With $alpha>0$, showing that $int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt$ goes to $0$ as $kto+infty$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












My idea was to compute the derivative of the integrand, in order to find its maximum in $[0,1]$. It turns out it is attained at $t=sqrtfracalphaalpha+2k$. Then the claim follows from $$0<int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdtleleft(fracalphaalpha+2kright)^alpha/2left(1-fracalphaalpha+2kright)^kto0.$$



Is this correct? How else could one do it?







share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    My idea was to compute the derivative of the integrand, in order to find its maximum in $[0,1]$. It turns out it is attained at $t=sqrtfracalphaalpha+2k$. Then the claim follows from $$0<int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdtleleft(fracalphaalpha+2kright)^alpha/2left(1-fracalphaalpha+2kright)^kto0.$$



    Is this correct? How else could one do it?







    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      My idea was to compute the derivative of the integrand, in order to find its maximum in $[0,1]$. It turns out it is attained at $t=sqrtfracalphaalpha+2k$. Then the claim follows from $$0<int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdtleleft(fracalphaalpha+2kright)^alpha/2left(1-fracalphaalpha+2kright)^kto0.$$



      Is this correct? How else could one do it?







      share|cite|improve this question














      My idea was to compute the derivative of the integrand, in order to find its maximum in $[0,1]$. It turns out it is attained at $t=sqrtfracalphaalpha+2k$. Then the claim follows from $$0<int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdtleleft(fracalphaalpha+2kright)^alpha/2left(1-fracalphaalpha+2kright)^kto0.$$



      Is this correct? How else could one do it?









      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 29 at 8:39

























      asked Aug 29 at 8:32









      Richard

      544512




      544512




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          Your method seems fine to me.



          Another way is as follow :



          $$forall t in [0,1], 0 le t^alpha(1-t^2)^k le 1$$



          But $1 in L^1([0,1])$. So by dominated convergence theorem :



          $$lim_k to infty int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt=int_0^1 lim_k to infty t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt=int_0^10~dt=0$$






          share|cite|improve this answer



























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            I suppose your $alpha $ is positive. Your proof is correct. If you know measure theory you can get it immediately from DCT: the integrand tends to $0$ because $1-t^2<1$ and the integrand is dominated by $t^alpha$ which is integrable.






            share|cite|improve this answer



























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Alternative method.



              Solution. $blacktriangleleft$ Consider the upper limit. Compute as follows.



              beginalign*
              varlimsup_k left|int_0^1 t^alpha (1 - t^2)^kmathrm d tright| &leqslant varlimsup_k left(int_0^c + int_c^1right)t^alpha (1 - t^2)^k mathrm dt quad [text the function geqslant 0, cin (0,1)] \
              &leqslant varlimsup_k int_0^c (1-t^2)^kmathrm dt + varlimsup_k int_c^1 (1- t^2)^k mathrm d t quad [t^alpha leqslant1]\
              &leqslant int_0^c mathrm dt + varlimsup_k int_c^1 (1-c^2)^k mathrm dt quad [1 geqslant 1 -t^2 searrow 0]\
              &=c + varlimsup_k(1-c)(1 -c^2)^k\
              &= c + 0 quad[1-c^2<1, (1-c^2)^k to 0 text as k to infty]\
              &= c to 0 quad [c to 0^+]. blacktriangleright
              endalign*






              share|cite|improve this answer



























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                Another way via Beta and Gamma functions $$int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt= int_0^1 t^alpha/2+1/2-1(1-t)^k+1-1dt \=B(alpha/2+1/2,k+1)=fracGamma(alpha/2+1/2)Gamma(k+1)Gamma(alpha/2+k+3/2)to 0$$






                share|cite|improve this answer




















                  Your Answer




                  StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
                  return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
                  StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
                  StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                  );
                  );
                  , "mathjax-editing");

                  StackExchange.ready(function()
                  var channelOptions =
                  tags: "".split(" "),
                  id: "69"
                  ;
                  initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                  StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                  // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                  if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                  StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                  createEditor();
                  );

                  else
                  createEditor();

                  );

                  function createEditor()
                  StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                  heartbeatType: 'answer',
                  convertImagesToLinks: true,
                  noModals: false,
                  showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                  reputationToPostImages: 10,
                  bindNavPrevention: true,
                  postfix: "",
                  noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                  discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                  ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                  );



                  );













                   

                  draft saved


                  draft discarded


















                  StackExchange.ready(
                  function ()
                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2898104%2fwith-alpha0-showing-that-int-01-t-alpha1-t2kdt-goes-to-0-as-k-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                  );

                  Post as a guest






























                  4 Answers
                  4






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes








                  4 Answers
                  4






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  active

                  oldest

                  votes






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes








                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote



                  accepted










                  Your method seems fine to me.



