Let $f:[a,b]toBbbR$ be continuous. Does $maxf(x)$ exist?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Let $f:[a,b]toBbbR$ be continuous. Does beginalignmaxf(x) endalign exist?



MY WORK



I believe it does and I want to prove it.



Since $f:[a,b]toBbbR$ is continuous, then $f$ is uniformly continuous. Let $epsilon> 0$ be given, then $exists, delta>$ such that $forall x,yin [a,b]$ with $|x-y|<delta,$ it implies $|f(x)-f(y)|<epsilon.$



Then, for $aleq xleq b,$



beginalign f(x)=f(b)+[f(x)-f(b)]endalign
beginalign |f(x)|leq |f(b)|+|f(x)-f(b)|endalign
beginalign maxlimits_aleq xleq b|f(x)|leq |f(b)|+maxlimits_aleq xleq b|f(x)-f(b)|endalign



I am stuck at this point. Please, can anyone show me how to continue from here?










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 4




    The extreme value theorem seems help.
    – Yuta
    Sep 8 at 6:16







  • 1




    I'm surprised you know what uniform continuity is before covering the extreme value theorem, I've only ever seen it covered in the reverse order in books/lectures
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 8 at 6:21










  • @Calvin Khor: Anyway, you are right but I'm just solving some miscellaneous problems!
    – Micheal
    Sep 8 at 6:23










  • I think the absolute value is distracting you here. In fact, the statement is true for all continuous functions, not just absolute values of continuous functions.
    – Mark
    Sep 8 at 6:56














up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Let $f:[a,b]toBbbR$ be continuous. Does beginalignmaxf(x) endalign exist?



MY WORK



I believe it does and I want to prove it.



Since $f:[a,b]toBbbR$ is continuous, then $f$ is uniformly continuous. Let $epsilon> 0$ be given, then $exists, delta>$ such that $forall x,yin [a,b]$ with $|x-y|<delta,$ it implies $|f(x)-f(y)|<epsilon.$



Then, for $aleq xleq b,$



beginalign f(x)=f(b)+[f(x)-f(b)]endalign
beginalign |f(x)|leq |f(b)|+|f(x)-f(b)|endalign
beginalign maxlimits_aleq xleq b|f(x)|leq |f(b)|+maxlimits_aleq xleq b|f(x)-f(b)|endalign



I am stuck at this point. Please, can anyone show me how to continue from here?










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 4




    The extreme value theorem seems help.
    – Yuta
    Sep 8 at 6:16







  • 1




    I'm surprised you know what uniform continuity is before covering the extreme value theorem, I've only ever seen it covered in the reverse order in books/lectures
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 8 at 6:21










  • @Calvin Khor: Anyway, you are right but I'm just solving some miscellaneous problems!
    – Micheal
    Sep 8 at 6:23










  • I think the absolute value is distracting you here. In fact, the statement is true for all continuous functions, not just absolute values of continuous functions.
    – Mark
    Sep 8 at 6:56












up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











Let $f:[a,b]toBbbR$ be continuous. Does beginalignmaxf(x) endalign exist?



MY WORK



I believe it does and I want to prove it.



Since $f:[a,b]toBbbR$ is continuous, then $f$ is uniformly continuous. Let $epsilon> 0$ be given, then $exists, delta>$ such that $forall x,yin [a,b]$ with $|x-y|<delta,$ it implies $|f(x)-f(y)|<epsilon.$



Then, for $aleq xleq b,$



beginalign f(x)=f(b)+[f(x)-f(b)]endalign
beginalign |f(x)|leq |f(b)|+|f(x)-f(b)|endalign
beginalign maxlimits_aleq xleq b|f(x)|leq |f(b)|+maxlimits_aleq xleq b|f(x)-f(b)|endalign



I am stuck at this point. Please, can anyone show me how to continue from here?










share|cite|improve this question















Let $f:[a,b]toBbbR$ be continuous. Does beginalignmaxf(x) endalign exist?



MY WORK



I believe it does and I want to prove it.



