The solutions of the inequality $[x^2]+5[x]+6>2$?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2












I tried to solve this inequality by taking the square outside the floor function $[y]$ (greatest integer less than $y$)but it was wrong since if $x=2.5$ then $[x]= 2$ and $x^2=4$ while $[x^2]=[6.25]=6$.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 2




    write $n = [x]$ and $[x^2] = n^2 + c$. Solve the problem as if its a quadratic in $n$, with answer depending on $c$. This gives you the range of values that $x$ can take
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 7 at 7:44











  • I think there are negative values for $x$.
    – mrs
    Sep 7 at 7:54










  • What operation is your $[cdot]$?
    – mvw
    Sep 7 at 8:01










  • Oviously the roots are negative but what are they?
    – priyanka kumari
    Sep 7 at 8:19










  • Did you try Calvin's method? When you take $[x]$ as $n$ and $[x^2]$ as $n^2$ and solve it as quadratic equation you'll get $n$ varying from $(-4-c)$ to $(-9-c)$. So, for the equation to be true your $n$ needs to be at least greater than $-4$.
    – Iti Shree
    Sep 7 at 9:36















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2












I tried to solve this inequality by taking the square outside the floor function $[y]$ (greatest integer less than $y$)but it was wrong since if $x=2.5$ then $[x]= 2$ and $x^2=4$ while $[x^2]=[6.25]=6$.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 2




    write $n = [x]$ and $[x^2] = n^2 + c$. Solve the problem as if its a quadratic in $n$, with answer depending on $c$. This gives you the range of values that $x$ can take
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 7 at 7:44











  • I think there are negative values for $x$.
    – mrs
    Sep 7 at 7:54










  • What operation is your $[cdot]$?
    – mvw
    Sep 7 at 8:01










  • Oviously the roots are negative but what are they?
    – priyanka kumari
    Sep 7 at 8:19










  • Did you try Calvin's method? When you take $[x]$ as $n$ and $[x^2]$ as $n^2$ and solve it as quadratic equation you'll get $n$ varying from $(-4-c)$ to $(-9-c)$. So, for the equation to be true your $n$ needs to be at least greater than $-4$.
    – Iti Shree
    Sep 7 at 9:36













up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2






2





I tried to solve this inequality by taking the square outside the floor function $[y]$ (greatest integer less than $y$)but it was wrong since if $x=2.5$ then $[x]= 2$ and $x^2=4$ while $[x^2]=[6.25]=6$.










share|cite|improve this question















I tried to solve this inequality by taking the square outside the floor function $[y]$ (greatest integer less than $y$)but it was wrong since if $x=2.5$ then $[x]= 2$ and $x^2=4$ while $[x^2]=[6.25]=6$.







calculus functions inequality quadratics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Sep 7 at 13:26









Calvin Khor

8,85621133




8,85621133










asked Sep 7 at 7:36









priyanka kumari

415




415







  • 2




    write $n = [x]$ and $[x^2] = n^2 + c$. Solve the problem as if its a quadratic in $n$, with answer depending on $c$. This gives you the range of values that $x$ can take
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 7 at 7:44











  • I think there are negative values for $x$.
    – mrs
    Sep 7 at 7:54










  • What operation is your $[cdot]$?
    – mvw
    Sep 7 at 8:01










  • Oviously the roots are negative but what are they?
    – priyanka kumari
    Sep 7 at 8:19










  • Did you try Calvin's method? When you take $[x]$ as $n$ and $[x^2]$ as $n^2$ and solve it as quadratic equation you'll get $n$ varying from $(-4-c)$ to $(-9-c)$. So, for the equation to be true your $n$ needs to be at least greater than $-4$.
    – Iti Shree
    Sep 7 at 9:36













  • 2




    write $n = [x]$ and $[x^2] = n^2 + c$. Solve the problem as if its a quadratic in $n$, with answer depending on $c$. This gives you the range of values that $x$ can take
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 7 at 7:44











