Prove that $2^x cdot 3^y - 5^z cdot 7^w = 1$ has no solutions

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Prove that $$2^x cdot 3^y - 5^z cdot 7^w = 1$$ has no solutions in $mathbbZ^+$, if $yge 3$.
number-theory elementary-number-theory modular-arithmetic contest-math diophantine-equations
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Prove that $$2^x cdot 3^y - 5^z cdot 7^w = 1$$ has no solutions in $mathbbZ^+$, if $yge 3$.
number-theory elementary-number-theory modular-arithmetic contest-math diophantine-equations
Størmer's theorem says that there are a finite number of solutions, and provides a method to construct all of them. Have you tried that?
â Ryan
Mar 15 '14 at 18:24
Actually I have solved it for y=0, 1, and 2. There wasn't any solution (x, y, z, w) with y>2, so I want to show that if y>=3, no solutions exist.
â L.Fetahu
Mar 15 '14 at 18:55
May you post yor solution for those cases?
â chubakueno
Mar 15 '14 at 19:06
Let finish first the final case y>2.
â L.Fetahu
Mar 15 '14 at 19:16
4
Posting your solutiob wont hurt anybody, really. It shows your thoughts and effort. Also forcing everyone to reinvent the wheel is not the best thing to do.
â chubakueno
Mar 15 '14 at 20:19
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Prove that $$2^x cdot 3^y - 5^z cdot 7^w = 1$$ has no solutions in $mathbbZ^+$, if $yge 3$.
number-theory elementary-number-theory modular-arithmetic contest-math diophantine-equations
Prove that $$2^x cdot 3^y - 5^z cdot 7^w = 1$$ has no solutions in $mathbbZ^+$, if $yge 3$.
number-theory elementary-number-theory modular-arithmetic contest-math diophantine-equations
edited Aug 10 at 11:28
greedoid
26.7k93575
26.7k93575
asked Mar 15 '14 at 18:16
L.Fetahu
704
704
Størmer's theorem says that there are a finite number of solutions, and provides a method to construct all of them. Have you tried that?
â Ryan
Mar 15 '14 at 18:24
Actually I have solved it for y=0, 1, and 2. There wasn't any solution (x, y, z, w) with y>2, so I want to show that if y>=3, no solutions exist.
â L.Fetahu
Mar 15 '14 at 18:55
May you post yor solution for those cases?
â chubakueno
Mar 15 '14 at 19:06
Let finish first the final case y>2.
â L.Fetahu
Mar 15 '14 at 19:16
4
Posting your solutiob wont hurt anybody, really. It shows your thoughts and effort. Also forcing everyone to reinvent the wheel is not the best thing to do.
â chubakueno
Mar 15 '14 at 20:19
add a comment |Â
Størmer's theorem says that there are a finite number of solutions, and provides a method to construct all of them. Have you tried that?
â Ryan
Mar 15 '14 at 18:24
Actually I have solved it for y=0, 1, and 2. There wasn't any solution (x, y, z, w) with y>2, so I want to show that if y>=3, no solutions exist.
â L.Fetahu
Mar 15 '14 at 18:55
May you post yor solution for those cases?
â chubakueno
Mar 15 '14 at 19:06
Let finish first the final case y>2.
â L.Fetahu
Mar 15 '14 at 19:16
4
Posting your solutiob wont hurt anybody, really. It shows your thoughts and effort. Also forcing everyone to reinvent the wheel is not the best thing to do.
â chubakueno
Mar 15 '14 at 20:19
Størmer's theorem says that there are a finite number of solutions, and provides a method to construct all of them. Have you tried that?
â Ryan
Mar 15 '14 at 18:24
Størmer's theorem says that there are a finite number of solutions, and provides a method to construct all of them. Have you tried that?
â Ryan
Mar 15 '14 at 18:24
Actually I have solved it for y=0, 1, and 2. There wasn't any solution (x, y, z, w) with y>2, so I want to show that if y>=3, no solutions exist.
â L.Fetahu
Mar 15 '14 at 18:55
Actually I have solved it for y=0, 1, and 2. There wasn't any solution (x, y, z, w) with y>2, so I want to show that if y>=3, no solutions exist.
â L.Fetahu
Mar 15 '14 at 18:55
May you post yor solution for those cases?
â chubakueno
Mar 15 '14 at 19:06
May you post yor solution for those cases?