Since $f:[a,b]toBbbR$ is continuous, then $f$ is uniformly continuous. Let $epsilon> 0$ be given, then $exists, delta>$ such that $forall x,yin [a,b]$ with $|x-y|<delta,$ it implies $|f(x)-f(y)|<epsilon.$



Then, for $aleq xleq b,$



beginalign f(x)=f(b)+[f(x)-f(b)]endalign
beginalign |f(x)|leq |f(b)|+|f(x)-f(b)|endalign
beginalign maxlimits_aleq xleq b|f(x)|leq |f(b)|+maxlimits_aleq xleq b|f(x)-f(b)|endalign



I am stuck at this point. Please, can anyone show me how to continue from here?







real-analysis analysis continuity uniform-continuity






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Sep 8 at 6:17

























asked Sep 8 at 6:12









Micheal

25010




25010







  • 4




    The extreme value theorem seems help.
    – Yuta
    Sep 8 at 6:16







  • 1




    I'm surprised you know what uniform continuity is before covering the extreme value theorem, I've only ever seen it covered in the reverse order in books/lectures
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 8 at 6:21










  • @Calvin Khor: Anyway, you are right but I'm just solving some miscellaneous problems!
    – Micheal
    Sep 8 at 6:23










  • I think the absolute value is distracting you here. In fact, the statement is true for all continuous functions, not just absolute values of continuous functions.
    – Mark
    Sep 8 at 6:56












  • 4




    The extreme value theorem seems help.
    – Yuta
    Sep 8 at 6:16







  • 1




    I'm surprised you know what uniform continuity is before covering the extreme value theorem, I've only ever seen it covered in the reverse order in books/lectures
    – Calvin Khor
    Sep 8 at 6:21










  • @Calvin Khor: Anyway, you are right but I'm just solving some miscellaneous problems!
    – Micheal
    Sep 8 at 6:23










  • I think the absolute value is distracting you here. In fact, the statement is true for all continuous functions, not just absolute values of continuous functions.
    – Mark
    Sep 8 at 6:56







4




4




The extreme value theorem seems help.
– Yuta
Sep 8 at 6:16





The extreme value theorem seems help.
– Yuta
Sep 8 at 6:16





1




1




I'm surprised you know what uniform continuity is before covering the extreme value theorem, I've only ever seen it covered in the reverse order in books/lectures
– Calvin Khor
Sep 8 at 6:21




I'm surprised you know what uniform continuity is before covering the extreme value theorem, I've only ever seen it covered in the reverse order in books/lectures
– Calvin Khor
Sep 8 at 6:21












@Calvin Khor: Anyway, you are right but I'm just solving some miscellaneous problems!
– Micheal
Sep 8 at 6:23




@Calvin Khor: Anyway, you are right but I'm just solving some miscellaneous problems!
– Micheal
Sep 8 at 6:23












I think the absolute value is distracting you here. In fact, the statement is true for all continuous functions, not just absolute values of continuous functions.
– Mark
Sep 8 at 6:56




I think the absolute value is distracting you here. In fact, the statement is true for all continuous functions, not just absolute values of continuous functions.
– Mark
Sep 8 at 6:56










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Because $[a,b]$ is compact, every sequence in $[a,b]$ has a subsequence that limits to a point in $[a,b]$. Pick a sequence $x_n in [a,b]$ such that $lim_n rightarrow infty |f(x_n)| = sup_[a,b]|f|$. Now get a convergent subsequence $x_n_k$ that converges to some $x in [a,b]$.



By continuity of $|f|$,



$|f(x)| = |f( lim_krightarrow inftyx_n_k)| = lim_krightarrow infty |f(x_n_k)| = lim_n rightarrow infty |f(x_n)| = sup_[a,b]|f|$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Thanks Mark. Never knew that I was supposed to use Baby Analysis!
    – Micheal
    Sep 8 at 7:11











  • It's a very great book :-p
    – Mark
    Sep 8 at 7:22

















up vote
2
down vote













Here's what I would do, in a proof sketch.



Claim: If $f:[a,b] rightarrow mathbbR$ is continuous, then $f([a,b])$ has a maximal element.



