Finding $E(X)$ using moment generating function

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Say:



$m_X(t) = left(frac11-tright)^1/2 cdot left(frac44-tright)^1/2 cdot left(frac99-tright)^1/2 $



We want. $E(X)$.



The only theorem in my textbook is that



$m_X^k(0) = E(X^k)$



As in, the derivative is proportional to the power k to $E(X)$.



Gamma is: $X$ ~ $Gamma(alpha, lambda)$ with mgt $$left(fraclambdalambda-tright)^alpha$$



so $m_X(t) = Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 1) cdot Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 4) cdot Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 9)$.



$E(X) = fracalphalambda$




Solution:



$E(X) = 1/2/1 + 1/2/4 + 1/2/9 = 49/72$



What formula does this use to get above?







share|cite|improve this question




















  • Didn't you already ask exactly this today? To which you received an answer...
    – Did
    Aug 10 at 20:36















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Say:



$m_X(t) = left(frac11-tright)^1/2 cdot left(frac44-tright)^1/2 cdot left(frac99-tright)^1/2 $



We want. $E(X)$.



The only theorem in my textbook is that



$m_X^k(0) = E(X^k)$



As in, the derivative is proportional to the power k to $E(X)$.



Gamma is: $X$ ~ $Gamma(alpha, lambda)$ with mgt $$left(fraclambdalambda-tright)^alpha$$



so $m_X(t) = Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 1) cdot Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 4) cdot Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 9)$.



$E(X) = fracalphalambda$




Solution:



$E(X) = 1/2/1 + 1/2/4 + 1/2/9 = 49/72$



What formula does this use to get above?







share|cite|improve this question




















  • Didn't you already ask exactly this today? To which you received an answer...
    – Did
    Aug 10 at 20:36













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Say:



$m_X(t) = left(frac11-tright)^1/2 cdot left(frac44-tright)^1/2 cdot left(frac99-tright)^1/2 $



We want. $E(X)$.



The only theorem in my textbook is that



$m_X^k(0) = E(X^k)$



As in, the derivative is proportional to the power k to $E(X)$.



Gamma is: $X$ ~ $Gamma(alpha, lambda)$ with mgt $$left(fraclambdalambda-tright)^alpha$$



so $m_X(t) = Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 1) cdot Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 4) cdot Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 9)$.



$E(X) = fracalphalambda$




Solution:



$E(X) = 1/2/1 + 1/2/4 + 1/2/9 = 49/72$



What formula does this use to get above?







share|cite|improve this question












Say:



$m_X(t) = left(frac11-tright)^1/2 cdot left(frac44-tright)^1/2 cdot left(frac99-tright)^1/2 $



We want. $E(X)$.



The only theorem in my textbook is that



$m_X^k(0) = E(X^k)$



As in, the derivative is proportional to the power k to $E(X)$.



Gamma is: $X$ ~ $Gamma(alpha, lambda)$ with mgt $$left(fraclambdalambda-tright)^alpha$$



so $m_X(t) = Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 1) cdot Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 4) cdot Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 9)$.



$E(X) = fracalphalambda$




Solution:



$E(X) = 1/2/1 + 1/2/4 + 1/2/9 = 49/72$



What formula does this use to get above?









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 10 at 19:58









Bas bas

39611




39611











  • Didn't you already ask exactly this today? To which you received an answer...
    – Did
    Aug 10 at 20:36

















  • Didn't you already ask exactly this today? To which you received an answer...
    – Did
    Aug 10 at 20:36
















Didn't you already ask exactly this today? To which you received an answer...
– Did
Aug 10 at 20:36





Didn't you already ask exactly this today? To which you received an answer...
– Did
Aug 10 at 20:36











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













The case $k=1$ gives $E(X)=m_X'(0)$. Since $m_X(0)$, $E(X)$ is also the value at $t=0$ of $$dfracddtln m_X=dfrac-12dfracddt(ln (1-t)+ln (4-t)+ln (9-t))=frac12(dfrac11-t+dfrac14-t+dfrac19-t).$$For $t=0$, this gives $tfrac4972$.






