Show that $lim_x to infty int_0 ^x cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$ exists

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have a tricky comprehensive exam problem that I've been wrestling with: it is exactly the problem in the title reproduced here:




Show that
$$lim_x to infty int_0 ^x cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$$
exists.




If we plot the function $f(t) = cos (t^3 + t)$ then it's "obvious" by inspection that the given limit exists: the periods for cosine are decreasing to zero. Even so, I don't really see an obvious candidate for what the limit might be (I believe it is positive.)



My first step was to write down just exactly what it means that the limit exists. The limit exists if there exists some number $L < infty$ with the following property: for any $varepsilon >0$ there exists some $y >0$ such that



$$
x >y implies left| int_0 ^x cos (t^3 + t) ,dt - L right| < varepsilon
$$



This is fine and good, but I immediately run in to the issue of not having a limit candidate $L$.



There's a problem in (baby) Rudin (Ch 6 Exc 13) which looks quite similar (in fact it was also given as a past comprehensive exam question) which is (in effect):




Show that
$$
lim_x to infty int_0 ^x sin (t^2) ,dt
$$
exists.




I'll note that Rudin walks through the solution to the above in 4 or 5 steps no one of which is obvious or trivial (at least not to me)...



Thus my question: is there some easy (read: easy enough that it would be reasonable to expect the problem to be solved in a comprehensive exam setting) way to solve one or both of these problems?







share|cite|improve this question




















  • Hint : Integration by parts.
    – Pjonin
    Aug 8 at 16:14










  • How do you know $int_0^inftysin(t^2)~dt$ exists? Have you noticed any particular step from there may also be applicable here?
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Aug 8 at 16:25














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have a tricky comprehensive exam problem that I've been wrestling with: it is exactly the problem in the title reproduced here:




Show that
$$lim_x to infty int_0 ^x cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$$
exists.




If we plot the function $f(t) = cos (t^3 + t)$ then it's "obvious" by inspection that the given limit exists: the periods for cosine are decreasing to zero. Even so, I don't really see an obvious candidate for what the limit might be (I believe it is positive.)



My first step was to write down just exactly what it means that the limit exists. The limit exists if there exists some number $L < infty$ with the following property: for any $varepsilon >0$ there exists some $y >0$ such that



$$
x >y implies left| int_0 ^x cos (t^3 + t) ,dt - L right| < varepsilon
$$



This is fine and good, but I immediately run in to the issue of not having a limit candidate $L$.



There's a problem in (baby) Rudin (Ch 6 Exc 13) which looks quite similar (in fact it was also given as a past comprehensive exam question) which is (in effect):




Show that
$$
lim_x to infty int_0 ^x sin (t^2) ,dt
$$
exists.




I'll note that Rudin walks through the solution to the above in 4 or 5 steps no one of which is obvious or trivial (at least not to me)...



Thus my question: is there some easy (read: easy enough that it would be reasonable to expect the problem to be solved in a comprehensive exam setting) way to solve one or both of these problems?







share|cite|improve this question




















  • Hint : Integration by parts.
    – Pjonin
    Aug 8 at 16:14










  • How do you know $int_0^inftysin(t^2)~dt$ exists? Have you noticed any particular step from there may also be applicable here?
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Aug 8 at 16:25












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I have a tricky comprehensive exam problem that I've been wrestling with: it is exactly the problem in the title reproduced here:




Show that
$$lim_x to infty int_0 ^x cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$$
exists.




If we plot the function $f(t) = cos (t^3 + t)$ then it's "obvious" by inspection that the given limit exists: the periods for cosine are decreasing to zero. Even so, I don't really see an obvious candidate for what the limit might be (I believe it is positive.)



My first step was to write down just exactly what it means that the limit exists. The limit exists if there exists some number $L < infty$ with the following property: for any $varepsilon >0$ there exists some $y >0$ such that



$$
x >y implies left| int_0 ^x cos (t^3 + t) ,dt - L right| < varepsilon
$$



This is fine and good, but I immediately run in to the issue of not having a limit candidate $L$.



There's a problem in (baby) Rudin (Ch 6 Exc 13) which looks quite similar (in fact it was also given as a past comprehensive exam question) which is (in effect):




Show that
$$
lim_x to infty int_0 ^x sin (t^2) ,dt
$$
exists.