â chubakueno
Mar 15 '14 at 19:06
Let finish first the final case y>2.
â L.Fetahu
Mar 15 '14 at 19:16
Let finish first the final case y>2.
â L.Fetahu
Mar 15 '14 at 19:16
4
4
Posting your solutiob wont hurt anybody, really. It shows your thoughts and effort. Also forcing everyone to reinvent the wheel is not the best thing to do.
â chubakueno
Mar 15 '14 at 20:19
Posting your solutiob wont hurt anybody, really. It shows your thoughts and effort. Also forcing everyone to reinvent the wheel is not the best thing to do.
â chubakueno
Mar 15 '14 at 20:19
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
Consider any rational number $2^x 3^y 5^-z 7^-w$, where $x$, $y$, $z$, $w in mathbbZ^+$ . Størmer's theorem guarantees that there are a finite number of such fractions where the numerator and denominator are consecutive integers.
Here are all of the solutions:
$frac76, frac87, frac1514, frac2120, frac2827, frac3635, frac4948, frac5049, frac6463, frac126125, frac225224, frac24012400, frac43754374$
We only care about solutions where the numerator is $2^x 3^y$, and where the denominator is $5^z 7^w$ (for positive $x$, $y$, $z$, $w$). The only fraction which satisfies this condition is $frac3635$, or $(x, y, z, w) = (2, 2, 1, 1)$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Here's a proof without Størmer's theorem, relying purely on (a lot of) modular arithmetic:
Observation 1: $z$ is odd.
Reducing mod $3$ shows that
$$1=2^xcdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv-(-1)^zpmod3.$$
Observation 2: $x=2$ and $yequiv2pmod12$.
Reducing mod $8$ shows that if $xgeq3$ then
$$1=2^xcdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv-5^zcdot7^wpmod8,$$
which implies that $z$ is even, a contradiction, hence $xleq 2$. Reducing mod $5$ and $7$ shows that
$$1equiv2^xcdot3^yequiv2^x-ypmod5
qquadtext and qquad
1equiv2^xcdot3^yequiv3^2x+ypmod7,$$
which tells us that $x-yequiv0pmod4$ and $2x+yequiv0pmod6$. It follows that $y$ is even and hence also $x$ is even. Because $xleq2$ we find that $x=2$ and hence that $yequiv2pmod12$.
Observation 3: $w=1$.
Reducing mod $8$ shows that
$$1equiv4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv4-5cdot7^wpmod8,$$
because $y$ is even and $z$ is odd, and so $w$ is also odd. Reducing mod $49$ shows that if $wgeq2$ then
$$1=4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv4cdot3^ypmod49,$$
which implies that $yequiv32pmod42$. Then reducing mod $43$ shows that
$$1=4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv9-5^zcdot7^wpmod43,$$
and hence $5^zcdot7^wequiv8pmod43$. But $5$, $7$ and $8$ are all quadratic nonresidues mod $43$, and $z$ and $w$ are odd, a contradiction, hence $w=1$.
Observation 4: $y=2$.
Reducing mod $27$ shows that if $ygeq3$ then
$$1=4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7equiv-5^zcdot7pmod27,$$
which implies that $zequiv13pmod18$. Then $5^zequiv17pmod19$ so reducing mod $19$ then shows that
$$1=4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7equiv4cdot3^y-17cdot7equiv4cdot3^y-5pmod19,$$
and so $4cdot3^yequiv6pmod19$. But $4cdot3^yequiv5,16,17pmod19$ because $yequiv2pmod6$, a contradiction, hence $yleq2$. Because $y$ is even we find that $y=2$.
Conclusion: The only solution to
$$2^xcdot3^y-5^zcdot7^w=1,$$
in the positive integers is $(x,y,z,w)=(2,2,1,1)$.
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
Consider any rational number $2^x 3^y 5^-z 7^-w$, where $x$, $y$, $z$, $w in mathbbZ^+$ . Størmer's theorem guarantees that there are a finite number of such fractions where the numerator and denominator are consecutive integers.
