Stationary distribution of DTMC with infinite state space

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am solving the stationary distirbution of a Discrete time Markov Chain with infinite state space. The state space is $pi^H_0,pi^H_1,...,pi^L_0,pi^L_1,...$. The transition matrix has structure. I eventually reduce the system linear equations into the following two series. But feel no clue about how to start to solve them....
beginalign*
&begincases
&pi^H_0=api^H_1\
&pi^H_1=api^H_0+api^H_2+cpi^L_0\
&pi^H_n=bpi^H_n-1+api^H_n+1,~forall~ngeq 2
endcases~~
begincases
&pi^L_0=cpi^L_1\
&pi^L_1=bpi^H_0+dpi^L_0+cpi^L_2\
&pi^L_n=dpi^L_n-1+cpi^L_n+1,~forall~ngeq 2
endcases\
&sum_n=0^infty(pi^H_n+pi^L_n)=1\
&a+b=1,~c+d=1,~a,b,c,d~mboxare all positive constant pi^H_n_n=0^infty~mboxand pi^L_n_n=0^infty~mboxare all non-negative variables
endalign*










share|cite|improve this question





















  • "The state space is $pi^H_0,pi^H_1,... ,pi^L_0,pi^L_1, ...$." You might mean that the state space is $$H,Ltimes0,1,2,ldots$$
    – Did
    Sep 9 at 9:41










  • @Did Yes, sorry for my bad notation
    – KevinKim
    Sep 9 at 10:12














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am solving the stationary distirbution of a Discrete time Markov Chain with infinite state space. The state space is $pi^H_0,pi^H_1,...,pi^L_0,pi^L_1,...$. The transition matrix has structure. I eventually reduce the system linear equations into the following two series. But feel no clue about how to start to solve them....
beginalign*
&begincases
&pi^H_0=api^H_1\
&pi^H_1=api^H_0+api^H_2+cpi^L_0\
&pi^H_n=bpi^H_n-1+api^H_n+1,~forall~ngeq 2
endcases~~
begincases
&pi^L_0=cpi^L_1\
&pi^L_1=bpi^H_0+dpi^L_0+cpi^L_2\
&pi^L_n=dpi^L_n-1+cpi^L_n+1,~forall~ngeq 2
endcases\
&sum_n=0^infty(pi^H_n+pi^L_n)=1\
&a+b=1,~c+d=1,~a,b,c,d~mboxare all positive constant pi^H_n_n=0^infty~mboxand pi^L_n_n=0^infty~mboxare all non-negative variables
endalign*










share|cite|improve this question





















  • "The state space is $pi^H_0,pi^H_1,... ,pi^L_0,pi^L_1, ...$." You might mean that the state space is $$H,Ltimes0,1,2,ldots$$
    – Did
    Sep 9 at 9:41










  • @Did Yes, sorry for my bad notation
    – KevinKim
    Sep 9 at 10:12












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I am solving the stationary distirbution of a Discrete time Markov Chain with infinite state space. The state space is $pi^H_0,pi^H_1,...,pi^L_0,pi^L_1,...$. The transition matrix has structure. I eventually reduce the system linear equations into the following two series. But feel no clue about how to start to solve them....
beginalign*
&begincases
&pi^H_0=api^H_1\
&pi^H_1=api^H_0+api^H_2+cpi^L_0\
&pi^H_n=bpi^H_n-1+api^H_n+1,~forall~ngeq 2
endcases~~
begincases
&pi^L_0=cpi^L_1\
&pi^L_1=bpi^H_0+dpi^L_0+cpi^L_2\
&pi^L_n=dpi^L_n-1+cpi^L_n+1,~forall~ngeq 2
endcases\
&sum_n=0^infty(pi^H_n+pi^L_n)=1\
&a+b=1,~c+d=1,~a,b,c,d~mboxare all positive constant pi^H_n_n=0^infty~mboxand pi^L_n_n=0^infty~mboxare all non-negative variables
endalign*










share|cite|improve this question













I am solving the stationary distirbution of a Discrete time Markov Chain with infinite state space. The state space is $pi^H_0,pi^H_1,...,pi^L_0,pi^L_1,...$. The transition matrix has structure. I eventually reduce the system linear equations into the following two series. But feel no clue about how to start to solve them....
beginalign*
&begincases
&pi^H_0=api^H_1\
&pi^H_1=api^H_0+api^H_2+cpi^L_0\
&pi^H_n=bpi^H_n-1+api^H_n+1,~forall~ngeq 2
endcases~~
begincases
&pi^L_0=cpi^L_1\
&pi^L_1=bpi^H_0+dpi^L_0+cpi^L_2\
&pi^L_n=dpi^L_n-1+cpi^L_n+1,~forall~ngeq 2
endcases\
&sum_n=0^infty(pi^H_n+pi^L_n)=1\
&a+b=1,~c+d=1,~a,b,c,d~mboxare all positive constant pi^H_n_n=0^infty~mboxand pi^L_n_n=0^infty~mboxare all non-negative variables
endalign*







markov-chains markov-process






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Sep 9 at 8:30









KevinKim

7613




7613











  • "The state space is $pi^H_0,pi^H_1,... ,pi^L_0,pi^L_1, ...$." You might mean that the state space is $$H,Ltimes0,1,2,ldots$$
    – Did
    Sep 9 at 9:41