Proof Sketch: Since the set $[a,b] subset mathbbR$ is closed and bounded, by the Heine-Borel (or Bolzano-Weierstrass) Theorem it is compact. Since $f:[a,b] rightarrow mathbbR$ is continuous, it preserves compactness, so $f([a,b]) subset mathbbR$ is also compact. But since $f([a,b]) subseteq mathbbR$ is compact, again by Heine-Borel it is closed and bounded. Thus, we can construct a sequence of points converging to the supremum of $f([a,b])$, and since $f([a,b])$ is a closed set it must also contain the limit, which is precisely the maximal element of $f([a,b])$ we wanted.



If you have any questions about any of the arguments used in the Proof Sketch, do not hesitate to ask.



Regards!



-Dan






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Thanks! But how do I apply this in proving that $maxf(x)$ exists? I mean, absolute value!
    – Micheal
    Sep 8 at 6:48






  • 1




    @Michael: Define $g(x) = |f(x)|$. $g(x)$ is continuous on $[a, b]$ so just repeat the proof with $g$
    – Mark
    Sep 8 at 6:49

















up vote
2
down vote













you can prove in an another way




as $f:[a,,b] to Bbb R$ so $f([a,b])=[m,M]$ if $f(x) ge 0$ then its obvious that $beginalignmaxf(x) endalign$ exists. similarly if $f(x) le 0$ then $f([a,b])=[-m,-M]$ where $m,M ge 0$ then again $beginalignmaxf(x) endalign$ exists and $beginalignmaxf(x) endalign=m$.

in similar manner u can prove for when $f([a,b])=[-m,M]$ where $m,M ge 0$







share|cite|improve this answer


















  • 1




    The interval of definition is $[a,b]$. Why did you consider $[0,1]$?
    – Micheal
    Sep 8 at 6:42










  • its compact interval one u can take any arbitrary compact interval. i edited
    – sajan
    Sep 8 at 6:53










  • @Micheal define $g(x) = f(x/(b-a) + a)$. $g$ obtains a max in $[0,1]$ iff $f$ obtains a max in $[a,b]$
    – Mark
    Sep 8 at 6:53










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2909330%2flet-fa-b-to-bbbr-be-continuous-does-max-fxa-leq-x-leq-b-exist%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Because $[a,b]$ is compact, every sequence in $[a,b]$ has a subsequence that limits to a point in $[a,b]$. Pick a sequence $x_n in [a,b]$ such that $lim_n rightarrow infty |f(x_n)| = sup_[a,b]|f|$. Now get a convergent subsequence $x_n_k$ that converges to some $x in [a,b]$.



By continuity of $|f|$,



$|f(x)| = |f( lim_krightarrow inftyx_n_k)| = lim_krightarrow infty |f(x_n_k)| = lim_n rightarrow infty |f(x_n)| = sup_[a,b]|f|$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Thanks Mark. Never knew that I was supposed to use Baby Analysis!
    – Micheal
    Sep 8 at 7:11











  • It's a very great book :-p
    – Mark
    Sep 8 at 7:22














up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Because $[a,b]$ is compact, every sequence in $[a,b]$ has a subsequence that limits to a point in $[a,b]$. Pick a sequence $x_n in [a,b]$ such that $lim_n rightarrow infty |f(x_n)| = sup_[a,b]|f|$. Now get a convergent subsequence $x_n_k$ that converges to some $x in [a,b]$.



By continuity of $|f|$,



$|f(x)| = |f( lim_krightarrow inftyx_n_k)| = lim_krightarrow infty |f(x_n_k)| = lim_n rightarrow infty |f(x_n)| = sup_[a,b]|f|$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Thanks Mark. Never knew that I was supposed to use Baby Analysis!
    – Micheal
    Sep 8 at 7:11











  • It's a very great book :-p
    – Mark
    Sep 8 at 7:22












up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






Because $[a,b]$ is compact, every sequence in $[a,b]$ has a subsequence that limits to a point in $[a,b]$. Pick a sequence $x_n in [a,b]$ such that $lim_n rightarrow infty |f(x_n)| = sup_[a,b]|f|$. Now get a convergent subsequence $x_n_k$ that converges to some $x in [a,b]$.



