Monotonicity of the function $(1+x)^frac1xleft(1+frac1xright)^x$.
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
Let $f(x)=(1+x)^frac1xleft(1+frac1xright)^x, 0<xleq 1.$
Prove that $f$ is strictly increasing and $e<f(x)leq 4.$
In order to study the Monotonicity of $f$, let
$$g(x)=log f(x)=frac1xlog (1+x)+xlog left(1+frac1xright).$$
And $f$ and $g$ has the same Monotonicity. By computation,
$$g'(x)=frac1x^2left(fracx1+x-log (1+x)right)+log left(1+frac1xright)-frac11+x.$$
As we know $fracx1+x-log (1+x)leq 0$ and $log left(1+frac1xright)-frac11+xgeq 0$. So it does not determine the sign of $g'(x)$.
If we compute the second derivative $g''(x)$, you will find it is also difficult to determine the sign of $g''(x)$.
Our main goal is to prove $$frac1x^2left(fracx1+x-log (1+x)right)+log left(1+frac1xright)-frac11+x>0.$$
Is there some tricks to prove this result. Any help and hint will welcome.
calculus analysis inequality exponential-function tangent-line-method
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
Let $f(x)=(1+x)^frac1xleft(1+frac1xright)^x, 0<xleq 1.$
Prove that $f$ is strictly increasing and $e<f(x)leq 4.$
In order to study the Monotonicity of $f$, let
$$g(x)=log f(x)=frac1xlog (1+x)+xlog left(1+frac1xright).$$
And $f$ and $g$ has the same Monotonicity. By computation,
$$g'(x)=frac1x^2left(fracx1+x-log (1+x)right)+log left(1+frac1xright)-frac11+x.$$
As we know $fracx1+x-log (1+x)leq 0$ and $log left(1+frac1xright)-frac11+xgeq 0$. So it does not determine the sign of $g'(x)$.
If we compute the second derivative $g''(x)$, you will find it is also difficult to determine the sign of $g''(x)$.
Our main goal is to prove $$frac1x^2left(fracx1+x-log (1+x)right)+log left(1+frac1xright)-frac11+x>0.$$
Is there some tricks to prove this result. Any help and hint will welcome.
calculus analysis inequality exponential-function tangent-line-method
1
I believe that the solution to this problem is to use the symmetry of function $f(x)$. The symmetry is $f(x)=f(1/x)$.
â MathOverview
Sep 7 at 12:11
Just an observation: If you manage to at least show that $f'(x) not= 0$ for all $x in (0,1]$, then you are done because $lim_x to 0^+ f(x) = e < 4 = f(1),$ so there is no other option for $f$ other than to be strictly increasing on $(0, 1]$.
â Sobi
Sep 7 at 12:15
Is this related to math.stackexchange.com/q/2899031/42969, or is the resemblance coincidental?
â Martin R
Sep 7 at 12:22
@ Martin Rï¼ thank you for your hint of math.stackexchange.com/q/2899031/42969 Actually, the question I asked is confused me for several weeks, and I have seen math.stackexchange.com/q/2899031/42969 before, and then there is only one answers. And now I see there are several answers. And one answer use the result I have posted. It is resemblance coincidental.
â Riemann
Sep 7 at 12:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
Let $f(x)=(1+x)^frac1xleft(1+frac1xright)^x, 0<xleq 1.$
Prove that $f$ is strictly increasing and $e<f(x)leq 4.$
In order to study the Monotonicity of $f$, let
$$g(x)=log f(x)=frac1xlog (1+x)+xlog left(1+frac1xright).$$
And $f$ and $g$ has the same Monotonicity. By computation,
$$g'(x)=frac1x^2left(fracx1+x-log (1+x)right)+log left(1+frac1xright)-frac11+x.$$
As we know $fracx1+x-log (1+x)leq 0$ and $log left(1+frac1xright)-frac11+xgeq 0$. So it does not determine the sign of $g'(x)$.
If we compute the second derivative $g''(x)$, you will find it is also difficult to determine the sign of $g''(x)$.