I'll note that Rudin walks through the solution to the above in 4 or 5 steps no one of which is obvious or trivial (at least not to me)...



Thus my question: is there some easy (read: easy enough that it would be reasonable to expect the problem to be solved in a comprehensive exam setting) way to solve one or both of these problems?







share|cite|improve this question












I have a tricky comprehensive exam problem that I've been wrestling with: it is exactly the problem in the title reproduced here:




Show that
$$lim_x to infty int_0 ^x cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$$
exists.




If we plot the function $f(t) = cos (t^3 + t)$ then it's "obvious" by inspection that the given limit exists: the periods for cosine are decreasing to zero. Even so, I don't really see an obvious candidate for what the limit might be (I believe it is positive.)



My first step was to write down just exactly what it means that the limit exists. The limit exists if there exists some number $L < infty$ with the following property: for any $varepsilon >0$ there exists some $y >0$ such that



$$
x >y implies left| int_0 ^x cos (t^3 + t) ,dt - L right| < varepsilon
$$



This is fine and good, but I immediately run in to the issue of not having a limit candidate $L$.



There's a problem in (baby) Rudin (Ch 6 Exc 13) which looks quite similar (in fact it was also given as a past comprehensive exam question) which is (in effect):




Show that
$$
lim_x to infty int_0 ^x sin (t^2) ,dt
$$
exists.




I'll note that Rudin walks through the solution to the above in 4 or 5 steps no one of which is obvious or trivial (at least not to me)...



Thus my question: is there some easy (read: easy enough that it would be reasonable to expect the problem to be solved in a comprehensive exam setting) way to solve one or both of these problems?









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 8 at 16:11









aherring

21917




21917











  • Hint : Integration by parts.
    – Pjonin
    Aug 8 at 16:14










  • How do you know $int_0^inftysin(t^2)~dt$ exists? Have you noticed any particular step from there may also be applicable here?
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Aug 8 at 16:25
















  • Hint : Integration by parts.
    – Pjonin
    Aug 8 at 16:14










  • How do you know $int_0^inftysin(t^2)~dt$ exists? Have you noticed any particular step from there may also be applicable here?
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Aug 8 at 16:25















Hint : Integration by parts.
– Pjonin
Aug 8 at 16:14




Hint : Integration by parts.
– Pjonin
Aug 8 at 16:14












How do you know $int_0^inftysin(t^2)~dt$ exists? Have you noticed any particular step from there may also be applicable here?
– Simply Beautiful Art
Aug 8 at 16:25




How do you know $int_0^inftysin(t^2)~dt$ exists? Have you noticed any particular step from there may also be applicable here?
– Simply Beautiful Art
Aug 8 at 16:25










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










By Dirichlet's test, if $f(x)$ is differentiable, bounded and decreasing to $0$ on $mathbbR^+$, then the limit
$$ lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mcos(x)f(x),dx $$
is finite. Now $g(t)=t+t^3$ is increasing, differentiable and unbounded on $mathbbR^+$, together with its inverse function $h(t)$. In a right neighbourhood of the origin $h(t)sim t$, while in a left neighbourhood of $+infty$ we have $h(t)simsqrt[3]t$. By enforcing the substitution $t=h(x)$ we have



$$ int_0^Mcos(t+t^3),dt = int_0^g(M)cos(x) h'(x),dx $$
and we may apply the previous lemma since $h$ is concave on $(1,+infty)$.




With minor adjustements this approach proves the following useful Lemma:




If $f(x)/x$ is a differentiable, increasing and unbounded function on
$mathbbR^+$, the limit $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mexpleft(i
f(x)right),dx$ is finite.





About Fresnel's integral,
$$ int_0^Msin(x^2),dx = int_0^M^2fracsin(x)2sqrtx,dxstackreltextIBP=left[frac1-cos x2sqrtxright]_0^M^2+int_0^M^2frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx $$
where the first term of the RHS tends to zero as $Mto +infty$. The last integral is the integral of a positive function, where
$$ int_0^1frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx leq int_0^1fracfracx^224xsqrtx,dx=frac112 $$
and for any $Mgeq 1$
$$ int_1^M^2frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx leq int_1^M^2frac24xsqrtx,dx leq int_1^+inftyfracdx2xsqrtx = 1 $$
so the limit $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Msin(x^2),dx$ is positive, finite and less than $frac1312$. Its actual value is $frac12sqrtfracpi2$, as can be shown through the (inverse) Laplace transform or contour integration.




