Show that $lim_x to infty int_0 ^x cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$ exists

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have a tricky comprehensive exam problem that I've been wrestling with: it is exactly the problem in the title reproduced here:
Show that
$$lim_x to infty int_0 ^x cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$$
exists.
If we plot the function $f(t) = cos (t^3 + t)$ then it's "obvious" by inspection that the given limit exists: the periods for cosine are decreasing to zero. Even so, I don't really see an obvious candidate for what the limit might be (I believe it is positive.)
My first step was to write down just exactly what it means that the limit exists. The limit exists if there exists some number $L < infty$ with the following property: for any $varepsilon >0$ there exists some $y >0$ such that
$$
x >y implies left| int_0 ^x cos (t^3 + t) ,dt - L right| < varepsilon
$$
This is fine and good, but I immediately run in to the issue of not having a limit candidate $L$.
There's a problem in (baby) Rudin (Ch 6 Exc 13) which looks quite similar (in fact it was also given as a past comprehensive exam question) which is (in effect):
Show that
$$
lim_x to infty int_0 ^x sin (t^2) ,dt
$$
exists.
I'll note that Rudin walks through the solution to the above in 4 or 5 steps no one of which is obvious or trivial (at least not to me)...
Thus my question: is there some easy (read: easy enough that it would be reasonable to expect the problem to be solved in a comprehensive exam setting) way to solve one or both of these problems?
real-analysis improper-integrals
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have a tricky comprehensive exam problem that I've been wrestling with: it is exactly the problem in the title reproduced here:
Show that
$$lim_x to infty int_0 ^x cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$$
exists.
If we plot the function $f(t) = cos (t^3 + t)$ then it's "obvious" by inspection that the given limit exists: the periods for cosine are decreasing to zero. Even so, I don't really see an obvious candidate for what the limit might be (I believe it is positive.)
My first step was to write down just exactly what it means that the limit exists. The limit exists if there exists some number $L < infty$ with the following property: for any $varepsilon >0$ there exists some $y >0$ such that
$$
x >y implies left| int_0 ^x cos (t^3 + t) ,dt - L right| < varepsilon
$$
This is fine and good, but I immediately run in to the issue of not having a limit candidate $L$.
There's a problem in (baby) Rudin (Ch 6 Exc 13) which looks quite similar (in fact it was also given as a past comprehensive exam question) which is (in effect):
Show that
$$
lim_x to infty int_0 ^x sin (t^2) ,dt
$$
exists.
I'll note that Rudin walks through the solution to the above in 4 or 5 steps no one of which is obvious or trivial (at least not to me)...
Thus my question: is there some easy (read: easy enough that it would be reasonable to expect the problem to be solved in a comprehensive exam setting) way to solve one or both of these problems?
real-analysis improper-integrals
Hint : Integration by parts.
â Pjonin
Aug 8 at 16:14
How do you know $int_0^inftysin(t^2)~dt$ exists? Have you noticed any particular step from there may also be applicable here?
â Simply Beautiful Art
Aug 8 at 16:25
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have a tricky comprehensive exam problem that I've been wrestling with: it is exactly the problem in the title reproduced here:
Show that
$$lim_x to infty int_0 ^x cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$$
exists.
If we plot the function $f(t) = cos (t^3 + t)$ then it's "obvious" by inspection that the given limit exists: the periods for cosine are decreasing to zero. Even so, I don't really see an obvious candidate for what the limit might be (I believe it is positive.)
My first step was to write down just exactly what it means that the limit exists. The limit exists if there exists some number $L < infty$ with the following property: for any $varepsilon >0$ there exists some $y >0$ such that
$$
x >y implies left| int_0 ^x cos (t^3 + t) ,dt - L right| < varepsilon
$$
This is fine and good, but I immediately run in to the issue of not having a limit candidate $L$.
There's a problem in (baby) Rudin (Ch 6 Exc 13) which looks quite similar (in fact it was also given as a past comprehensive exam question) which is (in effect):
Show that
$$
lim_x to infty int_0 ^x sin (t^2) ,dt
$$
exists.
I'll note that Rudin walks through the solution to the above in 4 or 5 steps no one of which is obvious or trivial (at least not to me)...
