Is $f(z)$ entire?

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am trying to determine if the the following is entire $$f(z)= begincases
e^-z^-4 & zneq0 \
0 & z=0\
endcases
$$
My attempt:
Consider $zne 0$. $f(z)=e^-z^-4$ is the composition of two differentiable functions, hence $f$ is differentiable when $zneq 0$.
Next I considered $z=0$. The Cauchy-Riemann equations are satisfied at $z=0$, as $u_x=u_y=v_x=v_y=0$. But this is not sufficient condition for complex differentiability. I wish to show $f$ is continuous/discontinuous at $z=0$.
I tried defining the limit $$f(z)=lim_zto 0 e^-z^-4=e^-infty=0$$
This would imply $f$ is continuous at $z=0$, but the answer I have disagrees.
edit
If I let $z=re^itheta$, then
beginalign
lim_zto 0 e^-z^-4&=lim_rto 0 e^-frac1r^4e^-4itheta \
&=lim_rto 0 e^frac1r^4rightarrow infty textletting left(theta=fracpi4right) \
endalign
Hence, $f$ is not continuous at $z=0implies f$ is not differentible at $z=0$.
So $f$ is not entire.
complex-analysis continuity entire-functions
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am trying to determine if the the following is entire $$f(z)= begincases
e^-z^-4 & zneq0 \
0 & z=0\
endcases
$$
My attempt:
Consider $zne 0$. $f(z)=e^-z^-4$ is the composition of two differentiable functions, hence $f$ is differentiable when $zneq 0$.
Next I considered $z=0$. The Cauchy-Riemann equations are satisfied at $z=0$, as $u_x=u_y=v_x=v_y=0$. But this is not sufficient condition for complex differentiability. I wish to show $f$ is continuous/discontinuous at $z=0$.
I tried defining the limit $$f(z)=lim_zto 0 e^-z^-4=e^-infty=0$$
This would imply $f$ is continuous at $z=0$, but the answer I have disagrees.
edit
If I let $z=re^itheta$, then
beginalign
lim_zto 0 e^-z^-4&=lim_rto 0 e^-frac1r^4e^-4itheta \
&=lim_rto 0 e^frac1r^4rightarrow infty textletting left(theta=fracpi4right) \
endalign
Hence, $f$ is not continuous at $z=0implies f$ is not differentible at $z=0$.
So $f$ is not entire.
complex-analysis continuity entire-functions
2
Try calculating the Taylor series expansion at $z=0$, you'll be surprised...
â Trebor
Aug 20 at 5:44
Almost duplicate of math.stackexchange.com/questions/2717209/â¦
â mfl
Aug 20 at 5:45
4
Possible duplicate of Ways to see if a function $f(z)$ is holomorphic
â TRUSKI
Aug 20 at 5:58
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am trying to determine if the the following is entire $$f(z)= begincases
e^-z^-4 & zneq0 \
0 & z=0\
endcases
$$
My attempt:
Consider $zne 0$. $f(z)=e^-z^-4$ is the composition of two differentiable functions, hence $f$ is differentiable when $zneq 0$.
Next I considered $z=0$. The Cauchy-Riemann equations are satisfied at $z=0$, as $u_x=u_y=v_x=v_y=0$. But this is not sufficient condition for complex differentiability. I wish to show $f$ is continuous/discontinuous at $z=0$.
I tried defining the limit $$f(z)=lim_zto 0 e^-z^-4=e^-infty=0$$
This would imply $f$ is continuous at $z=0$, but the answer I have disagrees.
edit
If I let $z=re^itheta$, then
beginalign
lim_zto 0 e^-z^-4&=lim_rto 0 e^-frac1r^4e^-4itheta \
&=lim_rto 0 e^frac1r^4rightarrow infty textletting left(theta=fracpi4right) \
endalign
Hence, $f$ is not continuous at $z=0implies f$ is not differentible at $z=0$.
