Does $f(x) = frac12x^TAx$ have an L-Lipschitz continuous gradient
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Does $f(x) = frac12x^TAx$ have an L-Lipschitz continuous gradient i.e there is a constant L>0 such that
$$||nabla f(x) - nabla f(y)||_2 le L||x-y||_2$$ for any $x,y$?
I tried to derive it but could not go further than this: $$||(x^T-y^T)A||_2 le L||x-y||_2$$
I would appreciate any help.
lipschitz-functions gradient-descent non-convex-optimization
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Does $f(x) = frac12x^TAx$ have an L-Lipschitz continuous gradient i.e there is a constant L>0 such that
$$||nabla f(x) - nabla f(y)||_2 le L||x-y||_2$$ for any $x,y$?
I tried to derive it but could not go further than this: $$||(x^T-y^T)A||_2 le L||x-y||_2$$
I would appreciate any help.
lipschitz-functions gradient-descent non-convex-optimization
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Does $f(x) = frac12x^TAx$ have an L-Lipschitz continuous gradient i.e there is a constant L>0 such that
$$||nabla f(x) - nabla f(y)||_2 le L||x-y||_2$$ for any $x,y$?
I tried to derive it but could not go further than this: $$||(x^T-y^T)A||_2 le L||x-y||_2$$
I would appreciate any help.
lipschitz-functions gradient-descent non-convex-optimization
Does $f(x) = frac12x^TAx$ have an L-Lipschitz continuous gradient i.e there is a constant L>0 such that
$$||nabla f(x) - nabla f(y)||_2 le L||x-y||_2$$ for any $x,y$?
I tried to derive it but could not go further than this: $$||(x^T-y^T)A||_2 le L||x-y||_2$$
I would appreciate any help.
lipschitz-functions gradient-descent non-convex-optimization
asked Aug 8 at 18:01
Pumpkin
4261417
4261417
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
The function is $L$-Lipschitz, where $L$ is the operator norm of $A$.
The operator norm is defined as
$$|A|_op := sup_x ne 0 fracA x.$$
Indeed, from your work we have
$$|nabla f(x) - nabla f(y)|_2 = |A(x-y)|_2 le |A|_op |x-y|_2$$
simply by the definition of operator norm.
One can show that the operator norm is equal to the largest singular value of $A$. Further, if $A$ is symmetric (and thus orthogonally diagonalizable), it is equal to the largest absolute eigenvalue, $max_i |lambda_i|$.
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
The function is $L$-Lipschitz, where $L$ is the operator norm of $A$.
The operator norm is defined as
$$|A|_op := sup_x ne 0 fracA x.$$
Indeed, from your work we have
$$|nabla f(x) - nabla f(y)|_2 = |A(x-y)|_2 le |A|_op |x-y|_2$$
simply by the definition of operator norm.
One can show that the operator norm is equal to the largest singular value of $A$. Further, if $A$ is symmetric (and thus orthogonally diagonalizable), it is equal to the largest absolute eigenvalue, $max_i |lambda_i|$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
The function is $L$-Lipschitz, where $L$ is the operator norm of $A$.
The operator norm is defined as
$$|A|_op := sup_x ne 0 fracA x.$$
Indeed, from your work we have
$$|nabla f(x) - nabla f(y)|_2 = |A(x-y)|_2 le |A|_op |x-y|_2$$
simply by the definition of operator norm.
One can show that the operator norm is equal to the largest singular value of $A$. Further, if $A$ is symmetric (and thus orthogonally diagonalizable), it is equal to the largest absolute eigenvalue, $max_i |lambda_i|$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
The function is $L$-Lipschitz, where $L$ is the operator norm of $A$.
The operator norm is defined as
$$|A|_op := sup_x ne 0 fracA x.$$
Indeed, from your work we have
$$|nabla f(x) - nabla f(y)|_2 = |A(x-y)|_2 le |A|_op |x-y|_2$$
simply by the definition of operator norm.
One can show that the operator norm is equal to the largest singular value of $A$. Further, if $A$ is symmetric (and thus orthogonally diagonalizable), it is equal to the largest absolute eigenvalue, $max_i |lambda_i|$.
The function is $L$-Lipschitz, where $L$ is the operator norm of $A$.
The operator norm is defined as
$$|A|_op := sup_x ne 0 fracA x.$$
Indeed, from your work we have
$$|nabla f(x) - nabla f(y)|_2 = |A(x-y)|_2 le |A|_op |x-y|_2$$
simply by the definition of operator norm.
One can show that the operator norm is equal to the largest singular value of $A$. Further, if $A$ is symmetric (and thus orthogonally diagonalizable), it is equal to the largest absolute eigenvalue, $max_i |lambda_i|$.
answered Aug 8 at 18:14
angryavian
34.8k12874
34.8k12874
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2876393%2fdoes-fx-frac12xtax-have-an-l-lipschitz-continuous-gradient%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password