  • I think there are negative values for $x$.
    – mrs
    Sep 7 at 7:54










  • What operation is your $[cdot]$?
    – mvw
    Sep 7 at 8:01










  • Oviously the roots are negative but what are they?
    – priyanka kumari
    Sep 7 at 8:19










  • Did you try Calvin's method? When you take $[x]$ as $n$ and $[x^2]$ as $n^2$ and solve it as quadratic equation you'll get $n$ varying from $(-4-c)$ to $(-9-c)$. So, for the equation to be true your $n$ needs to be at least greater than $-4$.
    – Iti Shree
    Sep 7 at 9:36








2




2




write $n = [x]$ and $[x^2] = n^2 + c$. Solve the problem as if its a quadratic in $n$, with answer depending on $c$. This gives you the range of values that $x$ can take
– Calvin Khor
Sep 7 at 7:44





write $n = [x]$ and $[x^2] = n^2 + c$. Solve the problem as if its a quadratic in $n$, with answer depending on $c$. This gives you the range of values that $x$ can take
– Calvin Khor
Sep 7 at 7:44













I think there are negative values for $x$.
– mrs
Sep 7 at 7:54




I think there are negative values for $x$.
– mrs
Sep 7 at 7:54












What operation is your $[cdot]$?
– mvw
Sep 7 at 8:01




What operation is your $[cdot]$?
– mvw
Sep 7 at 8:01












Oviously the roots are negative but what are they?
– priyanka kumari
Sep 7 at 8:19




Oviously the roots are negative but what are they?
– priyanka kumari
Sep 7 at 8:19












Did you try Calvin's method? When you take $[x]$ as $n$ and $[x^2]$ as $n^2$ and solve it as quadratic equation you'll get $n$ varying from $(-4-c)$ to $(-9-c)$. So, for the equation to be true your $n$ needs to be at least greater than $-4$.
– Iti Shree
Sep 7 at 9:36





Did you try Calvin's method? When you take $[x]$ as $n$ and $[x^2]$ as $n^2$ and solve it as quadratic equation you'll get $n$ varying from $(-4-c)$ to $(-9-c)$. So, for the equation to be true your $n$ needs to be at least greater than $-4$.
– Iti Shree
Sep 7 at 9:36











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










We can you Calvin's suggested method here (see his comment) by solving the equation as we would with the quadratic equation.
You solve this equation as following, let us take $[x]$ another variable say $n$, and $[x^2]$ as $n^2 + c$. Now your equation becomes :



$$n^2 + c + 5n + 6 = 2$$
$$n (n + 5) = -4 - c$$



Now, we know from above equation that,
n varies from , $$ n = -4 -c$$
to $$ n = -9 - c$$



here, for our required equation to be true, the equation should be strictly greater than $2$. Hence, the least possible value for $x$ in greatest integer function should be greater than $-4$.



I hope this clears your doubt.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Please tell me about Calvin method
    – priyanka kumari
    Sep 7 at 11:22










  • I used the same thing he mentioned in the comment.
    – Iti Shree
    Sep 7 at 11:49










  • If you make a graph of the function there should be 3 regions. One is the one you found, one more is for X sufficiently large and negative, and one more comes from a careful study of the term $c$
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 7 at 13:15










  • You can try to write $[x]+d = x $ so that $n^2 +2dn+d^2=x^2 $ ie $c=[2dn+d^2], where d is any number in $[0,1)$. Some case analysis will be needed...
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 7 at 13:37










  • Actually it doesn't seem that any of the boundaries of the regions is -4...sorry
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 7 at 13:40

















up vote
1
down vote













Define $f(x)=operatornamefloorleft(x^2right)+5operatornamefloorleft(xright)+6 = [x^2] + 5[x] + 6$.



I'll present some graphs that indicate the solution set is more complicated than $xge -4$.



