Evaluate $int_gamma z Im(z^2) dz$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite













I am trying to find $$int_gamma z Im(z^2) dz,$$
where $gamma$ is the unit circle traversed once, anticlockwise.




My attempt:



let $gamma(t)=e^itimplies gamma'(t)=ie^it tin[0,2pi]$.
beginalign
int_gamma z Im(z^2) dx&=int_0^2pi e^itsin(2t) ie^it dt\
&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt
endalign
Now, I let
beginalign
I&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt \
&=ileft(left[frace^2it2isin(2t)right]_0^2pi-frac1iint_0^2pi e^2itcos(2t) dtright) \
&=-int_0^2pi e^2itcos(2t) dt \
&=-left(left[frace^2it2icos(2t)right]_0^2pi+frac1iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dtright) \
&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt
endalign



Where am I going wrong? Wolfram says the answer is $-pi$.



edit



I can see an alternative approach. We could express the integrand as, $$(cos(2t)+isin(2t))sin(2t)=cos(2t)sin(2t)+isin^2(2t).$$ But I prefer using integration by parts and would like to see the solution achieved via this approach.










share|cite|improve this question























  • Sorry, this was a mistype. Thanks for spotting this
    – Bell
    Sep 9 at 6:33






  • 1




    "Where am I going wrong?" You are not, only, you "proved" that $$iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt$$
    – Did
    Sep 9 at 7:17










  • The result given by integration by parts was not what I expected haha I expected a multiple of $I$ would appear on the RHS, which I could bring to the LHS and solved like this. I remember seeing a similar method in real calculus.
    – Bell
    Sep 9 at 7:53














up vote
2
down vote

favorite













I am trying to find $$int_gamma z Im(z^2) dz,$$
where $gamma$ is the unit circle traversed once, anticlockwise.




My attempt:



let $gamma(t)=e^itimplies gamma'(t)=ie^it tin[0,2pi]$.
beginalign
int_gamma z Im(z^2) dx&=int_0^2pi e^itsin(2t) ie^it dt\
&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt
endalign
Now, I let
beginalign
I&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt \
&=ileft(left[frace^2it2isin(2t)right]_0^2pi-frac1iint_0^2pi e^2itcos(2t) dtright) \
&=-int_0^2pi e^2itcos(2t) dt \
&=-left(left[frace^2it2icos(2t)right]_0^2pi+frac1iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dtright) \
&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt
endalign



Where am I going wrong? Wolfram says the answer is $-pi$.



edit



I can see an alternative approach. We could express the integrand as, $$(cos(2t)+isin(2t))sin(2t)=cos(2t)sin(2t)+isin^2(2t).$$ But I prefer using integration by parts and would like to see the solution achieved via this approach.










share|cite|improve this question























  • Sorry, this was a mistype. Thanks for spotting this
    – Bell
    Sep 9 at 6:33






  • 1




    "Where am I going wrong?" You are not, only, you "proved" that $$iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt$$
    – Did
    Sep 9 at 7:17










  • The result given by integration by parts was not what I expected haha I expected a multiple of $I$ would appear on the RHS, which I could bring to the LHS and solved like this. I remember seeing a similar method in real calculus.
    – Bell
    Sep 9 at 7:53












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I am trying to find $$int_gamma z Im(z^2) dz,$$
where $gamma$ is the unit circle traversed once, anticlockwise.




My attempt:



let $gamma(t)=e^itimplies gamma'(t)=ie^it tin[0,2pi]$.
beginalign
int_gamma z Im(z^2) dx&=int_0^2pi e^itsin(2t) ie^it dt\
&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt
endalign
Now, I let
beginalign
I&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt \
&=ileft(left[frace^2it2isin(2t)right]_0^2pi-frac1iint_0^2pi e^2itcos(2t) dtright) \
&=-int_0^2pi e^2itcos(2t) dt \
&=-left(left[frace^2it2icos(2t)right]_0^2pi+frac1iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dtright) \
&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt
endalign



Where am I going wrong? Wolfram says the answer is $-pi$.



edit



I can see an alternative approach. We could express the integrand as, $$(cos(2t)+isin(2t))sin(2t)=cos(2t)sin(2t)+isin^2(2t).$$ But I prefer using integration by parts and would like to see the solution achieved via this approach.










share|cite|improve this question
















I am trying to find $$int_gamma z Im(z^2) dz,$$
where $gamma$ is the unit circle traversed once, anticlockwise.




My attempt:



let $gamma(t)=e^itimplies gamma'(t)=ie^it tin[0,2pi]$.
beginalign
int_gamma z Im(z^2) dx&=int_0^2pi e^itsin(2t) ie^it dt\
&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt
endalign
Now, I let
beginalign
I&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt \
&=ileft(left[frace^2it2isin(2t)right]_0^2pi-frac1iint_0^2pi e^2itcos(2t) dtright) \
&=-int_0^2pi e^2itcos(2t) dt \
&=-left(left[frace^2it2icos(2t)right]_0^2pi+frac1iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dtright) \
&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt
endalign



Where am I going wrong? Wolfram says the answer is $-pi$.



edit



I can see an alternative approach. We could express the integrand as, $$(cos(2t)+isin(2t))sin(2t)=cos(2t)sin(2t)+isin^2(2t).$$ But I prefer using integration by parts and would like to see the solution achieved via this approach.







