How to solve $8t^3-4t^2-4t+1=0$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












I obtain this cubic equation from solving the trigonometric equation $sin3x=sin4x$. I don't know how to solve it to obtain 3 roots.



Thank you!







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    The roots of this cubic aren't pretty. $tsim 0.62349, 0.22252,0.90097$
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 10 at 18:53











  • Also see here
    – John
    Aug 10 at 19:00










  • See also : math.stackexchange.com/questions/638874/…
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Aug 13 at 11:28














up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












I obtain this cubic equation from solving the trigonometric equation $sin3x=sin4x$. I don't know how to solve it to obtain 3 roots.



Thank you!







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    The roots of this cubic aren't pretty. $tsim 0.62349, 0.22252,0.90097$
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 10 at 18:53











  • Also see here
    – John
    Aug 10 at 19:00










  • See also : math.stackexchange.com/questions/638874/…
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Aug 13 at 11:28












up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1






1





I obtain this cubic equation from solving the trigonometric equation $sin3x=sin4x$. I don't know how to solve it to obtain 3 roots.



Thank you!







share|cite|improve this question














I obtain this cubic equation from solving the trigonometric equation $sin3x=sin4x$. I don't know how to solve it to obtain 3 roots.



Thank you!









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 10 at 22:17









dxiv

54.7k64798




54.7k64798










asked Aug 10 at 18:51









James Warthington

21427




21427







  • 1




    The roots of this cubic aren't pretty. $tsim 0.62349, 0.22252,0.90097$
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 10 at 18:53











  • Also see here
    – John
    Aug 10 at 19:00










  • See also : math.stackexchange.com/questions/638874/…
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Aug 13 at 11:28












  • 1




    The roots of this cubic aren't pretty. $tsim 0.62349, 0.22252,0.90097$
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 10 at 18:53











  • Also see here
    – John
    Aug 10 at 19:00










  • See also : math.stackexchange.com/questions/638874/…
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Aug 13 at 11:28







1




1




The roots of this cubic aren't pretty. $tsim 0.62349, 0.22252,0.90097$
– Rushabh Mehta
Aug 10 at 18:53





The roots of this cubic aren't pretty. $tsim 0.62349, 0.22252,0.90097$
– Rushabh Mehta
Aug 10 at 18:53













Also see here
– John
Aug 10 at 19:00




Also see here
– John
Aug 10 at 19:00












See also : math.stackexchange.com/questions/638874/…
– lab bhattacharjee
Aug 13 at 11:28




See also : math.stackexchange.com/questions/638874/…
– lab bhattacharjee
Aug 13 at 11:28










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
6
down vote



accepted










Added, Saturday: Gauss initiated the study of cyclotomic, umm, numbers, and a simple method for creating polynomials for which they were roots. This is discussed in modern terminology HERE. The jpeg at the bottom is from an 1875 book by Reuschle, with many, many such calculations. I put a list of such cubics with prime denominator at http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2022216/on-the-trigonometric-roots-of-a-cubic/2022887#2022887 With prime denominator, the cubic is $x^3 + x^2 - left( fracp-13 right) x + c$ with an integer $c.$ For denominator $9$ it is $x^3 - 3 x + 1$ instead, page 174 in Reuschle.



ORIGINAL. umm. The roots of
$$ x^3 + x^2 - 2 x - 1 $$
are
$$ 2 cos frac2pi7 ; , ; ; 2 cos frac4pi7 ; , ; ; 2 cos frac6pi7 ; . ; ; $$
Taking $$ x = -2t $$ gives
$$ -8t^3 + 4 t^2 + 4 t - 1 $$



enter image description here






share|cite|improve this answer





























    up vote
    3
    down vote














    solving the trigonometric equation $sin3x=sin4x$




    Hint:  use $,sin(a)-sin(b)=2 sinleft(fraca-b2right) cosleft(fraca+b2right),$ with $,a=4x,b=3x,$.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      When a cubic equation has are $3$ real roots, one uses a… trigonometric substitution: $;t=Acos theta$, and choose $A>0$ so we can use the formula for $cos 3theta$, and I doubt it is very useful in this case.




