Boundedness of sublevelsets of strongly convex functions implies boundedness of second-order gradient

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












In page 460 of Stephen Boyd's "Convex Optimization", he described a property of strongly convex functions:




"The inequality (9.8) (i.e. $f(y) geq f(x) + nabla f(x)^T (y - x) + fracm2 |y - x|_2^2$) implies that the sublevel sets contained in $S$ (i.e. $S = f(x) leq f(x^(0))$) are bounded, so in particular, $S$ is bounded. Therefore the maximum eigenvalue of $nabla^2 f(x)$, which is a continuous function of $x$ on $S$, is bounded on $S$"




I don't understand why the boundedness of $S$ implies the boundedness of $nabla^2 f(x)$.



Can anyone explain it for me ? Thank you for reading my question.










share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    In page 460 of Stephen Boyd's "Convex Optimization", he described a property of strongly convex functions:




    "The inequality (9.8) (i.e. $f(y) geq f(x) + nabla f(x)^T (y - x) + fracm2 |y - x|_2^2$) implies that the sublevel sets contained in $S$ (i.e. $S = f(x) leq f(x^(0))$) are bounded, so in particular, $S$ is bounded. Therefore the maximum eigenvalue of $nabla^2 f(x)$, which is a continuous function of $x$ on $S$, is bounded on $S$"




    I don't understand why the boundedness of $S$ implies the boundedness of $nabla^2 f(x)$.



    Can anyone explain it for me ? Thank you for reading my question.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      In page 460 of Stephen Boyd's "Convex Optimization", he described a property of strongly convex functions:




      "The inequality (9.8) (i.e. $f(y) geq f(x) + nabla f(x)^T (y - x) + fracm2 |y - x|_2^2$) implies that the sublevel sets contained in $S$ (i.e. $S = f(x) leq f(x^(0))$) are bounded, so in particular, $S$ is bounded. Therefore the maximum eigenvalue of $nabla^2 f(x)$, which is a continuous function of $x$ on $S$, is bounded on $S$"




      I don't understand why the boundedness of $S$ implies the boundedness of $nabla^2 f(x)$.



      Can anyone explain it for me ? Thank you for reading my question.










      share|cite|improve this question















      In page 460 of Stephen Boyd's "Convex Optimization", he described a property of strongly convex functions:




      "The inequality (9.8) (i.e. $f(y) geq f(x) + nabla f(x)^T (y - x) + fracm2 |y - x|_2^2$) implies that the sublevel sets contained in $S$ (i.e. $S = f(x) leq f(x^(0))$) are bounded, so in particular, $S$ is bounded. Therefore the maximum eigenvalue of $nabla^2 f(x)$, which is a continuous function of $x$ on $S$, is bounded on $S$"




      I don't understand why the boundedness of $S$ implies the boundedness of $nabla^2 f(x)$.



      Can anyone explain it for me ? Thank you for reading my question.







      convex-analysis convex-optimization convex-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Sep 8 at 14:41









      Brian Borchers

      5,24111119




      5,24111119










      asked Sep 8 at 12:12









      HOANG GIANG

      33




      33




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Let



          $g(x)=lambda_max(nabla^2f(x))=| nabla^2f(x) |_2$.



          $g(x)$ is a continuous function.



          $S$ is a closed and bounded subset of $R^n$ and thus compact.



          By the extreme value theorem, $g(x)$ achieves its maximum value on $S$. Call it $M$.



          Thus on $S$, $| nabla^2f(x) |_2$ is bounded by $M$.






          share|cite|improve this answer
















          • 1




            To shows that S is bounded, see the earlier stack exchange question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/993357/…
            – Brian Borchers
            Sep 8 at 22:32










          • Thanks for your answer! Wish you a good day!
            – HOANG GIANG
            Sep 9 at 2:01










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2909563%2fboundedness-of-sublevelsets-of-strongly-convex-functions-implies-boundedness-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Let



          $g(x)=lambda_max(nabla^2f(x))=| nabla^2f(x) |_2$.



          $g(x)$ is a continuous function.



          $S$ is a closed and bounded subset of $R^n$ and thus compact.



          By the extreme value theorem, $g(x)$ achieves its maximum value on $S$. Call it $M$.



          Thus on $S$, $| nabla^2f(x) |_2$ is bounded by $M$.






          share|cite|improve this answer
















          • 1




            To shows that S is bounded, see the earlier stack exchange question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/993357/…
            – Brian Borchers
            Sep 8 at 22:32










          • Thanks for your answer! Wish you a good day!
            – HOANG GIANG
            Sep 9 at 2:01














          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Let



          $g(x)=lambda_max(nabla^2f(x))=| nabla^2f(x) |_2$.



          $g(x)$ is a continuous function.



          $S$ is a closed and bounded subset of $R^n$ and thus compact.



          By the extreme value theorem, $g(x)$ achieves its maximum value on $S$. Call it $M$.



          Thus on $S$, $| nabla^2f(x) |_2$ is bounded by $M$.






          share|cite|improve this answer
















          • 1




            To shows that S is bounded, see the earlier stack exchange question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/993357/…
            – Brian Borchers
            Sep 8 at 22:32










          • Thanks for your answer! Wish you a good day!
            – HOANG GIANG
            Sep 9 at 2:01












          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted






          Let



          $g(x)=lambda_max(nabla^2f(x))=| nabla^2f(x) |_2$.



          $g(x)$ is a continuous function.



          $S$ is a closed and bounded subset of $R^n$ and thus compact.



          By the extreme value theorem, $g(x)$ achieves its maximum value on $S$. Call it $M$.



          Thus on $S$, $| nabla^2f(x) |_2$ is bounded by $M$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Let



          $g(x)=lambda_max(nabla^2f(x))=| nabla^2f(x) |_2$.



          $g(x)$ is a continuous function.



          $S$ is a closed and bounded subset of $R^n$ and thus compact.



          By the extreme value theorem, $g(x)$ achieves its maximum value on $S$. Call it $M$.



          Thus on $S$, $| nabla^2f(x) |_2$ is bounded by $M$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Sep 8 at 15:04









          Brian Borchers

          5,24111119




          5,24111119







          • 1




            To shows that S is bounded, see the earlier stack exchange question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/993357/…
            – Brian Borchers
            Sep 8 at 22:32










          • Thanks for your answer! Wish you a good day!
            – HOANG GIANG
            Sep 9 at 2:01












          • 1




            To shows that S is bounded, see the earlier stack exchange question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/993357/…
            – Brian Borchers
            Sep 8 at 22:32










          • Thanks for your answer! Wish you a good day!
            – HOANG GIANG
            Sep 9 at 2:01







          1




          1




          To shows that S is bounded, see the earlier stack exchange question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/993357/…
          – Brian Borchers
          Sep 8 at 22:32




          To shows that S is bounded, see the earlier stack exchange question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/993357/…
          – Brian Borchers
          Sep 8 at 22:32












          Thanks for your answer! Wish you a good day!
          – HOANG GIANG
          Sep 9 at 2:01




          Thanks for your answer! Wish you a good day!
          – HOANG GIANG
          Sep 9 at 2:01

















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2909563%2fboundedness-of-sublevelsets-of-strongly-convex-functions-implies-boundedness-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          Carbon dioxide

          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?