Duhamel's principle for equations which are not of evolution type

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Duhamel's principle gives the solutions of linear inhomogeneous evolution PDEs in terms of solutions of the associated homogenous problem. That is, the solution of the PDE
$$u_t(mathbfx,t)+sum_i=1^n a_i(mathbfx) u_x_i(mathbfx,t)=f(mathbfx,t), tag1 $$
can be expressed (using integrations) in terms of solutions of
$$u_t(mathbfx,t)+sum_i=1^n a_i(mathbfx) u_x_i(mathbfx,t)=0,$$
with varying initial conditions.



This is the multivariable analogue of the method of variation of parameters from ODEs, in which the inhomogeneous solution is expressed as a sum of the general solution of the associated homogeneous problem, and any particular solution.



I have been trying to generalize this




general soln of inhomo. = general soln of associated homo. + particular soln of inhomo.




to PDEs which are not of evolution type. That is, to PDEs for which there is no distinguished independent variable with the associated coefficient $=1$ in the PDE (without resorting to division by one of the coefficients).



For example, the PDE
$$x u_x+yu_y=f(x,y), $$
can be solved explicitly using the method of characteristics:
$$u(x,t)=phi left( fracxsqrtx^2+y^2,fracysqrtx^2+y^2 right)+int_1^sqrtx^2+y^2 f left( fracxsqrtx^2+y^2 s, fracysqrtx^2+y^2 s right) fracmathrmd ss. $$
Here $phi$ is an arbitrary function, which plays the role of the general solution of the associated homogeneous problem, while the integral part represents a a particular solution (the one satisfying $u equiv 0$ on the unit circle) of the inhomogeneous problem.



My questions are:



  1. In the case of a general first order PDE $(1)$, is knowledge of the form of the associated homogeneous solution sufficient for solving $(1)$ in general? If so, how?


  2. If a particular solution cannot be computed from the general solution of the associated homogeneous equation, is there any other way of forming a particular solution? It appears to me that it should be integral of the RHS along the corresponding characteristic curve with respect to some measure ($mathrmds/s$ in our example above).


Thank you!







share|cite|improve this question
























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Duhamel's principle gives the solutions of linear inhomogeneous evolution PDEs in terms of solutions of the associated homogenous problem. That is, the solution of the PDE
    $$u_t(mathbfx,t)+sum_i=1^n a_i(mathbfx) u_x_i(mathbfx,t)=f(mathbfx,t), tag1 $$
    can be expressed (using integrations) in terms of solutions of
    $$u_t(mathbfx,t)+sum_i=1^n a_i(mathbfx) u_x_i(mathbfx,t)=0,$$
    with varying initial conditions.



    This is the multivariable analogue of the method of variation of parameters from ODEs, in which the inhomogeneous solution is expressed as a sum of the general solution of the associated homogeneous problem, and any particular solution.



    I have been trying to generalize this




    general soln of inhomo. = general soln of associated homo. + particular soln of inhomo.




    to PDEs which are not of evolution type. That is, to PDEs for which there is no distinguished independent variable with the associated coefficient $=1$ in the PDE (without resorting to division by one of the coefficients).



    For example, the PDE
    $$x u_x+yu_y=f(x,y), $$
    can be solved explicitly using the method of characteristics:
    $$u(x,t)=phi left( fracxsqrtx^2+y^2,fracysqrtx^2+y^2 right)+int_1^sqrtx^2+y^2 f left( fracxsqrtx^2+y^2 s, fracysqrtx^2+y^2 s right) fracmathrmd ss. $$
    Here $phi$ is an arbitrary function, which plays the role of the general solution of the associated homogeneous problem, while the integral part represents a a particular solution (the one satisfying $u equiv 0$ on the unit circle) of the inhomogeneous problem.



    My questions are:



    1. In the case of a general first order PDE $(1)$, is knowledge of the form of the associated homogeneous solution sufficient for solving $(1)$ in general? If so, how?


    2. If a particular solution cannot be computed from the general solution of the associated homogeneous equation, is there any other way of forming a particular solution? It appears to me that it should be integral of the RHS along the corresponding characteristic curve with respect to some measure ($mathrmds/s$ in our example above).


