Finding point coordinates that have been reflected.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm just working on some summer problems so that I can be more prepared when I go into my class in the fall. I found a website full of problems of the content we will be learning but it doesn't have the answers. I need a little guidance on how to do this problem. Here is the problem:



Consider the lines $L1$ and $L2$ with equations:



$L_1 : r = (11, 8, 2) + s(4, 3, -1)$

$L_2 : r = (1, 1,-7) + t(2, 1, 11)$

The lines intersect at point $P$.



The coordinates of $P$ are (3, 2, 4).
The lines are also perpendicular.



The point $Q(7,5,3)$ lies on $L_1$. The point $R$ is the reflection of $Q$ in the line $L_2$.



Question: Find the coordinates of $R$.



So, trying to work this out, Q is on $L_1$. $L_1 : r = (11, 8, 2) + s(4, 3, -1)$. And $R$ is on $L_2$. $L_2 : r = (1, 1,-7) + t(2, 1, 11)$



I’m guessing I figure out how $Q$ is correlated to $L_1$. And then relate that to $R$. But how would that work?







share|cite|improve this question






















  • If two points A,B(end points of position vectors) are mirror images of each other with regard to a line, the the line bisect the line segment AB.
    – Lance
    Aug 10 at 20:19










  • This question was asked before by you math.stackexchange.com/questions/2877680/…. You have deletec part c) and asked a new question. I asked for clarification of part c) without answer. Even you include a comment about a part c).
    – mfl
    Aug 10 at 20:24











  • @mfl I gave as much information as I was given and I am trying to work out the question to get to the final answer.
    – Ella
    Aug 10 at 20:26










  • I think it's reasonable to split out part (c) of the old question into a separate question, especially since you accepted an answer for parts (a) and (b) of the old question. I would also have included a link back to the previous question, since this is a follow-up question. We have that link now via a comment, so it's a moot point now; I merely suggest that in the next situation like this, you include a link in the question.
    – David K
    Aug 10 at 20:48














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm just working on some summer problems so that I can be more prepared when I go into my class in the fall. I found a website full of problems of the content we will be learning but it doesn't have the answers. I need a little guidance on how to do this problem. Here is the problem:



Consider the lines $L1$ and $L2$ with equations:



$L_1 : r = (11, 8, 2) + s(4, 3, -1)$

$L_2 : r = (1, 1,-7) + t(2, 1, 11)$

The lines intersect at point $P$.



The coordinates of $P$ are (3, 2, 4).
The lines are also perpendicular.



The point $Q(7,5,3)$ lies on $L_1$. The point $R$ is the reflection of $Q$ in the line $L_2$.



Question: Find the coordinates of $R$.



So, trying to work this out, Q is on $L_1$. $L_1 : r = (11, 8, 2) + s(4, 3, -1)$. And $R$ is on $L_2$. $L_2 : r = (1, 1,-7) + t(2, 1, 11)$



I’m guessing I figure out how $Q$ is correlated to $L_1$. And then relate that to $R$. But how would that work?







share|cite|improve this question






















  • If two points A,B(end points of position vectors) are mirror images of each other with regard to a line, the the line bisect the line segment AB.
    – Lance
    Aug 10 at 20:19










  • This question was asked before by you math.stackexchange.com/questions/2877680/…. You have deletec part c) and asked a new question. I asked for clarification of part c) without answer. Even you include a comment about a part c).
    – mfl
    Aug 10 at 20:24











  • @mfl I gave as much information as I was given and I am trying to work out the question to get to the final answer.
    – Ella
    Aug 10 at 20:26










  • I think it's reasonable to split out part (c) of the old question into a separate question, especially since you accepted an answer for parts (a) and (b) of the old question. I would also have included a link back to the previous question, since this is a follow-up question. We have that link now via a comment, so it's a moot point now; I merely suggest that in the next situation like this, you include a link in the question.
    – David K
    Aug 10 at 20:48












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I'm just working on some summer problems so that I can be more prepared when I go into my class in the fall. I found a website full of problems of the content we will be learning but it doesn't have the answers. I need a little guidance on how to do this problem. Here is the problem:



Consider the lines $L1$ and $L2$ with equations:



$L_1 : r = (11, 8, 2) + s(4, 3, -1)$

$L_2 : r = (1, 1,-7) + t(2, 1, 11)$

The lines intersect at point $P$.