      Now the trigonometric equation $;sin 3x=sin 4x$ is very simple to
      solve with elementary tools:




      Just remember the basics of trigonometric equations:
      beginalign
      sin x&=sinalphaiff begincasessequivalphamod 2pi\[-1ex]qquadtext or \[-1ex]xequivpi-alphamod 2piendcases\[1ex]
      cos x&=cosalphaiff x equivpmalphamod 2pi \[1ex]
      tan x&=tanalphaiff x equivalphamod pi.
      endalign



      Therefore, the solutions of the trigonometric equation satisfy
      begincases
      4xequiv 3xmod 2piiff xequiv 0mod 2pi \[-1ex]qquadtext or \[-1ex]
      4xequiv pi- 3xmod 2piiff 7xequivpimod 2piiff xequivdfracpi7mod dfrac2pi7.
      endcases






      share|cite|improve this answer



























        up vote
        0
        down vote














        Solving the equation $8t^3-4t^2-4t+1=0$




        If you are familiar with numerical methods, you can use Newton's method to get one numerical solution. After that you might use long division to reduce to a quadratic equation and solve with the pq-formula.



        But this will not give 100% accurate solutions.






        share|cite|improve this answer




















        • So the roots of this cubic equation cannot be expressed in radical form? (closed form)
          – James Warthington
          Aug 10 at 19:01










        • I am sure, that they can, but this is not trivial. Will Jagy gave a nice answer.
          – Cornman
          Aug 10 at 19:08

















        up vote
        0
        down vote













        As Will has said, when you make the substitution $x=2t$, then your polynomial instantly becomes
        $$P(x)=x^3+x^2-2x-1$$
        The roots can be shown to be equal to$$beginalign*x_1 & =2cosfrac 2pi7\ x_2 & =2cosfrac 4pi7\x_3 & =2cosfrac 8pi7endalign*$$
        First, make the transformation $x=u+u^-1$ and expand to get that
        $$frac u^6+u^5+u^4+u^3+u^2+u+1u^3=0$$Multiply both sides by $u-1$ and clear the fraction to get$$u^7=1$$
        Through DeMoivre’s Theorem, the solution to $u$ is simply$$u=e^2kpi i/7$$where $k=0,1,2,ldots,6$. Therefore, by the original substitution$$x=e^2kpi i/7+e^-2kpi i/7=2cosfrac 2kpi7$$
        Now, make the appropriate substitutions for $k$ and multiply the result by $2$ to get back to $t$.






        share|cite|improve this answer



























          up vote
          -1
          down vote













          We have that



          $$sin3x=sin4x implies begincases3x=4x+2kpiimplies x=2kpi\3x=pi-4x+2kpiimplies x=fracpi7+frac2kpi7endcases$$






          share|cite|improve this answer




















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2878704%2fhow-to-solve-8t3-4t2-4t1-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            6 Answers
            6






            active

            oldest

            votes








            6 Answers
            6






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            6
            down vote



            accepted










            Added, Saturday: Gauss initiated the study of cyclotomic, umm, numbers, and a simple method for creating polynomials for which they were roots. This is discussed in modern terminology HERE. The jpeg at the bottom is from an 1875 book by Reuschle, with many, many such calculations. I put a list of such cubics with prime denominator at http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2022216/on-the-trigonometric-roots-of-a-cubic/2022887#2022887 With prime denominator, the cubic is $x^3 + x^2 - left( fracp-13 right) x + c$ with an integer $c.$ For denominator $9$ it is $x^3 - 3 x + 1$ instead, page 174 in Reuschle.



            ORIGINAL. umm. The roots of
            $$ x^3 + x^2 - 2 x - 1 $$
            are
            $$ 2 cos frac2pi7 ; , ; ; 2 cos frac4pi7 ; , ; ; 2 cos frac6pi7 ; . ; ; $$
            Taking $$ x = -2t $$ gives
            $$ -8t^3 + 4 t^2 + 4 t - 1 $$



            enter image description here






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              up vote
              6
              down vote



              accepted










              Added, Saturday: Gauss initiated the study of cyclotomic, umm, numbers, and a simple method for creating polynomials for which they were roots. This is discussed in modern terminology HERE. The jpeg at the bottom is from an 1875 book by Reuschle, with many, many such calculations. I put a list of such cubics with prime denominator at http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2022216/on-the-trigonometric-roots-of-a-cubic/2022887#2022887 With prime denominator, the cubic is $x^3 + x^2 - left( fracp-13 right) x + c$ with an integer $c.$ For denominator $9$ it is $x^3 - 3 x + 1$ instead, page 174 in Reuschle.