Thus my question: is there some easy (read: easy enough that it would be reasonable to expect the problem to be solved in a comprehensive exam setting) way to solve one or both of these problems?
real-analysis improper-integrals
I have a tricky comprehensive exam problem that I've been wrestling with: it is exactly the problem in the title reproduced here:
Show that
$$lim_x to infty int_0 ^x cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$$
exists.
If we plot the function $f(t) = cos (t^3 + t)$ then it's "obvious" by inspection that the given limit exists: the periods for cosine are decreasing to zero. Even so, I don't really see an obvious candidate for what the limit might be (I believe it is positive.)
My first step was to write down just exactly what it means that the limit exists. The limit exists if there exists some number $L < infty$ with the following property: for any $varepsilon >0$ there exists some $y >0$ such that
$$
x >y implies left| int_0 ^x cos (t^3 + t) ,dt - L right| < varepsilon
$$
This is fine and good, but I immediately run in to the issue of not having a limit candidate $L$.
There's a problem in (baby) Rudin (Ch 6 Exc 13) which looks quite similar (in fact it was also given as a past comprehensive exam question) which is (in effect):
Show that
$$
lim_x to infty int_0 ^x sin (t^2) ,dt
$$
exists.
I'll note that Rudin walks through the solution to the above in 4 or 5 steps no one of which is obvious or trivial (at least not to me)...
Thus my question: is there some easy (read: easy enough that it would be reasonable to expect the problem to be solved in a comprehensive exam setting) way to solve one or both of these problems?
real-analysis improper-integrals
asked Aug 8 at 16:11
aherring
21917
21917
Hint : Integration by parts.
â Pjonin
Aug 8 at 16:14
How do you know $int_0^inftysin(t^2)~dt$ exists? Have you noticed any particular step from there may also be applicable here?
â Simply Beautiful Art
Aug 8 at 16:25
add a comment |Â
Hint : Integration by parts.
â Pjonin
Aug 8 at 16:14
How do you know $int_0^inftysin(t^2)~dt$ exists? Have you noticed any particular step from there may also be applicable here?
â Simply Beautiful Art
Aug 8 at 16:25
Hint : Integration by parts.
â Pjonin
Aug 8 at 16:14
Hint : Integration by parts.
â Pjonin
Aug 8 at 16:14
How do you know $int_0^inftysin(t^2)~dt$ exists? Have you noticed any particular step from there may also be applicable here?
â Simply Beautiful Art
Aug 8 at 16:25
How do you know $int_0^inftysin(t^2)~dt$ exists? Have you noticed any particular step from there may also be applicable here?
â Simply Beautiful Art
Aug 8 at 16:25
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
By Dirichlet's test, if $f(x)$ is differentiable, bounded and decreasing to $0$ on $mathbbR^+$, then the limit
$$ lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mcos(x)f(x),dx $$
is finite. Now $g(t)=t+t^3$ is increasing, differentiable and unbounded on $mathbbR^+$, together with its inverse function $h(t)$. In a right neighbourhood of the origin $h(t)sim t$, while in a left neighbourhood of $+infty$ we have $h(t)simsqrt[3]t$. By enforcing the substitution $t=h(x)$ we have
$$ int_0^Mcos(t+t^3),dt = int_0^g(M)cos(x) h'(x),dx $$
and we may apply the previous lemma since $h$ is concave on $(1,+infty)$.
With minor adjustements this approach proves the following useful Lemma:
If $f(x)/x$ is a differentiable, increasing and unbounded function on
$mathbbR^+$, the limit $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mexpleft(i
f(x)right),dx$ is finite.
About Fresnel's integral,
$$ int_0^Msin(x^2),dx = int_0^M^2fracsin(x)2sqrtx,dxstackreltextIBP=left[frac1-cos x2sqrtxright]_0^M^2+int_0^M^2frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx $$
where the first term of the RHS tends to zero as $Mto +infty$. The last integral is the integral of a positive function, where
$$ int_0^1frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx leq int_0^1fracfracx^224xsqrtx,dx=frac112 $$
and for any $Mgeq 1$
$$ int_1^M^2frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx leq int_1^M^2frac24xsqrtx,dx leq int_1^+inftyfracdx2xsqrtx = 1 $$
so the limit $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Msin(x^2),dx$ is positive, finite and less than $frac1312$. Its actual value is $frac12sqrtfracpi2$, as can be shown through the (inverse) Laplace transform or contour integration.