(Desmos link)graph



We see the solution is made up of 3 different regions. As you can see Desmos is not certain about the accuracy of its plot so I found a second opinion that indeed indicates that there is a small hole in the solution regions a small bit to the left of $-5$ (W|A link),



enter image description here



I don't understand where $-4$ came from. Firstly, it does not come from the other potential interpretation of $[cdot]$ as the ceiling function, as these calculations in W|A show. Secondly, under the interpretation $[x] = operatornamefloor(x)$, we have $f(-2)=0$.



Clearly, even without a graph, there are at least two distinct regions that satisfy the inequality, since if $x>0$, then



$$ fleft(xright)=[x^2] + 5[x]+6 > 6 > 2$$
and if $x < -6 $ then
$$ [x^2] + 5[x]+6 ≥ (x^2-1) + 5(x-1) + 6 = underbracex(x+5)_>6 > 2 $$
so the solution region must contain
$$ x < -6 cup x > 0$$
as a subset. The fact that there is a third region is not so obvious and requires more careful study of the difference between $[x^2]$ and $x^2$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • I think you are copied the wrong question.
    – priyanka kumari
    Sep 8 at 10:19










  • @user584880 please explain?
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 8 at 10:20










  • It was$$[x^2]+5[x]+6>2$$
    – priyanka kumari
    Sep 8 at 10:22











  • @user584880 what did I use instead? Looks the same to me?
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 8 at 10:35










  • @user584880 I made a large number of claims. If you could point out one that isn't right, I would appreciate it greatly. In addition, I have provided a number of graphs, and you can change the inputs. If you could provide me with a graph / link that has the 'correct' function, that would be great.
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 8 at 14:55

















up vote
1
down vote













I think the answer should be: $xle-sqrt27qquad $ or $qquad -5lexle-sqrt22qquad $
or
$qquad 0lexqquad $
Here is a sketch:



For $$-4lexle-1$$ it is $$x^2+5x+4le0$$ or $$x^2+5xle-4$$, but also
$$ [x^2]+5[x]lex^2+5x$$
so there is no solution in $[-4, -1]$.



For $$-5lexlt-4$$ it is $qquad [x]=-5qquad $ and so $qquad 5[x]=-25qquad $ therefor $qquad [x^2]-25gt-4qquad $ $iff$ $qquad [x^2]geqslant22qquad $ $iff$ $qquad x^2geqslant22qquad $ $implies$ $qquad xle-sqrt22qquad $






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • How did you obtain this answer?
    – Atrey Desai
    Sep 8 at 18:49










  • For $x$ non negative or smaller than $-6$ is rather obvious. Then I checked the values in the interval $[-6, 0]$
    – dmtri
    Sep 8 at 18:52






  • 1




    this matches my graph :)
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 9 at 3:36










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2908361%2fthe-solutions-of-the-inequality-x25x62%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
0
down vote



accepted










We can you Calvin's suggested method here (see his comment) by solving the equation as we would with the quadratic equation.
You solve this equation as following, let us take $[x]$ another variable say $n$, and $[x^2]$ as $n^2 + c$. Now your equation becomes :



$$n^2 + c + 5n + 6 = 2$$
$$n (n + 5) = -4 - c$$



Now, we know from above equation that,
n varies from , $$ n = -4 -c$$
to $$ n = -9 - c$$



here, for our required equation to be true, the equation should be strictly greater than $2$. Hence, the least possible value for $x$ in greatest integer function should be greater than $-4$.



I hope this clears your doubt.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Please tell me about Calvin method
    – priyanka kumari
    Sep 7 at 11:22










  • I used the same thing he mentioned in the comment.
    – Iti Shree
    Sep 7 at 11:49










  • If you make a graph of the function there should be 3 regions. One is the one you found, one more is for X sufficiently large and negative, and one more comes from a careful study of the term $c$
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 7 at 13:15










  • You can try to write $[x]+d = x $ so that $n^2 +2dn+d^2=x^2 $ ie $c=[2dn+d^2], where d is any number in $[0,1)$. Some case analysis will be needed...
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 7 at 13:37










