How do I align equations in a multicols environment

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












I use the following code



beginmulticols2
noindent

 beginequation
 F_besch=m_fzg cdot a_trans
 labeleq:trans
 endequation

 beginequation
 M_besch=sum_n=1^nJ_n cdot dotomega_n
 labeleq:rot
 endequation
endmulticols


to write two equations in one line.



Equations are not aligned



As it can be seen in the picture, the equations are not exactly aligned (propably due to the sum).



How can they be aligned?




equations multicol




share|improve this question


















  • 2




    Welcome to TeX SX! Please post a full compilable code, not just a snippet – moreover incomplete.
    – Bernard
    Aug 20 at 9:02






  • 1




    do you usemulticols just to this two equation that they be parallel)?
    – Zarko
    Aug 20 at 9:09














up vote
4
down vote

favorite












I use the following code



beginmulticols2
noindent

 beginequation
 F_besch=m_fzg cdot a_trans
 labeleq:trans
 endequation

 beginequation
 M_besch=sum_n=1^nJ_n cdot dotomega_n
 labeleq:rot
 endequation
endmulticols


to write two equations in one line.



Equations are not aligned



As it can be seen in the picture, the equations are not exactly aligned (propably due to the sum).



How can they be aligned?




equations multicol




share|improve this question


















  • 2




    Welcome to TeX SX! Please post a full compilable code, not just a snippet – moreover incomplete.
    – Bernard
    Aug 20 at 9:02






  • 1




    do you usemulticols just to this two equation that they be parallel)?
    – Zarko
    Aug 20 at 9:09












up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











I use the following code



beginmulticols2
noindent

 beginequation
 F_besch=m_fzg cdot a_trans
 labeleq:trans
 endequation

 beginequation
 M_besch=sum_n=1^nJ_n cdot dotomega_n
 labeleq:rot
 endequation
endmulticols


to write two equations in one line.



Equations are not aligned



As it can be seen in the picture, the equations are not exactly aligned (propably due to the sum).



How can they be aligned?




equations multicol




share|improve this question














I use the following code



beginmulticols2
noindent

 beginequation
 F_besch=m_fzg cdot a_trans
 labeleq:trans
 endequation

 beginequation
 M_besch=sum_n=1^nJ_n cdot dotomega_n
 labeleq:rot
 endequation
endmulticols


to write two equations in one line.



Equations are not aligned



As it can be seen in the picture, the equations are not exactly aligned (propably due to the sum).



How can they be aligned?





equations multicol





share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 20 at 9:06









Raaja

1,4571522




1,4571522










asked Aug 20 at 8:58









Fabian

211




211







  • 2




    Welcome to TeX SX! Please post a full compilable code, not just a snippet – moreover incomplete.
    – Bernard
    Aug 20 at 9:02






  • 1




    do you usemulticols just to this two equation that they be parallel)?
    – Zarko
    Aug 20 at 9:09












  • 2




    Welcome to TeX SX! Please post a full compilable code, not just a snippet – moreover incomplete.
    – Bernard
    Aug 20 at 9:02






  • 1




    do you usemulticols just to this two equation that they be parallel)?
    – Zarko
    Aug 20 at 9:09







2




2




Welcome to TeX SX! Please post a full compilable code, not just a snippet – moreover incomplete.
– Bernard
Aug 20 at 9:02




Welcome to TeX SX! Please post a full compilable code, not just a snippet – moreover incomplete.
– Bernard
Aug 20 at 9:02




1




1




do you usemulticols just to this two equation that they be parallel)?
– Zarko
Aug 20 at 9:09




do you usemulticols just to this two equation that they be parallel)?
– Zarko
Aug 20 at 9:09










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote













You can use two minipages side by side and a vphantom in the l.h.s. equation. As your indices look like words, it's better to type them as text.



