How does one prove Rodrigues' formula for Legendre Polynomials?

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I am trying to prove that $frac1n!space2^nfracd^ndx^n(x^2-1)^n=P_n(x)$, where $P_n(x)$ is the Legendre Polynomial of order n.
I've been told that the proof uses complex analysis, of which I know nothing, isn't there a proof with elementary methods? (If there isn't, I'm still interested in the other one).
orthogonal-polynomials
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I am trying to prove that $frac1n!space2^nfracd^ndx^n(x^2-1)^n=P_n(x)$, where $P_n(x)$ is the Legendre Polynomial of order n.
I've been told that the proof uses complex analysis, of which I know nothing, isn't there a proof with elementary methods? (If there isn't, I'm still interested in the other one).
orthogonal-polynomials
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I am trying to prove that $frac1n!space2^nfracd^ndx^n(x^2-1)^n=P_n(x)$, where $P_n(x)$ is the Legendre Polynomial of order n.
I've been told that the proof uses complex analysis, of which I know nothing, isn't there a proof with elementary methods? (If there isn't, I'm still interested in the other one).
orthogonal-polynomials
I am trying to prove that $frac1n!space2^nfracd^ndx^n(x^2-1)^n=P_n(x)$, where $P_n(x)$ is the Legendre Polynomial of order n.
I've been told that the proof uses complex analysis, of which I know nothing, isn't there a proof with elementary methods? (If there isn't, I'm still interested in the other one).
orthogonal-polynomials
edited Jun 19 '14 at 10:06
asked Jun 18 '14 at 20:16
Alubeixu
11827
11827
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Check that the left side indeed defines an $n$th order polynomial.
Check that $displaystyle int_-1^1P_n(x)P_m(x)dx$ vanishes for $mneq n$ (integration by parts).
Check the normalization condition $P_n(1)=1$ (Leibniz rule).
Added: As you almost correctly write in the comment below, the result of integration by parts (assuming that $m<n$ and transferring the derivatives from $P_n$ to $P_m$) can be written as
$$int_-1^1P_m(x)P_n(x)dx=sum_k=1^nc_mnkleft[fracd^m+k-1 (x^2-1)^mdx^m+k-1fracd^n-k(x^2-1)^ndx^n-kright]_-1^1,$$
where $c_mnk$ is some irrelevant constant. Consider the second factor in the square brackets. There you have a polynomial having $n$th order zeros at $x=pm 1$ which we differentiate $n-k$ times. The result will therefore have $k$th order zeros at these points, which implies vanishing of the integral.
Wow, I hadn't even thought of this, thanks! However, is that enough? Aren't there other polynomials that satisfy condition number 2? And shouldn't I also check that $int_-1^1 P_n(x)P_n(x)dx=frac22n+1$? I will start trying this right now!
â Alubeixu
Jun 18 '14 at 20:32
@Alubeixu it's enough, there are no other polynomials satisfying 2 (since the weight is positive). As for the 3rd question, this property is a consequence but not a part of the standard definition (weight + value at 1 fixing the normalization). A hint for the point 2: e.g if $m<n$, then use integration by parts to transfer the derivatives in $P_n$ to $P_m$.
â Start wearing purple
Jun 18 '14 at 20:38
I'm sorry, could you do point 2 explicitly? I'm stuck at $int_-1^1 fracd^ndx^n(x^2-1)^nfracd^mdx^m(x^2-1)^mdx=sum_i=o^n(fracd^n+idx^n+i(x^2-1)^nfracd^m-1-idx^m-1-i(x^2-1)^m(-1)^i space Big]_-1^1$
â Alubeixu
Jun 19 '14 at 11:03
@Alubeixu I've added some explanations.
â Start wearing purple
Jun 19 '14 at 17:34
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
If $n$ is integer
begineqnarray*
fracd^nd x^n (x^2-1)^n &=& fracd^nd x^n left [
sum_k=0^n (-1)^k fracn!k!(n-k)! x^2n-2k right ] \
&=& sum_k=0^n (-1)^k fracn!k! (n-k)! frac(2n-2k)!(n-2k)! x^n-2k.
endeqnarray*
The sum above does not go up to $k=n$, since after $k=[n/2]$, the derivatives
are 0 then we write
begineqnarray*
fracd^nd x^n (x^2-1)^n &=&
sum_k=0^[n/2] (-1)^k fracn!k! (n-k)! frac(2n-2k)!(n-2k)! x^n-2k.
endeqnarray*
It follows from the infinite series truncated to the Legendre polynmial that
begineqnarray*
P_n(x) = frac12^n n! fracd^ndx^n (x^2-1)^n.
endeqnarray*
The approach followed here is in reverse order. We started with Rodriguez's formula
and showed that it corresponds to a Legendre polynomial. A more intuitive approach
is to start at the polynomials
begineqnarray*
y(x)= (1-x^2)^n.
endeqnarray*
and take derivates, and verifty that the derivatives taken $n$ times will get you
to the Legendre differential equation. That is, we have that
begineqnarray*
y' = -2 n x (1-x^2)^n-1
endeqnarray*
which we can write as
begineqnarray
(1-x^2) y' + 2n x y = 0.
labeltole
endeqnarray
and starts looking a bit like a Legendre differential equation.
We want to differentiate this equation $k$ times and use the Leibniz rule.
