A finite convex function in $(a,b)$ is continuous. Moreover, $phi'$ exists except at most in a countable set and is monotone increasing

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












If $phi$ is finite and convex in $(a, b)$, then $phi$ is continuous in $(a, b)$. Moreover, $phi'$ exists except at most in a countable set and is monotone increasing.




Theorem 2.8 Every function of bounded variation has at most a countable number of discontinuities, and they are all of the first kind (jump or removable discontinuities).




  • How does $(7.41)$ show in particular that $phi$ is continuous in $(a,b)$? Don't we need to show $D^-phi(x) = D^+phi(x)$ as $hto 0+$? The book shows $D^-phi(x) = D^+phi(x)$ at the end of the proof.

enter image description hereenter image description here







share|cite|improve this question






















  • @mfl This is Theorem 7.40 on page 157 of Measure and integral by Wheeden and Zygmund. The theorem on page 157 doesn't state that $phi$ is finite, but since they say $D^+phi$ is of bounded variation I looked up the beginning of this section on page 154, and they suppose $phi$ is finite on an open interval $(a,b)$. Also see the comment by Michael Grant on this post math.stackexchange.com/q/258511/426645.
    – user398843
    Aug 10 at 22:32











  • @mfl The interval here is open, the one in the counterexample is compact, and the compactness plays a role there.
    – amsmath
    Aug 10 at 22:37














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












If $phi$ is finite and convex in $(a, b)$, then $phi$ is continuous in $(a, b)$. Moreover, $phi'$ exists except at most in a countable set and is monotone increasing.




Theorem 2.8 Every function of bounded variation has at most a countable number of discontinuities, and they are all of the first kind (jump or removable discontinuities).




  • How does $(7.41)$ show in particular that $phi$ is continuous in $(a,b)$? Don't we need to show $D^-phi(x) = D^+phi(x)$ as $hto 0+$? The book shows $D^-phi(x) = D^+phi(x)$ at the end of the proof.

enter image description hereenter image description here







share|cite|improve this question






















  • @mfl This is Theorem 7.40 on page 157 of Measure and integral by Wheeden and Zygmund. The theorem on page 157 doesn't state that $phi$ is finite, but since they say $D^+phi$ is of bounded variation I looked up the beginning of this section on page 154, and they suppose $phi$ is finite on an open interval $(a,b)$. Also see the comment by Michael Grant on this post math.stackexchange.com/q/258511/426645.
    – user398843
    Aug 10 at 22:32











  • @mfl The interval here is open, the one in the counterexample is compact, and the compactness plays a role there.
    – amsmath
    Aug 10 at 22:37












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











If $phi$ is finite and convex in $(a, b)$, then $phi$ is continuous in $(a, b)$. Moreover, $phi'$ exists except at most in a countable set and is monotone increasing.




Theorem 2.8 Every function of bounded variation has at most a countable number of discontinuities, and they are all of the first kind (jump or removable discontinuities).




  • How does $(7.41)$ show in particular that $phi$ is continuous in $(a,b)$? Don't we need to show $D^-phi(x) = D^+phi(x)$ as $hto 0+$? The book shows $D^-phi(x) = D^+phi(x)$ at the end of the proof.

enter image description hereenter image description here







share|cite|improve this question














If $phi$ is finite and convex in $(a, b)$, then $phi$ is continuous in $(a, b)$. Moreover, $phi'$ exists except at most in a countable set and is monotone increasing.




Theorem 2.8 Every function of bounded variation has at most a countable number of discontinuities, and they are all of the first kind (jump or removable discontinuities).