                  Another way is as follow :



                  $$forall t in [0,1], 0 le t^alpha(1-t^2)^k le 1$$



                  But $1 in L^1([0,1])$. So by dominated convergence theorem :



                  $$lim_k to infty int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt=int_0^1 lim_k to infty t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt=int_0^10~dt=0$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer
























                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote



                    accepted










                    Your method seems fine to me.



                    Another way is as follow :



                    $$forall t in [0,1], 0 le t^alpha(1-t^2)^k le 1$$



                    But $1 in L^1([0,1])$. So by dominated convergence theorem :



                    $$lim_k to infty int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt=int_0^1 lim_k to infty t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt=int_0^10~dt=0$$






                    share|cite|improve this answer






















                      up vote
                      3
                      down vote



                      accepted







                      up vote
                      3
                      down vote



                      accepted






                      Your method seems fine to me.



                      Another way is as follow :



                      $$forall t in [0,1], 0 le t^alpha(1-t^2)^k le 1$$



                      But $1 in L^1([0,1])$. So by dominated convergence theorem :



                      $$lim_k to infty int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt=int_0^1 lim_k to infty t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt=int_0^10~dt=0$$






                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      Your method seems fine to me.



                      Another way is as follow :



                      $$forall t in [0,1], 0 le t^alpha(1-t^2)^k le 1$$



                      But $1 in L^1([0,1])$. So by dominated convergence theorem :



                      $$lim_k to infty int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt=int_0^1 lim_k to infty t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt=int_0^10~dt=0$$







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered Aug 29 at 8:38









                      nicomezi

                      3,6721819




                      3,6721819




















                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          I suppose your $alpha $ is positive. Your proof is correct. If you know measure theory you can get it immediately from DCT: the integrand tends to $0$ because $1-t^2<1$ and the integrand is dominated by $t^alpha$ which is integrable.






                          share|cite|improve this answer
























                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote













                            I suppose your $alpha $ is positive. Your proof is correct. If you know measure theory you can get it immediately from DCT: the integrand tends to $0$ because $1-t^2<1$ and the integrand is dominated by $t^alpha$ which is integrable.






                            share|cite|improve this answer






















                              up vote
                              1
                              down vote










                              up vote
                              1
                              down vote









                              I suppose your $alpha $ is positive. Your proof is correct. If you know measure theory you can get it immediately from DCT: the integrand tends to $0$ because $1-t^2<1$ and the integrand is dominated by $t^alpha$ which is integrable.






                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              I suppose your $alpha $ is positive. Your proof is correct. If you know measure theory you can get it immediately from DCT: the integrand tends to $0$ because $1-t^2<1$ and the integrand is dominated by $t^alpha$ which is integrable.







                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer










                              answered Aug 29 at 8:38









                              Kavi Rama Murthy

                              25k31234




                              25k31234




















                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote













                                  Alternative method.



                                  Solution. $blacktriangleleft$ Consider the upper limit. Compute as follows.



                                  beginalign*
                                  varlimsup_k left|int_0^1 t^alpha (1 - t^2)^kmathrm d tright| &leqslant varlimsup_k left(int_0^c + int_c^1right)t^alpha (1 - t^2)^k mathrm dt quad [text the function geqslant 0, cin (0,1)] \
                                  &leqslant varlimsup_k int_0^c (1-t^2)^kmathrm dt + varlimsup_k int_c^1 (1- t^2)^k mathrm d t quad [t^alpha leqslant1]\
                                  &leqslant int_0^c mathrm dt + varlimsup_k int_c^1 (1-c^2)^k mathrm dt quad [1 geqslant 1 -t^2 searrow 0]\
                                  &=c + varlimsup_k(1-c)(1 -c^2)^k\
                                  &= c + 0 quad[1-c^2<1, (1-c^2)^k to 0 text as k to infty]\
                                  &= c to 0 quad [c to 0^+]. blacktriangleright
                                  endalign*






                                  share|cite|improve this answer
























                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote













                                    Alternative method.



                                    Solution. $blacktriangleleft$ Consider the upper limit. Compute as follows.



                                    beginalign*
                                    varlimsup_k left|int_0^1 t^alpha (1 - t^2)^kmathrm d tright| &leqslant varlimsup_k left(int_0^c + int_c^1right)t^alpha (1 - t^2)^k mathrm dt quad [text the function geqslant 0, cin (0,1)] \
                                    &leqslant varlimsup_k int_0^c (1-t^2)^kmathrm dt + varlimsup_k int_c^1 (1- t^2)^k mathrm d t quad [t^alpha leqslant1]\
                                    &leqslant int_0^c mathrm dt + varlimsup_k int_c^1 (1-c^2)^k mathrm dt quad [1 geqslant 1 -t^2 searrow 0]\
                                    &=c + varlimsup_k(1-c)(1 -c^2)^k\
                                    &= c + 0 quad[1-c^2<1, (1-c^2)^k to 0 text as k to infty]\
                                    &= c to 0 quad [c to 0^+]. blacktriangleright
                                    endalign*






                                    share|cite|improve this answer






















                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote










                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote









                                      Alternative method.



