Relation between non-vanishing Vector Fields on $mathbbT^2$ and Fundamental Group Maps

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
14
down vote

favorite
2












Let X be a vector field on $mathbb T^2$, we say that $varphi: mathbb R to mathbb T^2$ is a periodic orbit of $X $, if $varphi $ is a periodic function and $varphi'(t) = X (varphi(t)), forall t in mathbb R $.



Let $H: TmathbbT^2 to mathbbT^2 timesmathbbR^2$ be a parallelization of $mathbbT^2$, i.e; $H$ is a smooth function such that $H(p,v) = (p, A(p) v)$, where $A(p)$ is a isomophism between $T_pmathbbT^2$ and $mathbbR^2$ definided in the following way:



Consider $mathbbT^2 = mathbbR^2 / mathbbZ^2$ (flat torus), then for each point $[(x,y)]inmathbbT^2$ there are two loops $[(x+t,y)]$ and $[(x,y+t)]$, we define $A([(x,y)])$ as the unique linear transformation between $T_[(x,y)] mathbb T^2$ and $mathbb R^2$ satisfying



$$A([(x,y)]) left.fracddt [(x+t,y)]right|_t=0 = (1,0) quadtextand,quad A([(x,y)]) left.fracddt [(x,y+t)]right|_t=0 = (0,1). $$



I'm having trouble to solve the following exercise (This exercise can be found on page 6 of the book "The dynamics of vector fields in dimension 3-Etienne Ghys").




Exercise: Suppose $X$ is a non-singular vector field on $mathbbT^2$, and consider $X^∗$
as the map $$ X^*: pi_1left(mathbbT^2, x_0right) to pi_1 left(mathbbR^2 setminus 0, A(x_0)X(x_0) right)$$
$$left[alpha(t)right] mapsto left[A(alpha(t)) X(alpha(t))right] $$
If $X^*$ is a non-trivial homomorphism then $X$
has a periodic orbit.




I was trying to show that if $X$ doesn't admit a periodic orbit, then for every loop $varphi$ we have $A(varphi(t)) X(varphi(t))$ homotopic to a constant curve, but I wasn't able to conclude such thing.



Can anyone help me or can give me some hint?




Update



I noticed that if there exists $alpha_1,alpha_2:mathbbS^1to mathbbT^2$, such that $[alpha_1]$ and $[alpha_2]$ are generators of $pi_1(mathbbT^2,x_0)$ and $ alpha_i'(t),X(alpha_i(t))$ is a basis of $T_alpha_i(t) mathbbT^2$, then $A(alpha_i(t)) X(alpha_i(t))$ is homotopic to $A(alpha_i(t)) alpha'_i (t) $ (the homotopy
$$tildeH(s,t) = A(alpha_i(s))left( (1-t) X(alpha_i(s)) + t alpha_i'(s) right) $$
do the job).



And is relatively easy to demonstrate that $A(alpha_i(t)) alpha'_i (t)$ is homotopic to the constant map. (I realized that this homotopy doesn't work because it doesn't fix the ends of the interval)



Does anyone know if $X$ is a non-singular vector field on $mathbbT^2$ without periodic orbits then there are $alpha_1$ and $alpha_2$ as described above?




I think it's important to inform that in the chapter that this exercise is contained there is the following theorem




Theorem: Every non-singular $mathcalC^2$ vector field on a compact
surface that has no periodic orbits is topologically equivalent to a linear
flow on $mathbbT^2$ with irrational slope




I think that the key to solving the exercise is in the above theorem but I wasn't able to figure out how to do this.







share|cite|improve this question






















  • My impression is that your own reply in mathoverflow.net/questions/303616/… suffices. No need for more regular conjugacies.
    – John B
    Jun 27 at 20:03










  • @JohnB Sorry, I'm a bit confused. Are you saying that the fact of $X$ is equivalent to the irrational flow on $mathbbT^2$ imply this result?
    – Matheus Manzatto
    Jun 27 at 20:49










