A sequence of norm 1 converging weakly under weakly compact operator

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $X,Y$ be Banach spaces and $T : X rightarrow Y$ a bounded operator that is weakly compact.



How to prove that there exists $epsilon > 0$ and a sequence $(x_n)_n subset X$ such that $|x_n| = 1, |T(x_n)| geq epsilon$ forall $n in mathbb N$, and the sequence $(T(x_n))_n$ is congerging weakly to $0$ ?



All what I can say is that I can extract a subsequence from $(Tx_n)_n$ which converges to a $y in Y$.



Thanks for any help







share|cite|improve this question




















  • I'm not sure you always can. In $Y=ell_1$, a sequence is weakly null if and only if it is norm null.
    – David Mitra
    Aug 20 at 13:09











  • Thank you David. This assersion was used in a paper wrote by William B. Johnson : eudml.org/doc/266092 (just under the first theorem in the first page). I ask my question here because I don't understand the reasons why this can be true.
    – Kébir J
    Aug 20 at 13:50










  • There, it's assumed that $T$ is not compact. Can you deduce your result with that in mind?
    – David Mitra
    Aug 20 at 13:59











  • I suppose I can extract a subsequence for which $|(T(x_n))_n$ is decreasing. Then I extract a sequence weakly-convergent.
    – Kébir J
    Aug 20 at 14:23














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $X,Y$ be Banach spaces and $T : X rightarrow Y$ a bounded operator that is weakly compact.



How to prove that there exists $epsilon > 0$ and a sequence $(x_n)_n subset X$ such that $|x_n| = 1, |T(x_n)| geq epsilon$ forall $n in mathbb N$, and the sequence $(T(x_n))_n$ is congerging weakly to $0$ ?



All what I can say is that I can extract a subsequence from $(Tx_n)_n$ which converges to a $y in Y$.



Thanks for any help







share|cite|improve this question




















  • I'm not sure you always can. In $Y=ell_1$, a sequence is weakly null if and only if it is norm null.
    – David Mitra
    Aug 20 at 13:09











  • Thank you David. This assersion was used in a paper wrote by William B. Johnson : eudml.org/doc/266092 (just under the first theorem in the first page). I ask my question here because I don't understand the reasons why this can be true.
    – Kébir J
    Aug 20 at 13:50










  • There, it's assumed that $T$ is not compact. Can you deduce your result with that in mind?
    – David Mitra
    Aug 20 at 13:59











  • I suppose I can extract a subsequence for which $|(T(x_n))_n$ is decreasing. Then I extract a sequence weakly-convergent.
    – Kébir J
    Aug 20 at 14:23












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Let $X,Y$ be Banach spaces and $T : X rightarrow Y$ a bounded operator that is weakly compact.



How to prove that there exists $epsilon > 0$ and a sequence $(x_n)_n subset X$ such that $|x_n| = 1, |T(x_n)| geq epsilon$ forall $n in mathbb N$, and the sequence $(T(x_n))_n$ is congerging weakly to $0$ ?



All what I can say is that I can extract a subsequence from $(Tx_n)_n$ which converges to a $y in Y$.



Thanks for any help







share|cite|improve this question












Let $X,Y$ be Banach spaces and $T : X rightarrow Y$ a bounded operator that is weakly compact.



How to prove that there exists $epsilon > 0$ and a sequence $(x_n)_n subset X$ such that $|x_n| = 1, |T(x_n)| geq epsilon$ forall $n in mathbb N$, and the sequence $(T(x_n))_n$ is congerging weakly to $0$ ?



All what I can say is that I can extract a subsequence from $(Tx_n)_n$ which converges to a $y in Y$.



Thanks for any help









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 20 at 13:01









Kébir J

255




255











  • I'm not sure you always can. In $Y=ell_1$, a sequence is weakly null if and only if it is norm null.
    – David Mitra
    Aug 20 at 13:09











  • Thank you David. This assersion was used in a paper wrote by William B. Johnson : eudml.org/doc/266092 (just under the first theorem in the first page). I ask my question here because I don't understand the reasons why this can be true.
    – Kébir J
    Aug 20 at 13:50










  • There, it's assumed that $T$ is not compact. Can you deduce your result with that in mind?
    – David Mitra
    Aug 20 at 13:59











  • I suppose I can extract a subsequence for which $|(T(x_n))_n$ is decreasing. Then I extract a sequence weakly-convergent.
    – Kébir J
    Aug 20 at 14:23
















  • I'm not sure you always can. In $Y=ell_1$, a sequence is weakly null if and only if it is norm null.
    – David Mitra
    Aug 20 at 13:09











