Find the line $y= x+lambda d$ for $(n-1)times n$ linear system of equations

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Consider the equations
$$sum_j=1^n a_ijx_j = b_i, i = 1,cdots, n-1$$
or equivalently, $Ax = b$ with $Ain mathbbR^(n-1)times n, bin
mathbbR^n-1$ and $xin mathbbR^n$ corresponding to $n-1$
linearly independent hyperplanes. The intersection of these
hyperplanes gives a line in $mathbbR^n$ in the form
$$y = x + lambda d$$
with $lambdain mathbbR$ and $x,dinmathbbR^n$. Find how to
chose $x$ and $d$.
I did an example of a system of two equations:
$$2x+3y+5z = 1$$
$$4x+y+8z=3$$
The intersection turned out to be
$$20x+42z=14$$
It's a line in $mathbbR^3$. But I can't see it in the way the exercise asks be to. I understand that I will always get a line, but how do I convert this line equation in the form the exercise asks?
linear-algebra systems-of-equations
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Consider the equations
$$sum_j=1^n a_ijx_j = b_i, i = 1,cdots, n-1$$
or equivalently, $Ax = b$ with $Ain mathbbR^(n-1)times n, bin
mathbbR^n-1$ and $xin mathbbR^n$ corresponding to $n-1$
linearly independent hyperplanes. The intersection of these
hyperplanes gives a line in $mathbbR^n$ in the form
$$y = x + lambda d$$
with $lambdain mathbbR$ and $x,dinmathbbR^n$. Find how to
chose $x$ and $d$.
I did an example of a system of two equations:
$$2x+3y+5z = 1$$
$$4x+y+8z=3$$
The intersection turned out to be
$$20x+42z=14$$
It's a line in $mathbbR^3$. But I can't see it in the way the exercise asks be to. I understand that I will always get a line, but how do I convert this line equation in the form the exercise asks?
linear-algebra systems-of-equations
You should double-check your work in your example. $20x+42z=4$ is the equation of a plane, not a line. Moreover, its intersection with the original two planes is a single point, so it doesnâÂÂt even contain their line of intersection.
â amd
Aug 8 at 19:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Consider the equations
$$sum_j=1^n a_ijx_j = b_i, i = 1,cdots, n-1$$
or equivalently, $Ax = b$ with $Ain mathbbR^(n-1)times n, bin
mathbbR^n-1$ and $xin mathbbR^n$ corresponding to $n-1$
linearly independent hyperplanes. The intersection of these
hyperplanes gives a line in $mathbbR^n$ in the form
$$y = x + lambda d$$
with $lambdain mathbbR$ and $x,dinmathbbR^n$. Find how to
chose $x$ and $d$.
I did an example of a system of two equations:
$$2x+3y+5z = 1$$
$$4x+y+8z=3$$
The intersection turned out to be
$$20x+42z=14$$
It's a line in $mathbbR^3$. But I can't see it in the way the exercise asks be to. I understand that I will always get a line, but how do I convert this line equation in the form the exercise asks?
linear-algebra systems-of-equations
Consider the equations
$$sum_j=1^n a_ijx_j = b_i, i = 1,cdots, n-1$$
or equivalently, $Ax = b$ with $Ain mathbbR^(n-1)times n, bin
mathbbR^n-1$ and $xin mathbbR^n$ corresponding to $n-1$
linearly independent hyperplanes. The intersection of these
hyperplanes gives a line in $mathbbR^n$ in the form
$$y = x + lambda d$$
with $lambdain mathbbR$ and $x,dinmathbbR^n$. Find how to
chose $x$ and $d$.
I did an example of a system of two equations:
$$2x+3y+5z = 1$$
$$4x+y+8z=3$$
The intersection turned out to be
$$20x+42z=14$$
It's a line in $mathbbR^3$. But I can't see it in the way the exercise asks be to. I understand that I will always get a line, but how do I convert this line equation in the form the exercise asks?
linear-algebra systems-of-equations
edited Aug 8 at 16:49
paf
3,9391823
3,9391823
asked Aug 8 at 15:04
Guerlando OCs
43121144
43121144
You should double-check your work in your example. $20x+42z=4$ is the equation of a plane, not a line. Moreover, its intersection with the original two planes is a single point, so it doesnâÂÂt even contain their line of intersection.