  • Sure, the irrational flow in linear in the flat metric.
    – John B
    Jun 27 at 20:53










  • @JohnB ok, if $X$ is a non-vanishing vector field and has no periodic orbits then $X$ equivalent to the irrational flow then $X$ has no periodic orbits. But how this assertion implies that the map $X^*$ is the trivial homomorphism? What I'm trying to say is that isn't obvious to me why this result (about the equivalence of vector fields) solves the exercise. Could you explain me, please?
    – Matheus Manzatto
    Jun 27 at 21:08














up vote
14
down vote

favorite
2












Let X be a vector field on $mathbb T^2$, we say that $varphi: mathbb R to mathbb T^2$ is a periodic orbit of $X $, if $varphi $ is a periodic function and $varphi'(t) = X (varphi(t)), forall t in mathbb R $.



Let $H: TmathbbT^2 to mathbbT^2 timesmathbbR^2$ be a parallelization of $mathbbT^2$, i.e; $H$ is a smooth function such that $H(p,v) = (p, A(p) v)$, where $A(p)$ is a isomophism between $T_pmathbbT^2$ and $mathbbR^2$ definided in the following way:



Consider $mathbbT^2 = mathbbR^2 / mathbbZ^2$ (flat torus), then for each point $[(x,y)]inmathbbT^2$ there are two loops $[(x+t,y)]$ and $[(x,y+t)]$, we define $A([(x,y)])$ as the unique linear transformation between $T_[(x,y)] mathbb T^2$ and $mathbb R^2$ satisfying



$$A([(x,y)]) left.fracddt [(x+t,y)]right|_t=0 = (1,0) quadtextand,quad A([(x,y)]) left.fracddt [(x,y+t)]right|_t=0 = (0,1). $$



I'm having trouble to solve the following exercise (This exercise can be found on page 6 of the book "The dynamics of vector fields in dimension 3-Etienne Ghys").




Exercise: Suppose $X$ is a non-singular vector field on $mathbbT^2$, and consider $X^∗$
as the map $$ X^*: pi_1left(mathbbT^2, x_0right) to pi_1 left(mathbbR^2 setminus 0, A(x_0)X(x_0) right)$$
$$left[alpha(t)right] mapsto left[A(alpha(t)) X(alpha(t))right] $$
If $X^*$ is a non-trivial homomorphism then $X$
has a periodic orbit.




I was trying to show that if $X$ doesn't admit a periodic orbit, then for every loop $varphi$ we have $A(varphi(t)) X(varphi(t))$ homotopic to a constant curve, but I wasn't able to conclude such thing.



Can anyone help me or can give me some hint?




Update



I noticed that if there exists $alpha_1,alpha_2:mathbbS^1to mathbbT^2$, such that $[alpha_1]$ and $[alpha_2]$ are generators of $pi_1(mathbbT^2,x_0)$ and $ alpha_i'(t),X(alpha_i(t))$ is a basis of $T_alpha_i(t) mathbbT^2$, then $A(alpha_i(t)) X(alpha_i(t))$ is homotopic to $A(alpha_i(t)) alpha'_i (t) $ (the homotopy
$$tildeH(s,t) = A(alpha_i(s))left( (1-t) X(alpha_i(s)) + t alpha_i'(s) right) $$
do the job).



And is relatively easy to demonstrate that $A(alpha_i(t)) alpha'_i (t)$ is homotopic to the constant map. (I realized that this homotopy doesn't work because it doesn't fix the ends of the interval)



Does anyone know if $X$ is a non-singular vector field on $mathbbT^2$ without periodic orbits then there are $alpha_1$ and $alpha_2$ as described above?




