Finding point coordinates that have been reflected.
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm just working on some summer problems so that I can be more prepared when I go into my class in the fall. I found a website full of problems of the content we will be learning but it doesn't have the answers. I need a little guidance on how to do this problem. Here is the problem:
Consider the lines $L1$ and $L2$ with equations:
$L_1 : r = (11, 8, 2) + s(4, 3, -1)$
$L_2 : r = (1, 1,-7) + t(2, 1, 11)$
The lines intersect at point $P$.
The coordinates of $P$ are (3, 2, 4).
The lines are also perpendicular.
The point $Q(7,5,3)$ lies on $L_1$. The point $R$ is the reflection of $Q$ in the line $L_2$.
Question: Find the coordinates of $R$.
So, trying to work this out, Q is on $L_1$. $L_1 : r = (11, 8, 2) + s(4, 3, -1)$. And $R$ is on $L_2$. $L_2 : r = (1, 1,-7) + t(2, 1, 11)$
IâÂÂm guessing I figure out how $Q$ is correlated to $L_1$. And then relate that to $R$. But how would that work?
coordinate-systems reflection
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm just working on some summer problems so that I can be more prepared when I go into my class in the fall. I found a website full of problems of the content we will be learning but it doesn't have the answers. I need a little guidance on how to do this problem. Here is the problem:
Consider the lines $L1$ and $L2$ with equations:
$L_1 : r = (11, 8, 2) + s(4, 3, -1)$
$L_2 : r = (1, 1,-7) + t(2, 1, 11)$
The lines intersect at point $P$.
The coordinates of $P$ are (3, 2, 4).
The lines are also perpendicular.
The point $Q(7,5,3)$ lies on $L_1$. The point $R$ is the reflection of $Q$ in the line $L_2$.
Question: Find the coordinates of $R$.
So, trying to work this out, Q is on $L_1$. $L_1 : r = (11, 8, 2) + s(4, 3, -1)$. And $R$ is on $L_2$. $L_2 : r = (1, 1,-7) + t(2, 1, 11)$
IâÂÂm guessing I figure out how $Q$ is correlated to $L_1$. And then relate that to $R$. But how would that work?
coordinate-systems reflection
If two points A,B(end points of position vectors) are mirror images of each other with regard to a line, the the line bisect the line segment AB.
â Lance
Aug 10 at 20:19
This question was asked before by you math.stackexchange.com/questions/2877680/â¦. You have deletec part c) and asked a new question. I asked for clarification of part c) without answer. Even you include a comment about a part c).
â mfl
Aug 10 at 20:24
@mfl I gave as much information as I was given and I am trying to work out the question to get to the final answer.
â Ella
Aug 10 at 20:26
I think it's reasonable to split out part (c) of the old question into a separate question, especially since you accepted an answer for parts (a) and (b) of the old question. I would also have included a link back to the previous question, since this is a follow-up question. We have that link now via a comment, so it's a moot point now; I merely suggest that in the next situation like this, you include a link in the question.
â David K
Aug 10 at 20:48
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm just working on some summer problems so that I can be more prepared when I go into my class in the fall. I found a website full of problems of the content we will be learning but it doesn't have the answers. I need a little guidance on how to do this problem. Here is the problem:
Consider the lines $L1$ and $L2$ with equations:
$L_1 : r = (11, 8, 2) + s(4, 3, -1)$
$L_2 : r = (1, 1,-7) + t(2, 1, 11)$
The lines intersect at point $P$.
The coordinates of $P$ are (3, 2, 4).
The lines are also perpendicular.
The point $Q(7,5,3)$ lies on $L_1$. The point $R$ is the reflection of $Q$ in the line $L_2$.
Question: Find the coordinates of $R$.
So, trying to work this out, Q is on $L_1$. $L_1 : r = (11, 8, 2) + s(4, 3, -1)$. And $R$ is on $L_2$. $L_2 : r = (1, 1,-7) + t(2, 1, 11)$
IâÂÂm guessing I figure out how $Q$ is correlated to $L_1$. And then relate that to $R$. But how would that work?
coordinate-systems reflection
I'm just working on some summer problems so that I can be more prepared when I go into my class in the fall. I found a website full of problems of the content we will be learning but it doesn't have the answers. I need a little guidance on how to do this problem. Here is the problem:
Consider the lines $L1$ and $L2$ with equations:
$L_1 : r = (11, 8, 2) + s(4, 3, -1)$
$L_2 : r = (1, 1,-7) + t(2, 1, 11)$
The lines intersect at point $P$.
