Find the coordinates of the points $A$ and $B$ on the lines $l_1$ and $l_2$ respectively such that $vecAB$ is perpendicular to $l_1$ and $l_2$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












The vector $l_1$ is given as
$$
l_1 : mathbfr =
left(
beginmatrix
-3\-4\6
endmatrix
right); + lambda
left(
beginmatrix
-3\-4\6
endmatrix
right)
$$
and $l_2$ as
$$
l_2: fracx-4-3=fracy+74=-(z+3)
$$



So far I've gotten an equation for each $(x,y,z)$ of $l_1$ and $l_2$ and then multiplied them to get a scalar product however I'm having issues finding the values of $lambda$ and $nu$ (Cartesian multiplier of $l_2$) through the simultaneous equations of finding the scalar product (when it's equal to $0$).



My approach, at least so far has given,
$$
vecOB = left(beginmatrix
4\
-7\
-3
endmatrixright)+nu
left(beginmatrix
-3\
4\
-1
endmatrixright)
$$
$$
vecAB = vecOB-vecAB
$$
Therefore
$$
vecAB = left(beginmatrix
1\
3\
9
endmatrixright)+
left(beginmatrix
-3nu - 3lambda\
4nu - 2lambda\
-nu + 2lambda
endmatrixright)
$$
$$
x = 1 -3nu - 3 lambda,; y = -3 + 4nu - 2lambda, ; z=-9+nu + 2lambda
$$
Then solving for the two dot products,
$$
vecAB ; cdot ; l_1, ; vecAB ; cdot ; l_2
$$
I get
$$
26nu^2-17lambda^2 = 0
$$
Which I have no idea how to solve. The response was too long for the comment section.










share|cite|improve this question























  • Your method is right. What issue do you find?
    – Yuta
    Sep 9 at 13:12










  • Couldn't simplify further than having two composite quadratics, perhaps I made an arithmetic mistake but I don't see it after going through many times.
    – John Miller
    Sep 9 at 13:18











  • There should not be any quadratic terms. Can you show some detail of your steps?
    – Yuta
    Sep 9 at 13:21










  • @Yuta I have edited my answer.
    – John Miller
    Sep 9 at 13:50










  • Since $ABperp l_1$ and $ABperp l_2$, dot products should be considered instead.
    – Yuta
    Sep 9 at 13:53














up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












The vector $l_1$ is given as
$$
l_1 : mathbfr =
left(
beginmatrix
-3\-4\6
endmatrix
right); + lambda
left(
beginmatrix
-3\-4\6
endmatrix
right)
$$
and $l_2$ as
$$
l_2: fracx-4-3=fracy+74=-(z+3)
$$



So far I've gotten an equation for each $(x,y,z)$ of $l_1$ and $l_2$ and then multiplied them to get a scalar product however I'm having issues finding the values of $lambda$ and $nu$ (Cartesian multiplier of $l_2$) through the simultaneous equations of finding the scalar product (when it's equal to $0$).



My approach, at least so far has given,
$$
vecOB = left(beginmatrix
4\
-7\
-3
endmatrixright)+nu
left(beginmatrix
-3\
4\
-1
endmatrixright)
$$
$$
vecAB = vecOB-vecAB
$$
Therefore
$$
vecAB = left(beginmatrix
1\
3\
9
endmatrixright)+
left(beginmatrix
-3nu - 3lambda\
4nu - 2lambda\
-nu + 2lambda
endmatrixright)
$$
$$
x = 1 -3nu - 3 lambda,; y = -3 + 4nu - 2lambda, ; z=-9+nu + 2lambda
$$
Then solving for the two dot products,
$$
vecAB ; cdot ; l_1, ; vecAB ; cdot ; l_2
$$
I get
$$
26nu^2-17lambda^2 = 0
$$
Which I have no idea how to solve. The response was too long for the comment section.










share|cite|improve this question























  • Your method is right. What issue do you find?
    – Yuta
    Sep 9 at 13:12










  • Couldn't simplify further than having two composite quadratics, perhaps I made an arithmetic mistake but I don't see it after going through many times.
    – John Miller
    Sep 9 at 13:18











  • There should not be any quadratic terms. Can you show some detail of your steps?
    – Yuta
    Sep 9 at 13:21










