Can I have some help on a Calc. Optimization Problem? [closed]
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
A standard $8.5$ inches by $11$ inches piece of paper is folded so that one corner touches the opposite long side and the crease runs from the adjacent short side to the other long side, as shown in the picture below. What is the minimum length of the crease?
So I know this problem involves a lot of Calculus and Optimization, but I'm really lost to be completely honest. Any help or hints would be super helpful! Thanks!
calculus geometry derivatives optimization
closed as off-topic by amWhy, Jendrik Stelzner, Leucippus, Xander Henderson, Key Flex Aug 9 at 2:22
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." â amWhy, Jendrik Stelzner, Leucippus, Xander Henderson, Key Flex
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
A standard $8.5$ inches by $11$ inches piece of paper is folded so that one corner touches the opposite long side and the crease runs from the adjacent short side to the other long side, as shown in the picture below. What is the minimum length of the crease?
So I know this problem involves a lot of Calculus and Optimization, but I'm really lost to be completely honest. Any help or hints would be super helpful! Thanks!
calculus geometry derivatives optimization
closed as off-topic by amWhy, Jendrik Stelzner, Leucippus, Xander Henderson, Key Flex Aug 9 at 2:22
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." â amWhy, Jendrik Stelzner, Leucippus, Xander Henderson, Key Flex
Can you edit the picture highlighting exactly what part is the crease?
â Aaron Quitta
Aug 8 at 18:25
@Aaron Quitta the grey part of the paper is the folded crease. Sorry for any confusion!
â mathperson1234
Aug 8 at 18:34
The modeling seems to be my main problem, I'll get back to you once I've done that.
â Aaron Quitta
Aug 8 at 19:00
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
A standard $8.5$ inches by $11$ inches piece of paper is folded so that one corner touches the opposite long side and the crease runs from the adjacent short side to the other long side, as shown in the picture below. What is the minimum length of the crease?
So I know this problem involves a lot of Calculus and Optimization, but I'm really lost to be completely honest. Any help or hints would be super helpful! Thanks!
calculus geometry derivatives optimization
A standard $8.5$ inches by $11$ inches piece of paper is folded so that one corner touches the opposite long side and the crease runs from the adjacent short side to the other long side, as shown in the picture below. What is the minimum length of the crease?
So I know this problem involves a lot of Calculus and Optimization, but I'm really lost to be completely honest. Any help or hints would be super helpful! Thanks!
calculus geometry derivatives optimization
asked Aug 8 at 18:21
mathperson1234
314
314
closed as off-topic by amWhy, Jendrik Stelzner, Leucippus, Xander Henderson, Key Flex Aug 9 at 2:22
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." â amWhy, Jendrik Stelzner, Leucippus, Xander Henderson, Key Flex
closed as off-topic by amWhy, Jendrik Stelzner, Leucippus, Xander Henderson, Key Flex Aug 9 at 2:22
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." â amWhy, Jendrik Stelzner, Leucippus, Xander Henderson, Key Flex
Can you edit the picture highlighting exactly what part is the crease?
â Aaron Quitta
Aug 8 at 18:25
@Aaron Quitta the grey part of the paper is the folded crease. Sorry for any confusion!
â mathperson1234
Aug 8 at 18:34
The modeling seems to be my main problem, I'll get back to you once I've done that.
â Aaron Quitta
Aug 8 at 19:00
add a comment |Â
Can you edit the picture highlighting exactly what part is the crease?
â Aaron Quitta
Aug 8 at 18:25
@Aaron Quitta the grey part of the paper is the folded crease. Sorry for any confusion!
â mathperson1234
Aug 8 at 18:34
The modeling seems to be my main problem, I'll get back to you once I've done that.
â Aaron Quitta
Aug 8 at 19:00
Can you edit the picture highlighting exactly what part is the crease?
â Aaron Quitta
Aug 8 at 18:25
Can you edit the picture highlighting exactly what part is the crease?
â Aaron Quitta
Aug 8 at 18:25
@Aaron Quitta the grey part of the paper is the folded crease. Sorry for any confusion!
â mathperson1234
Aug 8 at 18:34
@Aaron Quitta the grey part of the paper is the folded crease. Sorry for any confusion!