documentclass[11pt,a4paper]article
usepackageamsmath

begindocument

noindentbeginminipage0.49linewidth
 beginequation
 F_textbesch=m_fzg cdot a_texttransvphantomsum_n=1^nJ_n
 labeleq:trans
 endequation
endminipage
hfill
beginminipage0.48linewidth
 beginequation
 M_textbesch=sum_n=1^nJ_n cdot dotomega_n
 labeleq:rot
 endequation
endminipage

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • I would encase "fzg" in a text directive as well.
    – Mico
    Aug 20 at 9:30






  • 1




    @Mico: I wondered, and thought maybe it's the product of three variables.
    – Bernard
    Aug 20 at 9:33

















up vote
4
down vote













Using multicols for this is not simple, because of various vertical skips that are added. I would suggest a couple of minipages:



Sample output



documentclassarticle

usepackageamsmath,multicol

begindocument

Text
begincenter
 beginminipage[b].45textwidth
 beginequation
 F_mathitbesch=m_mathitfzg cdot a_mathittrans
 labeleq:trans
 endequation
 endminipage
 quad
 beginminipage[b].45textwidth
 beginequation
 M_mathitbesch=sum_n=1^nJ_n cdot dotomega_n
 labeleq:rot
 endequation
 endminipage
endcenter

enddocument


Notice the b alignment option to align baselines.



I have also added mathit to your multi-letter supbscripts for better spacing; mathrm may be actually more appropriate depending on the context.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    Is the center environment needed? For sure, it will add extra vertical padding, which may not be desirable?
    – Mico
    Aug 20 at 9:34






  • 1




    @Mico Depends on what alignment the OP wants. Less vertical space would be added by noindentbegintabularc...endtabular instead of begincenter...endcenter
    – Andrew Swann
    Aug 20 at 9:51

















up vote
4
down vote













I think you're abusing the multicols environment. Consider using two side-by-side minipage environments -- each of width 0.45textwidth -- instead.



enter image description here



documentclassarticle
usepackage[utf8]inputenc
usepackage[T1]fontenc
usepackageamsmath
numberwithinequationsection % just for this example
newcommandvn[1]mathit#1 % to typeset variable names
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath % optional

begindocument
setcountersection2 % just for this example
setcounterequation3 % just for this example

hrule % just to illustrate width of text block
noindent
beginminipage0.45textwidth
 beginequation labeleq:trans
 F_vnbesch=m_vnfzg cdot a_vntrans
 vphantomsum_1^n % to balance heights of formulas across the equations
 endequation
endminipage
hfill % maximize horiz. separation between the 'minipage' environments
beginminipage0.45textwidth
 beginequation labeleq:rot
 M_vnbesch=sum_n=1^n J_n cdot dotomega_n
 endequation
endminipage
enddocument





share|improve this answer





























    up vote
    4
    down vote













    I guess that you'd like to have just these two equations in parallel. For this, it is better suited to use a tabular environment with the m column type (from the package array):



    enter image description here



    (red lines indicate text borders)



    documentclassarticle
    usepackagearray

    begindocument
    noindent%
    begintabular@ *2mdimexpr0.5linewidth-tabcolsep @
     beginequation
     F_mathitbesch=m_mathitfzg cdot a_mathittrans
     labeleq:trans
     endequation
    &
     beginequation
     M_mathitbesch=sum_n=1^nJ_n cdot dotomega_n
     labeleq:rot
     endequation
    endtabular
    enddocument





    share|improve this answer






















      Your Answer







      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "85"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );








       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f446783%2fhow-do-i-align-equations-in-a-multicols-environment%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest

















      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      4
      down vote













      You can use two minipages side by side and a vphantom in the l.h.s. equation. As your indices look like words, it's better to type them as text.