That is, if we call $u=1-x^2$,
begineqnarray*
frac d^kdx^k [u y'] = sum_j=0^k binomkj
u^(j) y^(k-j+1)
endeqnarray*
Given that $u$ is a second order polynomial only three terms of this
sum will survive. That is
begineqnarray*
frac d^kdx^k [u y'] &=& u y^(k+1) + k u' y^(k) + k(k-1) u^(2) y^(k-1) \
&=& (1-x^2)y^(k+1) - 2 k x y^(k) -2 frack(k-1)2 y^(k-1) = 0
endeqnarray*
Likewise we use the Leibniz rule for the product $2nxy$ where only two terms will
survive. That is
begineqnarray*
frac d^kdx^k [2 n x y] &=& 2 n x y^(k) + 2 n k y^(k-1),
endeqnarray*
we combine the two results above to find
begineqnarray*
(1-x^2)y^(k+1) - 2 k x y^(k) - k(k-1) y^(k-1)
+ 2 n x y^(k) + 2 n k y^(k-1) = 0
endeqnarray*
At this point we observe that if $k=n+1$, we find
begineqnarray*
(1-x^2)y^(n+2) - 2(n+1) x y^(n+1) - n(n+1) y^(n)
+ 2 n x y^(n+1) + 2 n (n+1) y^(n) = 0
endeqnarray*
which simplifies to
begineqnarray*
(1-x^2) y^(n+2) - 2 x y^(n+1) + n(n+1) y^(n)=0.
endeqnarray*
and this is the Lagrange differential equation with $y^n=P_n$.
We then showed that
begineqnarray*
fracd^ndx^n(1-x^2)^n
endeqnarray*
satisfies the Lagrange differential equation. The factor $1/(2^n n!)$ is
included to make $P(1)=1$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
(The general formula of Legendre Polynomials is given by following equation:
$$
P_k(x)=sum_m=0^frack2frac(-1)^m(2k-2m)!2^km!(k-m)!frac1(k-2m)! x^k-2m
$$
The Rodrigues' formula is:
$$ frac12^kk!fracd^kdx^k[(x^2-1)^k] $$
The Binomial theorem is as follow:
$$(x+y)^k=sum_i=0^kfrack!i!(k-i)!x^k-iy^i$$
Then $$(x^2-1)^k=sum_i=0^kfrack!i!(n-i)!(x^2)^k-i(-1)^i$$
$$frac12^kk!fracd^kdx^k[(x^2-1)^k]=frac12^kk!fracd^kdx^kbig[sum_i=0^kfrack!i!(n-i)!(x^2)^k-i(-1)^ibig]$$
So
$$ =frac12^kk!sum_i=0^kfrack!i!(n-i)!fracd^kdx^k(x)^2k-2i(-1)^i .....(1)$$
$$fracd^kdx^k(x)^2k-2i=frac(2k-2i)!k-2ix^k-2i......(2)$$
By compensate (2) into (1), we get:
$$
P_k(x)=sum_m=0^frack2frac(-1)^i(2k-2i)!2^ki!(k-i)!frac1(k-2i)! x^k-2i
$$
Change dummy variable (i) to (m), we get the same general formula of Legendre Polynomials :
$$
P_k(x)=sum_m=0^frack2frac(-1)^m(2k-2m)!2^km!(k-m)!frac1(k-2m)! x^k-2m
$$
1
Welcome to math.se! I have to ask you: what does notation $frack2Big| frack-12$ mean?
â Nik Pronko
Aug 8 at 13:57
Imagine you are looking for $$P_5(x)$$ (odd polynomial) then the the sum start from m=0 to 2: $$sum_m=0^frack-i2$$, while $$frack2$$ isvalid for even polynomial such as $$P_4$$.
â Mohamed Abugammar
Aug 9 at 14:46
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Check that the left side indeed defines an $n$th order polynomial.
Check that $displaystyle int_-1^1P_n(x)P_m(x)dx$ vanishes for $mneq n$ (integration by parts).
Check the normalization condition $P_n(1)=1$ (Leibniz rule).
Added: As you almost correctly write in the comment below, the result of integration by parts (assuming that $m<n$ and transferring the derivatives from $P_n$ to $P_m$) can be written as
$$int_-1^1P_m(x)P_n(x)dx=sum_k=1^nc_mnkleft[fracd^m+k-1 (x^2-1)^mdx^m+k-1fracd^n-k(x^2-1)^ndx^n-kright]_-1^1,$$
where $c_mnk$ is some irrelevant constant. Consider the second factor in the square brackets. There you have a polynomial having $n$th order zeros at $x=pm 1$ which we differentiate $n-k$ times. The result will therefore have $k$th order zeros at these points, which implies vanishing of the integral.
Wow, I hadn't even thought of this, thanks! However, is that enough? Aren't there other polynomials that satisfy condition number 2? And shouldn't I also check that $int_-1^1 P_n(x)P_n(x)dx=frac22n+1$? I will start trying this right now!
â Alubeixu
Jun 18 '14 at 20:32
@Alubeixu it's enough, there are no other polynomials satisfying 2 (since the weight is positive). As for the 3rd question, this property is a consequence but not a part of the standard definition (weight + value at 1 fixing the normalization). A hint for the point 2: e.g if $m<n$, then use integration by parts to transfer the derivatives in $P_n$ to $P_m$.
