Regarding Whether or Not Two Dynamical Systems are Topologically Conjugate

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite













Consider the two systems of ODEs
$$
begincasesdotx_1=-lambda_1x_1\dotx_2=-lambda_2x_2endcasestext and begincasesdoty_1=ay_1+by_2\doty_2=-by_1+ay_2endcases.
$$
The question is to determine whether these systems are topologically conjugate or not.




I was given the following definition of topologically conjugate dynamical systems:



Two systems $dotx= f(x_1,x_2)$, $doty= f(y_1,y_2)$ are topologically conjugate if there exists a continuous, invertible function (or "map") $F :(x_1,x_2) -> (y_1,y_2)$ which takes values in $(x_1,x_2)$ and maps them over to $(y_1,y_2)$ coordinates. So in other words, we have a continuously invertible $F$ such that $gcirc F = Fcirc f$.



This is my attempt:



Notice that the solution to the ODEs on the left is



The system on the left has solution:



beginequation*
mathbf x(t) = c_1 e^-lambda_1 t mathbf v_1 + c_2 e^-lambda_2 t mathbf v_2.
endequation*



Here , $mathbf v_1$, $mathbf v_2$ are both eigenvectors of the system on the left.



The one on the right has solution:



beginequation*
mathbf y(t)
=
c_1
e^alpha t
beginpmatrix
cos beta t \ - sin beta t
endpmatrix
+
c_2 e^alpha t
beginpmatrix
sin beta t \ cos beta t
endpmatrix.
endequation*



The question is if we can now explicitly find a map $F$ in $(x_1,x_2)$ such that it changes to $(y_1,y_2)$ coordinates.



So, using the solution the first system, we may write:



beginequation*
mathbf y(t) =
beginpmatrix
cos beta t & sin beta t \
-sin beta t & cos beta t
endpmatrix
beginpmatrix
c_1x_1(-fracatlambda_1) \ c_2x_2(-fracatlambda_2)
endpmatrix
endequation*



We easily notice that the matrix of transformation is invertible, as determinant is equal to 1. So, using this logic, we can say that there exists an invertible, continuous map such that the two dynamical systems are topologically conjugate.



Is this correct? I feel I am missing something crucial.



Thanks.







share|cite|improve this question
























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite













    Consider the two systems of ODEs
    $$
    begincasesdotx_1=-lambda_1x_1\dotx_2=-lambda_2x_2endcasestext and begincasesdoty_1=ay_1+by_2\doty_2=-by_1+ay_2endcases.
    $$
    The question is to determine whether these systems are topologically conjugate or not.




    I was given the following definition of topologically conjugate dynamical systems:



    Two systems $dotx= f(x_1,x_2)$, $doty= f(y_1,y_2)$ are topologically conjugate if there exists a continuous, invertible function (or "map") $F :(x_1,x_2) -> (y_1,y_2)$ which takes values in $(x_1,x_2)$ and maps them over to $(y_1,y_2)$ coordinates. So in other words, we have a continuously invertible $F$ such that $gcirc F = Fcirc f$.



    This is my attempt:



    Notice that the solution to the ODEs on the left is



    The system on the left has solution:



    beginequation*
    mathbf x(t) = c_1 e^-lambda_1 t mathbf v_1 + c_2 e^-lambda_2 t mathbf v_2.
    endequation*



    Here , $mathbf v_1$, $mathbf v_2$ are both eigenvectors of the system on the left.



    The one on the right has solution:



    beginequation*
    mathbf y(t)
    =
    c_1
    e^alpha t
    beginpmatrix
    cos beta t \ - sin beta t
    endpmatrix
    +
    c_2 e^alpha t
    beginpmatrix
    sin beta t \ cos beta t
    endpmatrix.
    endequation*



    The question is if we can now explicitly find a map $F$ in $(x_1,x_2)$ such that it changes to $(y_1,y_2)$ coordinates.



    So, using the solution the first system, we may write:



    beginequation*
    mathbf y(t) =
    beginpmatrix
    cos beta t & sin beta t \
    -sin beta t & cos beta t
    endpmatrix
    beginpmatrix
    c_1x_1(-fracatlambda_1) \ c_2x_2(-fracatlambda_2)
    endpmatrix
    endequation*



    We easily notice that the matrix of transformation is invertible, as determinant is equal to 1. So, using this logic, we can say that there exists an invertible, continuous map such that the two dynamical systems are topologically conjugate.



    Is this correct? I feel I am missing something crucial.



    Thanks.







    share|cite|improve this question






















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite












      Consider the two systems of ODEs
      $$
      begincasesdotx_1=-lambda_1x_1\dotx_2=-lambda_2x_2endcasestext and begincasesdoty_1=ay_1+by_2\doty_2=-by_1+ay_2endcases.
      $$
      The question is to determine whether these systems are topologically conjugate or not.