Our main goal is to prove $$frac1x^2left(fracx1+x-log (1+x)right)+log left(1+frac1xright)-frac11+x>0.$$
Is there some tricks to prove this result. Any help and hint will welcome.
calculus analysis inequality exponential-function tangent-line-method
Let $f(x)=(1+x)^frac1xleft(1+frac1xright)^x, 0<xleq 1.$
Prove that $f$ is strictly increasing and $e<f(x)leq 4.$
In order to study the Monotonicity of $f$, let
$$g(x)=log f(x)=frac1xlog (1+x)+xlog left(1+frac1xright).$$
And $f$ and $g$ has the same Monotonicity. By computation,
$$g'(x)=frac1x^2left(fracx1+x-log (1+x)right)+log left(1+frac1xright)-frac11+x.$$
As we know $fracx1+x-log (1+x)leq 0$ and $log left(1+frac1xright)-frac11+xgeq 0$. So it does not determine the sign of $g'(x)$.
If we compute the second derivative $g''(x)$, you will find it is also difficult to determine the sign of $g''(x)$.
Our main goal is to prove $$frac1x^2left(fracx1+x-log (1+x)right)+log left(1+frac1xright)-frac11+x>0.$$
Is there some tricks to prove this result. Any help and hint will welcome.
calculus analysis inequality exponential-function tangent-line-method
calculus analysis inequality exponential-function tangent-line-method
edited Sep 7 at 16:21
Michael Rozenberg
89.2k1582179
89.2k1582179
asked Sep 7 at 11:57
Riemann
3,0881321
3,0881321
1
I believe that the solution to this problem is to use the symmetry of function $f(x)$. The symmetry is $f(x)=f(1/x)$.
â MathOverview
Sep 7 at 12:11
Just an observation: If you manage to at least show that $f'(x) not= 0$ for all $x in (0,1]$, then you are done because $lim_x to 0^+ f(x) = e < 4 = f(1),$ so there is no other option for $f$ other than to be strictly increasing on $(0, 1]$.
â Sobi
Sep 7 at 12:15
Is this related to math.stackexchange.com/q/2899031/42969, or is the resemblance coincidental?
â Martin R
Sep 7 at 12:22
@ Martin Rï¼ thank you for your hint of math.stackexchange.com/q/2899031/42969 Actually, the question I asked is confused me for several weeks, and I have seen math.stackexchange.com/q/2899031/42969 before, and then there is only one answers. And now I see there are several answers. And one answer use the result I have posted. It is resemblance coincidental.
â Riemann
Sep 7 at 12:26
add a comment |Â
1
I believe that the solution to this problem is to use the symmetry of function $f(x)$. The symmetry is $f(x)=f(1/x)$.
â MathOverview
Sep 7 at 12:11
Just an observation: If you manage to at least show that $f'(x) not= 0$ for all $x in (0,1]$, then you are done because $lim_x to 0^+ f(x) = e < 4 = f(1),$ so there is no other option for $f$ other than to be strictly increasing on $(0, 1]$.
â Sobi
Sep 7 at 12:15
Is this related to math.stackexchange.com/q/2899031/42969, or is the resemblance coincidental?
â Martin R
Sep 7 at 12:22
@ Martin Rï¼ thank you for your hint of math.stackexchange.com/q/2899031/42969 Actually, the question I asked is confused me for several weeks, and I have seen math.stackexchange.com/q/2899031/42969 before, and then there is only one answers. And now I see there are several answers. And one answer use the result I have posted. It is resemblance coincidental.
â Riemann
Sep 7 at 12:26
1
1
I believe that the solution to this problem is to use the symmetry of function $f(x)$. The symmetry is $f(x)=f(1/x)$.
â MathOverview
Sep 7 at 12:11
I believe that the solution to this problem is to use the symmetry of function $f(x)$. The symmetry is $f(x)=f(1/x)$.
â MathOverview
Sep 7 at 12:11
Just an observation: If you manage to at least show that $f'(x) not= 0$ for all $x in (0,1]$, then you are done because $lim_x to 0^+ f(x) = e < 4 = f(1),$ so there is no other option for $f$ other than to be strictly increasing on $(0, 1]$.
â Sobi
Sep 7 at 12:15
Just an observation: If you manage to at least show that $f'(x) not= 0$ for all $x in (0,1]$, then you are done because $lim_x to 0^+ f(x) = e < 4 = f(1),$ so there is no other option for $f$ other than to be strictly increasing on $(0, 1]$.
â Sobi
Sep 7 at 12:15
Is this related to math.stackexchange.com/q/2899031/42969, or is the resemblance coincidental?