I think it's important to inform that in the chapter that this exercise is contained there is the following theorem




Theorem: Every non-singular $mathcalC^2$ vector field on a compact
surface that has no periodic orbits is topologically equivalent to a linear
flow on $mathbbT^2$ with irrational slope




I think that the key to solving the exercise is in the above theorem but I wasn't able to figure out how to do this.







share|cite|improve this question






















  • My impression is that your own reply in mathoverflow.net/questions/303616/… suffices. No need for more regular conjugacies.
    – John B
    Jun 27 at 20:03










  • @JohnB Sorry, I'm a bit confused. Are you saying that the fact of $X$ is equivalent to the irrational flow on $mathbbT^2$ imply this result?
    – Matheus Manzatto
    Jun 27 at 20:49










  • Sure, the irrational flow in linear in the flat metric.
    – John B
    Jun 27 at 20:53










  • @JohnB ok, if $X$ is a non-vanishing vector field and has no periodic orbits then $X$ equivalent to the irrational flow then $X$ has no periodic orbits. But how this assertion implies that the map $X^*$ is the trivial homomorphism? What I'm trying to say is that isn't obvious to me why this result (about the equivalence of vector fields) solves the exercise. Could you explain me, please?
    – Matheus Manzatto
    Jun 27 at 21:08












up vote
14
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
14
down vote

favorite
2






2





Let X be a vector field on $mathbb T^2$, we say that $varphi: mathbb R to mathbb T^2$ is a periodic orbit of $X $, if $varphi $ is a periodic function and $varphi'(t) = X (varphi(t)), forall t in mathbb R $.



Let $H: TmathbbT^2 to mathbbT^2 timesmathbbR^2$ be a parallelization of $mathbbT^2$, i.e; $H$ is a smooth function such that $H(p,v) = (p, A(p) v)$, where $A(p)$ is a isomophism between $T_pmathbbT^2$ and $mathbbR^2$ definided in the following way:



Consider $mathbbT^2 = mathbbR^2 / mathbbZ^2$ (flat torus), then for each point $[(x,y)]inmathbbT^2$ there are two loops $[(x+t,y)]$ and $[(x,y+t)]$, we define $A([(x,y)])$ as the unique linear transformation between $T_[(x,y)] mathbb T^2$ and $mathbb R^2$ satisfying



$$A([(x,y)]) left.fracddt [(x+t,y)]right|_t=0 = (1,0) quadtextand,quad A([(x,y)]) left.fracddt [(x,y+t)]right|_t=0 = (0,1). $$



I'm having trouble to solve the following exercise (This exercise can be found on page 6 of the book "The dynamics of vector fields in dimension 3-Etienne Ghys").




Exercise: Suppose $X$ is a non-singular vector field on $mathbbT^2$, and consider $X^∗$
as the map $$ X^*: pi_1left(mathbbT^2, x_0right) to pi_1 left(mathbbR^2 setminus 0, A(x_0)X(x_0) right)$$
$$left[alpha(t)right] mapsto left[A(alpha(t)) X(alpha(t))right] $$
If $X^*$ is a non-trivial homomorphism then $X$
has a periodic orbit.




I was trying to show that if $X$ doesn't admit a periodic orbit, then for every loop $varphi$ we have $A(varphi(t)) X(varphi(t))$ homotopic to a constant curve, but I wasn't able to conclude such thing.



Can anyone help me or can give me some hint?




Update



I noticed that if there exists $alpha_1,alpha_2:mathbbS^1to mathbbT^2$, such that $[alpha_1]$ and $[alpha_2]$ are generators of $pi_1(mathbbT^2,x_0)$ and $ alpha_i'(t),X(alpha_i(t))$ is a basis of $T_alpha_i(t) mathbbT^2$, then $A(alpha_i(t)) X(alpha_i(t))$ is homotopic to $A(alpha_i(t)) alpha'_i (t) $ (the homotopy
$$tildeH(s,t) = A(alpha_i(s))left( (1-t) X(alpha_i(s)) + t alpha_i'(s) right) $$
do the job).



And is relatively easy to demonstrate that $A(alpha_i(t)) alpha'_i (t)$ is homotopic to the constant map. (I realized that this homotopy doesn't work because it doesn't fix the ends of the interval)



Does anyone know if $X$ is a non-singular vector field on $mathbbT^2$ without periodic orbits then there are $alpha_1$ and $alpha_2$ as described above?