So $f$ is not entire.
complex-analysis continuity entire-functions
I am trying to determine if the the following is entire $$f(z)= begincases
e^-z^-4 & zneq0 \
0 & z=0\
endcases
$$
My attempt:
Consider $zne 0$. $f(z)=e^-z^-4$ is the composition of two differentiable functions, hence $f$ is differentiable when $zneq 0$.
Next I considered $z=0$. The Cauchy-Riemann equations are satisfied at $z=0$, as $u_x=u_y=v_x=v_y=0$. But this is not sufficient condition for complex differentiability. I wish to show $f$ is continuous/discontinuous at $z=0$.
I tried defining the limit $$f(z)=lim_zto 0 e^-z^-4=e^-infty=0$$
This would imply $f$ is continuous at $z=0$, but the answer I have disagrees.
edit
If I let $z=re^itheta$, then
beginalign
lim_zto 0 e^-z^-4&=lim_rto 0 e^-frac1r^4e^-4itheta \
&=lim_rto 0 e^frac1r^4rightarrow infty textletting left(theta=fracpi4right) \
endalign
Hence, $f$ is not continuous at $z=0implies f$ is not differentible at $z=0$.
So $f$ is not entire.
complex-analysis continuity entire-functions
edited Aug 20 at 7:28
asked Aug 20 at 5:38
Bell
741313
741313
2
Try calculating the Taylor series expansion at $z=0$, you'll be surprised...
â Trebor
Aug 20 at 5:44
Almost duplicate of math.stackexchange.com/questions/2717209/â¦
â mfl
Aug 20 at 5:45
4
Possible duplicate of Ways to see if a function $f(z)$ is holomorphic
â TRUSKI
Aug 20 at 5:58
add a comment |Â
2
Try calculating the Taylor series expansion at $z=0$, you'll be surprised...
â Trebor
Aug 20 at 5:44
Almost duplicate of math.stackexchange.com/questions/2717209/â¦
â mfl
Aug 20 at 5:45
4
Possible duplicate of Ways to see if a function $f(z)$ is holomorphic
â TRUSKI
Aug 20 at 5:58
2
2
Try calculating the Taylor series expansion at $z=0$, you'll be surprised...
â Trebor
Aug 20 at 5:44
Try calculating the Taylor series expansion at $z=0$, you'll be surprised...
â Trebor
Aug 20 at 5:44
Almost duplicate of math.stackexchange.com/questions/2717209/â¦
â mfl
Aug 20 at 5:45
Almost duplicate of math.stackexchange.com/questions/2717209/â¦
â mfl
Aug 20 at 5:45
4
4
Possible duplicate of Ways to see if a function $f(z)$ is holomorphic
â TRUSKI
Aug 20 at 5:58
Possible duplicate of Ways to see if a function $f(z)$ is holomorphic
â TRUSKI
Aug 20 at 5:58
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Hint: consider $z=x+xi$ for real $xto0$.
I'm sorry, but I'm having trouble computing this limit. I understand that we're trying to find a limit that doesn't approach 0, but I'm having trouble with the calculations. Does the limit exist?
â Bell
Aug 20 at 6:08
1
@Bell If $z = x + ix$ (or maybe it's easier to use $frac1sqrt2(x+ix)$ since that has absolute value 1, you decide), what is $z^4$, in terms of $x$? What is $z^-4$? What is $-z^-4$? What happens to this expression when $xto 0$? What happens to the exponential?
â Arthur
Aug 20 at 6:29
Thanks. This makes sense. I also tried another way (in my edit above), by considering a ray inclined by $fracpi4$ from the positive real axis. Does this also work?
â Bell
Aug 20 at 7:29
1
@Bell It's exactly the same approach, only geometrically rather than algebraically ($x+xi$ for real $x$ is that line, and if you also say $x>0$ you get the ray). So yes, that ought to give the same result.