â Start wearing purple
Jun 18 '14 at 20:38
I'm sorry, could you do point 2 explicitly? I'm stuck at $int_-1^1 fracd^ndx^n(x^2-1)^nfracd^mdx^m(x^2-1)^mdx=sum_i=o^n(fracd^n+idx^n+i(x^2-1)^nfracd^m-1-idx^m-1-i(x^2-1)^m(-1)^i space Big]_-1^1$
â Alubeixu
Jun 19 '14 at 11:03
@Alubeixu I've added some explanations.
â Start wearing purple
Jun 19 '14 at 17:34
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Check that the left side indeed defines an $n$th order polynomial.
Check that $displaystyle int_-1^1P_n(x)P_m(x)dx$ vanishes for $mneq n$ (integration by parts).
Check the normalization condition $P_n(1)=1$ (Leibniz rule).
Added: As you almost correctly write in the comment below, the result of integration by parts (assuming that $m<n$ and transferring the derivatives from $P_n$ to $P_m$) can be written as
$$int_-1^1P_m(x)P_n(x)dx=sum_k=1^nc_mnkleft[fracd^m+k-1 (x^2-1)^mdx^m+k-1fracd^n-k(x^2-1)^ndx^n-kright]_-1^1,$$
where $c_mnk$ is some irrelevant constant. Consider the second factor in the square brackets. There you have a polynomial having $n$th order zeros at $x=pm 1$ which we differentiate $n-k$ times. The result will therefore have $k$th order zeros at these points, which implies vanishing of the integral.
Wow, I hadn't even thought of this, thanks! However, is that enough? Aren't there other polynomials that satisfy condition number 2? And shouldn't I also check that $int_-1^1 P_n(x)P_n(x)dx=frac22n+1$? I will start trying this right now!
â Alubeixu
Jun 18 '14 at 20:32
@Alubeixu it's enough, there are no other polynomials satisfying 2 (since the weight is positive). As for the 3rd question, this property is a consequence but not a part of the standard definition (weight + value at 1 fixing the normalization). A hint for the point 2: e.g if $m<n$, then use integration by parts to transfer the derivatives in $P_n$ to $P_m$.
â Start wearing purple
Jun 18 '14 at 20:38
I'm sorry, could you do point 2 explicitly? I'm stuck at $int_-1^1 fracd^ndx^n(x^2-1)^nfracd^mdx^m(x^2-1)^mdx=sum_i=o^n(fracd^n+idx^n+i(x^2-1)^nfracd^m-1-idx^m-1-i(x^2-1)^m(-1)^i space Big]_-1^1$
â Alubeixu
Jun 19 '14 at 11:03
@Alubeixu I've added some explanations.
â Start wearing purple
Jun 19 '14 at 17:34
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Check that the left side indeed defines an $n$th order polynomial.
Check that $displaystyle int_-1^1P_n(x)P_m(x)dx$ vanishes for $mneq n$ (integration by parts).
Check the normalization condition $P_n(1)=1$ (Leibniz rule).
Added: As you almost correctly write in the comment below, the result of integration by parts (assuming that $m<n$ and transferring the derivatives from $P_n$ to $P_m$) can be written as
$$int_-1^1P_m(x)P_n(x)dx=sum_k=1^nc_mnkleft[fracd^m+k-1 (x^2-1)^mdx^m+k-1fracd^n-k(x^2-1)^ndx^n-kright]_-1^1,$$
where $c_mnk$ is some irrelevant constant. Consider the second factor in the square brackets. There you have a polynomial having $n$th order zeros at $x=pm 1$ which we differentiate $n-k$ times. The result will therefore have $k$th order zeros at these points, which implies vanishing of the integral.
Check that the left side indeed defines an $n$th order polynomial.
Check that $displaystyle int_-1^1P_n(x)P_m(x)dx$ vanishes for $mneq n$ (integration by parts).
Check the normalization condition $P_n(1)=1$ (Leibniz rule).
Added: As you almost correctly write in the comment below, the result of integration by parts (assuming that $m<n$ and transferring the derivatives from $P_n$ to $P_m$) can be written as
$$int_-1^1P_m(x)P_n(x)dx=sum_k=1^nc_mnkleft[fracd^m+k-1 (x^2-1)^mdx^m+k-1fracd^n-k(x^2-1)^ndx^n-kright]_-1^1,$$
where $c_mnk$ is some irrelevant constant. Consider the second factor in the square brackets. There you have a polynomial having $n$th order zeros at $x=pm 1$ which we differentiate $n-k$ times. The result will therefore have $k$th order zeros at these points, which implies vanishing of the integral.
edited Jun 19 '14 at 17:33
answered Jun 18 '14 at 20:23
Start wearing purple
46.7k12134188
46.7k12134188
Wow, I hadn't even thought of this, thanks! However, is that enough? Aren't there other polynomials that satisfy condition number 2? And shouldn't I also check that $int_-1^1 P_n(x)P_n(x)dx=frac22n+1$? I will start trying this right now!
â Alubeixu
Jun 18 '14 at 20:32
@Alubeixu it's enough, there are no other polynomials satisfying 2 (since the weight is positive). As for the 3rd question, this property is a consequence but not a part of the standard definition (weight + value at 1 fixing the normalization). A hint for the point 2: e.g if $m<n$, then use integration by parts to transfer the derivatives in $P_n$ to $P_m$.