  • Actually it doesn't seem that any of the boundaries of the regions is -4...sorry
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 7 at 13:40














up vote
0
down vote



accepted










We can you Calvin's suggested method here (see his comment) by solving the equation as we would with the quadratic equation.
You solve this equation as following, let us take $[x]$ another variable say $n$, and $[x^2]$ as $n^2 + c$. Now your equation becomes :



$$n^2 + c + 5n + 6 = 2$$
$$n (n + 5) = -4 - c$$



Now, we know from above equation that,
n varies from , $$ n = -4 -c$$
to $$ n = -9 - c$$



here, for our required equation to be true, the equation should be strictly greater than $2$. Hence, the least possible value for $x$ in greatest integer function should be greater than $-4$.



I hope this clears your doubt.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Please tell me about Calvin method
    – priyanka kumari
    Sep 7 at 11:22










  • I used the same thing he mentioned in the comment.
    – Iti Shree
    Sep 7 at 11:49










  • If you make a graph of the function there should be 3 regions. One is the one you found, one more is for X sufficiently large and negative, and one more comes from a careful study of the term $c$
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 7 at 13:15










  • You can try to write $[x]+d = x $ so that $n^2 +2dn+d^2=x^2 $ ie $c=[2dn+d^2], where d is any number in $[0,1)$. Some case analysis will be needed...
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 7 at 13:37










  • Actually it doesn't seem that any of the boundaries of the regions is -4...sorry
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 7 at 13:40












up vote
0
down vote



accepted







up vote
0
down vote



accepted






We can you Calvin's suggested method here (see his comment) by solving the equation as we would with the quadratic equation.
You solve this equation as following, let us take $[x]$ another variable say $n$, and $[x^2]$ as $n^2 + c$. Now your equation becomes :



$$n^2 + c + 5n + 6 = 2$$
$$n (n + 5) = -4 - c$$



Now, we know from above equation that,
n varies from , $$ n = -4 -c$$
to $$ n = -9 - c$$



here, for our required equation to be true, the equation should be strictly greater than $2$. Hence, the least possible value for $x$ in greatest integer function should be greater than $-4$.



I hope this clears your doubt.






share|cite|improve this answer












We can you Calvin's suggested method here (see his comment) by solving the equation as we would with the quadratic equation.
You solve this equation as following, let us take $[x]$ another variable say $n$, and $[x^2]$ as $n^2 + c$. Now your equation becomes :



$$n^2 + c + 5n + 6 = 2$$
$$n (n + 5) = -4 - c$$



Now, we know from above equation that,
n varies from , $$ n = -4 -c$$
to $$ n = -9 - c$$



here, for our required equation to be true, the equation should be strictly greater than $2$. Hence, the least possible value for $x$ in greatest integer function should be greater than $-4$.



I hope this clears your doubt.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Sep 7 at 11:20









Iti Shree

938216




938216











  • Please tell me about Calvin method
    – priyanka kumari
    Sep 7 at 11:22










  • I used the same thing he mentioned in the comment.
    – Iti Shree
    Sep 7 at 11:49










  • If you make a graph of the function there should be 3 regions. One is the one you found, one more is for X sufficiently large and negative, and one more comes from a careful study of the term $c$
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 7 at 13:15










  • You can try to write $[x]+d = x $ so that $n^2 +2dn+d^2=x^2 $ ie $c=[2dn+d^2], where d is any number in $[0,1)$. Some case analysis will be needed...
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 7 at 13:37










  • Actually it doesn't seem that any of the boundaries of the regions is -4...sorry
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 7 at 13:40
















  • Please tell me about Calvin method
    – priyanka kumari
    Sep 7 at 11:22










  • I used the same thing he mentioned in the comment.
    – Iti Shree
    Sep 7 at 11:49










  • If you make a graph of the function there should be 3 regions. One is the one you found, one more is for X sufficiently large and negative, and one more comes from a careful study of the term $c$
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 7 at 13:15










  • You can try to write $[x]+d = x $ so that $n^2 +2dn+d^2=x^2 $ ie $c=[2dn+d^2], where d is any number in $[0,1)$. Some case analysis will be needed...
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 7 at 13:37