â Arthur
Aug 20 at 7:47
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
For each positive interger $n$ lat $c_n$ be a fourth root of $ 2nipi $ and $z_n = frac 1 c_n$Then $|e^-z_n^-4 |=1$ for all $n$ and $z_n to 0$.
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Hint: consider $z=x+xi$ for real $xto0$.
I'm sorry, but I'm having trouble computing this limit. I understand that we're trying to find a limit that doesn't approach 0, but I'm having trouble with the calculations. Does the limit exist?
â Bell
Aug 20 at 6:08
1
@Bell If $z = x + ix$ (or maybe it's easier to use $frac1sqrt2(x+ix)$ since that has absolute value 1, you decide), what is $z^4$, in terms of $x$? What is $z^-4$? What is $-z^-4$? What happens to this expression when $xto 0$? What happens to the exponential?
â Arthur
Aug 20 at 6:29
Thanks. This makes sense. I also tried another way (in my edit above), by considering a ray inclined by $fracpi4$ from the positive real axis. Does this also work?
â Bell
Aug 20 at 7:29
1
@Bell It's exactly the same approach, only geometrically rather than algebraically ($x+xi$ for real $x$ is that line, and if you also say $x>0$ you get the ray). So yes, that ought to give the same result.
â Arthur
Aug 20 at 7:47
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Hint: consider $z=x+xi$ for real $xto0$.
I'm sorry, but I'm having trouble computing this limit. I understand that we're trying to find a limit that doesn't approach 0, but I'm having trouble with the calculations. Does the limit exist?
â Bell
Aug 20 at 6:08
1
@Bell If $z = x + ix$ (or maybe it's easier to use $frac1sqrt2(x+ix)$ since that has absolute value 1, you decide), what is $z^4$, in terms of $x$? What is $z^-4$? What is $-z^-4$? What happens to this expression when $xto 0$? What happens to the exponential?
â Arthur
Aug 20 at 6:29
Thanks. This makes sense. I also tried another way (in my edit above), by considering a ray inclined by $fracpi4$ from the positive real axis. Does this also work?
â Bell
Aug 20 at 7:29
1
@Bell It's exactly the same approach, only geometrically rather than algebraically ($x+xi$ for real $x$ is that line, and if you also say $x>0$ you get the ray). So yes, that ought to give the same result.
â Arthur
Aug 20 at 7:47
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Hint: consider $z=x+xi$ for real $xto0$.
Hint: consider $z=x+xi$ for real $xto0$.
answered Aug 20 at 5:45
Arthur
100k793176
100k793176
I'm sorry, but I'm having trouble computing this limit. I understand that we're trying to find a limit that doesn't approach 0, but I'm having trouble with the calculations. Does the limit exist?
â Bell
Aug 20 at 6:08
1
@Bell If $z = x + ix$ (or maybe it's easier to use $frac1sqrt2(x+ix)$ since that has absolute value 1, you decide), what is $z^4$, in terms of $x$? What is $z^-4$? What is $-z^-4$? What happens to this expression when $xto 0$? What happens to the exponential?
â Arthur
Aug 20 at 6:29
Thanks. This makes sense. I also tried another way (in my edit above), by considering a ray inclined by $fracpi4$ from the positive real axis. Does this also work?
â Bell
Aug 20 at 7:29
1
@Bell It's exactly the same approach, only geometrically rather than algebraically ($x+xi$ for real $x$ is that line, and if you also say $x>0$ you get the ray). So yes, that ought to give the same result.
â Arthur
Aug 20 at 7:47
add a comment |Â
I'm sorry, but I'm having trouble computing this limit. I understand that we're trying to find a limit that doesn't approach 0, but I'm having trouble with the calculations. Does the limit exist?
â Bell
Aug 20 at 6:08
1
@Bell If $z = x + ix$ (or maybe it's easier to use $frac1sqrt2(x+ix)$ since that has absolute value 1, you decide), what is $z^4$, in terms of $x$? What is $z^-4$? What is $-z^-4$? What happens to this expression when $xto 0$? What happens to the exponential?