The actual value of $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mcos(t+t^3),dt$ is related to Airy's differential equation $f''(x)=xcdot f(x)$ and it is given by
$$ fracpisqrt[3]3,textAileft(frac1sqrt[3]3right)=frac13sum_k=0^infty 1over k!Gammaleft(k+1over 3right)sinleft(2pi (k+1)over 3right)approx sqrt2-1.$$






share|cite|improve this answer





























    up vote
    3
    down vote













    Hint.



    $$
    t^3+t = fracpi2+kpi
    $$



    always have a real root $t_k$ for each $k$ So the integral can be considered as



    $$
    sum_k = 0^nint_t_k^t_k+1cos(t^3-t)dt
    $$



    which is an alternating series and also $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$



    so for $t > 1$



    $$
    int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt
    $$



    giving an alternate series absolutely convergent.






    share|cite|improve this answer




















    • Do you perhaps mean to have $cos (t^3 + t)$ in each of the three displayed integrals or am I missing something major? Also I suppose that the displayed series should have upper limit $infty$.
      – aherring
      Aug 8 at 17:29










    • Also I believe that in order to get a faithful representation of the integral as the suggested alternating series we need some term like $int_0 ^t_0 cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$. Indeed $t_0$ is the value where $t^3 + t = pi / 2$ and thus the first place where $cos (t^3 - t) = 0$: the original integral starts with cosine at the top of its amplitude where $cos (0) = 1$. I don't think this affects the veracity of the rest of the argument however...
      – aherring
      Aug 8 at 17:40











    • Aslo I'm pretty sure that you mean to write $t_k+1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ instead of $t_k-1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$. Your statement is true (and trivial since $t_k-1-t_k = -(t_k - t_k-1)$ and $t_k - t_k-1 >0$), but not especially useful.
      – aherring
      Aug 8 at 19:27










    • @aherring As I titled my answer by Hint., my intention was to furnish some ideas to handle, obtaining a reasonable result. First note the ... so for $t > 1$ second, note that $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ is a consequence of the strict super linear increasing of $t^2-t$ for $t > 1$. This helps in the determination of $int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt$ Finally, a hint is a hint. Anyway, thanks for your explanations.
      – Cesareo
      Aug 8 at 20:49










    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2876273%2fshow-that-lim-x-to-infty-int-0-x-cos-t3-t-dt-exists%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    4
    down vote



    accepted










    By Dirichlet's test, if $f(x)$ is differentiable, bounded and decreasing to $0$ on $mathbbR^+$, then the limit
    $$ lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mcos(x)f(x),dx $$
    is finite. Now $g(t)=t+t^3$ is increasing, differentiable and unbounded on $mathbbR^+$, together with its inverse function $h(t)$. In a right neighbourhood of the origin $h(t)sim t$, while in a left neighbourhood of $+infty$ we have $h(t)simsqrt[3]t$. By enforcing the substitution $t=h(x)$ we have



    $$ int_0^Mcos(t+t^3),dt = int_0^g(M)cos(x) h'(x),dx $$
    and we may apply the previous lemma since $h$ is concave on $(1,+infty)$.




    With minor adjustements this approach proves the following useful Lemma:




    If $f(x)/x$ is a differentiable, increasing and unbounded function on
    $mathbbR^+$, the limit $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mexpleft(i
    f(x)right),dx$ is finite.





    About Fresnel's integral,
    $$ int_0^Msin(x^2),dx = int_0^M^2fracsin(x)2sqrtx,dxstackreltextIBP=left[frac1-cos x2sqrtxright]_0^M^2+int_0^M^2frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx $$
    where the first term of the RHS tends to zero as $Mto +infty$. The last integral is the integral of a positive function, where
    $$ int_0^1frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx leq int_0^1fracfracx^224xsqrtx,dx=frac112 $$
    and for any $Mgeq 1$
    $$ int_1^M^2frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx leq int_1^M^2frac24xsqrtx,dx leq int_1^+inftyfracdx2xsqrtx = 1 $$
    so the limit $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Msin(x^2),dx$ is positive, finite and less than $frac1312$. Its actual value is $frac12sqrtfracpi2$, as can be shown through the (inverse) Laplace transform or contour integration.




