With $alpha>0$, showing that $int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt$ goes to $0$ as $kto+infty$
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
My idea was to compute the derivative of the integrand, in order to find its maximum in $[0,1]$. It turns out it is attained at $t=sqrtfracalphaalpha+2k$. Then the claim follows from $$0<int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdtleleft(fracalphaalpha+2kright)^alpha/2left(1-fracalphaalpha+2kright)^kto0.$$
Is this correct? How else could one do it?
real-analysis integration sequences-and-series definite-integrals upper-lower-bounds
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
My idea was to compute the derivative of the integrand, in order to find its maximum in $[0,1]$. It turns out it is attained at $t=sqrtfracalphaalpha+2k$. Then the claim follows from $$0<int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdtleleft(fracalphaalpha+2kright)^alpha/2left(1-fracalphaalpha+2kright)^kto0.$$
Is this correct? How else could one do it?
real-analysis integration sequences-and-series definite-integrals upper-lower-bounds
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
My idea was to compute the derivative of the integrand, in order to find its maximum in $[0,1]$. It turns out it is attained at $t=sqrtfracalphaalpha+2k$. Then the claim follows from $$0<int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdtleleft(fracalphaalpha+2kright)^alpha/2left(1-fracalphaalpha+2kright)^kto0.$$
Is this correct? How else could one do it?
real-analysis integration sequences-and-series definite-integrals upper-lower-bounds
My idea was to compute the derivative of the integrand, in order to find its maximum in $[0,1]$. It turns out it is attained at $t=sqrtfracalphaalpha+2k$. Then the claim follows from $$0<int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdtleleft(fracalphaalpha+2kright)^alpha/2left(1-fracalphaalpha+2kright)^kto0.$$
Is this correct? How else could one do it?
real-analysis integration sequences-and-series definite-integrals upper-lower-bounds
edited Aug 29 at 8:39
asked Aug 29 at 8:32
Richard
544512
544512
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Your method seems fine to me.
Another way is as follow :
$$forall t in [0,1], 0 le t^alpha(1-t^2)^k le 1$$
But $1 in L^1([0,1])$. So by dominated convergence theorem :
$$lim_k to infty int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt=int_0^1 lim_k to infty t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt=int_0^10~dt=0$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
I suppose your $alpha $ is positive. Your proof is correct. If you know measure theory you can get it immediately from DCT: the integrand tends to $0$ because $1-t^2<1$ and the integrand is dominated by $t^alpha$ which is integrable.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Alternative method.
Solution. $blacktriangleleft$ Consider the upper limit. Compute as follows.
beginalign*
varlimsup_k left|int_0^1 t^alpha (1 - t^2)^kmathrm d tright| &leqslant varlimsup_k left(int_0^c + int_c^1right)t^alpha (1 - t^2)^k mathrm dt quad [text the function geqslant 0, cin (0,1)] \
&leqslant varlimsup_k int_0^c (1-t^2)^kmathrm dt + varlimsup_k int_c^1 (1- t^2)^k mathrm d t quad [t^alpha leqslant1]\
&leqslant int_0^c mathrm dt + varlimsup_k int_c^1 (1-c^2)^k mathrm dt quad [1 geqslant 1 -t^2 searrow 0]\
&=c + varlimsup_k(1-c)(1 -c^2)^k\
&= c + 0 quad[1-c^2<1, (1-c^2)^k to 0 text as k to infty]\
&= c to 0 quad [c to 0^+]. blacktriangleright
endalign*
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Another way via Beta and Gamma functions $$int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt= int_0^1 t^alpha/2+1/2-1(1-t)^k+1-1dt \=B(alpha/2+1/2,k+1)=fracGamma(alpha/2+1/2)Gamma(k+1)Gamma(alpha/2+k+3/2)to 0$$
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Your method seems fine to me.
