How to write this expression?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
How can I write the vertical line in this expression?
It is as tall as the before relation.
symbols
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
How can I write the vertical line in this expression?
It is as tall as the before relation.
symbols
1
Are answers to this question what you're after?
â Dai Bowen
Aug 8 at 13:57
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
How can I write the vertical line in this expression?
It is as tall as the before relation.
symbols
How can I write the vertical line in this expression?
It is as tall as the before relation.
symbols
asked Aug 8 at 13:51
Perfect Fluid
516
516
1
Are answers to this question what you're after?
â Dai Bowen
Aug 8 at 13:57
add a comment |Â
1
Are answers to this question what you're after?
â Dai Bowen
Aug 8 at 13:57
1
1
Are answers to this question what you're after?
â Dai Bowen
Aug 8 at 13:57
Are answers to this question what you're after?
â Dai Bowen
Aug 8 at 13:57
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
You can do
documentclassarticle
begindocument
beginequation
4piepsilon^2fracdtildeGdRbiggr|_R=epsilon.
endequation
enddocument
Some more details on the use of bigl
... can be found in this post.
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
You can use the esdiff
package, for a simpler typing of derivatives (partial or not) of any order in Leibniz notation. For derivatives evaluated at some point, you have a diff*
command with 3 arguments, the function, the variable and the evaluation point, but it uses a pair of parentheses. If you want a single vertical line, you have to do it by hand. Here is an example of both:
documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackageesdiff
begindocument
[ 4pivarepsilon ^2diff*widetildeGRR = varepsilon ]%
[ 4pivarepsilon ^2diffwidetildeGRbiggmvert_R = varepsilon ]%
enddocument
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
If you prefer to have the same image you inserted with the same symbols, you can also use my code (with slanted operator "d" or vertical mode for "d")
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]article
usepackageamsmath,amssymb
usepackagetimes
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagefancybox
usepackagexcolor
begindocument
[colorboxgray!20_R=varepsilon.$]
[colorboxgray!20$4pivarepsilon^2dfracmathrmdtildeGmathrmdRbiggr]
enddocument
1
@Sebatiano: Nicely done within a colored box. However don't forget that "derivation" is an operation and so the symbol "d" in that case needs to be an operator - meaning being upright.
â Jürgen G
Aug 8 at 21:20
Thank you very much for your compliments. I have not positioned the "d" in an upright position because in Italy (you could see many pantries on the net) the "d" is positioned in an inclined position. Thank you very much. Now I have added the "d" as a vertical position.
â Sebastiano
Aug 8 at 21:25
1
@Sebatiano: ... you say they do operators in "italics"? ... What a word game though :-) As far as I was taught, operators should be upright, independent from which country they come along ... Maybe I was taught wrong or it is just a matter of "personal style"
â Jürgen G
Aug 8 at 21:32
1
I could see you now provide the "operator" version. +1 though!!!
â Jürgen G
Aug 8 at 21:34
@JürgenG Look here to pag. 5: dm.unibo.it/~barozzi/MI2/PDF/MI2-Cap.8.pdf. It is only an example.
â Sebastiano
Aug 8 at 21:35
 |Â
show 2 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
You can do
documentclassarticle
begindocument
beginequation
4piepsilon^2fracdtildeGdRbiggr|_R=epsilon.
endequation
enddocument
Some more details on the use of bigl
... can be found in this post.
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
You can do
documentclassarticle
begindocument
beginequation
4piepsilon^2fracdtildeGdRbiggr|_R=epsilon.
endequation
enddocument
Some more details on the use of bigl
... can be found in this post.
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
You can do
documentclassarticle
begindocument
beginequation
4piepsilon^2fracdtildeGdRbiggr|_R=epsilon.
endequation
enddocument
Some more details on the use of bigl
... can be found in this post.
You can do
documentclassarticle
begindocument
beginequation
4piepsilon^2fracdtildeGdRbiggr|_R=epsilon.
endequation
enddocument
Some more details on the use of bigl
... can be found in this post.