    Thank you!







    share|cite|improve this question






















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Duhamel's principle gives the solutions of linear inhomogeneous evolution PDEs in terms of solutions of the associated homogenous problem. That is, the solution of the PDE
      $$u_t(mathbfx,t)+sum_i=1^n a_i(mathbfx) u_x_i(mathbfx,t)=f(mathbfx,t), tag1 $$
      can be expressed (using integrations) in terms of solutions of
      $$u_t(mathbfx,t)+sum_i=1^n a_i(mathbfx) u_x_i(mathbfx,t)=0,$$
      with varying initial conditions.



      This is the multivariable analogue of the method of variation of parameters from ODEs, in which the inhomogeneous solution is expressed as a sum of the general solution of the associated homogeneous problem, and any particular solution.



      I have been trying to generalize this




      general soln of inhomo. = general soln of associated homo. + particular soln of inhomo.




      to PDEs which are not of evolution type. That is, to PDEs for which there is no distinguished independent variable with the associated coefficient $=1$ in the PDE (without resorting to division by one of the coefficients).



      For example, the PDE
      $$x u_x+yu_y=f(x,y), $$
      can be solved explicitly using the method of characteristics:
      $$u(x,t)=phi left( fracxsqrtx^2+y^2,fracysqrtx^2+y^2 right)+int_1^sqrtx^2+y^2 f left( fracxsqrtx^2+y^2 s, fracysqrtx^2+y^2 s right) fracmathrmd ss. $$
      Here $phi$ is an arbitrary function, which plays the role of the general solution of the associated homogeneous problem, while the integral part represents a a particular solution (the one satisfying $u equiv 0$ on the unit circle) of the inhomogeneous problem.



      My questions are:



      1. In the case of a general first order PDE $(1)$, is knowledge of the form of the associated homogeneous solution sufficient for solving $(1)$ in general? If so, how?


      2. If a particular solution cannot be computed from the general solution of the associated homogeneous equation, is there any other way of forming a particular solution? It appears to me that it should be integral of the RHS along the corresponding characteristic curve with respect to some measure ($mathrmds/s$ in our example above).


      Thank you!







      share|cite|improve this question












      Duhamel's principle gives the solutions of linear inhomogeneous evolution PDEs in terms of solutions of the associated homogenous problem. That is, the solution of the PDE
      $$u_t(mathbfx,t)+sum_i=1^n a_i(mathbfx) u_x_i(mathbfx,t)=f(mathbfx,t), tag1 $$
      can be expressed (using integrations) in terms of solutions of
      $$u_t(mathbfx,t)+sum_i=1^n a_i(mathbfx) u_x_i(mathbfx,t)=0,$$
      with varying initial conditions.



      This is the multivariable analogue of the method of variation of parameters from ODEs, in which the inhomogeneous solution is expressed as a sum of the general solution of the associated homogeneous problem, and any particular solution.



      I have been trying to generalize this




      general soln of inhomo. = general soln of associated homo. + particular soln of inhomo.




      to PDEs which are not of evolution type. That is, to PDEs for which there is no distinguished independent variable with the associated coefficient $=1$ in the PDE (without resorting to division by one of the coefficients).



      For example, the PDE
      $$x u_x+yu_y=f(x,y), $$
      can be solved explicitly using the method of characteristics:
      $$u(x,t)=phi left( fracxsqrtx^2+y^2,fracysqrtx^2+y^2 right)+int_1^sqrtx^2+y^2 f left( fracxsqrtx^2+y^2 s, fracysqrtx^2+y^2 s right) fracmathrmd ss. $$
      Here $phi$ is an arbitrary function, which plays the role of the general solution of the associated homogeneous problem, while the integral part represents a a particular solution (the one satisfying $u equiv 0$ on the unit circle) of the inhomogeneous problem.



      My questions are:



      1. In the case of a general first order PDE $(1)$, is knowledge of the form of the associated homogeneous solution sufficient for solving $(1)$ in general? If so, how?


      2. If a particular solution cannot be computed from the general solution of the associated homogeneous equation, is there any other way of forming a particular solution? It appears to me that it should be integral of the RHS along the corresponding characteristic curve with respect to some measure ($mathrmds/s$ in our example above).


      Thank you!









      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Aug 8 at 20:58









      user1337

      16.5k42989




      16.5k42989

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2876584%2fduhamels-principle-for-equations-which-are-not-of-evolution-type%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2876584%2fduhamels-principle-for-equations-which-are-not-of-evolution-type%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          Mutual Information Always Non-negative

          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?