              ORIGINAL. umm. The roots of
              $$ x^3 + x^2 - 2 x - 1 $$
              are
              $$ 2 cos frac2pi7 ; , ; ; 2 cos frac4pi7 ; , ; ; 2 cos frac6pi7 ; . ; ; $$
              Taking $$ x = -2t $$ gives
              $$ -8t^3 + 4 t^2 + 4 t - 1 $$



              enter image description here






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                6
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                6
                down vote



                accepted






                Added, Saturday: Gauss initiated the study of cyclotomic, umm, numbers, and a simple method for creating polynomials for which they were roots. This is discussed in modern terminology HERE. The jpeg at the bottom is from an 1875 book by Reuschle, with many, many such calculations. I put a list of such cubics with prime denominator at http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2022216/on-the-trigonometric-roots-of-a-cubic/2022887#2022887 With prime denominator, the cubic is $x^3 + x^2 - left( fracp-13 right) x + c$ with an integer $c.$ For denominator $9$ it is $x^3 - 3 x + 1$ instead, page 174 in Reuschle.



                ORIGINAL. umm. The roots of
                $$ x^3 + x^2 - 2 x - 1 $$
                are
                $$ 2 cos frac2pi7 ; , ; ; 2 cos frac4pi7 ; , ; ; 2 cos frac6pi7 ; . ; ; $$
                Taking $$ x = -2t $$ gives
                $$ -8t^3 + 4 t^2 + 4 t - 1 $$



                enter image description here






                share|cite|improve this answer














                Added, Saturday: Gauss initiated the study of cyclotomic, umm, numbers, and a simple method for creating polynomials for which they were roots. This is discussed in modern terminology HERE. The jpeg at the bottom is from an 1875 book by Reuschle, with many, many such calculations. I put a list of such cubics with prime denominator at http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2022216/on-the-trigonometric-roots-of-a-cubic/2022887#2022887 With prime denominator, the cubic is $x^3 + x^2 - left( fracp-13 right) x + c$ with an integer $c.$ For denominator $9$ it is $x^3 - 3 x + 1$ instead, page 174 in Reuschle.



                ORIGINAL. umm. The roots of
                $$ x^3 + x^2 - 2 x - 1 $$
                are
                $$ 2 cos frac2pi7 ; , ; ; 2 cos frac4pi7 ; , ; ; 2 cos frac6pi7 ; . ; ; $$
                Taking $$ x = -2t $$ gives
                $$ -8t^3 + 4 t^2 + 4 t - 1 $$



                enter image description here







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Aug 11 at 19:04

























                answered Aug 10 at 19:07









                Will Jagy

                97.4k595196




                97.4k595196




















                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote














                    solving the trigonometric equation $sin3x=sin4x$




                    Hint:  use $,sin(a)-sin(b)=2 sinleft(fraca-b2right) cosleft(fraca+b2right),$ with $,a=4x,b=3x,$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer
























                      up vote
                      3
                      down vote














                      solving the trigonometric equation $sin3x=sin4x$




                      Hint:  use $,sin(a)-sin(b)=2 sinleft(fraca-b2right) cosleft(fraca+b2right),$ with $,a=4x,b=3x,$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer






















                        up vote
                        3
                        down vote










                        up vote
                        3
                        down vote










                        solving the trigonometric equation $sin3x=sin4x$




                        Hint:  use $,sin(a)-sin(b)=2 sinleft(fraca-b2right) cosleft(fraca+b2right),$ with $,a=4x,b=3x,$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer













                        solving the trigonometric equation $sin3x=sin4x$




                        Hint:  use $,sin(a)-sin(b)=2 sinleft(fraca-b2right) cosleft(fraca+b2right),$ with $,a=4x,b=3x,$.







                        share|cite|improve this answer












                        share|cite|improve this answer



                        share|cite|improve this answer










                        answered Aug 10 at 18:57









                        dxiv

                        54.7k64798




                        54.7k64798




















                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote













                            When a cubic equation has are $3$ real roots, one uses a… trigonometric substitution: $;t=Acos theta$, and choose $A>0$ so we can use the formula for $cos 3theta$, and I doubt it is very useful in this case.