answered Aug 8 at 14:00
BambOo
2,173222
2,173222
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
You can use the esdiff
package, for a simpler typing of derivatives (partial or not) of any order in Leibniz notation. For derivatives evaluated at some point, you have a diff*
command with 3 arguments, the function, the variable and the evaluation point, but it uses a pair of parentheses. If you want a single vertical line, you have to do it by hand. Here is an example of both:
documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackageesdiff
begindocument
[ 4pivarepsilon ^2diff*widetildeGRR = varepsilon ]%
[ 4pivarepsilon ^2diffwidetildeGRbiggmvert_R = varepsilon ]%
enddocument
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
You can use the esdiff
package, for a simpler typing of derivatives (partial or not) of any order in Leibniz notation. For derivatives evaluated at some point, you have a diff*
command with 3 arguments, the function, the variable and the evaluation point, but it uses a pair of parentheses. If you want a single vertical line, you have to do it by hand. Here is an example of both:
documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackageesdiff
begindocument
[ 4pivarepsilon ^2diff*widetildeGRR = varepsilon ]%
[ 4pivarepsilon ^2diffwidetildeGRbiggmvert_R = varepsilon ]%
enddocument
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
You can use the esdiff
package, for a simpler typing of derivatives (partial or not) of any order in Leibniz notation. For derivatives evaluated at some point, you have a diff*
command with 3 arguments, the function, the variable and the evaluation point, but it uses a pair of parentheses. If you want a single vertical line, you have to do it by hand. Here is an example of both:
documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackageesdiff
begindocument
[ 4pivarepsilon ^2diff*widetildeGRR = varepsilon ]%
[ 4pivarepsilon ^2diffwidetildeGRbiggmvert_R = varepsilon ]%
enddocument
You can use the esdiff
package, for a simpler typing of derivatives (partial or not) of any order in Leibniz notation. For derivatives evaluated at some point, you have a diff*
command with 3 arguments, the function, the variable and the evaluation point, but it uses a pair of parentheses. If you want a single vertical line, you have to do it by hand. Here is an example of both:
documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackageesdiff
begindocument
[ 4pivarepsilon ^2diff*widetildeGRR = varepsilon ]%
[ 4pivarepsilon ^2diffwidetildeGRbiggmvert_R = varepsilon ]%
enddocument
edited Aug 8 at 14:35
answered Aug 8 at 14:19
Bernard
153k762188
153k762188
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
If you prefer to have the same image you inserted with the same symbols, you can also use my code (with slanted operator "d" or vertical mode for "d")
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]article
usepackageamsmath,amssymb
usepackagetimes
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagefancybox
usepackagexcolor
begindocument
[colorboxgray!20_R=varepsilon.$]
[colorboxgray!20$4pivarepsilon^2dfracmathrmdtildeGmathrmdRbiggr]
enddocument
1
@Sebatiano: Nicely done within a colored box. However don't forget that "derivation" is an operation and so the symbol "d" in that case needs to be an operator - meaning being upright.
â Jürgen G
Aug 8 at 21:20
Thank you very much for your compliments. I have not positioned the "d" in an upright position because in Italy (you could see many pantries on the net) the "d" is positioned in an inclined position. Thank you very much. Now I have added the "d" as a vertical position.
â Sebastiano
Aug 8 at 21:25
1
@Sebatiano: ... you say they do operators in "italics"? ... What a word game though :-) As far as I was taught, operators should be upright, independent from which country they come along ... Maybe I was taught wrong or it is just a matter of "personal style"
â Jürgen G
Aug 8 at 21:32
1
I could see you now provide the "operator" version. +1 though!!!
â Jürgen G
Aug 8 at 21:34
@JürgenG Look here to pag. 5: dm.unibo.it/~barozzi/MI2/PDF/MI2-Cap.8.pdf. It is only an example.
â Sebastiano
Aug 8 at 21:35
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
5
down vote
If you prefer to have the same image you inserted with the same symbols, you can also use my code (with slanted operator "d" or vertical mode for "d")
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]article
usepackageamsmath,amssymb
usepackagetimes
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagefancybox
usepackagexcolor
begindocument
[colorboxgray!20_R=varepsilon.$]
[colorboxgray!20$4pivarepsilon^2dfracmathrmdtildeGmathrmdRbiggr]
enddocument
1
@Sebatiano: Nicely done within a colored box. However don't forget that "derivation" is an operation and so the symbol "d" in that case needs to be an operator - meaning being upright.
â Jürgen G
Aug 8 at 21:20
Thank you very much for your compliments. I have not positioned the "d" in an upright position because in Italy (you could see many pantries on the net) the "d" is positioned in an inclined position. Thank you very much. Now I have added the "d" as a vertical position.
â Sebastiano
Aug 8 at 21:25
1
@Sebatiano: ... you say they do operators in "italics"? ... What a word game though :-) As far as I was taught, operators should be upright, independent from which country they come along ... Maybe I was taught wrong or it is just a matter of "personal style"
â Jürgen G
Aug 8 at 21:32
1
I could see you now provide the "operator" version. +1 though!!!
â Jürgen G
Aug 8 at 21:34
@JürgenG Look here to pag. 5: dm.unibo.it/~barozzi/MI2/PDF/MI2-Cap.8.pdf. It is only an example.