â Martin R
Sep 7 at 12:22
Is this related to math.stackexchange.com/q/2899031/42969, or is the resemblance coincidental?
â Martin R
Sep 7 at 12:22
@ Martin Rï¼ thank you for your hint of math.stackexchange.com/q/2899031/42969 Actually, the question I asked is confused me for several weeks, and I have seen math.stackexchange.com/q/2899031/42969 before, and then there is only one answers. And now I see there are several answers. And one answer use the result I have posted. It is resemblance coincidental.
â Riemann
Sep 7 at 12:26
@ Martin Rï¼ thank you for your hint of math.stackexchange.com/q/2899031/42969 Actually, the question I asked is confused me for several weeks, and I have seen math.stackexchange.com/q/2899031/42969 before, and then there is only one answers. And now I see there are several answers. And one answer use the result I have posted. It is resemblance coincidental.
â Riemann
Sep 7 at 12:26
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
The right inequality.
We can use the TL method here.
We need to prove that $$(1+a)^b(1+b)^aleq4$$
for $a>0$, $b>0$ such that $ab=1$, which is $$fracln(1+a)a+fracln(1+b)bleq2ln2.$$
But $$sum_cycleft(ln2-fracln(1+a)aright)=sum_cycf(a),$$
where $f(a)=ln2-fracln(1+a)a-(ln2-0.5)ln a$.
Easy to show that $f(a)geq0$ for all $0<aleq11$.
But for $a>11$ we obtain: $$(1+a)^b(1+b)^a=(1+a)^frac1aleft(1+frac1aright)^a<(1+11)^frac111e<4.$$
The left inequality.
We need to prove that:
$$frac1xln(1+x)+xlnleft(1+frac1xright)>1$$ or $g(x)>0$, where
$$g(x)=(1+x^2)ln(1+x)-x^2lnx-x.$$
Indeed, $$g'(x)=2xln(1+x)+frac1+x^21+x-2xlnx-x-1=2xleft(lnleft(1+frac1xright)-frac11+xright)>0$$ because
$$left(lnleft(1+frac1xright)-frac11+xright)'=-frac1x(1+x)^2<0$$ and
$$lnleft(1+frac11right)-frac11+1>0.$$
Id est, $$g(x)>lim_xrightarrow0^+g(x)=0$$ and we proved that $e<f(x)leq4.$
Now, we'll prove that $f$ increases on $(0,1].$
By your work we need to prove that
$$frac1x^2left(fracx1+x-ln(1+x)right)+lnleft(1+frac1xright)-frac11+xgeq0$$ for all $0<xleq1$ or
$$(x^2-1)ln(1+x)-x^2lnx+frac(1-x)x1+xgeq0$$ and since $$lnxleqfrac2(x-1)1+x,$$ it's enough to prove that
$$-(1-x^2)ln(1+x)+frac2x^2(1-x)1+x+frac(1-x)x1+xgeq0$$ or
$$ln(1+x)leqfracx(2x+1)(1+x)^2,$$ which is smooth.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Michael Rozenberg's answer has it all.
Here are two remaining proofs in Michael Rozenberg's answer:
- Show: $lnxleqfrac2(x-1)1+x$
We have $ln(1+y)leqfrac2y2+y$ for $-1<y<0$ (see e.g. in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_logarithmic_identities#Inequalities),
i.e. $ln(x)leqfrac2(x-1)1+x$ for $0<x<1$. This is exactly what needs to be shown.
- Show: $ln(1+x)leqfracx(2x+1)(1+x)^2$
We have $ln(1+x)leqfracxsqrt1+x$ (see e.g. in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_logarithmic_identities#Inequalities), so we may prove
$frac1sqrt1+xleqfrac2x+1(1+x)^2$ or $(1+x)^3-(1+2x)^2leq 0$ or $x^2 - x - 1<0$ or $x( 1-x) + 1>0$ which is true since $1-x ge 0$.
Sorry @Andreas , I have made a mistake. $g'(x)$ should be $g'(x)=frac1x^2left(fracx1+x-log (1+x)right)+log left(1+frac1xright)-frac11+x.$
â Riemann
Sep 7 at 13:11
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Using
$$dfracxx+1<xlnleft(1+dfrac1xright)<1$$
and for $xtodfrac1x$
$$dfrac1x+1<dfrac1xlnleft(1+xright)<1$$
then
$$dfrac1xlnleft(1+xright)+xlnleft(1+dfrac1xright)>1$$
You trick is very nice.Can you give some help for the fonotonicity of the function $f(x)$.Thank you !