â amd
Aug 8 at 19:26
add a comment |Â
You should double-check your work in your example. $20x+42z=4$ is the equation of a plane, not a line. Moreover, its intersection with the original two planes is a single point, so it doesnâÂÂt even contain their line of intersection.
â amd
Aug 8 at 19:26
You should double-check your work in your example. $20x+42z=4$ is the equation of a plane, not a line. Moreover, its intersection with the original two planes is a single point, so it doesnâÂÂt even contain their line of intersection.
â amd
Aug 8 at 19:26
You should double-check your work in your example. $20x+42z=4$ is the equation of a plane, not a line. Moreover, its intersection with the original two planes is a single point, so it doesnâÂÂt even contain their line of intersection.
â amd
Aug 8 at 19:26
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
I will work with the example you have given. First, note that your solution is not correct. You can see this easily, as it doesn't describe a line, but a plane(you have freedom in the $y$-direction).
The way of specifying a line as
$$x+lambda d$$
is called parametrization(as all solutions can be obtained using some value for the parameter $lambda$).
Let's first look at the real solution set, the said line, and how to obtain a parameterized solution right away. Taking your system of equations
$$beginpmatrix2 &3 &5\4 &1 &8endpmatrixbeginpmatrixx\y\zendpmatrix=beginpmatrix1\3endpmatrix$$
we may transform it using Gauss-Jordan elimination into
$$beginpmatrix2 &3 &5\0 &-5 &-2endpmatrixbeginpmatrixx\y\zendpmatrix=beginpmatrix1\1endpmatrix$$
We can now use back-substitution to determine the solutions, i.e. setting $z=c$ and determining the values of $x$ and $y$ in correspondence to $c$. You may then expand the solution vector, in the entries depending on $c$, to an equation $x+cy$ for vectors $x,y$ by pulling out the constants using vector addition and extracting $c$ using the laws of scalar multiplication.
Note, that you may convert the plane you've given as a supposed solution into a parametrized equation as well. For this, we just let $y=c,z=c'$ and can then determine $x$ in correspondence to $z$(and $y$ technically). Note, that as it is a plane, we've needed more parameters to describe the corresponding solutions.
In general, for a linear system of equations, for convenience given as $Ax=b$ for a corresponding coefficient matrix $A$ and solution vector $b$, the solution set $S(A,b)$, given a $xin S(A,b)$, can be specified as $x+S(A,mathbf0)=x+ymid yin S(A,mathbf0)$. The solution set $S(A,mathbf0)$ is commonly called the kernel of $A$. In other words, the solution set of an arbitrary system of equations $Ax=b$ can always be obtained by a linear shift of the solution set to the homogeneous system $Ax=mathbf0$ by any already found solution. I don't want to get into this too much, but I've already written an answer to a question asking what the solution space of a linear system is. It has slightly more depth so you might want to check this out.
In your case, the solution set $S(A,mathbf0)$ will always be a line(as the planes are linearly independent and you have $n-1$ of them, check this), i.e. a one-dimensional subspace of the underlying vector space. Now, as above, we can specify the general solution set $S(A,b)$ as $x+S(A,mathbf0)$ for an arbitrary $xin S(A,b)$. If $xneqmathbf0$(which happens iff $bneq 0$, check this as well), the set $S(A,b)$ is called an affine line, a linear shift of a linear subspace, as it does not contain the null vector anymore.
As $S(A,mathbf0)$ is always one dimensional, you may choose a one-element basis $d$ for $S(A,mathbf0)$. We may, given this basis, write
$$S(A,mathbf0)=lambda dmidlambdainmathbbR$$
as every element of $S(A,mathbf0)$ can be obtained as a linear combination of its basis and since it is one-dimensional, this just amounts to scalar multiplication. Thus
$$S(A,b)=x+S(A,mathbf0)=x+lambda dmidlambdainmathbbR$$
i.e. every element of $S(A,b)$ may be written as $x+lambda d$. Thus, to answer your question more generally, $x$ and $d$ in the specification of your line of solutions always correspond to any already found solution and to a non-null solution to the equation $Ax=mathbf0$ respectively. This solution will automatically be a basis as above, as the space is only $1$-dimensional.