Here are all of the solutions:
$frac76, frac87, frac1514, frac2120, frac2827, frac3635, frac4948, frac5049, frac6463, frac126125, frac225224, frac24012400, frac43754374$
We only care about solutions where the numerator is $2^x 3^y$, and where the denominator is $5^z 7^w$ (for positive $x$, $y$, $z$, $w$). The only fraction which satisfies this condition is $frac3635$, or $(x, y, z, w) = (2, 2, 1, 1)$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Consider any rational number $2^x 3^y 5^-z 7^-w$, where $x$, $y$, $z$, $w in mathbbZ^+$ . Størmer's theorem guarantees that there are a finite number of such fractions where the numerator and denominator are consecutive integers.
Here are all of the solutions:
$frac76, frac87, frac1514, frac2120, frac2827, frac3635, frac4948, frac5049, frac6463, frac126125, frac225224, frac24012400, frac43754374$
We only care about solutions where the numerator is $2^x 3^y$, and where the denominator is $5^z 7^w$ (for positive $x$, $y$, $z$, $w$). The only fraction which satisfies this condition is $frac3635$, or $(x, y, z, w) = (2, 2, 1, 1)$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Consider any rational number $2^x 3^y 5^-z 7^-w$, where $x$, $y$, $z$, $w in mathbbZ^+$ . Størmer's theorem guarantees that there are a finite number of such fractions where the numerator and denominator are consecutive integers.
Here are all of the solutions:
$frac76, frac87, frac1514, frac2120, frac2827, frac3635, frac4948, frac5049, frac6463, frac126125, frac225224, frac24012400, frac43754374$
We only care about solutions where the numerator is $2^x 3^y$, and where the denominator is $5^z 7^w$ (for positive $x$, $y$, $z$, $w$). The only fraction which satisfies this condition is $frac3635$, or $(x, y, z, w) = (2, 2, 1, 1)$.
Consider any rational number $2^x 3^y 5^-z 7^-w$, where $x$, $y$, $z$, $w in mathbbZ^+$ . Størmer's theorem guarantees that there are a finite number of such fractions where the numerator and denominator are consecutive integers.
Here are all of the solutions:
$frac76, frac87, frac1514, frac2120, frac2827, frac3635, frac4948, frac5049, frac6463, frac126125, frac225224, frac24012400, frac43754374$
We only care about solutions where the numerator is $2^x 3^y$, and where the denominator is $5^z 7^w$ (for positive $x$, $y$, $z$, $w$). The only fraction which satisfies this condition is $frac3635$, or $(x, y, z, w) = (2, 2, 1, 1)$.
answered Mar 15 '14 at 19:30
Ryan
825626
825626
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Here's a proof without Størmer's theorem, relying purely on (a lot of) modular arithmetic:
Observation 1: $z$ is odd.
Reducing mod $3$ shows that
$$1=2^xcdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv-(-1)^zpmod3.$$
Observation 2: $x=2$ and $yequiv2pmod12$.
Reducing mod $8$ shows that if $xgeq3$ then
$$1=2^xcdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv-5^zcdot7^wpmod8,$$
which implies that $z$ is even, a contradiction, hence $xleq 2$. Reducing mod $5$ and $7$ shows that
$$1equiv2^xcdot3^yequiv2^x-ypmod5
qquadtext and qquad
1equiv2^xcdot3^yequiv3^2x+ypmod7,$$
which tells us that $x-yequiv0pmod4$ and $2x+yequiv0pmod6$. It follows that $y$ is even and hence also $x$ is even. Because $xleq2$ we find that $x=2$ and hence that $yequiv2pmod12$.
Observation 3: $w=1$.
Reducing mod $8$ shows that
$$1equiv4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv4-5cdot7^wpmod8,$$
because $y$ is even and $z$ is odd, and so $w$ is also odd. Reducing mod $49$ shows that if $wgeq2$ then
$$1=4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv4cdot3^ypmod49,$$
which implies that $yequiv32pmod42$. Then reducing mod $43$ shows that
$$1=4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv9-5^zcdot7^wpmod43,$$
and hence $5^zcdot7^wequiv8pmod43$. But $5$, $7$ and $8$ are all quadratic nonresidues mod $43$, and $z$ and $w$ are odd, a contradiction, hence $w=1$.
Observation 4: $y=2$.