    The actual value of $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mcos(t+t^3),dt$ is related to Airy's differential equation $f''(x)=xcdot f(x)$ and it is given by
    $$ fracpisqrt[3]3,textAileft(frac1sqrt[3]3right)=frac13sum_k=0^infty 1over k!Gammaleft(k+1over 3right)sinleft(2pi (k+1)over 3right)approx sqrt2-1.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      up vote
      4
      down vote



      accepted










      By Dirichlet's test, if $f(x)$ is differentiable, bounded and decreasing to $0$ on $mathbbR^+$, then the limit
      $$ lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mcos(x)f(x),dx $$
      is finite. Now $g(t)=t+t^3$ is increasing, differentiable and unbounded on $mathbbR^+$, together with its inverse function $h(t)$. In a right neighbourhood of the origin $h(t)sim t$, while in a left neighbourhood of $+infty$ we have $h(t)simsqrt[3]t$. By enforcing the substitution $t=h(x)$ we have



      $$ int_0^Mcos(t+t^3),dt = int_0^g(M)cos(x) h'(x),dx $$
      and we may apply the previous lemma since $h$ is concave on $(1,+infty)$.




      With minor adjustements this approach proves the following useful Lemma:




      If $f(x)/x$ is a differentiable, increasing and unbounded function on
      $mathbbR^+$, the limit $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mexpleft(i
      f(x)right),dx$ is finite.





      About Fresnel's integral,
      $$ int_0^Msin(x^2),dx = int_0^M^2fracsin(x)2sqrtx,dxstackreltextIBP=left[frac1-cos x2sqrtxright]_0^M^2+int_0^M^2frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx $$
      where the first term of the RHS tends to zero as $Mto +infty$. The last integral is the integral of a positive function, where
      $$ int_0^1frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx leq int_0^1fracfracx^224xsqrtx,dx=frac112 $$
      and for any $Mgeq 1$
      $$ int_1^M^2frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx leq int_1^M^2frac24xsqrtx,dx leq int_1^+inftyfracdx2xsqrtx = 1 $$
      so the limit $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Msin(x^2),dx$ is positive, finite and less than $frac1312$. Its actual value is $frac12sqrtfracpi2$, as can be shown through the (inverse) Laplace transform or contour integration.




      The actual value of $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mcos(t+t^3),dt$ is related to Airy's differential equation $f''(x)=xcdot f(x)$ and it is given by
      $$ fracpisqrt[3]3,textAileft(frac1sqrt[3]3right)=frac13sum_k=0^infty 1over k!Gammaleft(k+1over 3right)sinleft(2pi (k+1)over 3right)approx sqrt2-1.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted






        By Dirichlet's test, if $f(x)$ is differentiable, bounded and decreasing to $0$ on $mathbbR^+$, then the limit
        $$ lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mcos(x)f(x),dx $$
        is finite. Now $g(t)=t+t^3$ is increasing, differentiable and unbounded on $mathbbR^+$, together with its inverse function $h(t)$. In a right neighbourhood of the origin $h(t)sim t$, while in a left neighbourhood of $+infty$ we have $h(t)simsqrt[3]t$. By enforcing the substitution $t=h(x)$ we have



        $$ int_0^Mcos(t+t^3),dt = int_0^g(M)cos(x) h'(x),dx $$
        and we may apply the previous lemma since $h$ is concave on $(1,+infty)$.




        With minor adjustements this approach proves the following useful Lemma:




        If $f(x)/x$ is a differentiable, increasing and unbounded function on
        $mathbbR^+$, the limit $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mexpleft(i
        f(x)right),dx$ is finite.





        About Fresnel's integral,
        $$ int_0^Msin(x^2),dx = int_0^M^2fracsin(x)2sqrtx,dxstackreltextIBP=left[frac1-cos x2sqrtxright]_0^M^2+int_0^M^2frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx $$
        where the first term of the RHS tends to zero as $Mto +infty$. The last integral is the integral of a positive function, where
        $$ int_0^1frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx leq int_0^1fracfracx^224xsqrtx,dx=frac112 $$
        and for any $Mgeq 1$
        $$ int_1^M^2frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx leq int_1^M^2frac24xsqrtx,dx leq int_1^+inftyfracdx2xsqrtx = 1 $$
        so the limit $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Msin(x^2),dx$ is positive, finite and less than $frac1312$. Its actual value is $frac12sqrtfracpi2$, as can be shown through the (inverse) Laplace transform or contour integration.




