Problem with UV mapping (single face dis formed)

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
4
down vote

favorite












I, in my opinion would not label my self as an advanced person with blender, so there may be something I am not doing or missing. I was trying to make a model when I stumbled upon a problem with UV mapping. I originally was not surprised as I often mess up UV mapping in some shape or form but this time it was different, a solid face with no brakes was being dis formed and i had no clue why. It cant be the seams because its one face, and I set the scale to 1,1,1. I still have yet to fix this problem or what or why its happening. the face and the respective UV mappingI would still consider my self new to blender and if anyone has a solution to my problem please inform me of any mistakes I have made. Thanks






uv







share|improve this question



























    up vote
    4
    down vote

    favorite












    I, in my opinion would not label my self as an advanced person with blender, so there may be something I am not doing or missing. I was trying to make a model when I stumbled upon a problem with UV mapping. I originally was not surprised as I often mess up UV mapping in some shape or form but this time it was different, a solid face with no brakes was being dis formed and i had no clue why. It cant be the seams because its one face, and I set the scale to 1,1,1. I still have yet to fix this problem or what or why its happening. the face and the respective UV mappingI would still consider my self new to blender and if anyone has a solution to my problem please inform me of any mistakes I have made. Thanks






    uv







    share|improve this question























      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite











      I, in my opinion would not label my self as an advanced person with blender, so there may be something I am not doing or missing. I was trying to make a model when I stumbled upon a problem with UV mapping. I originally was not surprised as I often mess up UV mapping in some shape or form but this time it was different, a solid face with no brakes was being dis formed and i had no clue why. It cant be the seams because its one face, and I set the scale to 1,1,1. I still have yet to fix this problem or what or why its happening. the face and the respective UV mappingI would still consider my self new to blender and if anyone has a solution to my problem please inform me of any mistakes I have made. Thanks






      uv







      share|improve this question













      I, in my opinion would not label my self as an advanced person with blender, so there may be something I am not doing or missing. I was trying to make a model when I stumbled upon a problem with UV mapping. I originally was not surprised as I often mess up UV mapping in some shape or form but this time it was different, a solid face with no brakes was being dis formed and i had no clue why. It cant be the seams because its one face, and I set the scale to 1,1,1. I still have yet to fix this problem or what or why its happening. the face and the respective UV mappingI would still consider my self new to blender and if anyone has a solution to my problem please inform me of any mistakes I have made. Thanks






      uv




      uv






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Sep 9 at 7:17









      Jeff Lingstien

      234




      234




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          5
          down vote



          accepted










          Use a different operator with N-gons



          N-gons are very handy, but they come at the cost of not having a precisely defined topology between the vertices. Blender is struggling to recognize the shape of the surface, the proportion of each branch, with the Unwrap operator due to the algorithm that's behind it.



          I'll suggest to simply use another operator for this specific task, for example the Smart UV Project operator:



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer






















          • I tried it and it work, however should I use smart UV unwrap for the rest or alternate.
            – Jeff Lingstien
            Sep 9 at 17:42










          • There is usually no need to use the same operator for all. Choose the one that best suit your needs.
            – Carlo
            Sep 9 at 19:07











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "502"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fblender.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f117983%2fproblem-with-uv-mapping-single-face-dis-formed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest

















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          5
          down vote



          accepted










          Use a different operator with N-gons



          N-gons are very handy, but they come at the cost of not having a precisely defined topology between the vertices. Blender is struggling to recognize the shape of the surface, the proportion of each branch, with the Unwrap operator due to the algorithm that's behind it.



          I'll suggest to simply use another operator for this specific task, for example the Smart UV Project operator:



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer






















          • I tried it and it work, however should I use smart UV unwrap for the rest or alternate.
            – Jeff Lingstien
            Sep 9 at 17:42










          • There is usually no need to use the same operator for all. Choose the one that best suit your needs.
            – Carlo
            Sep 9 at 19:07















          up vote
          5
          down vote



          accepted










          Use a different operator with N-gons



          N-gons are very handy, but they come at the cost of not having a precisely defined topology between the vertices. Blender is struggling to recognize the shape of the surface, the proportion of each branch, with the Unwrap operator due to the algorithm that's behind it.



          I'll suggest to simply use another operator for this specific task, for example the Smart UV Project operator:



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer






















          • I tried it and it work, however should I use smart UV unwrap for the rest or alternate.
            – Jeff Lingstien
            Sep 9 at 17:42










          • There is usually no need to use the same operator for all. Choose the one that best suit your needs.
            – Carlo
            Sep 9 at 19:07













          up vote
          5
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          5
          down vote



          accepted






          Use a different operator with N-gons



          N-gons are very handy, but they come at the cost of not having a precisely defined topology between the vertices. Blender is struggling to recognize the shape of the surface, the proportion of each branch, with the Unwrap operator due to the algorithm that's behind it.