The coordinates of $P$ are (3, 2, 4).
The lines are also perpendicular.
The point $Q(7,5,3)$ lies on $L_1$. The point $R$ is the reflection of $Q$ in the line $L_2$.
Question: Find the coordinates of $R$.
So, trying to work this out, Q is on $L_1$. $L_1 : r = (11, 8, 2) + s(4, 3, -1)$. And $R$ is on $L_2$. $L_2 : r = (1, 1,-7) + t(2, 1, 11)$
IâÂÂm guessing I figure out how $Q$ is correlated to $L_1$. And then relate that to $R$. But how would that work?
coordinate-systems reflection
edited Aug 10 at 21:15
asked Aug 10 at 20:10
Ella
1189
1189
If two points A,B(end points of position vectors) are mirror images of each other with regard to a line, the the line bisect the line segment AB.
â Lance
Aug 10 at 20:19
This question was asked before by you math.stackexchange.com/questions/2877680/â¦. You have deletec part c) and asked a new question. I asked for clarification of part c) without answer. Even you include a comment about a part c).
â mfl
Aug 10 at 20:24
@mfl I gave as much information as I was given and I am trying to work out the question to get to the final answer.
â Ella
Aug 10 at 20:26
I think it's reasonable to split out part (c) of the old question into a separate question, especially since you accepted an answer for parts (a) and (b) of the old question. I would also have included a link back to the previous question, since this is a follow-up question. We have that link now via a comment, so it's a moot point now; I merely suggest that in the next situation like this, you include a link in the question.
â David K
Aug 10 at 20:48
add a comment |Â
If two points A,B(end points of position vectors) are mirror images of each other with regard to a line, the the line bisect the line segment AB.
â Lance
Aug 10 at 20:19
This question was asked before by you math.stackexchange.com/questions/2877680/â¦. You have deletec part c) and asked a new question. I asked for clarification of part c) without answer. Even you include a comment about a part c).
â mfl
Aug 10 at 20:24
@mfl I gave as much information as I was given and I am trying to work out the question to get to the final answer.
â Ella
Aug 10 at 20:26
I think it's reasonable to split out part (c) of the old question into a separate question, especially since you accepted an answer for parts (a) and (b) of the old question. I would also have included a link back to the previous question, since this is a follow-up question. We have that link now via a comment, so it's a moot point now; I merely suggest that in the next situation like this, you include a link in the question.
â David K
Aug 10 at 20:48
If two points A,B(end points of position vectors) are mirror images of each other with regard to a line, the the line bisect the line segment AB.
â Lance
Aug 10 at 20:19
If two points A,B(end points of position vectors) are mirror images of each other with regard to a line, the the line bisect the line segment AB.
â Lance
Aug 10 at 20:19
This question was asked before by you math.stackexchange.com/questions/2877680/â¦. You have deletec part c) and asked a new question. I asked for clarification of part c) without answer. Even you include a comment about a part c).
â mfl
Aug 10 at 20:24
This question was asked before by you math.stackexchange.com/questions/2877680/â¦. You have deletec part c) and asked a new question. I asked for clarification of part c) without answer. Even you include a comment about a part c).
â mfl
Aug 10 at 20:24
@mfl I gave as much information as I was given and I am trying to work out the question to get to the final answer.
â Ella
Aug 10 at 20:26
@mfl I gave as much information as I was given and I am trying to work out the question to get to the final answer.
â Ella
Aug 10 at 20:26
I think it's reasonable to split out part (c) of the old question into a separate question, especially since you accepted an answer for parts (a) and (b) of the old question. I would also have included a link back to the previous question, since this is a follow-up question. We have that link now via a comment, so it's a moot point now; I merely suggest that in the next situation like this, you include a link in the question.