â mathperson1234
Aug 8 at 18:34
The modeling seems to be my main problem, I'll get back to you once I've done that.
â Aaron Quitta
Aug 8 at 19:00
The modeling seems to be my main problem, I'll get back to you once I've done that.
â Aaron Quitta
Aug 8 at 19:00
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
As you can see in the figure above, $AC$ is the crease you are looking for. By superimposing, we observe that triangles $ACD $ and $ACB$ are congruent. Therefore
let $angle DAC = angle BAC = alpha$.
Let $AB = y , BC = x$
Then we have $x = y tan alphaquad$(see triangle $ABC$)
and $ quad y sin 2alpha = EB = 8.5$
Note that $y$ will vary continuously from $11$ inches to the lower limit of $y = 8.5.$
We want to minimise crease $AC$, i.e. to minimise $x^2 + y^2 = y^2(tan^2 alpha + 1) = big(frac8.5sin 2 alphabig)^2big( tan^2 alpha + 1 big)$, which is a function of $alpha$.
I hope you can proceed now using calculus to find minima.
You have to minimise $dfrac1sin^2 2 alpha cos^2 alpha =bigg(dfrac2cos 2 alpha + 1bigg)bigg(dfrac11-cos^2 2 alphabigg) = bigg(dfrac2(1-t^2)(1+t)bigg) = bigg(dfrac2(1-t)(1+t)^2bigg) ... (1)$,
where $t = cos 2 alpha$.
Note that $t$ can't be $1$ as $alpha neq 0 $, so expression is well defined.
I leave it as an exercise to prove that this has minima at $t = frac13$, and minima of above expression $(1)$ is $approx 1.687$.
Thus the final answer is $big(8.5^2 times 1.687big)^0.5 approx 11.04 $ inches.
Here is a graph of the function to verify the minima.
I think I do... it requires using the second derivative, am I correct? What exactly do I need to do in order to find the minima? Thank you for your help thus far!
â mathperson1234
Aug 8 at 21:32
1
Sorry for not I coming up with an answer for you I got distracted. Wherever the second derivative is equal to zero a minuim is also located.
â Aaron Quitta
Aug 8 at 23:08
@mathperson1234 I have now added the complete solution
â ab123
Aug 9 at 5:44
@ab123 In line 3, $y,sinalpha ne BC ne x$. The right angle must be CDA. Your arithmetic is correct, but the set up should be $x^2+y^2=fracy^2cos^2alpha$ Now go thru similar techniques and you will get a different answer.
â Narlin
Aug 9 at 15:27
@Narlin Thanks, I have corrected it now.
â ab123
Aug 9 at 16:32
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Since $a^2+b^2=crease^2$ we can minimize $a^2+b^2$ rather than its square root. Using the Lagrange multiplier method, $a^2+b^2$ will be the expression. From the lower right triangle, we can see that $c^2+(8.5-b)^2=b^2.$ That equation can be a constraint, but we added a variable (variable c) and we must have a constraint for every variable after the first one. So we need another constraint. Looking at the left edge, we can see that there is a right triangle with $8.5$ as one edge (dotted green) and $11-(11-a)-c$ as the base. So a second constraint can be $(a-c)^2+8.5^2=a^2.$
$$mathscrL(a,b,c,lambda_1,lambda_2)=a^2+b^2-lambda_1(c^2+(8.5-b)^2-b^2)-lambda_2left((a-c)^2+8.5^2-a^2right)$$
$$nablamathscrL=left(beginarrayc 2;c;lambda_2+2a\ 2;b+17;lambda_1\ -2;c;lambda_1+2;lambda_2;left(a-cright)\ b^2-c^2-left(-b+frac172right)^2\ 2ac-c^2-frac2894 endarrayright)=mathbf0$$
Solve these simultaneously and keep the positive values for $a$ and $b.$ $a=51sqrt2/8$ and $b=51/8.$ Therefore, $$Crease= sqrta^2+b^2approx 11.0418$$
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
As you can see in the figure above, $AC$ is the crease you are looking for. By superimposing, we observe that triangles $ACD $ and $ACB$ are congruent. Therefore
let $angle DAC = angle BAC = alpha$.