By continuity of $|f|$,



$|f(x)| = |f( lim_krightarrow inftyx_n_k)| = lim_krightarrow infty |f(x_n_k)| = lim_n rightarrow infty |f(x_n)| = sup_[a,b]|f|$.






share|cite|improve this answer












Because $[a,b]$ is compact, every sequence in $[a,b]$ has a subsequence that limits to a point in $[a,b]$. Pick a sequence $x_n in [a,b]$ such that $lim_n rightarrow infty |f(x_n)| = sup_[a,b]|f|$. Now get a convergent subsequence $x_n_k$ that converges to some $x in [a,b]$.



By continuity of $|f|$,



$|f(x)| = |f( lim_krightarrow inftyx_n_k)| = lim_krightarrow infty |f(x_n_k)| = lim_n rightarrow infty |f(x_n)| = sup_[a,b]|f|$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Sep 8 at 7:03









Mark

1,84322247




1,84322247











  • Thanks Mark. Never knew that I was supposed to use Baby Analysis!
    – Micheal
    Sep 8 at 7:11











  • It's a very great book :-p
    – Mark
    Sep 8 at 7:22
















  • Thanks Mark. Never knew that I was supposed to use Baby Analysis!
    – Micheal
    Sep 8 at 7:11











  • It's a very great book :-p
    – Mark
    Sep 8 at 7:22















Thanks Mark. Never knew that I was supposed to use Baby Analysis!
– Micheal
Sep 8 at 7:11





Thanks Mark. Never knew that I was supposed to use Baby Analysis!
– Micheal
Sep 8 at 7:11













It's a very great book :-p
– Mark
Sep 8 at 7:22




It's a very great book :-p
– Mark
Sep 8 at 7:22










up vote
2
down vote













Here's what I would do, in a proof sketch.



Claim: If $f:[a,b] rightarrow mathbbR$ is continuous, then $f([a,b])$ has a maximal element.



Proof Sketch: Since the set $[a,b] subset mathbbR$ is closed and bounded, by the Heine-Borel (or Bolzano-Weierstrass) Theorem it is compact. Since $f:[a,b] rightarrow mathbbR$ is continuous, it preserves compactness, so $f([a,b]) subset mathbbR$ is also compact. But since $f([a,b]) subseteq mathbbR$ is compact, again by Heine-Borel it is closed and bounded. Thus, we can construct a sequence of points converging to the supremum of $f([a,b])$, and since $f([a,b])$ is a closed set it must also contain the limit, which is precisely the maximal element of $f([a,b])$ we wanted.



If you have any questions about any of the arguments used in the Proof Sketch, do not hesitate to ask.



Regards!



-Dan






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Thanks! But how do I apply this in proving that $maxf(x)$ exists? I mean, absolute value!
    – Micheal
    Sep 8 at 6:48






  • 1




    @Michael: Define $g(x) = |f(x)|$. $g(x)$ is continuous on $[a, b]$ so just repeat the proof with $g$
    – Mark
    Sep 8 at 6:49














up vote
2
down vote













Here's what I would do, in a proof sketch.



Claim: If $f:[a,b] rightarrow mathbbR$ is continuous, then $f([a,b])$ has a maximal element.



Proof Sketch: Since the set $[a,b] subset mathbbR$ is closed and bounded, by the Heine-Borel (or Bolzano-Weierstrass) Theorem it is compact. Since $f:[a,b] rightarrow mathbbR$ is continuous, it preserves compactness, so $f([a,b]) subset mathbbR$ is also compact. But since $f([a,b]) subseteq mathbbR$ is compact, again by Heine-Borel it is closed and bounded. Thus, we can construct a sequence of points converging to the supremum of $f([a,b])$, and since $f([a,b])$ is a closed set it must also contain the limit, which is precisely the maximal element of $f([a,b])$ we wanted.



If you have any questions about any of the arguments used in the Proof Sketch, do not hesitate to ask.



Regards!



-Dan






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Thanks! But how do I apply this in proving that $maxf(x)$ exists? I mean, absolute value!
    – Micheal
    Sep 8 at 6:48






  • 1




    @Michael: Define $g(x) = |f(x)|$. $g(x)$ is continuous on $[a, b]$ so just repeat the proof with $g$
    – Mark
    Sep 8 at 6:49












up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









Here's what I would do, in a proof sketch.