â David K
Aug 10 at 20:48
I think it's reasonable to split out part (c) of the old question into a separate question, especially since you accepted an answer for parts (a) and (b) of the old question. I would also have included a link back to the previous question, since this is a follow-up question. We have that link now via a comment, so it's a moot point now; I merely suggest that in the next situation like this, you include a link in the question.
â David K
Aug 10 at 20:48
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
The reflection of a point $Q$ in a line $L$ can be described as follows:
Drop a perpendicular from $Q$ to the line $L.$
Suppose we say $M$ is the name of the point at the foot of the perpendicular.
That is, $M$ is on $L$ and the segment $QM$ is perpendicular to $L.$
The reflection of $Q$ in the line $L$ is the point (call it $Q'$) that is the same distance from $M$ as $Q$ is, but in the exact opposite direction.
That way, the segment $QQ'$ is perpendicular to $L,$ and $L$ cuts through $QQ'$ at $M,$ exactly midway between $Q$ and $Q'$.
One way to look at this is, if you have $M,$ you can take the vector from $M$ to $Q,$
and then reverse the direction of the vector to get a vector from $M$ to $Q'.$
Now, knowing $M$ and the vector from $M$ to $Q',$ you find $Q'.$
Now review the information in the question statement.
You have the coordinates of $Q.$ You also have the coordinates of $M$ (not called by that name, but if you look at the facts already given in the question, you should find the coordinates there).
So you can find the vector $MQ,$ reverse it, and find $Q'.$
Alternatively, instead of using vectors, use the fact that $M$ is the midpoint of $Q$ and $Q'.$ Therefore
$$ x_M = fracx_Q + x_Q'2, quad
y_M = fracy_Q + y_Q'2, quad textandquad
z_M = fracz_Q + z_Q'2.$$
Put the coordinates of $Q$ and $M$ in these equations, then solve for $x_Q',$ $y_Q',$
and $z_Q'.$
Point $Q$ has $x, y, and z$. So wouldnâÂÂt $R$ also have those 3 parts?
â Ella
Aug 10 at 21:17
1
Right, $z$ is dealt with similarly to $x$ and $y.$ I have added that detail to the answer.
â David K
Aug 10 at 21:35
I got (-1,-1, 5) as my answer. Does this seem correct?
â Ella
Aug 10 at 23:34
1
Yes, I get the same.
â David K
Aug 10 at 23:51
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
The reflection of a point $Q$ in a line $L$ can be described as follows:
Drop a perpendicular from $Q$ to the line $L.$
Suppose we say $M$ is the name of the point at the foot of the perpendicular.
That is, $M$ is on $L$ and the segment $QM$ is perpendicular to $L.$
The reflection of $Q$ in the line $L$ is the point (call it $Q'$) that is the same distance from $M$ as $Q$ is, but in the exact opposite direction.
That way, the segment $QQ'$ is perpendicular to $L,$ and $L$ cuts through $QQ'$ at $M,$ exactly midway between $Q$ and $Q'$.
One way to look at this is, if you have $M,$ you can take the vector from $M$ to $Q,$
and then reverse the direction of the vector to get a vector from $M$ to $Q'.$
Now, knowing $M$ and the vector from $M$ to $Q',$ you find $Q'.$
Now review the information in the question statement.
You have the coordinates of $Q.$ You also have the coordinates of $M$ (not called by that name, but if you look at the facts already given in the question, you should find the coordinates there).
So you can find the vector $MQ,$ reverse it, and find $Q'.$
Alternatively, instead of using vectors, use the fact that $M$ is the midpoint of $Q$ and $Q'.$ Therefore
$$ x_M = fracx_Q + x_Q'2, quad
y_M = fracy_Q + y_Q'2, quad textandquad
z_M = fracz_Q + z_Q'2.$$
Put the coordinates of $Q$ and $M$ in these equations, then solve for $x_Q',$ $y_Q',$
and $z_Q'.$
Point $Q$ has $x, y, and z$. So wouldnâÂÂt $R$ also have those 3 parts?
â Ella
Aug 10 at 21:17
1
Right, $z$ is dealt with similarly to $x$ and $y.$ I have added that detail to the answer.