  • @Did Yes, sorry for my bad notation
    – KevinKim
    Sep 9 at 10:12
















  • "The state space is $pi^H_0,pi^H_1,... ,pi^L_0,pi^L_1, ...$." You might mean that the state space is $$H,Ltimes0,1,2,ldots$$
    – Did
    Sep 9 at 9:41










  • @Did Yes, sorry for my bad notation
    – KevinKim
    Sep 9 at 10:12















"The state space is $pi^H_0,pi^H_1,... ,pi^L_0,pi^L_1, ...$." You might mean that the state space is $$H,Ltimes0,1,2,ldots$$
– Did
Sep 9 at 9:41




"The state space is $pi^H_0,pi^H_1,... ,pi^L_0,pi^L_1, ...$." You might mean that the state space is $$H,Ltimes0,1,2,ldots$$
– Did
Sep 9 at 9:41












@Did Yes, sorry for my bad notation
– KevinKim
Sep 9 at 10:12




@Did Yes, sorry for my bad notation
– KevinKim
Sep 9 at 10:12










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













The recurrences in the third lines aren't coupled, so they can be solved with the standard ansatz $pi_k^H=lambda^k$:



$$
lambda^n=blambda^n-1+alambda^n+1;,
$$



which yields the characteristic equation



$$
alambda^2-lambda+b=0
$$



(and likewise for $pi^L$). This yields two linearly independent solutions each, for a total of $4$ free coefficients. The first two lines allow you to express the values for $n=1,2$ in terms of the initial values for $n=0$, yielding one condition each. That leaves two degrees of freedom, and normalization reduces this to one. This might be eliminated if one of the characteristic values has magnitude greater than $1$ and thus isn't suitable for representing probabilities.






share|cite|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2910546%2fstationary-distribution-of-dtmc-with-infinite-state-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    The recurrences in the third lines aren't coupled, so they can be solved with the standard ansatz $pi_k^H=lambda^k$:



    $$
    lambda^n=blambda^n-1+alambda^n+1;,
    $$



    which yields the characteristic equation



    $$
    alambda^2-lambda+b=0
    $$



    (and likewise for $pi^L$). This yields two linearly independent solutions each, for a total of $4$ free coefficients. The first two lines allow you to express the values for $n=1,2$ in terms of the initial values for $n=0$, yielding one condition each. That leaves two degrees of freedom, and normalization reduces this to one. This might be eliminated if one of the characteristic values has magnitude greater than $1$ and thus isn't suitable for representing probabilities.






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      The recurrences in the third lines aren't coupled, so they can be solved with the standard ansatz $pi_k^H=lambda^k$:



      $$
      lambda^n=blambda^n-1+alambda^n+1;,
      $$



      which yields the characteristic equation



      $$
      alambda^2-lambda+b=0
      $$



      (and likewise for $pi^L$). This yields two linearly independent solutions each, for a total of $4$ free coefficients. The first two lines allow you to express the values for $n=1,2$ in terms of the initial values for $n=0$, yielding one condition each. That leaves two degrees of freedom, and normalization reduces this to one. This might be eliminated if one of the characteristic values has magnitude greater than $1$ and thus isn't suitable for representing probabilities.






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        The recurrences in the third lines aren't coupled, so they can be solved with the standard ansatz $pi_k^H=lambda^k$:



        $$
        lambda^n=blambda^n-1+alambda^n+1;,
        $$



        which yields the characteristic equation



        $$
        alambda^2-lambda+b=0
        $$



        (and likewise for $pi^L$). This yields two linearly independent solutions each, for a total of $4$ free coefficients. The first two lines allow you to express the values for $n=1,2$ in terms of the initial values for $n=0$, yielding one condition each. That leaves two degrees of freedom, and normalization reduces this to one. This might be eliminated if one of the characteristic values has magnitude greater than $1$ and thus isn't suitable for representing probabilities.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        The recurrences in the third lines aren't coupled, so they can be solved with the standard ansatz $pi_k^H=lambda^k$:



        $$
        lambda^n=blambda^n-1+alambda^n+1;,
        $$



        which yields the characteristic equation



        $$
        alambda^2-lambda+b=0
        $$



        (and likewise for $pi^L$). This yields two linearly independent solutions each, for a total of $4$ free coefficients. The first two lines allow you to express the values for $n=1,2$ in terms of the initial values for $n=0$, yielding one condition each. That leaves two degrees of freedom, and normalization reduces this to one. This might be eliminated if one of the characteristic values has magnitude greater than $1$ and thus isn't suitable for representing probabilities.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Sep 9 at 8:55









        joriki

        169k10181337




        169k10181337



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2910546%2fstationary-distribution-of-dtmc-with-infinite-state-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

            Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

            Strongly p-embedded subgroups and p-Sylow subgroups.