For some further investigations, you may try to generalize these results, e.g. can you always describe a solution set to a linear system of equations as such a parametric equation, etc.
Very good answer. After your Gaussian elimination, the $-3$ should be $-5$, right?
â paf
Aug 8 at 16:53
Oh yes, thank you very much. I'll add it in.
â zzuussee
Aug 8 at 16:55
I'm confused. I should find a line or a plane in the solution? Could you write that out for me?
â Guerlando OCs
Aug 8 at 19:43
@GuerlandoOCs Your intersection, the one that you've found, is wrong. You have $n-1$ linearly independent planes intersecting each other. This intersection always is a (affine) line. So in this special case, you should find a line.
â zzuussee
Aug 8 at 19:46
If I don't suppose a $c$ for $z$ then i end up with a plane of all the possible lines, i guess then. If I fix a $z$ then i can find a line and use two points of this line to find a direction vector and a starting point, am i right?
â Guerlando OCs
Aug 8 at 19:47
 |Â
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
I will work with the example you have given. First, note that your solution is not correct. You can see this easily, as it doesn't describe a line, but a plane(you have freedom in the $y$-direction).
The way of specifying a line as
$$x+lambda d$$
is called parametrization(as all solutions can be obtained using some value for the parameter $lambda$).
Let's first look at the real solution set, the said line, and how to obtain a parameterized solution right away. Taking your system of equations
$$beginpmatrix2 &3 &5\4 &1 &8endpmatrixbeginpmatrixx\y\zendpmatrix=beginpmatrix1\3endpmatrix$$
we may transform it using Gauss-Jordan elimination into
$$beginpmatrix2 &3 &5\0 &-5 &-2endpmatrixbeginpmatrixx\y\zendpmatrix=beginpmatrix1\1endpmatrix$$
We can now use back-substitution to determine the solutions, i.e. setting $z=c$ and determining the values of $x$ and $y$ in correspondence to $c$. You may then expand the solution vector, in the entries depending on $c$, to an equation $x+cy$ for vectors $x,y$ by pulling out the constants using vector addition and extracting $c$ using the laws of scalar multiplication.
Note, that you may convert the plane you've given as a supposed solution into a parametrized equation as well. For this, we just let $y=c,z=c'$ and can then determine $x$ in correspondence to $z$(and $y$ technically). Note, that as it is a plane, we've needed more parameters to describe the corresponding solutions.
In general, for a linear system of equations, for convenience given as $Ax=b$ for a corresponding coefficient matrix $A$ and solution vector $b$, the solution set $S(A,b)$, given a $xin S(A,b)$, can be specified as $x+S(A,mathbf0)=x+ymid yin S(A,mathbf0)$. The solution set $S(A,mathbf0)$ is commonly called the kernel of $A$. In other words, the solution set of an arbitrary system of equations $Ax=b$ can always be obtained by a linear shift of the solution set to the homogeneous system $Ax=mathbf0$ by any already found solution. I don't want to get into this too much, but I've already written an answer to a question asking what the solution space of a linear system is. It has slightly more depth so you might want to check this out.
In your case, the solution set $S(A,mathbf0)$ will always be a line(as the planes are linearly independent and you have $n-1$ of them, check this), i.e. a one-dimensional subspace of the underlying vector space. Now, as above, we can specify the general solution set $S(A,b)$ as $x+S(A,mathbf0)$ for an arbitrary $xin S(A,b)$. If $xneqmathbf0$(which happens iff $bneq 0$, check this as well), the set $S(A,b)$ is called an affine line, a linear shift of a linear subspace, as it does not contain the null vector anymore.
As $S(A,mathbf0)$ is always one dimensional, you may choose a one-element basis $d$ for $S(A,mathbf0)$. We may, given this basis, write
$$S(A,mathbf0)=lambda dmidlambdainmathbbR$$
as every element of $S(A,mathbf0)$ can be obtained as a linear combination of its basis and since it is one-dimensional, this just amounts to scalar multiplication. Thus
$$S(A,b)=x+S(A,mathbf0)=x+lambda dmidlambdainmathbbR$$
i.e. every element of $S(A,b)$ may be written as $x+lambda d$. Thus, to answer your question more generally, $x$ and $d$ in the specification of your line of solutions always correspond to any already found solution and to a non-null solution to the equation $Ax=mathbf0$ respectively. This solution will automatically be a basis as above, as the space is only $1$-dimensional.
