Online reference to AA.i.254

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I'm looking for an online reference to AA.i.254 mention at the bottom of this page:




No woman can become a Cakka-vatti (the reasons for this are given at AA.i.254).




Either an English or Sinhala translation would be preferable










share|improve this question



















  • 2




    Per the List of Abbreviations, "AA" might be "Manorathapūranī, Anguttara Commentary, 2 vols. (S.H.B.)."
    – ChrisW♦
    Sep 9 at 8:18














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I'm looking for an online reference to AA.i.254 mention at the bottom of this page:




No woman can become a Cakka-vatti (the reasons for this are given at AA.i.254).




Either an English or Sinhala translation would be preferable










share|improve this question



















  • 2




    Per the List of Abbreviations, "AA" might be "Manorathapūranī, Anguttara Commentary, 2 vols. (S.H.B.)."
    – ChrisW♦
    Sep 9 at 8:18












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











I'm looking for an online reference to AA.i.254 mention at the bottom of this page:




No woman can become a Cakka-vatti (the reasons for this are given at AA.i.254).




Either an English or Sinhala translation would be preferable










share|improve this question















I'm looking for an online reference to AA.i.254 mention at the bottom of this page:




No woman can become a Cakka-vatti (the reasons for this are given at AA.i.254).




Either an English or Sinhala translation would be preferable







reference-request






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 9 at 8:37

























asked Sep 9 at 7:59









Sankha Kulathantille

22.5k11453




22.5k11453







  • 2




    Per the List of Abbreviations, "AA" might be "Manorathapūranī, Anguttara Commentary, 2 vols. (S.H.B.)."
    – ChrisW♦
    Sep 9 at 8:18












  • 2




    Per the List of Abbreviations, "AA" might be "Manorathapūranī, Anguttara Commentary, 2 vols. (S.H.B.)."
    – ChrisW♦
    Sep 9 at 8:18







2




2




Per the List of Abbreviations, "AA" might be "Manorathapūranī, Anguttara Commentary, 2 vols. (S.H.B.)."
– ChrisW♦
Sep 9 at 8:18




Per the List of Abbreviations, "AA" might be "Manorathapūranī, Anguttara Commentary, 2 vols. (S.H.B.)."
– ChrisW♦
Sep 9 at 8:18










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













Per the List of Abbreviations, "AA" might be "Manorathapūranī, Anguttara Commentary, 2 vols. (S.H.B.)."



This catalog claims that:



  • The editions are mostly Print books (English or Pali)

  • There are some eBooks in Pali from the PTS

I don't know that (I doubt whether, but I haven't searched) there's an edition free online.



Google Books shows a limited preview of e.g. the Pali eBooks (e.g. here).






share|improve this answer




















  • It'd be convenient to have an online link, if not i'll check it out the next time I visit a library. Thanks anyways!
    – Sankha Kulathantille
    Sep 9 at 13:35










  • Can you try using a Sinhalese search term? That might find something that I couldn't.
    – ChrisW♦
    Sep 9 at 21:28










  • The Sinhalese term is 'මනෝරථපූරනී', but there are no downloadable versions
    – Sankha Kulathantille
    Sep 10 at 2:51

















up vote
0
down vote













Sutta. Ma. U. Papañcasūdanī-Atthakatha, Bahudhātukasuttavaṇṇanā's translation :




The description of "It is impossible that a woman should be the Universal Monarch": Because the woman can't grow with The Thirty Two Marks of a Great Man, such as Phimosis, etc. The woman can't has seven gems, such as woman-gem (the precious woman). The woman's body can't be the biggest body of all human. So, Buddha said " It is impossible that a woman should be the Universal Monarch".





Actually, I don't want to answer like below because the feminists have resisted me before on my reply of some topic like this. I never want to attack anyone, buddha as well.



Sutta. Ma. U. Bahudhātukasuttaṃ:




Whatever fears, misfortunes and dangers arise, they all arise from the foolish not from the wise ... Therefore bhikkhus, to become wise inquirers, you should train thus.



...