share|cite|improve this answer



























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Hint: Using the theorem, with $k=1$ you get that $m_X'(0) = E(X)$, so find the first derivative of $m_X(t)$ at $0$ to get the answer.






    share|cite|improve this answer




















    • There is a much simpler route.
      – Did
      Aug 10 at 20:37










    • Sure, but the poster appears interested in the approach using the given theorem.
      – B. Mehta
      Aug 10 at 20:58










    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2878757%2ffinding-ex-using-moment-generating-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    The case $k=1$ gives $E(X)=m_X'(0)$. Since $m_X(0)$, $E(X)$ is also the value at $t=0$ of $$dfracddtln m_X=dfrac-12dfracddt(ln (1-t)+ln (4-t)+ln (9-t))=frac12(dfrac11-t+dfrac14-t+dfrac19-t).$$For $t=0$, this gives $tfrac4972$.






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      The case $k=1$ gives $E(X)=m_X'(0)$. Since $m_X(0)$, $E(X)$ is also the value at $t=0$ of $$dfracddtln m_X=dfrac-12dfracddt(ln (1-t)+ln (4-t)+ln (9-t))=frac12(dfrac11-t+dfrac14-t+dfrac19-t).$$For $t=0$, this gives $tfrac4972$.






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        The case $k=1$ gives $E(X)=m_X'(0)$. Since $m_X(0)$, $E(X)$ is also the value at $t=0$ of $$dfracddtln m_X=dfrac-12dfracddt(ln (1-t)+ln (4-t)+ln (9-t))=frac12(dfrac11-t+dfrac14-t+dfrac19-t).$$For $t=0$, this gives $tfrac4972$.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        The case $k=1$ gives $E(X)=m_X'(0)$. Since $m_X(0)$, $E(X)$ is also the value at $t=0$ of $$dfracddtln m_X=dfrac-12dfracddt(ln (1-t)+ln (4-t)+ln (9-t))=frac12(dfrac11-t+dfrac14-t+dfrac19-t).$$For $t=0$, this gives $tfrac4972$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 10 at 21:08









        J.G.

        13.5k11424




        13.5k11424




















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Hint: Using the theorem, with $k=1$ you get that $m_X'(0) = E(X)$, so find the first derivative of $m_X(t)$ at $0$ to get the answer.






            share|cite|improve this answer




















            • There is a much simpler route.
              – Did
              Aug 10 at 20:37










            • Sure, but the poster appears interested in the approach using the given theorem.
              – B. Mehta
              Aug 10 at 20:58














            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Hint: Using the theorem, with $k=1$ you get that $m_X'(0) = E(X)$, so find the first derivative of $m_X(t)$ at $0$ to get the answer.






            share|cite|improve this answer




















            • There is a much simpler route.
              – Did
              Aug 10 at 20:37










            • Sure, but the poster appears interested in the approach using the given theorem.
              – B. Mehta
              Aug 10 at 20:58












            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            Hint: Using the theorem, with $k=1$ you get that $m_X'(0) = E(X)$, so find the first derivative of $m_X(t)$ at $0$ to get the answer.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            Hint: Using the theorem, with $k=1$ you get that $m_X'(0) = E(X)$, so find the first derivative of $m_X(t)$ at $0$ to get the answer.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Aug 10 at 20:22









            B. Mehta

            11.7k21944




            11.7k21944











            • There is a much simpler route.
              – Did
              Aug 10 at 20:37










            • Sure, but the poster appears interested in the approach using the given theorem.
              – B. Mehta
              Aug 10 at 20:58
















            • There is a much simpler route.
              – Did
              Aug 10 at 20:37










            • Sure, but the poster appears interested in the approach using the given theorem.
              – B. Mehta
              Aug 10 at 20:58















            There is a much simpler route.
            – Did
            Aug 10 at 20:37




            There is a much simpler route.
            – Did
            Aug 10 at 20:37












            Sure, but the poster appears interested in the approach using the given theorem.
            – B. Mehta
            Aug 10 at 20:58




            Sure, but the poster appears interested in the approach using the given theorem.
            – B. Mehta
            Aug 10 at 20:58












             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2878757%2ffinding-ex-using-moment-generating-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            Carbon dioxide

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?