â Riemann
Sep 7 at 14:37
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
The right inequality.
We can use the TL method here.
We need to prove that $$(1+a)^b(1+b)^aleq4$$
for $a>0$, $b>0$ such that $ab=1$, which is $$fracln(1+a)a+fracln(1+b)bleq2ln2.$$
But $$sum_cycleft(ln2-fracln(1+a)aright)=sum_cycf(a),$$
where $f(a)=ln2-fracln(1+a)a-(ln2-0.5)ln a$.
Easy to show that $f(a)geq0$ for all $0<aleq11$.
But for $a>11$ we obtain: $$(1+a)^b(1+b)^a=(1+a)^frac1aleft(1+frac1aright)^a<(1+11)^frac111e<4.$$
The left inequality.
We need to prove that:
$$frac1xln(1+x)+xlnleft(1+frac1xright)>1$$ or $g(x)>0$, where
$$g(x)=(1+x^2)ln(1+x)-x^2lnx-x.$$
Indeed, $$g'(x)=2xln(1+x)+frac1+x^21+x-2xlnx-x-1=2xleft(lnleft(1+frac1xright)-frac11+xright)>0$$ because
$$left(lnleft(1+frac1xright)-frac11+xright)'=-frac1x(1+x)^2<0$$ and
$$lnleft(1+frac11right)-frac11+1>0.$$
Id est, $$g(x)>lim_xrightarrow0^+g(x)=0$$ and we proved that $e<f(x)leq4.$
Now, we'll prove that $f$ increases on $(0,1].$
By your work we need to prove that
$$frac1x^2left(fracx1+x-ln(1+x)right)+lnleft(1+frac1xright)-frac11+xgeq0$$ for all $0<xleq1$ or
$$(x^2-1)ln(1+x)-x^2lnx+frac(1-x)x1+xgeq0$$ and since $$lnxleqfrac2(x-1)1+x,$$ it's enough to prove that
$$-(1-x^2)ln(1+x)+frac2x^2(1-x)1+x+frac(1-x)x1+xgeq0$$ or
$$ln(1+x)leqfracx(2x+1)(1+x)^2,$$ which is smooth.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
The right inequality.
We can use the TL method here.
We need to prove that $$(1+a)^b(1+b)^aleq4$$
for $a>0$, $b>0$ such that $ab=1$, which is $$fracln(1+a)a+fracln(1+b)bleq2ln2.$$
But $$sum_cycleft(ln2-fracln(1+a)aright)=sum_cycf(a),$$
where $f(a)=ln2-fracln(1+a)a-(ln2-0.5)ln a$.
Easy to show that $f(a)geq0$ for all $0<aleq11$.
But for $a>11$ we obtain: $$(1+a)^b(1+b)^a=(1+a)^frac1aleft(1+frac1aright)^a<(1+11)^frac111e<4.$$
The left inequality.
We need to prove that:
$$frac1xln(1+x)+xlnleft(1+frac1xright)>1$$ or $g(x)>0$, where
$$g(x)=(1+x^2)ln(1+x)-x^2lnx-x.$$
Indeed, $$g'(x)=2xln(1+x)+frac1+x^21+x-2xlnx-x-1=2xleft(lnleft(1+frac1xright)-frac11+xright)>0$$ because
$$left(lnleft(1+frac1xright)-frac11+xright)'=-frac1x(1+x)^2<0$$ and
$$lnleft(1+frac11right)-frac11+1>0.$$
Id est, $$g(x)>lim_xrightarrow0^+g(x)=0$$ and we proved that $e<f(x)leq4.$
Now, we'll prove that $f$ increases on $(0,1].$
By your work we need to prove that
$$frac1x^2left(fracx1+x-ln(1+x)right)+lnleft(1+frac1xright)-frac11+xgeq0$$ for all $0<xleq1$ or
$$(x^2-1)ln(1+x)-x^2lnx+frac(1-x)x1+xgeq0$$ and since $$lnxleqfrac2(x-1)1+x,$$ it's enough to prove that
$$-(1-x^2)ln(1+x)+frac2x^2(1-x)1+x+frac(1-x)x1+xgeq0$$ or
$$ln(1+x)leqfracx(2x+1)(1+x)^2,$$ which is smooth.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
The right inequality.