“Venerable sir, saying it rightly how is the bhikkhu clever in the possible and impossible.” ... It is impossible that a woman should be the Universal Monarch It is possible that a man should be the Universal Monarch.



...



“Ānanda, call it, the Discourse on many elements, or The fourfold circle, or The mirror of the Teaching, or The drum of deathlessness, or The noble victory in the battle.”




That context is the same of Sun Tzu's clauses:




if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle.




The context is about the best no.1 winner (cakka-vatti/buddha/arahanta/etc.,) vs the ordinary (the follower). So, we have to look about the qualification of the best no.1 winner.



Remember: Buddhism never against female to be the best, if everything (everything is everything, everything is not something) of them can compare to the male. But by the science, history, environment, etc., it is quite harder than the male.



So, what is the qualification of the best no.1 winner?



  1. The best physical body.

  2. The best I.Q.

  3. The best E.Q.

  4. The best M.Q.

  5. The best Teacher.

  6. The best practice.

  7. The best effort.

  8. The best environment.

  9. Etc.

Then answer me for these questions to get the answer of this topic:



Don't let me answer it by myself, because I can be killed by the feminists.



  1. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best physical body compare to the other period of month?

  2. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best I.Q. compare to the other period of month?

  3. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best E.Q. compare to the other period of month?

  4. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best M.Q. compare to the other period of month?

  5. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best Teacher compare to the other period of month?

  6. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best practice compare to the other period of month?

  7. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best effort compare to the other period of month?

  8. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best environment compare to the other period of month?


  9. How many time of a life, that the male has bloody period?

  10. How are the patients feeling when they lost their nutriment for bloody lesion? While this situation, how are their I.Q., E.Q., M.Q., effort, etc.?

  11. How are the patients feeling when they stomachache by the bloody intestine? While this situation, how are their I.Q., E.Q., M.Q., effort, etc.?

  12. How the doctors, psychiatrist, etc., answer my question?

  13. Why Olympic separates the female competition from the male competition?

  14. Etc.

Remember: Buddhism never against female to be the best, if everything (everything is everything, everything is not something) of them can compare to the male. But by the science, history, environment, etc., it is quite harder than the male.




Actually, it is from tipitaka, Sutta. Ma. U. Bahudhātukasuttaṃ , not atthakatha:




It is impossible that a woman should be the Universal Monarch It is possible that a man should be the Universal Monarch.




It is from Mahidol University Application Budsir The Pali Tipitaka in Roman Character Volume 20 page 36-37.



http://www.84000.org/tipitaka/read/roman_read.php?B=20&A=738



Click here for these versions of this sutta: Siamrattha(THAI), Mahaculalonkorn University, Atthakatha Pali, and Thai translation of Atthakatha by Mahamakut University.






share|improve this answer


















  • 2




    It says "the reasons for this are given at AA.i.254". But Bahudhātuka sutta merely repeats the statement. Reasons are not given. I'm guessing the reasons/explanation is in the commentary.
    – Sankha Kulathantille
    Sep 9 at 13:31






  • 1




    I think the OP's question is not about the sutta, but about the reasons for that a woman can't be a universal monarch. And, apparently those reasons are given in AA.i.254, not the sutta itself.
    – Medhiṇī
    Sep 9 at 13:32










  • @Sankha Kulathantille Is it better?
    – Bonn
    Sep 10 at 4:10










  • @Bonn I'm looking for a reference of AA.i.254. Possibly an English translation of the Pali commentary. Not personal opinions.
    – Sankha Kulathantille
    Sep 10 at 4:42






  • 1




    See also Can the Buddha ever be a woman?
    – ChrisW♦
    Sep 10 at 8:27










Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "565"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbuddhism.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29150%2fonline-reference-to-aa-i-254%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote













Per the List of Abbreviations, "AA" might be "Manorathapūranī, Anguttara Commentary, 2 vols. (S.H.B.)."



This catalog claims that:



  • The editions are mostly Print books (English or Pali)

  • There are some eBooks in Pali from the PTS

I don't know that (I doubt whether, but I haven't searched) there's an edition free online.



