Do we know a transcendental number with a proven bounded continued fraction expansion?

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
The simple continued-fraction-expansion for the transcendental number $e$ is known to be unbounded. What about bounded continued fractions ?
Do we know any transcendental number for which it is proven that the simple continued-fraction-expansion is bounded ?
It is conjectured that the simple continued-fraction-expansion of the algebraic numbers with minimal polynomial degree greater than $2$ are unbounded.
If this would be true, every bounded non-periodic infinite simple continued-fraction-expansion would correspond with a transcendental number.
But to my knowledge, it was not proven for a single algebraic number with minimal polynomial degree greater than $2$, that its simple continued-fraction-expansion is unbounded.
number-theory continued-fractions transcendental-numbers
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
The simple continued-fraction-expansion for the transcendental number $e$ is known to be unbounded. What about bounded continued fractions ?
Do we know any transcendental number for which it is proven that the simple continued-fraction-expansion is bounded ?
It is conjectured that the simple continued-fraction-expansion of the algebraic numbers with minimal polynomial degree greater than $2$ are unbounded.
If this would be true, every bounded non-periodic infinite simple continued-fraction-expansion would correspond with a transcendental number.
But to my knowledge, it was not proven for a single algebraic number with minimal polynomial degree greater than $2$, that its simple continued-fraction-expansion is unbounded.
number-theory continued-fractions transcendental-numbers
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
The simple continued-fraction-expansion for the transcendental number $e$ is known to be unbounded. What about bounded continued fractions ?
Do we know any transcendental number for which it is proven that the simple continued-fraction-expansion is bounded ?
It is conjectured that the simple continued-fraction-expansion of the algebraic numbers with minimal polynomial degree greater than $2$ are unbounded.
If this would be true, every bounded non-periodic infinite simple continued-fraction-expansion would correspond with a transcendental number.
But to my knowledge, it was not proven for a single algebraic number with minimal polynomial degree greater than $2$, that its simple continued-fraction-expansion is unbounded.
number-theory continued-fractions transcendental-numbers
The simple continued-fraction-expansion for the transcendental number $e$ is known to be unbounded. What about bounded continued fractions ?
Do we know any transcendental number for which it is proven that the simple continued-fraction-expansion is bounded ?
It is conjectured that the simple continued-fraction-expansion of the algebraic numbers with minimal polynomial degree greater than $2$ are unbounded.
If this would be true, every bounded non-periodic infinite simple continued-fraction-expansion would correspond with a transcendental number.
But to my knowledge, it was not proven for a single algebraic number with minimal polynomial degree greater than $2$, that its simple continued-fraction-expansion is unbounded.
number-theory continued-fractions transcendental-numbers
asked Feb 2 '17 at 23:05
Peter
45.3k1039119
45.3k1039119
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Yes, but the transcendentals that this answer describes are quite unnatural.
Fix any noncomputable bounded sequence of positive integers $alpha$, and let $r_alpha$ be the real number whose continued fraction expansion is given by $alpha$. Then - since the continued fraction expansion of a computable real is computable, and every algebraic real is computable - $r_alpha$ is transcendental. Note that the nontrivial part here is proving transcendentality!
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
There must be lots of them. There are uncountably many sequences consisting of $1$s and $2$s. If you consider them as continued fractions, at most countably many are algebraic, so most of them are transcendental. That doesn't let me pick out a specific one, however, as transcendental.
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Yes, but the transcendentals that this answer describes are quite unnatural.
Fix any noncomputable bounded sequence of positive integers $alpha$, and let $r_alpha$ be the real number whose continued fraction expansion is given by $alpha$. Then - since the continued fraction expansion of a computable real is computable, and every algebraic real is computable - $r_alpha$ is transcendental. Note that the nontrivial part here is proving transcendentality!
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Yes, but the transcendentals that this answer describes are quite unnatural.
Fix any noncomputable bounded sequence of positive integers $alpha$, and let $r_alpha$ be the real number whose continued fraction expansion is given by $alpha$. Then - since the continued fraction expansion of a computable real is computable, and every algebraic real is computable - $r_alpha$ is transcendental. Note that the nontrivial part here is proving transcendentality!
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Yes, but the transcendentals that this answer describes are quite unnatural.
Fix any noncomputable bounded sequence of positive integers $alpha$, and let $r_alpha$ be the real number whose continued fraction expansion is given by $alpha$. Then - since the continued fraction expansion of a computable real is computable, and every algebraic real is computable - $r_alpha$ is transcendental. Note that the nontrivial part here is proving transcendentality!
Yes, but the transcendentals that this answer describes are quite unnatural.
Fix any noncomputable bounded sequence of positive integers $alpha$, and let $r_alpha$ be the real number whose continued fraction expansion is given by $alpha$. Then - since the continued fraction expansion of a computable real is computable, and every algebraic real is computable - $r_alpha$ is transcendental. Note that the nontrivial part here is proving transcendentality!
answered Feb 2 '17 at 23:15
Noah Schweber
112k9142266
112k9142266
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
There must be lots of them. There are uncountably many sequences consisting of $1$s and $2$s. If you consider them as continued fractions, at most countably many are algebraic, so most of them are transcendental. That doesn't let me pick out a specific one, however, as transcendental.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
There must be lots of them. There are uncountably many sequences consisting of $1$s and $2$s. If you consider them as continued fractions, at most countably many are algebraic, so most of them are transcendental. That doesn't let me pick out a specific one, however, as transcendental.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
There must be lots of them. There are uncountably many sequences consisting of $1$s and $2$s. If you consider them as continued fractions, at most countably many are algebraic, so most of them are transcendental. That doesn't let me pick out a specific one, however, as transcendental.
There must be lots of them. There are uncountably many sequences consisting of $1$s and $2$s. If you consider them as continued fractions, at most countably many are algebraic, so most of them are transcendental. That doesn't let me pick out a specific one, however, as transcendental.
answered Aug 29 at 0:54
Ross Millikan
279k22189355
279k22189355
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2126551%2fdo-we-know-a-transcendental-number-with-a-proven-bounded-continued-fraction-expa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password