Let $AB = y , BC = x$
Then we have $x = y tan alphaquad$(see triangle $ABC$)
and $ quad y sin 2alpha = EB = 8.5$
Note that $y$ will vary continuously from $11$ inches to the lower limit of $y = 8.5.$
We want to minimise crease $AC$, i.e. to minimise $x^2 + y^2 = y^2(tan^2 alpha + 1) = big(frac8.5sin 2 alphabig)^2big( tan^2 alpha + 1 big)$, which is a function of $alpha$.
I hope you can proceed now using calculus to find minima.
You have to minimise $dfrac1sin^2 2 alpha cos^2 alpha =bigg(dfrac2cos 2 alpha + 1bigg)bigg(dfrac11-cos^2 2 alphabigg) = bigg(dfrac2(1-t^2)(1+t)bigg) = bigg(dfrac2(1-t)(1+t)^2bigg) ... (1)$,
where $t = cos 2 alpha$.
Note that $t$ can't be $1$ as $alpha neq 0 $, so expression is well defined.
I leave it as an exercise to prove that this has minima at $t = frac13$, and minima of above expression $(1)$ is $approx 1.687$.
Thus the final answer is $big(8.5^2 times 1.687big)^0.5 approx 11.04 $ inches.
Here is a graph of the function to verify the minima.
I think I do... it requires using the second derivative, am I correct? What exactly do I need to do in order to find the minima? Thank you for your help thus far!
â mathperson1234
Aug 8 at 21:32
1
Sorry for not I coming up with an answer for you I got distracted. Wherever the second derivative is equal to zero a minuim is also located.
â Aaron Quitta
Aug 8 at 23:08
@mathperson1234 I have now added the complete solution
â ab123
Aug 9 at 5:44
@ab123 In line 3, $y,sinalpha ne BC ne x$. The right angle must be CDA. Your arithmetic is correct, but the set up should be $x^2+y^2=fracy^2cos^2alpha$ Now go thru similar techniques and you will get a different answer.
â Narlin
Aug 9 at 15:27
@Narlin Thanks, I have corrected it now.
â ab123
Aug 9 at 16:32
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
As you can see in the figure above, $AC$ is the crease you are looking for. By superimposing, we observe that triangles $ACD $ and $ACB$ are congruent. Therefore
let $angle DAC = angle BAC = alpha$.
Let $AB = y , BC = x$
Then we have $x = y tan alphaquad$(see triangle $ABC$)
and $ quad y sin 2alpha = EB = 8.5$
Note that $y$ will vary continuously from $11$ inches to the lower limit of $y = 8.5.$
We want to minimise crease $AC$, i.e. to minimise $x^2 + y^2 = y^2(tan^2 alpha + 1) = big(frac8.5sin 2 alphabig)^2big( tan^2 alpha + 1 big)$, which is a function of $alpha$.
I hope you can proceed now using calculus to find minima.
You have to minimise $dfrac1sin^2 2 alpha cos^2 alpha =bigg(dfrac2cos 2 alpha + 1bigg)bigg(dfrac11-cos^2 2 alphabigg) = bigg(dfrac2(1-t^2)(1+t)bigg) = bigg(dfrac2(1-t)(1+t)^2bigg) ... (1)$,
where $t = cos 2 alpha$.
Note that $t$ can't be $1$ as $alpha neq 0 $, so expression is well defined.
I leave it as an exercise to prove that this has minima at $t = frac13$, and minima of above expression $(1)$ is $approx 1.687$.
Thus the final answer is $big(8.5^2 times 1.687big)^0.5 approx 11.04 $ inches.
Here is a graph of the function to verify the minima.
I think I do... it requires using the second derivative, am I correct? What exactly do I need to do in order to find the minima? Thank you for your help thus far!
â mathperson1234
Aug 8 at 21:32
1
Sorry for not I coming up with an answer for you I got distracted. Wherever the second derivative is equal to zero a minuim is also located.
â Aaron Quitta
Aug 8 at 23:08
@mathperson1234 I have now added the complete solution
â ab123
Aug 9 at 5:44
@ab123 In line 3, $y,sinalpha ne BC ne x$. The right angle must be CDA. Your arithmetic is correct, but the set up should be $x^2+y^2=fracy^2cos^2alpha$ Now go thru similar techniques and you will get a different answer.