                            Now the trigonometric equation $;sin 3x=sin 4x$ is very simple to
                            solve with elementary tools:




                            Just remember the basics of trigonometric equations:
                            beginalign
                            sin x&=sinalphaiff begincasessequivalphamod 2pi\[-1ex]qquadtext or \[-1ex]xequivpi-alphamod 2piendcases\[1ex]
                            cos x&=cosalphaiff x equivpmalphamod 2pi \[1ex]
                            tan x&=tanalphaiff x equivalphamod pi.
                            endalign



                            Therefore, the solutions of the trigonometric equation satisfy
                            begincases
                            4xequiv 3xmod 2piiff xequiv 0mod 2pi \[-1ex]qquadtext or \[-1ex]
                            4xequiv pi- 3xmod 2piiff 7xequivpimod 2piiff xequivdfracpi7mod dfrac2pi7.
                            endcases






                            share|cite|improve this answer
























                              up vote
                              1
                              down vote













                              When a cubic equation has are $3$ real roots, one uses a… trigonometric substitution: $;t=Acos theta$, and choose $A>0$ so we can use the formula for $cos 3theta$, and I doubt it is very useful in this case.




                              Now the trigonometric equation $;sin 3x=sin 4x$ is very simple to
                              solve with elementary tools:




                              Just remember the basics of trigonometric equations:
                              beginalign
                              sin x&=sinalphaiff begincasessequivalphamod 2pi\[-1ex]qquadtext or \[-1ex]xequivpi-alphamod 2piendcases\[1ex]
                              cos x&=cosalphaiff x equivpmalphamod 2pi \[1ex]
                              tan x&=tanalphaiff x equivalphamod pi.
                              endalign



                              Therefore, the solutions of the trigonometric equation satisfy
                              begincases
                              4xequiv 3xmod 2piiff xequiv 0mod 2pi \[-1ex]qquadtext or \[-1ex]
                              4xequiv pi- 3xmod 2piiff 7xequivpimod 2piiff xequivdfracpi7mod dfrac2pi7.
                              endcases






                              share|cite|improve this answer






















                                up vote
                                1
                                down vote










                                up vote
                                1
                                down vote









                                When a cubic equation has are $3$ real roots, one uses a… trigonometric substitution: $;t=Acos theta$, and choose $A>0$ so we can use the formula for $cos 3theta$, and I doubt it is very useful in this case.




                                Now the trigonometric equation $;sin 3x=sin 4x$ is very simple to
                                solve with elementary tools:




                                Just remember the basics of trigonometric equations:
                                beginalign
                                sin x&=sinalphaiff begincasessequivalphamod 2pi\[-1ex]qquadtext or \[-1ex]xequivpi-alphamod 2piendcases\[1ex]
                                cos x&=cosalphaiff x equivpmalphamod 2pi \[1ex]
                                tan x&=tanalphaiff x equivalphamod pi.
                                endalign



                                Therefore, the solutions of the trigonometric equation satisfy
                                begincases
                                4xequiv 3xmod 2piiff xequiv 0mod 2pi \[-1ex]qquadtext or \[-1ex]
                                4xequiv pi- 3xmod 2piiff 7xequivpimod 2piiff xequivdfracpi7mod dfrac2pi7.
                                endcases






                                share|cite|improve this answer












                                When a cubic equation has are $3$ real roots, one uses a… trigonometric substitution: $;t=Acos theta$, and choose $A>0$ so we can use the formula for $cos 3theta$, and I doubt it is very useful in this case.




                                Now the trigonometric equation $;sin 3x=sin 4x$ is very simple to
                                solve with elementary tools:




                                Just remember the basics of trigonometric equations:
                                beginalign
                                sin x&=sinalphaiff begincasessequivalphamod 2pi\[-1ex]qquadtext or \[-1ex]xequivpi-alphamod 2piendcases\[1ex]
                                cos x&=cosalphaiff x equivpmalphamod 2pi \[1ex]
                                tan x&=tanalphaiff x equivalphamod pi.
                                endalign



                                Therefore, the solutions of the trigonometric equation satisfy
                                begincases
                                4xequiv 3xmod 2piiff xequiv 0mod 2pi \[-1ex]qquadtext or \[-1ex]
                                4xequiv pi- 3xmod 2piiff 7xequivpimod 2piiff xequivdfracpi7mod dfrac2pi7.
                                endcases







                                share|cite|improve this answer












                                share|cite|improve this answer



                                share|cite|improve this answer










                                answered Aug 10 at 19:28









                                Bernard

                                111k635103




                                111k635103




















                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote














                                    Solving the equation $8t^3-4t^2-4t+1=0$




                                    If you are familiar with numerical methods, you can use Newton's method to get one numerical solution. After that you might use long division to reduce to a quadratic equation and solve with the pq-formula.



