$x^2$ in a different form?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Is it known that $x^2=$ the sum of all of the numbers underneath it doubled, plus $x$?



Thought of it, thinking about pyramid push ups so $3^2= 2(1)+2(2)+3$,



$5^2= 2(1)+2(2)+2(3)+2(4)+5$










share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    Is it known that $x^2=$ the sum of all of the numbers underneath it doubled, plus $x$?



    Thought of it, thinking about pyramid push ups so $3^2= 2(1)+2(2)+3$,



    $5^2= 2(1)+2(2)+2(3)+2(4)+5$










    share|cite|improve this question

























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      Is it known that $x^2=$ the sum of all of the numbers underneath it doubled, plus $x$?



      Thought of it, thinking about pyramid push ups so $3^2= 2(1)+2(2)+3$,



      $5^2= 2(1)+2(2)+2(3)+2(4)+5$










      share|cite|improve this question















      Is it known that $x^2=$ the sum of all of the numbers underneath it doubled, plus $x$?



      Thought of it, thinking about pyramid push ups so $3^2= 2(1)+2(2)+3$,



      $5^2= 2(1)+2(2)+2(3)+2(4)+5$







      elementary-number-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Sep 8 at 20:50









      Daniel Buck

      2,6451625




      2,6451625










      asked Sep 8 at 7:12









      Patch

      141




      141




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          Draw dots formed an $ntimes n$ square, and split it to $3$ parts: one diagonal, dots below it, and dots above it.






          share|cite|improve this answer



























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            You are asking the following
            $$n^2 overset?= 2(1 + 2 + cdots + (n-1)) + n.$$



            You have verified it for $n=3$. (You can check $n=2$ as well.)



            For a proof by induction, you need to prove the inductive step.
            Specifically, if the above holds with $n=k$, can you prove it holds with $n=k+1$?




            $$(k+1)^2 = k^2 + 2k + 1 = (2(1+cdots+(k-1)) + k) + 2k + 1 = 2(1+cdots+k) + (k+1) $$







            share|cite|improve this answer




















            • What I meant, was has it already been thought of? Please forgive my ignorance.
              – Patch
              Sep 8 at 7:36










            • There are lots of this kind of identities, most of them could be found in the e exercise section, for e.g. induction..
              – Berci
              Sep 8 at 7:39










            • Thank you. Very much appreciated.
              – Patch
              Sep 8 at 7:42










            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2909361%2fx2-in-a-different-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote













            Draw dots formed an $ntimes n$ square, and split it to $3$ parts: one diagonal, dots below it, and dots above it.






            share|cite|improve this answer
























              up vote
              2
              down vote













              Draw dots formed an $ntimes n$ square, and split it to $3$ parts: one diagonal, dots below it, and dots above it.






              share|cite|improve this answer






















                up vote
                2
                down vote










                up vote
                2
                down vote









                Draw dots formed an $ntimes n$ square, and split it to $3$ parts: one diagonal, dots below it, and dots above it.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Draw dots formed an $ntimes n$ square, and split it to $3$ parts: one diagonal, dots below it, and dots above it.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Sep 8 at 7:34









                Berci

                57.3k23670




                57.3k23670




















                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote













                    You are asking the following
                    $$n^2 overset?= 2(1 + 2 + cdots + (n-1)) + n.$$



                    You have verified it for $n=3$. (You can check $n=2$ as well.)



                    For a proof by induction, you need to prove the inductive step.
                    Specifically, if the above holds with $n=k$, can you prove it holds with $n=k+1$?




                    $$(k+1)^2 = k^2 + 2k + 1 = (2(1+cdots+(k-1)) + k) + 2k + 1 = 2(1+cdots+k) + (k+1) $$







                    share|cite|improve this answer




















                    • What I meant, was has it already been thought of? Please forgive my ignorance.
                      – Patch
                      Sep 8 at 7:36










                    • There are lots of this kind of identities, most of them could be found in the e exercise section, for e.g. induction..
                      – Berci
                      Sep 8 at 7:39










                    • Thank you. Very much appreciated.
                      – Patch
                      Sep 8 at 7:42














                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote













                    You are asking the following
                    $$n^2 overset?= 2(1 + 2 + cdots + (n-1)) + n.$$



                    You have verified it for $n=3$. (You can check $n=2$ as well.)