We can use the TL method here.
We need to prove that $$(1+a)^b(1+b)^aleq4$$
for $a>0$, $b>0$ such that $ab=1$, which is $$fracln(1+a)a+fracln(1+b)bleq2ln2.$$
But $$sum_cycleft(ln2-fracln(1+a)aright)=sum_cycf(a),$$
where $f(a)=ln2-fracln(1+a)a-(ln2-0.5)ln a$.
Easy to show that $f(a)geq0$ for all $0<aleq11$.
But for $a>11$ we obtain: $$(1+a)^b(1+b)^a=(1+a)^frac1aleft(1+frac1aright)^a<(1+11)^frac111e<4.$$
The left inequality.
We need to prove that:
$$frac1xln(1+x)+xlnleft(1+frac1xright)>1$$ or $g(x)>0$, where
$$g(x)=(1+x^2)ln(1+x)-x^2lnx-x.$$
Indeed, $$g'(x)=2xln(1+x)+frac1+x^21+x-2xlnx-x-1=2xleft(lnleft(1+frac1xright)-frac11+xright)>0$$ because
$$left(lnleft(1+frac1xright)-frac11+xright)'=-frac1x(1+x)^2<0$$ and
$$lnleft(1+frac11right)-frac11+1>0.$$
Id est, $$g(x)>lim_xrightarrow0^+g(x)=0$$ and we proved that $e<f(x)leq4.$
Now, we'll prove that $f$ increases on $(0,1].$
By your work we need to prove that
$$frac1x^2left(fracx1+x-ln(1+x)right)+lnleft(1+frac1xright)-frac11+xgeq0$$ for all $0<xleq1$ or
$$(x^2-1)ln(1+x)-x^2lnx+frac(1-x)x1+xgeq0$$ and since $$lnxleqfrac2(x-1)1+x,$$ it's enough to prove that
$$-(1-x^2)ln(1+x)+frac2x^2(1-x)1+x+frac(1-x)x1+xgeq0$$ or
$$ln(1+x)leqfracx(2x+1)(1+x)^2,$$ which is smooth.
The right inequality.
We can use the TL method here.
We need to prove that $$(1+a)^b(1+b)^aleq4$$
for $a>0$, $b>0$ such that $ab=1$, which is $$fracln(1+a)a+fracln(1+b)bleq2ln2.$$
But $$sum_cycleft(ln2-fracln(1+a)aright)=sum_cycf(a),$$
where $f(a)=ln2-fracln(1+a)a-(ln2-0.5)ln a$.
Easy to show that $f(a)geq0$ for all $0<aleq11$.
But for $a>11$ we obtain: $$(1+a)^b(1+b)^a=(1+a)^frac1aleft(1+frac1aright)^a<(1+11)^frac111e<4.$$
The left inequality.
We need to prove that:
$$frac1xln(1+x)+xlnleft(1+frac1xright)>1$$ or $g(x)>0$, where
$$g(x)=(1+x^2)ln(1+x)-x^2lnx-x.$$
Indeed, $$g'(x)=2xln(1+x)+frac1+x^21+x-2xlnx-x-1=2xleft(lnleft(1+frac1xright)-frac11+xright)>0$$ because
$$left(lnleft(1+frac1xright)-frac11+xright)'=-frac1x(1+x)^2<0$$ and
$$lnleft(1+frac11right)-frac11+1>0.$$
Id est, $$g(x)>lim_xrightarrow0^+g(x)=0$$ and we proved that $e<f(x)leq4.$
Now, we'll prove that $f$ increases on $(0,1].$
By your work we need to prove that
$$frac1x^2left(fracx1+x-ln(1+x)right)+lnleft(1+frac1xright)-frac11+xgeq0$$ for all $0<xleq1$ or
$$(x^2-1)ln(1+x)-x^2lnx+frac(1-x)x1+xgeq0$$ and since $$lnxleqfrac2(x-1)1+x,$$ it's enough to prove that
$$-(1-x^2)ln(1+x)+frac2x^2(1-x)1+x+frac(1-x)x1+xgeq0$$ or
$$ln(1+x)leqfracx(2x+1)(1+x)^2,$$ which is smooth.
edited Sep 8 at 5:59
answered Sep 7 at 16:19
Michael Rozenberg
89.2k1582179
89.2k1582179
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Michael Rozenberg's answer has it all.