The actual value of $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mcos(t+t^3),dt$ is related to Airy's differential equation $f''(x)=xcdot f(x)$ and it is given by
$$ fracpisqrt[3]3,textAileft(frac1sqrt[3]3right)=frac13sum_k=0^infty 1over k!Gammaleft(k+1over 3right)sinleft(2pi (k+1)over 3right)approx sqrt2-1.$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Hint.
$$
t^3+t = fracpi2+kpi
$$
always have a real root $t_k$ for each $k$ So the integral can be considered as
$$
sum_k = 0^nint_t_k^t_k+1cos(t^3-t)dt
$$
which is an alternating series and also $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$
so for $t > 1$
$$
int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt
$$
giving an alternate series absolutely convergent.
Do you perhaps mean to have $cos (t^3 + t)$ in each of the three displayed integrals or am I missing something major? Also I suppose that the displayed series should have upper limit $infty$.
â aherring
Aug 8 at 17:29
Also I believe that in order to get a faithful representation of the integral as the suggested alternating series we need some term like $int_0 ^t_0 cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$. Indeed $t_0$ is the value where $t^3 + t = pi / 2$ and thus the first place where $cos (t^3 - t) = 0$: the original integral starts with cosine at the top of its amplitude where $cos (0) = 1$. I don't think this affects the veracity of the rest of the argument however...
â aherring
Aug 8 at 17:40
Aslo I'm pretty sure that you mean to write $t_k+1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ instead of $t_k-1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$. Your statement is true (and trivial since $t_k-1-t_k = -(t_k - t_k-1)$ and $t_k - t_k-1 >0$), but not especially useful.
â aherring
Aug 8 at 19:27
@aherring As I titled my answer by Hint., my intention was to furnish some ideas to handle, obtaining a reasonable result. First note the ... so for $t > 1$ second, note that $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ is a consequence of the strict super linear increasing of $t^2-t$ for $t > 1$. This helps in the determination of $int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt$ Finally, a hint is a hint. Anyway, thanks for your explanations.
â Cesareo
Aug 8 at 20:49
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
By Dirichlet's test, if $f(x)$ is differentiable, bounded and decreasing to $0$ on $mathbbR^+$, then the limit
$$ lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mcos(x)f(x),dx $$
is finite. Now $g(t)=t+t^3$ is increasing, differentiable and unbounded on $mathbbR^+$, together with its inverse function $h(t)$. In a right neighbourhood of the origin $h(t)sim t$, while in a left neighbourhood of $+infty$ we have $h(t)simsqrt[3]t$. By enforcing the substitution $t=h(x)$ we have
$$ int_0^Mcos(t+t^3),dt = int_0^g(M)cos(x) h'(x),dx $$
and we may apply the previous lemma since $h$ is concave on $(1,+infty)$.
With minor adjustements this approach proves the following useful Lemma:
If $f(x)/x$ is a differentiable, increasing and unbounded function on
$mathbbR^+$, the limit $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mexpleft(i
f(x)right),dx$ is finite.
About Fresnel's integral,
$$ int_0^Msin(x^2),dx = int_0^M^2fracsin(x)2sqrtx,dxstackreltextIBP=left[frac1-cos x2sqrtxright]_0^M^2+int_0^M^2frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx $$
where the first term of the RHS tends to zero as $Mto +infty$. The last integral is the integral of a positive function, where
$$ int_0^1frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx leq int_0^1fracfracx^224xsqrtx,dx=frac112 $$
and for any $Mgeq 1$
$$ int_1^M^2frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx leq int_1^M^2frac24xsqrtx,dx leq int_1^+inftyfracdx2xsqrtx = 1 $$
so the limit $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Msin(x^2),dx$ is positive, finite and less than $frac1312$. Its actual value is $frac12sqrtfracpi2$, as can be shown through the (inverse) Laplace transform or contour integration.