      I was given the following definition of topologically conjugate dynamical systems:



      Two systems $dotx= f(x_1,x_2)$, $doty= f(y_1,y_2)$ are topologically conjugate if there exists a continuous, invertible function (or "map") $F :(x_1,x_2) -> (y_1,y_2)$ which takes values in $(x_1,x_2)$ and maps them over to $(y_1,y_2)$ coordinates. So in other words, we have a continuously invertible $F$ such that $gcirc F = Fcirc f$.



      This is my attempt:



      Notice that the solution to the ODEs on the left is



      The system on the left has solution:



      beginequation*
      mathbf x(t) = c_1 e^-lambda_1 t mathbf v_1 + c_2 e^-lambda_2 t mathbf v_2.
      endequation*



      Here , $mathbf v_1$, $mathbf v_2$ are both eigenvectors of the system on the left.



      The one on the right has solution:



      beginequation*
      mathbf y(t)
      =
      c_1
      e^alpha t
      beginpmatrix
      cos beta t \ - sin beta t
      endpmatrix
      +
      c_2 e^alpha t
      beginpmatrix
      sin beta t \ cos beta t
      endpmatrix.
      endequation*



      The question is if we can now explicitly find a map $F$ in $(x_1,x_2)$ such that it changes to $(y_1,y_2)$ coordinates.



      So, using the solution the first system, we may write:



      beginequation*
      mathbf y(t) =
      beginpmatrix
      cos beta t & sin beta t \
      -sin beta t & cos beta t
      endpmatrix
      beginpmatrix
      c_1x_1(-fracatlambda_1) \ c_2x_2(-fracatlambda_2)
      endpmatrix
      endequation*



      We easily notice that the matrix of transformation is invertible, as determinant is equal to 1. So, using this logic, we can say that there exists an invertible, continuous map such that the two dynamical systems are topologically conjugate.



      Is this correct? I feel I am missing something crucial.



      Thanks.







      share|cite|improve this question













      Consider the two systems of ODEs
      $$
      begincasesdotx_1=-lambda_1x_1\dotx_2=-lambda_2x_2endcasestext and begincasesdoty_1=ay_1+by_2\doty_2=-by_1+ay_2endcases.
      $$
      The question is to determine whether these systems are topologically conjugate or not.




      I was given the following definition of topologically conjugate dynamical systems:



      Two systems $dotx= f(x_1,x_2)$, $doty= f(y_1,y_2)$ are topologically conjugate if there exists a continuous, invertible function (or "map") $F :(x_1,x_2) -> (y_1,y_2)$ which takes values in $(x_1,x_2)$ and maps them over to $(y_1,y_2)$ coordinates. So in other words, we have a continuously invertible $F$ such that $gcirc F = Fcirc f$.



      This is my attempt:



      Notice that the solution to the ODEs on the left is



      The system on the left has solution:



      beginequation*
      mathbf x(t) = c_1 e^-lambda_1 t mathbf v_1 + c_2 e^-lambda_2 t mathbf v_2.
      endequation*



      Here , $mathbf v_1$, $mathbf v_2$ are both eigenvectors of the system on the left.



      The one on the right has solution:



      beginequation*
      mathbf y(t)
      =
      c_1
      e^alpha t
      beginpmatrix
      cos beta t \ - sin beta t
      endpmatrix
      +
      c_2 e^alpha t
      beginpmatrix
      sin beta t \ cos beta t
      endpmatrix.
      endequation*



      The question is if we can now explicitly find a map $F$ in $(x_1,x_2)$ such that it changes to $(y_1,y_2)$ coordinates.



      So, using the solution the first system, we may write:



      beginequation*
      mathbf y(t) =
      beginpmatrix
      cos beta t & sin beta t \
      -sin beta t & cos beta t
      endpmatrix
      beginpmatrix
      c_1x_1(-fracatlambda_1) \ c_2x_2(-fracatlambda_2)
      endpmatrix
      endequation*



      We easily notice that the matrix of transformation is invertible, as determinant is equal to 1. So, using this logic, we can say that there exists an invertible, continuous map such that the two dynamical systems are topologically conjugate.



      Is this correct? I feel I am missing something crucial.



      Thanks.









      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Aug 29 at 4:51









      LordVader007

      145113




      145113

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2897962%2fregarding-whether-or-not-two-dynamical-systems-are-topologically-conjugate%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2897962%2fregarding-whether-or-not-two-dynamical-systems-are-topologically-conjugate%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          1st Magritte Awards