Google Books shows a limited preview of e.g. the Pali eBooks (e.g. here).






share|improve this answer




















  • It'd be convenient to have an online link, if not i'll check it out the next time I visit a library. Thanks anyways!
    – Sankha Kulathantille
    Sep 9 at 13:35










  • Can you try using a Sinhalese search term? That might find something that I couldn't.
    – ChrisW♦
    Sep 9 at 21:28










  • The Sinhalese term is 'මනෝරථපූරනී', but there are no downloadable versions
    – Sankha Kulathantille
    Sep 10 at 2:51














up vote
2
down vote













Per the List of Abbreviations, "AA" might be "Manorathapūranī, Anguttara Commentary, 2 vols. (S.H.B.)."



This catalog claims that:



  • The editions are mostly Print books (English or Pali)

  • There are some eBooks in Pali from the PTS

I don't know that (I doubt whether, but I haven't searched) there's an edition free online.



Google Books shows a limited preview of e.g. the Pali eBooks (e.g. here).






share|improve this answer




















  • It'd be convenient to have an online link, if not i'll check it out the next time I visit a library. Thanks anyways!
    – Sankha Kulathantille
    Sep 9 at 13:35










  • Can you try using a Sinhalese search term? That might find something that I couldn't.
    – ChrisW♦
    Sep 9 at 21:28










  • The Sinhalese term is 'මනෝරථපූරනී', but there are no downloadable versions
    – Sankha Kulathantille
    Sep 10 at 2:51












up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









Per the List of Abbreviations, "AA" might be "Manorathapūranī, Anguttara Commentary, 2 vols. (S.H.B.)."



This catalog claims that:



  • The editions are mostly Print books (English or Pali)

  • There are some eBooks in Pali from the PTS

I don't know that (I doubt whether, but I haven't searched) there's an edition free online.



Google Books shows a limited preview of e.g. the Pali eBooks (e.g. here).






share|improve this answer












Per the List of Abbreviations, "AA" might be "Manorathapūranī, Anguttara Commentary, 2 vols. (S.H.B.)."



This catalog claims that:



  • The editions are mostly Print books (English or Pali)

  • There are some eBooks in Pali from the PTS

I don't know that (I doubt whether, but I haven't searched) there's an edition free online.



Google Books shows a limited preview of e.g. the Pali eBooks (e.g. here).







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Sep 9 at 9:25









ChrisW♦

27.5k42383




27.5k42383











  • It'd be convenient to have an online link, if not i'll check it out the next time I visit a library. Thanks anyways!
    – Sankha Kulathantille
    Sep 9 at 13:35










  • Can you try using a Sinhalese search term? That might find something that I couldn't.
    – ChrisW♦
    Sep 9 at 21:28










  • The Sinhalese term is 'මනෝරථපූරනී', but there are no downloadable versions
    – Sankha Kulathantille
    Sep 10 at 2:51
















  • It'd be convenient to have an online link, if not i'll check it out the next time I visit a library. Thanks anyways!
    – Sankha Kulathantille
    Sep 9 at 13:35










  • Can you try using a Sinhalese search term? That might find something that I couldn't.
    – ChrisW♦
    Sep 9 at 21:28










  • The Sinhalese term is 'මනෝරථපූරනී', but there are no downloadable versions
    – Sankha Kulathantille
    Sep 10 at 2:51















It'd be convenient to have an online link, if not i'll check it out the next time I visit a library. Thanks anyways!
– Sankha Kulathantille
Sep 9 at 13:35




It'd be convenient to have an online link, if not i'll check it out the next time I visit a library. Thanks anyways!
– Sankha Kulathantille
Sep 9 at 13:35












Can you try using a Sinhalese search term? That might find something that I couldn't.
– ChrisW♦
Sep 9 at 21:28




Can you try using a Sinhalese search term? That might find something that I couldn't.
– ChrisW♦
Sep 9 at 21:28