â Start wearing purple
Jun 18 '14 at 20:38
I'm sorry, could you do point 2 explicitly? I'm stuck at $int_-1^1 fracd^ndx^n(x^2-1)^nfracd^mdx^m(x^2-1)^mdx=sum_i=o^n(fracd^n+idx^n+i(x^2-1)^nfracd^m-1-idx^m-1-i(x^2-1)^m(-1)^i space Big]_-1^1$
â Alubeixu
Jun 19 '14 at 11:03
@Alubeixu I've added some explanations.
â Start wearing purple
Jun 19 '14 at 17:34
add a comment |Â
Wow, I hadn't even thought of this, thanks! However, is that enough? Aren't there other polynomials that satisfy condition number 2? And shouldn't I also check that $int_-1^1 P_n(x)P_n(x)dx=frac22n+1$? I will start trying this right now!
â Alubeixu
Jun 18 '14 at 20:32
@Alubeixu it's enough, there are no other polynomials satisfying 2 (since the weight is positive). As for the 3rd question, this property is a consequence but not a part of the standard definition (weight + value at 1 fixing the normalization). A hint for the point 2: e.g if $m<n$, then use integration by parts to transfer the derivatives in $P_n$ to $P_m$.
â Start wearing purple
Jun 18 '14 at 20:38
I'm sorry, could you do point 2 explicitly? I'm stuck at $int_-1^1 fracd^ndx^n(x^2-1)^nfracd^mdx^m(x^2-1)^mdx=sum_i=o^n(fracd^n+idx^n+i(x^2-1)^nfracd^m-1-idx^m-1-i(x^2-1)^m(-1)^i space Big]_-1^1$
â Alubeixu
Jun 19 '14 at 11:03
@Alubeixu I've added some explanations.
â Start wearing purple
Jun 19 '14 at 17:34
Wow, I hadn't even thought of this, thanks! However, is that enough? Aren't there other polynomials that satisfy condition number 2? And shouldn't I also check that $int_-1^1 P_n(x)P_n(x)dx=frac22n+1$? I will start trying this right now!
â Alubeixu
Jun 18 '14 at 20:32
Wow, I hadn't even thought of this, thanks! However, is that enough? Aren't there other polynomials that satisfy condition number 2? And shouldn't I also check that $int_-1^1 P_n(x)P_n(x)dx=frac22n+1$? I will start trying this right now!
â Alubeixu
Jun 18 '14 at 20:32
@Alubeixu it's enough, there are no other polynomials satisfying 2 (since the weight is positive). As for the 3rd question, this property is a consequence but not a part of the standard definition (weight + value at 1 fixing the normalization). A hint for the point 2: e.g if $m<n$, then use integration by parts to transfer the derivatives in $P_n$ to $P_m$.
â Start wearing purple
Jun 18 '14 at 20:38
@Alubeixu it's enough, there are no other polynomials satisfying 2 (since the weight is positive). As for the 3rd question, this property is a consequence but not a part of the standard definition (weight + value at 1 fixing the normalization). A hint for the point 2: e.g if $m<n$, then use integration by parts to transfer the derivatives in $P_n$ to $P_m$.
â Start wearing purple
Jun 18 '14 at 20:38
I'm sorry, could you do point 2 explicitly? I'm stuck at $int_-1^1 fracd^ndx^n(x^2-1)^nfracd^mdx^m(x^2-1)^mdx=sum_i=o^n(fracd^n+idx^n+i(x^2-1)^nfracd^m-1-idx^m-1-i(x^2-1)^m(-1)^i space Big]_-1^1$
â Alubeixu
Jun 19 '14 at 11:03
I'm sorry, could you do point 2 explicitly? I'm stuck at $int_-1^1 fracd^ndx^n(x^2-1)^nfracd^mdx^m(x^2-1)^mdx=sum_i=o^n(fracd^n+idx^n+i(x^2-1)^nfracd^m-1-idx^m-1-i(x^2-1)^m(-1)^i space Big]_-1^1$
â Alubeixu
Jun 19 '14 at 11:03
@Alubeixu I've added some explanations.
â Start wearing purple
Jun 19 '14 at 17:34
@Alubeixu I've added some explanations.
â Start wearing purple
Jun 19 '14 at 17:34
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
If $n$ is integer
begineqnarray*
fracd^nd x^n (x^2-1)^n &=& fracd^nd x^n left [
sum_k=0^n (-1)^k fracn!k!(n-k)! x^2n-2k right ] \
&=& sum_k=0^n (-1)^k fracn!k! (n-k)! frac(2n-2k)!(n-2k)! x^n-2k.
endeqnarray*
The sum above does not go up to $k=n$, since after $k=[n/2]$, the derivatives
are 0 then we write
begineqnarray*
fracd^nd x^n (x^2-1)^n &=&
sum_k=0^[n/2] (-1)^k fracn!k! (n-k)! frac(2n-2k)!(n-2k)! x^n-2k.
endeqnarray*
It follows from the infinite series truncated to the Legendre polynmial that
begineqnarray*
P_n(x) = frac12^n n! fracd^ndx^n (x^2-1)^n.
endeqnarray*
The approach followed here is in reverse order. We started with Rodriguez's formula
and showed that it corresponds to a Legendre polynomial. A more intuitive approach
is to start at the polynomials
begineqnarray*
y(x)= (1-x^2)^n.
endeqnarray*
and take derivates, and verifty that the derivatives taken $n$ times will get you
to the Legendre differential equation. That is, we have that
begineqnarray*
y' = -2 n x (1-x^2)^n-1
endeqnarray*
which we can write as
begineqnarray
(1-x^2) y' + 2n x y = 0.
labeltole
endeqnarray
and starts looking a bit like a Legendre differential equation.