      documentclass[11pt,a4paper]article
      usepackageamsmath

      begindocument

      noindentbeginminipage0.49linewidth
       beginequation
       F_textbesch=m_fzg cdot a_texttransvphantomsum_n=1^nJ_n
       labeleq:trans
       endequation
      endminipage
      hfill
      beginminipage0.48linewidth
       beginequation
       M_textbesch=sum_n=1^nJ_n cdot dotomega_n
       labeleq:rot
       endequation
      endminipage

      enddocument


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer




















      • I would encase "fzg" in a text directive as well.
        – Mico
        Aug 20 at 9:30






      • 1




        @Mico: I wondered, and thought maybe it's the product of three variables.
        – Bernard
        Aug 20 at 9:33














      up vote
      4
      down vote













      You can use two minipages side by side and a vphantom in the l.h.s. equation. As your indices look like words, it's better to type them as text.



      documentclass[11pt,a4paper]article
      usepackageamsmath

      begindocument

      noindentbeginminipage0.49linewidth
       beginequation
       F_textbesch=m_fzg cdot a_texttransvphantomsum_n=1^nJ_n
       labeleq:trans
       endequation
      endminipage
      hfill
      beginminipage0.48linewidth
       beginequation
       M_textbesch=sum_n=1^nJ_n cdot dotomega_n
       labeleq:rot
       endequation
      endminipage

      enddocument


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer




















      • I would encase "fzg" in a text directive as well.
        – Mico
        Aug 20 at 9:30






      • 1




        @Mico: I wondered, and thought maybe it's the product of three variables.
        – Bernard
        Aug 20 at 9:33












      up vote
      4
      down vote










      up vote
      4
      down vote









      You can use two minipages side by side and a vphantom in the l.h.s. equation. As your indices look like words, it's better to type them as text.



      documentclass[11pt,a4paper]article
      usepackageamsmath

      begindocument

      noindentbeginminipage0.49linewidth
       beginequation
       F_textbesch=m_fzg cdot a_texttransvphantomsum_n=1^nJ_n
       labeleq:trans
       endequation
      endminipage
      hfill
      beginminipage0.48linewidth
       beginequation
       M_textbesch=sum_n=1^nJ_n cdot dotomega_n
       labeleq:rot
       endequation
      endminipage

      enddocument


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer












      You can use two minipages side by side and a vphantom in the l.h.s. equation. As your indices look like words, it's better to type them as text.



      documentclass[11pt,a4paper]article
      usepackageamsmath

      begindocument

      noindentbeginminipage0.49linewidth
       beginequation
       F_textbesch=m_fzg cdot a_texttransvphantomsum_n=1^nJ_n
       labeleq:trans
       endequation
      endminipage
      hfill
      beginminipage0.48linewidth
       beginequation
       M_textbesch=sum_n=1^nJ_n cdot dotomega_n
       labeleq:rot
       endequation
      endminipage

      enddocument


      enter image description here







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Aug 20 at 9:24









      Bernard

      155k762188




      155k762188











      • I would encase "fzg" in a text directive as well.
        – Mico
        Aug 20 at 9:30






      • 1




        @Mico: I wondered, and thought maybe it's the product of three variables.
        – Bernard
        Aug 20 at 9:33
















      • I would encase "fzg" in a text directive as well.
        – Mico
        Aug 20 at 9:30






      • 1




        @Mico: I wondered, and thought maybe it's the product of three variables.
        – Bernard
        Aug 20 at 9:33















      I would encase "fzg" in a text directive as well.
      – Mico
      Aug 20 at 9:30




      I would encase "fzg" in a text directive as well.
      – Mico
      Aug 20 at 9:30




      1




      1




      @Mico: I wondered, and thought maybe it's the product of three variables.
      – Bernard
      Aug 20 at 9:33




      @Mico: I wondered, and thought maybe it's the product of three variables.
      – Bernard
      Aug 20 at 9:33










      up vote
      4
      down vote













      Using multicols for this is not simple, because of various vertical skips that are added. I would suggest a couple of minipages:



      Sample output



      documentclassarticle

      usepackageamsmath,multicol

      begindocument

      Text
      begincenter
       beginminipage[b].45textwidth
       beginequation
       F_mathitbesch=m_mathitfzg cdot a_mathittrans
       labeleq:trans
       endequation
       endminipage
       quad
       beginminipage[b].45textwidth
       beginequation
       M_mathitbesch=sum_n=1^nJ_n cdot dotomega_n
       labeleq:rot
       endequation
       endminipage
      endcenter

      enddocument


      Notice the b alignment option to align baselines.