  • Actually it doesn't seem that any of the boundaries of the regions is -4...sorry
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 7 at 13:40















Please tell me about Calvin method
– priyanka kumari
Sep 7 at 11:22




Please tell me about Calvin method
– priyanka kumari
Sep 7 at 11:22












I used the same thing he mentioned in the comment.
– Iti Shree
Sep 7 at 11:49




I used the same thing he mentioned in the comment.
– Iti Shree
Sep 7 at 11:49












If you make a graph of the function there should be 3 regions. One is the one you found, one more is for X sufficiently large and negative, and one more comes from a careful study of the term $c$
– Calvin Khor
Sep 7 at 13:15




If you make a graph of the function there should be 3 regions. One is the one you found, one more is for X sufficiently large and negative, and one more comes from a careful study of the term $c$
– Calvin Khor
Sep 7 at 13:15












You can try to write $[x]+d = x $ so that $n^2 +2dn+d^2=x^2 $ ie $c=[2dn+d^2], where d is any number in $[0,1)$. Some case analysis will be needed...
– Calvin Khor
Sep 7 at 13:37




You can try to write $[x]+d = x $ so that $n^2 +2dn+d^2=x^2 $ ie $c=[2dn+d^2], where d is any number in $[0,1)$. Some case analysis will be needed...
– Calvin Khor
Sep 7 at 13:37












Actually it doesn't seem that any of the boundaries of the regions is -4...sorry
– Calvin Khor
Sep 7 at 13:40




Actually it doesn't seem that any of the boundaries of the regions is -4...sorry
– Calvin Khor
Sep 7 at 13:40










up vote
1
down vote













Define $f(x)=operatornamefloorleft(x^2right)+5operatornamefloorleft(xright)+6 = [x^2] + 5[x] + 6$.



I'll present some graphs that indicate the solution set is more complicated than $xge -4$.



(Desmos link)graph



We see the solution is made up of 3 different regions. As you can see Desmos is not certain about the accuracy of its plot so I found a second opinion that indeed indicates that there is a small hole in the solution regions a small bit to the left of $-5$ (W|A link),



enter image description here



I don't understand where $-4$ came from. Firstly, it does not come from the other potential interpretation of $[cdot]$ as the ceiling function, as these calculations in W|A show. Secondly, under the interpretation $[x] = operatornamefloor(x)$, we have $f(-2)=0$.



Clearly, even without a graph, there are at least two distinct regions that satisfy the inequality, since if $x>0$, then



$$ fleft(xright)=[x^2] + 5[x]+6 > 6 > 2$$
and if $x < -6 $ then
$$ [x^2] + 5[x]+6 ≥ (x^2-1) + 5(x-1) + 6 = underbracex(x+5)_>6 > 2 $$
so the solution region must contain
$$ x < -6 cup x > 0$$
as a subset. The fact that there is a third region is not so obvious and requires more careful study of the difference between $[x^2]$ and $x^2$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • I think you are copied the wrong question.
    – priyanka kumari
    Sep 8 at 10:19










  • @user584880 please explain?
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 8 at 10:20










  • It was$$[x^2]+5[x]+6>2$$
    – priyanka kumari
    Sep 8 at 10:22











  • @user584880 what did I use instead? Looks the same to me?
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 8 at 10:35










  • @user584880 I made a large number of claims. If you could point out one that isn't right, I would appreciate it greatly. In addition, I have provided a number of graphs, and you can change the inputs. If you could provide me with a graph / link that has the 'correct' function, that would be great.
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 8 at 14:55














up vote
1
down vote













Define $f(x)=operatornamefloorleft(x^2right)+5operatornamefloorleft(xright)+6 = [x^2] + 5[x] + 6$.



I'll present some graphs that indicate the solution set is more complicated than $xge -4$.