â Sebastiano
Aug 8 at 21:35
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
If you prefer to have the same image you inserted with the same symbols, you can also use my code (with slanted operator "d" or vertical mode for "d")
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]article
usepackageamsmath,amssymb
usepackagetimes
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagefancybox
usepackagexcolor
begindocument
[colorboxgray!20_R=varepsilon.$]
[colorboxgray!20$4pivarepsilon^2dfracmathrmdtildeGmathrmdRbiggr]
enddocument
If you prefer to have the same image you inserted with the same symbols, you can also use my code (with slanted operator "d" or vertical mode for "d")
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]article
usepackageamsmath,amssymb
usepackagetimes
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagefancybox
usepackagexcolor
begindocument
[colorboxgray!20_R=varepsilon.$]
[colorboxgray!20$4pivarepsilon^2dfracmathrmdtildeGmathrmdRbiggr]
enddocument
edited Aug 8 at 21:28
answered Aug 8 at 21:02
Sebastiano
6,92931249
6,92931249
1
@Sebatiano: Nicely done within a colored box. However don't forget that "derivation" is an operation and so the symbol "d" in that case needs to be an operator - meaning being upright.
â Jürgen G
Aug 8 at 21:20
Thank you very much for your compliments. I have not positioned the "d" in an upright position because in Italy (you could see many pantries on the net) the "d" is positioned in an inclined position. Thank you very much. Now I have added the "d" as a vertical position.
â Sebastiano
Aug 8 at 21:25
1
@Sebatiano: ... you say they do operators in "italics"? ... What a word game though :-) As far as I was taught, operators should be upright, independent from which country they come along ... Maybe I was taught wrong or it is just a matter of "personal style"
â Jürgen G
Aug 8 at 21:32
1
I could see you now provide the "operator" version. +1 though!!!
â Jürgen G
Aug 8 at 21:34
@JürgenG Look here to pag. 5: dm.unibo.it/~barozzi/MI2/PDF/MI2-Cap.8.pdf. It is only an example.
â Sebastiano
Aug 8 at 21:35
 |Â
show 2 more comments
1
@Sebatiano: Nicely done within a colored box. However don't forget that "derivation" is an operation and so the symbol "d" in that case needs to be an operator - meaning being upright.
â Jürgen G
Aug 8 at 21:20
Thank you very much for your compliments. I have not positioned the "d" in an upright position because in Italy (you could see many pantries on the net) the "d" is positioned in an inclined position. Thank you very much. Now I have added the "d" as a vertical position.
â Sebastiano
Aug 8 at 21:25
1
@Sebatiano: ... you say they do operators in "italics"? ... What a word game though :-) As far as I was taught, operators should be upright, independent from which country they come along ... Maybe I was taught wrong or it is just a matter of "personal style"
â Jürgen G
Aug 8 at 21:32
1
I could see you now provide the "operator" version. +1 though!!!
â Jürgen G
Aug 8 at 21:34
@JürgenG Look here to pag. 5: dm.unibo.it/~barozzi/MI2/PDF/MI2-Cap.8.pdf. It is only an example.
â Sebastiano
Aug 8 at 21:35
1
1
@Sebatiano: Nicely done within a colored box. However don't forget that "derivation" is an operation and so the symbol "d" in that case needs to be an operator - meaning being upright.
â Jürgen G
Aug 8 at 21:20
@Sebatiano: Nicely done within a colored box. However don't forget that "derivation" is an operation and so the symbol "d" in that case needs to be an operator - meaning being upright.
â Jürgen G
Aug 8 at 21:20
Thank you very much for your compliments. I have not positioned the "d" in an upright position because in Italy (you could see many pantries on the net) the "d" is positioned in an inclined position. Thank you very much. Now I have added the "d" as a vertical position.
â Sebastiano
Aug 8 at 21:25
Thank you very much for your compliments. I have not positioned the "d" in an upright position because in Italy (you could see many pantries on the net) the "d" is positioned in an inclined position. Thank you very much. Now I have added the "d" as a vertical position.
â Sebastiano
Aug 8 at 21:25
1
1
@Sebatiano: ... you say they do operators in "italics"? ... What a word game though :-) As far as I was taught, operators should be upright, independent from which country they come along ... Maybe I was taught wrong or it is just a matter of "personal style"
â Jürgen G
Aug 8 at 21:32
@Sebatiano: ... you say they do operators in "italics"? ... What a word game though :-) As far as I was taught, operators should be upright, independent from which country they come along ... Maybe I was taught wrong or it is just a matter of "personal style"
â Jürgen G
Aug 8 at 21:32
1
1
I could see you now provide the "operator" version. +1 though!!!
â Jürgen G
Aug 8 at 21:34
I could see you now provide the "operator" version. +1 though!!!
â Jürgen G
Aug 8 at 21:34
@JürgenG Look here to pag. 5: dm.unibo.it/~barozzi/MI2/PDF/MI2-Cap.8.pdf. It is only an example.
â Sebastiano
Aug 8 at 21:35
@JürgenG Look here to pag. 5: dm.unibo.it/~barozzi/MI2/PDF/MI2-Cap.8.pdf. It is only an example.
â Sebastiano
Aug 8 at 21:35
 |Â
show 2 more comments
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f445153%2fhow-to-write-this-expression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
Are answers to this question what you're after?
â Dai Bowen
Aug 8 at 13:57