Selfish Primes Question

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Consider the series : $1,2,4,8,16,23,28,38,49,ldots $



( number + sum of its digits numbers gives the next number and continues up to infinity )



Now, consider the primes in this series ( the first ones $2,23,101,103,107 , ldots $)



Now, can you help with the following questions :



1) what is the reciprocal sum of primes in this series? ( my guess is around 0.7 which makes the series converges but how I can prove that ? )



2) How many consecutive primes can be found in this series? ( My guess is 7 or 8 , but still I am not able to prove this result, for example, 101,103,107 are the consecutive primes in the series )



3) It is believed that $fracx(ln x)^2$ roughly gives the number of twin primes and I suspect that that formula works for the number of primes in the series ( $1,2,4,8,16,23,28,38,ldots$ )



Any help will be appreciated. Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question























  • Welcome to MSE. For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., basic help on mathjax notation, mathjax tutorial and quick reference, main meta site math tutorial and equation editing how-to.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Sep 9 at 11:11






  • 1




    Where did this question come from? Are you taking a course? Doing research? Or is this just for fun?
    – Theo Bendit
    Sep 9 at 11:19










  • I have a master degree in number theory. The series actually known as Kaprekar series ( Indian math high school teacher lived 1950's) . I have been searching the answers of my question almost 2 years.
    – Turker
    Sep 9 at 11:28






  • 2




    3) seems plausible, since the sum of digits of $x$ is roughly $frac5ln 10ln x$, so the density of the sequence at $x$ is proportional to $frac1ln x$, so the density of primes in the sequence is proportional to $frac1(ln x)^2$. That would also imply that the sum of their reciprocals converges. I don't think you have a snowball's chance in hell to find the limit in closed form; I'm surprised you're hoping for that after doing a master in number theory.
    – joriki
    Sep 9 at 11:40











  • I just posted only 3 questions but more interesting questions related to this series about to come.
    – Turker
    Sep 9 at 18:11














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Consider the series : $1,2,4,8,16,23,28,38,49,ldots $



( number + sum of its digits numbers gives the next number and continues up to infinity )



Now, consider the primes in this series ( the first ones $2,23,101,103,107 , ldots $)



Now, can you help with the following questions :



1) what is the reciprocal sum of primes in this series? ( my guess is around 0.7 which makes the series converges but how I can prove that ? )



2) How many consecutive primes can be found in this series? ( My guess is 7 or 8 , but still I am not able to prove this result, for example, 101,103,107 are the consecutive primes in the series )



3) It is believed that $fracx(ln x)^2$ roughly gives the number of twin primes and I suspect that that formula works for the number of primes in the series ( $1,2,4,8,16,23,28,38,ldots$ )



Any help will be appreciated. Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question























  • Welcome to MSE. For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., basic help on mathjax notation, mathjax tutorial and quick reference, main meta site math tutorial and equation editing how-to.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Sep 9 at 11:11






  • 1




    Where did this question come from? Are you taking a course? Doing research? Or is this just for fun?
    – Theo Bendit
    Sep 9 at 11:19










  • I have a master degree in number theory. The series actually known as Kaprekar series ( Indian math high school teacher lived 1950's) . I have been searching the answers of my question almost 2 years.
    – Turker
    Sep 9 at 11:28






  • 2




    3) seems plausible, since the sum of digits of $x$ is roughly $frac5ln 10ln x$, so the density of the sequence at $x$ is proportional to $frac1ln x$, so the density of primes in the sequence is proportional to $frac1(ln x)^2$. That would also imply that the sum of their reciprocals converges. I don't think you have a snowball's chance in hell to find the limit in closed form; I'm surprised you're hoping for that after doing a master in number theory.
    – joriki
    Sep 9 at 11:40











  • I just posted only 3 questions but more interesting questions related to this series about to come.
    – Turker
    Sep 9 at 18:11












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Consider the series : $1,2,4,8,16,23,28,38,49,ldots $



( number + sum of its digits numbers gives the next number and continues up to infinity )



Now, consider the primes in this series ( the first ones $2,23,101,103,107 , ldots $)



Now, can you help with the following questions :



1) what is the reciprocal sum of primes in this series? ( my guess is around 0.7 which makes the series converges but how I can prove that ? )



2) How many consecutive primes can be found in this series? ( My guess is 7 or 8 , but still I am not able to prove this result, for example, 101,103,107 are the consecutive primes in the series )



3) It is believed that $fracx(ln x)^2$ roughly gives the number of twin primes and I suspect that that formula works for the number of primes in the series ( $1,2,4,8,16,23,28,38,ldots$ )



Any help will be appreciated. Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question















Consider the series : $1,2,4,8,16,23,28,38,49,ldots $



( number + sum of its digits numbers gives the next number and continues up to infinity )



Now, consider the primes in this series ( the first ones $2,23,101,103,107 , ldots $)



Now, can you help with the following questions :



1) what is the reciprocal sum of primes in this series? ( my guess is around 0.7 which makes the series converges but how I can prove that ? )