We want to differentiate this equation $k$ times and use the Leibniz rule.
That is, if we call $u=1-x^2$,
begineqnarray*
frac d^kdx^k [u y'] = sum_j=0^k binomkj
u^(j) y^(k-j+1)
endeqnarray*
Given that $u$ is a second order polynomial only three terms of this
sum will survive. That is
begineqnarray*
frac d^kdx^k [u y'] &=& u y^(k+1) + k u' y^(k) + k(k-1) u^(2) y^(k-1) \
&=& (1-x^2)y^(k+1) - 2 k x y^(k) -2 frack(k-1)2 y^(k-1) = 0
endeqnarray*
Likewise we use the Leibniz rule for the product $2nxy$ where only two terms will
survive. That is
begineqnarray*
frac d^kdx^k [2 n x y] &=& 2 n x y^(k) + 2 n k y^(k-1),
endeqnarray*
we combine the two results above to find
begineqnarray*
(1-x^2)y^(k+1) - 2 k x y^(k) - k(k-1) y^(k-1)
+ 2 n x y^(k) + 2 n k y^(k-1) = 0
endeqnarray*
At this point we observe that if $k=n+1$, we find
begineqnarray*
(1-x^2)y^(n+2) - 2(n+1) x y^(n+1) - n(n+1) y^(n)
+ 2 n x y^(n+1) + 2 n (n+1) y^(n) = 0
endeqnarray*
which simplifies to
begineqnarray*
(1-x^2) y^(n+2) - 2 x y^(n+1) + n(n+1) y^(n)=0.
endeqnarray*
and this is the Lagrange differential equation with $y^n=P_n$.
We then showed that
begineqnarray*
fracd^ndx^n(1-x^2)^n
endeqnarray*
satisfies the Lagrange differential equation. The factor $1/(2^n n!)$ is
included to make $P(1)=1$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
If $n$ is integer
begineqnarray*
fracd^nd x^n (x^2-1)^n &=& fracd^nd x^n left [
sum_k=0^n (-1)^k fracn!k!(n-k)! x^2n-2k right ] \
&=& sum_k=0^n (-1)^k fracn!k! (n-k)! frac(2n-2k)!(n-2k)! x^n-2k.
endeqnarray*
The sum above does not go up to $k=n$, since after $k=[n/2]$, the derivatives
are 0 then we write
begineqnarray*
fracd^nd x^n (x^2-1)^n &=&
sum_k=0^[n/2] (-1)^k fracn!k! (n-k)! frac(2n-2k)!(n-2k)! x^n-2k.
endeqnarray*
It follows from the infinite series truncated to the Legendre polynmial that
begineqnarray*
P_n(x) = frac12^n n! fracd^ndx^n (x^2-1)^n.
endeqnarray*
The approach followed here is in reverse order. We started with Rodriguez's formula
and showed that it corresponds to a Legendre polynomial. A more intuitive approach
is to start at the polynomials
begineqnarray*
y(x)= (1-x^2)^n.
endeqnarray*
and take derivates, and verifty that the derivatives taken $n$ times will get you
to the Legendre differential equation. That is, we have that
begineqnarray*
y' = -2 n x (1-x^2)^n-1
endeqnarray*
which we can write as
begineqnarray
(1-x^2) y' + 2n x y = 0.
labeltole
endeqnarray
and starts looking a bit like a Legendre differential equation.
We want to differentiate this equation $k$ times and use the Leibniz rule.
That is, if we call $u=1-x^2$,
begineqnarray*
frac d^kdx^k [u y'] = sum_j=0^k binomkj
u^(j) y^(k-j+1)
endeqnarray*
Given that $u$ is a second order polynomial only three terms of this
sum will survive. That is
begineqnarray*
frac d^kdx^k [u y'] &=& u y^(k+1) + k u' y^(k) + k(k-1) u^(2) y^(k-1) \
&=& (1-x^2)y^(k+1) - 2 k x y^(k) -2 frack(k-1)2 y^(k-1) = 0
endeqnarray*
Likewise we use the Leibniz rule for the product $2nxy$ where only two terms will
survive. That is
begineqnarray*
frac d^kdx^k [2 n x y] &=& 2 n x y^(k) + 2 n k y^(k-1),
endeqnarray*
we combine the two results above to find
begineqnarray*
(1-x^2)y^(k+1) - 2 k x y^(k) - k(k-1) y^(k-1)
+ 2 n x y^(k) + 2 n k y^(k-1) = 0
endeqnarray*
At this point we observe that if $k=n+1$, we find
begineqnarray*
(1-x^2)y^(n+2) - 2(n+1) x y^(n+1) - n(n+1) y^(n)
+ 2 n x y^(n+1) + 2 n (n+1) y^(n) = 0
endeqnarray*
which simplifies to
begineqnarray*
(1-x^2) y^(n+2) - 2 x y^(n+1) + n(n+1) y^(n)=0.
endeqnarray*
and this is the Lagrange differential equation with $y^n=P_n$.