  • @Yuta I have edited my answer.
    – John Miller
    Sep 9 at 13:50










  • Since $ABperp l_1$ and $ABperp l_2$, dot products should be considered instead.
    – Yuta
    Sep 9 at 13:53












up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1






1





The vector $l_1$ is given as
$$
l_1 : mathbfr =
left(
beginmatrix
-3\-4\6
endmatrix
right); + lambda
left(
beginmatrix
-3\-4\6
endmatrix
right)
$$
and $l_2$ as
$$
l_2: fracx-4-3=fracy+74=-(z+3)
$$



So far I've gotten an equation for each $(x,y,z)$ of $l_1$ and $l_2$ and then multiplied them to get a scalar product however I'm having issues finding the values of $lambda$ and $nu$ (Cartesian multiplier of $l_2$) through the simultaneous equations of finding the scalar product (when it's equal to $0$).



My approach, at least so far has given,
$$
vecOB = left(beginmatrix
4\
-7\
-3
endmatrixright)+nu
left(beginmatrix
-3\
4\
-1
endmatrixright)
$$
$$
vecAB = vecOB-vecAB
$$
Therefore
$$
vecAB = left(beginmatrix
1\
3\
9
endmatrixright)+
left(beginmatrix
-3nu - 3lambda\
4nu - 2lambda\
-nu + 2lambda
endmatrixright)
$$
$$
x = 1 -3nu - 3 lambda,; y = -3 + 4nu - 2lambda, ; z=-9+nu + 2lambda
$$
Then solving for the two dot products,
$$
vecAB ; cdot ; l_1, ; vecAB ; cdot ; l_2
$$
I get
$$
26nu^2-17lambda^2 = 0
$$
Which I have no idea how to solve. The response was too long for the comment section.










share|cite|improve this question















The vector $l_1$ is given as
$$
l_1 : mathbfr =
left(
beginmatrix
-3\-4\6
endmatrix
right); + lambda
left(
beginmatrix
-3\-4\6
endmatrix
right)
$$
and $l_2$ as
$$
l_2: fracx-4-3=fracy+74=-(z+3)
$$



So far I've gotten an equation for each $(x,y,z)$ of $l_1$ and $l_2$ and then multiplied them to get a scalar product however I'm having issues finding the values of $lambda$ and $nu$ (Cartesian multiplier of $l_2$) through the simultaneous equations of finding the scalar product (when it's equal to $0$).



My approach, at least so far has given,
$$
vecOB = left(beginmatrix
4\
-7\
-3
endmatrixright)+nu
left(beginmatrix
-3\
4\
-1
endmatrixright)
$$
$$
vecAB = vecOB-vecAB
$$
Therefore
$$
vecAB = left(beginmatrix
1\
3\
9
endmatrixright)+
left(beginmatrix
-3nu - 3lambda\
4nu - 2lambda\
-nu + 2lambda
endmatrixright)
$$
$$
x = 1 -3nu - 3 lambda,; y = -3 + 4nu - 2lambda, ; z=-9+nu + 2lambda
$$
Then solving for the two dot products,
$$
vecAB ; cdot ; l_1, ; vecAB ; cdot ; l_2
$$
I get
$$
26nu^2-17lambda^2 = 0
$$
Which I have no idea how to solve. The response was too long for the comment section.







vectors analytic-geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Sep 9 at 15:34

























asked Sep 9 at 12:50









John Miller

1236




1236











  • Your method is right. What issue do you find?
    – Yuta
    Sep 9 at 13:12










  • Couldn't simplify further than having two composite quadratics, perhaps I made an arithmetic mistake but I don't see it after going through many times.
    – John Miller
    Sep 9 at 13:18











  • There should not be any quadratic terms. Can you show some detail of your steps?
    – Yuta
    Sep 9 at 13:21










  • @Yuta I have edited my answer.
    – John Miller
    Sep 9 at 13:50










  • Since $ABperp l_1$ and $ABperp l_2$, dot products should be considered instead.
    – Yuta
    Sep 9 at 13:53
















  • Your method is right. What issue do you find?
    – Yuta
    Sep 9 at 13:12










  • Couldn't simplify further than having two composite quadratics, perhaps I made an arithmetic mistake but I don't see it after going through many times.
    – John Miller
    Sep 9 at 13:18











  • There should not be any quadratic terms. Can you show some detail of your steps?
    – Yuta
    Sep 9 at 13:21