The coordinates of $P$ are (3, 2, 4).
The lines are also perpendicular.



The point $Q(7,5,3)$ lies on $L_1$. The point $R$ is the reflection of $Q$ in the line $L_2$.



Question: Find the coordinates of $R$.



So, trying to work this out, Q is on $L_1$. $L_1 : r = (11, 8, 2) + s(4, 3, -1)$. And $R$ is on $L_2$. $L_2 : r = (1, 1,-7) + t(2, 1, 11)$



I’m guessing I figure out how $Q$ is correlated to $L_1$. And then relate that to $R$. But how would that work?







share|cite|improve this question














I'm just working on some summer problems so that I can be more prepared when I go into my class in the fall. I found a website full of problems of the content we will be learning but it doesn't have the answers. I need a little guidance on how to do this problem. Here is the problem:



Consider the lines $L1$ and $L2$ with equations:



$L_1 : r = (11, 8, 2) + s(4, 3, -1)$

$L_2 : r = (1, 1,-7) + t(2, 1, 11)$

The lines intersect at point $P$.



The coordinates of $P$ are (3, 2, 4).
The lines are also perpendicular.



The point $Q(7,5,3)$ lies on $L_1$. The point $R$ is the reflection of $Q$ in the line $L_2$.



Question: Find the coordinates of $R$.



So, trying to work this out, Q is on $L_1$. $L_1 : r = (11, 8, 2) + s(4, 3, -1)$. And $R$ is on $L_2$. $L_2 : r = (1, 1,-7) + t(2, 1, 11)$



I’m guessing I figure out how $Q$ is correlated to $L_1$. And then relate that to $R$. But how would that work?









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 10 at 21:15

























asked Aug 10 at 20:10









Ella

1189




1189











  • If two points A,B(end points of position vectors) are mirror images of each other with regard to a line, the the line bisect the line segment AB.
    – Lance
    Aug 10 at 20:19










  • This question was asked before by you math.stackexchange.com/questions/2877680/…. You have deletec part c) and asked a new question. I asked for clarification of part c) without answer. Even you include a comment about a part c).
    – mfl
    Aug 10 at 20:24











  • @mfl I gave as much information as I was given and I am trying to work out the question to get to the final answer.
    – Ella
    Aug 10 at 20:26










  • I think it's reasonable to split out part (c) of the old question into a separate question, especially since you accepted an answer for parts (a) and (b) of the old question. I would also have included a link back to the previous question, since this is a follow-up question. We have that link now via a comment, so it's a moot point now; I merely suggest that in the next situation like this, you include a link in the question.
    – David K
    Aug 10 at 20:48
















  • If two points A,B(end points of position vectors) are mirror images of each other with regard to a line, the the line bisect the line segment AB.
    – Lance
    Aug 10 at 20:19










  • This question was asked before by you math.stackexchange.com/questions/2877680/…. You have deletec part c) and asked a new question. I asked for clarification of part c) without answer. Even you include a comment about a part c).
    – mfl
    Aug 10 at 20:24











  • @mfl I gave as much information as I was given and I am trying to work out the question to get to the final answer.
    – Ella
    Aug 10 at 20:26










  • I think it's reasonable to split out part (c) of the old question into a separate question, especially since you accepted an answer for parts (a) and (b) of the old question. I would also have included a link back to the previous question, since this is a follow-up question. We have that link now via a comment, so it's a moot point now; I merely suggest that in the next situation like this, you include a link in the question.
    – David K
    Aug 10 at 20:48















If two points A,B(end points of position vectors) are mirror images of each other with regard to a line, the the line bisect the line segment AB.
– Lance
Aug 10 at 20:19




If two points A,B(end points of position vectors) are mirror images of each other with regard to a line, the the line bisect the line segment AB.
– Lance
Aug 10 at 20:19












This question was asked before by you math.stackexchange.com/questions/2877680/…. You have deletec part c) and asked a new question. I asked for clarification of part c) without answer. Even you include a comment about a part c).
– mfl
Aug 10 at 20:24