â Arthur
Aug 20 at 6:29
Thanks. This makes sense. I also tried another way (in my edit above), by considering a ray inclined by $fracpi4$ from the positive real axis. Does this also work?
â Bell
Aug 20 at 7:29
1
@Bell It's exactly the same approach, only geometrically rather than algebraically ($x+xi$ for real $x$ is that line, and if you also say $x>0$ you get the ray). So yes, that ought to give the same result.
â Arthur
Aug 20 at 7:47
I'm sorry, but I'm having trouble computing this limit. I understand that we're trying to find a limit that doesn't approach 0, but I'm having trouble with the calculations. Does the limit exist?
â Bell
Aug 20 at 6:08
I'm sorry, but I'm having trouble computing this limit. I understand that we're trying to find a limit that doesn't approach 0, but I'm having trouble with the calculations. Does the limit exist?
â Bell
Aug 20 at 6:08
1
1
@Bell If $z = x + ix$ (or maybe it's easier to use $frac1sqrt2(x+ix)$ since that has absolute value 1, you decide), what is $z^4$, in terms of $x$? What is $z^-4$? What is $-z^-4$? What happens to this expression when $xto 0$? What happens to the exponential?
â Arthur
Aug 20 at 6:29
@Bell If $z = x + ix$ (or maybe it's easier to use $frac1sqrt2(x+ix)$ since that has absolute value 1, you decide), what is $z^4$, in terms of $x$? What is $z^-4$? What is $-z^-4$? What happens to this expression when $xto 0$? What happens to the exponential?
â Arthur
Aug 20 at 6:29
Thanks. This makes sense. I also tried another way (in my edit above), by considering a ray inclined by $fracpi4$ from the positive real axis. Does this also work?
â Bell
Aug 20 at 7:29
Thanks. This makes sense. I also tried another way (in my edit above), by considering a ray inclined by $fracpi4$ from the positive real axis. Does this also work?
â Bell
Aug 20 at 7:29
1
1
@Bell It's exactly the same approach, only geometrically rather than algebraically ($x+xi$ for real $x$ is that line, and if you also say $x>0$ you get the ray). So yes, that ought to give the same result.
â Arthur
Aug 20 at 7:47
@Bell It's exactly the same approach, only geometrically rather than algebraically ($x+xi$ for real $x$ is that line, and if you also say $x>0$ you get the ray). So yes, that ought to give the same result.
â Arthur
Aug 20 at 7:47
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
For each positive interger $n$ lat $c_n$ be a fourth root of $ 2nipi $ and $z_n = frac 1 c_n$Then $|e^-z_n^-4 |=1$ for all $n$ and $z_n to 0$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
For each positive interger $n$ lat $c_n$ be a fourth root of $ 2nipi $ and $z_n = frac 1 c_n$Then $|e^-z_n^-4 |=1$ for all $n$ and $z_n to 0$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
For each positive interger $n$ lat $c_n$ be a fourth root of $ 2nipi $ and $z_n = frac 1 c_n$Then $|e^-z_n^-4 |=1$ for all $n$ and $z_n to 0$.
For each positive interger $n$ lat $c_n$ be a fourth root of $ 2nipi $ and $z_n = frac 1 c_n$Then $|e^-z_n^-4 |=1$ for all $n$ and $z_n to 0$.
answered Aug 20 at 5:45
Kavi Rama Murthy
23.3k2933
23.3k2933
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2888437%2fis-fz-entire%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
2
Try calculating the Taylor series expansion at $z=0$, you'll be surprised...
â Trebor
Aug 20 at 5:44
Almost duplicate of math.stackexchange.com/questions/2717209/â¦
â mfl
Aug 20 at 5:45
4
Possible duplicate of Ways to see if a function $f(z)$ is holomorphic
â TRUSKI
Aug 20 at 5:58