  • @Yuta I have edited my answer.
    – John Miller
    Sep 9 at 13:50










  • Since $ABperp l_1$ and $ABperp l_2$, dot products should be considered instead.
    – Yuta
    Sep 9 at 13:53















Your method is right. What issue do you find?
– Yuta
Sep 9 at 13:12




Your method is right. What issue do you find?
– Yuta
Sep 9 at 13:12












Couldn't simplify further than having two composite quadratics, perhaps I made an arithmetic mistake but I don't see it after going through many times.
– John Miller
Sep 9 at 13:18





Couldn't simplify further than having two composite quadratics, perhaps I made an arithmetic mistake but I don't see it after going through many times.
– John Miller
Sep 9 at 13:18













There should not be any quadratic terms. Can you show some detail of your steps?
– Yuta
Sep 9 at 13:21




There should not be any quadratic terms. Can you show some detail of your steps?
– Yuta
Sep 9 at 13:21












@Yuta I have edited my answer.
– John Miller
Sep 9 at 13:50




@Yuta I have edited my answer.
– John Miller
Sep 9 at 13:50












Since $ABperp l_1$ and $ABperp l_2$, dot products should be considered instead.
– Yuta
Sep 9 at 13:53




Since $ABperp l_1$ and $ABperp l_2$, dot products should be considered instead.
– Yuta
Sep 9 at 13:53










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










A (slightly) different approach:



$l_2$ is defined as the intersection of the planes $x-3z=7$ and $y+4z=-19$, with normal vectors $vec n=(1,0,-3)$ and $vec n'=(0,1,4)$ respectively. Therefore, a directing vector of $l_2$ is the cross-product $vec u_2=vec ntimesvec n'$.



Let $vec u_1=(-3,-4,6)$ the given directing vector of $l_1$. A directing vector of the common perpendicular of $l_1$ and $l_2$ is the cross-product
$$vec v=vec u_1timesvec u_2. $$
Thus, to find points $A$ on $l_1$ and $B$ on $l_2$ so that the line $(AB)$ is perpendicular to $l_1$ and $l_2$, we have to find a point $A$ (given by the parametric equation) and $t$ so the point
$$B=A+tvec v= A+t(vec u_1timesvec u_2)$$
satisfies the equations of line $l_2$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • @John Miller: Where did you find 3 equations and 7 variables? You should obtain the two equations which define $l_2$ and two unknowns, $lambda$ and $t$.
    – Bernard
    Sep 9 at 16:22










  • sorry I never wrote it on paper as I was in the car but I have solved the question thank you.
    – John Miller
    Sep 9 at 18:08










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2910753%2ffind-the-coordinates-of-the-points-a-and-b-on-the-lines-l-1-and-l-2-resp%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










A (slightly) different approach:



$l_2$ is defined as the intersection of the planes $x-3z=7$ and $y+4z=-19$, with normal vectors $vec n=(1,0,-3)$ and $vec n'=(0,1,4)$ respectively. Therefore, a directing vector of $l_2$ is the cross-product $vec u_2=vec ntimesvec n'$.



Let $vec u_1=(-3,-4,6)$ the given directing vector of $l_1$. A directing vector of the common perpendicular of $l_1$ and $l_2$ is the cross-product
$$vec v=vec u_1timesvec u_2. $$
Thus, to find points $A$ on $l_1$ and $B$ on $l_2$ so that the line $(AB)$ is perpendicular to $l_1$ and $l_2$, we have to find a point $A$ (given by the parametric equation) and $t$ so the point
$$B=A+tvec v= A+t(vec u_1timesvec u_2)$$
satisfies the equations of line $l_2$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • @John Miller: Where did you find 3 equations and 7 variables? You should obtain the two equations which define $l_2$ and two unknowns, $lambda$ and $t$.
    – Bernard
    Sep 9 at 16:22










  • sorry I never wrote it on paper as I was in the car but I have solved the question thank you.
    – John Miller
    Sep 9 at 18:08














up vote
1
down vote



accepted










A (slightly) different approach:



$l_2$ is defined as the intersection of the planes $x-3z=7$ and $y+4z=-19$, with normal vectors $vec n=(1,0,-3)$ and $vec n'=(0,1,4)$ respectively. Therefore, a directing vector of $l_2$ is the cross-product $vec u_2=vec ntimesvec n'$.