This question was asked before by you math.stackexchange.com/questions/2877680/…. You have deletec part c) and asked a new question. I asked for clarification of part c) without answer. Even you include a comment about a part c).
– mfl
Aug 10 at 20:24













@mfl I gave as much information as I was given and I am trying to work out the question to get to the final answer.
– Ella
Aug 10 at 20:26




@mfl I gave as much information as I was given and I am trying to work out the question to get to the final answer.
– Ella
Aug 10 at 20:26












I think it's reasonable to split out part (c) of the old question into a separate question, especially since you accepted an answer for parts (a) and (b) of the old question. I would also have included a link back to the previous question, since this is a follow-up question. We have that link now via a comment, so it's a moot point now; I merely suggest that in the next situation like this, you include a link in the question.
– David K
Aug 10 at 20:48




I think it's reasonable to split out part (c) of the old question into a separate question, especially since you accepted an answer for parts (a) and (b) of the old question. I would also have included a link back to the previous question, since this is a follow-up question. We have that link now via a comment, so it's a moot point now; I merely suggest that in the next situation like this, you include a link in the question.
– David K
Aug 10 at 20:48










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










The reflection of a point $Q$ in a line $L$ can be described as follows:



Drop a perpendicular from $Q$ to the line $L.$
Suppose we say $M$ is the name of the point at the foot of the perpendicular.
That is, $M$ is on $L$ and the segment $QM$ is perpendicular to $L.$



The reflection of $Q$ in the line $L$ is the point (call it $Q'$) that is the same distance from $M$ as $Q$ is, but in the exact opposite direction.
That way, the segment $QQ'$ is perpendicular to $L,$ and $L$ cuts through $QQ'$ at $M,$ exactly midway between $Q$ and $Q'$.



One way to look at this is, if you have $M,$ you can take the vector from $M$ to $Q,$
and then reverse the direction of the vector to get a vector from $M$ to $Q'.$
Now, knowing $M$ and the vector from $M$ to $Q',$ you find $Q'.$



Now review the information in the question statement.
You have the coordinates of $Q.$ You also have the coordinates of $M$ (not called by that name, but if you look at the facts already given in the question, you should find the coordinates there).
So you can find the vector $MQ,$ reverse it, and find $Q'.$



Alternatively, instead of using vectors, use the fact that $M$ is the midpoint of $Q$ and $Q'.$ Therefore
$$ x_M = fracx_Q + x_Q'2, quad
y_M = fracy_Q + y_Q'2, quad textandquad
z_M = fracz_Q + z_Q'2.$$
Put the coordinates of $Q$ and $M$ in these equations, then solve for $x_Q',$ $y_Q',$
and $z_Q'.$






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • Point $Q$ has $x, y, and z$. So wouldn’t $R$ also have those 3 parts?
    – Ella
    Aug 10 at 21:17






  • 1




    Right, $z$ is dealt with similarly to $x$ and $y.$ I have added that detail to the answer.
    – David K
    Aug 10 at 21:35










  • I got (-1,-1, 5) as my answer. Does this seem correct?
    – Ella
    Aug 10 at 23:34






  • 1




    Yes, I get the same.
    – David K
    Aug 10 at 23:51










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2878772%2ffinding-point-coordinates-that-have-been-reflected%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










The reflection of a point $Q$ in a line $L$ can be described as follows:



Drop a perpendicular from $Q$ to the line $L.$
Suppose we say $M$ is the name of the point at the foot of the perpendicular.
That is, $M$ is on $L$ and the segment $QM$ is perpendicular to $L.$



The reflection of $Q$ in the line $L$ is the point (call it $Q'$) that is the same distance from $M$ as $Q$ is, but in the exact opposite direction.
That way, the segment $QQ'$ is perpendicular to $L,$ and $L$ cuts through $QQ'$ at $M,$ exactly midway between $Q$ and $Q'$.