Another way is as follow :
$$forall t in [0,1], 0 le t^alpha(1-t^2)^k le 1$$
But $1 in L^1([0,1])$. So by dominated convergence theorem :
$$lim_k to infty int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt=int_0^1 lim_k to infty t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt=int_0^10~dt=0$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Your method seems fine to me.
Another way is as follow :
$$forall t in [0,1], 0 le t^alpha(1-t^2)^k le 1$$
But $1 in L^1([0,1])$. So by dominated convergence theorem :
$$lim_k to infty int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt=int_0^1 lim_k to infty t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt=int_0^10~dt=0$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Your method seems fine to me.
Another way is as follow :
$$forall t in [0,1], 0 le t^alpha(1-t^2)^k le 1$$
But $1 in L^1([0,1])$. So by dominated convergence theorem :
$$lim_k to infty int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt=int_0^1 lim_k to infty t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt=int_0^10~dt=0$$
Your method seems fine to me.
Another way is as follow :
$$forall t in [0,1], 0 le t^alpha(1-t^2)^k le 1$$
But $1 in L^1([0,1])$. So by dominated convergence theorem :
$$lim_k to infty int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt=int_0^1 lim_k to infty t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt=int_0^10~dt=0$$
answered Aug 29 at 8:38
nicomezi
3,6721819
3,6721819
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
I suppose your $alpha $ is positive. Your proof is correct. If you know measure theory you can get it immediately from DCT: the integrand tends to $0$ because $1-t^2<1$ and the integrand is dominated by $t^alpha$ which is integrable.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
I suppose your $alpha $ is positive. Your proof is correct. If you know measure theory you can get it immediately from DCT: the integrand tends to $0$ because $1-t^2<1$ and the integrand is dominated by $t^alpha$ which is integrable.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
I suppose your $alpha $ is positive. Your proof is correct. If you know measure theory you can get it immediately from DCT: the integrand tends to $0$ because $1-t^2<1$ and the integrand is dominated by $t^alpha$ which is integrable.
I suppose your $alpha $ is positive. Your proof is correct. If you know measure theory you can get it immediately from DCT: the integrand tends to $0$ because $1-t^2<1$ and the integrand is dominated by $t^alpha$ which is integrable.
answered Aug 29 at 8:38
Kavi Rama Murthy
25k31234
25k31234
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Alternative method.
Solution. $blacktriangleleft$ Consider the upper limit. Compute as follows.
beginalign*
varlimsup_k left|int_0^1 t^alpha (1 - t^2)^kmathrm d tright| &leqslant varlimsup_k left(int_0^c + int_c^1right)t^alpha (1 - t^2)^k mathrm dt quad [text the function geqslant 0, cin (0,1)] \
&leqslant varlimsup_k int_0^c (1-t^2)^kmathrm dt + varlimsup_k int_c^1 (1- t^2)^k mathrm d t quad [t^alpha leqslant1]\
&leqslant int_0^c mathrm dt + varlimsup_k int_c^1 (1-c^2)^k mathrm dt quad [1 geqslant 1 -t^2 searrow 0]\
&=c + varlimsup_k(1-c)(1 -c^2)^k\
&= c + 0 quad[1-c^2<1, (1-c^2)^k to 0 text as k to infty]\
&= c to 0 quad [c to 0^+]. blacktriangleright
endalign*
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Alternative method.
Solution. $blacktriangleleft$ Consider the upper limit. Compute as follows.
beginalign*
varlimsup_k left|int_0^1 t^alpha (1 - t^2)^kmathrm d tright| &leqslant varlimsup_k left(int_0^c + int_c^1right)t^alpha (1 - t^2)^k mathrm dt quad [text the function geqslant 0, cin (0,1)] \
&leqslant varlimsup_k int_0^c (1-t^2)^kmathrm dt + varlimsup_k int_c^1 (1- t^2)^k mathrm d t quad [t^alpha leqslant1]\
&leqslant int_0^c mathrm dt + varlimsup_k int_c^1 (1-c^2)^k mathrm dt quad [1 geqslant 1 -t^2 searrow 0]\
&=c + varlimsup_k(1-c)(1 -c^2)^k\
&= c + 0 quad[1-c^2<1, (1-c^2)^k to 0 text as k to infty]\
&= c to 0 quad [c to 0^+]. blacktriangleright
endalign*
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Alternative method.