Claim: If $f:[a,b] rightarrow mathbbR$ is continuous, then $f([a,b])$ has a maximal element.



Proof Sketch: Since the set $[a,b] subset mathbbR$ is closed and bounded, by the Heine-Borel (or Bolzano-Weierstrass) Theorem it is compact. Since $f:[a,b] rightarrow mathbbR$ is continuous, it preserves compactness, so $f([a,b]) subset mathbbR$ is also compact. But since $f([a,b]) subseteq mathbbR$ is compact, again by Heine-Borel it is closed and bounded. Thus, we can construct a sequence of points converging to the supremum of $f([a,b])$, and since $f([a,b])$ is a closed set it must also contain the limit, which is precisely the maximal element of $f([a,b])$ we wanted.



If you have any questions about any of the arguments used in the Proof Sketch, do not hesitate to ask.



Regards!



-Dan






share|cite|improve this answer












Here's what I would do, in a proof sketch.



Claim: If $f:[a,b] rightarrow mathbbR$ is continuous, then $f([a,b])$ has a maximal element.



Proof Sketch: Since the set $[a,b] subset mathbbR$ is closed and bounded, by the Heine-Borel (or Bolzano-Weierstrass) Theorem it is compact. Since $f:[a,b] rightarrow mathbbR$ is continuous, it preserves compactness, so $f([a,b]) subset mathbbR$ is also compact. But since $f([a,b]) subseteq mathbbR$ is compact, again by Heine-Borel it is closed and bounded. Thus, we can construct a sequence of points converging to the supremum of $f([a,b])$, and since $f([a,b])$ is a closed set it must also contain the limit, which is precisely the maximal element of $f([a,b])$ we wanted.



If you have any questions about any of the arguments used in the Proof Sketch, do not hesitate to ask.



Regards!



-Dan







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Sep 8 at 6:36









Dan

564




564











  • Thanks! But how do I apply this in proving that $maxf(x)$ exists? I mean, absolute value!
    – Micheal
    Sep 8 at 6:48






  • 1




    @Michael: Define $g(x) = |f(x)|$. $g(x)$ is continuous on $[a, b]$ so just repeat the proof with $g$
    – Mark
    Sep 8 at 6:49
















  • Thanks! But how do I apply this in proving that $maxf(x)$ exists? I mean, absolute value!
    – Micheal
    Sep 8 at 6:48






  • 1




    @Michael: Define $g(x) = |f(x)|$. $g(x)$ is continuous on $[a, b]$ so just repeat the proof with $g$
    – Mark
    Sep 8 at 6:49















Thanks! But how do I apply this in proving that $maxf(x)$ exists? I mean, absolute value!
– Micheal
Sep 8 at 6:48




Thanks! But how do I apply this in proving that $maxf(x)$ exists? I mean, absolute value!
– Micheal
Sep 8 at 6:48




1




1




@Michael: Define $g(x) = |f(x)|$. $g(x)$ is continuous on $[a, b]$ so just repeat the proof with $g$
– Mark
Sep 8 at 6:49




@Michael: Define $g(x) = |f(x)|$. $g(x)$ is continuous on $[a, b]$ so just repeat the proof with $g$
– Mark
Sep 8 at 6:49










up vote
2
down vote













you can prove in an another way




as $f:[a,,b] to Bbb R$ so $f([a,b])=[m,M]$ if $f(x) ge 0$ then its obvious that $beginalignmaxf(x) endalign$ exists. similarly if $f(x) le 0$ then $f([a,b])=[-m,-M]$ where $m,M ge 0$ then again $beginalignmaxf(x) endalign$ exists and $beginalignmaxf(x) endalign=m$.

in similar manner u can prove for when $f([a,b])=[-m,M]$ where $m,M ge 0$







share|cite|improve this answer


















  • 1




    The interval of definition is $[a,b]$. Why did you consider $[0,1]$?
    – Micheal
    Sep 8 at 6:42










  • its compact interval one u can take any arbitrary compact interval. i edited
    – sajan
    Sep 8 at 6:53