      I have also added mathit to your multi-letter supbscripts for better spacing; mathrm may be actually more appropriate depending on the context.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 1




        Is the center environment needed? For sure, it will add extra vertical padding, which may not be desirable?
        – Mico
        Aug 20 at 9:34






      • 1




        @Mico Depends on what alignment the OP wants. Less vertical space would be added by noindentbegintabularc...endtabular instead of begincenter...endcenter
        – Andrew Swann
        Aug 20 at 9:51














      up vote
      4
      down vote













      Using multicols for this is not simple, because of various vertical skips that are added. I would suggest a couple of minipages:



      Sample output



      documentclassarticle

      usepackageamsmath,multicol

      begindocument

      Text
      begincenter
       beginminipage[b].45textwidth
       beginequation
       F_mathitbesch=m_mathitfzg cdot a_mathittrans
       labeleq:trans
       endequation
       endminipage
       quad
       beginminipage[b].45textwidth
       beginequation
       M_mathitbesch=sum_n=1^nJ_n cdot dotomega_n
       labeleq:rot
       endequation
       endminipage
      endcenter

      enddocument


      Notice the b alignment option to align baselines.



      I have also added mathit to your multi-letter supbscripts for better spacing; mathrm may be actually more appropriate depending on the context.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 1




        Is the center environment needed? For sure, it will add extra vertical padding, which may not be desirable?
        – Mico
        Aug 20 at 9:34






      • 1




        @Mico Depends on what alignment the OP wants. Less vertical space would be added by noindentbegintabularc...endtabular instead of begincenter...endcenter
        – Andrew Swann
        Aug 20 at 9:51












      up vote
      4
      down vote










      up vote
      4
      down vote









      Using multicols for this is not simple, because of various vertical skips that are added. I would suggest a couple of minipages:



      Sample output



      documentclassarticle

      usepackageamsmath,multicol

      begindocument

      Text
      begincenter
       beginminipage[b].45textwidth
       beginequation
       F_mathitbesch=m_mathitfzg cdot a_mathittrans
       labeleq:trans
       endequation
       endminipage
       quad
       beginminipage[b].45textwidth
       beginequation
       M_mathitbesch=sum_n=1^nJ_n cdot dotomega_n
       labeleq:rot
       endequation
       endminipage
      endcenter

      enddocument


      Notice the b alignment option to align baselines.



      I have also added mathit to your multi-letter supbscripts for better spacing; mathrm may be actually more appropriate depending on the context.






      share|improve this answer














      Using multicols for this is not simple, because of various vertical skips that are added. I would suggest a couple of minipages:



      Sample output



      documentclassarticle

      usepackageamsmath,multicol

      begindocument

      Text
      begincenter
       beginminipage[b].45textwidth
       beginequation
       F_mathitbesch=m_mathitfzg cdot a_mathittrans
       labeleq:trans
       endequation
       endminipage
       quad
       beginminipage[b].45textwidth
       beginequation
       M_mathitbesch=sum_n=1^nJ_n cdot dotomega_n
       labeleq:rot
       endequation
       endminipage
      endcenter

      enddocument


      Notice the b alignment option to align baselines.