â Narlin
Aug 9 at 15:27
@Narlin Thanks, I have corrected it now.
â ab123
Aug 9 at 16:32
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
As you can see in the figure above, $AC$ is the crease you are looking for. By superimposing, we observe that triangles $ACD $ and $ACB$ are congruent. Therefore
let $angle DAC = angle BAC = alpha$.
Let $AB = y , BC = x$
Then we have $x = y tan alphaquad$(see triangle $ABC$)
and $ quad y sin 2alpha = EB = 8.5$
Note that $y$ will vary continuously from $11$ inches to the lower limit of $y = 8.5.$
We want to minimise crease $AC$, i.e. to minimise $x^2 + y^2 = y^2(tan^2 alpha + 1) = big(frac8.5sin 2 alphabig)^2big( tan^2 alpha + 1 big)$, which is a function of $alpha$.
I hope you can proceed now using calculus to find minima.
You have to minimise $dfrac1sin^2 2 alpha cos^2 alpha =bigg(dfrac2cos 2 alpha + 1bigg)bigg(dfrac11-cos^2 2 alphabigg) = bigg(dfrac2(1-t^2)(1+t)bigg) = bigg(dfrac2(1-t)(1+t)^2bigg) ... (1)$,
where $t = cos 2 alpha$.
Note that $t$ can't be $1$ as $alpha neq 0 $, so expression is well defined.
I leave it as an exercise to prove that this has minima at $t = frac13$, and minima of above expression $(1)$ is $approx 1.687$.
Thus the final answer is $big(8.5^2 times 1.687big)^0.5 approx 11.04 $ inches.
Here is a graph of the function to verify the minima.
As you can see in the figure above, $AC$ is the crease you are looking for. By superimposing, we observe that triangles $ACD $ and $ACB$ are congruent. Therefore
let $angle DAC = angle BAC = alpha$.
Let $AB = y , BC = x$
Then we have $x = y tan alphaquad$(see triangle $ABC$)
and $ quad y sin 2alpha = EB = 8.5$
Note that $y$ will vary continuously from $11$ inches to the lower limit of $y = 8.5.$
We want to minimise crease $AC$, i.e. to minimise $x^2 + y^2 = y^2(tan^2 alpha + 1) = big(frac8.5sin 2 alphabig)^2big( tan^2 alpha + 1 big)$, which is a function of $alpha$.
I hope you can proceed now using calculus to find minima.
You have to minimise $dfrac1sin^2 2 alpha cos^2 alpha =bigg(dfrac2cos 2 alpha + 1bigg)bigg(dfrac11-cos^2 2 alphabigg) = bigg(dfrac2(1-t^2)(1+t)bigg) = bigg(dfrac2(1-t)(1+t)^2bigg) ... (1)$,
where $t = cos 2 alpha$.
Note that $t$ can't be $1$ as $alpha neq 0 $, so expression is well defined.
I leave it as an exercise to prove that this has minima at $t = frac13$, and minima of above expression $(1)$ is $approx 1.687$.
Thus the final answer is $big(8.5^2 times 1.687big)^0.5 approx 11.04 $ inches.
Here is a graph of the function to verify the minima.
edited Aug 9 at 16:29
answered Aug 8 at 20:08
ab123
1,344319
1,344319
I think I do... it requires using the second derivative, am I correct? What exactly do I need to do in order to find the minima? Thank you for your help thus far!
â mathperson1234
Aug 8 at 21:32
1
Sorry for not I coming up with an answer for you I got distracted. Wherever the second derivative is equal to zero a minuim is also located.
â Aaron Quitta
Aug 8 at 23:08
@mathperson1234 I have now added the complete solution
â ab123
Aug 9 at 5:44
@ab123 In line 3, $y,sinalpha ne BC ne x$. The right angle must be CDA. Your arithmetic is correct, but the set up should be $x^2+y^2=fracy^2cos^2alpha$ Now go thru similar techniques and you will get a different answer.