Solution. $blacktriangleleft$ Consider the upper limit. Compute as follows.
beginalign*
varlimsup_k left|int_0^1 t^alpha (1 - t^2)^kmathrm d tright| &leqslant varlimsup_k left(int_0^c + int_c^1right)t^alpha (1 - t^2)^k mathrm dt quad [text the function geqslant 0, cin (0,1)] \
&leqslant varlimsup_k int_0^c (1-t^2)^kmathrm dt + varlimsup_k int_c^1 (1- t^2)^k mathrm d t quad [t^alpha leqslant1]\
&leqslant int_0^c mathrm dt + varlimsup_k int_c^1 (1-c^2)^k mathrm dt quad [1 geqslant 1 -t^2 searrow 0]\
&=c + varlimsup_k(1-c)(1 -c^2)^k\
&= c + 0 quad[1-c^2<1, (1-c^2)^k to 0 text as k to infty]\
&= c to 0 quad [c to 0^+]. blacktriangleright
endalign*
Alternative method.
Solution. $blacktriangleleft$ Consider the upper limit. Compute as follows.
beginalign*
varlimsup_k left|int_0^1 t^alpha (1 - t^2)^kmathrm d tright| &leqslant varlimsup_k left(int_0^c + int_c^1right)t^alpha (1 - t^2)^k mathrm dt quad [text the function geqslant 0, cin (0,1)] \
&leqslant varlimsup_k int_0^c (1-t^2)^kmathrm dt + varlimsup_k int_c^1 (1- t^2)^k mathrm d t quad [t^alpha leqslant1]\
&leqslant int_0^c mathrm dt + varlimsup_k int_c^1 (1-c^2)^k mathrm dt quad [1 geqslant 1 -t^2 searrow 0]\
&=c + varlimsup_k(1-c)(1 -c^2)^k\
&= c + 0 quad[1-c^2<1, (1-c^2)^k to 0 text as k to infty]\
&= c to 0 quad [c to 0^+]. blacktriangleright
endalign*
answered Aug 29 at 9:12
xbh
3,242320
3,242320
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Another way via Beta and Gamma functions $$int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt= int_0^1 t^alpha/2+1/2-1(1-t)^k+1-1dt \=B(alpha/2+1/2,k+1)=fracGamma(alpha/2+1/2)Gamma(k+1)Gamma(alpha/2+k+3/2)to 0$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Another way via Beta and Gamma functions $$int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt= int_0^1 t^alpha/2+1/2-1(1-t)^k+1-1dt \=B(alpha/2+1/2,k+1)=fracGamma(alpha/2+1/2)Gamma(k+1)Gamma(alpha/2+k+3/2)to 0$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Another way via Beta and Gamma functions $$int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt= int_0^1 t^alpha/2+1/2-1(1-t)^k+1-1dt \=B(alpha/2+1/2,k+1)=fracGamma(alpha/2+1/2)Gamma(k+1)Gamma(alpha/2+k+3/2)to 0$$
Another way via Beta and Gamma functions $$int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt= int_0^1 t^alpha/2+1/2-1(1-t)^k+1-1dt \=B(alpha/2+1/2,k+1)=fracGamma(alpha/2+1/2)Gamma(k+1)Gamma(alpha/2+k+3/2)to 0$$
answered Aug 29 at 9:22
Guy Fsone
16.9k42671
16.9k42671
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2898104%2fwith-alpha0-showing-that-int-01-t-alpha1-t2kdt-goes-to-0-as-k-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password