  • How does $(7.41)$ show in particular that $phi$ is continuous in $(a,b)$? Don't we need to show $D^-phi(x) = D^+phi(x)$ as $hto 0+$? The book shows $D^-phi(x) = D^+phi(x)$ at the end of the proof.

enter image description hereenter image description here









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 10 at 22:21

























asked Aug 10 at 22:08









user398843

399215




399215











  • @mfl This is Theorem 7.40 on page 157 of Measure and integral by Wheeden and Zygmund. The theorem on page 157 doesn't state that $phi$ is finite, but since they say $D^+phi$ is of bounded variation I looked up the beginning of this section on page 154, and they suppose $phi$ is finite on an open interval $(a,b)$. Also see the comment by Michael Grant on this post math.stackexchange.com/q/258511/426645.
    – user398843
    Aug 10 at 22:32











  • @mfl The interval here is open, the one in the counterexample is compact, and the compactness plays a role there.
    – amsmath
    Aug 10 at 22:37
















  • @mfl This is Theorem 7.40 on page 157 of Measure and integral by Wheeden and Zygmund. The theorem on page 157 doesn't state that $phi$ is finite, but since they say $D^+phi$ is of bounded variation I looked up the beginning of this section on page 154, and they suppose $phi$ is finite on an open interval $(a,b)$. Also see the comment by Michael Grant on this post math.stackexchange.com/q/258511/426645.
    – user398843
    Aug 10 at 22:32











  • @mfl The interval here is open, the one in the counterexample is compact, and the compactness plays a role there.
    – amsmath
    Aug 10 at 22:37















@mfl This is Theorem 7.40 on page 157 of Measure and integral by Wheeden and Zygmund. The theorem on page 157 doesn't state that $phi$ is finite, but since they say $D^+phi$ is of bounded variation I looked up the beginning of this section on page 154, and they suppose $phi$ is finite on an open interval $(a,b)$. Also see the comment by Michael Grant on this post math.stackexchange.com/q/258511/426645.
– user398843
Aug 10 at 22:32





@mfl This is Theorem 7.40 on page 157 of Measure and integral by Wheeden and Zygmund. The theorem on page 157 doesn't state that $phi$ is finite, but since they say $D^+phi$ is of bounded variation I looked up the beginning of this section on page 154, and they suppose $phi$ is finite on an open interval $(a,b)$. Also see the comment by Michael Grant on this post math.stackexchange.com/q/258511/426645.
– user398843
Aug 10 at 22:32













@mfl The interval here is open, the one in the counterexample is compact, and the compactness plays a role there.
– amsmath
Aug 10 at 22:37




@mfl The interval here is open, the one in the counterexample is compact, and the compactness plays a role there.
– amsmath
Aug 10 at 22:37










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










The existence of the limit $D^+phi(x)$ tells us in particular that $phi(x+h)tophi(x)$ as $hto 0+$. Similarly, the existence of $D^-phi(x)$ implies $phi(x-h)tophi(x)$ as $hto 0+$. These together yield that $phi$ is continuous at $x$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2878859%2fa-finite-convex-function-in-a-b-is-continuous-moreover-phi-exists-exce%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted










    The existence of the limit $D^+phi(x)$ tells us in particular that $phi(x+h)tophi(x)$ as $hto 0+$. Similarly, the existence of $D^-phi(x)$ implies $phi(x-h)tophi(x)$ as $hto 0+$. These together yield that $phi$ is continuous at $x$.






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      0
      down vote



      accepted










      The existence of the limit $D^+phi(x)$ tells us in particular that $phi(x+h)tophi(x)$ as $hto 0+$. Similarly, the existence of $D^-phi(x)$ implies $phi(x-h)tophi(x)$ as $hto 0+$. These together yield that $phi$ is continuous at $x$.






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted






        The existence of the limit $D^+phi(x)$ tells us in particular that $phi(x+h)tophi(x)$ as $hto 0+$. Similarly, the existence of $D^-phi(x)$ implies $phi(x-h)tophi(x)$ as $hto 0+$. These together yield that $phi$ is continuous at $x$.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        The existence of the limit $D^+phi(x)$ tells us in particular that $phi(x+h)tophi(x)$ as $hto 0+$. Similarly, the existence of $D^-phi(x)$ implies $phi(x-h)tophi(x)$ as $hto 0+$. These together yield that $phi$ is continuous at $x$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 10 at 22:43









        amsmath

        1,622114




        1,622114






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2878859%2fa-finite-convex-function-in-a-b-is-continuous-moreover-phi-exists-exce%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            Carbon dioxide

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?