One way to look at this is, if you have $M,$ you can take the vector from $M$ to $Q,$
and then reverse the direction of the vector to get a vector from $M$ to $Q'.$
Now, knowing $M$ and the vector from $M$ to $Q',$ you find $Q'.$



Now review the information in the question statement.
You have the coordinates of $Q.$ You also have the coordinates of $M$ (not called by that name, but if you look at the facts already given in the question, you should find the coordinates there).
So you can find the vector $MQ,$ reverse it, and find $Q'.$



Alternatively, instead of using vectors, use the fact that $M$ is the midpoint of $Q$ and $Q'.$ Therefore
$$ x_M = fracx_Q + x_Q'2, quad
y_M = fracy_Q + y_Q'2, quad textandquad
z_M = fracz_Q + z_Q'2.$$
Put the coordinates of $Q$ and $M$ in these equations, then solve for $x_Q',$ $y_Q',$
and $z_Q'.$






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • Point $Q$ has $x, y, and z$. So wouldn’t $R$ also have those 3 parts?
    – Ella
    Aug 10 at 21:17






  • 1




    Right, $z$ is dealt with similarly to $x$ and $y.$ I have added that detail to the answer.
    – David K
    Aug 10 at 21:35










  • I got (-1,-1, 5) as my answer. Does this seem correct?
    – Ella
    Aug 10 at 23:34






  • 1




    Yes, I get the same.
    – David K
    Aug 10 at 23:51














up vote
1
down vote



accepted










The reflection of a point $Q$ in a line $L$ can be described as follows:



Drop a perpendicular from $Q$ to the line $L.$
Suppose we say $M$ is the name of the point at the foot of the perpendicular.
That is, $M$ is on $L$ and the segment $QM$ is perpendicular to $L.$



The reflection of $Q$ in the line $L$ is the point (call it $Q'$) that is the same distance from $M$ as $Q$ is, but in the exact opposite direction.
That way, the segment $QQ'$ is perpendicular to $L,$ and $L$ cuts through $QQ'$ at $M,$ exactly midway between $Q$ and $Q'$.



One way to look at this is, if you have $M,$ you can take the vector from $M$ to $Q,$
and then reverse the direction of the vector to get a vector from $M$ to $Q'.$
Now, knowing $M$ and the vector from $M$ to $Q',$ you find $Q'.$



Now review the information in the question statement.
You have the coordinates of $Q.$ You also have the coordinates of $M$ (not called by that name, but if you look at the facts already given in the question, you should find the coordinates there).
So you can find the vector $MQ,$ reverse it, and find $Q'.$



Alternatively, instead of using vectors, use the fact that $M$ is the midpoint of $Q$ and $Q'.$ Therefore
$$ x_M = fracx_Q + x_Q'2, quad
y_M = fracy_Q + y_Q'2, quad textandquad
z_M = fracz_Q + z_Q'2.$$
Put the coordinates of $Q$ and $M$ in these equations, then solve for $x_Q',$ $y_Q',$
and $z_Q'.$






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • Point $Q$ has $x, y, and z$. So wouldn’t $R$ also have those 3 parts?
    – Ella
    Aug 10 at 21:17






  • 1




    Right, $z$ is dealt with similarly to $x$ and $y.$ I have added that detail to the answer.
    – David K
    Aug 10 at 21:35










  • I got (-1,-1, 5) as my answer. Does this seem correct?
    – Ella
    Aug 10 at 23:34






  • 1




    Yes, I get the same.
    – David K
    Aug 10 at 23:51












up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






The reflection of a point $Q$ in a line $L$ can be described as follows:



Drop a perpendicular from $Q$ to the line $L.$
Suppose we say $M$ is the name of the point at the foot of the perpendicular.
That is, $M$ is on $L$ and the segment $QM$ is perpendicular to $L.$



The reflection of $Q$ in the line $L$ is the point (call it $Q'$) that is the same distance from $M$ as $Q$ is, but in the exact opposite direction.
That way, the segment $QQ'$ is perpendicular to $L,$ and $L$ cuts through $QQ'$ at $M,$ exactly midway between $Q$ and $Q'$.