Reducing mod $27$ shows that if $ygeq3$ then
$$1=4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7equiv-5^zcdot7pmod27,$$
which implies that $zequiv13pmod18$. Then $5^zequiv17pmod19$ so reducing mod $19$ then shows that
$$1=4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7equiv4cdot3^y-17cdot7equiv4cdot3^y-5pmod19,$$
and so $4cdot3^yequiv6pmod19$. But $4cdot3^yequiv5,16,17pmod19$ because $yequiv2pmod6$, a contradiction, hence $yleq2$. Because $y$ is even we find that $y=2$.
Conclusion: The only solution to
$$2^xcdot3^y-5^zcdot7^w=1,$$
in the positive integers is $(x,y,z,w)=(2,2,1,1)$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Here's a proof without Størmer's theorem, relying purely on (a lot of) modular arithmetic:
Observation 1: $z$ is odd.
Reducing mod $3$ shows that
$$1=2^xcdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv-(-1)^zpmod3.$$
Observation 2: $x=2$ and $yequiv2pmod12$.
Reducing mod $8$ shows that if $xgeq3$ then
$$1=2^xcdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv-5^zcdot7^wpmod8,$$
which implies that $z$ is even, a contradiction, hence $xleq 2$. Reducing mod $5$ and $7$ shows that
$$1equiv2^xcdot3^yequiv2^x-ypmod5
qquadtext and qquad
1equiv2^xcdot3^yequiv3^2x+ypmod7,$$
which tells us that $x-yequiv0pmod4$ and $2x+yequiv0pmod6$. It follows that $y$ is even and hence also $x$ is even. Because $xleq2$ we find that $x=2$ and hence that $yequiv2pmod12$.
Observation 3: $w=1$.
Reducing mod $8$ shows that
$$1equiv4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv4-5cdot7^wpmod8,$$
because $y$ is even and $z$ is odd, and so $w$ is also odd. Reducing mod $49$ shows that if $wgeq2$ then
$$1=4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv4cdot3^ypmod49,$$
which implies that $yequiv32pmod42$. Then reducing mod $43$ shows that
$$1=4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv9-5^zcdot7^wpmod43,$$
and hence $5^zcdot7^wequiv8pmod43$. But $5$, $7$ and $8$ are all quadratic nonresidues mod $43$, and $z$ and $w$ are odd, a contradiction, hence $w=1$.
Observation 4: $y=2$.
Reducing mod $27$ shows that if $ygeq3$ then
$$1=4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7equiv-5^zcdot7pmod27,$$
which implies that $zequiv13pmod18$. Then $5^zequiv17pmod19$ so reducing mod $19$ then shows that
$$1=4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7equiv4cdot3^y-17cdot7equiv4cdot3^y-5pmod19,$$
and so $4cdot3^yequiv6pmod19$. But $4cdot3^yequiv5,16,17pmod19$ because $yequiv2pmod6$, a contradiction, hence $yleq2$. Because $y$ is even we find that $y=2$.
Conclusion: The only solution to
$$2^xcdot3^y-5^zcdot7^w=1,$$
in the positive integers is $(x,y,z,w)=(2,2,1,1)$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Here's a proof without Størmer's theorem, relying purely on (a lot of) modular arithmetic:
Observation 1: $z$ is odd.
Reducing mod $3$ shows that
$$1=2^xcdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv-(-1)^zpmod3.$$
Observation 2: $x=2$ and $yequiv2pmod12$.
Reducing mod $8$ shows that if $xgeq3$ then
$$1=2^xcdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv-5^zcdot7^wpmod8,$$
which implies that $z$ is even, a contradiction, hence $xleq 2$. Reducing mod $5$ and $7$ shows that
$$1equiv2^xcdot3^yequiv2^x-ypmod5
qquadtext and qquad
1equiv2^xcdot3^yequiv3^2x+ypmod7,$$
which tells us that $x-yequiv0pmod4$ and $2x+yequiv0pmod6$. It follows that $y$ is even and hence also $x$ is even. Because $xleq2$ we find that $x=2$ and hence that $yequiv2pmod12$.
Observation 3: $w=1$.
Reducing mod $8$ shows that
$$1equiv4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv4-5cdot7^wpmod8,$$
because $y$ is even and $z$ is odd, and so $w$ is also odd. Reducing mod $49$ shows that if $wgeq2$ then
$$1=4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv4cdot3^ypmod49,$$
which implies that $yequiv32pmod42$. Then reducing mod $43$ shows that
$$1=4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv9-5^zcdot7^wpmod43,$$
and hence $5^zcdot7^wequiv8pmod43$. But $5$, $7$ and $8$ are all quadratic nonresidues mod $43$, and $z$ and $w$ are odd, a contradiction, hence $w=1$.