For some further investigations, you may try to generalize these results, e.g. can you always describe a solution set to a linear system of equations as such a parametric equation, etc.
Very good answer. After your Gaussian elimination, the $-3$ should be $-5$, right?
â paf
Aug 8 at 16:53
Oh yes, thank you very much. I'll add it in.
â zzuussee
Aug 8 at 16:55
I'm confused. I should find a line or a plane in the solution? Could you write that out for me?
â Guerlando OCs
Aug 8 at 19:43
@GuerlandoOCs Your intersection, the one that you've found, is wrong. You have $n-1$ linearly independent planes intersecting each other. This intersection always is a (affine) line. So in this special case, you should find a line.
â zzuussee
Aug 8 at 19:46
If I don't suppose a $c$ for $z$ then i end up with a plane of all the possible lines, i guess then. If I fix a $z$ then i can find a line and use two points of this line to find a direction vector and a starting point, am i right?
â Guerlando OCs
Aug 8 at 19:47
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
I will work with the example you have given. First, note that your solution is not correct. You can see this easily, as it doesn't describe a line, but a plane(you have freedom in the $y$-direction).
The way of specifying a line as
$$x+lambda d$$
is called parametrization(as all solutions can be obtained using some value for the parameter $lambda$).
Let's first look at the real solution set, the said line, and how to obtain a parameterized solution right away. Taking your system of equations
$$beginpmatrix2 &3 &5\4 &1 &8endpmatrixbeginpmatrixx\y\zendpmatrix=beginpmatrix1\3endpmatrix$$
we may transform it using Gauss-Jordan elimination into
$$beginpmatrix2 &3 &5\0 &-5 &-2endpmatrixbeginpmatrixx\y\zendpmatrix=beginpmatrix1\1endpmatrix$$
We can now use back-substitution to determine the solutions, i.e. setting $z=c$ and determining the values of $x$ and $y$ in correspondence to $c$. You may then expand the solution vector, in the entries depending on $c$, to an equation $x+cy$ for vectors $x,y$ by pulling out the constants using vector addition and extracting $c$ using the laws of scalar multiplication.
Note, that you may convert the plane you've given as a supposed solution into a parametrized equation as well. For this, we just let $y=c,z=c'$ and can then determine $x$ in correspondence to $z$(and $y$ technically). Note, that as it is a plane, we've needed more parameters to describe the corresponding solutions.
In general, for a linear system of equations, for convenience given as $Ax=b$ for a corresponding coefficient matrix $A$ and solution vector $b$, the solution set $S(A,b)$, given a $xin S(A,b)$, can be specified as $x+S(A,mathbf0)=x+ymid yin S(A,mathbf0)$. The solution set $S(A,mathbf0)$ is commonly called the kernel of $A$. In other words, the solution set of an arbitrary system of equations $Ax=b$ can always be obtained by a linear shift of the solution set to the homogeneous system $Ax=mathbf0$ by any already found solution. I don't want to get into this too much, but I've already written an answer to a question asking what the solution space of a linear system is. It has slightly more depth so you might want to check this out.
In your case, the solution set $S(A,mathbf0)$ will always be a line(as the planes are linearly independent and you have $n-1$ of them, check this), i.e. a one-dimensional subspace of the underlying vector space. Now, as above, we can specify the general solution set $S(A,b)$ as $x+S(A,mathbf0)$ for an arbitrary $xin S(A,b)$. If $xneqmathbf0$(which happens iff $bneq 0$, check this as well), the set $S(A,b)$ is called an affine line, a linear shift of a linear subspace, as it does not contain the null vector anymore.