Here are two remaining proofs in Michael Rozenberg's answer:
- Show: $lnxleqfrac2(x-1)1+x$
We have $ln(1+y)leqfrac2y2+y$ for $-1<y<0$ (see e.g. in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_logarithmic_identities#Inequalities),
i.e. $ln(x)leqfrac2(x-1)1+x$ for $0<x<1$. This is exactly what needs to be shown.
- Show: $ln(1+x)leqfracx(2x+1)(1+x)^2$
We have $ln(1+x)leqfracxsqrt1+x$ (see e.g. in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_logarithmic_identities#Inequalities), so we may prove
$frac1sqrt1+xleqfrac2x+1(1+x)^2$ or $(1+x)^3-(1+2x)^2leq 0$ or $x^2 - x - 1<0$ or $x( 1-x) + 1>0$ which is true since $1-x ge 0$.
Sorry @Andreas , I have made a mistake. $g'(x)$ should be $g'(x)=frac1x^2left(fracx1+x-log (1+x)right)+log left(1+frac1xright)-frac11+x.$
â Riemann
Sep 7 at 13:11
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Michael Rozenberg's answer has it all.
Here are two remaining proofs in Michael Rozenberg's answer:
- Show: $lnxleqfrac2(x-1)1+x$
We have $ln(1+y)leqfrac2y2+y$ for $-1<y<0$ (see e.g. in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_logarithmic_identities#Inequalities),
i.e. $ln(x)leqfrac2(x-1)1+x$ for $0<x<1$. This is exactly what needs to be shown.
- Show: $ln(1+x)leqfracx(2x+1)(1+x)^2$
We have $ln(1+x)leqfracxsqrt1+x$ (see e.g. in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_logarithmic_identities#Inequalities), so we may prove
$frac1sqrt1+xleqfrac2x+1(1+x)^2$ or $(1+x)^3-(1+2x)^2leq 0$ or $x^2 - x - 1<0$ or $x( 1-x) + 1>0$ which is true since $1-x ge 0$.
Sorry @Andreas , I have made a mistake. $g'(x)$ should be $g'(x)=frac1x^2left(fracx1+x-log (1+x)right)+log left(1+frac1xright)-frac11+x.$
â Riemann
Sep 7 at 13:11
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Michael Rozenberg's answer has it all.
Here are two remaining proofs in Michael Rozenberg's answer:
- Show: $lnxleqfrac2(x-1)1+x$
We have $ln(1+y)leqfrac2y2+y$ for $-1<y<0$ (see e.g. in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_logarithmic_identities#Inequalities),
i.e. $ln(x)leqfrac2(x-1)1+x$ for $0<x<1$. This is exactly what needs to be shown.
- Show: $ln(1+x)leqfracx(2x+1)(1+x)^2$
We have $ln(1+x)leqfracxsqrt1+x$ (see e.g. in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_logarithmic_identities#Inequalities), so we may prove
$frac1sqrt1+xleqfrac2x+1(1+x)^2$ or $(1+x)^3-(1+2x)^2leq 0$ or $x^2 - x - 1<0$ or $x( 1-x) + 1>0$ which is true since $1-x ge 0$.
Michael Rozenberg's answer has it all.
Here are two remaining proofs in Michael Rozenberg's answer:
- Show: $lnxleqfrac2(x-1)1+x$
We have $ln(1+y)leqfrac2y2+y$ for $-1<y<0$ (see e.g. in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_logarithmic_identities#Inequalities),
i.e. $ln(x)leqfrac2(x-1)1+x$ for $0<x<1$. This is exactly what needs to be shown.