(Desmos link)graph



We see the solution is made up of 3 different regions. As you can see Desmos is not certain about the accuracy of its plot so I found a second opinion that indeed indicates that there is a small hole in the solution regions a small bit to the left of $-5$ (W|A link),



enter image description here



I don't understand where $-4$ came from. Firstly, it does not come from the other potential interpretation of $[cdot]$ as the ceiling function, as these calculations in W|A show. Secondly, under the interpretation $[x] = operatornamefloor(x)$, we have $f(-2)=0$.



Clearly, even without a graph, there are at least two distinct regions that satisfy the inequality, since if $x>0$, then



$$ fleft(xright)=[x^2] + 5[x]+6 > 6 > 2$$
and if $x < -6 $ then
$$ [x^2] + 5[x]+6 ≥ (x^2-1) + 5(x-1) + 6 = underbracex(x+5)_>6 > 2 $$
so the solution region must contain
$$ x < -6 cup x > 0$$
as a subset. The fact that there is a third region is not so obvious and requires more careful study of the difference between $[x^2]$ and $x^2$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • I think you are copied the wrong question.
    – priyanka kumari
    Sep 8 at 10:19










  • @user584880 please explain?
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 8 at 10:20










  • It was$$[x^2]+5[x]+6>2$$
    – priyanka kumari
    Sep 8 at 10:22











  • @user584880 what did I use instead? Looks the same to me?
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 8 at 10:35










  • @user584880 I made a large number of claims. If you could point out one that isn't right, I would appreciate it greatly. In addition, I have provided a number of graphs, and you can change the inputs. If you could provide me with a graph / link that has the 'correct' function, that would be great.
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 8 at 14:55












up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









Define $f(x)=operatornamefloorleft(x^2right)+5operatornamefloorleft(xright)+6 = [x^2] + 5[x] + 6$.



I'll present some graphs that indicate the solution set is more complicated than $xge -4$.



(Desmos link)graph



We see the solution is made up of 3 different regions. As you can see Desmos is not certain about the accuracy of its plot so I found a second opinion that indeed indicates that there is a small hole in the solution regions a small bit to the left of $-5$ (W|A link),



enter image description here



I don't understand where $-4$ came from. Firstly, it does not come from the other potential interpretation of $[cdot]$ as the ceiling function, as these calculations in W|A show. Secondly, under the interpretation $[x] = operatornamefloor(x)$, we have $f(-2)=0$.



Clearly, even without a graph, there are at least two distinct regions that satisfy the inequality, since if $x>0$, then



$$ fleft(xright)=[x^2] + 5[x]+6 > 6 > 2$$
and if $x < -6 $ then
$$ [x^2] + 5[x]+6 ≥ (x^2-1) + 5(x-1) + 6 = underbracex(x+5)_>6 > 2 $$
so the solution region must contain
$$ x < -6 cup x > 0$$
as a subset. The fact that there is a third region is not so obvious and requires more careful study of the difference between $[x^2]$ and $x^2$.






share|cite|improve this answer












Define $f(x)=operatornamefloorleft(x^2right)+5operatornamefloorleft(xright)+6 = [x^2] + 5[x] + 6$.



I'll present some graphs that indicate the solution set is more complicated than $xge -4$.



(Desmos link)graph



We see the solution is made up of 3 different regions. As you can see Desmos is not certain about the accuracy of its plot so I found a second opinion that indeed indicates that there is a small hole in the solution regions a small bit to the left of $-5$ (W|A link),



enter image description here



I don't understand where $-4$ came from. Firstly, it does not come from the other potential interpretation of $[cdot]$ as the ceiling function, as these calculations in W|A show. Secondly, under the interpretation $[x] = operatornamefloor(x)$, we have $f(-2)=0$.