As $S(A,mathbf0)$ is always one dimensional, you may choose a one-element basis $d$ for $S(A,mathbf0)$. We may, given this basis, write
$$S(A,mathbf0)=lambda dmidlambdainmathbbR$$
as every element of $S(A,mathbf0)$ can be obtained as a linear combination of its basis and since it is one-dimensional, this just amounts to scalar multiplication. Thus
$$S(A,b)=x+S(A,mathbf0)=x+lambda dmidlambdainmathbbR$$
i.e. every element of $S(A,b)$ may be written as $x+lambda d$. Thus, to answer your question more generally, $x$ and $d$ in the specification of your line of solutions always correspond to any already found solution and to a non-null solution to the equation $Ax=mathbf0$ respectively. This solution will automatically be a basis as above, as the space is only $1$-dimensional.
For some further investigations, you may try to generalize these results, e.g. can you always describe a solution set to a linear system of equations as such a parametric equation, etc.
Very good answer. After your Gaussian elimination, the $-3$ should be $-5$, right?
â paf
Aug 8 at 16:53
Oh yes, thank you very much. I'll add it in.
â zzuussee
Aug 8 at 16:55
I'm confused. I should find a line or a plane in the solution? Could you write that out for me?
â Guerlando OCs
Aug 8 at 19:43
@GuerlandoOCs Your intersection, the one that you've found, is wrong. You have $n-1$ linearly independent planes intersecting each other. This intersection always is a (affine) line. So in this special case, you should find a line.
â zzuussee
Aug 8 at 19:46
If I don't suppose a $c$ for $z$ then i end up with a plane of all the possible lines, i guess then. If I fix a $z$ then i can find a line and use two points of this line to find a direction vector and a starting point, am i right?
â Guerlando OCs
Aug 8 at 19:47
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
I will work with the example you have given. First, note that your solution is not correct. You can see this easily, as it doesn't describe a line, but a plane(you have freedom in the $y$-direction).
The way of specifying a line as
$$x+lambda d$$
is called parametrization(as all solutions can be obtained using some value for the parameter $lambda$).
Let's first look at the real solution set, the said line, and how to obtain a parameterized solution right away. Taking your system of equations
$$beginpmatrix2 &3 &5\4 &1 &8endpmatrixbeginpmatrixx\y\zendpmatrix=beginpmatrix1\3endpmatrix$$
we may transform it using Gauss-Jordan elimination into
$$beginpmatrix2 &3 &5\0 &-5 &-2endpmatrixbeginpmatrixx\y\zendpmatrix=beginpmatrix1\1endpmatrix$$
We can now use back-substitution to determine the solutions, i.e. setting $z=c$ and determining the values of $x$ and $y$ in correspondence to $c$. You may then expand the solution vector, in the entries depending on $c$, to an equation $x+cy$ for vectors $x,y$ by pulling out the constants using vector addition and extracting $c$ using the laws of scalar multiplication.
Note, that you may convert the plane you've given as a supposed solution into a parametrized equation as well. For this, we just let $y=c,z=c'$ and can then determine $x$ in correspondence to $z$(and $y$ technically). Note, that as it is a plane, we've needed more parameters to describe the corresponding solutions.
In general, for a linear system of equations, for convenience given as $Ax=b$ for a corresponding coefficient matrix $A$ and solution vector $b$, the solution set $S(A,b)$, given a $xin S(A,b)$, can be specified as $x+S(A,mathbf0)=x+ymid yin S(A,mathbf0)$. The solution set $S(A,mathbf0)$ is commonly called the kernel of $A$. In other words, the solution set of an arbitrary system of equations $Ax=b$ can always be obtained by a linear shift of the solution set to the homogeneous system $Ax=mathbf0$ by any already found solution. I don't want to get into this too much, but I've already written an answer to a question asking what the solution space of a linear system is. It has slightly more depth so you might want to check this out.
In your case, the solution set $S(A,mathbf0)$ will always be a line(as the planes are linearly independent and you have $n-1$ of them, check this), i.e. a one-dimensional subspace of the underlying vector space. Now, as above, we can specify the general solution set $S(A,b)$ as $x+S(A,mathbf0)$ for an arbitrary $xin S(A,b)$. If $xneqmathbf0$(which happens iff $bneq 0$, check this as well), the set $S(A,b)$ is called an affine line, a linear shift of a linear subspace, as it does not contain the null vector anymore.
