Evaluate $int_gamma z Im(z^2) dz$

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I am trying to find $$int_gamma z Im(z^2) dz,$$
where $gamma$ is the unit circle traversed once, anticlockwise.
My attempt:
let $gamma(t)=e^itimplies gamma'(t)=ie^it tin[0,2pi]$.
beginalign
int_gamma z Im(z^2) dx&=int_0^2pi e^itsin(2t) ie^it dt\
&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt
endalign
Now, I let
beginalign
I&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt \
&=ileft(left[frace^2it2isin(2t)right]_0^2pi-frac1iint_0^2pi e^2itcos(2t) dtright) \
&=-int_0^2pi e^2itcos(2t) dt \
&=-left(left[frace^2it2icos(2t)right]_0^2pi+frac1iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dtright) \
&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt
endalign
Where am I going wrong? Wolfram says the answer is $-pi$.
edit
I can see an alternative approach. We could express the integrand as, $$(cos(2t)+isin(2t))sin(2t)=cos(2t)sin(2t)+isin^2(2t).$$ But I prefer using integration by parts and would like to see the solution achieved via this approach.
complex-analysis proof-verification contour-integration
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I am trying to find $$int_gamma z Im(z^2) dz,$$
where $gamma$ is the unit circle traversed once, anticlockwise.
My attempt:
let $gamma(t)=e^itimplies gamma'(t)=ie^it tin[0,2pi]$.
beginalign
int_gamma z Im(z^2) dx&=int_0^2pi e^itsin(2t) ie^it dt\
&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt
endalign
Now, I let
beginalign
I&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt \
&=ileft(left[frace^2it2isin(2t)right]_0^2pi-frac1iint_0^2pi e^2itcos(2t) dtright) \
&=-int_0^2pi e^2itcos(2t) dt \
&=-left(left[frace^2it2icos(2t)right]_0^2pi+frac1iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dtright) \
&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt
endalign
Where am I going wrong? Wolfram says the answer is $-pi$.
edit
I can see an alternative approach. We could express the integrand as, $$(cos(2t)+isin(2t))sin(2t)=cos(2t)sin(2t)+isin^2(2t).$$ But I prefer using integration by parts and would like to see the solution achieved via this approach.
complex-analysis proof-verification contour-integration
Sorry, this was a mistype. Thanks for spotting this
â Bell
Sep 9 at 6:33
1
"Where am I going wrong?" You are not, only, you "proved" that $$iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt$$
â Did
Sep 9 at 7:17
The result given by integration by parts was not what I expected haha I expected a multiple of $I$ would appear on the RHS, which I could bring to the LHS and solved like this. I remember seeing a similar method in real calculus.
â Bell
Sep 9 at 7:53
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I am trying to find $$int_gamma z Im(z^2) dz,$$
where $gamma$ is the unit circle traversed once, anticlockwise.
My attempt:
let $gamma(t)=e^itimplies gamma'(t)=ie^it tin[0,2pi]$.
beginalign
int_gamma z Im(z^2) dx&=int_0^2pi e^itsin(2t) ie^it dt\
&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt
endalign
Now, I let
beginalign
I&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt \
&=ileft(left[frace^2it2isin(2t)right]_0^2pi-frac1iint_0^2pi e^2itcos(2t) dtright) \
&=-int_0^2pi e^2itcos(2t) dt \
&=-left(left[frace^2it2icos(2t)right]_0^2pi+frac1iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dtright) \
&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt
endalign
Where am I going wrong? Wolfram says the answer is $-pi$.
edit
I can see an alternative approach. We could express the integrand as, $$(cos(2t)+isin(2t))sin(2t)=cos(2t)sin(2t)+isin^2(2t).$$ But I prefer using integration by parts and would like to see the solution achieved via this approach.
complex-analysis proof-verification contour-integration
I am trying to find $$int_gamma z Im(z^2) dz,$$
where $gamma$ is the unit circle traversed once, anticlockwise.
My attempt:
let $gamma(t)=e^itimplies gamma'(t)=ie^it tin[0,2pi]$.
beginalign
int_gamma z Im(z^2) dx&=int_0^2pi e^itsin(2t) ie^it dt\
&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt
endalign
Now, I let
beginalign
I&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt \
&=ileft(left[frace^2it2isin(2t)right]_0^2pi-frac1iint_0^2pi e^2itcos(2t) dtright) \
&=-int_0^2pi e^2itcos(2t) dt \
&=-left(left[frace^2it2icos(2t)right]_0^2pi+frac1iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dtright) \
&=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt
endalign
Where am I going wrong? Wolfram says the answer is $-pi$.
edit
I can see an alternative approach. We could express the integrand as, $$(cos(2t)+isin(2t))sin(2t)=cos(2t)sin(2t)+isin^2(2t).$$ But I prefer using integration by parts and would like to see the solution achieved via this approach.
complex-analysis proof-verification contour-integration
complex-analysis proof-verification contour-integration
edited Sep 9 at 6:39
asked Sep 9 at 6:29
Bell
852314
852314
Sorry, this was a mistype. Thanks for spotting this
â Bell
Sep 9 at 6:33
1
"Where am I going wrong?" You are not, only, you "proved" that $$iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt$$
â Did
Sep 9 at 7:17
The result given by integration by parts was not what I expected haha I expected a multiple of $I$ would appear on the RHS, which I could bring to the LHS and solved like this. I remember seeing a similar method in real calculus.
