Proving that this polynomial has no roots in this field

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Problem: Let $k$ be a field, and let $F = k(t)$ be the field of rational functions in $t$ with coefficients in $k$. Then consider $f(x) = x^p - t in F[x]$ where $p$ is prime. Prove that $f$ is irreducible over $F$.



Attempt: I know there exists a Lemma (David Cox, Galois Theory, page 86) that says:



Lemma: Let $F$ be a field and let $p$ be prime. then $f = x^p - a in F[x]$ is irreducible over $F$ if and only if $f$ has no roots in $F$.



Hence, by the above lemma, I wish to show that $f(x) = x^p - t in F[x]$ has no roots in $F$. How can I show this? A 'root' would be a rational function in $t$ with coefficients in $k$. Let this function be denoted by $g(t)$. Then this would have to satisfy $g(t)^p = t$ in order to be a root of $f$.



I'm not sure why this is not possible. Is it because $p > 1$ is prime?







share|cite|improve this question
























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    Problem: Let $k$ be a field, and let $F = k(t)$ be the field of rational functions in $t$ with coefficients in $k$. Then consider $f(x) = x^p - t in F[x]$ where $p$ is prime. Prove that $f$ is irreducible over $F$.



    Attempt: I know there exists a Lemma (David Cox, Galois Theory, page 86) that says:



    Lemma: Let $F$ be a field and let $p$ be prime. then $f = x^p - a in F[x]$ is irreducible over $F$ if and only if $f$ has no roots in $F$.



    Hence, by the above lemma, I wish to show that $f(x) = x^p - t in F[x]$ has no roots in $F$. How can I show this? A 'root' would be a rational function in $t$ with coefficients in $k$. Let this function be denoted by $g(t)$. Then this would have to satisfy $g(t)^p = t$ in order to be a root of $f$.



    I'm not sure why this is not possible. Is it because $p > 1$ is prime?







    share|cite|improve this question






















      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      Problem: Let $k$ be a field, and let $F = k(t)$ be the field of rational functions in $t$ with coefficients in $k$. Then consider $f(x) = x^p - t in F[x]$ where $p$ is prime. Prove that $f$ is irreducible over $F$.



      Attempt: I know there exists a Lemma (David Cox, Galois Theory, page 86) that says:



      Lemma: Let $F$ be a field and let $p$ be prime. then $f = x^p - a in F[x]$ is irreducible over $F$ if and only if $f$ has no roots in $F$.



      Hence, by the above lemma, I wish to show that $f(x) = x^p - t in F[x]$ has no roots in $F$. How can I show this? A 'root' would be a rational function in $t$ with coefficients in $k$. Let this function be denoted by $g(t)$. Then this would have to satisfy $g(t)^p = t$ in order to be a root of $f$.



      I'm not sure why this is not possible. Is it because $p > 1$ is prime?







      share|cite|improve this question












      Problem: Let $k$ be a field, and let $F = k(t)$ be the field of rational functions in $t$ with coefficients in $k$. Then consider $f(x) = x^p - t in F[x]$ where $p$ is prime. Prove that $f$ is irreducible over $F$.



      Attempt: I know there exists a Lemma (David Cox, Galois Theory, page 86) that says:



      Lemma: Let $F$ be a field and let $p$ be prime. then $f = x^p - a in F[x]$ is irreducible over $F$ if and only if $f$ has no roots in $F$.



      Hence, by the above lemma, I wish to show that $f(x) = x^p - t in F[x]$ has no roots in $F$. How can I show this? A 'root' would be a rational function in $t$ with coefficients in $k$. Let this function be denoted by $g(t)$. Then this would have to satisfy $g(t)^p = t$ in order to be a root of $f$.



      I'm not sure why this is not possible. Is it because $p > 1$ is prime?









      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Aug 29 at 10:13









      Kamil

      1,90921237




      1,90921237




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted










          As you've noticed the supposed root has to be a rational function, so we get that:



          $$g(t) = fracf(t)h(t) quad textfor some f,h in k[t]$$



          Note that $f,h$ above are polynomials in the ring of polynomials of $k$.



          The plugging it in the equation we get:



          $$left(fracf(t)h(t)right)^p - t = 0 iff f(t)^p = th(t)^p$$



          Now just compare the degrees of the polynomials. If $deg f = n$ and $deg h = m$, then we get that the LHS has degree $pn$, while the RHS has degree $pm + 1$. It's obvious this two can't be equal. Thus we obtain a contradiction.



          Hence the proof.






          share|cite|improve this answer



























            up vote
            4
            down vote













            I wouldn’t bother with the Lemma you quoted.