                    For a proof by induction, you need to prove the inductive step.
                    Specifically, if the above holds with $n=k$, can you prove it holds with $n=k+1$?




                    $$(k+1)^2 = k^2 + 2k + 1 = (2(1+cdots+(k-1)) + k) + 2k + 1 = 2(1+cdots+k) + (k+1) $$







                    share|cite|improve this answer




















                    • What I meant, was has it already been thought of? Please forgive my ignorance.
                      – Patch
                      Sep 8 at 7:36










                    • There are lots of this kind of identities, most of them could be found in the e exercise section, for e.g. induction..
                      – Berci
                      Sep 8 at 7:39










                    • Thank you. Very much appreciated.
                      – Patch
                      Sep 8 at 7:42












                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote









                    You are asking the following
                    $$n^2 overset?= 2(1 + 2 + cdots + (n-1)) + n.$$



                    You have verified it for $n=3$. (You can check $n=2$ as well.)



                    For a proof by induction, you need to prove the inductive step.
                    Specifically, if the above holds with $n=k$, can you prove it holds with $n=k+1$?




                    $$(k+1)^2 = k^2 + 2k + 1 = (2(1+cdots+(k-1)) + k) + 2k + 1 = 2(1+cdots+k) + (k+1) $$







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    You are asking the following
                    $$n^2 overset?= 2(1 + 2 + cdots + (n-1)) + n.$$



                    You have verified it for $n=3$. (You can check $n=2$ as well.)



                    For a proof by induction, you need to prove the inductive step.
                    Specifically, if the above holds with $n=k$, can you prove it holds with $n=k+1$?




                    $$(k+1)^2 = k^2 + 2k + 1 = (2(1+cdots+(k-1)) + k) + 2k + 1 = 2(1+cdots+k) + (k+1) $$








                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Sep 8 at 7:26









                    angryavian

                    35.4k12976




                    35.4k12976











                    • What I meant, was has it already been thought of? Please forgive my ignorance.
                      – Patch
                      Sep 8 at 7:36










                    • There are lots of this kind of identities, most of them could be found in the e exercise section, for e.g. induction..
                      – Berci
                      Sep 8 at 7:39










                    • Thank you. Very much appreciated.
                      – Patch
                      Sep 8 at 7:42
















                    • What I meant, was has it already been thought of? Please forgive my ignorance.
                      – Patch
                      Sep 8 at 7:36










                    • There are lots of this kind of identities, most of them could be found in the e exercise section, for e.g. induction..
                      – Berci
                      Sep 8 at 7:39










                    • Thank you. Very much appreciated.
                      – Patch
                      Sep 8 at 7:42















                    What I meant, was has it already been thought of? Please forgive my ignorance.
                    – Patch
                    Sep 8 at 7:36




                    What I meant, was has it already been thought of? Please forgive my ignorance.
                    – Patch
                    Sep 8 at 7:36












                    There are lots of this kind of identities, most of them could be found in the e exercise section, for e.g. induction..
                    – Berci
                    Sep 8 at 7:39




                    There are lots of this kind of identities, most of them could be found in the e exercise section, for e.g. induction..
                    – Berci
                    Sep 8 at 7:39












                    Thank you. Very much appreciated.
                    – Patch
                    Sep 8 at 7:42




                    Thank you. Very much appreciated.
                    – Patch
                    Sep 8 at 7:42

















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2909361%2fx2-in-a-different-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    這個網誌中的熱門文章

                    How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                    Carbon dioxide

                    Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?