        The actual value of $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mcos(t+t^3),dt$ is related to Airy's differential equation $f''(x)=xcdot f(x)$ and it is given by
        $$ fracpisqrt[3]3,textAileft(frac1sqrt[3]3right)=frac13sum_k=0^infty 1over k!Gammaleft(k+1over 3right)sinleft(2pi (k+1)over 3right)approx sqrt2-1.$$






        share|cite|improve this answer














        By Dirichlet's test, if $f(x)$ is differentiable, bounded and decreasing to $0$ on $mathbbR^+$, then the limit
        $$ lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mcos(x)f(x),dx $$
        is finite. Now $g(t)=t+t^3$ is increasing, differentiable and unbounded on $mathbbR^+$, together with its inverse function $h(t)$. In a right neighbourhood of the origin $h(t)sim t$, while in a left neighbourhood of $+infty$ we have $h(t)simsqrt[3]t$. By enforcing the substitution $t=h(x)$ we have



        $$ int_0^Mcos(t+t^3),dt = int_0^g(M)cos(x) h'(x),dx $$
        and we may apply the previous lemma since $h$ is concave on $(1,+infty)$.




        With minor adjustements this approach proves the following useful Lemma:




        If $f(x)/x$ is a differentiable, increasing and unbounded function on
        $mathbbR^+$, the limit $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mexpleft(i
        f(x)right),dx$ is finite.





        About Fresnel's integral,
        $$ int_0^Msin(x^2),dx = int_0^M^2fracsin(x)2sqrtx,dxstackreltextIBP=left[frac1-cos x2sqrtxright]_0^M^2+int_0^M^2frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx $$
        where the first term of the RHS tends to zero as $Mto +infty$. The last integral is the integral of a positive function, where
        $$ int_0^1frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx leq int_0^1fracfracx^224xsqrtx,dx=frac112 $$
        and for any $Mgeq 1$
        $$ int_1^M^2frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx leq int_1^M^2frac24xsqrtx,dx leq int_1^+inftyfracdx2xsqrtx = 1 $$
        so the limit $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Msin(x^2),dx$ is positive, finite and less than $frac1312$. Its actual value is $frac12sqrtfracpi2$, as can be shown through the (inverse) Laplace transform or contour integration.




        The actual value of $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mcos(t+t^3),dt$ is related to Airy's differential equation $f''(x)=xcdot f(x)$ and it is given by
        $$ fracpisqrt[3]3,textAileft(frac1sqrt[3]3right)=frac13sum_k=0^infty 1over k!Gammaleft(k+1over 3right)sinleft(2pi (k+1)over 3right)approx sqrt2-1.$$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Aug 8 at 18:01

























        answered Aug 8 at 17:07









        Jack D'Aurizio♦

        271k31266630




        271k31266630




















            up vote
            3
            down vote













            Hint.



            $$
            t^3+t = fracpi2+kpi
            $$



            always have a real root $t_k$ for each $k$ So the integral can be considered as



            $$
            sum_k = 0^nint_t_k^t_k+1cos(t^3-t)dt
            $$



            which is an alternating series and also $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$



            so for $t > 1$



            $$
            int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt
            $$



            giving an alternate series absolutely convergent.






            share|cite|improve this answer




















            • Do you perhaps mean to have $cos (t^3 + t)$ in each of the three displayed integrals or am I missing something major? Also I suppose that the displayed series should have upper limit $infty$.
              – aherring
              Aug 8 at 17:29










            • Also I believe that in order to get a faithful representation of the integral as the suggested alternating series we need some term like $int_0 ^t_0 cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$. Indeed $t_0$ is the value where $t^3 + t = pi / 2$ and thus the first place where $cos (t^3 - t) = 0$: the original integral starts with cosine at the top of its amplitude where $cos (0) = 1$. I don't think this affects the veracity of the rest of the argument however...
              – aherring
              Aug 8 at 17:40











            • Aslo I'm pretty sure that you mean to write $t_k+1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ instead of $t_k-1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$. Your statement is true (and trivial since $t_k-1-t_k = -(t_k - t_k-1)$ and $t_k - t_k-1 >0$), but not especially useful.
              – aherring
              Aug 8 at 19:27