  • Thank you David. This assersion was used in a paper wrote by William B. Johnson : eudml.org/doc/266092 (just under the first theorem in the first page). I ask my question here because I don't understand the reasons why this can be true.
    – Kébir J
    Aug 20 at 13:50










  • There, it's assumed that $T$ is not compact. Can you deduce your result with that in mind?
    – David Mitra
    Aug 20 at 13:59











  • I suppose I can extract a subsequence for which $|(T(x_n))_n$ is decreasing. Then I extract a sequence weakly-convergent.
    – Kébir J
    Aug 20 at 14:23















I'm not sure you always can. In $Y=ell_1$, a sequence is weakly null if and only if it is norm null.
– David Mitra
Aug 20 at 13:09





I'm not sure you always can. In $Y=ell_1$, a sequence is weakly null if and only if it is norm null.
– David Mitra
Aug 20 at 13:09













Thank you David. This assersion was used in a paper wrote by William B. Johnson : eudml.org/doc/266092 (just under the first theorem in the first page). I ask my question here because I don't understand the reasons why this can be true.
– Kébir J
Aug 20 at 13:50




Thank you David. This assersion was used in a paper wrote by William B. Johnson : eudml.org/doc/266092 (just under the first theorem in the first page). I ask my question here because I don't understand the reasons why this can be true.
– Kébir J
Aug 20 at 13:50












There, it's assumed that $T$ is not compact. Can you deduce your result with that in mind?
– David Mitra
Aug 20 at 13:59





There, it's assumed that $T$ is not compact. Can you deduce your result with that in mind?
– David Mitra
Aug 20 at 13:59













I suppose I can extract a subsequence for which $|(T(x_n))_n$ is decreasing. Then I extract a sequence weakly-convergent.
– Kébir J
Aug 20 at 14:23




I suppose I can extract a subsequence for which $|(T(x_n))_n$ is decreasing. Then I extract a sequence weakly-convergent.
– Kébir J
Aug 20 at 14:23










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










As in the paper you referenced in the comments, we'll assume $T$ is not compact.



Then, we may (and do) choose a sequence $(x_n)_n$ in $S_X$ such that
no subsequence of $(Tx_n)_n$ is norm convergent. Now choose a subsequence $(x_n_k)_k$ of $(x_n)_n$ so that $(T x_n_k)_k$ is weakly convergent.



Now, $(T x_n_k)_k$ is not norm-Cauchy. So we find $epsilon>0$ and subsequences $(p_k)$ and $(q_k)$ of $(n_k)$ with



$$Vert T( x_p_k- x_q_k)Vert>epsilon,quad k=1,2,ldots.tag1$$

Set $y_k= x_p_k- x_q_k$.



Then $(Ty_k)$ is weakly null (since $(T(x_n_k))_k$ is weakly convergent).



Since $T$ is bounded and since (1) holds, it follows that $(Vert y_kVert)_k$ is bounded away from $0$. From this, it follows that $bigl(T( y_k/Vert y_kVert)bigr)_k$ is weakly null. Appealing to (1) again, $biglVert T(y_k/Vert y_k Vert)bigrVert>epsilon/2 $ for each $k$.



So, $(y_k/Vert y_kVert)$ is the sought after sequence.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Thank you. I was very very far from this.
    – Kébir J
    Aug 20 at 16:48










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2888759%2fa-sequence-of-norm-1-converging-weakly-under-weakly-compact-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










As in the paper you referenced in the comments, we'll assume $T$ is not compact.



Then, we may (and do) choose a sequence $(x_n)_n$ in $S_X$ such that
no subsequence of $(Tx_n)_n$ is norm convergent. Now choose a subsequence $(x_n_k)_k$ of $(x_n)_n$ so that $(T x_n_k)_k$ is weakly convergent.



Now, $(T x_n_k)_k$ is not norm-Cauchy. So we find $epsilon>0$ and subsequences $(p_k)$ and $(q_k)$ of $(n_k)$ with



$$Vert T( x_p_k- x_q_k)Vert>epsilon,quad k=1,2,ldots.tag1$$

Set $y_k= x_p_k- x_q_k$.



Then $(Ty_k)$ is weakly null (since $(T(x_n_k))_k$ is weakly convergent).



Since $T$ is bounded and since (1) holds, it follows that $(Vert y_kVert)_k$ is bounded away from $0$. From this, it follows that $bigl(T( y_k/Vert y_kVert)bigr)_k$ is weakly null. Appealing to (1) again, $biglVert T(y_k/Vert y_k Vert)bigrVert>epsilon/2 $ for each $k$.