We then showed that
begineqnarray*
fracd^ndx^n(1-x^2)^n
endeqnarray*
satisfies the Lagrange differential equation. The factor $1/(2^n n!)$ is
included to make $P(1)=1$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
If $n$ is integer
begineqnarray*
fracd^nd x^n (x^2-1)^n &=& fracd^nd x^n left [
sum_k=0^n (-1)^k fracn!k!(n-k)! x^2n-2k right ] \
&=& sum_k=0^n (-1)^k fracn!k! (n-k)! frac(2n-2k)!(n-2k)! x^n-2k.
endeqnarray*
The sum above does not go up to $k=n$, since after $k=[n/2]$, the derivatives
are 0 then we write
begineqnarray*
fracd^nd x^n (x^2-1)^n &=&
sum_k=0^[n/2] (-1)^k fracn!k! (n-k)! frac(2n-2k)!(n-2k)! x^n-2k.
endeqnarray*
It follows from the infinite series truncated to the Legendre polynmial that
begineqnarray*
P_n(x) = frac12^n n! fracd^ndx^n (x^2-1)^n.
endeqnarray*
The approach followed here is in reverse order. We started with Rodriguez's formula
and showed that it corresponds to a Legendre polynomial. A more intuitive approach
is to start at the polynomials
begineqnarray*
y(x)= (1-x^2)^n.
endeqnarray*
and take derivates, and verifty that the derivatives taken $n$ times will get you
to the Legendre differential equation. That is, we have that
begineqnarray*
y' = -2 n x (1-x^2)^n-1
endeqnarray*
which we can write as
begineqnarray
(1-x^2) y' + 2n x y = 0.
labeltole
endeqnarray
and starts looking a bit like a Legendre differential equation.
We want to differentiate this equation $k$ times and use the Leibniz rule.
That is, if we call $u=1-x^2$,
begineqnarray*
frac d^kdx^k [u y'] = sum_j=0^k binomkj
u^(j) y^(k-j+1)
endeqnarray*
Given that $u$ is a second order polynomial only three terms of this
sum will survive. That is
begineqnarray*
frac d^kdx^k [u y'] &=& u y^(k+1) + k u' y^(k) + k(k-1) u^(2) y^(k-1) \
&=& (1-x^2)y^(k+1) - 2 k x y^(k) -2 frack(k-1)2 y^(k-1) = 0
endeqnarray*
Likewise we use the Leibniz rule for the product $2nxy$ where only two terms will
survive. That is
begineqnarray*
frac d^kdx^k [2 n x y] &=& 2 n x y^(k) + 2 n k y^(k-1),
endeqnarray*
we combine the two results above to find
begineqnarray*
(1-x^2)y^(k+1) - 2 k x y^(k) - k(k-1) y^(k-1)
+ 2 n x y^(k) + 2 n k y^(k-1) = 0
endeqnarray*
At this point we observe that if $k=n+1$, we find
begineqnarray*
(1-x^2)y^(n+2) - 2(n+1) x y^(n+1) - n(n+1) y^(n)
+ 2 n x y^(n+1) + 2 n (n+1) y^(n) = 0
endeqnarray*
which simplifies to
begineqnarray*
(1-x^2) y^(n+2) - 2 x y^(n+1) + n(n+1) y^(n)=0.
endeqnarray*
and this is the Lagrange differential equation with $y^n=P_n$.
We then showed that
begineqnarray*
fracd^ndx^n(1-x^2)^n
endeqnarray*
satisfies the Lagrange differential equation. The factor $1/(2^n n!)$ is
included to make $P(1)=1$.
If $n$ is integer
begineqnarray*
fracd^nd x^n (x^2-1)^n &=& fracd^nd x^n left [
sum_k=0^n (-1)^k fracn!k!(n-k)! x^2n-2k right ] \
&=& sum_k=0^n (-1)^k fracn!k! (n-k)! frac(2n-2k)!(n-2k)! x^n-2k.
endeqnarray*
The sum above does not go up to $k=n$, since after $k=[n/2]$, the derivatives
are 0 then we write
begineqnarray*
fracd^nd x^n (x^2-1)^n &=&
sum_k=0^[n/2] (-1)^k fracn!k! (n-k)! frac(2n-2k)!(n-2k)! x^n-2k.
endeqnarray*
It follows from the infinite series truncated to the Legendre polynmial that
begineqnarray*
P_n(x) = frac12^n n! fracd^ndx^n (x^2-1)^n.
endeqnarray*
The approach followed here is in reverse order. We started with Rodriguez's formula
and showed that it corresponds to a Legendre polynomial. A more intuitive approach
is to start at the polynomials
begineqnarray*
y(x)= (1-x^2)^n.
endeqnarray*
and take derivates, and verifty that the derivatives taken $n$ times will get you
to the Legendre differential equation. That is, we have that
begineqnarray*
y' = -2 n x (1-x^2)^n-1
endeqnarray*
which we can write as
begineqnarray
(1-x^2) y' + 2n x y = 0.
labeltole
endeqnarray
and starts looking a bit like a Legendre differential equation.
We want to differentiate this equation $k$ times and use the Leibniz rule.
