Non empty set and group
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
Let $E$ be a non empty set. How to prove that there exists $star:Etimes Erightarrow E$ for which $(E,star)$ is a group?
group-theory
add a comment |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
Let $E$ be a non empty set. How to prove that there exists $star:Etimes Erightarrow E$ for which $(E,star)$ is a group?
group-theory
What are your thoughts about that?
â Taroccoesbrocco
Sep 8 at 9:48
This is equivalent to the axiom of choice. See mathoverflow.net/questions/12973/â¦
â user21793
Sep 8 at 10:24
add a comment |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
Let $E$ be a non empty set. How to prove that there exists $star:Etimes Erightarrow E$ for which $(E,star)$ is a group?
group-theory
Let $E$ be a non empty set. How to prove that there exists $star:Etimes Erightarrow E$ for which $(E,star)$ is a group?
group-theory
group-theory
asked Sep 8 at 9:44
Eric
21
21
What are your thoughts about that?
â Taroccoesbrocco
Sep 8 at 9:48
This is equivalent to the axiom of choice. See mathoverflow.net/questions/12973/â¦
â user21793
Sep 8 at 10:24
add a comment |Â
What are your thoughts about that?
â Taroccoesbrocco
Sep 8 at 9:48
This is equivalent to the axiom of choice. See mathoverflow.net/questions/12973/â¦
â user21793
Sep 8 at 10:24
What are your thoughts about that?
â Taroccoesbrocco
Sep 8 at 9:48
What are your thoughts about that?
â Taroccoesbrocco
Sep 8 at 9:48
This is equivalent to the axiom of choice. See mathoverflow.net/questions/12973/â¦
â user21793
Sep 8 at 10:24
This is equivalent to the axiom of choice. See mathoverflow.net/questions/12973/â¦
â user21793
Sep 8 at 10:24
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
If $E$ is finite, you can just identify $E$ with $Bbb Z/nBbb Z$, where $n=|E|$.
If $E$ is countably infinite, you can similarly identify it with $Bbb Z$ (or $Bbb Q$ for that matter).
More generally, for any infinite cardinality of $E$, you can consider the set of groups with carrier sets $subseteq E$, ordered by inclusion. Using Zorn's lemma, there is a maximal such group $M$. Conclude that $|M|>|Esetminus M|$ (and hence $|M|=|E|$, as desired) because otherwise you could build $Mhookrightarrow MoplusBbb Z/2Bbb Zsubseteq E$, contradicting maximality.
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
If $E$ is finite, you can just identify $E$ with $Bbb Z/nBbb Z$, where $n=|E|$.
If $E$ is countably infinite, you can similarly identify it with $Bbb Z$ (or $Bbb Q$ for that matter).
More generally, for any infinite cardinality of $E$, you can consider the set of groups with carrier sets $subseteq E$, ordered by inclusion. Using Zorn's lemma, there is a maximal such group $M$. Conclude that $|M|>|Esetminus M|$ (and hence $|M|=|E|$, as desired) because otherwise you could build $Mhookrightarrow MoplusBbb Z/2Bbb Zsubseteq E$, contradicting maximality.
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
If $E$ is finite, you can just identify $E$ with $Bbb Z/nBbb Z$, where $n=|E|$.
If $E$ is countably infinite, you can similarly identify it with $Bbb Z$ (or $Bbb Q$ for that matter).
More generally, for any infinite cardinality of $E$, you can consider the set of groups with carrier sets $subseteq E$, ordered by inclusion. Using Zorn's lemma, there is a maximal such group $M$. Conclude that $|M|>|Esetminus M|$ (and hence $|M|=|E|$, as desired) because otherwise you could build $Mhookrightarrow MoplusBbb Z/2Bbb Zsubseteq E$, contradicting maximality.
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
If $E$ is finite, you can just identify $E$ with $Bbb Z/nBbb Z$, where $n=|E|$.
If $E$ is countably infinite, you can similarly identify it with $Bbb Z$ (or $Bbb Q$ for that matter).
More generally, for any infinite cardinality of $E$, you can consider the set of groups with carrier sets $subseteq E$, ordered by inclusion. Using Zorn's lemma, there is a maximal such group $M$. Conclude that $|M|>|Esetminus M|$ (and hence $|M|=|E|$, as desired) because otherwise you could build $Mhookrightarrow MoplusBbb Z/2Bbb Zsubseteq E$, contradicting maximality.
If $E$ is finite, you can just identify $E$ with $Bbb Z/nBbb Z$, where $n=|E|$.
If $E$ is countably infinite, you can similarly identify it with $Bbb Z$ (or $Bbb Q$ for that matter).
More generally, for any infinite cardinality of $E$, you can consider the set of groups with carrier sets $subseteq E$, ordered by inclusion. Using Zorn's lemma, there is a maximal such group $M$. Conclude that $|M|>|Esetminus M|$ (and hence $|M|=|E|$, as desired) because otherwise you could build $Mhookrightarrow MoplusBbb Z/2Bbb Zsubseteq E$, contradicting maximality.
answered Sep 8 at 9:50
Hagen von Eitzen
267k21260483
267k21260483
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2909462%2fnon-empty-set-and-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
What are your thoughts about that?
â Taroccoesbrocco
Sep 8 at 9:48
This is equivalent to the axiom of choice. See mathoverflow.net/questions/12973/â¦
â user21793
Sep 8 at 10:24