      I have also added mathit to your multi-letter supbscripts for better spacing; mathrm may be actually more appropriate depending on the context.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Aug 20 at 9:30

























      answered Aug 20 at 9:24









      Andrew Swann

      74.5k9123312




      74.5k9123312







      • 1




        Is the center environment needed? For sure, it will add extra vertical padding, which may not be desirable?
        – Mico
        Aug 20 at 9:34






      • 1




        @Mico Depends on what alignment the OP wants. Less vertical space would be added by noindentbegintabularc...endtabular instead of begincenter...endcenter
        – Andrew Swann
        Aug 20 at 9:51












      • 1




        Is the center environment needed? For sure, it will add extra vertical padding, which may not be desirable?
        – Mico
        Aug 20 at 9:34






      • 1




        @Mico Depends on what alignment the OP wants. Less vertical space would be added by noindentbegintabularc...endtabular instead of begincenter...endcenter
        – Andrew Swann
        Aug 20 at 9:51







      1




      1




      Is the center environment needed? For sure, it will add extra vertical padding, which may not be desirable?
      – Mico
      Aug 20 at 9:34




      Is the center environment needed? For sure, it will add extra vertical padding, which may not be desirable?
      – Mico
      Aug 20 at 9:34




      1




      1




      @Mico Depends on what alignment the OP wants. Less vertical space would be added by noindentbegintabularc...endtabular instead of begincenter...endcenter
      – Andrew Swann
      Aug 20 at 9:51




      @Mico Depends on what alignment the OP wants. Less vertical space would be added by noindentbegintabularc...endtabular instead of begincenter...endcenter
      – Andrew Swann
      Aug 20 at 9:51










      up vote
      4
      down vote













      I think you're abusing the multicols environment. Consider using two side-by-side minipage environments -- each of width 0.45textwidth -- instead.



      enter image description here



      documentclassarticle
      usepackage[utf8]inputenc
      usepackage[T1]fontenc
      usepackageamsmath
      numberwithinequationsection % just for this example
      newcommandvn[1]mathit#1 % to typeset variable names
      usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath % optional

      begindocument
      setcountersection2 % just for this example
      setcounterequation3 % just for this example

      hrule % just to illustrate width of text block
      noindent
      beginminipage0.45textwidth
       beginequation labeleq:trans
       F_vnbesch=m_vnfzg cdot a_vntrans
       vphantomsum_1^n % to balance heights of formulas across the equations
       endequation
      endminipage
      hfill % maximize horiz. separation between the 'minipage' environments
      beginminipage0.45textwidth
       beginequation labeleq:rot
       M_vnbesch=sum_n=1^n J_n cdot dotomega_n
       endequation
      endminipage
      enddocument





      share|improve this answer


























        up vote
        4
        down vote













        I think you're abusing the multicols environment. Consider using two side-by-side minipage environments -- each of width 0.45textwidth -- instead.



        enter image description here



        documentclassarticle
        usepackage[utf8]inputenc
        usepackage[T1]fontenc
        usepackageamsmath
        numberwithinequationsection % just for this example
        newcommandvn[1]mathit#1 % to typeset variable names
        usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath % optional

        begindocument
        setcountersection2 % just for this example
        setcounterequation3 % just for this example

        hrule % just to illustrate width of text block
        noindent
        beginminipage0.45textwidth
         beginequation labeleq:trans
         F_vnbesch=m_vnfzg cdot a_vntrans
         vphantomsum_1^n % to balance heights of formulas across the equations
         endequation
        endminipage
        hfill % maximize horiz. separation between the 'minipage' environments
        beginminipage0.45textwidth
         beginequation labeleq:rot
         M_vnbesch=sum_n=1^n J_n cdot dotomega_n
         endequation
        endminipage
        enddocument





        share|improve this answer
























          up vote
          4
          down vote










          up vote
          4
          down vote









          I think you're abusing the multicols environment. Consider using two side-by-side minipage environments -- each of width 0.45textwidth -- instead.