The Sinhalese term is 'මනෝරථපූරනී', but there are no downloadable versions
– Sankha Kulathantille
Sep 10 at 2:51




The Sinhalese term is 'මනෝරථපූරනී', but there are no downloadable versions
– Sankha Kulathantille
Sep 10 at 2:51










up vote
0
down vote













Sutta. Ma. U. Papañcasūdanī-Atthakatha, Bahudhātukasuttavaṇṇanā's translation :




The description of "It is impossible that a woman should be the Universal Monarch": Because the woman can't grow with The Thirty Two Marks of a Great Man, such as Phimosis, etc. The woman can't has seven gems, such as woman-gem (the precious woman). The woman's body can't be the biggest body of all human. So, Buddha said " It is impossible that a woman should be the Universal Monarch".





Actually, I don't want to answer like below because the feminists have resisted me before on my reply of some topic like this. I never want to attack anyone, buddha as well.



Sutta. Ma. U. Bahudhātukasuttaṃ:




Whatever fears, misfortunes and dangers arise, they all arise from the foolish not from the wise ... Therefore bhikkhus, to become wise inquirers, you should train thus.



...



“Venerable sir, saying it rightly how is the bhikkhu clever in the possible and impossible.” ... It is impossible that a woman should be the Universal Monarch It is possible that a man should be the Universal Monarch.



...



“Ānanda, call it, the Discourse on many elements, or The fourfold circle, or The mirror of the Teaching, or The drum of deathlessness, or The noble victory in the battle.”




That context is the same of Sun Tzu's clauses:




if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle.




The context is about the best no.1 winner (cakka-vatti/buddha/arahanta/etc.,) vs the ordinary (the follower). So, we have to look about the qualification of the best no.1 winner.



Remember: Buddhism never against female to be the best, if everything (everything is everything, everything is not something) of them can compare to the male. But by the science, history, environment, etc., it is quite harder than the male.



So, what is the qualification of the best no.1 winner?



  1. The best physical body.

  2. The best I.Q.

  3. The best E.Q.

  4. The best M.Q.

  5. The best Teacher.

  6. The best practice.

  7. The best effort.

  8. The best environment.

  9. Etc.

Then answer me for these questions to get the answer of this topic:



Don't let me answer it by myself, because I can be killed by the feminists.



  1. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best physical body compare to the other period of month?

  2. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best I.Q. compare to the other period of month?

  3. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best E.Q. compare to the other period of month?

  4. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best M.Q. compare to the other period of month?

  5. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best Teacher compare to the other period of month?

  6. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best practice compare to the other period of month?

  7. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best effort compare to the other period of month?

  8. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best environment compare to the other period of month?


  9. How many time of a life, that the male has bloody period?

  10. How are the patients feeling when they lost their nutriment for bloody lesion? While this situation, how are their I.Q., E.Q., M.Q., effort, etc.?

  11. How are the patients feeling when they stomachache by the bloody intestine? While this situation, how are their I.Q., E.Q., M.Q., effort, etc.?

  12. How the doctors, psychiatrist, etc., answer my question?

  13. Why Olympic separates the female competition from the male competition?

  14. Etc.

Remember: Buddhism never against female to be the best, if everything (everything is everything, everything is not something) of them can compare to the male. But by the science, history, environment, etc., it is quite harder than the male.




Actually, it is from tipitaka, Sutta. Ma. U. Bahudhātukasuttaṃ , not atthakatha:




It is impossible that a woman should be the Universal Monarch It is possible that a man should be the Universal Monarch.