As $S(A,mathbf0)$ is always one dimensional, you may choose a one-element basis $d$ for $S(A,mathbf0)$. We may, given this basis, write
$$S(A,mathbf0)=lambda dmidlambdainmathbbR$$
as every element of $S(A,mathbf0)$ can be obtained as a linear combination of its basis and since it is one-dimensional, this just amounts to scalar multiplication. Thus
$$S(A,b)=x+S(A,mathbf0)=x+lambda dmidlambdainmathbbR$$
i.e. every element of $S(A,b)$ may be written as $x+lambda d$. Thus, to answer your question more generally, $x$ and $d$ in the specification of your line of solutions always correspond to any already found solution and to a non-null solution to the equation $Ax=mathbf0$ respectively. This solution will automatically be a basis as above, as the space is only $1$-dimensional.
For some further investigations, you may try to generalize these results, e.g. can you always describe a solution set to a linear system of equations as such a parametric equation, etc.
I will work with the example you have given. First, note that your solution is not correct. You can see this easily, as it doesn't describe a line, but a plane(you have freedom in the $y$-direction).
The way of specifying a line as
$$x+lambda d$$
is called parametrization(as all solutions can be obtained using some value for the parameter $lambda$).
Let's first look at the real solution set, the said line, and how to obtain a parameterized solution right away. Taking your system of equations
$$beginpmatrix2 &3 &5\4 &1 &8endpmatrixbeginpmatrixx\y\zendpmatrix=beginpmatrix1\3endpmatrix$$
we may transform it using Gauss-Jordan elimination into
$$beginpmatrix2 &3 &5\0 &-5 &-2endpmatrixbeginpmatrixx\y\zendpmatrix=beginpmatrix1\1endpmatrix$$
We can now use back-substitution to determine the solutions, i.e. setting $z=c$ and determining the values of $x$ and $y$ in correspondence to $c$. You may then expand the solution vector, in the entries depending on $c$, to an equation $x+cy$ for vectors $x,y$ by pulling out the constants using vector addition and extracting $c$ using the laws of scalar multiplication.
Note, that you may convert the plane you've given as a supposed solution into a parametrized equation as well. For this, we just let $y=c,z=c'$ and can then determine $x$ in correspondence to $z$(and $y$ technically). Note, that as it is a plane, we've needed more parameters to describe the corresponding solutions.
In general, for a linear system of equations, for convenience given as $Ax=b$ for a corresponding coefficient matrix $A$ and solution vector $b$, the solution set $S(A,b)$, given a $xin S(A,b)$, can be specified as $x+S(A,mathbf0)=x+ymid yin S(A,mathbf0)$. The solution set $S(A,mathbf0)$ is commonly called the kernel of $A$. In other words, the solution set of an arbitrary system of equations $Ax=b$ can always be obtained by a linear shift of the solution set to the homogeneous system $Ax=mathbf0$ by any already found solution. I don't want to get into this too much, but I've already written an answer to a question asking what the solution space of a linear system is. It has slightly more depth so you might want to check this out.
In your case, the solution set $S(A,mathbf0)$ will always be a line(as the planes are linearly independent and you have $n-1$ of them, check this), i.e. a one-dimensional subspace of the underlying vector space. Now, as above, we can specify the general solution set $S(A,b)$ as $x+S(A,mathbf0)$ for an arbitrary $xin S(A,b)$. If $xneqmathbf0$(which happens iff $bneq 0$, check this as well), the set $S(A,b)$ is called an affine line, a linear shift of a linear subspace, as it does not contain the null vector anymore.
As $S(A,mathbf0)$ is always one dimensional, you may choose a one-element basis $d$ for $S(A,mathbf0)$. We may, given this basis, write
$$S(A,mathbf0)=lambda dmidlambdainmathbbR$$
as every element of $S(A,mathbf0)$ can be obtained as a linear combination of its basis and since it is one-dimensional, this just amounts to scalar multiplication. Thus
$$S(A,b)=x+S(A,mathbf0)=x+lambda dmidlambdainmathbbR$$
i.e. every element of $S(A,b)$ may be written as $x+lambda d$. Thus, to answer your question more generally, $x$ and $d$ in the specification of your line of solutions always correspond to any already found solution and to a non-null solution to the equation $Ax=mathbf0$ respectively. This solution will automatically be a basis as above, as the space is only $1$-dimensional.