- Show: $ln(1+x)leqfracx(2x+1)(1+x)^2$
We have $ln(1+x)leqfracxsqrt1+x$ (see e.g. in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_logarithmic_identities#Inequalities), so we may prove
$frac1sqrt1+xleqfrac2x+1(1+x)^2$ or $(1+x)^3-(1+2x)^2leq 0$ or $x^2 - x - 1<0$ or $x( 1-x) + 1>0$ which is true since $1-x ge 0$.
edited Sep 8 at 10:08
answered Sep 7 at 12:57
Andreas
6,9901036
6,9901036
Sorry @Andreas , I have made a mistake. $g'(x)$ should be $g'(x)=frac1x^2left(fracx1+x-log (1+x)right)+log left(1+frac1xright)-frac11+x.$
â Riemann
Sep 7 at 13:11
add a comment |Â
Sorry @Andreas , I have made a mistake. $g'(x)$ should be $g'(x)=frac1x^2left(fracx1+x-log (1+x)right)+log left(1+frac1xright)-frac11+x.$
â Riemann
Sep 7 at 13:11
Sorry @Andreas , I have made a mistake. $g'(x)$ should be $g'(x)=frac1x^2left(fracx1+x-log (1+x)right)+log left(1+frac1xright)-frac11+x.$
â Riemann
Sep 7 at 13:11
Sorry @Andreas , I have made a mistake. $g'(x)$ should be $g'(x)=frac1x^2left(fracx1+x-log (1+x)right)+log left(1+frac1xright)-frac11+x.$
â Riemann
Sep 7 at 13:11
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Using
$$dfracxx+1<xlnleft(1+dfrac1xright)<1$$
and for $xtodfrac1x$
$$dfrac1x+1<dfrac1xlnleft(1+xright)<1$$
then
$$dfrac1xlnleft(1+xright)+xlnleft(1+dfrac1xright)>1$$
You trick is very nice.Can you give some help for the fonotonicity of the function $f(x)$.Thank you !
â Riemann
Sep 7 at 14:37
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Using
$$dfracxx+1<xlnleft(1+dfrac1xright)<1$$
and for $xtodfrac1x$
$$dfrac1x+1<dfrac1xlnleft(1+xright)<1$$
then
$$dfrac1xlnleft(1+xright)+xlnleft(1+dfrac1xright)>1$$
You trick is very nice.Can you give some help for the fonotonicity of the function $f(x)$.Thank you !
â Riemann
Sep 7 at 14:37
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Using
$$dfracxx+1<xlnleft(1+dfrac1xright)<1$$
and for $xtodfrac1x$
$$dfrac1x+1<dfrac1xlnleft(1+xright)<1$$
then
$$dfrac1xlnleft(1+xright)+xlnleft(1+dfrac1xright)>1$$
Using
$$dfracxx+1<xlnleft(1+dfrac1xright)<1$$
and for $xtodfrac1x$
$$dfrac1x+1<dfrac1xlnleft(1+xright)<1$$
then
$$dfrac1xlnleft(1+xright)+xlnleft(1+dfrac1xright)>1$$
answered Sep 7 at 14:29
Nosrati
22.7k61748
22.7k61748
You trick is very nice.Can you give some help for the fonotonicity of the function $f(x)$.Thank you !
â Riemann
Sep 7 at 14:37
add a comment |Â
You trick is very nice.Can you give some help for the fonotonicity of the function $f(x)$.Thank you !
â Riemann
Sep 7 at 14:37
You trick is very nice.Can you give some help for the fonotonicity of the function $f(x)$.Thank you !
â Riemann
Sep 7 at 14:37
You trick is very nice.Can you give some help for the fonotonicity of the function $f(x)$.Thank you !
â Riemann
Sep 7 at 14:37
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2908549%2fmonotonicity-of-the-function-1x-frac1x-left1-frac1x-rightx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
I believe that the solution to this problem is to use the symmetry of function $f(x)$. The symmetry is $f(x)=f(1/x)$.
â MathOverview
Sep 7 at 12:11
Just an observation: If you manage to at least show that $f'(x) not= 0$ for all $x in (0,1]$, then you are done because $lim_x to 0^+ f(x) = e < 4 = f(1),$ so there is no other option for $f$ other than to be strictly increasing on $(0, 1]$.
â Sobi
Sep 7 at 12:15
Is this related to math.stackexchange.com/q/2899031/42969, or is the resemblance coincidental?
â Martin R
Sep 7 at 12:22
@ Martin Rï¼ thank you for your hint of math.stackexchange.com/q/2899031/42969 Actually, the question I asked is confused me for several weeks, and I have seen math.stackexchange.com/q/2899031/42969 before, and then there is only one answers. And now I see there are several answers. And one answer use the result I have posted. It is resemblance coincidental.
â Riemann
Sep 7 at 12:26