Finding $E(X)$ using moment generating function
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Say:
$m_X(t) = left(frac11-tright)^1/2 cdot left(frac44-tright)^1/2 cdot left(frac99-tright)^1/2 $
We want. $E(X)$.
The only theorem in my textbook is that
$m_X^k(0) = E(X^k)$
As in, the derivative is proportional to the power k to $E(X)$.
Gamma is: $X$ ~ $Gamma(alpha, lambda)$ with mgt $$left(fraclambdalambda-tright)^alpha$$
so $m_X(t) = Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 1) cdot Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 4) cdot Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 9)$.
$E(X) = fracalphalambda$
Solution:
$E(X) = 1/2/1 + 1/2/4 + 1/2/9 = 49/72$
What formula does this use to get above?
probability expectation
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Say:
$m_X(t) = left(frac11-tright)^1/2 cdot left(frac44-tright)^1/2 cdot left(frac99-tright)^1/2 $
We want. $E(X)$.
The only theorem in my textbook is that
$m_X^k(0) = E(X^k)$
As in, the derivative is proportional to the power k to $E(X)$.
Gamma is: $X$ ~ $Gamma(alpha, lambda)$ with mgt $$left(fraclambdalambda-tright)^alpha$$
so $m_X(t) = Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 1) cdot Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 4) cdot Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 9)$.
$E(X) = fracalphalambda$
Solution:
$E(X) = 1/2/1 + 1/2/4 + 1/2/9 = 49/72$
What formula does this use to get above?
probability expectation
Didn't you already ask exactly this today? To which you received an answer...
â Did
Aug 10 at 20:36
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Say:
$m_X(t) = left(frac11-tright)^1/2 cdot left(frac44-tright)^1/2 cdot left(frac99-tright)^1/2 $
We want. $E(X)$.
The only theorem in my textbook is that
$m_X^k(0) = E(X^k)$
As in, the derivative is proportional to the power k to $E(X)$.
Gamma is: $X$ ~ $Gamma(alpha, lambda)$ with mgt $$left(fraclambdalambda-tright)^alpha$$
so $m_X(t) = Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 1) cdot Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 4) cdot Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 9)$.
$E(X) = fracalphalambda$
Solution:
$E(X) = 1/2/1 + 1/2/4 + 1/2/9 = 49/72$
What formula does this use to get above?
probability expectation
Say:
$m_X(t) = left(frac11-tright)^1/2 cdot left(frac44-tright)^1/2 cdot left(frac99-tright)^1/2 $
We want. $E(X)$.
The only theorem in my textbook is that
$m_X^k(0) = E(X^k)$
As in, the derivative is proportional to the power k to $E(X)$.
Gamma is: $X$ ~ $Gamma(alpha, lambda)$ with mgt $$left(fraclambdalambda-tright)^alpha$$
so $m_X(t) = Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 1) cdot Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 4) cdot Gamma(alpha=1/2, lambda = 9)$.
$E(X) = fracalphalambda$
Solution:
$E(X) = 1/2/1 + 1/2/4 + 1/2/9 = 49/72$
What formula does this use to get above?
probability expectation
asked Aug 10 at 19:58
Bas bas
39611
39611
Didn't you already ask exactly this today? To which you received an answer...
â Did
Aug 10 at 20:36
add a comment |Â
Didn't you already ask exactly this today? To which you received an answer...
â Did
Aug 10 at 20:36
Didn't you already ask exactly this today? To which you received an answer...
â Did
Aug 10 at 20:36
Didn't you already ask exactly this today? To which you received an answer...
â Did
Aug 10 at 20:36
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
The case $k=1$ gives $E(X)=m_X'(0)$. Since $m_X(0)$, $E(X)$ is also the value at $t=0$ of $$dfracddtln m_X=dfrac-12dfracddt(ln (1-t)+ln (4-t)+ln (9-t))=frac12(dfrac11-t+dfrac14-t+dfrac19-t).$$For $t=0$, this gives $tfrac4972$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Hint: Using the theorem, with $k=1$ you get that $m_X'(0) = E(X)$, so find the first derivative of $m_X(t)$ at $0$ to get the answer.