For some further investigations, you may try to generalize these results, e.g. can you always describe a solution set to a linear system of equations as such a parametric equation, etc.
edited Aug 8 at 19:54
answered Aug 8 at 16:45
zzuussee
1,659420
1,659420
Very good answer. After your Gaussian elimination, the $-3$ should be $-5$, right?
â paf
Aug 8 at 16:53
Oh yes, thank you very much. I'll add it in.
â zzuussee
Aug 8 at 16:55
I'm confused. I should find a line or a plane in the solution? Could you write that out for me?
â Guerlando OCs
Aug 8 at 19:43
@GuerlandoOCs Your intersection, the one that you've found, is wrong. You have $n-1$ linearly independent planes intersecting each other. This intersection always is a (affine) line. So in this special case, you should find a line.
â zzuussee
Aug 8 at 19:46
If I don't suppose a $c$ for $z$ then i end up with a plane of all the possible lines, i guess then. If I fix a $z$ then i can find a line and use two points of this line to find a direction vector and a starting point, am i right?
â Guerlando OCs
Aug 8 at 19:47
 |Â
show 1 more comment
Very good answer. After your Gaussian elimination, the $-3$ should be $-5$, right?
â paf
Aug 8 at 16:53
Oh yes, thank you very much. I'll add it in.
â zzuussee
Aug 8 at 16:55
I'm confused. I should find a line or a plane in the solution? Could you write that out for me?
â Guerlando OCs
Aug 8 at 19:43
@GuerlandoOCs Your intersection, the one that you've found, is wrong. You have $n-1$ linearly independent planes intersecting each other. This intersection always is a (affine) line. So in this special case, you should find a line.
â zzuussee
Aug 8 at 19:46
If I don't suppose a $c$ for $z$ then i end up with a plane of all the possible lines, i guess then. If I fix a $z$ then i can find a line and use two points of this line to find a direction vector and a starting point, am i right?
â Guerlando OCs
Aug 8 at 19:47
Very good answer. After your Gaussian elimination, the $-3$ should be $-5$, right?
â paf
Aug 8 at 16:53
Very good answer. After your Gaussian elimination, the $-3$ should be $-5$, right?
â paf
Aug 8 at 16:53
Oh yes, thank you very much. I'll add it in.
â zzuussee
Aug 8 at 16:55
Oh yes, thank you very much. I'll add it in.
â zzuussee
Aug 8 at 16:55
I'm confused. I should find a line or a plane in the solution? Could you write that out for me?
â Guerlando OCs
Aug 8 at 19:43
I'm confused. I should find a line or a plane in the solution? Could you write that out for me?
â Guerlando OCs
Aug 8 at 19:43
@GuerlandoOCs Your intersection, the one that you've found, is wrong. You have $n-1$ linearly independent planes intersecting each other. This intersection always is a (affine) line. So in this special case, you should find a line.
â zzuussee
Aug 8 at 19:46
@GuerlandoOCs Your intersection, the one that you've found, is wrong. You have $n-1$ linearly independent planes intersecting each other. This intersection always is a (affine) line. So in this special case, you should find a line.
â zzuussee
Aug 8 at 19:46
If I don't suppose a $c$ for $z$ then i end up with a plane of all the possible lines, i guess then. If I fix a $z$ then i can find a line and use two points of this line to find a direction vector and a starting point, am i right?
â Guerlando OCs
Aug 8 at 19:47
If I don't suppose a $c$ for $z$ then i end up with a plane of all the possible lines, i guess then. If I fix a $z$ then i can find a line and use two points of this line to find a direction vector and a starting point, am i right?
â Guerlando OCs
Aug 8 at 19:47
 |Â
show 1 more comment
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2876184%2ffind-the-line-y-x-lambda-d-for-n-1-times-n-linear-system-of-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
You should double-check your work in your example. $20x+42z=4$ is the equation of a plane, not a line. Moreover, its intersection with the original two planes is a single point, so it doesnâÂÂt even contain their line of intersection.
â amd
Aug 8 at 19:26