The actual value of $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mcos(t+t^3),dt$ is related to Airy's differential equation $f''(x)=xcdot f(x)$ and it is given by
$$ fracpisqrt[3]3,textAileft(frac1sqrt[3]3right)=frac13sum_k=0^infty 1over k!Gammaleft(k+1over 3right)sinleft(2pi (k+1)over 3right)approx sqrt2-1.$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
By Dirichlet's test, if $f(x)$ is differentiable, bounded and decreasing to $0$ on $mathbbR^+$, then the limit
$$ lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mcos(x)f(x),dx $$
is finite. Now $g(t)=t+t^3$ is increasing, differentiable and unbounded on $mathbbR^+$, together with its inverse function $h(t)$. In a right neighbourhood of the origin $h(t)sim t$, while in a left neighbourhood of $+infty$ we have $h(t)simsqrt[3]t$. By enforcing the substitution $t=h(x)$ we have
$$ int_0^Mcos(t+t^3),dt = int_0^g(M)cos(x) h'(x),dx $$
and we may apply the previous lemma since $h$ is concave on $(1,+infty)$.
With minor adjustements this approach proves the following useful Lemma:
If $f(x)/x$ is a differentiable, increasing and unbounded function on
$mathbbR^+$, the limit $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mexpleft(i
f(x)right),dx$ is finite.
About Fresnel's integral,
$$ int_0^Msin(x^2),dx = int_0^M^2fracsin(x)2sqrtx,dxstackreltextIBP=left[frac1-cos x2sqrtxright]_0^M^2+int_0^M^2frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx $$
where the first term of the RHS tends to zero as $Mto +infty$. The last integral is the integral of a positive function, where
$$ int_0^1frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx leq int_0^1fracfracx^224xsqrtx,dx=frac112 $$
and for any $Mgeq 1$
$$ int_1^M^2frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx leq int_1^M^2frac24xsqrtx,dx leq int_1^+inftyfracdx2xsqrtx = 1 $$
so the limit $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Msin(x^2),dx$ is positive, finite and less than $frac1312$. Its actual value is $frac12sqrtfracpi2$, as can be shown through the (inverse) Laplace transform or contour integration.
The actual value of $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mcos(t+t^3),dt$ is related to Airy's differential equation $f''(x)=xcdot f(x)$ and it is given by
$$ fracpisqrt[3]3,textAileft(frac1sqrt[3]3right)=frac13sum_k=0^infty 1over k!Gammaleft(k+1over 3right)sinleft(2pi (k+1)over 3right)approx sqrt2-1.$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
By Dirichlet's test, if $f(x)$ is differentiable, bounded and decreasing to $0$ on $mathbbR^+$, then the limit
$$ lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mcos(x)f(x),dx $$
is finite. Now $g(t)=t+t^3$ is increasing, differentiable and unbounded on $mathbbR^+$, together with its inverse function $h(t)$. In a right neighbourhood of the origin $h(t)sim t$, while in a left neighbourhood of $+infty$ we have $h(t)simsqrt[3]t$. By enforcing the substitution $t=h(x)$ we have
$$ int_0^Mcos(t+t^3),dt = int_0^g(M)cos(x) h'(x),dx $$
and we may apply the previous lemma since $h$ is concave on $(1,+infty)$.
With minor adjustements this approach proves the following useful Lemma:
If $f(x)/x$ is a differentiable, increasing and unbounded function on
$mathbbR^+$, the limit $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mexpleft(i
f(x)right),dx$ is finite.
About Fresnel's integral,
$$ int_0^Msin(x^2),dx = int_0^M^2fracsin(x)2sqrtx,dxstackreltextIBP=left[frac1-cos x2sqrtxright]_0^M^2+int_0^M^2frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx $$
where the first term of the RHS tends to zero as $Mto +infty$. The last integral is the integral of a positive function, where
$$ int_0^1frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx leq int_0^1fracfracx^224xsqrtx,dx=frac112 $$
and for any $Mgeq 1$
$$ int_1^M^2frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx leq int_1^M^2frac24xsqrtx,dx leq int_1^+inftyfracdx2xsqrtx = 1 $$
so the limit $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Msin(x^2),dx$ is positive, finite and less than $frac1312$. Its actual value is $frac12sqrtfracpi2$, as can be shown through the (inverse) Laplace transform or contour integration.