            The field $F$ is the fraction field of the Unique Factorization Domain $k[t]$, in which $t$ is an indecomposable element. Your polynomial is $k[t]$-irreducible by Eisenstein. So it’s $k(t)$-irreducible, by Gauss.






            share|cite|improve this answer




















              Your Answer




              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: false,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2898195%2fproving-that-this-polynomial-has-no-roots-in-this-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest






























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              4
              down vote



              accepted










              As you've noticed the supposed root has to be a rational function, so we get that:



              $$g(t) = fracf(t)h(t) quad textfor some f,h in k[t]$$



              Note that $f,h$ above are polynomials in the ring of polynomials of $k$.



              The plugging it in the equation we get:



              $$left(fracf(t)h(t)right)^p - t = 0 iff f(t)^p = th(t)^p$$



              Now just compare the degrees of the polynomials. If $deg f = n$ and $deg h = m$, then we get that the LHS has degree $pn$, while the RHS has degree $pm + 1$. It's obvious this two can't be equal. Thus we obtain a contradiction.



              Hence the proof.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                4
                down vote



                accepted










                As you've noticed the supposed root has to be a rational function, so we get that:



                $$g(t) = fracf(t)h(t) quad textfor some f,h in k[t]$$



                Note that $f,h$ above are polynomials in the ring of polynomials of $k$.



                The plugging it in the equation we get:



                $$left(fracf(t)h(t)right)^p - t = 0 iff f(t)^p = th(t)^p$$



                Now just compare the degrees of the polynomials. If $deg f = n$ and $deg h = m$, then we get that the LHS has degree $pn$, while the RHS has degree $pm + 1$. It's obvious this two can't be equal. Thus we obtain a contradiction.



                Hence the proof.






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote



                  accepted







                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote



                  accepted






                  As you've noticed the supposed root has to be a rational function, so we get that:



                  $$g(t) = fracf(t)h(t) quad textfor some f,h in k[t]$$



                  Note that $f,h$ above are polynomials in the ring of polynomials of $k$.



                  The plugging it in the equation we get:



                  $$left(fracf(t)h(t)right)^p - t = 0 iff f(t)^p = th(t)^p$$



                  Now just compare the degrees of the polynomials. If $deg f = n$ and $deg h = m$, then we get that the LHS has degree $pn$, while the RHS has degree $pm + 1$. It's obvious this two can't be equal. Thus we obtain a contradiction.



                  Hence the proof.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  As you've noticed the supposed root has to be a rational function, so we get that:



                  $$g(t) = fracf(t)h(t) quad textfor some f,h in k[t]$$



                  Note that $f,h$ above are polynomials in the ring of polynomials of $k$.



                  The plugging it in the equation we get:



                  $$left(fracf(t)h(t)right)^p - t = 0 iff f(t)^p = th(t)^p$$



                  Now just compare the degrees of the polynomials. If $deg f = n$ and $deg h = m$, then we get that the LHS has degree $pn$, while the RHS has degree $pm + 1$. It's obvious this two can't be equal. Thus we obtain a contradiction.



                  Hence the proof.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Aug 29 at 10:52









                  Stefan4024

                  29.7k53377




                  29.7k53377




















                      up vote
                      4
                      down vote













                      I wouldn’t bother with the Lemma you quoted.



                      The field $F$ is the fraction field of the Unique Factorization Domain $k[t]$, in which $t$ is an indecomposable element. Your polynomial is $k[t]$-irreducible by Eisenstein. So it’s $k(t)$-irreducible, by Gauss.






                      share|cite|improve this answer
























                        up vote
                        4
                        down vote













                        I wouldn’t bother with the Lemma you quoted.



                        The field $F$ is the fraction field of the Unique Factorization Domain $k[t]$, in which $t$ is an indecomposable element. Your polynomial is $k[t]$-irreducible by Eisenstein. So it’s $k(t)$-irreducible, by Gauss.






                        share|cite|improve this answer






















                          up vote
                          4
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          4
                          down vote









                          I wouldn’t bother with the Lemma you quoted.



                          The field $F$ is the fraction field of the Unique Factorization Domain $k[t]$, in which $t$ is an indecomposable element. Your polynomial is $k[t]$-irreducible by Eisenstein. So it’s $k(t)$-irreducible, by Gauss.






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          I wouldn’t bother with the Lemma you quoted.



                          The field $F$ is the fraction field of the Unique Factorization Domain $k[t]$, in which $t$ is an indecomposable element. Your polynomial is $k[t]$-irreducible by Eisenstein. So it’s $k(t)$-irreducible, by Gauss.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Aug 29 at 19:12









                          Lubin

                          41.5k34284




                          41.5k34284



























                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded















































                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2898195%2fproving-that-this-polynomial-has-no-roots-in-this-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest













































































                              這個網誌中的熱門文章

                              How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                              Mutual Information Always Non-negative

                              Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?