â Narlin
Aug 9 at 15:27
@Narlin Thanks, I have corrected it now.
â ab123
Aug 9 at 16:32
add a comment |Â
I think I do... it requires using the second derivative, am I correct? What exactly do I need to do in order to find the minima? Thank you for your help thus far!
â mathperson1234
Aug 8 at 21:32
1
Sorry for not I coming up with an answer for you I got distracted. Wherever the second derivative is equal to zero a minuim is also located.
â Aaron Quitta
Aug 8 at 23:08
@mathperson1234 I have now added the complete solution
â ab123
Aug 9 at 5:44
@ab123 In line 3, $y,sinalpha ne BC ne x$. The right angle must be CDA. Your arithmetic is correct, but the set up should be $x^2+y^2=fracy^2cos^2alpha$ Now go thru similar techniques and you will get a different answer.
â Narlin
Aug 9 at 15:27
@Narlin Thanks, I have corrected it now.
â ab123
Aug 9 at 16:32
I think I do... it requires using the second derivative, am I correct? What exactly do I need to do in order to find the minima? Thank you for your help thus far!
â mathperson1234
Aug 8 at 21:32
I think I do... it requires using the second derivative, am I correct? What exactly do I need to do in order to find the minima? Thank you for your help thus far!
â mathperson1234
Aug 8 at 21:32
1
1
Sorry for not I coming up with an answer for you I got distracted. Wherever the second derivative is equal to zero a minuim is also located.
â Aaron Quitta
Aug 8 at 23:08
Sorry for not I coming up with an answer for you I got distracted. Wherever the second derivative is equal to zero a minuim is also located.
â Aaron Quitta
Aug 8 at 23:08
@mathperson1234 I have now added the complete solution
â ab123
Aug 9 at 5:44
@mathperson1234 I have now added the complete solution
â ab123
Aug 9 at 5:44
@ab123 In line 3, $y,sinalpha ne BC ne x$. The right angle must be CDA. Your arithmetic is correct, but the set up should be $x^2+y^2=fracy^2cos^2alpha$ Now go thru similar techniques and you will get a different answer.
â Narlin
Aug 9 at 15:27
@ab123 In line 3, $y,sinalpha ne BC ne x$. The right angle must be CDA. Your arithmetic is correct, but the set up should be $x^2+y^2=fracy^2cos^2alpha$ Now go thru similar techniques and you will get a different answer.
â Narlin
Aug 9 at 15:27
@Narlin Thanks, I have corrected it now.
â ab123
Aug 9 at 16:32
@Narlin Thanks, I have corrected it now.
â ab123
Aug 9 at 16:32
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Since $a^2+b^2=crease^2$ we can minimize $a^2+b^2$ rather than its square root. Using the Lagrange multiplier method, $a^2+b^2$ will be the expression. From the lower right triangle, we can see that $c^2+(8.5-b)^2=b^2.$ That equation can be a constraint, but we added a variable (variable c) and we must have a constraint for every variable after the first one. So we need another constraint. Looking at the left edge, we can see that there is a right triangle with $8.5$ as one edge (dotted green) and $11-(11-a)-c$ as the base. So a second constraint can be $(a-c)^2+8.5^2=a^2.$
$$mathscrL(a,b,c,lambda_1,lambda_2)=a^2+b^2-lambda_1(c^2+(8.5-b)^2-b^2)-lambda_2left((a-c)^2+8.5^2-a^2right)$$
$$nablamathscrL=left(beginarrayc 2;c;lambda_2+2a\ 2;b+17;lambda_1\ -2;c;lambda_1+2;lambda_2;left(a-cright)\ b^2-c^2-left(-b+frac172right)^2\ 2ac-c^2-frac2894 endarrayright)=mathbf0$$