It is from Mahidol University Application Budsir The Pali Tipitaka in Roman Character Volume 20 page 36-37.



http://www.84000.org/tipitaka/read/roman_read.php?B=20&A=738



Click here for these versions of this sutta: Siamrattha(THAI), Mahaculalonkorn University, Atthakatha Pali, and Thai translation of Atthakatha by Mahamakut University.






share|improve this answer


















  • 2




    It says "the reasons for this are given at AA.i.254". But Bahudhātuka sutta merely repeats the statement. Reasons are not given. I'm guessing the reasons/explanation is in the commentary.
    – Sankha Kulathantille
    Sep 9 at 13:31






  • 1




    I think the OP's question is not about the sutta, but about the reasons for that a woman can't be a universal monarch. And, apparently those reasons are given in AA.i.254, not the sutta itself.
    – Medhiṇī
    Sep 9 at 13:32










  • @Sankha Kulathantille Is it better?
    – Bonn
    Sep 10 at 4:10










  • @Bonn I'm looking for a reference of AA.i.254. Possibly an English translation of the Pali commentary. Not personal opinions.
    – Sankha Kulathantille
    Sep 10 at 4:42






  • 1




    See also Can the Buddha ever be a woman?
    – ChrisW♦
    Sep 10 at 8:27














up vote
0
down vote













Sutta. Ma. U. Papañcasūdanī-Atthakatha, Bahudhātukasuttavaṇṇanā's translation :




The description of "It is impossible that a woman should be the Universal Monarch": Because the woman can't grow with The Thirty Two Marks of a Great Man, such as Phimosis, etc. The woman can't has seven gems, such as woman-gem (the precious woman). The woman's body can't be the biggest body of all human. So, Buddha said " It is impossible that a woman should be the Universal Monarch".





Actually, I don't want to answer like below because the feminists have resisted me before on my reply of some topic like this. I never want to attack anyone, buddha as well.



Sutta. Ma. U. Bahudhātukasuttaṃ:




Whatever fears, misfortunes and dangers arise, they all arise from the foolish not from the wise ... Therefore bhikkhus, to become wise inquirers, you should train thus.



...



“Venerable sir, saying it rightly how is the bhikkhu clever in the possible and impossible.” ... It is impossible that a woman should be the Universal Monarch It is possible that a man should be the Universal Monarch.



...



“Ānanda, call it, the Discourse on many elements, or The fourfold circle, or The mirror of the Teaching, or The drum of deathlessness, or The noble victory in the battle.”




That context is the same of Sun Tzu's clauses:




if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle.




The context is about the best no.1 winner (cakka-vatti/buddha/arahanta/etc.,) vs the ordinary (the follower). So, we have to look about the qualification of the best no.1 winner.



Remember: Buddhism never against female to be the best, if everything (everything is everything, everything is not something) of them can compare to the male. But by the science, history, environment, etc., it is quite harder than the male.



So, what is the qualification of the best no.1 winner?



  1. The best physical body.

  2. The best I.Q.

  3. The best E.Q.

  4. The best M.Q.

  5. The best Teacher.

  6. The best practice.

  7. The best effort.

  8. The best environment.

  9. Etc.

Then answer me for these questions to get the answer of this topic:



Don't let me answer it by myself, because I can be killed by the feminists.



  1. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best physical body compare to the other period of month?

  2. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best I.Q. compare to the other period of month?

  3. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best E.Q. compare to the other period of month?

  4. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best M.Q. compare to the other period of month?

  5. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best Teacher compare to the other period of month?

  6. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best practice compare to the other period of month?

  7. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best effort compare to the other period of month?

  8. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best environment compare to the other period of month?


  9. How many time of a life, that the male has bloody period?

  10. How are the patients feeling when they lost their nutriment for bloody lesion? While this situation, how are their I.Q., E.Q., M.Q., effort, etc.?

  11. How are the patients feeling when they stomachache by the bloody intestine? While this situation, how are their I.Q., E.Q., M.Q., effort, etc.?

  12. How the doctors, psychiatrist, etc., answer my question?

  13. Why Olympic separates the female competition from the male competition?

  14. Etc.

Remember: Buddhism never against female to be the best, if everything (everything is everything, everything is not something) of them can compare to the male. But by the science, history, environment, etc., it is quite harder than the male.




Actually, it is from tipitaka, Sutta. Ma. U. Bahudhātukasuttaṃ , not atthakatha:




It is impossible that a woman should be the Universal Monarch It is possible that a man should be the Universal Monarch.