â David K
Aug 10 at 21:35
I got (-1,-1, 5) as my answer. Does this seem correct?
â Ella
Aug 10 at 23:34
1
Yes, I get the same.
â David K
Aug 10 at 23:51
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
The reflection of a point $Q$ in a line $L$ can be described as follows:
Drop a perpendicular from $Q$ to the line $L.$
Suppose we say $M$ is the name of the point at the foot of the perpendicular.
That is, $M$ is on $L$ and the segment $QM$ is perpendicular to $L.$
The reflection of $Q$ in the line $L$ is the point (call it $Q'$) that is the same distance from $M$ as $Q$ is, but in the exact opposite direction.
That way, the segment $QQ'$ is perpendicular to $L,$ and $L$ cuts through $QQ'$ at $M,$ exactly midway between $Q$ and $Q'$.
One way to look at this is, if you have $M,$ you can take the vector from $M$ to $Q,$
and then reverse the direction of the vector to get a vector from $M$ to $Q'.$
Now, knowing $M$ and the vector from $M$ to $Q',$ you find $Q'.$
Now review the information in the question statement.
You have the coordinates of $Q.$ You also have the coordinates of $M$ (not called by that name, but if you look at the facts already given in the question, you should find the coordinates there).
So you can find the vector $MQ,$ reverse it, and find $Q'.$
Alternatively, instead of using vectors, use the fact that $M$ is the midpoint of $Q$ and $Q'.$ Therefore
$$ x_M = fracx_Q + x_Q'2, quad
y_M = fracy_Q + y_Q'2, quad textandquad
z_M = fracz_Q + z_Q'2.$$
Put the coordinates of $Q$ and $M$ in these equations, then solve for $x_Q',$ $y_Q',$
and $z_Q'.$
Point $Q$ has $x, y, and z$. So wouldnâÂÂt $R$ also have those 3 parts?
â Ella
Aug 10 at 21:17
1
Right, $z$ is dealt with similarly to $x$ and $y.$ I have added that detail to the answer.
â David K
Aug 10 at 21:35
I got (-1,-1, 5) as my answer. Does this seem correct?
â Ella
Aug 10 at 23:34
1
Yes, I get the same.
â David K
Aug 10 at 23:51
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
The reflection of a point $Q$ in a line $L$ can be described as follows:
Drop a perpendicular from $Q$ to the line $L.$
Suppose we say $M$ is the name of the point at the foot of the perpendicular.
That is, $M$ is on $L$ and the segment $QM$ is perpendicular to $L.$
The reflection of $Q$ in the line $L$ is the point (call it $Q'$) that is the same distance from $M$ as $Q$ is, but in the exact opposite direction.
That way, the segment $QQ'$ is perpendicular to $L,$ and $L$ cuts through $QQ'$ at $M,$ exactly midway between $Q$ and $Q'$.
One way to look at this is, if you have $M,$ you can take the vector from $M$ to $Q,$
and then reverse the direction of the vector to get a vector from $M$ to $Q'.$
Now, knowing $M$ and the vector from $M$ to $Q',$ you find $Q'.$
Now review the information in the question statement.
You have the coordinates of $Q.$ You also have the coordinates of $M$ (not called by that name, but if you look at the facts already given in the question, you should find the coordinates there).
So you can find the vector $MQ,$ reverse it, and find $Q'.$
Alternatively, instead of using vectors, use the fact that $M$ is the midpoint of $Q$ and $Q'.$ Therefore
$$ x_M = fracx_Q + x_Q'2, quad
y_M = fracy_Q + y_Q'2, quad textandquad
z_M = fracz_Q + z_Q'2.$$
Put the coordinates of $Q$ and $M$ in these equations, then solve for $x_Q',$ $y_Q',$
and $z_Q'.$
The reflection of a point $Q$ in a line $L$ can be described as follows:
Drop a perpendicular from $Q$ to the line $L.$
Suppose we say $M$ is the name of the point at the foot of the perpendicular.
That is, $M$ is on $L$ and the segment $QM$ is perpendicular to $L.$
The reflection of $Q$ in the line $L$ is the point (call it $Q'$) that is the same distance from $M$ as $Q$ is, but in the exact opposite direction.