            • @aherring As I titled my answer by Hint., my intention was to furnish some ideas to handle, obtaining a reasonable result. First note the ... so for $t > 1$ second, note that $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ is a consequence of the strict super linear increasing of $t^2-t$ for $t > 1$. This helps in the determination of $int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt$ Finally, a hint is a hint. Anyway, thanks for your explanations.
              – Cesareo
              Aug 8 at 20:49














            up vote
            3
            down vote













            Hint.



            $$
            t^3+t = fracpi2+kpi
            $$



            always have a real root $t_k$ for each $k$ So the integral can be considered as



            $$
            sum_k = 0^nint_t_k^t_k+1cos(t^3-t)dt
            $$



            which is an alternating series and also $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$



            so for $t > 1$



            $$
            int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt
            $$



            giving an alternate series absolutely convergent.






            share|cite|improve this answer




















            • Do you perhaps mean to have $cos (t^3 + t)$ in each of the three displayed integrals or am I missing something major? Also I suppose that the displayed series should have upper limit $infty$.
              – aherring
              Aug 8 at 17:29










            • Also I believe that in order to get a faithful representation of the integral as the suggested alternating series we need some term like $int_0 ^t_0 cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$. Indeed $t_0$ is the value where $t^3 + t = pi / 2$ and thus the first place where $cos (t^3 - t) = 0$: the original integral starts with cosine at the top of its amplitude where $cos (0) = 1$. I don't think this affects the veracity of the rest of the argument however...
              – aherring
              Aug 8 at 17:40











            • Aslo I'm pretty sure that you mean to write $t_k+1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ instead of $t_k-1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$. Your statement is true (and trivial since $t_k-1-t_k = -(t_k - t_k-1)$ and $t_k - t_k-1 >0$), but not especially useful.
              – aherring
              Aug 8 at 19:27










            • @aherring As I titled my answer by Hint., my intention was to furnish some ideas to handle, obtaining a reasonable result. First note the ... so for $t > 1$ second, note that $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ is a consequence of the strict super linear increasing of $t^2-t$ for $t > 1$. This helps in the determination of $int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt$ Finally, a hint is a hint. Anyway, thanks for your explanations.
              – Cesareo
              Aug 8 at 20:49












            up vote
            3
            down vote










            up vote
            3
            down vote









            Hint.



            $$
            t^3+t = fracpi2+kpi
            $$



            always have a real root $t_k$ for each $k$ So the integral can be considered as



            $$
            sum_k = 0^nint_t_k^t_k+1cos(t^3-t)dt
            $$



            which is an alternating series and also $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$



            so for $t > 1$



            $$
            int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt
            $$



            giving an alternate series absolutely convergent.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            Hint.



            $$
            t^3+t = fracpi2+kpi
            $$



            always have a real root $t_k$ for each $k$ So the integral can be considered as



            $$
            sum_k = 0^nint_t_k^t_k+1cos(t^3-t)dt
            $$



            which is an alternating series and also $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$



            so for $t > 1$



            $$
            int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt
            $$



            giving an alternate series absolutely convergent.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Aug 8 at 16:35









            Cesareo

            5,8572412




            5,8572412











            • Do you perhaps mean to have $cos (t^3 + t)$ in each of the three displayed integrals or am I missing something major? Also I suppose that the displayed series should have upper limit $infty$.
              – aherring
              Aug 8 at 17:29










            • Also I believe that in order to get a faithful representation of the integral as the suggested alternating series we need some term like $int_0 ^t_0 cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$. Indeed $t_0$ is the value where $t^3 + t = pi / 2$ and thus the first place where $cos (t^3 - t) = 0$: the original integral starts with cosine at the top of its amplitude where $cos (0) = 1$. I don't think this affects the veracity of the rest of the argument however...
              – aherring
              Aug 8 at 17:40











            • Aslo I'm pretty sure that you mean to write $t_k+1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ instead of $t_k-1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$. Your statement is true (and trivial since $t_k-1-t_k = -(t_k - t_k-1)$ and $t_k - t_k-1 >0$), but not especially useful.
              – aherring
              Aug 8 at 19:27










            • @aherring As I titled my answer by Hint., my intention was to furnish some ideas to handle, obtaining a reasonable result. First note the ... so for $t > 1$ second, note that $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ is a consequence of the strict super linear increasing of $t^2-t$ for $t > 1$. This helps in the determination of $int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt$ Finally, a hint is a hint. Anyway, thanks for your explanations.
              – Cesareo
              Aug 8 at 20:49
















