Stochastic orders of summands when sum has fixed distribution

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
-1
down vote

favorite
1












Suppose $X,X',Y,Y'$ are independent random variables. We know that $X+Y oversetd= X'+Y'oversetd=Uniform[0,1]$ and $Xprec X'$ in the sense that $P(X> x)le P(X'>x)$ for any $xin mathbbR$. Is it true that $Y'prec Y$?







share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    -1
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Suppose $X,X',Y,Y'$ are independent random variables. We know that $X+Y oversetd= X'+Y'oversetd=Uniform[0,1]$ and $Xprec X'$ in the sense that $P(X> x)le P(X'>x)$ for any $xin mathbbR$. Is it true that $Y'prec Y$?







    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      -1
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      -1
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Suppose $X,X',Y,Y'$ are independent random variables. We know that $X+Y oversetd= X'+Y'oversetd=Uniform[0,1]$ and $Xprec X'$ in the sense that $P(X> x)le P(X'>x)$ for any $xin mathbbR$. Is it true that $Y'prec Y$?







      share|cite|improve this question














      Suppose $X,X',Y,Y'$ are independent random variables. We know that $X+Y oversetd= X'+Y'oversetd=Uniform[0,1]$ and $Xprec X'$ in the sense that $P(X> x)le P(X'>x)$ for any $xin mathbbR$. Is it true that $Y'prec Y$?









      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 9 at 23:31

























      asked Aug 8 at 22:02









      Uchiha

      1249




      1249




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          This is an answer to the earlier version of the question where $X+Y$ was not required to have uniform distribution. This is false. If this implication is true then the following must also be true: $X,X',Y,Y'$ independent, $X+Y overset d =X'+Y'$ and $Xoverset d=X'$ implies $Yoverset d=Y'$. It is well known that there exist characteristic functions $phi, phi_1,phi_2$ such that $phi (t) phi_1(t)=phi (t) phi_2(t)$ for all $t$ but $phi_1 neq phi_2$. Such an example is available in Volume 2 of Feller's book. [ See Curiosities ii) in Section 2 of the chapter on Characteristic Functions]. Now just consider independent random variables $X,X',Y,Y'$ such that $X$ and $X'$ have characteristic function $phi $, $Y$ has characteristic function $phi_1$ and $Y'$ has characteristic function $phi_2$ to get a contradiction.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Thanks. The equality $phi(t)phi_1(t)=phi(t)phi_2(t)$ means that $phi(t)$ must be zero somewhere. If we know in addition that $X+Yoversetd=$ Uniform[0,1], would there be a counterexample?
            – Uchiha
            Aug 9 at 23:30











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2876629%2fstochastic-orders-of-summands-when-sum-has-fixed-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote













          This is an answer to the earlier version of the question where $X+Y$ was not required to have uniform distribution. This is false. If this implication is true then the following must also be true: $X,X',Y,Y'$ independent, $X+Y overset d =X'+Y'$ and $Xoverset d=X'$ implies $Yoverset d=Y'$. It is well known that there exist characteristic functions $phi, phi_1,phi_2$ such that $phi (t) phi_1(t)=phi (t) phi_2(t)$ for all $t$ but $phi_1 neq phi_2$. Such an example is available in Volume 2 of Feller's book. [ See Curiosities ii) in Section 2 of the chapter on Characteristic Functions]. Now just consider independent random variables $X,X',Y,Y'$ such that $X$ and $X'$ have characteristic function $phi $, $Y$ has characteristic function $phi_1$ and $Y'$ has characteristic function $phi_2$ to get a contradiction.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Thanks. The equality $phi(t)phi_1(t)=phi(t)phi_2(t)$ means that $phi(t)$ must be zero somewhere. If we know in addition that $X+Yoversetd=$ Uniform[0,1], would there be a counterexample?
            – Uchiha
            Aug 9 at 23:30