          enter image description here



          documentclassarticle
          usepackage[utf8]inputenc
          usepackage[T1]fontenc
          usepackageamsmath
          numberwithinequationsection % just for this example
          newcommandvn[1]mathit#1 % to typeset variable names
          usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath % optional

          begindocument
          setcountersection2 % just for this example
          setcounterequation3 % just for this example

          hrule % just to illustrate width of text block
          noindent
          beginminipage0.45textwidth
           beginequation labeleq:trans
           F_vnbesch=m_vnfzg cdot a_vntrans
           vphantomsum_1^n % to balance heights of formulas across the equations
           endequation
          endminipage
          hfill % maximize horiz. separation between the 'minipage' environments
          beginminipage0.45textwidth
           beginequation labeleq:rot
           M_vnbesch=sum_n=1^n J_n cdot dotomega_n
           endequation
          endminipage
          enddocument





          share|improve this answer














          I think you're abusing the multicols environment. Consider using two side-by-side minipage environments -- each of width 0.45textwidth -- instead.



          enter image description here



          documentclassarticle
          usepackage[utf8]inputenc
          usepackage[T1]fontenc
          usepackageamsmath
          numberwithinequationsection % just for this example
          newcommandvn[1]mathit#1 % to typeset variable names
          usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath % optional

          begindocument
          setcountersection2 % just for this example
          setcounterequation3 % just for this example

          hrule % just to illustrate width of text block
          noindent
          beginminipage0.45textwidth
           beginequation labeleq:trans
           F_vnbesch=m_vnfzg cdot a_vntrans
           vphantomsum_1^n % to balance heights of formulas across the equations
           endequation
          endminipage
          hfill % maximize horiz. separation between the 'minipage' environments
          beginminipage0.45textwidth
           beginequation labeleq:rot
           M_vnbesch=sum_n=1^n J_n cdot dotomega_n
           endequation
          endminipage
          enddocument






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Aug 20 at 9:32

























          answered Aug 20 at 9:21









          Mico

          261k30354729




          261k30354729




















              up vote
              4
              down vote













              I guess that you'd like to have just these two equations in parallel. For this, it is better suited to use a tabular environment with the m column type (from the package array):



              enter image description here



              (red lines indicate text borders)



              documentclassarticle
              usepackagearray

              begindocument
              noindent%
              begintabular@ *2mdimexpr0.5linewidth-tabcolsep @
               beginequation
               F_mathitbesch=m_mathitfzg cdot a_mathittrans
               labeleq:trans
               endequation
              &
               beginequation
               M_mathitbesch=sum_n=1^nJ_n cdot dotomega_n
               labeleq:rot
               endequation
              endtabular
              enddocument





              share|improve this answer


























                up vote
                4
                down vote













                I guess that you'd like to have just these two equations in parallel. For this, it is better suited to use a tabular environment with the m column type (from the package array):



                enter image description here



                (red lines indicate text borders)



                documentclassarticle
                usepackagearray

                begindocument
                noindent%
                begintabular@ *2mdimexpr0.5linewidth-tabcolsep @
                 beginequation
                 F_mathitbesch=m_mathitfzg cdot a_mathittrans
                 labeleq:trans
                 endequation
                &
                 beginequation
                 M_mathitbesch=sum_n=1^nJ_n cdot dotomega_n
                 labeleq:rot
                 endequation
                endtabular
                enddocument





                share|improve this answer
























                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote









                  I guess that you'd like to have just these two equations in parallel. For this, it is better suited to use a tabular environment with the m column type (from the package array):



                  enter image description here



                  (red lines indicate text borders)



                  documentclassarticle
                  usepackagearray

                  begindocument
                  noindent%
                  begintabular@ *2mdimexpr0.5linewidth-tabcolsep @
                   beginequation
                   F_mathitbesch=m_mathitfzg cdot a_mathittrans
                   labeleq:trans
                   endequation
                  &
                   beginequation
                   M_mathitbesch=sum_n=1^nJ_n cdot dotomega_n
                   labeleq:rot
                   endequation
                  endtabular
                  enddocument