            • Do you perhaps mean to have $cos (t^3 + t)$ in each of the three displayed integrals or am I missing something major? Also I suppose that the displayed series should have upper limit $infty$.
              – aherring
              Aug 8 at 17:29










            • Also I believe that in order to get a faithful representation of the integral as the suggested alternating series we need some term like $int_0 ^t_0 cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$. Indeed $t_0$ is the value where $t^3 + t = pi / 2$ and thus the first place where $cos (t^3 - t) = 0$: the original integral starts with cosine at the top of its amplitude where $cos (0) = 1$. I don't think this affects the veracity of the rest of the argument however...
              – aherring
              Aug 8 at 17:40











            • Aslo I'm pretty sure that you mean to write $t_k+1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ instead of $t_k-1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$. Your statement is true (and trivial since $t_k-1-t_k = -(t_k - t_k-1)$ and $t_k - t_k-1 >0$), but not especially useful.
              – aherring
              Aug 8 at 19:27










            • @aherring As I titled my answer by Hint., my intention was to furnish some ideas to handle, obtaining a reasonable result. First note the ... so for $t > 1$ second, note that $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ is a consequence of the strict super linear increasing of $t^2-t$ for $t > 1$. This helps in the determination of $int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt$ Finally, a hint is a hint. Anyway, thanks for your explanations.
              – Cesareo
              Aug 8 at 20:49















            Do you perhaps mean to have $cos (t^3 + t)$ in each of the three displayed integrals or am I missing something major? Also I suppose that the displayed series should have upper limit $infty$.
            – aherring
            Aug 8 at 17:29




            Do you perhaps mean to have $cos (t^3 + t)$ in each of the three displayed integrals or am I missing something major? Also I suppose that the displayed series should have upper limit $infty$.
            – aherring
            Aug 8 at 17:29












            Also I believe that in order to get a faithful representation of the integral as the suggested alternating series we need some term like $int_0 ^t_0 cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$. Indeed $t_0$ is the value where $t^3 + t = pi / 2$ and thus the first place where $cos (t^3 - t) = 0$: the original integral starts with cosine at the top of its amplitude where $cos (0) = 1$. I don't think this affects the veracity of the rest of the argument however...
            – aherring
            Aug 8 at 17:40





            Also I believe that in order to get a faithful representation of the integral as the suggested alternating series we need some term like $int_0 ^t_0 cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$. Indeed $t_0$ is the value where $t^3 + t = pi / 2$ and thus the first place where $cos (t^3 - t) = 0$: the original integral starts with cosine at the top of its amplitude where $cos (0) = 1$. I don't think this affects the veracity of the rest of the argument however...
            – aherring
            Aug 8 at 17:40













            Aslo I'm pretty sure that you mean to write $t_k+1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ instead of $t_k-1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$. Your statement is true (and trivial since $t_k-1-t_k = -(t_k - t_k-1)$ and $t_k - t_k-1 >0$), but not especially useful.
            – aherring
            Aug 8 at 19:27




            Aslo I'm pretty sure that you mean to write $t_k+1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ instead of $t_k-1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$. Your statement is true (and trivial since $t_k-1-t_k = -(t_k - t_k-1)$ and $t_k - t_k-1 >0$), but not especially useful.
            – aherring
            Aug 8 at 19:27












            @aherring As I titled my answer by Hint., my intention was to furnish some ideas to handle, obtaining a reasonable result. First note the ... so for $t > 1$ second, note that $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ is a consequence of the strict super linear increasing of $t^2-t$ for $t > 1$. This helps in the determination of $int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt$ Finally, a hint is a hint. Anyway, thanks for your explanations.
            – Cesareo
            Aug 8 at 20:49




            @aherring As I titled my answer by Hint., my intention was to furnish some ideas to handle, obtaining a reasonable result. First note the ... so for $t > 1$ second, note that $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ is a consequence of the strict super linear increasing of $t^2-t$ for $t > 1$. This helps in the determination of $int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt$ Finally, a hint is a hint. Anyway, thanks for your explanations.
            – Cesareo
            Aug 8 at 20:49












             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2876273%2fshow-that-lim-x-to-infty-int-0-x-cos-t3-t-dt-exists%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            1st Magritte Awards