That way, the segment $QQ'$ is perpendicular to $L,$ and $L$ cuts through $QQ'$ at $M,$ exactly midway between $Q$ and $Q'$.
One way to look at this is, if you have $M,$ you can take the vector from $M$ to $Q,$
and then reverse the direction of the vector to get a vector from $M$ to $Q'.$
Now, knowing $M$ and the vector from $M$ to $Q',$ you find $Q'.$
Now review the information in the question statement.
You have the coordinates of $Q.$ You also have the coordinates of $M$ (not called by that name, but if you look at the facts already given in the question, you should find the coordinates there).
So you can find the vector $MQ,$ reverse it, and find $Q'.$
Alternatively, instead of using vectors, use the fact that $M$ is the midpoint of $Q$ and $Q'.$ Therefore
$$ x_M = fracx_Q + x_Q'2, quad
y_M = fracy_Q + y_Q'2, quad textandquad
z_M = fracz_Q + z_Q'2.$$
Put the coordinates of $Q$ and $M$ in these equations, then solve for $x_Q',$ $y_Q',$
and $z_Q'.$
edited Aug 10 at 21:34
answered Aug 10 at 21:00
David K
48.5k340108
48.5k340108
Point $Q$ has $x, y, and z$. So wouldnâÂÂt $R$ also have those 3 parts?
â Ella
Aug 10 at 21:17
1
Right, $z$ is dealt with similarly to $x$ and $y.$ I have added that detail to the answer.
â David K
Aug 10 at 21:35
I got (-1,-1, 5) as my answer. Does this seem correct?
â Ella
Aug 10 at 23:34
1
Yes, I get the same.
â David K
Aug 10 at 23:51
add a comment |Â
Point $Q$ has $x, y, and z$. So wouldnâÂÂt $R$ also have those 3 parts?
â Ella
Aug 10 at 21:17
1
Right, $z$ is dealt with similarly to $x$ and $y.$ I have added that detail to the answer.
â David K
Aug 10 at 21:35
I got (-1,-1, 5) as my answer. Does this seem correct?
â Ella
Aug 10 at 23:34
1
Yes, I get the same.
â David K
Aug 10 at 23:51
Point $Q$ has $x, y, and z$. So wouldnâÂÂt $R$ also have those 3 parts?
â Ella
Aug 10 at 21:17
Point $Q$ has $x, y, and z$. So wouldnâÂÂt $R$ also have those 3 parts?
â Ella
Aug 10 at 21:17
1
1
Right, $z$ is dealt with similarly to $x$ and $y.$ I have added that detail to the answer.
â David K
Aug 10 at 21:35
Right, $z$ is dealt with similarly to $x$ and $y.$ I have added that detail to the answer.
â David K
Aug 10 at 21:35
I got (-1,-1, 5) as my answer. Does this seem correct?
â Ella
Aug 10 at 23:34
I got (-1,-1, 5) as my answer. Does this seem correct?
â Ella
Aug 10 at 23:34
1
1
Yes, I get the same.
â David K
Aug 10 at 23:51
Yes, I get the same.
â David K
Aug 10 at 23:51
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2878772%2ffinding-point-coordinates-that-have-been-reflected%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
If two points A,B(end points of position vectors) are mirror images of each other with regard to a line, the the line bisect the line segment AB.
â Lance
Aug 10 at 20:19
This question was asked before by you math.stackexchange.com/questions/2877680/â¦. You have deletec part c) and asked a new question. I asked for clarification of part c) without answer. Even you include a comment about a part c).
â mfl
Aug 10 at 20:24
@mfl I gave as much information as I was given and I am trying to work out the question to get to the final answer.
â Ella
Aug 10 at 20:26
I think it's reasonable to split out part (c) of the old question into a separate question, especially since you accepted an answer for parts (a) and (b) of the old question. I would also have included a link back to the previous question, since this is a follow-up question. We have that link now via a comment, so it's a moot point now; I merely suggest that in the next situation like this, you include a link in the question.
â David K
Aug 10 at 20:48