I think it's important to inform that in the chapter that this exercise is contained there is the following theorem




Theorem: Every non-singular $mathcalC^2$ vector field on a compact
surface that has no periodic orbits is topologically equivalent to a linear
flow on $mathbbT^2$ with irrational slope




I think that the key to solving the exercise is in the above theorem but I wasn't able to figure out how to do this.







share|cite|improve this question














Let X be a vector field on $mathbb T^2$, we say that $varphi: mathbb R to mathbb T^2$ is a periodic orbit of $X $, if $varphi $ is a periodic function and $varphi'(t) = X (varphi(t)), forall t in mathbb R $.



Let $H: TmathbbT^2 to mathbbT^2 timesmathbbR^2$ be a parallelization of $mathbbT^2$, i.e; $H$ is a smooth function such that $H(p,v) = (p, A(p) v)$, where $A(p)$ is a isomophism between $T_pmathbbT^2$ and $mathbbR^2$ definided in the following way:



Consider $mathbbT^2 = mathbbR^2 / mathbbZ^2$ (flat torus), then for each point $[(x,y)]inmathbbT^2$ there are two loops $[(x+t,y)]$ and $[(x,y+t)]$, we define $A([(x,y)])$ as the unique linear transformation between $T_[(x,y)] mathbb T^2$ and $mathbb R^2$ satisfying



$$A([(x,y)]) left.fracddt [(x+t,y)]right|_t=0 = (1,0) quadtextand,quad A([(x,y)]) left.fracddt [(x,y+t)]right|_t=0 = (0,1). $$



I'm having trouble to solve the following exercise (This exercise can be found on page 6 of the book "The dynamics of vector fields in dimension 3-Etienne Ghys").




Exercise: Suppose $X$ is a non-singular vector field on $mathbbT^2$, and consider $X^∗$
as the map $$ X^*: pi_1left(mathbbT^2, x_0right) to pi_1 left(mathbbR^2 setminus 0, A(x_0)X(x_0) right)$$
$$left[alpha(t)right] mapsto left[A(alpha(t)) X(alpha(t))right] $$
If $X^*$ is a non-trivial homomorphism then $X$
has a periodic orbit.




I was trying to show that if $X$ doesn't admit a periodic orbit, then for every loop $varphi$ we have $A(varphi(t)) X(varphi(t))$ homotopic to a constant curve, but I wasn't able to conclude such thing.



Can anyone help me or can give me some hint?




Update



I noticed that if there exists $alpha_1,alpha_2:mathbbS^1to mathbbT^2$, such that $[alpha_1]$ and $[alpha_2]$ are generators of $pi_1(mathbbT^2,x_0)$ and $ alpha_i'(t),X(alpha_i(t))$ is a basis of $T_alpha_i(t) mathbbT^2$, then $A(alpha_i(t)) X(alpha_i(t))$ is homotopic to $A(alpha_i(t)) alpha'_i (t) $ (the homotopy
$$tildeH(s,t) = A(alpha_i(s))left( (1-t) X(alpha_i(s)) + t alpha_i'(s) right) $$
do the job).



And is relatively easy to demonstrate that $A(alpha_i(t)) alpha'_i (t)$ is homotopic to the constant map. (I realized that this homotopy doesn't work because it doesn't fix the ends of the interval)



Does anyone know if $X$ is a non-singular vector field on $mathbbT^2$ without periodic orbits then there are $alpha_1$ and $alpha_2$ as described above?




I think it's important to inform that in the chapter that this exercise is contained there is the following theorem




Theorem: Every non-singular $mathcalC^2$ vector field on a compact
surface that has no periodic orbits is topologically equivalent to a linear
flow on $mathbbT^2$ with irrational slope




I think that the key to solving the exercise is in the above theorem but I wasn't able to figure out how to do this.