That is, if we call $u=1-x^2$,
begineqnarray*
frac d^kdx^k [u y'] = sum_j=0^k binomkj
u^(j) y^(k-j+1)
endeqnarray*
Given that $u$ is a second order polynomial only three terms of this
sum will survive. That is
begineqnarray*
frac d^kdx^k [u y'] &=& u y^(k+1) + k u' y^(k) + k(k-1) u^(2) y^(k-1) \
&=& (1-x^2)y^(k+1) - 2 k x y^(k) -2 frack(k-1)2 y^(k-1) = 0
endeqnarray*
Likewise we use the Leibniz rule for the product $2nxy$ where only two terms will
survive. That is
begineqnarray*
frac d^kdx^k [2 n x y] &=& 2 n x y^(k) + 2 n k y^(k-1),
endeqnarray*
we combine the two results above to find
begineqnarray*
(1-x^2)y^(k+1) - 2 k x y^(k) - k(k-1) y^(k-1)
+ 2 n x y^(k) + 2 n k y^(k-1) = 0
endeqnarray*
At this point we observe that if $k=n+1$, we find
begineqnarray*
(1-x^2)y^(n+2) - 2(n+1) x y^(n+1) - n(n+1) y^(n)
+ 2 n x y^(n+1) + 2 n (n+1) y^(n) = 0
endeqnarray*
which simplifies to
begineqnarray*
(1-x^2) y^(n+2) - 2 x y^(n+1) + n(n+1) y^(n)=0.
endeqnarray*
and this is the Lagrange differential equation with $y^n=P_n$.
We then showed that
begineqnarray*
fracd^ndx^n(1-x^2)^n
endeqnarray*
satisfies the Lagrange differential equation. The factor $1/(2^n n!)$ is
included to make $P(1)=1$.
answered Apr 6 '17 at 1:33
Herman Jaramillo
1,169818
1,169818
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
(The general formula of Legendre Polynomials is given by following equation:
$$
P_k(x)=sum_m=0^frack2frac(-1)^m(2k-2m)!2^km!(k-m)!frac1(k-2m)! x^k-2m
$$
The Rodrigues' formula is:
$$ frac12^kk!fracd^kdx^k[(x^2-1)^k] $$
The Binomial theorem is as follow:
$$(x+y)^k=sum_i=0^kfrack!i!(k-i)!x^k-iy^i$$
Then $$(x^2-1)^k=sum_i=0^kfrack!i!(n-i)!(x^2)^k-i(-1)^i$$
$$frac12^kk!fracd^kdx^k[(x^2-1)^k]=frac12^kk!fracd^kdx^kbig[sum_i=0^kfrack!i!(n-i)!(x^2)^k-i(-1)^ibig]$$
So
$$ =frac12^kk!sum_i=0^kfrack!i!(n-i)!fracd^kdx^k(x)^2k-2i(-1)^i .....(1)$$
$$fracd^kdx^k(x)^2k-2i=frac(2k-2i)!k-2ix^k-2i......(2)$$
By compensate (2) into (1), we get:
$$
P_k(x)=sum_m=0^frack2frac(-1)^i(2k-2i)!2^ki!(k-i)!frac1(k-2i)! x^k-2i
$$
Change dummy variable (i) to (m), we get the same general formula of Legendre Polynomials :
$$
P_k(x)=sum_m=0^frack2frac(-1)^m(2k-2m)!2^km!(k-m)!frac1(k-2m)! x^k-2m
$$
1
Welcome to math.se! I have to ask you: what does notation $frack2Big| frack-12$ mean?
â Nik Pronko
Aug 8 at 13:57
Imagine you are looking for $$P_5(x)$$ (odd polynomial) then the the sum start from m=0 to 2: $$sum_m=0^frack-i2$$, while $$frack2$$ isvalid for even polynomial such as $$P_4$$.
â Mohamed Abugammar
Aug 9 at 14:46
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
(The general formula of Legendre Polynomials is given by following equation:
$$
P_k(x)=sum_m=0^frack2frac(-1)^m(2k-2m)!2^km!(k-m)!frac1(k-2m)! x^k-2m
$$
The Rodrigues' formula is:
$$ frac12^kk!fracd^kdx^k[(x^2-1)^k] $$
The Binomial theorem is as follow:
$$(x+y)^k=sum_i=0^kfrack!i!(k-i)!x^k-iy^i$$
Then $$(x^2-1)^k=sum_i=0^kfrack!i!(n-i)!(x^2)^k-i(-1)^i$$
$$frac12^kk!fracd^kdx^k[(x^2-1)^k]=frac12^kk!fracd^kdx^kbig[sum_i=0^kfrack!i!(n-i)!(x^2)^k-i(-1)^ibig]$$
So
$$ =frac12^kk!sum_i=0^kfrack!i!(n-i)!fracd^kdx^k(x)^2k-2i(-1)^i .....(1)$$
$$fracd^kdx^k(x)^2k-2i=frac(2k-2i)!k-2ix^k-2i......(2)$$
By compensate (2) into (1), we get:
$$
P_k(x)=sum_m=0^frack2frac(-1)^i(2k-2i)!2^ki!(k-i)!frac1(k-2i)! x^k-2i
$$
Change dummy variable (i) to (m), we get the same general formula of Legendre Polynomials :
$$
P_k(x)=sum_m=0^frack2frac(-1)^m(2k-2m)!2^km!(k-m)!frac1(k-2m)! x^k-2m
$$
1
Welcome to math.se! I have to ask you: what does notation $frack2Big| frack-12$ mean?
