Combinatorial species for a given generating function

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Analytic combinatorics is a fascinating branch of mathematics with astonishing results (for the novice), e.g. that the number $a_n$ of distinct rooted binary trees with exactly $n$ branching nodes is the coefficient $c_n$ of the expansion of the function



$$c(z) = frac1- sqrt1 - 4z2z$$



which happens to be the Catalan number $C_n$.



Very roughly stated, the typical problem in analytic combinatorics is: Given a combinatorial species out of a family of species $S$, find a analytic function $f(z)$ (its generating function) in a family of functions $F$ such that the coefficients $c_n$ of $f$'s expansion give the numbers $a_n$ of (finite) members of the species characterized by $n$.



I assume that $S$ and $F$ can be (and usually are) chosen such that for all (at least sufficiently gentle) combinatorial species $s in S$ there is a function $f in F$, such that $f$ is the generating function of $s$.



My question is: Is there an example of natural families $S$ and $F$ with a significant amount of (sufficiently gentle) functions $f$ (ideally all) such that there is an $s in S$ which $f$ is the generating function of?



Or are there heuristic arguments that for all natural families $S$ and $F$ for possibly almost all $f in F$ there is no combinatorial species $s in S$ which $f$ is the generating function of?



(A natural family $F$ should not be a super-family $F'$ with all non-generating functions excluded.)







share|cite|improve this question
























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Analytic combinatorics is a fascinating branch of mathematics with astonishing results (for the novice), e.g. that the number $a_n$ of distinct rooted binary trees with exactly $n$ branching nodes is the coefficient $c_n$ of the expansion of the function



    $$c(z) = frac1- sqrt1 - 4z2z$$



    which happens to be the Catalan number $C_n$.



    Very roughly stated, the typical problem in analytic combinatorics is: Given a combinatorial species out of a family of species $S$, find a analytic function $f(z)$ (its generating function) in a family of functions $F$ such that the coefficients $c_n$ of $f$'s expansion give the numbers $a_n$ of (finite) members of the species characterized by $n$.



    I assume that $S$ and $F$ can be (and usually are) chosen such that for all (at least sufficiently gentle) combinatorial species $s in S$ there is a function $f in F$, such that $f$ is the generating function of $s$.



    My question is: Is there an example of natural families $S$ and $F$ with a significant amount of (sufficiently gentle) functions $f$ (ideally all) such that there is an $s in S$ which $f$ is the generating function of?



    Or are there heuristic arguments that for all natural families $S$ and $F$ for possibly almost all $f in F$ there is no combinatorial species $s in S$ which $f$ is the generating function of?



    (A natural family $F$ should not be a super-family $F'$ with all non-generating functions excluded.)







    share|cite|improve this question






















      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Analytic combinatorics is a fascinating branch of mathematics with astonishing results (for the novice), e.g. that the number $a_n$ of distinct rooted binary trees with exactly $n$ branching nodes is the coefficient $c_n$ of the expansion of the function



      $$c(z) = frac1- sqrt1 - 4z2z$$



      which happens to be the Catalan number $C_n$.



      Very roughly stated, the typical problem in analytic combinatorics is: Given a combinatorial species out of a family of species $S$, find a analytic function $f(z)$ (its generating function) in a family of functions $F$ such that the coefficients $c_n$ of $f$'s expansion give the numbers $a_n$ of (finite) members of the species characterized by $n$.



      I assume that $S$ and $F$ can be (and usually are) chosen such that for all (at least sufficiently gentle) combinatorial species $s in S$ there is a function $f in F$, such that $f$ is the generating function of $s$.



      My question is: Is there an example of natural families $S$ and $F$ with a significant amount of (sufficiently gentle) functions $f$ (ideally all) such that there is an $s in S$ which $f$ is the generating function of?



      Or are there heuristic arguments that for all natural families $S$ and $F$ for possibly almost all $f in F$ there is no combinatorial species $s in S$ which $f$ is the generating function of?



      (A natural family $F$ should not be a super-family $F'$ with all non-generating functions excluded.)







      share|cite|improve this question












      Analytic combinatorics is a fascinating branch of mathematics with astonishing results (for the novice), e.g. that the number $a_n$ of distinct rooted binary trees with exactly $n$ branching nodes is the coefficient $c_n$ of the expansion of the function



      $$c(z) = frac1- sqrt1 - 4z2z$$



      which happens to be the Catalan number $C_n$.



      Very roughly stated, the typical problem in analytic combinatorics is: Given a combinatorial species out of a family of species $S$, find a analytic function $f(z)$ (its generating function) in a family of functions $F$ such that the coefficients $c_n$ of $f$'s expansion give the numbers $a_n$ of (finite) members of the species characterized by $n$.



      I assume that $S$ and $F$ can be (and usually are) chosen such that for all (at least sufficiently gentle) combinatorial species $s in S$ there is a function $f in F$, such that $f$ is the generating function of $s$.



      My question is: Is there an example of natural families $S$ and $F$ with a significant amount of (sufficiently gentle) functions $f$ (ideally all) such that there is an $s in S$ which $f$ is the generating function of?



      Or are there heuristic arguments that for all natural families $S$ and $F$ for possibly almost all $f in F$ there is no combinatorial species $s in S$ which $f$ is the generating function of?



      (A natural family $F$ should not be a super-family $F'$ with all non-generating functions excluded.)









      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Aug 20 at 8:26









      Hans Stricker

      4,34213574




      4,34213574

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2888529%2fcombinatorial-species-for-a-given-generating-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2888529%2fcombinatorial-species-for-a-given-generating-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

          Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?