Observation 4: $y=2$.
Reducing mod $27$ shows that if $ygeq3$ then
$$1=4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7equiv-5^zcdot7pmod27,$$
which implies that $zequiv13pmod18$. Then $5^zequiv17pmod19$ so reducing mod $19$ then shows that
$$1=4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7equiv4cdot3^y-17cdot7equiv4cdot3^y-5pmod19,$$
and so $4cdot3^yequiv6pmod19$. But $4cdot3^yequiv5,16,17pmod19$ because $yequiv2pmod6$, a contradiction, hence $yleq2$. Because $y$ is even we find that $y=2$.
Conclusion: The only solution to
$$2^xcdot3^y-5^zcdot7^w=1,$$
in the positive integers is $(x,y,z,w)=(2,2,1,1)$.
Here's a proof without Størmer's theorem, relying purely on (a lot of) modular arithmetic:
Observation 1: $z$ is odd.
Reducing mod $3$ shows that
$$1=2^xcdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv-(-1)^zpmod3.$$
Observation 2: $x=2$ and $yequiv2pmod12$.
Reducing mod $8$ shows that if $xgeq3$ then
$$1=2^xcdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv-5^zcdot7^wpmod8,$$
which implies that $z$ is even, a contradiction, hence $xleq 2$. Reducing mod $5$ and $7$ shows that
$$1equiv2^xcdot3^yequiv2^x-ypmod5
qquadtext and qquad
1equiv2^xcdot3^yequiv3^2x+ypmod7,$$
which tells us that $x-yequiv0pmod4$ and $2x+yequiv0pmod6$. It follows that $y$ is even and hence also $x$ is even. Because $xleq2$ we find that $x=2$ and hence that $yequiv2pmod12$.
Observation 3: $w=1$.
Reducing mod $8$ shows that
$$1equiv4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv4-5cdot7^wpmod8,$$
because $y$ is even and $z$ is odd, and so $w$ is also odd. Reducing mod $49$ shows that if $wgeq2$ then
$$1=4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv4cdot3^ypmod49,$$
which implies that $yequiv32pmod42$. Then reducing mod $43$ shows that
$$1=4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7^wequiv9-5^zcdot7^wpmod43,$$
and hence $5^zcdot7^wequiv8pmod43$. But $5$, $7$ and $8$ are all quadratic nonresidues mod $43$, and $z$ and $w$ are odd, a contradiction, hence $w=1$.
Observation 4: $y=2$.
Reducing mod $27$ shows that if $ygeq3$ then
$$1=4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7equiv-5^zcdot7pmod27,$$
which implies that $zequiv13pmod18$. Then $5^zequiv17pmod19$ so reducing mod $19$ then shows that
$$1=4cdot3^y-5^zcdot7equiv4cdot3^y-17cdot7equiv4cdot3^y-5pmod19,$$
and so $4cdot3^yequiv6pmod19$. But $4cdot3^yequiv5,16,17pmod19$ because $yequiv2pmod6$, a contradiction, hence $yleq2$. Because $y$ is even we find that $y=2$.
Conclusion: The only solution to
$$2^xcdot3^y-5^zcdot7^w=1,$$
in the positive integers is $(x,y,z,w)=(2,2,1,1)$.
answered Aug 10 at 14:06
Servaes
20.4k33484
20.4k33484
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f713432%2fprove-that-2x-cdot-3y-5z-cdot-7w-1-has-no-solutions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Størmer's theorem says that there are a finite number of solutions, and provides a method to construct all of them. Have you tried that?
â Ryan
Mar 15 '14 at 18:24
Actually I have solved it for y=0, 1, and 2. There wasn't any solution (x, y, z, w) with y>2, so I want to show that if y>=3, no solutions exist.
â L.Fetahu
Mar 15 '14 at 18:55
May you post yor solution for those cases?
â chubakueno
Mar 15 '14 at 19:06
Let finish first the final case y>2.
â L.Fetahu
Mar 15 '14 at 19:16
4
Posting your solutiob wont hurt anybody, really. It shows your thoughts and effort. Also forcing everyone to reinvent the wheel is not the best thing to do.
â chubakueno
Mar 15 '14 at 20:19