â Nik Pronko
Aug 8 at 13:57
Imagine you are looking for $$P_5(x)$$ (odd polynomial) then the the sum start from m=0 to 2: $$sum_m=0^frack-i2$$, while $$frack2$$ isvalid for even polynomial such as $$P_4$$.
â Mohamed Abugammar
Aug 9 at 14:46
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
(The general formula of Legendre Polynomials is given by following equation:
$$
P_k(x)=sum_m=0^frack2frac(-1)^m(2k-2m)!2^km!(k-m)!frac1(k-2m)! x^k-2m
$$
The Rodrigues' formula is:
$$ frac12^kk!fracd^kdx^k[(x^2-1)^k] $$
The Binomial theorem is as follow:
$$(x+y)^k=sum_i=0^kfrack!i!(k-i)!x^k-iy^i$$
Then $$(x^2-1)^k=sum_i=0^kfrack!i!(n-i)!(x^2)^k-i(-1)^i$$
$$frac12^kk!fracd^kdx^k[(x^2-1)^k]=frac12^kk!fracd^kdx^kbig[sum_i=0^kfrack!i!(n-i)!(x^2)^k-i(-1)^ibig]$$
So
$$ =frac12^kk!sum_i=0^kfrack!i!(n-i)!fracd^kdx^k(x)^2k-2i(-1)^i .....(1)$$
$$fracd^kdx^k(x)^2k-2i=frac(2k-2i)!k-2ix^k-2i......(2)$$
By compensate (2) into (1), we get:
$$
P_k(x)=sum_m=0^frack2frac(-1)^i(2k-2i)!2^ki!(k-i)!frac1(k-2i)! x^k-2i
$$
Change dummy variable (i) to (m), we get the same general formula of Legendre Polynomials :
$$
P_k(x)=sum_m=0^frack2frac(-1)^m(2k-2m)!2^km!(k-m)!frac1(k-2m)! x^k-2m
$$
(The general formula of Legendre Polynomials is given by following equation:
$$
P_k(x)=sum_m=0^frack2frac(-1)^m(2k-2m)!2^km!(k-m)!frac1(k-2m)! x^k-2m
$$
The Rodrigues' formula is:
$$ frac12^kk!fracd^kdx^k[(x^2-1)^k] $$
The Binomial theorem is as follow:
$$(x+y)^k=sum_i=0^kfrack!i!(k-i)!x^k-iy^i$$
Then $$(x^2-1)^k=sum_i=0^kfrack!i!(n-i)!(x^2)^k-i(-1)^i$$
$$frac12^kk!fracd^kdx^k[(x^2-1)^k]=frac12^kk!fracd^kdx^kbig[sum_i=0^kfrack!i!(n-i)!(x^2)^k-i(-1)^ibig]$$
So
$$ =frac12^kk!sum_i=0^kfrack!i!(n-i)!fracd^kdx^k(x)^2k-2i(-1)^i .....(1)$$
$$fracd^kdx^k(x)^2k-2i=frac(2k-2i)!k-2ix^k-2i......(2)$$
By compensate (2) into (1), we get:
$$
P_k(x)=sum_m=0^frack2frac(-1)^i(2k-2i)!2^ki!(k-i)!frac1(k-2i)! x^k-2i
$$
Change dummy variable (i) to (m), we get the same general formula of Legendre Polynomials :
$$
P_k(x)=sum_m=0^frack2frac(-1)^m(2k-2m)!2^km!(k-m)!frac1(k-2m)! x^k-2m
$$
answered Aug 8 at 13:49
Mohamed Abugammar
11
11
1
Welcome to math.se! I have to ask you: what does notation $frack2Big| frack-12$ mean?
â Nik Pronko
Aug 8 at 13:57
Imagine you are looking for $$P_5(x)$$ (odd polynomial) then the the sum start from m=0 to 2: $$sum_m=0^frack-i2$$, while $$frack2$$ isvalid for even polynomial such as $$P_4$$.
â Mohamed Abugammar
Aug 9 at 14:46
add a comment |Â
1
Welcome to math.se! I have to ask you: what does notation $frack2Big| frack-12$ mean?
â Nik Pronko
Aug 8 at 13:57
Imagine you are looking for $$P_5(x)$$ (odd polynomial) then the the sum start from m=0 to 2: $$sum_m=0^frack-i2$$, while $$frack2$$ isvalid for even polynomial such as $$P_4$$.
â Mohamed Abugammar
Aug 9 at 14:46
1
1
Welcome to math.se! I have to ask you: what does notation $frack2Big| frack-12$ mean?
â Nik Pronko
Aug 8 at 13:57
Welcome to math.se! I have to ask you: what does notation $frack2Big| frack-12$ mean?
â Nik Pronko
Aug 8 at 13:57
Imagine you are looking for $$P_5(x)$$ (odd polynomial) then the the sum start from m=0 to 2: $$sum_m=0^frack-i2$$, while $$frack2$$ isvalid for even polynomial such as $$P_4$$.
â Mohamed Abugammar
Aug 9 at 14:46
Imagine you are looking for $$P_5(x)$$ (odd polynomial) then the the sum start from m=0 to 2: $$sum_m=0^frack-i2$$, while $$frack2$$ isvalid for even polynomial such as $$P_4$$.
â Mohamed Abugammar
Aug 9 at 14:46
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f838873%2fhow-does-one-prove-rodrigues-formula-for-legendre-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password