One way to look at this is, if you have $M,$ you can take the vector from $M$ to $Q,$
and then reverse the direction of the vector to get a vector from $M$ to $Q'.$
Now, knowing $M$ and the vector from $M$ to $Q',$ you find $Q'.$



Now review the information in the question statement.
You have the coordinates of $Q.$ You also have the coordinates of $M$ (not called by that name, but if you look at the facts already given in the question, you should find the coordinates there).
So you can find the vector $MQ,$ reverse it, and find $Q'.$



Alternatively, instead of using vectors, use the fact that $M$ is the midpoint of $Q$ and $Q'.$ Therefore
$$ x_M = fracx_Q + x_Q'2, quad
y_M = fracy_Q + y_Q'2, quad textandquad
z_M = fracz_Q + z_Q'2.$$
Put the coordinates of $Q$ and $M$ in these equations, then solve for $x_Q',$ $y_Q',$
and $z_Q'.$






share|cite|improve this answer














The reflection of a point $Q$ in a line $L$ can be described as follows:



Drop a perpendicular from $Q$ to the line $L.$
Suppose we say $M$ is the name of the point at the foot of the perpendicular.
That is, $M$ is on $L$ and the segment $QM$ is perpendicular to $L.$



The reflection of $Q$ in the line $L$ is the point (call it $Q'$) that is the same distance from $M$ as $Q$ is, but in the exact opposite direction.
That way, the segment $QQ'$ is perpendicular to $L,$ and $L$ cuts through $QQ'$ at $M,$ exactly midway between $Q$ and $Q'$.



One way to look at this is, if you have $M,$ you can take the vector from $M$ to $Q,$
and then reverse the direction of the vector to get a vector from $M$ to $Q'.$
Now, knowing $M$ and the vector from $M$ to $Q',$ you find $Q'.$



Now review the information in the question statement.
You have the coordinates of $Q.$ You also have the coordinates of $M$ (not called by that name, but if you look at the facts already given in the question, you should find the coordinates there).
So you can find the vector $MQ,$ reverse it, and find $Q'.$



Alternatively, instead of using vectors, use the fact that $M$ is the midpoint of $Q$ and $Q'.$ Therefore
$$ x_M = fracx_Q + x_Q'2, quad
y_M = fracy_Q + y_Q'2, quad textandquad
z_M = fracz_Q + z_Q'2.$$
Put the coordinates of $Q$ and $M$ in these equations, then solve for $x_Q',$ $y_Q',$
and $z_Q'.$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Aug 10 at 21:34

























answered Aug 10 at 21:00









David K

48.5k340108




48.5k340108











  • Point $Q$ has $x, y, and z$. So wouldn’t $R$ also have those 3 parts?
    – Ella
    Aug 10 at 21:17






  • 1




    Right, $z$ is dealt with similarly to $x$ and $y.$ I have added that detail to the answer.
    – David K
    Aug 10 at 21:35










  • I got (-1,-1, 5) as my answer. Does this seem correct?
    – Ella
    Aug 10 at 23:34






  • 1




    Yes, I get the same.
    – David K
    Aug 10 at 23:51
















  • Point $Q$ has $x, y, and z$. So wouldn’t $R$ also have those 3 parts?
    – Ella
    Aug 10 at 21:17






  • 1




    Right, $z$ is dealt with similarly to $x$ and $y.$ I have added that detail to the answer.
    – David K
    Aug 10 at 21:35










  • I got (-1,-1, 5) as my answer. Does this seem correct?
    – Ella
    Aug 10 at 23:34






  • 1




    Yes, I get the same.
    – David K
    Aug 10 at 23:51















Point $Q$ has $x, y, and z$. So wouldn’t $R$ also have those 3 parts?
– Ella
Aug 10 at 21:17




Point $Q$ has $x, y, and z$. So wouldn’t $R$ also have those 3 parts?
– Ella
Aug 10 at 21:17




1




1




Right, $z$ is dealt with similarly to $x$ and $y.$ I have added that detail to the answer.
– David K
Aug 10 at 21:35




Right, $z$ is dealt with similarly to $x$ and $y.$ I have added that detail to the answer.
– David K
Aug 10 at 21:35












I got (-1,-1, 5) as my answer. Does this seem correct?
– Ella
Aug 10 at 23:34




I got (-1,-1, 5) as my answer. Does this seem correct?
– Ella
Aug 10 at 23:34




1




1




Yes, I get the same.
– David K
Aug 10 at 23:51




Yes, I get the same.
– David K
Aug 10 at 23:51












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2878772%2ffinding-point-coordinates-that-have-been-reflected%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Carbon dioxide

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?