The actual value of $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mcos(t+t^3),dt$ is related to Airy's differential equation $f''(x)=xcdot f(x)$ and it is given by
$$ fracpisqrt[3]3,textAileft(frac1sqrt[3]3right)=frac13sum_k=0^infty 1over k!Gammaleft(k+1over 3right)sinleft(2pi (k+1)over 3right)approx sqrt2-1.$$
By Dirichlet's test, if $f(x)$ is differentiable, bounded and decreasing to $0$ on $mathbbR^+$, then the limit
$$ lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mcos(x)f(x),dx $$
is finite. Now $g(t)=t+t^3$ is increasing, differentiable and unbounded on $mathbbR^+$, together with its inverse function $h(t)$. In a right neighbourhood of the origin $h(t)sim t$, while in a left neighbourhood of $+infty$ we have $h(t)simsqrt[3]t$. By enforcing the substitution $t=h(x)$ we have
$$ int_0^Mcos(t+t^3),dt = int_0^g(M)cos(x) h'(x),dx $$
and we may apply the previous lemma since $h$ is concave on $(1,+infty)$.
With minor adjustements this approach proves the following useful Lemma:
If $f(x)/x$ is a differentiable, increasing and unbounded function on
$mathbbR^+$, the limit $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mexpleft(i
f(x)right),dx$ is finite.
About Fresnel's integral,
$$ int_0^Msin(x^2),dx = int_0^M^2fracsin(x)2sqrtx,dxstackreltextIBP=left[frac1-cos x2sqrtxright]_0^M^2+int_0^M^2frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx $$
where the first term of the RHS tends to zero as $Mto +infty$. The last integral is the integral of a positive function, where
$$ int_0^1frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx leq int_0^1fracfracx^224xsqrtx,dx=frac112 $$
and for any $Mgeq 1$
$$ int_1^M^2frac1-cos x4xsqrtx,dx leq int_1^M^2frac24xsqrtx,dx leq int_1^+inftyfracdx2xsqrtx = 1 $$
so the limit $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Msin(x^2),dx$ is positive, finite and less than $frac1312$. Its actual value is $frac12sqrtfracpi2$, as can be shown through the (inverse) Laplace transform or contour integration.
The actual value of $lim_Mto +inftyint_0^Mcos(t+t^3),dt$ is related to Airy's differential equation $f''(x)=xcdot f(x)$ and it is given by
$$ fracpisqrt[3]3,textAileft(frac1sqrt[3]3right)=frac13sum_k=0^infty 1over k!Gammaleft(k+1over 3right)sinleft(2pi (k+1)over 3right)approx sqrt2-1.$$
edited Aug 8 at 18:01
answered Aug 8 at 17:07
Jack D'Aurizioâ¦
271k31266630
271k31266630
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Hint.
$$
t^3+t = fracpi2+kpi
$$
always have a real root $t_k$ for each $k$ So the integral can be considered as
$$
sum_k = 0^nint_t_k^t_k+1cos(t^3-t)dt
$$
which is an alternating series and also $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$
so for $t > 1$
$$
int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt
$$
giving an alternate series absolutely convergent.
Do you perhaps mean to have $cos (t^3 + t)$ in each of the three displayed integrals or am I missing something major? Also I suppose that the displayed series should have upper limit $infty$.
â aherring
Aug 8 at 17:29
Also I believe that in order to get a faithful representation of the integral as the suggested alternating series we need some term like $int_0 ^t_0 cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$. Indeed $t_0$ is the value where $t^3 + t = pi / 2$ and thus the first place where $cos (t^3 - t) = 0$: the original integral starts with cosine at the top of its amplitude where $cos (0) = 1$. I don't think this affects the veracity of the rest of the argument however...
â aherring
Aug 8 at 17:40
Aslo I'm pretty sure that you mean to write $t_k+1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ instead of $t_k-1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$. Your statement is true (and trivial since $t_k-1-t_k = -(t_k - t_k-1)$ and $t_k - t_k-1 >0$), but not especially useful.
â aherring
Aug 8 at 19:27
@aherring As I titled my answer by Hint., my intention was to furnish some ideas to handle, obtaining a reasonable result. First note the ... so for $t > 1$ second, note that $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ is a consequence of the strict super linear increasing of $t^2-t$ for $t > 1$. This helps in the determination of $int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt$ Finally, a hint is a hint. Anyway, thanks for your explanations.