â Bell
Sep 9 at 7:53
add a comment |Â
Sorry, this was a mistype. Thanks for spotting this
â Bell
Sep 9 at 6:33
1
"Where am I going wrong?" You are not, only, you "proved" that $$iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt$$
â Did
Sep 9 at 7:17
The result given by integration by parts was not what I expected haha I expected a multiple of $I$ would appear on the RHS, which I could bring to the LHS and solved like this. I remember seeing a similar method in real calculus.
â Bell
Sep 9 at 7:53
Sorry, this was a mistype. Thanks for spotting this
â Bell
Sep 9 at 6:33
Sorry, this was a mistype. Thanks for spotting this
â Bell
Sep 9 at 6:33
1
1
"Where am I going wrong?" You are not, only, you "proved" that $$iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt$$
â Did
Sep 9 at 7:17
"Where am I going wrong?" You are not, only, you "proved" that $$iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt$$
â Did
Sep 9 at 7:17
The result given by integration by parts was not what I expected haha I expected a multiple of $I$ would appear on the RHS, which I could bring to the LHS and solved like this. I remember seeing a similar method in real calculus.
â Bell
Sep 9 at 7:53
The result given by integration by parts was not what I expected haha I expected a multiple of $I$ would appear on the RHS, which I could bring to the LHS and solved like this. I remember seeing a similar method in real calculus.
â Bell
Sep 9 at 7:53
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
$$I=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itdfrace^2it-e^-2it2i dt=dfrac12int_0^2pi e^4it-1 dt=-pi$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
You have that
beginalign
2I
&=
int_0^2pi, -e^2itBig(cos(2t) -isin(2t)Big) ,dt
\&=
int_0^2pi, -e^2itBig(cos(-2t) +isin(-2t)Big) ,dt
\&=
int_0^2pi, -e^2it,e^-2it ,dt
\&=
int_0^2pi, -1 ,dt = -2pi
endalign
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
$$I=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itdfrace^2it-e^-2it2i dt=dfrac12int_0^2pi e^4it-1 dt=-pi$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
$$I=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itdfrace^2it-e^-2it2i dt=dfrac12int_0^2pi e^4it-1 dt=-pi$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
$$I=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itdfrace^2it-e^-2it2i dt=dfrac12int_0^2pi e^4it-1 dt=-pi$$
$$I=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itdfrace^2it-e^-2it2i dt=dfrac12int_0^2pi e^4it-1 dt=-pi$$
answered Sep 9 at 6:51
Nosrati
22.8k61951
22.8k61951
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
You have that
beginalign
2I
&=
int_0^2pi, -e^2itBig(cos(2t) -isin(2t)Big) ,dt
\&=
int_0^2pi, -e^2itBig(cos(-2t) +isin(-2t)Big) ,dt
\&=
int_0^2pi, -e^2it,e^-2it ,dt
\&=
int_0^2pi, -1 ,dt = -2pi
endalign
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
You have that
beginalign
2I
&=
int_0^2pi, -e^2itBig(cos(2t) -isin(2t)Big) ,dt
\&=
int_0^2pi, -e^2itBig(cos(-2t) +isin(-2t)Big) ,dt
\&=
int_0^2pi, -e^2it,e^-2it ,dt
\&=
int_0^2pi, -1 ,dt = -2pi
endalign
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
You have that
beginalign
2I
&=
int_0^2pi, -e^2itBig(cos(2t) -isin(2t)Big) ,dt
\&=
int_0^2pi, -e^2itBig(cos(-2t) +isin(-2t)Big) ,dt
\&=
int_0^2pi, -e^2it,e^-2it ,dt
\&=
int_0^2pi, -1 ,dt = -2pi
endalign
You have that
beginalign
2I
&=
int_0^2pi, -e^2itBig(cos(2t) -isin(2t)Big) ,dt
\&=
int_0^2pi, -e^2itBig(cos(-2t) +isin(-2t)Big) ,dt
\&=
int_0^2pi, -e^2it,e^-2it ,dt
\&=
int_0^2pi, -1 ,dt = -2pi
endalign
answered Sep 9 at 6:46
Fimpellizieri
16.9k11835
16.9k11835
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2910463%2fevaluate-int-gamma-z-imz2-dz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sorry, this was a mistype. Thanks for spotting this
â Bell
Sep 9 at 6:33
1
"Where am I going wrong?" You are not, only, you "proved" that $$iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt=iint_0^2pi e^2itsin(2t) dt$$
â Did
Sep 9 at 7:17
The result given by integration by parts was not what I expected haha I expected a multiple of $I$ would appear on the RHS, which I could bring to the LHS and solved like this. I remember seeing a similar method in real calculus.
â Bell
Sep 9 at 7:53