So, $(y_k/Vert y_kVert)$ is the sought after sequence.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Thank you. I was very very far from this.
    – Kébir J
    Aug 20 at 16:48














up vote
1
down vote



accepted










As in the paper you referenced in the comments, we'll assume $T$ is not compact.



Then, we may (and do) choose a sequence $(x_n)_n$ in $S_X$ such that
no subsequence of $(Tx_n)_n$ is norm convergent. Now choose a subsequence $(x_n_k)_k$ of $(x_n)_n$ so that $(T x_n_k)_k$ is weakly convergent.



Now, $(T x_n_k)_k$ is not norm-Cauchy. So we find $epsilon>0$ and subsequences $(p_k)$ and $(q_k)$ of $(n_k)$ with



$$Vert T( x_p_k- x_q_k)Vert>epsilon,quad k=1,2,ldots.tag1$$

Set $y_k= x_p_k- x_q_k$.



Then $(Ty_k)$ is weakly null (since $(T(x_n_k))_k$ is weakly convergent).



Since $T$ is bounded and since (1) holds, it follows that $(Vert y_kVert)_k$ is bounded away from $0$. From this, it follows that $bigl(T( y_k/Vert y_kVert)bigr)_k$ is weakly null. Appealing to (1) again, $biglVert T(y_k/Vert y_k Vert)bigrVert>epsilon/2 $ for each $k$.



So, $(y_k/Vert y_kVert)$ is the sought after sequence.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Thank you. I was very very far from this.
    – Kébir J
    Aug 20 at 16:48












up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






As in the paper you referenced in the comments, we'll assume $T$ is not compact.



Then, we may (and do) choose a sequence $(x_n)_n$ in $S_X$ such that
no subsequence of $(Tx_n)_n$ is norm convergent. Now choose a subsequence $(x_n_k)_k$ of $(x_n)_n$ so that $(T x_n_k)_k$ is weakly convergent.



Now, $(T x_n_k)_k$ is not norm-Cauchy. So we find $epsilon>0$ and subsequences $(p_k)$ and $(q_k)$ of $(n_k)$ with



$$Vert T( x_p_k- x_q_k)Vert>epsilon,quad k=1,2,ldots.tag1$$

Set $y_k= x_p_k- x_q_k$.



Then $(Ty_k)$ is weakly null (since $(T(x_n_k))_k$ is weakly convergent).



Since $T$ is bounded and since (1) holds, it follows that $(Vert y_kVert)_k$ is bounded away from $0$. From this, it follows that $bigl(T( y_k/Vert y_kVert)bigr)_k$ is weakly null. Appealing to (1) again, $biglVert T(y_k/Vert y_k Vert)bigrVert>epsilon/2 $ for each $k$.



So, $(y_k/Vert y_kVert)$ is the sought after sequence.






share|cite|improve this answer












As in the paper you referenced in the comments, we'll assume $T$ is not compact.



Then, we may (and do) choose a sequence $(x_n)_n$ in $S_X$ such that
no subsequence of $(Tx_n)_n$ is norm convergent. Now choose a subsequence $(x_n_k)_k$ of $(x_n)_n$ so that $(T x_n_k)_k$ is weakly convergent.



Now, $(T x_n_k)_k$ is not norm-Cauchy. So we find $epsilon>0$ and subsequences $(p_k)$ and $(q_k)$ of $(n_k)$ with



$$Vert T( x_p_k- x_q_k)Vert>epsilon,quad k=1,2,ldots.tag1$$

Set $y_k= x_p_k- x_q_k$.



Then $(Ty_k)$ is weakly null (since $(T(x_n_k))_k$ is weakly convergent).



Since $T$ is bounded and since (1) holds, it follows that $(Vert y_kVert)_k$ is bounded away from $0$. From this, it follows that $bigl(T( y_k/Vert y_kVert)bigr)_k$ is weakly null. Appealing to (1) again, $biglVert T(y_k/Vert y_k Vert)bigrVert>epsilon/2 $ for each $k$.



So, $(y_k/Vert y_kVert)$ is the sought after sequence.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Aug 20 at 15:52









David Mitra

61.9k694157




61.9k694157











  • Thank you. I was very very far from this.
    – Kébir J
    Aug 20 at 16:48
















  • Thank you. I was very very far from this.
    – Kébir J
    Aug 20 at 16:48















Thank you. I was very very far from this.
– Kébir J
Aug 20 at 16:48




Thank you. I was very very far from this.
– Kébir J
Aug 20 at 16:48












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2888759%2fa-sequence-of-norm-1-converging-weakly-under-weakly-compact-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?