Why do minimal polynomial have coefficients in the integral closured ring?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I'm reading the following theorem:
enter image description here



My question is, why are $a_i$s in $A[alpha_1...alpha_n]$?










share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    The as are the result of evaluating the elementary symmetric functions on the alphas.
    – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
    Feb 27 '17 at 4:47











  • I guess I know the answer now...how stupid I am...
    – CYC
    Feb 27 '17 at 4:57






  • 3




    I suggest you write a complete answer answering your question.
    – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
    Feb 27 '17 at 5:25














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I'm reading the following theorem:
enter image description here



My question is, why are $a_i$s in $A[alpha_1...alpha_n]$?










share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    The as are the result of evaluating the elementary symmetric functions on the alphas.
    – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
    Feb 27 '17 at 4:47











  • I guess I know the answer now...how stupid I am...
    – CYC
    Feb 27 '17 at 4:57






  • 3




    I suggest you write a complete answer answering your question.
    – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
    Feb 27 '17 at 5:25












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











I'm reading the following theorem:
enter image description here



My question is, why are $a_i$s in $A[alpha_1...alpha_n]$?










share|cite|improve this question













I'm reading the following theorem:
enter image description here



My question is, why are $a_i$s in $A[alpha_1...alpha_n]$?







abstract-algebra field-theory algebraic-number-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Feb 27 '17 at 4:39









CYC

940711




940711







  • 1




    The as are the result of evaluating the elementary symmetric functions on the alphas.
    – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
    Feb 27 '17 at 4:47











  • I guess I know the answer now...how stupid I am...
    – CYC
    Feb 27 '17 at 4:57






  • 3




    I suggest you write a complete answer answering your question.
    – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
    Feb 27 '17 at 5:25












  • 1




    The as are the result of evaluating the elementary symmetric functions on the alphas.
    – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
    Feb 27 '17 at 4:47











  • I guess I know the answer now...how stupid I am...
    – CYC
    Feb 27 '17 at 4:57






  • 3




    I suggest you write a complete answer answering your question.
    – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
    Feb 27 '17 at 5:25







1




1




The as are the result of evaluating the elementary symmetric functions on the alphas.
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Feb 27 '17 at 4:47





The as are the result of evaluating the elementary symmetric functions on the alphas.
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Feb 27 '17 at 4:47













I guess I know the answer now...how stupid I am...
– CYC
Feb 27 '17 at 4:57




I guess I know the answer now...how stupid I am...
– CYC
Feb 27 '17 at 4:57




3




3




I suggest you write a complete answer answering your question.
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Feb 27 '17 at 5:25




I suggest you write a complete answer answering your question.
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Feb 27 '17 at 5:25










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










There's an $sigma$ sending $alpha$ to $alpha_i$ fixing $K$, hence $alpha_i$ are integral over $A$ since $alpha$ is, the rest is easy.






share|cite|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2163296%2fwhy-do-minimal-polynomial-have-coefficients-in-the-integral-closured-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted










    There's an $sigma$ sending $alpha$ to $alpha_i$ fixing $K$, hence $alpha_i$ are integral over $A$ since $alpha$ is, the rest is easy.






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      0
      down vote



      accepted










      There's an $sigma$ sending $alpha$ to $alpha_i$ fixing $K$, hence $alpha_i$ are integral over $A$ since $alpha$ is, the rest is easy.






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted






        There's an $sigma$ sending $alpha$ to $alpha_i$ fixing $K$, hence $alpha_i$ are integral over $A$ since $alpha$ is, the rest is easy.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        There's an $sigma$ sending $alpha$ to $alpha_i$ fixing $K$, hence $alpha_i$ are integral over $A$ since $alpha$ is, the rest is easy.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Sep 9 at 11:02









        CYC

        940711




        940711



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2163296%2fwhy-do-minimal-polynomial-have-coefficients-in-the-integral-closured-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

            Carbon dioxide