                                    But this will not give 100% accurate solutions.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer




















                                    • So the roots of this cubic equation cannot be expressed in radical form? (closed form)
                                      – James Warthington
                                      Aug 10 at 19:01










                                    • I am sure, that they can, but this is not trivial. Will Jagy gave a nice answer.
                                      – Cornman
                                      Aug 10 at 19:08














                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote














                                    Solving the equation $8t^3-4t^2-4t+1=0$




                                    If you are familiar with numerical methods, you can use Newton's method to get one numerical solution. After that you might use long division to reduce to a quadratic equation and solve with the pq-formula.



                                    But this will not give 100% accurate solutions.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer




















                                    • So the roots of this cubic equation cannot be expressed in radical form? (closed form)
                                      – James Warthington
                                      Aug 10 at 19:01










                                    • I am sure, that they can, but this is not trivial. Will Jagy gave a nice answer.
                                      – Cornman
                                      Aug 10 at 19:08












                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote










                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote










                                    Solving the equation $8t^3-4t^2-4t+1=0$




                                    If you are familiar with numerical methods, you can use Newton's method to get one numerical solution. After that you might use long division to reduce to a quadratic equation and solve with the pq-formula.



                                    But this will not give 100% accurate solutions.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer













                                    Solving the equation $8t^3-4t^2-4t+1=0$




                                    If you are familiar with numerical methods, you can use Newton's method to get one numerical solution. After that you might use long division to reduce to a quadratic equation and solve with the pq-formula.



                                    But this will not give 100% accurate solutions.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    answered Aug 10 at 18:56









                                    Cornman

                                    2,55221128




                                    2,55221128











                                    • So the roots of this cubic equation cannot be expressed in radical form? (closed form)
                                      – James Warthington
                                      Aug 10 at 19:01










                                    • I am sure, that they can, but this is not trivial. Will Jagy gave a nice answer.
                                      – Cornman
                                      Aug 10 at 19:08
















                                    • So the roots of this cubic equation cannot be expressed in radical form? (closed form)
                                      – James Warthington
                                      Aug 10 at 19:01










                                    • I am sure, that they can, but this is not trivial. Will Jagy gave a nice answer.
                                      – Cornman
                                      Aug 10 at 19:08















                                    So the roots of this cubic equation cannot be expressed in radical form? (closed form)
                                    – James Warthington
                                    Aug 10 at 19:01




                                    So the roots of this cubic equation cannot be expressed in radical form? (closed form)
                                    – James Warthington
                                    Aug 10 at 19:01












                                    I am sure, that they can, but this is not trivial. Will Jagy gave a nice answer.
                                    – Cornman
                                    Aug 10 at 19:08




                                    I am sure, that they can, but this is not trivial. Will Jagy gave a nice answer.
                                    – Cornman
                                    Aug 10 at 19:08










                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote













                                    As Will has said, when you make the substitution $x=2t$, then your polynomial instantly becomes
                                    $$P(x)=x^3+x^2-2x-1$$
                                    The roots can be shown to be equal to$$beginalign*x_1 & =2cosfrac 2pi7\ x_2 & =2cosfrac 4pi7\x_3 & =2cosfrac 8pi7endalign*$$
                                    First, make the transformation $x=u+u^-1$ and expand to get that
                                    $$frac u^6+u^5+u^4+u^3+u^2+u+1u^3=0$$Multiply both sides by $u-1$ and clear the fraction to get$$u^7=1$$
                                    Through DeMoivre’s Theorem, the solution to $u$ is simply$$u=e^2kpi i/7$$where $k=0,1,2,ldots,6$. Therefore, by the original substitution$$x=e^2kpi i/7+e^-2kpi i/7=2cosfrac 2kpi7$$
                                    Now, make the appropriate substitutions for $k$ and multiply the result by $2$ to get back to $t$.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer
























                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote













                                      As Will has said, when you make the substitution $x=2t$, then your polynomial instantly becomes
                                      $$P(x)=x^3+x^2-2x-1$$
                                      The roots can be shown to be equal to$$beginalign*x_1 & =2cosfrac 2pi7\ x_2 & =2cosfrac 4pi7\x_3 & =2cosfrac 8pi7endalign*$$
                                      First, make the transformation $x=u+u^-1$ and expand to get that
                                      $$frac u^6+u^5+u^4+u^3+u^2+u+1u^3=0$$Multiply both sides by $u-1$ and clear the fraction to get$$u^7=1$$
                                      Through DeMoivre’s Theorem, the solution to $u$ is simply$$u=e^2kpi i/7$$where $k=0,1,2,ldots,6$. Therefore, by the original substitution$$x=e^2kpi i/7+e^-2kpi i/7=2cosfrac 2kpi7$$
                                      Now, make the appropriate substitutions for $k$ and multiply the result by $2$ to get back to $t$.