                                      Solution. $blacktriangleleft$ Consider the upper limit. Compute as follows.



                                      beginalign*
                                      varlimsup_k left|int_0^1 t^alpha (1 - t^2)^kmathrm d tright| &leqslant varlimsup_k left(int_0^c + int_c^1right)t^alpha (1 - t^2)^k mathrm dt quad [text the function geqslant 0, cin (0,1)] \
                                      &leqslant varlimsup_k int_0^c (1-t^2)^kmathrm dt + varlimsup_k int_c^1 (1- t^2)^k mathrm d t quad [t^alpha leqslant1]\
                                      &leqslant int_0^c mathrm dt + varlimsup_k int_c^1 (1-c^2)^k mathrm dt quad [1 geqslant 1 -t^2 searrow 0]\
                                      &=c + varlimsup_k(1-c)(1 -c^2)^k\
                                      &= c + 0 quad[1-c^2<1, (1-c^2)^k to 0 text as k to infty]\
                                      &= c to 0 quad [c to 0^+]. blacktriangleright
                                      endalign*






                                      share|cite|improve this answer












                                      Alternative method.



                                      Solution. $blacktriangleleft$ Consider the upper limit. Compute as follows.



                                      beginalign*
                                      varlimsup_k left|int_0^1 t^alpha (1 - t^2)^kmathrm d tright| &leqslant varlimsup_k left(int_0^c + int_c^1right)t^alpha (1 - t^2)^k mathrm dt quad [text the function geqslant 0, cin (0,1)] \
                                      &leqslant varlimsup_k int_0^c (1-t^2)^kmathrm dt + varlimsup_k int_c^1 (1- t^2)^k mathrm d t quad [t^alpha leqslant1]\
                                      &leqslant int_0^c mathrm dt + varlimsup_k int_c^1 (1-c^2)^k mathrm dt quad [1 geqslant 1 -t^2 searrow 0]\
                                      &=c + varlimsup_k(1-c)(1 -c^2)^k\
                                      &= c + 0 quad[1-c^2<1, (1-c^2)^k to 0 text as k to infty]\
                                      &= c to 0 quad [c to 0^+]. blacktriangleright
                                      endalign*







                                      share|cite|improve this answer












                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                      share|cite|improve this answer










                                      answered Aug 29 at 9:12









                                      xbh

                                      3,242320




                                      3,242320




















                                          up vote
                                          0
                                          down vote













                                          Another way via Beta and Gamma functions $$int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt= int_0^1 t^alpha/2+1/2-1(1-t)^k+1-1dt \=B(alpha/2+1/2,k+1)=fracGamma(alpha/2+1/2)Gamma(k+1)Gamma(alpha/2+k+3/2)to 0$$






                                          share|cite|improve this answer
























                                            up vote
                                            0
                                            down vote













                                            Another way via Beta and Gamma functions $$int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt= int_0^1 t^alpha/2+1/2-1(1-t)^k+1-1dt \=B(alpha/2+1/2,k+1)=fracGamma(alpha/2+1/2)Gamma(k+1)Gamma(alpha/2+k+3/2)to 0$$






                                            share|cite|improve this answer






















                                              up vote
                                              0
                                              down vote










                                              up vote
                                              0
                                              down vote









                                              Another way via Beta and Gamma functions $$int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt= int_0^1 t^alpha/2+1/2-1(1-t)^k+1-1dt \=B(alpha/2+1/2,k+1)=fracGamma(alpha/2+1/2)Gamma(k+1)Gamma(alpha/2+k+3/2)to 0$$






                                              share|cite|improve this answer












                                              Another way via Beta and Gamma functions $$int_0^1 t^alpha(1-t^2)^kdt= int_0^1 t^alpha/2+1/2-1(1-t)^k+1-1dt \=B(alpha/2+1/2,k+1)=fracGamma(alpha/2+1/2)Gamma(k+1)Gamma(alpha/2+k+3/2)to 0$$







                                              share|cite|improve this answer












                                              share|cite|improve this answer



                                              share|cite|improve this answer










                                              answered Aug 29 at 9:22









                                              Guy Fsone

                                              16.9k42671




                                              16.9k42671



























                                                   

                                                  draft saved


                                                  draft discarded















































                                                   


                                                  draft saved


                                                  draft discarded














                                                  StackExchange.ready(
                                                  function ()
                                                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2898104%2fwith-alpha0-showing-that-int-01-t-alpha1-t2kdt-goes-to-0-as-k-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                                  );

                                                  Post as a guest













































































                                                  這個網誌中的熱門文章

                                                  How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                                                  Mutual Information Always Non-negative

                                                  Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?