Meaning of “Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models were multivariable adjusted for age, gender ..” etc

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
1
down vote

favorite












From the abstract to the study titled "Association between the antioxidant uric acid and depression and antidepressant medication use in 96 989 individuals":




We examined plasma levels of the antioxidant uric acid in 96 989 individuals from two independent cohort studies. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models were multivariable adjusted for age, gender, alcohol, smoking, income, body mass index, C-reactive protein, hemoglobin, triglycerides, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and intake of meat and vegetables. Results were performed separately in each study and combined in a meta-analysis.




What is the meaning of this in simple terms?



As I understand, the authors used "logistic regression models" and "Cox proportional hazards regression models", and these models were "multivariable adjusted".



But what does it mean - "multivariable adjusted"? I would like to have a simplified explanation as an aid to translation.







share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    From the abstract to the study titled "Association between the antioxidant uric acid and depression and antidepressant medication use in 96 989 individuals":




    We examined plasma levels of the antioxidant uric acid in 96 989 individuals from two independent cohort studies. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models were multivariable adjusted for age, gender, alcohol, smoking, income, body mass index, C-reactive protein, hemoglobin, triglycerides, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and intake of meat and vegetables. Results were performed separately in each study and combined in a meta-analysis.




    What is the meaning of this in simple terms?



    As I understand, the authors used "logistic regression models" and "Cox proportional hazards regression models", and these models were "multivariable adjusted".



    But what does it mean - "multivariable adjusted"? I would like to have a simplified explanation as an aid to translation.







    share|cite|improve this question






















      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      From the abstract to the study titled "Association between the antioxidant uric acid and depression and antidepressant medication use in 96 989 individuals":




      We examined plasma levels of the antioxidant uric acid in 96 989 individuals from two independent cohort studies. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models were multivariable adjusted for age, gender, alcohol, smoking, income, body mass index, C-reactive protein, hemoglobin, triglycerides, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and intake of meat and vegetables. Results were performed separately in each study and combined in a meta-analysis.




      What is the meaning of this in simple terms?



      As I understand, the authors used "logistic regression models" and "Cox proportional hazards regression models", and these models were "multivariable adjusted".



      But what does it mean - "multivariable adjusted"? I would like to have a simplified explanation as an aid to translation.







      share|cite|improve this question












      From the abstract to the study titled "Association between the antioxidant uric acid and depression and antidepressant medication use in 96 989 individuals":




      We examined plasma levels of the antioxidant uric acid in 96 989 individuals from two independent cohort studies. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models were multivariable adjusted for age, gender, alcohol, smoking, income, body mass index, C-reactive protein, hemoglobin, triglycerides, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and intake of meat and vegetables. Results were performed separately in each study and combined in a meta-analysis.




      What is the meaning of this in simple terms?



      As I understand, the authors used "logistic regression models" and "Cox proportional hazards regression models", and these models were "multivariable adjusted".



      But what does it mean - "multivariable adjusted"? I would like to have a simplified explanation as an aid to translation.









      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Aug 8 at 15:31









      CopperKettle

      285110




      285110




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted










          On the one hand, we don't know what the authors did. So if you want a definitive answer, I'd recommend you ask the authors themselves.



          On the other hand, this language is consistent with straight-up logistic or Cox regressions that included all the covariates that were "multivariable adjusted for", plus the ones that were of primary interest. I often see German psychologists use similar language in such a case. Note that the authors are almost certainly not English native speakers, to judge from their names and affiliations.



          Adjusting and controlling for variables is discussed at length here.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "65"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f361309%2fmeaning-of-logistic-regression-and-cox-proportional-hazards-regression-models-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            6
            down vote



            accepted










            On the one hand, we don't know what the authors did. So if you want a definitive answer, I'd recommend you ask the authors themselves.



            On the other hand, this language is consistent with straight-up logistic or Cox regressions that included all the covariates that were "multivariable adjusted for", plus the ones that were of primary interest. I often see German psychologists use similar language in such a case. Note that the authors are almost certainly not English native speakers, to judge from their names and affiliations.



            Adjusting and controlling for variables is discussed at length here.






            share|cite|improve this answer
























              up vote
              6
              down vote



              accepted










              On the one hand, we don't know what the authors did. So if you want a definitive answer, I'd recommend you ask the authors themselves.



              On the other hand, this language is consistent with straight-up logistic or Cox regressions that included all the covariates that were "multivariable adjusted for", plus the ones that were of primary interest. I often see German psychologists use similar language in such a case. Note that the authors are almost certainly not English native speakers, to judge from their names and affiliations.



              Adjusting and controlling for variables is discussed at length here.






              share|cite|improve this answer






















                up vote
                6
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                6
                down vote



                accepted






                On the one hand, we don't know what the authors did. So if you want a definitive answer, I'd recommend you ask the authors themselves.



                On the other hand, this language is consistent with straight-up logistic or Cox regressions that included all the covariates that were "multivariable adjusted for", plus the ones that were of primary interest. I often see German psychologists use similar language in such a case. Note that the authors are almost certainly not English native speakers, to judge from their names and affiliations.



                Adjusting and controlling for variables is discussed at length here.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                On the one hand, we don't know what the authors did. So if you want a definitive answer, I'd recommend you ask the authors themselves.



                On the other hand, this language is consistent with straight-up logistic or Cox regressions that included all the covariates that were "multivariable adjusted for", plus the ones that were of primary interest. I often see German psychologists use similar language in such a case. Note that the authors are almost certainly not English native speakers, to judge from their names and affiliations.



                Adjusting and controlling for variables is discussed at length here.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Aug 8 at 15:42









                Stephan Kolassa

                40.3k685147




                40.3k685147






















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f361309%2fmeaning-of-logistic-regression-and-cox-proportional-hazards-regression-models-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    這個網誌中的熱門文章

                    How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                    Mutual Information Always Non-negative

                    Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?