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 15 at 0:59

























asked Jun 21 at 20:29









Matheus Manzatto

1,026520




1,026520











  • My impression is that your own reply in mathoverflow.net/questions/303616/… suffices. No need for more regular conjugacies.
    – John B
    Jun 27 at 20:03










  • @JohnB Sorry, I'm a bit confused. Are you saying that the fact of $X$ is equivalent to the irrational flow on $mathbbT^2$ imply this result?
    – Matheus Manzatto
    Jun 27 at 20:49










  • Sure, the irrational flow in linear in the flat metric.
    – John B
    Jun 27 at 20:53










  • @JohnB ok, if $X$ is a non-vanishing vector field and has no periodic orbits then $X$ equivalent to the irrational flow then $X$ has no periodic orbits. But how this assertion implies that the map $X^*$ is the trivial homomorphism? What I'm trying to say is that isn't obvious to me why this result (about the equivalence of vector fields) solves the exercise. Could you explain me, please?
    – Matheus Manzatto
    Jun 27 at 21:08
















  • My impression is that your own reply in mathoverflow.net/questions/303616/… suffices. No need for more regular conjugacies.
    – John B
    Jun 27 at 20:03










  • @JohnB Sorry, I'm a bit confused. Are you saying that the fact of $X$ is equivalent to the irrational flow on $mathbbT^2$ imply this result?
    – Matheus Manzatto
    Jun 27 at 20:49










  • Sure, the irrational flow in linear in the flat metric.
    – John B
    Jun 27 at 20:53










  • @JohnB ok, if $X$ is a non-vanishing vector field and has no periodic orbits then $X$ equivalent to the irrational flow then $X$ has no periodic orbits. But how this assertion implies that the map $X^*$ is the trivial homomorphism? What I'm trying to say is that isn't obvious to me why this result (about the equivalence of vector fields) solves the exercise. Could you explain me, please?
    – Matheus Manzatto
    Jun 27 at 21:08















My impression is that your own reply in mathoverflow.net/questions/303616/… suffices. No need for more regular conjugacies.
– John B
Jun 27 at 20:03




My impression is that your own reply in mathoverflow.net/questions/303616/… suffices. No need for more regular conjugacies.
– John B
Jun 27 at 20:03












@JohnB Sorry, I'm a bit confused. Are you saying that the fact of $X$ is equivalent to the irrational flow on $mathbbT^2$ imply this result?
– Matheus Manzatto
Jun 27 at 20:49




@JohnB Sorry, I'm a bit confused. Are you saying that the fact of $X$ is equivalent to the irrational flow on $mathbbT^2$ imply this result?
– Matheus Manzatto
Jun 27 at 20:49












Sure, the irrational flow in linear in the flat metric.
– John B
Jun 27 at 20:53




Sure, the irrational flow in linear in the flat metric.
– John B
Jun 27 at 20:53












@JohnB ok, if $X$ is a non-vanishing vector field and has no periodic orbits then $X$ equivalent to the irrational flow then $X$ has no periodic orbits. But how this assertion implies that the map $X^*$ is the trivial homomorphism? What I'm trying to say is that isn't obvious to me why this result (about the equivalence of vector fields) solves the exercise. Could you explain me, please?
– Matheus Manzatto
Jun 27 at 21:08




@JohnB ok, if $X$ is a non-vanishing vector field and has no periodic orbits then $X$ equivalent to the irrational flow then $X$ has no periodic orbits. But how this assertion implies that the map $X^*$ is the trivial homomorphism? What I'm trying to say is that isn't obvious to me why this result (about the equivalence of vector fields) solves the exercise. Could you explain me, please?
– Matheus Manzatto
Jun 27 at 21:08















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2827707%2frelation-between-non-vanishing-vector-fields-on-mathbbt2-and-fundamental-g%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2827707%2frelation-between-non-vanishing-vector-fields-on-mathbbt2-and-fundamental-g%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

1st Magritte Awards