There is a much simpler route.
â Did
Aug 10 at 20:37
Sure, but the poster appears interested in the approach using the given theorem.
â B. Mehta
Aug 10 at 20:58
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
The case $k=1$ gives $E(X)=m_X'(0)$. Since $m_X(0)$, $E(X)$ is also the value at $t=0$ of $$dfracddtln m_X=dfrac-12dfracddt(ln (1-t)+ln (4-t)+ln (9-t))=frac12(dfrac11-t+dfrac14-t+dfrac19-t).$$For $t=0$, this gives $tfrac4972$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
The case $k=1$ gives $E(X)=m_X'(0)$. Since $m_X(0)$, $E(X)$ is also the value at $t=0$ of $$dfracddtln m_X=dfrac-12dfracddt(ln (1-t)+ln (4-t)+ln (9-t))=frac12(dfrac11-t+dfrac14-t+dfrac19-t).$$For $t=0$, this gives $tfrac4972$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
The case $k=1$ gives $E(X)=m_X'(0)$. Since $m_X(0)$, $E(X)$ is also the value at $t=0$ of $$dfracddtln m_X=dfrac-12dfracddt(ln (1-t)+ln (4-t)+ln (9-t))=frac12(dfrac11-t+dfrac14-t+dfrac19-t).$$For $t=0$, this gives $tfrac4972$.
The case $k=1$ gives $E(X)=m_X'(0)$. Since $m_X(0)$, $E(X)$ is also the value at $t=0$ of $$dfracddtln m_X=dfrac-12dfracddt(ln (1-t)+ln (4-t)+ln (9-t))=frac12(dfrac11-t+dfrac14-t+dfrac19-t).$$For $t=0$, this gives $tfrac4972$.
answered Aug 10 at 21:08
J.G.
13.5k11424
13.5k11424
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Hint: Using the theorem, with $k=1$ you get that $m_X'(0) = E(X)$, so find the first derivative of $m_X(t)$ at $0$ to get the answer.
There is a much simpler route.
â Did
Aug 10 at 20:37
Sure, but the poster appears interested in the approach using the given theorem.
â B. Mehta
Aug 10 at 20:58
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Hint: Using the theorem, with $k=1$ you get that $m_X'(0) = E(X)$, so find the first derivative of $m_X(t)$ at $0$ to get the answer.
There is a much simpler route.
â Did
Aug 10 at 20:37
Sure, but the poster appears interested in the approach using the given theorem.
â B. Mehta
Aug 10 at 20:58
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Hint: Using the theorem, with $k=1$ you get that $m_X'(0) = E(X)$, so find the first derivative of $m_X(t)$ at $0$ to get the answer.
Hint: Using the theorem, with $k=1$ you get that $m_X'(0) = E(X)$, so find the first derivative of $m_X(t)$ at $0$ to get the answer.
answered Aug 10 at 20:22
B. Mehta
11.7k21944
11.7k21944
There is a much simpler route.
â Did
Aug 10 at 20:37
Sure, but the poster appears interested in the approach using the given theorem.
â B. Mehta
Aug 10 at 20:58
add a comment |Â
There is a much simpler route.
â Did
Aug 10 at 20:37
Sure, but the poster appears interested in the approach using the given theorem.
â B. Mehta
Aug 10 at 20:58
There is a much simpler route.
â Did
Aug 10 at 20:37
There is a much simpler route.
â Did
Aug 10 at 20:37
Sure, but the poster appears interested in the approach using the given theorem.
â B. Mehta
Aug 10 at 20:58
Sure, but the poster appears interested in the approach using the given theorem.
â B. Mehta
Aug 10 at 20:58
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2878757%2ffinding-ex-using-moment-generating-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Didn't you already ask exactly this today? To which you received an answer...
â Did
Aug 10 at 20:36