                  share|improve this answer














                  I guess that you'd like to have just these two equations in parallel. For this, it is better suited to use a tabular environment with the m column type (from the package array):



                  enter image description here



                  (red lines indicate text borders)



                  documentclassarticle
                  usepackagearray

                  begindocument
                  noindent%
                  begintabular@ *2mdimexpr0.5linewidth-tabcolsep @
                   beginequation
                   F_mathitbesch=m_mathitfzg cdot a_mathittrans
                   labeleq:trans
                   endequation
                  &
                   beginequation
                   M_mathitbesch=sum_n=1^nJ_n cdot dotomega_n
                   labeleq:rot
                   endequation
                  endtabular
                  enddocument






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Aug 20 at 10:45









                  Bernard

                  155k762188




                  155k762188










                  answered Aug 20 at 9:20









                  Zarko

                  111k861148




                  111k861148






















                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded


























                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f446783%2fhow-do-i-align-equations-in-a-multicols-environment%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest
































































                      -

                      這個網誌中的熱門文章

                      How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                      圖片
                      Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite My aim is to smooth the terrain in a video game. Therefore I contrived an algorithm that makes use of Bézier curves of different orders. But this algorithm is defined in a two dimensional space for now. To shift it into the third dimension I need to somehow combine the Bézier curves. Given two curves in each two dimensions, how can I combine them to build a surface? I thought about something like a curve of a curve. Or maybe I could multiply them somehow. How can I combine them to cause the wanted behavior? Is there a common approach? In the image you can see the input, on the left, and the output, on the right, of the algorithm that works in a two dimensional space. For the real application there is a three dimensional input. The algorithm relays only on the adjacent tiles. Given these it will define the control points of the mentioned Bézier cur...
                      閱讀完整內容

                      Propositional logic and tautologies

                      圖片
                      Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 0 down vote favorite Taken from P. Suppes "Introduction to logic" pp16 Starting from the sentence "If $P$ tautologically implies $Q$, then.." Question: Is it true that, at least within propositional logic, we are able to prove only tautologies or do I mis-understand something? If yes, is propositional logic special in some way? Is the notion of tautology meaningful only in propositional logic? logic propositional-calculus share | cite | improve this question edited Nov 29 '17 at 18:53 Mauro ALLEGRANZA 60.8k 4 46 105 asked Nov 29 '17 at 16:32 Alvin Lepik 2,448 9 20 add a comment  |  up vote 0 down vote favorite Taken from P. Suppes "Introduction to logic" pp16 Starting from the sentence "If $P$ tautologically implies $Q$, then.." Question: Is it true that, at least within propositional logic, we are able to prove only tautologi...
                      閱讀完整內容

                      Distribution of Stopped Wiener Process with Stochastic Volatility

                      圖片
                      Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 0 down vote favorite Let $(W_s)_s geq 0$ be a Wiener process and $tau$ be a random variable with an exponential distribution with parameter $lambda$. Suppose that $W$ and $tau$ are independent. In this question, we see that the distribution of the stopped Wiener process $W_tau$ corresponds to a Laplace distribution with scale parameter $fracsigmasqrt2lambda$ where $sigma$ is the instantaneous variance of the Wiener process. Suppose now, that the variance $sigma^2$ also follows a stochastic process such that we have: $$dS = sigma SdW_s \ dsigma^2 = alphasigma^2dt + xisigma^2dW_sigma$$ where $alpha$ and $xi$ are independent of $S$ and $dW_s$ and $dW_sigma$ are independent Wiener processes. My aim is to derive the distribution of $log S_tau$. First, if $barV_T$ denotes the mean variance over some time interval $[0,T]$ defined by $$barV_T = frac1T intlimits_0^Tsigma^2(t)dt,$$ it is easy to show (Lemma of Îto) that $$...
                      閱讀完整內容