  • @Micheal define $g(x) = f(x/(b-a) + a)$. $g$ obtains a max in $[0,1]$ iff $f$ obtains a max in $[a,b]$
    – Mark
    Sep 8 at 6:53














up vote
2
down vote













you can prove in an another way




as $f:[a,,b] to Bbb R$ so $f([a,b])=[m,M]$ if $f(x) ge 0$ then its obvious that $beginalignmaxf(x) endalign$ exists. similarly if $f(x) le 0$ then $f([a,b])=[-m,-M]$ where $m,M ge 0$ then again $beginalignmaxf(x) endalign$ exists and $beginalignmaxf(x) endalign=m$.

in similar manner u can prove for when $f([a,b])=[-m,M]$ where $m,M ge 0$







share|cite|improve this answer


















  • 1




    The interval of definition is $[a,b]$. Why did you consider $[0,1]$?
    – Micheal
    Sep 8 at 6:42










  • its compact interval one u can take any arbitrary compact interval. i edited
    – sajan
    Sep 8 at 6:53










  • @Micheal define $g(x) = f(x/(b-a) + a)$. $g$ obtains a max in $[0,1]$ iff $f$ obtains a max in $[a,b]$
    – Mark
    Sep 8 at 6:53












up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









you can prove in an another way




as $f:[a,,b] to Bbb R$ so $f([a,b])=[m,M]$ if $f(x) ge 0$ then its obvious that $beginalignmaxf(x) endalign$ exists. similarly if $f(x) le 0$ then $f([a,b])=[-m,-M]$ where $m,M ge 0$ then again $beginalignmaxf(x) endalign$ exists and $beginalignmaxf(x) endalign=m$.

in similar manner u can prove for when $f([a,b])=[-m,M]$ where $m,M ge 0$







share|cite|improve this answer














you can prove in an another way




as $f:[a,,b] to Bbb R$ so $f([a,b])=[m,M]$ if $f(x) ge 0$ then its obvious that $beginalignmaxf(x) endalign$ exists. similarly if $f(x) le 0$ then $f([a,b])=[-m,-M]$ where $m,M ge 0$ then again $beginalignmaxf(x) endalign$ exists and $beginalignmaxf(x) endalign=m$.

in similar manner u can prove for when $f([a,b])=[-m,M]$ where $m,M ge 0$








share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Sep 8 at 6:54

























answered Sep 8 at 6:40









sajan

1087




1087







  • 1




    The interval of definition is $[a,b]$. Why did you consider $[0,1]$?
    – Micheal
    Sep 8 at 6:42










  • its compact interval one u can take any arbitrary compact interval. i edited
    – sajan
    Sep 8 at 6:53










  • @Micheal define $g(x) = f(x/(b-a) + a)$. $g$ obtains a max in $[0,1]$ iff $f$ obtains a max in $[a,b]$
    – Mark
    Sep 8 at 6:53












  • 1




    The interval of definition is $[a,b]$. Why did you consider $[0,1]$?
    – Micheal
    Sep 8 at 6:42










  • its compact interval one u can take any arbitrary compact interval. i edited
    – sajan
    Sep 8 at 6:53










  • @Micheal define $g(x) = f(x/(b-a) + a)$. $g$ obtains a max in $[0,1]$ iff $f$ obtains a max in $[a,b]$
    – Mark
    Sep 8 at 6:53







1




1




The interval of definition is $[a,b]$. Why did you consider $[0,1]$?
– Micheal
Sep 8 at 6:42




The interval of definition is $[a,b]$. Why did you consider $[0,1]$?
– Micheal
Sep 8 at 6:42












its compact interval one u can take any arbitrary compact interval. i edited
– sajan
Sep 8 at 6:53




its compact interval one u can take any arbitrary compact interval. i edited
– sajan
Sep 8 at 6:53












@Micheal define $g(x) = f(x/(b-a) + a)$. $g$ obtains a max in $[0,1]$ iff $f$ obtains a max in $[a,b]$
– Mark
Sep 8 at 6:53




@Micheal define $g(x) = f(x/(b-a) + a)$. $g$ obtains a max in $[0,1]$ iff $f$ obtains a max in $[a,b]$
– Mark
Sep 8 at 6:53

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2909330%2flet-fa-b-to-bbbr-be-continuous-does-max-fxa-leq-x-leq-b-exist%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

1st Magritte Awards