Clearly, even without a graph, there are at least two distinct regions that satisfy the inequality, since if $x>0$, then



$$ fleft(xright)=[x^2] + 5[x]+6 > 6 > 2$$
and if $x < -6 $ then
$$ [x^2] + 5[x]+6 ≥ (x^2-1) + 5(x-1) + 6 = underbracex(x+5)_>6 > 2 $$
so the solution region must contain
$$ x < -6 cup x > 0$$
as a subset. The fact that there is a third region is not so obvious and requires more careful study of the difference between $[x^2]$ and $x^2$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Sep 8 at 9:53









Calvin Khor

8,85621133




8,85621133











  • I think you are copied the wrong question.
    – priyanka kumari
    Sep 8 at 10:19










  • @user584880 please explain?
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 8 at 10:20










  • It was$$[x^2]+5[x]+6>2$$
    – priyanka kumari
    Sep 8 at 10:22











  • @user584880 what did I use instead? Looks the same to me?
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 8 at 10:35










  • @user584880 I made a large number of claims. If you could point out one that isn't right, I would appreciate it greatly. In addition, I have provided a number of graphs, and you can change the inputs. If you could provide me with a graph / link that has the 'correct' function, that would be great.
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 8 at 14:55
















  • I think you are copied the wrong question.
    – priyanka kumari
    Sep 8 at 10:19










  • @user584880 please explain?
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 8 at 10:20










  • It was$$[x^2]+5[x]+6>2$$
    – priyanka kumari
    Sep 8 at 10:22











  • @user584880 what did I use instead? Looks the same to me?
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 8 at 10:35










  • @user584880 I made a large number of claims. If you could point out one that isn't right, I would appreciate it greatly. In addition, I have provided a number of graphs, and you can change the inputs. If you could provide me with a graph / link that has the 'correct' function, that would be great.
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 8 at 14:55















I think you are copied the wrong question.
– priyanka kumari
Sep 8 at 10:19




I think you are copied the wrong question.
– priyanka kumari
Sep 8 at 10:19












@user584880 please explain?
– Calvin Khor
Sep 8 at 10:20




@user584880 please explain?
– Calvin Khor
Sep 8 at 10:20












It was$$[x^2]+5[x]+6>2$$
– priyanka kumari
Sep 8 at 10:22





It was$$[x^2]+5[x]+6>2$$
– priyanka kumari
Sep 8 at 10:22













@user584880 what did I use instead? Looks the same to me?
– Calvin Khor
Sep 8 at 10:35




@user584880 what did I use instead? Looks the same to me?
– Calvin Khor
Sep 8 at 10:35












@user584880 I made a large number of claims. If you could point out one that isn't right, I would appreciate it greatly. In addition, I have provided a number of graphs, and you can change the inputs. If you could provide me with a graph / link that has the 'correct' function, that would be great.
– Calvin Khor
Sep 8 at 14:55




@user584880 I made a large number of claims. If you could point out one that isn't right, I would appreciate it greatly. In addition, I have provided a number of graphs, and you can change the inputs. If you could provide me with a graph / link that has the 'correct' function, that would be great.
– Calvin Khor
Sep 8 at 14:55










up vote
1
down vote













I think the answer should be: $xle-sqrt27qquad $ or $qquad -5lexle-sqrt22qquad $
or
$qquad 0lexqquad $
Here is a sketch:



For $$-4lexle-1$$ it is $$x^2+5x+4le0$$ or $$x^2+5xle-4$$, but also
$$ [x^2]+5[x]lex^2+5x$$
so there is no solution in $[-4, -1]$.



For $$-5lexlt-4$$ it is $qquad [x]=-5qquad $ and so $qquad 5[x]=-25qquad $ therefor $qquad [x^2]-25gt-4qquad $ $iff$ $qquad [x^2]geqslant22qquad $ $iff$ $qquad x^2geqslant22qquad $ $implies$ $qquad xle-sqrt22qquad $






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • How did you obtain this answer?
    – Atrey Desai
    Sep 8 at 18:49










  • For $x$ non negative or smaller than $-6$ is rather obvious. Then I checked the values in the interval $[-6, 0]$
    – dmtri
    Sep 8 at 18:52






  • 1




    this matches my graph :)
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 9 at 3:36














up vote
1
down vote













I think the answer should be: $xle-sqrt27qquad $ or $qquad -5lexle-sqrt22qquad $
or
$qquad 0lexqquad $
Here is a sketch:



For $$-4lexle-1$$ it is $$x^2+5x+4le0$$ or $$x^2+5xle-4$$, but also
$$ [x^2]+5[x]lex^2+5x$$
so there is no solution in $[-4, -1]$.