â Cesareo
Aug 8 at 20:49
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Hint.
$$
t^3+t = fracpi2+kpi
$$
always have a real root $t_k$ for each $k$ So the integral can be considered as
$$
sum_k = 0^nint_t_k^t_k+1cos(t^3-t)dt
$$
which is an alternating series and also $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$
so for $t > 1$
$$
int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt
$$
giving an alternate series absolutely convergent.
Do you perhaps mean to have $cos (t^3 + t)$ in each of the three displayed integrals or am I missing something major? Also I suppose that the displayed series should have upper limit $infty$.
â aherring
Aug 8 at 17:29
Also I believe that in order to get a faithful representation of the integral as the suggested alternating series we need some term like $int_0 ^t_0 cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$. Indeed $t_0$ is the value where $t^3 + t = pi / 2$ and thus the first place where $cos (t^3 - t) = 0$: the original integral starts with cosine at the top of its amplitude where $cos (0) = 1$. I don't think this affects the veracity of the rest of the argument however...
â aherring
Aug 8 at 17:40
Aslo I'm pretty sure that you mean to write $t_k+1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ instead of $t_k-1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$. Your statement is true (and trivial since $t_k-1-t_k = -(t_k - t_k-1)$ and $t_k - t_k-1 >0$), but not especially useful.
â aherring
Aug 8 at 19:27
@aherring As I titled my answer by Hint., my intention was to furnish some ideas to handle, obtaining a reasonable result. First note the ... so for $t > 1$ second, note that $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ is a consequence of the strict super linear increasing of $t^2-t$ for $t > 1$. This helps in the determination of $int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt$ Finally, a hint is a hint. Anyway, thanks for your explanations.
â Cesareo
Aug 8 at 20:49
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Hint.
$$
t^3+t = fracpi2+kpi
$$
always have a real root $t_k$ for each $k$ So the integral can be considered as
$$
sum_k = 0^nint_t_k^t_k+1cos(t^3-t)dt
$$
which is an alternating series and also $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$
so for $t > 1$
$$
int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt
$$
giving an alternate series absolutely convergent.
Hint.
$$
t^3+t = fracpi2+kpi
$$
always have a real root $t_k$ for each $k$ So the integral can be considered as
$$
sum_k = 0^nint_t_k^t_k+1cos(t^3-t)dt
$$
which is an alternating series and also $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$
so for $t > 1$
$$
int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt
$$
giving an alternate series absolutely convergent.
answered Aug 8 at 16:35
Cesareo
5,8572412
5,8572412
Do you perhaps mean to have $cos (t^3 + t)$ in each of the three displayed integrals or am I missing something major? Also I suppose that the displayed series should have upper limit $infty$.
â aherring
Aug 8 at 17:29
Also I believe that in order to get a faithful representation of the integral as the suggested alternating series we need some term like $int_0 ^t_0 cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$. Indeed $t_0$ is the value where $t^3 + t = pi / 2$ and thus the first place where $cos (t^3 - t) = 0$: the original integral starts with cosine at the top of its amplitude where $cos (0) = 1$. I don't think this affects the veracity of the rest of the argument however...
â aherring
Aug 8 at 17:40
Aslo I'm pretty sure that you mean to write $t_k+1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ instead of $t_k-1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$. Your statement is true (and trivial since $t_k-1-t_k = -(t_k - t_k-1)$ and $t_k - t_k-1 >0$), but not especially useful.
â aherring
Aug 8 at 19:27
@aherring As I titled my answer by Hint., my intention was to furnish some ideas to handle, obtaining a reasonable result. First note the ... so for $t > 1$ second, note that $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ is a consequence of the strict super linear increasing of $t^2-t$ for $t > 1$. This helps in the determination of $int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt$ Finally, a hint is a hint. Anyway, thanks for your explanations.
â Cesareo
Aug 8 at 20:49
add a comment |Â
Do you perhaps mean to have $cos (t^3 + t)$ in each of the three displayed integrals or am I missing something major? Also I suppose that the displayed series should have upper limit $infty$.