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          This is an answer to the earlier version of the question where $X+Y$ was not required to have uniform distribution. This is false. If this implication is true then the following must also be true: $X,X',Y,Y'$ independent, $X+Y overset d =X'+Y'$ and $Xoverset d=X'$ implies $Yoverset d=Y'$. It is well known that there exist characteristic functions $phi, phi_1,phi_2$ such that $phi (t) phi_1(t)=phi (t) phi_2(t)$ for all $t$ but $phi_1 neq phi_2$. Such an example is available in Volume 2 of Feller's book. [ See Curiosities ii) in Section 2 of the chapter on Characteristic Functions]. Now just consider independent random variables $X,X',Y,Y'$ such that $X$ and $X'$ have characteristic function $phi $, $Y$ has characteristic function $phi_1$ and $Y'$ has characteristic function $phi_2$ to get a contradiction.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Thanks. The equality $phi(t)phi_1(t)=phi(t)phi_2(t)$ means that $phi(t)$ must be zero somewhere. If we know in addition that $X+Yoversetd=$ Uniform[0,1], would there be a counterexample?
            – Uchiha
            Aug 9 at 23:30













          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          This is an answer to the earlier version of the question where $X+Y$ was not required to have uniform distribution. This is false. If this implication is true then the following must also be true: $X,X',Y,Y'$ independent, $X+Y overset d =X'+Y'$ and $Xoverset d=X'$ implies $Yoverset d=Y'$. It is well known that there exist characteristic functions $phi, phi_1,phi_2$ such that $phi (t) phi_1(t)=phi (t) phi_2(t)$ for all $t$ but $phi_1 neq phi_2$. Such an example is available in Volume 2 of Feller's book. [ See Curiosities ii) in Section 2 of the chapter on Characteristic Functions]. Now just consider independent random variables $X,X',Y,Y'$ such that $X$ and $X'$ have characteristic function $phi $, $Y$ has characteristic function $phi_1$ and $Y'$ has characteristic function $phi_2$ to get a contradiction.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          This is an answer to the earlier version of the question where $X+Y$ was not required to have uniform distribution. This is false. If this implication is true then the following must also be true: $X,X',Y,Y'$ independent, $X+Y overset d =X'+Y'$ and $Xoverset d=X'$ implies $Yoverset d=Y'$. It is well known that there exist characteristic functions $phi, phi_1,phi_2$ such that $phi (t) phi_1(t)=phi (t) phi_2(t)$ for all $t$ but $phi_1 neq phi_2$. Such an example is available in Volume 2 of Feller's book. [ See Curiosities ii) in Section 2 of the chapter on Characteristic Functions]. Now just consider independent random variables $X,X',Y,Y'$ such that $X$ and $X'$ have characteristic function $phi $, $Y$ has characteristic function $phi_1$ and $Y'$ has characteristic function $phi_2$ to get a contradiction.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Aug 9 at 23:33

























          answered Aug 9 at 12:01









          Kavi Rama Murthy

          21.4k2830




          21.4k2830











          • Thanks. The equality $phi(t)phi_1(t)=phi(t)phi_2(t)$ means that $phi(t)$ must be zero somewhere. If we know in addition that $X+Yoversetd=$ Uniform[0,1], would there be a counterexample?
            – Uchiha
            Aug 9 at 23:30

















          • Thanks. The equality $phi(t)phi_1(t)=phi(t)phi_2(t)$ means that $phi(t)$ must be zero somewhere. If we know in addition that $X+Yoversetd=$ Uniform[0,1], would there be a counterexample?
            – Uchiha
            Aug 9 at 23:30
















          Thanks. The equality $phi(t)phi_1(t)=phi(t)phi_2(t)$ means that $phi(t)$ must be zero somewhere. If we know in addition that $X+Yoversetd=$ Uniform[0,1], would there be a counterexample?
          – Uchiha
          Aug 9 at 23:30





          Thanks. The equality $phi(t)phi_1(t)=phi(t)phi_2(t)$ means that $phi(t)$ must be zero somewhere. If we know in addition that $X+Yoversetd=$ Uniform[0,1], would there be a counterexample?
          – Uchiha
          Aug 9 at 23:30













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2876629%2fstochastic-orders-of-summands-when-sum-has-fixed-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          Mutual Information Always Non-negative

          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?