$ is the intersection of finitely many open sets, it is itself open. Since $E$ is compact, there are finitely many $a_i$ such that $U_a_i$ forms an open cover of $E$. Then it follows that the collection of sets $U_a_itimes V_(a_i,b_j (a_i))$ (for all $i$ and $j$) is a finite subcover of $E times F$, hence $E times F$ is compact.




    Since I am not so good at topology yet, I am not entirely sure that this is correct. If is is correct, then there is something I can do to simplify it? If it is wrong, how could I fix it?










    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      I want to prove that if $E$ and $F$ are compact sets, then $Etimes F$ is compact. Here's my proof:




      Let $G_alpha$ be an open cover of $E times F$. For each $(a,b) in E times F$, we can choose some $alpha$ such that $(a,b) in G_alpha$. Since $G_alpha$ is open, the point $(a,b)$ is contained in some open box $U_(a,b) times V_(a,b) subset G_alpha$, where $U_(a,b) subset E$ and $V_(a,b) subset F$.



      Suppose we fix $a$ and vary $b$. Then for every point $(a,b)$ we find that the point is contained in an open box in the product $E times F$, and that box is then itself the product of a subset of $E$ with a subset of $F$. Proceeding in this manner, we observe that the collection of sets $V_(a,b)_bin F$ is an open cover of $F$. Since by assumption $F$ is compact, we can find a finite cover $V_(a,b_j(a))$ of $F$ that consists of finitely many open sets containing points $(a,b_j(a))$.



      Now let $U_a = bigcap_j U_(a,b_j(a))$. Since $U_a$ is the intersection of finitely many open sets, it is itself open. Since $E$ is compact, there are finitely many $a_i$ such that $U_a_i$ forms an open cover of $E$. Then it follows that the collection of sets $U_a_itimes V_(a_i,b_j (a_i))$ (for all $i$ and $j$) is a finite subcover of $E times F$, hence $E times F$ is compact.




      Since I am not so good at topology yet, I am not entirely sure that this is correct. If is is correct, then there is something I can do to simplify it? If it is wrong, how could I fix it?










      share|cite|improve this question













      I want to prove that if $E$ and $F$ are compact sets, then $Etimes F$ is compact. Here's my proof:




      Let $G_alpha$ be an open cover of $E times F$. For each $(a,b) in E times F$, we can choose some $alpha$ such that $(a,b) in G_alpha$. Since $G_alpha$ is open, the point $(a,b)$ is contained in some open box $U_(a,b) times V_(a,b) subset G_alpha$, where $U_(a,b) subset E$ and $V_(a,b) subset F$.



      Suppose we fix $a$ and vary $b$. Then for every point $(a,b)$ we find that the point is contained in an open box in the product $E times F$, and that box is then itself the product of a subset of $E$ with a subset of $F$. Proceeding in this manner, we observe that the collection of sets $V_(a,b)_bin F$ is an open cover of $F$. Since by assumption $F$ is compact, we can find a finite cover $V_(a,b_j(a))$ of $F$ that consists of finitely many open sets containing points $(a,b_j(a))$.



      Now let $U_a = bigcap_j U_(a,b_j(a))$. Since $U_a$ is the intersection of finitely many open sets, it is itself open. Since $E$ is compact, there are finitely many $a_i$ such that $U_a_i$ forms an open cover of $E$. Then it follows that the collection of sets $U_a_itimes V_(a_i,b_j (a_i))$ (for all $i$ and $j$) is a finite subcover of $E times F$, hence $E times F$ is compact.




      Since I am not so good at topology yet, I am not entirely sure that this is correct. If is is correct, then there is something I can do to simplify it? If it is wrong, how could I fix it?







      general-topology proof-verification






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Sep 7 at 7:55









      Gabriel Ribeiro

      1,171421




      1,171421




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Your proof is correct and this is the standard proof found in most texts, commonly referred to as the "tube lemma".



          Perhaps to get more familiarity, look at a nice application: Whitehead's theorem on quotient map. This result is used a lot in algebraic topology.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2908375%2fproof-check-the-product-of-compact-sets-is-compact%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted










            Your proof is correct and this is the standard proof found in most texts, commonly referred to as the "tube lemma".



            Perhaps to get more familiarity, look at a nice application: Whitehead's theorem on quotient map. This result is used a lot in algebraic topology.






            share|cite|improve this answer
























              up vote
              2
              down vote



              accepted










              Your proof is correct and this is the standard proof found in most texts, commonly referred to as the "tube lemma".



              Perhaps to get more familiarity, look at a nice application: Whitehead's theorem on quotient map. This result is used a lot in algebraic topology.






              share|cite|improve this answer






















                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted






                Your proof is correct and this is the standard proof found in most texts, commonly referred to as the "tube lemma".



                Perhaps to get more familiarity, look at a nice application: Whitehead's theorem on quotient map. This result is used a lot in algebraic topology.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Your proof is correct and this is the standard proof found in most texts, commonly referred to as the "tube lemma".



                Perhaps to get more familiarity, look at a nice application: Whitehead's theorem on quotient map. This result is used a lot in algebraic topology.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Sep 7 at 8:08









                Cyryl L.

                1,8632821




                1,8632821



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2908375%2fproof-check-the-product-of-compact-sets-is-compact%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    這個網誌中的熱門文章

                    How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                    Carbon dioxide

                    Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?