Measure-preserving transformations

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












In the following image the last line why does the measure of the set $G$ equal $1$ ?enter image description here







share|cite|improve this question






















  • Continuity of measure.
    – fourierwho
    May 19 at 23:28










  • @fourierwho how please ?
    – Neil hawking
    May 19 at 23:32














up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












In the following image the last line why does the measure of the set $G$ equal $1$ ?enter image description here







share|cite|improve this question






















  • Continuity of measure.
    – fourierwho
    May 19 at 23:28










  • @fourierwho how please ?
    – Neil hawking
    May 19 at 23:32












up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1






1





In the following image the last line why does the measure of the set $G$ equal $1$ ?enter image description here







share|cite|improve this question














In the following image the last line why does the measure of the set $G$ equal $1$ ?enter image description here









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 20 at 10:27

























asked May 19 at 23:23









Neil hawking

36819




36819











  • Continuity of measure.
    – fourierwho
    May 19 at 23:28










  • @fourierwho how please ?
    – Neil hawking
    May 19 at 23:32
















  • Continuity of measure.
    – fourierwho
    May 19 at 23:28










  • @fourierwho how please ?
    – Neil hawking
    May 19 at 23:32















Continuity of measure.
– fourierwho
May 19 at 23:28




Continuity of measure.
– fourierwho
May 19 at 23:28












@fourierwho how please ?
– Neil hawking
May 19 at 23:32




@fourierwho how please ?
– Neil hawking
May 19 at 23:32










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










The text defines $G$ as $G = bigcap_n = 1^infty G_n$, where $G_n = bigcup_k = 0^infty xi^-k(V_n)$. It is therein proved that $mu(G_n) = 1$. Recall that if $A$ and $B$ are events/measurable sets and $mu(A) = mu(B) = 1$, then $mu(A cap B) = 1$. Thus, for each $N in mathbbN$, $mu(G_1 cap dots cap G_N) = 1$ (by induction). Therefore, by continuity of measure,
beginequation*
mu(G) = lim_N to infty mu(G_1 cap dots cap G_N) = 1.
endequation*






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Thanks merci danke
    – Neil hawking
    May 19 at 23:45










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2788050%2fmeasure-preserving-transformations%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










The text defines $G$ as $G = bigcap_n = 1^infty G_n$, where $G_n = bigcup_k = 0^infty xi^-k(V_n)$. It is therein proved that $mu(G_n) = 1$. Recall that if $A$ and $B$ are events/measurable sets and $mu(A) = mu(B) = 1$, then $mu(A cap B) = 1$. Thus, for each $N in mathbbN$, $mu(G_1 cap dots cap G_N) = 1$ (by induction). Therefore, by continuity of measure,
beginequation*
mu(G) = lim_N to infty mu(G_1 cap dots cap G_N) = 1.
endequation*






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Thanks merci danke
    – Neil hawking
    May 19 at 23:45














up vote
2
down vote



accepted










The text defines $G$ as $G = bigcap_n = 1^infty G_n$, where $G_n = bigcup_k = 0^infty xi^-k(V_n)$. It is therein proved that $mu(G_n) = 1$. Recall that if $A$ and $B$ are events/measurable sets and $mu(A) = mu(B) = 1$, then $mu(A cap B) = 1$. Thus, for each $N in mathbbN$, $mu(G_1 cap dots cap G_N) = 1$ (by induction). Therefore, by continuity of measure,
beginequation*
mu(G) = lim_N to infty mu(G_1 cap dots cap G_N) = 1.
endequation*






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Thanks merci danke
    – Neil hawking
    May 19 at 23:45












up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






The text defines $G$ as $G = bigcap_n = 1^infty G_n$, where $G_n = bigcup_k = 0^infty xi^-k(V_n)$. It is therein proved that $mu(G_n) = 1$. Recall that if $A$ and $B$ are events/measurable sets and $mu(A) = mu(B) = 1$, then $mu(A cap B) = 1$. Thus, for each $N in mathbbN$, $mu(G_1 cap dots cap G_N) = 1$ (by induction). Therefore, by continuity of measure,
beginequation*
mu(G) = lim_N to infty mu(G_1 cap dots cap G_N) = 1.
endequation*






share|cite|improve this answer












The text defines $G$ as $G = bigcap_n = 1^infty G_n$, where $G_n = bigcup_k = 0^infty xi^-k(V_n)$. It is therein proved that $mu(G_n) = 1$. Recall that if $A$ and $B$ are events/measurable sets and $mu(A) = mu(B) = 1$, then $mu(A cap B) = 1$. Thus, for each $N in mathbbN$, $mu(G_1 cap dots cap G_N) = 1$ (by induction). Therefore, by continuity of measure,
beginequation*
mu(G) = lim_N to infty mu(G_1 cap dots cap G_N) = 1.
endequation*







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered May 19 at 23:35









fourierwho

2,396613




2,396613











  • Thanks merci danke
    – Neil hawking
    May 19 at 23:45
















  • Thanks merci danke
    – Neil hawking
    May 19 at 23:45















Thanks merci danke
– Neil hawking
May 19 at 23:45




Thanks merci danke
– Neil hawking
May 19 at 23:45












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2788050%2fmeasure-preserving-transformations%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Mutual Information Always Non-negative

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?