For $$-5lexlt-4$$ it is $qquad [x]=-5qquad $ and so $qquad 5[x]=-25qquad $ therefor $qquad [x^2]-25gt-4qquad $ $iff$ $qquad [x^2]geqslant22qquad $ $iff$ $qquad x^2geqslant22qquad $ $implies$ $qquad xle-sqrt22qquad $






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • How did you obtain this answer?
    – Atrey Desai
    Sep 8 at 18:49










  • For $x$ non negative or smaller than $-6$ is rather obvious. Then I checked the values in the interval $[-6, 0]$
    – dmtri
    Sep 8 at 18:52






  • 1




    this matches my graph :)
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 9 at 3:36












up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









I think the answer should be: $xle-sqrt27qquad $ or $qquad -5lexle-sqrt22qquad $
or
$qquad 0lexqquad $
Here is a sketch:



For $$-4lexle-1$$ it is $$x^2+5x+4le0$$ or $$x^2+5xle-4$$, but also
$$ [x^2]+5[x]lex^2+5x$$
so there is no solution in $[-4, -1]$.



For $$-5lexlt-4$$ it is $qquad [x]=-5qquad $ and so $qquad 5[x]=-25qquad $ therefor $qquad [x^2]-25gt-4qquad $ $iff$ $qquad [x^2]geqslant22qquad $ $iff$ $qquad x^2geqslant22qquad $ $implies$ $qquad xle-sqrt22qquad $






share|cite|improve this answer














I think the answer should be: $xle-sqrt27qquad $ or $qquad -5lexle-sqrt22qquad $
or
$qquad 0lexqquad $
Here is a sketch:



For $$-4lexle-1$$ it is $$x^2+5x+4le0$$ or $$x^2+5xle-4$$, but also
$$ [x^2]+5[x]lex^2+5x$$
so there is no solution in $[-4, -1]$.



For $$-5lexlt-4$$ it is $qquad [x]=-5qquad $ and so $qquad 5[x]=-25qquad $ therefor $qquad [x^2]-25gt-4qquad $ $iff$ $qquad [x^2]geqslant22qquad $ $iff$ $qquad x^2geqslant22qquad $ $implies$ $qquad xle-sqrt22qquad $







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Sep 9 at 4:52

























answered Sep 8 at 18:44









dmtri

952518




952518











  • How did you obtain this answer?
    – Atrey Desai
    Sep 8 at 18:49










  • For $x$ non negative or smaller than $-6$ is rather obvious. Then I checked the values in the interval $[-6, 0]$
    – dmtri
    Sep 8 at 18:52






  • 1




    this matches my graph :)
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 9 at 3:36
















  • How did you obtain this answer?
    – Atrey Desai
    Sep 8 at 18:49










  • For $x$ non negative or smaller than $-6$ is rather obvious. Then I checked the values in the interval $[-6, 0]$
    – dmtri
    Sep 8 at 18:52






  • 1




    this matches my graph :)
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 9 at 3:36















How did you obtain this answer?
– Atrey Desai
Sep 8 at 18:49




How did you obtain this answer?
– Atrey Desai
Sep 8 at 18:49












For $x$ non negative or smaller than $-6$ is rather obvious. Then I checked the values in the interval $[-6, 0]$
– dmtri
Sep 8 at 18:52




For $x$ non negative or smaller than $-6$ is rather obvious. Then I checked the values in the interval $[-6, 0]$
– dmtri
Sep 8 at 18:52




1




1




this matches my graph :)
– Calvin Khor
Sep 9 at 3:36




this matches my graph :)
– Calvin Khor
Sep 9 at 3:36

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2908361%2fthe-solutions-of-the-inequality-x25x62%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Carbon dioxide

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?