It is from Mahidol University Application Budsir The Pali Tipitaka in Roman Character Volume 20 page 36-37.



http://www.84000.org/tipitaka/read/roman_read.php?B=20&A=738



Click here for these versions of this sutta: Siamrattha(THAI), Mahaculalonkorn University, Atthakatha Pali, and Thai translation of Atthakatha by Mahamakut University.






share|improve this answer


















  • 2




    It says "the reasons for this are given at AA.i.254". But Bahudhātuka sutta merely repeats the statement. Reasons are not given. I'm guessing the reasons/explanation is in the commentary.
    – Sankha Kulathantille
    Sep 9 at 13:31






  • 1




    I think the OP's question is not about the sutta, but about the reasons for that a woman can't be a universal monarch. And, apparently those reasons are given in AA.i.254, not the sutta itself.
    – Medhiṇī
    Sep 9 at 13:32










  • @Sankha Kulathantille Is it better?
    – Bonn
    Sep 10 at 4:10










  • @Bonn I'm looking for a reference of AA.i.254. Possibly an English translation of the Pali commentary. Not personal opinions.
    – Sankha Kulathantille
    Sep 10 at 4:42






  • 1




    See also Can the Buddha ever be a woman?
    – ChrisW♦
    Sep 10 at 8:27












up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









Sutta. Ma. U. Papañcasūdanī-Atthakatha, Bahudhātukasuttavaṇṇanā's translation :




The description of "It is impossible that a woman should be the Universal Monarch": Because the woman can't grow with The Thirty Two Marks of a Great Man, such as Phimosis, etc. The woman can't has seven gems, such as woman-gem (the precious woman). The woman's body can't be the biggest body of all human. So, Buddha said " It is impossible that a woman should be the Universal Monarch".





Actually, I don't want to answer like below because the feminists have resisted me before on my reply of some topic like this. I never want to attack anyone, buddha as well.



Sutta. Ma. U. Bahudhātukasuttaṃ:




Whatever fears, misfortunes and dangers arise, they all arise from the foolish not from the wise ... Therefore bhikkhus, to become wise inquirers, you should train thus.



...



“Venerable sir, saying it rightly how is the bhikkhu clever in the possible and impossible.” ... It is impossible that a woman should be the Universal Monarch It is possible that a man should be the Universal Monarch.



...



“Ānanda, call it, the Discourse on many elements, or The fourfold circle, or The mirror of the Teaching, or The drum of deathlessness, or The noble victory in the battle.”




That context is the same of Sun Tzu's clauses:




if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle.




The context is about the best no.1 winner (cakka-vatti/buddha/arahanta/etc.,) vs the ordinary (the follower). So, we have to look about the qualification of the best no.1 winner.



Remember: Buddhism never against female to be the best, if everything (everything is everything, everything is not something) of them can compare to the male. But by the science, history, environment, etc., it is quite harder than the male.



So, what is the qualification of the best no.1 winner?



  1. The best physical body.

  2. The best I.Q.

  3. The best E.Q.

  4. The best M.Q.

  5. The best Teacher.

  6. The best practice.

  7. The best effort.

  8. The best environment.

  9. Etc.

Then answer me for these questions to get the answer of this topic:



Don't let me answer it by myself, because I can be killed by the feminists.



  1. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best physical body compare to the other period of month?

  2. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best I.Q. compare to the other period of month?

  3. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best E.Q. compare to the other period of month?

  4. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best M.Q. compare to the other period of month?

  5. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best Teacher compare to the other period of month?

  6. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best practice compare to the other period of month?

  7. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best effort compare to the other period of month?

  8. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best environment compare to the other period of month?


  9. How many time of a life, that the male has bloody period?

  10. How are the patients feeling when they lost their nutriment for bloody lesion? While this situation, how are their I.Q., E.Q., M.Q., effort, etc.?

  11. How are the patients feeling when they stomachache by the bloody intestine? While this situation, how are their I.Q., E.Q., M.Q., effort, etc.?