Solve these simultaneously and keep the positive values for $a$ and $b.$ $a=51sqrt2/8$ and $b=51/8.$ Therefore, $$Crease= sqrta^2+b^2approx 11.0418$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Since $a^2+b^2=crease^2$ we can minimize $a^2+b^2$ rather than its square root. Using the Lagrange multiplier method, $a^2+b^2$ will be the expression. From the lower right triangle, we can see that $c^2+(8.5-b)^2=b^2.$ That equation can be a constraint, but we added a variable (variable c) and we must have a constraint for every variable after the first one. So we need another constraint. Looking at the left edge, we can see that there is a right triangle with $8.5$ as one edge (dotted green) and $11-(11-a)-c$ as the base. So a second constraint can be $(a-c)^2+8.5^2=a^2.$
$$mathscrL(a,b,c,lambda_1,lambda_2)=a^2+b^2-lambda_1(c^2+(8.5-b)^2-b^2)-lambda_2left((a-c)^2+8.5^2-a^2right)$$
$$nablamathscrL=left(beginarrayc 2;c;lambda_2+2a\ 2;b+17;lambda_1\ -2;c;lambda_1+2;lambda_2;left(a-cright)\ b^2-c^2-left(-b+frac172right)^2\ 2ac-c^2-frac2894 endarrayright)=mathbf0$$
Solve these simultaneously and keep the positive values for $a$ and $b.$ $a=51sqrt2/8$ and $b=51/8.$ Therefore, $$Crease= sqrta^2+b^2approx 11.0418$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Since $a^2+b^2=crease^2$ we can minimize $a^2+b^2$ rather than its square root. Using the Lagrange multiplier method, $a^2+b^2$ will be the expression. From the lower right triangle, we can see that $c^2+(8.5-b)^2=b^2.$ That equation can be a constraint, but we added a variable (variable c) and we must have a constraint for every variable after the first one. So we need another constraint. Looking at the left edge, we can see that there is a right triangle with $8.5$ as one edge (dotted green) and $11-(11-a)-c$ as the base. So a second constraint can be $(a-c)^2+8.5^2=a^2.$
$$mathscrL(a,b,c,lambda_1,lambda_2)=a^2+b^2-lambda_1(c^2+(8.5-b)^2-b^2)-lambda_2left((a-c)^2+8.5^2-a^2right)$$
$$nablamathscrL=left(beginarrayc 2;c;lambda_2+2a\ 2;b+17;lambda_1\ -2;c;lambda_1+2;lambda_2;left(a-cright)\ b^2-c^2-left(-b+frac172right)^2\ 2ac-c^2-frac2894 endarrayright)=mathbf0$$
Solve these simultaneously and keep the positive values for $a$ and $b.$ $a=51sqrt2/8$ and $b=51/8.$ Therefore, $$Crease= sqrta^2+b^2approx 11.0418$$
Since $a^2+b^2=crease^2$ we can minimize $a^2+b^2$ rather than its square root. Using the Lagrange multiplier method, $a^2+b^2$ will be the expression. From the lower right triangle, we can see that $c^2+(8.5-b)^2=b^2.$ That equation can be a constraint, but we added a variable (variable c) and we must have a constraint for every variable after the first one. So we need another constraint. Looking at the left edge, we can see that there is a right triangle with $8.5$ as one edge (dotted green) and $11-(11-a)-c$ as the base. So a second constraint can be $(a-c)^2+8.5^2=a^2.$
$$mathscrL(a,b,c,lambda_1,lambda_2)=a^2+b^2-lambda_1(c^2+(8.5-b)^2-b^2)-lambda_2left((a-c)^2+8.5^2-a^2right)$$
$$nablamathscrL=left(beginarrayc 2;c;lambda_2+2a\ 2;b+17;lambda_1\ -2;c;lambda_1+2;lambda_2;left(a-cright)\ b^2-c^2-left(-b+frac172right)^2\ 2ac-c^2-frac2894 endarrayright)=mathbf0$$
Solve these simultaneously and keep the positive values for $a$ and $b.$ $a=51sqrt2/8$ and $b=51/8.$ Therefore, $$Crease= sqrta^2+b^2approx 11.0418$$
answered Aug 9 at 1:04
Narlin
368110
368110
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Can you edit the picture highlighting exactly what part is the crease?
â Aaron Quitta
Aug 8 at 18:25
@Aaron Quitta the grey part of the paper is the folded crease. Sorry for any confusion!
â mathperson1234
Aug 8 at 18:34
The modeling seems to be my main problem, I'll get back to you once I've done that.
â Aaron Quitta
Aug 8 at 19:00