          I'll suggest to simply use another operator for this specific task, for example the Smart UV Project operator:



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer














          Use a different operator with N-gons



          N-gons are very handy, but they come at the cost of not having a precisely defined topology between the vertices. Blender is struggling to recognize the shape of the surface, the proportion of each branch, with the Unwrap operator due to the algorithm that's behind it.



          I'll suggest to simply use another operator for this specific task, for example the Smart UV Project operator:



          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Sep 9 at 10:35

























          answered Sep 9 at 7:57









          Carlo

          18.4k12559




          18.4k12559











          • I tried it and it work, however should I use smart UV unwrap for the rest or alternate.
            – Jeff Lingstien
            Sep 9 at 17:42










          • There is usually no need to use the same operator for all. Choose the one that best suit your needs.
            – Carlo
            Sep 9 at 19:07

















          • I tried it and it work, however should I use smart UV unwrap for the rest or alternate.
            – Jeff Lingstien
            Sep 9 at 17:42










          • There is usually no need to use the same operator for all. Choose the one that best suit your needs.
            – Carlo
            Sep 9 at 19:07
















          I tried it and it work, however should I use smart UV unwrap for the rest or alternate.
          – Jeff Lingstien
          Sep 9 at 17:42




          I tried it and it work, however should I use smart UV unwrap for the rest or alternate.
          – Jeff Lingstien
          Sep 9 at 17:42












          There is usually no need to use the same operator for all. Choose the one that best suit your needs.
          – Carlo
          Sep 9 at 19:07





          There is usually no need to use the same operator for all. Choose the one that best suit your needs.
          – Carlo
          Sep 9 at 19:07


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fblender.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f117983%2fproblem-with-uv-mapping-single-face-dis-formed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest
































































          -

          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

          圖片
          up vote 0 down vote favorite My code workes perfectly for other queries, but for one query I am infinitely getting the same tweet. I can't understand what the problem is. API call: query='Allergic asthma OR Nonallergic asthma OR Occupational asthma OR EIB OR Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction OR Nocturnal asthma OR Cough-variant asthma' new_tweets = api.search(q=searchQuery, count=100, since_id=since_id, lang='en',tweet_mode='extended') if not new_tweets: print("No more tweets found") break for tweet in new_tweets: if True: print(jsonpickle.encode(tweet._json, unpicklable=False)) my_file = open('searchTweets.txt','a') my_file.write(jsonpickle.encode(tweet._json, unpicklable=False)+'n') my_file.close() else: continue Output in file: https://pastebin.com/JmRCsTeE These are the JSONs of the same Tweet. Other queries that work: Breast cancer OR Prostate cancer OR Colon cancer OR Lung cancer Type 2 dia
          閱讀完整內容

          Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

          圖片
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 0 down vote favorite 1 $$int_0^1 (1+(x^-p-1)^1-p)^frac1pdx, pin mathbbR, pge 1$$ I find that $x=0,1$ are singular points(discontinuous points of this integral), is there a way to eliminate those singular points to make sure that this integral can be calculated by hand or by Taylor approximations. In either cases, what are those steps of calculating the integral? calculus real-analysis analysis approximation share | cite | improve this question edited Sep 11 at 5:07 asked Sep 11 at 4:48 Mclalalala 126 8 1 What is $p$? Please give more information to make it complete. – xbh Sep 11 at 5:02 @xbh already fixed it, thanks for reminding. – Mclalalala Sep 11 at 5:10 Seems that $0$ is not singular here… [I might compute wrong] – xbh Sep 11 at 5:30 @xbh can you show me how to get the close formula for the integral above? – Mclalalala Sep 11 at 5:33
          閱讀完整內容

          Strongly p-embedded subgroups and p-Sylow subgroups.

          圖片
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite Let $G$ be a finite group and $p$ a prime number. Recall that a subgroup $H$ of $G$ is strongly $p$-embedded if $p | |H|,$ and for each $x in G setminus H,$ $H cap ^xH$ has order prime to $p,$ where $^xH$ denotes the group we get after conjugation by $x.$ I am reading a proof which claims that any strongly $p$-embedded group contains a $p$-Sylow group of $G$. I can prove this fact by other means, but I would like to understand the proof I am reading. This is the argument I am reading: Assume $H$ is strongly $p$-embedded. Since $p | |H|,$ $p$ contains an element $g$ of order $p.$ Choose any $S in Syl_p(G)$ such that $g in S.$ For $x in Z(S)$ of order $p,$ $$g in H cap ^xH$$ implies $x in H.$ Hence for all $y in S,$ $$x in H cap ^yH $$ implies that $y in H.$ Thus $S subset H.$ Here is what I do not understand with the proof: Why does it matter that $x in Z(S)$ has order $p?$ It seems to me that for any $x in Z(S),$
          閱讀完整內容