  12. How the doctors, psychiatrist, etc., answer my question?

  13. Why Olympic separates the female competition from the male competition?

  14. Etc.

Remember: Buddhism never against female to be the best, if everything (everything is everything, everything is not something) of them can compare to the male. But by the science, history, environment, etc., it is quite harder than the male.




Actually, it is from tipitaka, Sutta. Ma. U. Bahudhātukasuttaṃ , not atthakatha:




It is impossible that a woman should be the Universal Monarch It is possible that a man should be the Universal Monarch.




It is from Mahidol University Application Budsir The Pali Tipitaka in Roman Character Volume 20 page 36-37.



http://www.84000.org/tipitaka/read/roman_read.php?B=20&A=738



Click here for these versions of this sutta: Siamrattha(THAI), Mahaculalonkorn University, Atthakatha Pali, and Thai translation of Atthakatha by Mahamakut University.






share|improve this answer














Sutta. Ma. U. Papañcasūdanī-Atthakatha, Bahudhātukasuttavaṇṇanā's translation :




The description of "It is impossible that a woman should be the Universal Monarch": Because the woman can't grow with The Thirty Two Marks of a Great Man, such as Phimosis, etc. The woman can't has seven gems, such as woman-gem (the precious woman). The woman's body can't be the biggest body of all human. So, Buddha said " It is impossible that a woman should be the Universal Monarch".





Actually, I don't want to answer like below because the feminists have resisted me before on my reply of some topic like this. I never want to attack anyone, buddha as well.



Sutta. Ma. U. Bahudhātukasuttaṃ:




Whatever fears, misfortunes and dangers arise, they all arise from the foolish not from the wise ... Therefore bhikkhus, to become wise inquirers, you should train thus.



...



“Venerable sir, saying it rightly how is the bhikkhu clever in the possible and impossible.” ... It is impossible that a woman should be the Universal Monarch It is possible that a man should be the Universal Monarch.



...



“Ānanda, call it, the Discourse on many elements, or The fourfold circle, or The mirror of the Teaching, or The drum of deathlessness, or The noble victory in the battle.”




That context is the same of Sun Tzu's clauses:




if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle.




The context is about the best no.1 winner (cakka-vatti/buddha/arahanta/etc.,) vs the ordinary (the follower). So, we have to look about the qualification of the best no.1 winner.



Remember: Buddhism never against female to be the best, if everything (everything is everything, everything is not something) of them can compare to the male. But by the science, history, environment, etc., it is quite harder than the male.



So, what is the qualification of the best no.1 winner?



  1. The best physical body.

  2. The best I.Q.

  3. The best E.Q.

  4. The best M.Q.

  5. The best Teacher.

  6. The best practice.

  7. The best effort.

  8. The best environment.

  9. Etc.

Then answer me for these questions to get the answer of this topic:



Don't let me answer it by myself, because I can be killed by the feminists.



  1. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best physical body compare to the other period of month?

  2. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best I.Q. compare to the other period of month?

  3. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best E.Q. compare to the other period of month?

  4. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best M.Q. compare to the other period of month?

  5. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best Teacher compare to the other period of month?

  6. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best practice compare to the other period of month?

  7. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best effort compare to the other period of month?

  8. On menstrual period of every month, does a female has the best environment compare to the other period of month?


  9. How many time of a life, that the male has bloody period?

  10. How are the patients feeling when they lost their nutriment for bloody lesion? While this situation, how are their I.Q., E.Q., M.Q., effort, etc.?

  11. How are the patients feeling when they stomachache by the bloody intestine? While this situation, how are their I.Q., E.Q., M.Q., effort, etc.?

  12. How the doctors, psychiatrist, etc., answer my question?

  13. Why Olympic separates the female competition from the male competition?

  14. Etc.

Remember: Buddhism never against female to be the best, if everything (everything is everything, everything is not something) of them can compare to the male. But by the science, history, environment, etc., it is quite harder than the male.




Actually, it is from tipitaka, Sutta. Ma. U. Bahudhātukasuttaṃ , not atthakatha:




It is impossible that a woman should be the Universal Monarch It is possible that a man should be the Universal Monarch.