Let $vec u_1=(-3,-4,6)$ the given directing vector of $l_1$. A directing vector of the common perpendicular of $l_1$ and $l_2$ is the cross-product
$$vec v=vec u_1timesvec u_2. $$
Thus, to find points $A$ on $l_1$ and $B$ on $l_2$ so that the line $(AB)$ is perpendicular to $l_1$ and $l_2$, we have to find a point $A$ (given by the parametric equation) and $t$ so the point
$$B=A+tvec v= A+t(vec u_1timesvec u_2)$$
satisfies the equations of line $l_2$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • @John Miller: Where did you find 3 equations and 7 variables? You should obtain the two equations which define $l_2$ and two unknowns, $lambda$ and $t$.
    – Bernard
    Sep 9 at 16:22










  • sorry I never wrote it on paper as I was in the car but I have solved the question thank you.
    – John Miller
    Sep 9 at 18:08












up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






A (slightly) different approach:



$l_2$ is defined as the intersection of the planes $x-3z=7$ and $y+4z=-19$, with normal vectors $vec n=(1,0,-3)$ and $vec n'=(0,1,4)$ respectively. Therefore, a directing vector of $l_2$ is the cross-product $vec u_2=vec ntimesvec n'$.



Let $vec u_1=(-3,-4,6)$ the given directing vector of $l_1$. A directing vector of the common perpendicular of $l_1$ and $l_2$ is the cross-product
$$vec v=vec u_1timesvec u_2. $$
Thus, to find points $A$ on $l_1$ and $B$ on $l_2$ so that the line $(AB)$ is perpendicular to $l_1$ and $l_2$, we have to find a point $A$ (given by the parametric equation) and $t$ so the point
$$B=A+tvec v= A+t(vec u_1timesvec u_2)$$
satisfies the equations of line $l_2$.






share|cite|improve this answer












A (slightly) different approach:



$l_2$ is defined as the intersection of the planes $x-3z=7$ and $y+4z=-19$, with normal vectors $vec n=(1,0,-3)$ and $vec n'=(0,1,4)$ respectively. Therefore, a directing vector of $l_2$ is the cross-product $vec u_2=vec ntimesvec n'$.



Let $vec u_1=(-3,-4,6)$ the given directing vector of $l_1$. A directing vector of the common perpendicular of $l_1$ and $l_2$ is the cross-product
$$vec v=vec u_1timesvec u_2. $$
Thus, to find points $A$ on $l_1$ and $B$ on $l_2$ so that the line $(AB)$ is perpendicular to $l_1$ and $l_2$, we have to find a point $A$ (given by the parametric equation) and $t$ so the point
$$B=A+tvec v= A+t(vec u_1timesvec u_2)$$
satisfies the equations of line $l_2$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Sep 9 at 13:26









Bernard

112k636105




112k636105











  • @John Miller: Where did you find 3 equations and 7 variables? You should obtain the two equations which define $l_2$ and two unknowns, $lambda$ and $t$.
    – Bernard
    Sep 9 at 16:22










  • sorry I never wrote it on paper as I was in the car but I have solved the question thank you.
    – John Miller
    Sep 9 at 18:08
















  • @John Miller: Where did you find 3 equations and 7 variables? You should obtain the two equations which define $l_2$ and two unknowns, $lambda$ and $t$.
    – Bernard
    Sep 9 at 16:22










  • sorry I never wrote it on paper as I was in the car but I have solved the question thank you.
    – John Miller
    Sep 9 at 18:08















@John Miller: Where did you find 3 equations and 7 variables? You should obtain the two equations which define $l_2$ and two unknowns, $lambda$ and $t$.
– Bernard
Sep 9 at 16:22




@John Miller: Where did you find 3 equations and 7 variables? You should obtain the two equations which define $l_2$ and two unknowns, $lambda$ and $t$.
– Bernard
Sep 9 at 16:22












sorry I never wrote it on paper as I was in the car but I have solved the question thank you.
– John Miller
Sep 9 at 18:08




sorry I never wrote it on paper as I was in the car but I have solved the question thank you.
– John Miller
Sep 9 at 18:08

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2910753%2ffind-the-coordinates-of-the-points-a-and-b-on-the-lines-l-1-and-l-2-resp%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

Strongly p-embedded subgroups and p-Sylow subgroups.