â aherring
Aug 8 at 17:29
Also I believe that in order to get a faithful representation of the integral as the suggested alternating series we need some term like $int_0 ^t_0 cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$. Indeed $t_0$ is the value where $t^3 + t = pi / 2$ and thus the first place where $cos (t^3 - t) = 0$: the original integral starts with cosine at the top of its amplitude where $cos (0) = 1$. I don't think this affects the veracity of the rest of the argument however...
â aherring
Aug 8 at 17:40
Aslo I'm pretty sure that you mean to write $t_k+1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ instead of $t_k-1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$. Your statement is true (and trivial since $t_k-1-t_k = -(t_k - t_k-1)$ and $t_k - t_k-1 >0$), but not especially useful.
â aherring
Aug 8 at 19:27
@aherring As I titled my answer by Hint., my intention was to furnish some ideas to handle, obtaining a reasonable result. First note the ... so for $t > 1$ second, note that $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ is a consequence of the strict super linear increasing of $t^2-t$ for $t > 1$. This helps in the determination of $int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt$ Finally, a hint is a hint. Anyway, thanks for your explanations.
â Cesareo
Aug 8 at 20:49
Do you perhaps mean to have $cos (t^3 + t)$ in each of the three displayed integrals or am I missing something major? Also I suppose that the displayed series should have upper limit $infty$.
â aherring
Aug 8 at 17:29
Do you perhaps mean to have $cos (t^3 + t)$ in each of the three displayed integrals or am I missing something major? Also I suppose that the displayed series should have upper limit $infty$.
â aherring
Aug 8 at 17:29
Also I believe that in order to get a faithful representation of the integral as the suggested alternating series we need some term like $int_0 ^t_0 cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$. Indeed $t_0$ is the value where $t^3 + t = pi / 2$ and thus the first place where $cos (t^3 - t) = 0$: the original integral starts with cosine at the top of its amplitude where $cos (0) = 1$. I don't think this affects the veracity of the rest of the argument however...
â aherring
Aug 8 at 17:40
Also I believe that in order to get a faithful representation of the integral as the suggested alternating series we need some term like $int_0 ^t_0 cos (t^3 + t) ,dt$. Indeed $t_0$ is the value where $t^3 + t = pi / 2$ and thus the first place where $cos (t^3 - t) = 0$: the original integral starts with cosine at the top of its amplitude where $cos (0) = 1$. I don't think this affects the veracity of the rest of the argument however...
â aherring
Aug 8 at 17:40
Aslo I'm pretty sure that you mean to write $t_k+1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ instead of $t_k-1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$. Your statement is true (and trivial since $t_k-1-t_k = -(t_k - t_k-1)$ and $t_k - t_k-1 >0$), but not especially useful.
â aherring
Aug 8 at 19:27
Aslo I'm pretty sure that you mean to write $t_k+1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ instead of $t_k-1 - t_k < t_k - t_k-1$. Your statement is true (and trivial since $t_k-1-t_k = -(t_k - t_k-1)$ and $t_k - t_k-1 >0$), but not especially useful.
â aherring
Aug 8 at 19:27
@aherring As I titled my answer by Hint., my intention was to furnish some ideas to handle, obtaining a reasonable result. First note the ... so for $t > 1$ second, note that $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ is a consequence of the strict super linear increasing of $t^2-t$ for $t > 1$. This helps in the determination of $int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt$ Finally, a hint is a hint. Anyway, thanks for your explanations.
â Cesareo
Aug 8 at 20:49
@aherring As I titled my answer by Hint., my intention was to furnish some ideas to handle, obtaining a reasonable result. First note the ... so for $t > 1$ second, note that $t_k-1-t_k < t_k - t_k-1$ is a consequence of the strict super linear increasing of $t^2-t$ for $t > 1$. This helps in the determination of $int_t_k+1^t_k+2| cos(t^3-t)| dt < int_t_k^t_k+1|cos(t^3-t)|dt$ Finally, a hint is a hint. Anyway, thanks for your explanations.
â Cesareo
Aug 8 at 20:49
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2876273%2fshow-that-lim-x-to-infty-int-0-x-cos-t3-t-dt-exists%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Hint : Integration by parts.
â Pjonin
Aug 8 at 16:14
How do you know $int_0^inftysin(t^2)~dt$ exists? Have you noticed any particular step from there may also be applicable here?
â Simply Beautiful Art
Aug 8 at 16:25