It is from Mahidol University Application Budsir The Pali Tipitaka in Roman Character Volume 20 page 36-37.



http://www.84000.org/tipitaka/read/roman_read.php?B=20&A=738



Click here for these versions of this sutta: Siamrattha(THAI), Mahaculalonkorn University, Atthakatha Pali, and Thai translation of Atthakatha by Mahamakut University.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Sep 10 at 7:13

























answered Sep 9 at 10:54









Bonn

2,8451214




2,8451214







  • 2




    It says "the reasons for this are given at AA.i.254". But Bahudhātuka sutta merely repeats the statement. Reasons are not given. I'm guessing the reasons/explanation is in the commentary.
    – Sankha Kulathantille
    Sep 9 at 13:31






  • 1




    I think the OP's question is not about the sutta, but about the reasons for that a woman can't be a universal monarch. And, apparently those reasons are given in AA.i.254, not the sutta itself.
    – Medhiṇī
    Sep 9 at 13:32










  • @Sankha Kulathantille Is it better?
    – Bonn
    Sep 10 at 4:10










  • @Bonn I'm looking for a reference of AA.i.254. Possibly an English translation of the Pali commentary. Not personal opinions.
    – Sankha Kulathantille
    Sep 10 at 4:42






  • 1




    See also Can the Buddha ever be a woman?
    – ChrisW♦
    Sep 10 at 8:27












  • 2




    It says "the reasons for this are given at AA.i.254". But Bahudhātuka sutta merely repeats the statement. Reasons are not given. I'm guessing the reasons/explanation is in the commentary.
    – Sankha Kulathantille
    Sep 9 at 13:31






  • 1




    I think the OP's question is not about the sutta, but about the reasons for that a woman can't be a universal monarch. And, apparently those reasons are given in AA.i.254, not the sutta itself.
    – Medhiṇī
    Sep 9 at 13:32










  • @Sankha Kulathantille Is it better?
    – Bonn
    Sep 10 at 4:10










  • @Bonn I'm looking for a reference of AA.i.254. Possibly an English translation of the Pali commentary. Not personal opinions.
    – Sankha Kulathantille
    Sep 10 at 4:42






  • 1




    See also Can the Buddha ever be a woman?
    – ChrisW♦
    Sep 10 at 8:27







2




2




It says "the reasons for this are given at AA.i.254". But Bahudhātuka sutta merely repeats the statement. Reasons are not given. I'm guessing the reasons/explanation is in the commentary.
– Sankha Kulathantille
Sep 9 at 13:31




It says "the reasons for this are given at AA.i.254". But Bahudhātuka sutta merely repeats the statement. Reasons are not given. I'm guessing the reasons/explanation is in the commentary.
– Sankha Kulathantille
Sep 9 at 13:31




1




1




I think the OP's question is not about the sutta, but about the reasons for that a woman can't be a universal monarch. And, apparently those reasons are given in AA.i.254, not the sutta itself.
– Medhiṇī
Sep 9 at 13:32




I think the OP's question is not about the sutta, but about the reasons for that a woman can't be a universal monarch. And, apparently those reasons are given in AA.i.254, not the sutta itself.
– Medhiṇī
Sep 9 at 13:32












@Sankha Kulathantille Is it better?
– Bonn
Sep 10 at 4:10




@Sankha Kulathantille Is it better?
– Bonn
Sep 10 at 4:10












@Bonn I'm looking for a reference of AA.i.254. Possibly an English translation of the Pali commentary. Not personal opinions.
– Sankha Kulathantille
Sep 10 at 4:42




@Bonn I'm looking for a reference of AA.i.254. Possibly an English translation of the Pali commentary. Not personal opinions.
– Sankha Kulathantille
Sep 10 at 4:42




1




1




See also Can the Buddha ever be a woman?
– ChrisW♦
Sep 10 at 8:27




See also Can the Buddha ever be a woman?
– ChrisW♦
Sep 10 at 8:27

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbuddhism.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29150%2fonline-reference-to-aa-i-254%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Carbon dioxide

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?