complex-analysis proof-verification contour-integration






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Sep 9 at 6:39

























asked Sep 9 at 6:29









Bell

852314




852314











  • Sorry, this was a mistype. Thanks for spotting this
    – Bell
    Sep 9 at 6:33






  • 1




    "Where am I going wrong?" You are not, only, you "proved" that $$iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt$$
    – Did
    Sep 9 at 7:17










  • The result given by integration by parts was not what I expected haha I expected a multiple of $I$ would appear on the RHS, which I could bring to the LHS and solved like this. I remember seeing a similar method in real calculus.
    – Bell
    Sep 9 at 7:53
















  • Sorry, this was a mistype. Thanks for spotting this
    – Bell
    Sep 9 at 6:33






  • 1




    "Where am I going wrong?" You are not, only, you "proved" that $$iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt$$
    – Did
    Sep 9 at 7:17










  • The result given by integration by parts was not what I expected haha I expected a multiple of $I$ would appear on the RHS, which I could bring to the LHS and solved like this. I remember seeing a similar method in real calculus.
    – Bell
    Sep 9 at 7:53















Sorry, this was a mistype. Thanks for spotting this
– Bell
Sep 9 at 6:33




Sorry, this was a mistype. Thanks for spotting this
– Bell
Sep 9 at 6:33




1




1




"Where am I going wrong?" You are not, only, you "proved" that $$iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt$$
– Did
Sep 9 at 7:17




"Where am I going wrong?" You are not, only, you "proved" that $$iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt$$
– Did
Sep 9 at 7:17












The result given by integration by parts was not what I expected haha I expected a multiple of $I$ would appear on the RHS, which I could bring to the LHS and solved like this. I remember seeing a similar method in real calculus.
– Bell
Sep 9 at 7:53




The result given by integration by parts was not what I expected haha I expected a multiple of $I$ would appear on the RHS, which I could bring to the LHS and solved like this. I remember seeing a similar method in real calculus.
– Bell
Sep 9 at 7:53










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










$$I=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itdfrace^2it-e^-2it2i dt=dfrac12int_0^2pi e^4it-1 dt=-pi$$






share|cite|improve this answer



























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    You have that



    beginalign
    2I
    &=
    int_0^2pi, -e^2itBig(cos(2t) -isin(2t)Big) ,dt
    \&=
    int_0^2pi, -e^2itBig(cos(-2t) +isin(-2t)Big) ,dt
    \&=
    int_0^2pi, -e^2it,e^-2it ,dt
    \&=
    int_0^2pi, -1 ,dt = -2pi
    endalign






    share|cite|improve this answer




















      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2910463%2fevaluate-int-gamma-z-imz2-dz%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted










      $$I=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itdfrace^2it-e^-2it2i dt=dfrac12int_0^2pi e^4it-1 dt=-pi$$






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted










        $$I=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itdfrace^2it-e^-2it2i dt=dfrac12int_0^2pi e^4it-1 dt=-pi$$






        share|cite|improve this answer






















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          $$I=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itdfrace^2it-e^-2it2i dt=dfrac12int_0^2pi e^4it-1 dt=-pi$$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          $$I=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itdfrace^2it-e^-2it2i dt=dfrac12int_0^2pi e^4it-1 dt=-pi$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Sep 9 at 6:51









          Nosrati

          22.8k61951




          22.8k61951




















              up vote
              2
              down vote













              You have that



              beginalign
              2I
              &=
              int_0^2pi, -e^2itBig(cos(2t) -isin(2t)Big) ,dt
              \&=
              int_0^2pi, -e^2itBig(cos(-2t) +isin(-2t)Big) ,dt
              \&=
              int_0^2pi, -e^2it,e^-2it ,dt
              \&=
              int_0^2pi, -1 ,dt = -2pi
              endalign






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                2
                down vote













                You have that



                beginalign
                2I
                &=
                int_0^2pi, -e^2itBig(cos(2t) -isin(2t)Big) ,dt
                \&=
                int_0^2pi, -e^2itBig(cos(-2t) +isin(-2t)Big) ,dt
                \&=
                int_0^2pi, -e^2it,e^-2it ,dt
                \&=
                int_0^2pi, -1 ,dt = -2pi
                endalign






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote









                  You have that



                  beginalign
                  2I
                  &=
                  int_0^2pi, -e^2itBig(cos(2t) -isin(2t)Big) ,dt
                  \&=
                  int_0^2pi, -e^2itBig(cos(-2t) +isin(-2t)Big) ,dt
                  \&=
                  int_0^2pi, -e^2it,e^-2it ,dt
                  \&=
                  int_0^2pi, -1 ,dt = -2pi
                  endalign






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  You have that



                  beginalign
                  2I
                  &=
                  int_0^2pi, -e^2itBig(cos(2t) -isin(2t)Big) ,dt
                  \&=
                  int_0^2pi, -e^2itBig(cos(-2t) +isin(-2t)Big) ,dt
                  \&=
                  int_0^2pi, -e^2it,e^-2it ,dt
                  \&=
                  int_0^2pi, -1 ,dt = -2pi
                  endalign







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Sep 9 at 6:46









                  Fimpellizieri

                  16.9k11835




                  16.9k11835



























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2910463%2fevaluate-int-gamma-z-imz2-dz%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      這個網誌中的熱門文章

                      tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

                      How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                      1st Magritte Awards