Do we know a transcendental number with a proven bounded continued fraction expansion?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












The simple continued-fraction-expansion for the transcendental number $e$ is known to be unbounded. What about bounded continued fractions ?




Do we know any transcendental number for which it is proven that the simple continued-fraction-expansion is bounded ?




It is conjectured that the simple continued-fraction-expansion of the algebraic numbers with minimal polynomial degree greater than $2$ are unbounded.



If this would be true, every bounded non-periodic infinite simple continued-fraction-expansion would correspond with a transcendental number.



But to my knowledge, it was not proven for a single algebraic number with minimal polynomial degree greater than $2$, that its simple continued-fraction-expansion is unbounded.







share|cite|improve this question
























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    The simple continued-fraction-expansion for the transcendental number $e$ is known to be unbounded. What about bounded continued fractions ?




    Do we know any transcendental number for which it is proven that the simple continued-fraction-expansion is bounded ?




    It is conjectured that the simple continued-fraction-expansion of the algebraic numbers with minimal polynomial degree greater than $2$ are unbounded.



    If this would be true, every bounded non-periodic infinite simple continued-fraction-expansion would correspond with a transcendental number.



    But to my knowledge, it was not proven for a single algebraic number with minimal polynomial degree greater than $2$, that its simple continued-fraction-expansion is unbounded.







    share|cite|improve this question






















      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      The simple continued-fraction-expansion for the transcendental number $e$ is known to be unbounded. What about bounded continued fractions ?




      Do we know any transcendental number for which it is proven that the simple continued-fraction-expansion is bounded ?




      It is conjectured that the simple continued-fraction-expansion of the algebraic numbers with minimal polynomial degree greater than $2$ are unbounded.



      If this would be true, every bounded non-periodic infinite simple continued-fraction-expansion would correspond with a transcendental number.



      But to my knowledge, it was not proven for a single algebraic number with minimal polynomial degree greater than $2$, that its simple continued-fraction-expansion is unbounded.







      share|cite|improve this question












      The simple continued-fraction-expansion for the transcendental number $e$ is known to be unbounded. What about bounded continued fractions ?




      Do we know any transcendental number for which it is proven that the simple continued-fraction-expansion is bounded ?




      It is conjectured that the simple continued-fraction-expansion of the algebraic numbers with minimal polynomial degree greater than $2$ are unbounded.



      If this would be true, every bounded non-periodic infinite simple continued-fraction-expansion would correspond with a transcendental number.



      But to my knowledge, it was not proven for a single algebraic number with minimal polynomial degree greater than $2$, that its simple continued-fraction-expansion is unbounded.









      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Feb 2 '17 at 23:05









      Peter

      45.3k1039119




      45.3k1039119




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Yes, but the transcendentals that this answer describes are quite unnatural.



          Fix any noncomputable bounded sequence of positive integers $alpha$, and let $r_alpha$ be the real number whose continued fraction expansion is given by $alpha$. Then - since the continued fraction expansion of a computable real is computable, and every algebraic real is computable - $r_alpha$ is transcendental. Note that the nontrivial part here is proving transcendentality!






          share|cite|improve this answer



























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            There must be lots of them. There are uncountably many sequences consisting of $1$s and $2$s. If you consider them as continued fractions, at most countably many are algebraic, so most of them are transcendental. That doesn't let me pick out a specific one, however, as transcendental.






            share|cite|improve this answer




















              Your Answer




              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: false,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2126551%2fdo-we-know-a-transcendental-number-with-a-proven-bounded-continued-fraction-expa%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest






























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Yes, but the transcendentals that this answer describes are quite unnatural.



              Fix any noncomputable bounded sequence of positive integers $alpha$, and let $r_alpha$ be the real number whose continued fraction expansion is given by $alpha$. Then - since the continued fraction expansion of a computable real is computable, and every algebraic real is computable - $r_alpha$ is transcendental. Note that the nontrivial part here is proving transcendentality!






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                Yes, but the transcendentals that this answer describes are quite unnatural.



                Fix any noncomputable bounded sequence of positive integers $alpha$, and let $r_alpha$ be the real number whose continued fraction expansion is given by $alpha$. Then - since the continued fraction expansion of a computable real is computable, and every algebraic real is computable - $r_alpha$ is transcendental. Note that the nontrivial part here is proving transcendentality!






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  Yes, but the transcendentals that this answer describes are quite unnatural.



                  Fix any noncomputable bounded sequence of positive integers $alpha$, and let $r_alpha$ be the real number whose continued fraction expansion is given by $alpha$. Then - since the continued fraction expansion of a computable real is computable, and every algebraic real is computable - $r_alpha$ is transcendental. Note that the nontrivial part here is proving transcendentality!






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  Yes, but the transcendentals that this answer describes are quite unnatural.



                  Fix any noncomputable bounded sequence of positive integers $alpha$, and let $r_alpha$ be the real number whose continued fraction expansion is given by $alpha$. Then - since the continued fraction expansion of a computable real is computable, and every algebraic real is computable - $r_alpha$ is transcendental. Note that the nontrivial part here is proving transcendentality!







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Feb 2 '17 at 23:15









                  Noah Schweber

                  112k9142266




                  112k9142266




















                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote













                      There must be lots of them. There are uncountably many sequences consisting of $1$s and $2$s. If you consider them as continued fractions, at most countably many are algebraic, so most of them are transcendental. That doesn't let me pick out a specific one, however, as transcendental.






                      share|cite|improve this answer
























                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        There must be lots of them. There are uncountably many sequences consisting of $1$s and $2$s. If you consider them as continued fractions, at most countably many are algebraic, so most of them are transcendental. That doesn't let me pick out a specific one, however, as transcendental.






                        share|cite|improve this answer






















                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote









                          There must be lots of them. There are uncountably many sequences consisting of $1$s and $2$s. If you consider them as continued fractions, at most countably many are algebraic, so most of them are transcendental. That doesn't let me pick out a specific one, however, as transcendental.






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          There must be lots of them. There are uncountably many sequences consisting of $1$s and $2$s. If you consider them as continued fractions, at most countably many are algebraic, so most of them are transcendental. That doesn't let me pick out a specific one, however, as transcendental.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Aug 29 at 0:54









                          Ross Millikan

                          279k22189355




                          279k22189355



























                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded















































                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2126551%2fdo-we-know-a-transcendental-number-with-a-proven-bounded-continued-fraction-expa%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest













































































                              這個網誌中的熱門文章

                              tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

                              How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                              1st Magritte Awards