Measure-preserving transformations
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
In the following image the last line why does the measure of the set $G$ equal $1$ ?
general-topology measure-theory proof-explanation intuition ergodic-theory
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
In the following image the last line why does the measure of the set $G$ equal $1$ ?
general-topology measure-theory proof-explanation intuition ergodic-theory
Continuity of measure.
â fourierwho
May 19 at 23:28
@fourierwho how please ?
â Neil hawking
May 19 at 23:32
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
In the following image the last line why does the measure of the set $G$ equal $1$ ?
general-topology measure-theory proof-explanation intuition ergodic-theory
In the following image the last line why does the measure of the set $G$ equal $1$ ?
general-topology measure-theory proof-explanation intuition ergodic-theory
edited Aug 20 at 10:27
asked May 19 at 23:23
Neil hawking
36819
36819
Continuity of measure.
â fourierwho
May 19 at 23:28
@fourierwho how please ?
â Neil hawking
May 19 at 23:32
add a comment |Â
Continuity of measure.
â fourierwho
May 19 at 23:28
@fourierwho how please ?
â Neil hawking
May 19 at 23:32
Continuity of measure.
â fourierwho
May 19 at 23:28
Continuity of measure.
â fourierwho
May 19 at 23:28
@fourierwho how please ?
â Neil hawking
May 19 at 23:32
@fourierwho how please ?
â Neil hawking
May 19 at 23:32
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The text defines $G$ as $G = bigcap_n = 1^infty G_n$, where $G_n = bigcup_k = 0^infty xi^-k(V_n)$. It is therein proved that $mu(G_n) = 1$. Recall that if $A$ and $B$ are events/measurable sets and $mu(A) = mu(B) = 1$, then $mu(A cap B) = 1$. Thus, for each $N in mathbbN$, $mu(G_1 cap dots cap G_N) = 1$ (by induction). Therefore, by continuity of measure,
beginequation*
mu(G) = lim_N to infty mu(G_1 cap dots cap G_N) = 1.
endequation*
Thanks merci danke
â Neil hawking
May 19 at 23:45
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The text defines $G$ as $G = bigcap_n = 1^infty G_n$, where $G_n = bigcup_k = 0^infty xi^-k(V_n)$. It is therein proved that $mu(G_n) = 1$. Recall that if $A$ and $B$ are events/measurable sets and $mu(A) = mu(B) = 1$, then $mu(A cap B) = 1$. Thus, for each $N in mathbbN$, $mu(G_1 cap dots cap G_N) = 1$ (by induction). Therefore, by continuity of measure,
beginequation*
mu(G) = lim_N to infty mu(G_1 cap dots cap G_N) = 1.
endequation*
Thanks merci danke
â Neil hawking
May 19 at 23:45
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The text defines $G$ as $G = bigcap_n = 1^infty G_n$, where $G_n = bigcup_k = 0^infty xi^-k(V_n)$. It is therein proved that $mu(G_n) = 1$. Recall that if $A$ and $B$ are events/measurable sets and $mu(A) = mu(B) = 1$, then $mu(A cap B) = 1$. Thus, for each $N in mathbbN$, $mu(G_1 cap dots cap G_N) = 1$ (by induction). Therefore, by continuity of measure,
beginequation*
mu(G) = lim_N to infty mu(G_1 cap dots cap G_N) = 1.
endequation*
Thanks merci danke
â Neil hawking
May 19 at 23:45
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The text defines $G$ as $G = bigcap_n = 1^infty G_n$, where $G_n = bigcup_k = 0^infty xi^-k(V_n)$. It is therein proved that $mu(G_n) = 1$. Recall that if $A$ and $B$ are events/measurable sets and $mu(A) = mu(B) = 1$, then $mu(A cap B) = 1$. Thus, for each $N in mathbbN$, $mu(G_1 cap dots cap G_N) = 1$ (by induction). Therefore, by continuity of measure,
beginequation*
mu(G) = lim_N to infty mu(G_1 cap dots cap G_N) = 1.
endequation*
The text defines $G$ as $G = bigcap_n = 1^infty G_n$, where $G_n = bigcup_k = 0^infty xi^-k(V_n)$. It is therein proved that $mu(G_n) = 1$. Recall that if $A$ and $B$ are events/measurable sets and $mu(A) = mu(B) = 1$, then $mu(A cap B) = 1$. Thus, for each $N in mathbbN$, $mu(G_1 cap dots cap G_N) = 1$ (by induction). Therefore, by continuity of measure,
beginequation*
mu(G) = lim_N to infty mu(G_1 cap dots cap G_N) = 1.
endequation*
answered May 19 at 23:35
fourierwho
2,396613
2,396613
Thanks merci danke
â Neil hawking
May 19 at 23:45
add a comment |Â
Thanks merci danke
â Neil hawking
May 19 at 23:45
Thanks merci danke
â Neil hawking
May 19 at 23:45
Thanks merci danke
â Neil hawking
May 19 at 23:45
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2788050%2fmeasure-preserving-transformations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Continuity of measure.
â fourierwho
May 19 at 23:28
@fourierwho how please ?
â Neil hawking
May 19 at 23:32