                                      share|cite|improve this answer






















                                        up vote
                                        0
                                        down vote










                                        up vote
                                        0
                                        down vote









                                        As Will has said, when you make the substitution $x=2t$, then your polynomial instantly becomes
                                        $$P(x)=x^3+x^2-2x-1$$
                                        The roots can be shown to be equal to$$beginalign*x_1 & =2cosfrac 2pi7\ x_2 & =2cosfrac 4pi7\x_3 & =2cosfrac 8pi7endalign*$$
                                        First, make the transformation $x=u+u^-1$ and expand to get that
                                        $$frac u^6+u^5+u^4+u^3+u^2+u+1u^3=0$$Multiply both sides by $u-1$ and clear the fraction to get$$u^7=1$$
                                        Through DeMoivre’s Theorem, the solution to $u$ is simply$$u=e^2kpi i/7$$where $k=0,1,2,ldots,6$. Therefore, by the original substitution$$x=e^2kpi i/7+e^-2kpi i/7=2cosfrac 2kpi7$$
                                        Now, make the appropriate substitutions for $k$ and multiply the result by $2$ to get back to $t$.






                                        share|cite|improve this answer












                                        As Will has said, when you make the substitution $x=2t$, then your polynomial instantly becomes
                                        $$P(x)=x^3+x^2-2x-1$$
                                        The roots can be shown to be equal to$$beginalign*x_1 & =2cosfrac 2pi7\ x_2 & =2cosfrac 4pi7\x_3 & =2cosfrac 8pi7endalign*$$
                                        First, make the transformation $x=u+u^-1$ and expand to get that
                                        $$frac u^6+u^5+u^4+u^3+u^2+u+1u^3=0$$Multiply both sides by $u-1$ and clear the fraction to get$$u^7=1$$
                                        Through DeMoivre’s Theorem, the solution to $u$ is simply$$u=e^2kpi i/7$$where $k=0,1,2,ldots,6$. Therefore, by the original substitution$$x=e^2kpi i/7+e^-2kpi i/7=2cosfrac 2kpi7$$
                                        Now, make the appropriate substitutions for $k$ and multiply the result by $2$ to get back to $t$.







                                        share|cite|improve this answer












                                        share|cite|improve this answer



                                        share|cite|improve this answer










                                        answered Aug 10 at 19:27









                                        Frank W.

                                        1,9661315




                                        1,9661315




















                                            up vote
                                            -1
                                            down vote













                                            We have that



                                            $$sin3x=sin4x implies begincases3x=4x+2kpiimplies x=2kpi\3x=pi-4x+2kpiimplies x=fracpi7+frac2kpi7endcases$$






                                            share|cite|improve this answer
























                                              up vote
                                              -1
                                              down vote













                                              We have that



                                              $$sin3x=sin4x implies begincases3x=4x+2kpiimplies x=2kpi\3x=pi-4x+2kpiimplies x=fracpi7+frac2kpi7endcases$$






                                              share|cite|improve this answer






















                                                up vote
                                                -1
                                                down vote










                                                up vote
                                                -1
                                                down vote









                                                We have that



                                                $$sin3x=sin4x implies begincases3x=4x+2kpiimplies x=2kpi\3x=pi-4x+2kpiimplies x=fracpi7+frac2kpi7endcases$$






                                                share|cite|improve this answer












                                                We have that



                                                $$sin3x=sin4x implies begincases3x=4x+2kpiimplies x=2kpi\3x=pi-4x+2kpiimplies x=fracpi7+frac2kpi7endcases$$







                                                share|cite|improve this answer












                                                share|cite|improve this answer



                                                share|cite|improve this answer










                                                answered Aug 10 at 19:40









                                                gimusi

                                                66.1k73685




                                                66.1k73685






















                                                     

                                                    draft saved


                                                    draft discarded


























                                                     


                                                    draft saved


                                                    draft discarded














                                                    StackExchange.ready(
                                                    function ()
                                                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2878704%2fhow-to-solve-8t3-4t2-4t1-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                                    );

                                                    Post as a guest













































































                                                    這個網誌中的熱門文章

                                                    How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                                                    Mutual Information Always Non-negative

                                                    Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?