2) How many consecutive primes can be found in this series? ( My guess is 7 or 8 , but still I am not able to prove this result, for example, 101,103,107 are the consecutive primes in the series )



3) It is believed that $fracx(ln x)^2$ roughly gives the number of twin primes and I suspect that that formula works for the number of primes in the series ( $1,2,4,8,16,23,28,38,ldots$ )



Any help will be appreciated. Thank you.







number-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Sep 9 at 11:25









José Carlos Santos

123k17101186




123k17101186










asked Sep 9 at 11:06









Turker

6




6











  • Welcome to MSE. For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., basic help on mathjax notation, mathjax tutorial and quick reference, main meta site math tutorial and equation editing how-to.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Sep 9 at 11:11






  • 1




    Where did this question come from? Are you taking a course? Doing research? Or is this just for fun?
    – Theo Bendit
    Sep 9 at 11:19










  • I have a master degree in number theory. The series actually known as Kaprekar series ( Indian math high school teacher lived 1950's) . I have been searching the answers of my question almost 2 years.
    – Turker
    Sep 9 at 11:28






  • 2




    3) seems plausible, since the sum of digits of $x$ is roughly $frac5ln 10ln x$, so the density of the sequence at $x$ is proportional to $frac1ln x$, so the density of primes in the sequence is proportional to $frac1(ln x)^2$. That would also imply that the sum of their reciprocals converges. I don't think you have a snowball's chance in hell to find the limit in closed form; I'm surprised you're hoping for that after doing a master in number theory.
    – joriki
    Sep 9 at 11:40











  • I just posted only 3 questions but more interesting questions related to this series about to come.
    – Turker
    Sep 9 at 18:11
















  • Welcome to MSE. For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., basic help on mathjax notation, mathjax tutorial and quick reference, main meta site math tutorial and equation editing how-to.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Sep 9 at 11:11






  • 1




    Where did this question come from? Are you taking a course? Doing research? Or is this just for fun?
    – Theo Bendit
    Sep 9 at 11:19










  • I have a master degree in number theory. The series actually known as Kaprekar series ( Indian math high school teacher lived 1950's) . I have been searching the answers of my question almost 2 years.
    – Turker
    Sep 9 at 11:28






  • 2




    3) seems plausible, since the sum of digits of $x$ is roughly $frac5ln 10ln x$, so the density of the sequence at $x$ is proportional to $frac1ln x$, so the density of primes in the sequence is proportional to $frac1(ln x)^2$. That would also imply that the sum of their reciprocals converges. I don't think you have a snowball's chance in hell to find the limit in closed form; I'm surprised you're hoping for that after doing a master in number theory.
    – joriki
    Sep 9 at 11:40











  • I just posted only 3 questions but more interesting questions related to this series about to come.
    – Turker
    Sep 9 at 18:11















Welcome to MSE. For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., basic help on mathjax notation, mathjax tutorial and quick reference, main meta site math tutorial and equation editing how-to.
– José Carlos Santos
Sep 9 at 11:11




Welcome to MSE. For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., basic help on mathjax notation, mathjax tutorial and quick reference, main meta site math tutorial and equation editing how-to.
– José Carlos Santos
Sep 9 at 11:11




1




1




Where did this question come from? Are you taking a course? Doing research? Or is this just for fun?
– Theo Bendit
Sep 9 at 11:19




Where did this question come from? Are you taking a course? Doing research? Or is this just for fun?
– Theo Bendit
Sep 9 at 11:19












I have a master degree in number theory. The series actually known as Kaprekar series ( Indian math high school teacher lived 1950's) . I have been searching the answers of my question almost 2 years.
– Turker
Sep 9 at 11:28




I have a master degree in number theory. The series actually known as Kaprekar series ( Indian math high school teacher lived 1950's) . I have been searching the answers of my question almost 2 years.
– Turker
Sep 9 at 11:28




2




2




3) seems plausible, since the sum of digits of $x$ is roughly $frac5ln 10ln x$, so the density of the sequence at $x$ is proportional to $frac1ln x$, so the density of primes in the sequence is proportional to $frac1(ln x)^2$. That would also imply that the sum of their reciprocals converges. I don't think you have a snowball's chance in hell to find the limit in closed form; I'm surprised you're hoping for that after doing a master in number theory.
– joriki
Sep 9 at 11:40





3) seems plausible, since the sum of digits of $x$ is roughly $frac5ln 10ln x$, so the density of the sequence at $x$ is proportional to $frac1ln x$, so the density of primes in the sequence is proportional to $frac1(ln x)^2$. That would also imply that the sum of their reciprocals converges. I don't think you have a snowball's chance in hell to find the limit in closed form; I'm surprised you're hoping for that after doing a master in number theory.
– joriki
Sep 9 at 11:40













I just posted only 3 questions but more interesting questions related to this series about to come.
– Turker
Sep 9 at 18:11




I just posted only 3 questions but more interesting questions related to this series about to come.
– Turker
Sep 9 at 18:11















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2910679%2fselfish-primes-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2910679%2fselfish-primes-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

Carbon dioxide